Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Apr 25;68(Pt 5):o1524. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812017254

Bis(2-amino­pyridinium) 2,5-dicarb­oxy­benzene-1,4-dicarboxyl­ate

V H Rodrigues a,*, Mohammad Hakimi b, Elham Motieiyan b
PMCID: PMC3344628  PMID: 22590390

Abstract

In the title compound, 2C5H7N2 +·C10H4O8 2−, the 2-amino­pyridinium (2-apyH) cation and 2,5-dicarb­oxy­benzene-1,4-dicarboxyl­ate (btcH2) anion are both nearly planar, with r.m.s. deviations of 0.015 and 0.050 Å, respectively. The angle between the latter least-squares planes is 17.68 (9)°. The overall crystal structure results from the packing of two-dimensional networks, formed by alternating 2-apyH and btcH2 linked by hydrogen bonds, parallel to (100).

Related literature  

For similar and most common conformations of 2-amino­pyridinium, see: Guelmami & Jouini (2011); Chitra et al. (2008); Quah et al. (2008); Bis & Zaworotko (2005); Büyükgüngör & Odabas˛ogˇlu (2002); Odabas˛ogˇlu et al. (2003); Acheson (1967). For similar and most common conformations of 2,5-dicarb­oxy­benzene-1,4-dicarboxyl­ate, see: Dong et al. (2011); Wang & Tang (2010). For graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals, see: Etter et al. (1990). graphic file with name e-68-o1524-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • 2C5H7N2 +·C10H4O8 2−

  • M r = 442.38

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 4.0165 (1) Å

  • b = 10.8098 (4) Å

  • c = 21.4036 (7) Å

  • β = 99.535 (2)°

  • V = 916.45 (5) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.13 mm−1

  • T = 273 K

  • 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.15 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) T min = 0.755, T max = 1.000

  • 18838 measured reflections

  • 2209 independent reflections

  • 1652 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.024

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037

  • wR(F 2) = 0.102

  • S = 1.01

  • 2209 reflections

  • 158 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker–Nonius, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880sup1.cif

e-68-o1524-sup1.cif (20.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880Isup2.hkl

e-68-o1524-Isup2.hkl (108.7KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O2 0.913 (16) 1.904 (17) 2.7852 (15) 161.6 (15)
N1—H1A⋯O1 0.913 (16) 2.478 (16) 3.2413 (16) 141.4 (13)
N2—H2A⋯O3i 0.831 (19) 2.125 (19) 2.9520 (17) 173.0 (17)
N2—H2B⋯O1 0.880 (19) 2.14 (2) 2.9759 (17) 157.6 (16)
O4—H4A⋯O1 1.06 (2) 1.31 (2) 2.3766 (15) 176.8 (17)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funds from FEDER via the COMPETE (Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade) programme and by the FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) (project PEst-C/FIS/UI0036/2011).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

This work is a further contribution to the broad family of structural studies of 2-aminopyridinium (2-apyH) systems with hydrogen-bond donors. A considerable number of analogous materials formed from 2-aminopyridine and a given carboxylic acid has already been reported (Guelmami & Jouini, 2011; Chitra et al., 2008; Quah et al., 2008; Bis & Zaworotko, 2005; Büyükgüngör & Odabas˛ogˇlu, 2002; Odabas˛ogˇlu et al., 2003; etc). This is due to the fact that 2-aminopyridine is protonated in acidic solutions. It is well known that the bonding of the H atom to the ring N atom of 2-aminopyridine, and not to the amino N atom, produces an ion for which an additional resonance structure must be considered (Acheson, 1967). We have inferred the positive charge in the 2-apyH ion lies on the amino group based on a difference fourier map, a common practice when allowed by the quality of the collected intensities. The charge state, related to the hydrogen loss, in each of the two candidate carboxylic acid groups belonging to the assymetric unit was also inferred from a difference map and further reinforced by analysis of the C–O bond lengths.

Ellucidation of the numbering scheme and a view of the H-bonds giving rise to two-dimensional networks parallel to (100) are shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. Both the 2-apyH cation and 2,5-dicarboxybenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate (btcH2) anion are nearly planar, with r.m.s. deviations of 0.015 and 0.050 A, respectively. The angle between the latter idealized planes is 17.68 (9)°. The two-dimensional networks are formed by alternating 2-apyH and btcH2 linked by H-bonds and include all H-bonds found. The first order network describing the H-bonding in the title compound is N1=4DS(7), as established by applying the rules of graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals (Etter et al., 1990).

Similar and most common conformations of 2,5-dicarboxybenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate were described by Dong et al. (2011) and Wang & Tang (2010).

Experimental

A solution of 0.254 g (1 mmol) benzene-1,2,4,5-tetracarboxylicacid in methanol (10 ml) was added to a solution of 2-aminopyridine (0.1 g, 1 mmol) in water (15 ml), and refluxed for 1 h. The resulting solution was light yellow in colour. After slow evaporation of the solvent at room-temperature colorless prisms of the compound were obtained.

Refinement

The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008). H atoms bound to aromatic C were placed at idealized positions and refined as riding, with C—H=0.93 (Sheldrick, 2008); amine and carboxyl H atoms were found from a difference fourier map and their coordinates refined freely. Uiso(H) was fixed to 1.2 times Ueq of the heavy atom they are bonded to, for all hydrogen atoms.

Examination of the crystal structure with PLATON (Spek, 2009) showed that there are no solvent-accessible voids in the crystal lattice.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

ORTEPII plot of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Representation of the two-dimensional networks, paralell to the (100) planes, of H-bonded molecules.

Crystal data

2C5H7N2+·C10H4O82 F(000) = 460
Mr = 442.38 Dx = 1.603 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 7209 reflections
a = 4.0165 (1) Å θ = 2.7–24.9°
b = 10.8098 (4) Å µ = 0.13 mm1
c = 21.4036 (7) Å T = 273 K
β = 99.535 (2)° Block, yellow
V = 916.45 (5) Å3 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.15 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer 2209 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1652 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.024
φ and ω scans θmax = 28.2°, θmin = 1.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) h = −4→5
Tmin = 0.755, Tmax = 1.000 k = −13→14
18838 measured reflections l = −27→23

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.102 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0519P)2 + 0.1584P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2209 reflections Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
158 parameters Δρmin = −0.15 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.014 (3)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 1.1547 (3) 0.04940 (11) 0.38178 (5) 0.0424 (3)
H1A 1.040 (4) 0.1095 (15) 0.3993 (8) 0.051*
C1 1.1679 (3) 0.04905 (12) 0.32019 (6) 0.0370 (3)
N2 1.0229 (4) 0.14007 (12) 0.28496 (6) 0.0511 (3)
H2A 1.021 (4) 0.1363 (16) 0.2461 (9) 0.061*
H2B 0.916 (5) 0.1990 (16) 0.3019 (9) 0.061*
C3 1.3390 (4) −0.04878 (13) 0.29700 (7) 0.0469 (4)
H3 1.3508 −0.0532 0.2540 0.056*
C4 1.4882 (4) −0.13741 (15) 0.33704 (9) 0.0569 (4)
H4 1.6042 −0.2019 0.3215 0.068*
C5 1.4684 (4) −0.13228 (16) 0.40058 (9) 0.0587 (4)
H5 1.5712 −0.1922 0.4285 0.070*
C6 1.2984 (4) −0.03922 (15) 0.42096 (7) 0.0523 (4)
H6 1.2786 −0.0356 0.4636 0.063*
C7 0.7030 (3) 0.40755 (11) 0.52514 (6) 0.0325 (3)
H7 0.8444 0.3440 0.5427 0.039*
C8 0.5869 (3) 0.40386 (11) 0.46123 (5) 0.0312 (3)
C9 0.7148 (3) 0.29317 (12) 0.42838 (6) 0.0380 (3)
O1 0.6529 (3) 0.28618 (10) 0.36938 (5) 0.0588 (3)
O2 0.8806 (3) 0.21344 (9) 0.45984 (5) 0.0591 (3)
C10 0.3760 (3) 0.50071 (11) 0.43487 (5) 0.0315 (3)
C11 0.2130 (3) 0.52081 (12) 0.36717 (6) 0.0386 (3)
O3 0.0283 (3) 0.60888 (10) 0.35332 (5) 0.0571 (3)
O4 0.2721 (3) 0.44339 (10) 0.32502 (4) 0.0556 (3)
H4A 0.448 (5) 0.3738 (17) 0.3439 (8) 0.067*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.0464 (7) 0.0473 (7) 0.0338 (6) −0.0050 (5) 0.0072 (5) −0.0078 (5)
C1 0.0391 (7) 0.0395 (7) 0.0316 (7) −0.0064 (5) 0.0038 (5) −0.0049 (5)
N2 0.0690 (9) 0.0481 (7) 0.0339 (6) 0.0058 (6) 0.0017 (6) −0.0040 (6)
C3 0.0463 (8) 0.0510 (9) 0.0452 (8) −0.0037 (7) 0.0129 (6) −0.0118 (7)
C4 0.0450 (8) 0.0447 (8) 0.0820 (12) 0.0006 (7) 0.0131 (8) −0.0058 (8)
C5 0.0511 (9) 0.0552 (9) 0.0664 (11) −0.0078 (7) 0.0001 (8) 0.0187 (8)
C6 0.0516 (9) 0.0648 (10) 0.0387 (8) −0.0144 (8) 0.0025 (7) 0.0090 (7)
C7 0.0367 (6) 0.0310 (6) 0.0303 (6) −0.0027 (5) 0.0067 (5) 0.0019 (5)
C8 0.0349 (6) 0.0316 (6) 0.0284 (6) −0.0069 (5) 0.0091 (5) −0.0015 (5)
C9 0.0437 (7) 0.0364 (7) 0.0351 (7) −0.0050 (6) 0.0102 (6) −0.0056 (5)
O1 0.0832 (8) 0.0600 (7) 0.0336 (6) 0.0173 (6) 0.0113 (5) −0.0114 (5)
O2 0.0841 (8) 0.0469 (6) 0.0453 (6) 0.0203 (6) 0.0074 (5) −0.0048 (5)
C10 0.0358 (6) 0.0336 (6) 0.0259 (6) −0.0087 (5) 0.0069 (5) 0.0005 (5)
C11 0.0451 (7) 0.0429 (7) 0.0275 (6) −0.0065 (6) 0.0055 (5) 0.0006 (5)
O3 0.0777 (7) 0.0550 (7) 0.0336 (6) 0.0151 (6) −0.0053 (5) 0.0017 (4)
O4 0.0763 (8) 0.0634 (7) 0.0257 (5) 0.0096 (6) 0.0045 (5) −0.0065 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

