Abstract
Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum are the two main fungal causal agents of Petri disease and esca. Both diseases cause significant economic losses to viticulturalists. Since no curative control measures are known, proactive defensive measures must be taken. An important aspect of current research is the development of sensitive and time-saving protocols for the detection and identification of these pathogens. Real-time PCR based on the amplification of specific sequences is now being used for the identification and quantification of many infective agents. The present work reports real-time PCR protocols for identification of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum. Specificity was demonstrated against purified DNA from 60 P. chlamydospora isolates or 61 P. aleophilum isolates, and no amplification was obtained with 54 nontarget DNAs. The limits of detection (i.e., DNA detectable in 95% of reactions) were around 100 fg for P. chlamydospora and 50 fg for P. aleophilum. Detection was specific and sensitive for P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum. Spores of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum were detected without the need for DNA purification. The established protocols detected these fungi in wood samples after DNA purification. P. chlamydospora was detectable without DNA purification and isolation in 67% of reactions. The detection of these pathogens in wood samples has great potential for use in pathogen-free certification schemes.
INTRODUCTION
Phaeoacremonium species and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora are the main fungal causal agents of Petri disease and esca (24). Phaeoacremonium spp. were associated especially with grapevine diseases and disease symptoms of a number of woody hosts, including oak (Quercus sp.), ash (Fraxinus sp.), willow (Salix sp.), olive (Olea europea), apricot (Prunus armeniaca), cherry (Prunus avium), kiwifruit (Actinidia sp.), and date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) trees (8, 9, 11, 16, 20, 23) as well as being associated with human infections called phaeohyphomycoses (defined as tissue invasion by fungi with melanized cell walls) (18). Phaeoacremonium spp. have a worldwide distribution. Since 1996, the number of known species associated with Petri and esca disease has increased quickly (8, 10, 13, 16). To date, 34 species of the anamorph genus Phaeoacremonium have been described, of which 12 were linked to Togninia teleomorphs (9, 23). The molecular characteristics of the β-tubulin and actin genes have played an important role in the detection and identification of Phaeoacremonium spp. (23). The occurrence of Phaeoacremonium spp. varies among grape-growing countries, with P. aleophilum the species most frequently found to affect grapevines worldwide (23, 13, 22). It was suggested that this pathogen disseminated from one host to another, such as kiwifruit and Prunus sp. (9). P. chlamydospora is a haploid ascomycete fungus, and no teleomorph is known. Several genetic diversity studies have reported limited variation and support the presumed predominance of asexual reproduction (4, 5, 6, 27).
Petri disease affects mostly 1- to 5-year-old grapevines. The external symptoms include stunted growth, interveinal chlorosis, and decline. Dissected vines show brown xylem vessels, the result of tyloses, gums, and phenolic compounds being formed by the host in response to infection (24). Blocked xylem vessels accentuate water stress and lead to insufficient water and nutrient supplies to the vegetative parts of the plant. These, plus the production of phytotoxic metabolites (32), contribute to other symptoms appearing during periods of high water demand. The presence of symptoms in young vines supports the assumption that propagation provides a means for the fungus to spread (11, 17, 19). Esca is a complex disease associated with at least three species of fungi: P. chlamydospora, P. aleophilum, and Fomitiporia mediterranea (32). The disease affects mature vines and is associated with symptoms that can range from mild to severe and chronic. The severe form is characterized by a sudden wilting of the leaves in all parts of the infected vine and the shriveling of all fruit. Berry symptoms in chronically affected plants appear as superficial brown to purple spots scattered over the surface. Leaf symptoms involve interveinal chlorosis, as described for Petri disease. On the trunk, dark brown streaks appear along with pink-brown areas on the margin of necrotic tissues; white rot also occurs, which reduces the wood to a light-colored spongy mass. Petri disease and esca are grapevine diseases of worldwide importance. Outbreaks have been reported from France (20), California (31), Italy (27), Portugal (28), New Zealand (30), South Africa (19), Australia (11), and Spain (22).
The importance of grapevines to the economies of Spain, France, Italy, and other countries plus the recurrence of Petri disease and esca in recent years have stimulated research into these complex diseases. An improvement in the detection and identification of the causal pathogens would be an important step forward. The conventional methods used to identify P. chlamydospora and/or P. aleophilum in grapevines involve a combination of recognition of symptoms, fungal isolation, and morphological examination of fungi able to grow under laboratory conditions. However, symptoms can be unreliable, with some plants appearing asymptomatic for long periods, and distinguishing species based on their morphology is time-consuming and generally requires the destruction of part of the vines. There is therefore a need for an accurate, rapid, and affordable test to detect Petri disease and esca fungi based on molecular methods, such as PCR. Conventional PCR has been successfully used for detection of P. chlamydospora (33). A nested-PCR protocol for detecting species of Phaeoacremonium in plants also exists (2). Quantitative real-time SYBR green PCR techniques have also been investigated for the detection of P. chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium spp. (26), although the primers and probe used were based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region; this is now well known not to differentiate between Phaeoacremonium species. Edwards et al. (12) compared conventional PCR, nested-PCR, SYBR green PCR, and TaqMan PCR methods and concluded that nested-PCR and TaqMan PCR were the most sensitive methods for detecting P. chlamydospora, although further research was required to optimize their use.
The aim of the present study was to develop a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the detection of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum using real-time PCR. These two species represent around 16 to 18% of the 30 species associated with grapevine decay in Castilla y León, Spain (22). Once the PCR protocols were established with purified DNA from isolated fungi, as is usually done, attempts were made to detect these fungi in spore suspensions without DNA purification. Then to speed up the methodology, efforts were undertaken to eliminate the fungi cultivation. Isolation and identification steps were performed using directly infected wood chips, and then DNA purifications of such samples were assayed. Finally, to reduce the manipulation much more, wood chips were incubated in liquid medium, and this liquid was used as the DNA template in the TaqMan PCR.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fungal strains, culture media, and growth conditions.
Fungi were isolated from branches of adult grapevines and complete young vines affected with Petri disease, esca, or other types of grapevine decay. These were mainly collected in the Spanish region Castilla y León. This study included 60 P. chlamydospora and 61 P. aleophilum isolates. Sixty-one isolates of other species were used as controls. Fifteen grapevines gave both P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum isolates. For example, grape Y38 gave Y38-8-1c (P. chlamydospora) and Y38-5-3a (P. aleophilum). Twenty-five cultures were obtained from the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS Fungal Collection, Utrecht, The Netherlands). Tables S1, S2, and S3 in the supplemental material show the isolates' names and where they were obtained. All isolates were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 25°C in darkness. Mycelia were lyophilized and stored at −20°C.
DNA purification.
Around 60 mg of lyophilized mycelia was ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Genomic DNA was isolated using the DNeasy plant minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. DNA quantity and quality were determined using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE). DNA was amplified with the ITS5 and ITS4 primers (34) and/or Pch1 and Pch2 or Pal1N and Pal2 (33) to ensure the presence of amplifiable DNA.
Primers and probe design.
DNA from 35 P. chlamydospora isolates (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) was amplified using primers ITS4 and ITS5. PCR fragments (about 650 bp) were purified with the Illustra GFX PCR DNA and gel band purification kit (Amersham Biosciences, GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) and sequenced by the Instrumental Techniques Laboratory of the University of León (Spain). The DYEnamic ET dye terminator kit (MegaBACE, Amersham Biosciences) was used for the sequencing reaction; amplification was performed using an MJ Research PTC-200 thermocycler (Amersham Biosciences). The DNA sequences obtained were analyzed with a MegaBACE 500 sequencer. The completed sequences of the ITS region were read and edited using Chromas v. 1.45 software (Southport, Australia). Multiple alignments of the 529-bp sequences were carried out with ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/#) and showed only 2 bases that differed at positions 369 and 438, grouping the 35 isolates into two groups: group I (14 isolates) with bases T369 and T438 and group II (21 isolates) with bases A369 and C438 (6). Three sequences of each group were selected and deposited in NCBI under accession no. EU018412, EU018413, EU018414, EU018415, EU018416, and EU018417, respectively (6). The selection also considered the origin and the external symptom of the grapevine samples collected in Castilla y León. Consensus sequence was obtained from these sequences plus seven others (AF017652; AF266653; AF266656; AF266652; AF197987, and AF197986) from the GenBank database (National Center for Biotechnology Information [NCBI], Bethesda, MD).
DNA of 22 P. aleophilum isolates (see Table S2 in the supplemental material) was amplified using primers T1 (25) and Bt2b (15) of the β-tubulin gene. PCR fragments (about 650 bp) were purified, sequenced, and analyzed as described above. Five sequences were deposited in NCBI under accession no. JF275874, JF285876, JF275879, JF275877, and JF275878, respectively. They showed bases that differed at position 96, 365, or 464. The consensus sequence of P. aleophilum was obtained (652 bp) from these sequences plus eight others from NCBI (DQ173095, DQ173094, EU863466, EU863469, EU863472, EU863468, EU863467, and EU863470). The sequences of P. aleophilum and other species (P. scolyti, AY579293, EU128091, EU128088, EU260415, and AY579292; P. viticola, DQ173105, DQ173107, AF192391, and AF246816; P. hispanicum, HQ700718; P. iranianum, DQ173096, DQ173097, and DQ173098; and P. mortoniae, DQ173109, EF517921, EU863480, and EU863475) of the genera obtained from GenBank were used for the design of the primers.
Primers and probes were designed using Primer Express v.2.0 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and synthesized by MWG-Biotech AG (Ebensburg, Germany). Figure S1 in the supplemental material presents the sequences and the locality of the primers and probe designed in the ITS2 region and in the β-tubulin gene. TaqMan probes for P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum were labeled at the 5′ end with the fluorophores 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) and hexachlorofluorescein (HEX), respectively. Both probes were labeled on the 3′ end with the black hole quencher 1 (BHQ1) dye.
PCR conditions. (i) SYBR green PCR.
Reactions were performed in a final reaction volume of 20 μl containing Power SYBR-Green 1× PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.3 μM each primer, and 5 μl of DNA sample at different concentrations. Reactions were run in a 7500 real-time PCR system platform (Applied Biosystems) using the following standard program: 10 min at 95°C plus 50 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C.
(ii) TaqMan PCR.
PCR conditions and reagent concentrations were optimized to obtain the final parameters described below. Reactions were performed in 20-μl reaction volumes containing 1× TaqMan Universal PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.3 μM each primer, 0.15 μM TaqMan probe, and 5 μl of DNA template. In all PCR experiments, a positive control (P. chlamydospora CBS239.74 or P. aleophilum Y161-19-2a) and nontemplate control (NTC; water) were included to test PCR performance. Amplification products were analyzed using Sequence Detection System software v.1.2.3 (Applied Biosystems).
The efficiency of the P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum TaqMan PCR systems designed was calculated following the recommendations of Bustin et al. (5). The TaqMan PCR efficiency for each system was calculated taking into account the two different templates: purified genomic DNA and suspension of spores obtained from the same strain. The 10-fold serial dilutions from genomic DNA or the spore suspensions of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum were prepared from concentrated samples to obtain a broad range of dilutions. Each dilution was analyzed with the P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum TaqMan PCR assays in triplicate with 5 and 7 different isolates, respectively. P. chlamydospora CBS239.74 and P. aleophilum Y161-19-2a were analyzed to complete the TaqMan PCR assays with more repetitions of the lower dilutions corresponding to 54, 22, 11, and 1 fg DNA per reaction and 50, 25, 5, and 1 fg DNA per reaction, respectively. These dilutions were assayed 30-fold, as indicated in Tables 1 and 2. Similar dilution procedures were followed with spore studies (Tables 3 and 4). The serial dilutions of genomic DNA or spores were used to develop three TaqMan PCR assays that were made in different run times. The mean values of the threshold cycle (CT) obtained were plotted against the logarithm of the DNA concentration in the reaction in order to construct the standard curve. The slope of the standard curve was used to calculate PCR efficiency, applying the equation E = 10−1/slope − 1 (5). In the same way, the P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum TaqMan PCR systems were tested with a suspension of spores of P. chlamydospora CBS239.74 and P. aleophilum Y161-19-2a to confirm the development of the TaqMan PCR system using a suspension of spores as the template in the TaqMan PCR. The PCR efficiency was calculated as for the genomic DNA template.
Table 1.
Determination of the detection limits of the TaqMan PCR assay with genomic DNA from P. chlamydospora CBS239.74
fg/reaction | CT valuea | Signal ratiob |
---|---|---|
108,000,000 | 15.51 ± 0.29 | 9/9 |
10,800,000 | 17.38 ± 0.05 | 9/9 |
1,080,000 | 20.90 ± 0.05 | 9/9 |
108,000 | 24.51 ± 0.09 | 9/9 |
10,800 | 27.81 ± 0.05 | 9/9 |
1,080 | 31.92 ± 0.27 | 9/9 |
108 | 35.73 ± 0.48 | 9/9 |
54 | 36.81 ± 0.89 | 24/30 |
22 | 37.58 ± 0.99 | 18/30 |
11 | 37.42 ± 0.71 | 17/30 |
1 | 37.26 | 1/30 |
Cycle number at which fluorescence intensity equals a fixed threshold. Shown are mean values ± standard errors of the means. The results are the means of three independent experiments with three replicates each (first seven dilutions) or three independent experiments with 10 replicates each (last four dilutions). The linearity (R2) was 0.9988.
Number of positive results out of the total number of reactions.
Table 2.
Determination of the detection limits for the TaqMan PCR assay with genomic DNA from P. aleophilum Y161-19-2a
fg/reaction | CT valuea | Signal ratiob |
---|---|---|
5,000,000 | 22.00 ± 0.91 | 9/9 |
500,000 | 25.73 ± 0.91 | 9/9 |
50,000 | 29.22 ± 1.01 | 9/9 |
5,000 | 32.67 ± 1.54 | 9/9 |
500 | 36.17 ± 1.46 | 9/9 |
50 | 38.92 ± 1.06 | 29/30 |
25 | 38.90 ± 1.78 | 9/30 |
5 | 40.89 ± 0.98 | 7/30 |
1 | Undetectable | 0/30 |
Cycle number at which fluorescence intensity equals a fixed threshold. Shown are mean values ± standard errors of the means. The results are the means of three independent experiments with three replicates each (first five dilutions) or three independent experiments with 10 replicates each (last four dilutions). The linearity (R2) was 0.9974.
Number of positive results out of the total number of reactions.
Table 3.
Determination of the detection limits of the TaqMan PCR assay with spores from P. chlamydospora CBS239.74
No. of P. chlamydospora spores | CT valuea | Signal ratiob |
---|---|---|
28,000 | 25.48 ± 0.11 | 9/9 |
2,800 | 29.03 ± 0.07 | 9/9 |
280 | 32.98 ± 0.26 | 9/9 |
100 | 34.57 ± 0.38 | 9/9 |
50 | 35.41 ± 0.23 | 9/9 |
20 | 37.14 ± 0.07 | 27/30 |
10 | 37.26 ± 0.20 | 19/30 |
5 | 37.33 ± 0.30 | 6/30 |
1 | 39.58 | 1/30 |
Cycle number at which fluorescence intensity equals a fixed threshold. Shown are mean values ± standard errors of the means. The results are the means of three independent experiments with three replicates each (first five dilutions) or three independent experiments with 10 replicates each (last four dilutions). The linearity (R2) was 0.9944.
Number of positive results out of the total number of reactions.
Table 4.
Determination of the detection limits of the TaqMan PCR assay with spores from P. aleophilum Y161-19-2a
No. of P. aleophilum spores | CT valuea | Signal ratiob |
---|---|---|
30,000 | 25.92 ± 0.54 | 9/9 |
3,000 | 29.65 ± 0.63 | 9/9 |
300 | 32.87 ± 0.52 | 9/9 |
30 | 36.14 ± 0.68 | 29/30 |
15 | 37.19 ± 0.97 | 24/30 |
3 | 40.98 ± 2.11 | 21/30 |
1 | Undetectable | 0/30 |
Cycle number at which fluorescence intensity equals a fixed threshold. Shown are mean values ± standard errors of the means. The results are the means of three independent experiments with three replicates each (first three dilutions) or three independent experiments with 10 replicates each (last four dilutions). The linearity (R2) was 0.9879.
Number of positive results out of total number of reactions.
P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum spore preparation.
P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum spores were obtained from 1 to 2 cm of fungal mycelium grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (collected after approximately 1 month of growth). PDA plates were agitated with 1 ml of Milli-Q water, and the latter was sucked into and blown out of a pipette under sterile conditions to liberate the spores, which were then transferred to a tube for later counting using a Neubauer chamber (BlauBrand, Germany) or used as a DNA template (5 μl) in the TaqMan PCR. Spore concentrations were determined using the formula spores/ml = N × 25 × 104, with N the average spore number counted in each cell.
P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum detection in infected wood samples.
Twelve Vitis vinifera (cv. Tempranillo grafted onto 110R rootstocks) vines were inoculated with each of the P. chlamydospora isolates Y121-29-6c, Y116-18-3c, or Y106-4-3b, and 12 vines were inoculated with each of the P. aleophilum isolates Y108-2-2z, Y38-5-3z, or Y235-4-1w. Twelve control plants were inoculated with a sterile agar plug (PDA). For the inoculation, a wound was produced in the trunk of the vine, and an agar plug containing or not an actively growing culture of each isolates was placed on the wound and covered with Parafilm. All grapevines were maintained in a greenhouse at 20 to 25°C. After 4 months, the P. chlamydospora or P. aleophilum strain was reisolated and identified. Our experience demonstrated that these fungi could be reisolated 1 cm over the inoculation point, and incipient wood symptoms could be observed. The effectiveness of the inoculation was evaluated using the conventional method of fungus isolation (22), consisting of cutting six wood chips (approximate diameter of 1 to 2 mm and approximate length of 0.5 to 1 cm) that were placed on malt extract agar (MEA) plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 25°C in darkness until fungi grew to a size at which they could be isolated and placed on PDA plates. As described above, the PDA plates were incubated and the colonies that grew were morphologically and/or molecularly identified. The inoculated plants used in this study correspond to plants in which the inoculated fungi were isolated and identified from the six wood chips placed on MEA. Three wood chips were cut from four control plants and from four plants infected with each isolate. DNA purification was performed with one chip of each grapevine using the Qiagen kit as described above. The second chip from each was placed in a tube containing 150 μl of malt extract (ME) medium, and the third chip was incubated in 150 μl sterile water. After 2 days at 25°C in darkness, TaqMan PCR was performed under the conditions described above with 5 μl of purified DNA, 5 μl of the incubation ME, or 5 μl of the incubation water.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
Five new sequences of P. aleophilum isolates have been deposited in the NCBI database under accession no. JF275874, JF285876, JF275879, JF275877, and JF275878.
RESULTS
Selection of primer sets.
For the design of the primers and probe for P. chlamydospora, the DNA of 35 isolates was amplified using primers ITS4 and ITS5. A consensus sequence was obtained (528 bp) from these sequences plus seven others from NCBI. Two primer pairs were designed: one based on the ITS1 fragment and one based on the ITS2 fragment. Primer viability was tested in the SYBR green system with 60 P. chlamydospora isolates plus those of 16 other species (see Tables S1 and S3 in the supplemental material). The primer pair based on ITS1 amplified all target P. chlamydospora DNAs but also produced nonspecific reactions with nontargeted DNAs. The second primer pair amplified only the target DNA of P. chlamydospora (data not shown) and was therefore selected to be used in the TaqMan PCR system. The TaqMan probe pchITS439P was then designed based on the ITS2 fragment (primers pchITS417F and pchITS495R, generating a fragment of 78 bp [see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material]).
The design of the primers and probe for P. aleophilum was based on the alignment of β-tubulin gene sequences. The DNAs of 22 isolates of P. aleophilum were amplified using primers T1 and Bt2b, generating a sequence beginning at exon 2 and ending at exon 6 of the β-tubulin gene. A consensus sequence of 652 bp was obtained from the sequences of the 22 isolates plus others from the GenBank database. Alignment of the DNA sequences of P. aleophilum, P. scolyti, P. viticola, P. hispanicum, P. iranianum, and P. mortoniae allowed primer design. Three primer pairs were designed: one based on intron 1, one based on intron 1 to intron 2, and one based on intron 3 to intron 4. Primer viability was tested in the SYBR green PCR system with 22 P. aleophilum isolates plus those of 23 other species (see Tables S2 and S3 in the supplemental material). Only the primers based on intron 1 (primers palFI1 and palRI1, producing a fragment of 63 bp) amplified all 22 target DNAs. Thus, primer pair palFI1/palRI1 was selected to be used in the real-time PCR system, and the TaqMan probe palI1 was designed based on intron 1 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The two selected primer pairs yielded single amplicons of 78 bp and 63 bp, respectively, for P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum.
Specificity.
The selected systems were experimentally tested with purified DNA. The amplifiability of the DNA samples was checked by conventional PCR using ITS5 and ITS4 primers and/or the Pch1 and Pch2 or the Pal1N and Pal2. All fungus samples showed positive amplification, showing they were suitable for TaqMan PCR assays. The P. chlamydospora TaqMan PCR system successfully amplified the target DNA templates of 60 isolates of P. chlamydospora (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). No amplification was obtained with 54 nontarget DNA templates (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). The method was 100% specific. The P. aleophilum TaqMan PCR system successfully amplified the target DNA templates of 61 P. aleophilum isolates (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). No amplification was obtained with 54 non-P. aleophilum DNAs (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). The method was 100% specific.
Sensitivity.
The sensitivity of the TaqMan PCR assays was evaluated for P. chlamydospora CBS239.74 and for P. aleophilum Y161-19-2a isolates using purified DNA from mycelia of isolated fungi. Spore suspensions were also used directly as templates without any DNA extraction or purification. Assays were performed as three independent experiments with nine replicates for each dilution, except those containing <108 fg/reaction of P. chlamydospora DNA, <500 fg/reaction of P. aleophilum DNA, or <50 spores for P. chlamydospora or <300 spores for P. aleophilum (30 replicates). The following dilutions of P. chlamydospora DNA were used as templates: 108 × 106, 108 × 105, 108 × 104, 108 × 103, 108 × 102, 1,080, 108, 54, 22, 11, and 1 fg/reaction. The results obtained (Table 1) allowed standard curves to be plotted, defined by the equation y = −3.6282x + 42.8190, with a regression coefficient of close to 1 (R2 = 0.9988). This indicates a highly linear reaction and a system efficiency of 0.886. The limit of detection (LOD) was defined as the minimum level at which the analyte could be reliably detected with a probability of 95% (108 fg of DNA/reaction). However, the TaqMan PCR assay was able to detect about 10 fg/reaction of P. chlamydospora DNA in 57% of reactions.
The following dilutions of P. aleophilum DNA were used as templates: 500 × 104, 500 × 103, 500 × 102, 5,000, 500, 50, 25, 5, and 1 fg/reaction. The results obtained (Table 2) allowed standard curves to be constructed as above, defined by the equation y = −3.3166x + 44.5520, a regression coefficient (R2 = 0.9974), and a system efficiency of 1.002. The LOD was established at 50 fg/reaction. The TaqMan PCR assay was able to detect 5 fg/reaction of P. aleophilum DNA in 23% of reactions.
The following dilutions of P. chlamydospora spore suspension were tested without any DNA extraction: 28,000, 2,800, 280, 100, 50, 20, 10, 5, and 1 spore per reaction. The dilution curve for the number of P. chlamydospora spores was defined by the equation y = −3.5622x + 41.437, an R2 value of 0.9944, and a system efficiency of 0.909. The LOD was 50 spores. However, positive amplification was obtained with 10 spores in 63% of reactions (Table 3).
The following dilutions of P. aleophilum spore suspension were tested without any DNA extraction: 30,000, 3,000, 300, 30, 15, 3, and 1 spore per reaction. The dilution curve for the number of P. aleophilum spores was defined by the equation y = −3.6247x + 42.0951, an R2 value of 0.9879, and a system efficiency of 0.926. The LOD was 30 spores. However, positive amplification was obtained with three spores in 70% of reactions (Table 4).
Complementation of the spore assay using further strains.
Spores from 10 different isolates of P. chlamydospora (LR9a, INIA56b, V13-1a, S2-1-1, S5-3-1, Y38-8-1c, Y80-6-1b, Y105-3-2a, Y119-8-5b, and Y162-20-1) and 10 other isolates of P. aleophilum (CBS631.94, CLM51.6b, S4-3-1, Y38-5-3a, Y107-6-1b, Y179-17-1b, Y213-16-5a, Y230-3-2b, Y233-5-4b, and Y272-4-1) were obtained directly from PDA cultures (5 μl of liberated spore suspensions). All were successfully detected with the respective TaqMan PCR systems described above (data not shown).
Detection of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum in wood samples.
DNA purified from wood chips obtained from the grapevines inoculated with three different P. chlamydospora isolates showed CT values ranging from 17.94 ± 0.04 to 26.67 ± 0.02 for all samples. No amplification was observed with wood inoculated with a PDA plug containing no mycelium (Table 5). DNA purified from wood chips obtained from grapevines infected with three P. aleophilum isolates showed CT values ranging from 25.11 ± 0.26 to 34.00 ± 0.40 in 100% of reactions (Table 6); no amplification was obtained with the control vine. These results confirmed the above identification done using conventional methods consisting of the culturing of six wood chips in culture medium for each inoculated plant and morphological identification of the isolated fungi.
Table 5.
Detection of P. chlamydospora in wood chips
Treatment of wood chipsa |
CT value withb: |
||
---|---|---|---|
Purified DNA | 2 days of incubation |
||
ME medium | Water | ||
Inoculation with isolate: | |||
Y121-29-6c-5e | 17.94 ± 0.04 | 28.0 ± 1.19 | 35.6 ± 2.15 |
Y121-29-6c-8e | 18.18 ± 0.01 | 30.33 ± 0.15 | 29.68 ± 0.57 |
Y121-29-6c-9e | 18.22 ± 0.04 | 31.32 ± 0.17 | Undetectable |
Y121-29-6c-12e | 22.20 ± 0.06 | 34.37 ± 2.63 | 32.23 ± 0.21 |
Y116-18-3c-2 | 24.60 ± 0.03 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y116-18-3c-4e | 23.97 ± 0.04 | 36.21 ± 0.37 | 30.6 ± 5.44 |
Y116-18-3c-7e | 23.34 ± 0.04 | 29.91 ± 0.36 | 23.65 ± 5.45 |
Y116-18-3c-11e | 19.67 ± 0.10 | 25.53 ± 0.27 | Undetectable |
Y106-4-3b-3 | 26.76 ± 0.02 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y106-4-3b-4 | 24.11 ± 0.05 | 42.21 ± 9.18 | Undetectable |
Y106-4-3b-8 | 25.63 ± 0.02 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y106-4-3b-11 | 25.09 ± 0.04 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Sterile PDA (control) | Undetectable | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Shown are TaqMan PCR results with the pchITS417F/pchITS495R-pchITS439P system for wood samples inoculated with different isolates of P. chlamydospora and for control wood treated with sterile PDA.
Cycle number at which fluorescence intensity equals a fixed threshold. Shown are mean values ± standard errors of the means. The results obtained represent three replicates. The percentages of successful reactions with purified DNA, ME medium, and water were 100%, 67%, and 42%, respectively.
Table 6.
Detection of P. aleophilum in wood chips
Treatment of wood chipsa |
CT value withb: |
||
---|---|---|---|
Purified DNA | 2 days of incubation |
||
ME medium | Water | ||
Inoculation with isolate: | |||
Y108-2-2z-1 | 26.93 ± 0.26 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y108-2-2z-2 | 25.42 ± 0.13 | 34.12 ± 2.94 | Undetectable |
Y108-2-2z-4 | 29.29 ± 0.37 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y108-2-2z-5 | 28.94 ± 0.63 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y38-5-3z-4 | 31.08 ± 0.47 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y38-5-3z-5 | 25.11 ± 0.26 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y38-5-3z-6 | 31.27 ± 0.25 | 33.86 ± 0.60 | Undetectable |
Y38-5-3z-7 | 32.87 ± 0.37 | 34.23 ± 1.48 | Undetectable |
Y235-4-1w-1 | 34.00 ± 0.40 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y235-4-1w-3 | 26.02 ± 0.03 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y235-4-1w-5 | 26.72 ± 0.27 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Y235-4-1w-7 | 32.52 ± 0.58 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Sterile PDA (control) | Undetectable | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Shown are TaqMan PCR results with the palFI1/palRI1-palI1 system for wood samples inoculated with different isolates of P. aleophilum and for control wood treated with sterile PDA.
Cycle number at which fluorescence intensity equals a fixed threshold. Shown are mean values ± standard errors of the means. The results obtained represent three replicates. The percentages of successful reactions with purified DNA, ME medium, and water were 100%, 25%, and 0%, respectively.
Positive amplification of P. chlamydospora in 67% of reactions was obtained with wood chips incubated for 2 days in culture medium with no DNA purification (Table 5). The four grapevines inoculated with the Y121-29-6c isolate returned CT values ranging from 28.0 ± 1.19 to 34.37 ± 2.63, while only one sample of the four grapevines inoculated with Y106-4-3b was positive, as were three samples of the four grapevines inoculated with Y116-18-3c. When incubation was performed in water for 2 days, the amplification results were lower (positive detection in 42% of reactions), with better detection in the plant inoculated with P. chlamydospora Y121-29-6c and Y116-18-3c. Positive amplification of P. aleophilum DNA, with no DNA purification, was obtained with wood chips incubated for 2 days in culture medium in only 25% of reactions (Table 6). No amplification was seen when samples were incubated in water for 2 days. Isolate Y38-5-3z was detected in two of the four inoculated plants after incubation, while isolate Y235-4-1w was not detected. P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum were 100% successfully detected in wood chips after DNA purification as was also found with the conventional method. At least for the detection of P. chlamydospora, the incubation in culture medium could be used as a template without the need for DNA purification and fungus isolation.
DISCUSSION
The correct, fast, and sensitive identification of fungi involved in Petri disease and esca is a crucial precondition for the conduct of meaningful studies on the epidemiology of these species associated with destructive diseases of grapevines and other species. For this purpose, the most appropriate method is the use of DNA-based tools, such as conventional PCR (33), nested-PCR (2), and qualitative real-time PCR (3, 26). These techniques detect DNA from alive and/or dead cells, whereas only conventional methods allowed the selective detection of active cells able to grow on culture medium under laboratory conditions, a procedure that takes around 3 months for identification of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum. The P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum TaqMan systems described in this paper allowed the detection of the respective fungi. Identification of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum was also performed following the conventional methods with wood samples to confirm the fungus identification. Both methods gave positive results for all inoculated plants. Conventional methods take around 3 months to yield an estimation of active cells in culture media. The TaqMan systems quantified in a few hours the DNA present in each sample. Abbatecola et al. (1) and Retief et al. (29) used nested PCR to detect P. chlamydospora in grapevine rootstocks and in nurseries. However, real-time PCR proved more sensitive, and its results were more reproducible for these species (12) and also for others (21). The advantages of real-time PCR detection over conventional methods are its specificity, sensitivity, and speed. As with all PCR methods, however, the both purification of the DNA and primer design influence the efficiency of the reaction.
In the present work, a total of 54 nontarget DNA templates from more than 30 other pathogenic fungi species as well as Vitis vinifera were tested to check out specificity of the systems. The detection of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum was consistently specific (100%). In the case of Pheaoacremonium, other methods for detection and identification were described previously (3, 26), but only a few other fungal species were included to test specificity. Moreover, this method contributes mostly to the detection of the genera, since the ITS region was not suitable for Phaeoacremonium species-specific primer design (26), and degenerated primers were successfully designed for the amplification of nine species of Phaeoacremonium (3).
On average, the assays in this work have shown lower CT values than those in preceding surveys (3, 12, 26); these results suggest higher sensitivity of the primers and probes designed for both P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum. Sensitivity of the TaqMan PCR was evaluated using purified DNA and spore suspensions without any DNA purification. The detection limits for purified mycelial DNA were around 100 fg/reaction for P. chlamydospora and 50 fg/reaction for P. aleophilum. However, 11 fg/reaction of P. chlamydospora DNA was detected in 57% of reactions, and 5 fg/reaction of P. aleophilum DNA was detected in 23% of reactions. To date, similar sensitivity has been reported only with purified DNA of Phaeoacremonium parasiticum (3). Overton et al. (26) and later Edwards et al. (12) could only detect the DNA of P. chlamydospora spores after DNA purification. An important result of the present work was the detection of 50 spores in >95% (LOD) of reactions without any DNA extraction step. In the same way, 30 spores (LOD) of P. aleophilum were detected with the described TaqMan PCR systems without the need for DNA purification. The results were confirmed with spore suspensions of different isolates of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum.
Among the 30 species associated with grapevine decline, P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum represent around 16 to 18% of all isolates identified from grapevine samples analyzed at our laboratory (22). Both species P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum are associated with Petri disease and esca (1, 7, 8, 10, 11), although they have also been isolated from plants showing eutypa dieback symptoms (22). To facilitate the diagnosis and taking into account that P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum produce spores and mycelia at the same time, wood chip samples were incubated in liquids. These liquids were then used as the DNA template in the TaqMan PCR. At least for P. chlamydospora, the TaqMan PCR system provided positive signals in 67% and 42% of the samples incubated in culture medium and water, respectively. To our knowledge, with more or less success, this is the first report of the use of a TaqMan PCR system for P. chlamydospora detection in incubation liquid without DNA extraction and without a fungal isolation procedure. For P. aleophilum, the TaqMan PCR system only provided a positive signal in 25% of the samples incubated in culture medium; no signal was obtained after water incubation. Differences in detection were obtained depending on the inoculated isolates, although all were 100% detected in wood chips after DNA purification by TaqMan PCR and conventional isolation methods. More investigation is required to confirm these results as well as those obtained with P. aleophilum.
The detection methods described here are highly specific, sensitive, and robust enough for the detection of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum. The easy and rapid detection of few spores without DNA purification will be an important advantage to guarantee the pathogen-free status of the propagated material in grapevine nurseries. Because the pchITS439P and PalI1 TaqMan probes designed in this study were manufactured with different reporter dyes at the 5′ end (FAM and HEX, respectively), both species could be detected in the same sample in a duplex reaction, as previously described for some Phaeocremonium species (3). The diagnostic methods described here improve on previous techniques and have great potential for use in pathogen-free certification schemes. Detection of P. chlamydospora and P. aleophilum without the need for fungal isolation reduces analysis times and associated costs. Moreover, the results of this study can be applied to other woody hosts, such as kiwifruit or several Prunus species for which P. aleophilum has been reported as pathogen.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was partly funded by Project INIA RTA04-127. Rebeca Cobos and Laura Martín were supported by an Itacyl-PhD grant and project PTA-2003-01-01001, respectively. Maria Teresa Martín was supported by Contratos Doctores Sistema INIA-CCAA (37, DR07-0161).
Marta Hernández provided helpful insight.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 23 March 2012
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.
REFERENCES
- 1. Abbatecola A, Pollastro S, Pichierri A, Faretra F. 2006. Survey on the presence of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in grapevine rootstocks. J. Plant Pathol. 88:S31 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Aroca A, Raposo R. 2007. PCR-based strategy to detect and identify species of Phaeoacremonium causing grapevine diseases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:2911–2918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Aroca A, Raposo R, Lunello P. 2008. A biomarker for the identification of four Phaeoacremonium species using the β-tubulin gene as the target sequence. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 80:1131–1140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Borie B, Jacquiot L, Jamaux-Despréaux I, Larignon P, Péros JP. 2002. Genetic diversity in populations of the fungi Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum on grapevine in France. Plant Pathol. 51:85–96 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bustin SA, et al. 2009. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 55:611–622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cobos R, Martin MT. 2008. Molecular characterization of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora isolated from grapevines in Castilla y León (Spain). Phytopathol. Mediterr. 47:20–27 [Google Scholar]
- 7. Crous PW, Gams W. 2000. Phaeomoniella chlamydospora General et comb. nov., the causal organism of Petri grapevine decline. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 39:112–118 [Google Scholar]
- 8. Crous PW, Gam W, Wingfield MJ, Wyk PS. 1996. Phaeoacremonium gen. nov. associated with wilt and decline disease of woody host and human infection. Mycologia 88:786–796 [Google Scholar]
- 9. Damm U, Mostert L, Crous PW, Fourie PH. 2008. Novel Phaeoacremonium species associated with necrotic wood of Prunus trees. Persoonia 20:87–102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Dupont J, Laloui W, Magnins S, Larignon P, Roquebert MF. 2000. Phaeoacremonium viticola, a new species associated with esca of grapevine in France. Mycologia 92:499–504 [Google Scholar]
- 11. Edwards J, Pascoe IG. 2004. Occurrence of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum associated with Petri disease and esca in Australian grapevine. Australas. Plant Pathol. 33:273–279 [Google Scholar]
- 12. Edwards J, Constable F, Wiechel T, Salib S. 2007. Comparison of the molecular tests single PCR, nested PCR and quantitative PCR (SYBR-Green and TaqMan) for detection of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora during grapevine nursery propagation. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 46:58–72 [Google Scholar]
- 13. Essakhis S, Mugnai L, Crous PW, Gronewald JZ, Surico G. 2008. Molecular and phenotypic characterisation of novel Phaeoacremonium species isolated from esca diseased grapevines. Persoonia 21:119–134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Reference deleted.
- 15. Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1323–1330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gramaje D, Armengol J, Mohammadi H, Banihashemi Z, Mostert L. Novel Phaeoacremonium species associated with Petri disease and esca of grapevine in Iran and Spain. Mycologia 101:920–929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gramaje D, Armengol J. 2011. Fungal trunk pathogens in the grapevine propagation process: potential inoculum sources, detection, identification and management strategies. Plant Dis. doi:10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Guarro J, et al. 2003. Two cases of subcutaneous infection due to Phaeoacremonium spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1332–1336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Halleen F, Crous PW, Petrini O. 2003. Fungi associated with healthy grapevine cutting in nurseries with special reference to pathogens involved in the decline of young vines. Australas. Plant Pathol. 32:47–52 [Google Scholar]
- 20. Larignon P, Dubos B. 1997. Fungi associate with esca disease in grapevine. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103:147–157 [Google Scholar]
- 21. López-Enríquez L, Rodríguez-Lázaro D, Hernández M. 2007. Quantitative detection of Clostridium tyrobutyricum in milk by real-time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:3747–3751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Martin MT, Cobos R. 2007. Identification of fungi associated with grapevine decline in Castilla y León (Spain). Phytopathol. Mediterr. 46:18–25 [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mostert L, Groenewald JZ, Summerbell RC, Gams W, Crous PW. 2006. Taxonomy and pathology of Togninia (Diaporthales) and its Phaeoacremonium anamorphs. Stud. Mycol. 54:1–115 [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mugnai L, Granini A, Surico G. 1999. Esca (Black Measles) and brown wood-streaking: two old and elusive diseases of grapevines. Plant Dis. 83:404–418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. O'Donnell K, Cigelnik E. 1997. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:103–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Overton BE, Stewart EL, Qu X, Wenner NG, Christ BJ. 2004. Qualitative real-time PCR SYBR-Green detection of Petri disease fungi. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 43:403–410 [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pollastro S, Dongiovanni C, Abbatecola A, Faretra F. 2000. Observations on the fungi associated with esca and on spatial distribution of esca symptomatic plants in Apulian (Italy) vineyards. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 39:206–210 [Google Scholar]
- 28. Rego C, Oliveira H, Carvalho A, Phillips A. 2000. Involvement of Phaeoacremonium spp and Cylindrocarpon destructans with grapevine decline in Portugal. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 39:76–79 [Google Scholar]
- 29. Retief E, McLeod A, Fourie RH. 2006. Potential inoculums sources of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in South Africa grapevine nurseries. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 115:331–339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ridgway HJ, Sleight BE, Stewart A. 2002. Molecular evidence for the presence of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in New Zealand vineyards and its detection in grapevine wood using species specific PCR. Australas. Plant Pathol. 31:267–271 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Scheck HJ, Vasquez SJ, Gubler WD, Fogle D. 1998. First report of three Phaeoacremonium spp. causing young grapevine decline in California. Plant Dis. 82:590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Sparapano L, Bruno G, Granini A. 2000. Effect on plants of metabolites produced in culture by Phaeoacremonium aleophilum, Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum and Fomitiporia punctata. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 39:169–177 [Google Scholar]
- 33. Tegli S, Bertelli E, Surico G. 2000. Sequence analysis of ITS ribosomal DNA in five Phaeoacremonium species and development of a PCR-based assay for the detection of P. chlamydosporum and P. aleophilum in grapevine tissue. Phytopathol Mediterr. 39:134–149 [Google Scholar]
- 34. White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, p 315–322 In Innis M, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. (ed), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.