LETTER
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was described in 1978 and soon became recognized as the main complication of antimicrobial use. In fact, one of the major risk factors associated with this infection is the use of antimicrobial agents (1). Clindamycin was the first antibiotic to be related to an increase in the incidence of CDI followed by parenteral cephalosporins, especially cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. More recently, there has been a strong association between fluoroquinolone use and CDI, which is also reflected in the fact that the epidemic strain NAP1 (ribotype 027) is resistant to all fluoroquinolones (11).
We report the first documented case of in vivo selection of moxifloxacin resistance in C. difficile causing infection in a patient who had previously received fluoroquinolones.
The patient was a 78-year-old male with multimorbidity admitted for hip dislocation. At the time of admission, the patient already had diarrheal stools and developed recurrent pseudomembranous colitis during his hospital stay. A toxigenic C. difficile strain (isolate 1) was detected, by C. Diff Quick Check Complete dual-antigen enzyme-inmunoassay (D-EIA) (TechLab, Blacksburg, VA) and culture on selective CLO medium (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). MICs were determined by Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), yielding a wild-type phenotype, including susceptibility to metronidazole, vancomycin, and moxifloxacin and resistance to other fluoroquinolones (Table 1). The patient had received ciprofloxacin and rifampin 2 months before admission, followed by clindamycin and rifampin for an ankle infection. After the first episode of CDI, which was treated with metronidazole for 12 days, the patient also had a respiratory tract infection that was treated with levofloxacin for 2 weeks. Subsequently, a moxifloxacin-resistant (MIC > 32 μg/ml) C. difficile (isolate 2) was isolated and was responsible for two new recurrent episodes of CDI in the patient. The levofloxacin MIC had also increased significantly in isolate 2.
Table 1.
MICs of the antibiotics tested for the three C. difficile isolates
| Isolate | Date of isolation (day/mo/yr) | MIC (μg/ml)a |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTR | VAN | CLI | ERY | CIP | MOX | LEV | ||
| 1 | 20/04/2011 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 3 | 1 | >32 | 1 | 16 |
| 2 | 13/05/2011 | 0.064 | 0.5 | 4 | 2 | >32 | >32 | >32 |
| 3 | 07/06/2011 | 0.064 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | >32 | >32 | >32 |
MTR, metronidazole; VAN, vancomycin; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; MOX, moxifloxacin; LEV, levofloxacin.
Fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms were investigated through PCR amplification and sequencing of gyrA and gyrB (6). While wild-type sequences were obtained in isolate 1, isolate 2 showed the Thr82Ile substitution in GyrA, the most frequently described mutation in fluoroquinolone-resistant C. difficile, including the hypervirulent clone NAP1 (ribotype 027) (4, 5, 14, 15, 16). Moxifloxacin-susceptible and -resistant isolates showed an identical pattern in ribotyping analysis (2). Although we were not able to assign the strain to a known ribotype, perhaps due to the lack of enough control strains (ribotypes 001, 014, 027, and 078), it was identified as clone ST-122 through multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (8). This clone belongs to clade 2, the same clade as sequence type 1 (ST-1) (ribotype 027), but to our knowledge, so far it has not been related to resistance to fluoroquinolones.
Moxifloxacin resistance in C. difficile has increased dramatically in recent years, and this resistance is frequently associated with resistance to other fluoroquinolones, in particular to levofloxacin, showing high-level resistance (9, 14). Spigaglia et al. (15) demonstrated that moxifloxacin and levofloxacin are able to rapidly select C. difficile mutants in vitro that are highly resistant to fluoroquinolones, showing amino acid substitutions in GyrA and/or GyrB. Moreover, our work confirms that levofloxacin is able to select Thr82Ile GyrA mutants in vivo, conferring resistance also to new fluoroquinolones, such as moxifloxacin. Therefore, we must consider the possibility that the use of older fluoroquinolones may allow the emergence of C. difficile bacteria that are also resistant to newer fluoroquinolones and that this phenomenon probably promotes wide dissemination of this pathogen (3, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 27 February 2012
REFERENCES
- 1. Bartlett JG. 2010. Detection of Clostridium difficile infection. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 31(Suppl. 1):S35–S37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bidet P, Barbut F, Lalande V, Burghoffer B, Petit JC. 1999. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 175:261–266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Biller P, et al. 2007. Moxifloxacin therapy as a risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated disease during an outbreak: attempts to control a new epidemic strain. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 28:198–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Dridi L, Tankovic J, Burghoffer B, Barbut F, Petit JC. 2002. gyrA and gyrB mutations are implicated in cross-resistance to ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin in Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3418–3421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Drudy D, Kyne L, O'Mahony R, Fanning S. 2007. gyrA mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant Clostridium difficile PCR-027. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:504–505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Drudy D, et al. 2006. High level resistance to moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin associated with a novel mutation in gyrB in toxin-A-negative, toxin-B-positive Clostridium difficile. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58:1264–1267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gaynes R, et al. 2004. Outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection in a long term care facility: association with gatifloxacin use. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:640–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Griffiths D, et al. 2010. Multilocus sequence typing of Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:770–778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Huang H, et al. 2009. Clostridium difficile infections in a Shanghai hospital: antimicrobial resistance, toxin profiles and ribotypes. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 33:339–342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Loo VG, et al. 2005. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 353:2442–2449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. McDonald LC, et al. 2005. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 353:2433–2441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Muto CA, et al. 2005. A large outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated disease with an unexpected proportion of deaths and colectomies at a teaching hospital following increased fluoroquinolone use. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 26:273–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pépin J, et al. 2005. Emergence of fluoroquinolones as the predominant risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a cohort study during an epidemic in Quebec. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:1254–1260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Spigaglia P, et al. 2008. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Clostridium difficile isolates from a prospective study of C. difficile infections in Europe. J. Med. Microbiol. 57:784–789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Spigaglia P, Barbanti F, Louie T, Barbut F, Mastrantonio P. 2009. Molecular analysis of the gyrA and gyrB quinolone resistance-determining regions of fluoroquinolone-resistant Clostridium difficile mutants selected in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:2463–2468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Walkty A, et al. 2010. Molecular characterization of moxifloxacin resistance from Canadian Clostridium difficile clinical isolates. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 66:419–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]