N1—C1 1.3281 (17) C6—H6 0.9300
N1—C6 1.3392 (19) C7—C8 1.3707 (17)
N1—H1A 0.913 (16) C7—C10i 1.3809 (17)
C1—N2 1.3154 (19) C7—H7 0.9300
C1—C3 1.3964 (19) C8—C10 1.4049 (18)
N2—H2A 0.831 (19) C8—C9 1.5197 (17)
N2—H2B 0.880 (19) C9—O2 1.2212 (16)
C3—C4 1.357 (2) C9—O1 1.2483 (16)
C3—H3 0.9300 C10—C7i 1.3809 (17)
C4—C5 1.377 (2) C10—C11 1.5037 (17)
C4—H4 0.9300 C11—O3 1.2133 (17)
C5—C6 1.329 (2) C11—O4 1.2811 (16)
C5—H5 0.9300 O4—H4A 1.06 (2)
C1—N1—C6 122.39 (13) C5—C6—H6 119.1
C1—N1—H1A 121.0 (10) N1—C6—H6 119.1
C6—N1—H1A 116.6 (10) C8—C7—C10i 124.36 (12)
N2—C1—N1 118.70 (13) C8—C7—H7 117.8
N2—C1—C3 124.06 (13) C10i—C7—H7 117.8
N1—C1—C3 117.24 (13) C7—C8—C10 117.52 (11)
C1—N2—H2A 117.8 (12) C7—C8—C9 113.54 (11)
C1—N2—H2B 120.4 (12) C10—C8—C9 128.93 (11)
H2A—N2—H2B 121.5 (17) O2—C9—O1 120.93 (12)
C4—C3—C1 120.15 (14) O2—C9—C8 119.73 (11)
C4—C3—H3 119.9 O1—C9—C8 119.33 (12)
C1—C3—H3 119.9 C7i—C10—C8 118.12 (11)
C3—C4—C5 120.25 (15) C7i—C10—C11 112.67 (11)
C3—C4—H4 119.9 C8—C10—C11 129.20 (11)
C5—C4—H4 119.9 O3—C11—O4 121.18 (12)
C6—C5—C4 118.13 (15) O3—C11—C10 119.99 (12)
C6—C5—H5 120.9 O4—C11—C10 118.83 (12)
C4—C5—H5 120.9 C11—O4—H4A 112.5 (9)
C5—C6—N1 121.83 (15)
C6—N1—C1—N2 −179.42 (13) C10—C8—C9—O2 −175.39 (13)
C6—N1—C1—C3 0.14 (19) C7—C8—C9—O1 −173.10 (12)
N2—C1—C3—C4 178.46 (14) C10—C8—C9—O1 5.7 (2)
N1—C1—C3—C4 −1.1 (2) C7—C8—C10—C7i −0.56 (18)
C1—C3—C4—C5 0.8 (2) C9—C8—C10—C7i −179.36 (11)
C3—C4—C5—C6 0.5 (2) C7—C8—C10—C11 −179.96 (11)
C4—C5—C6—N1 −1.4 (2) C9—C8—C10—C11 1.2 (2)
C1—N1—C6—C5 1.1 (2) C7i—C10—C11—O3 −1.71 (17)
C10i—C7—C8—C10 0.60 (19) C8—C10—C11—O3 177.72 (13)
C10i—C7—C8—C9 179.58 (11) C7i—C10—C11—O4 178.55 (12)
C7—C8—C9—O2 5.76 (17) C8—C10—C11—O4 −2.01 (19)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1A···O2 0.913 (16) 1.904 (17) 2.7852 (15) 161.6 (15)
N1—H1A···O1 0.913 (16) 2.478 (16) 3.2413 (16) 141.4 (13)
N2—H2A···O3ii 0.831 (19) 2.125 (19) 2.9520 (17) 173.0 (17)
N2—H2B···O1 0.880 (19) 2.14 (2) 2.9759 (17) 157.6 (16)
O4—H4A···O1 1.06 (2) 1.31 (2) 2.3766 (15) 176.8 (17)

Symmetry code: (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BT5880).

References

  1. Acheson, R. M. (1967). An Introduction to the Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, 2nd ed., pp. 215–218. London: Wiley.
  2. Bis, J. A. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2005). Cryst. Growth Des. 5, 1169–1179.
  3. Bruker (2003). SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Bruker–Nonius (2004). APEX2 Bruker–Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
  5. Büyükgüngör, O. & Odabas˛ogˇlu, M. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o691–o692. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Chitra, R., Roussel, P., Capet, F., Murli, C. & Choudhury, R. R. (2008). J. Mol. Struct. 891, 103–109.
  7. Dong, G.-Y., Liu, T.-F., He, C.-H., Deng, X.-C. & Shi, X.-G. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Guelmami, L. & Jouini, A. (2011). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 41, 1268–1272.
  10. Odabasoglu, M., Büyükgüngör, O., Turgut, G., Karadag, A., Bulak, E. & Lönneçke, P. (2003). J. Mol. Struct. 648, 133–138.
  11. Quah, C. K., Jebas, S. R. & Fun, H.-K. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o2230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, Y.-J. & Tang, L.-M. (2010). Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 29, 102–108.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880sup1.cif

e-68-o1524-sup1.cif (20.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880Isup2.hkl

e-68-o1524-Isup2.hkl (108.7KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES