Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Apr 18;68(Pt 5):o1428. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812015826

Benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithio­phene-4,8-dione

Amanda L Ramirez a, Benny C Chan b, Daniel T de Lill a,*
PMCID: PMC3344548  PMID: 22590310

Abstract

The title mol­ecule, C10H4O2S2, is situated on a crystallographic center of inversion. In the crystal, weak hydrogen bonding contributes to the packing of the mol­ecules.

Related literature  

This dione was synthesized according to modified literature procedures, see: Beimlung & Kossmehl (1986); Slocum & Gierer (1976). It is a precursor to many different semiconducting polymeric compounds and the structure is important in that it appears as crystalline products in poorly purified materials, see: Hundt et al. (2009); Subramaniyan et al. (2011); Yamamoto et al. (2011). For weak inter­molecular inter­actions, see: Janiak (2000); Sinnokrot et al. (2002).graphic file with name e-68-o1428-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C10H4O2S2

  • M r = 220.25

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 5.6402 (5) Å

  • b = 5.7745 (5) Å

  • c = 13.6223 (12) Å

  • β = 97.371 (1)°

  • V = 440.00 (7) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.57 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.08 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001) T min = 0.955, T max = 0.978

  • 4888 measured reflections

  • 1062 independent reflections

  • 815 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.072

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.068

  • wR(F 2) = 0.238

  • S = 1.09

  • 1062 reflections

  • 64 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.78 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.57 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: CrystalMaker (Palmer, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015826/rn2094sup1.cif

e-68-o1428-sup1.cif (11.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015826/rn2094Isup2.hkl

e-68-o1428-Isup2.hkl (52.6KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015826/rn2094Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C5—H5⋯O1i 0.93 2.44 3.319 (4) 158

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Florida Atlantic University for funding and the National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation Grant (No. 0922931).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Benzodithiophene-4,8-dione (BDTD) is a common precursor for the construction of semiconducting organic monomers. Given our interest in this field, we have isolated single crystals of this compound for structural determination. This structure is important in that it appears as crystalline products in poorly purified materials.

A thermal ellipsoid plot (Fig. 1) displays the molecular structure of the title compound.

Figure 2 shows a packing diagram of the crystal structure. Weak intermolecular interactions attribute to the packing of this compound, see: Sinnokrot et al. (2002); Janiak (2000). The closest CH···centroid distance is C1—H1···Cg1 at 3.715 (4) Å between a hydrogen atom and the center of a neighboring thiophene ring. No classic hydrogen bonds were found, but a weak hydrogen bond from C5—H5···O1 is present at 3.319 (4) Å D—A distance.

Experimental

The title compound was prepared according to a modified literature procedure (Beimlung & Kossmehl, 1986). In a typical reaction, 2 g of 3-theonic acid was reacted with excess thionyl chloride (50 ml) at reflux temperature overnight to produce the resulting acid chloride. Upon removal of the thionyl chloride, the acid chloride was dissolved in toluene (minimum amount). The acid chloride was then added to excess diethylamine (approximately 42 ml) to produce the thiophene amide. The product was isolated in diethyl ether, concentrated, and then re-dissolved in ether (30 ml). The amide was then cyclized with excess n-butyl lithium (1.6 M in hexane, approximately 7 ml) added dropwise and allowed to stir overnight. The reaction was quenched with water, filtered, and recrystallized from glacial acetic acid in a 31–45% yield depending on reaction.

Upon isolation of the final compound, crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained from slow evaporation of approximately 20 mg of product in approximately 5 ml of chloroform. Clear, yellow block crystals formed overnight.

Refinement

Crystallography. Hydrogen atom positions were placed in calculated positions and allowed to ride on the coordinates of the parent atom [C—H distances at 0.93 Å and Uiso(H)=1.2Uiso(C)].

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

: Thermal ellipsoid plot (50% probablility) of title compound. Hydrogen atoms are omitted. Symmetry operator: i=-x + 2, -y + 1, -z + 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

: Packing diagram of title compound down [010]. Hydrogen atoms were removed for clarity.

Crystal data

C10H4O2S2 F(000) = 224
Mr = 220.25 Dx = 1.662 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.6402 (5) Å Cell parameters from 2545 reflections
b = 5.7745 (5) Å θ = 6.0–55.2°
c = 13.6223 (12) Å µ = 0.57 mm1
β = 97.371 (1)° T = 296 K
V = 440.00 (7) Å3 Prismatic block, clear yellow
Z = 2 0.08 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII diffractometer 1062 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 815 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.072
Fixed Chi scans θmax = 28.6°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001) h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.955, Tmax = 0.978 k = −7→7
4888 measured reflections l = −18→17

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.068 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.238 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1499P)2 + 0.2282P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1062 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
64 parameters Δρmax = 0.78 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.57 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.13427 (18) 0.25931 (18) 0.81226 (8) 0.0558 (5)
O1 0.3782 (5) 0.6780 (5) 0.9199 (2) 0.0540 (8)
C1 −0.0936 (7) 0.0712 (6) 0.8176 (3) 0.0517 (9)
H1 −0.1261 −0.0467 0.7714 0.062*
C2 0.0689 (6) 0.3977 (5) 0.9156 (2) 0.0379 (7)
C3 0.2074 (6) 0.5981 (5) 0.9569 (2) 0.0390 (8)
C4 −0.1243 (5) 0.3053 (5) 0.9539 (2) 0.0366 (7)
C5 −0.2363 (6) 0.1035 (5) 0.8983 (2) 0.0421 (8)
H5 −0.3675 0.0174 0.9120 0.050*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0531 (8) 0.0612 (8) 0.0549 (8) −0.0008 (4) 0.0137 (5) −0.0091 (4)
O1 0.0442 (14) 0.0666 (17) 0.0540 (15) −0.0147 (12) 0.0175 (11) 0.0106 (13)
C1 0.0493 (19) 0.0468 (19) 0.058 (2) −0.0021 (15) 0.0037 (16) −0.0143 (16)
C2 0.0371 (15) 0.0388 (16) 0.0384 (15) 0.0010 (12) 0.0079 (12) 0.0028 (12)
C3 0.0345 (15) 0.0416 (16) 0.0413 (16) −0.0041 (13) 0.0066 (12) 0.0096 (13)
C4 0.0339 (16) 0.0348 (15) 0.0406 (17) −0.0034 (12) 0.0037 (13) 0.0043 (12)
C5 0.0534 (19) 0.0295 (14) 0.0394 (16) 0.0089 (13) −0.0091 (14) −0.0053 (12)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

S1—C1 1.691 (4) C2—C3 1.467 (5)
S1—C2 1.700 (3) C3—C4i 1.468 (5)
O1—C3 1.232 (4) C4—C3i 1.468 (5)
C1—C5 1.455 (5) C4—C5 1.486 (4)
C1—H1 0.9300 C5—H5 0.9300
C2—C4 1.374 (4)
C1—S1—C2 91.10 (17) O1—C3—C4i 123.0 (3)
C5—C1—S1 116.6 (3) C2—C3—C4i 114.0 (3)
C5—C1—H1 121.7 C2—C4—C3i 121.3 (3)
S1—C1—H1 121.7 C2—C4—C5 114.7 (3)
C4—C2—C3 124.7 (3) C3i—C4—C5 124.0 (3)
C4—C2—S1 113.5 (3) C1—C5—C4 104.2 (3)
C3—C2—S1 121.8 (2) C1—C5—H5 127.9
O1—C3—C2 123.0 (3) C4—C5—H5 127.9

Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C5—H5···O1ii 0.93 2.44 3.319 (4) 158

Symmetry code: (ii) x−1, y−1, z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: RN2094).

References

  1. Beimlung, P. & Kossmehl, G. (1986). Chem. Ber. 119, 3198–3203.
  2. Bruker (2009). SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Bruker (2010). APEX2 Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Hundt, N., Palaniappan, K., Servello, J., Dei, D. K., Stefan, M. C. & Biewer, M. C. (2009). Org. Lett. 11, 4422-4425. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Janiak, C. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3885–2896.
  6. Palmer, D. (2009). CrystalMaker CrystalMaker Software Ltd, Oxford, England.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2001). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Sinnokrot, M. O., Valeev, E. F. & Sherrill, C. D. (2002). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 10887–10893. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Slocum, D. W. & Gierer, P. L. (1976). J. Org. Chem. 41, 3668–3673.
  11. Subramaniyan, S., Xin, H., Kim, F. S. & Jenekhe, S. A. (2011). Macromolecules, 44, 6245–6248.
  12. Yamamoto, T., Tokimitsu, R., Asao, T., Iijima, T., Fukumoto, H., Koizumi, T., Fukuda, T. & Ushijima, H. (2011). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 212, 2406–2416.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015826/rn2094sup1.cif

e-68-o1428-sup1.cif (11.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015826/rn2094Isup2.hkl

e-68-o1428-Isup2.hkl (52.6KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015826/rn2094Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES