Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2012 May;50(5):1684–1690. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00131-12

Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae Identification by Pherotype: a Method To Assist Understanding of a Potentially Emerging or Overlooked Pathogen

Marcus H Leung a, Clare L Ling a,*, Holly Ciesielczuk a,*, Julianne Lockwood a,*, Sarah Thurston b, Bambos M Charalambous a,, Stephen H Gillespie a,*
PMCID: PMC3347113  PMID: 22378913

Abstract

The recent identification of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae (pseudopneumococcus) has complicated classification schemes within members of the “mitis” streptococcal group. Accurate differentiation of this species is necessary for understanding its disease potential and identification in clinical settings. This work described the use of the competence-stimulatory peptide ComC sequence for identification of S. pseudopneumoniae. ComC sequences from clinical sources were determined for 17 strains of S. pseudopneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus oralis. An additional 58 ComC sequences from a range of sources were included to understand the diversity and suitability of this protein as a diagnostic marker for species identification. We identified three pherotypes for this species, delineated CSP6.1 (10/14, 79%), CSP6.3 (3/14, 21%), and SK674 (1/14, 7%). Pseudopneumococcal ComC sequences formed a discrete cluster within those of other oral streptococci. This suggests that the comC sequence could be used to identify S. pseudopneumoniae, thus simplifying the study of the pathogenic potential of this organism. To avoid confusion between pneumococcal and pseudopneumococcal pherotypes, we have renamed the competence pherotype CSP6.1, formerly reported as an “atypical” pneumococcus, CSPps1 to reflect its occurrence in S. pseudopneumoniae.

INTRODUCTION

The mitis group of streptococci includes nasopharyngeal colonizers such as Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and the recently classified Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae (2). Of these, S. pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is responsible for more than a million deaths annually and is responsible for diseases such as otitis media, pneumonia, septicemia, and meningitis. However, invasive diseases caused by other related viridans group streptococci had been documented (16, 26, 31).

Some strains of S. pseudopneumoniae, along with S. mitis and S. oralis, have often been classified previously as “atypical pneumococci,” because of their similarity to S. pneumoniae. These organisms share ≥99% identity in 16S rRNA gene sequences (2, 21, 43). Optochin sensitivity and bile solubility, the two standard pneumococcal phenotypic identification tests, have proven to be inconclusive for differentiating pneumococci from these atypical strains (3, 4, 9, 10, 17, 19, 20, 22, 27, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 49). Virulence factors that were once thought to be exclusive to the pneumococcus, such as pneumolysin (encoded by ply) and autolysin A (encoded by lytA), have been detected in commensal streptococcal species (18, 35, 49), compromising their specificity as species identification markers. The pathogenic potential of S. pseudopneumoniae (the pseudopneumococcus) has been demonstrated in a murine model (12) as well as in humans (2, 18, 23, 24, 28, 40). Rapid, correct identification of this organism in the clinical setting is essential for diagnosis and for understanding its disease potential. A simple, unequivocal method to identify S. pseudopneumoniae would be valuable.

Streptococci are competent for genetic transformation. In the case of S. pneumoniae, this is mediated by the competence-stimulatory peptide (CSP) encoded by the comC gene (13). CSP sequences differ between species and within species; different versions within species are known as pherotypes (48). We report the distribution of the comC sequence in strains of S. pseudopneumoniae and show that it may prove a valuable method to identify the organism rapidly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical specimens and bacteria.

A total of 17 clinical specimens of S. pseudopneumoniae, S. pneumoniae, and S. oralis were collected at the Royal Free Hospital Microbiology Laboratory between the years 1993 and 2010 (Table 1). Sixteen samples were from patients with lower respiratory tract (LRT) infections, and a single strain was isolated from a normally sterile site. Samples were plated on Columbia blood agar (Oxoid, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom) in 5% CO2 at 35°C in an attempt to cultivate bacteria, and colonies suggestive of pneumococci based on morphology and alpha-hemolysis were tested for optochin sensitivity.

Table 1.

Streptococcal strains included for this study

Species Strain Clinical isolation site Accession no.c Source or reference
S. pseudopneumoniae N452 Blood Not deposited This study
RFH504 LRTa Not deposited This study
RFH543 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH686 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH687 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH827 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH905 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH999 LRT Not deposited This study
874 Unknownb AJ240773 48
ATCC BAA-960 LRT Not deposited This study
IS7493 LRT YP004769537 40
PT5479 Naso/oropharynx Not deposited 41
PT5779 Naso/oropharynx Not deposited 41
SK674 Unknown Not deposited 25
S. pneumoniae RFH324 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH410 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH577 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH815 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH864 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH904 LRT Not deposited This study
VA1 Unknown AJ240789 48
41G Unknown AJ240766 48
CSP2.1b Nasopharynx Not deposited 46
Pn24 Unknown AJ240759 48
Pn59 Unknown AJ240793 48
Pn13 Unknown AJ240792 48
101/87 Unknown AJ240791 48
SK676 Unknown Not deposited 25
S. mitis Col15 Unknown AJ240762 48
Col16 Unknown AJ240763 48
NCTC 10712 LRT AJ240795 48
NCTC 12261 Naso/oropharynx AJ000875 15
B5 Unknown AJ000871 15
B6 Unknown AJ000865 15
Hu8 Unknown AJ000866 15
SK137 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK145 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK262 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK272 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK564 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK596 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK598 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK599 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK601 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK602 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK608 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK609 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK611 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK612 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK614 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK615 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK667 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK675 Unknown Not deposited 25
S. oralis RFH623 LRT Not deposited This study
RFH831 LRT Not deposited This study
Col19 Unknown AJ240794 48
NCTC 11427 Naso/oropharynx AJ000873 15
DSM 20066 Unknown AJ000874 15
SK153 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK305 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK34 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK39 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK571 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK597 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK610 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK92 Unknown Not deposited 25
S. gordonii NCTC 3165 Gum AJ000870 15
NCTC 7865 Endocardium X98110 14
NCTC 7868 Unknown X98109 14
S. infantis SK140 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK282 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK283 Unknown Not deposited 25
SK350 Unknown Not deposited 25
S. cristatus NCTC 12479 Unknown AJ000876 15
S. peroris ATCC 700780 Tooth EFX39822 NCBI genome
a

LRT, lower respiratory tract.

b

Unknown, isolation site not specified in previous publications or not available on ATCC or NCTC database.

c

Accession numbers are absent where strain sequences were under 200 bp and thus not deposited. Nucleotide sequences for pherotypes associated with strains characterized in this study are given in Table S2 in the supplemental material (pherotype CSPps1a is associated with S. pseudopneumoniae strains N452, RFH504, RFH543, RFH687, RFH905, and RFH999; pherotype CSPps2b is associated with S. pseudopneumoniae strains RFH686, RFH827, and ATCC BAA-960; pherotype CSP1c is associated with S. pneumoniae strains RFH324, RFH410, RFH577, RFH815, RFH864, and RFH904; and pherotype CSP6.2d is associated with S. oralis strains RFH623 and RFH831). Undeposited sequences for other strains listed are available in the indicated reference.

Genomic DNA extraction for amplification.

Genomic DNA from LRT samples was extracted by a modified Chelex method as described previously (47). The supernatant containing the DNA was used as the amplification template. For culture-positive clinical specimens, genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega) or by the heat lysis method (30).

Presumptive identification of S. pseudopneumoniae.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) using primers and probes specific for Spn9802 (1, 44) and lytA (5) was performed sequentially to differentiate between S. pneumoniae (both positive) and S. pseudopneumoniae (Spn9802 positive, lytA negative). To monitor PCR inhibition, a SPUD potato gene internal amplification control (IAC) was included in each reaction using primers targeting phyB of Solanum tuberosum (36). For lytA and Spn9802 qPCR assays, amplification reactions using 25-μl mixtures containing 1× Platinum quantitative PCR SuperMix-UDG (Invitrogen), a final concentration of 7 mM MgCl2, primers and probes, 4 × 10−7 μM IAC template DNA (Sigma-Aldrich), and 5 μl of template DNA (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) were performed. Negative and positive controls were performed for each qPCR assay. Amplification was performed using a Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen) with the following conditions: an initial hold cycle at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 45 s. The PCR data were acquired at the end of each cycle and analyzed by the instrument software (Qiagen). Samples with cycle threshold (CT) values ≤35 for the lytA or Spn9802 target were considered positive; samples that had no CT value for either the lytA or Spn9802 target but that did have a CT value ≤40 for the IAC target were considered negative, and samples with a no CT value for either the lytA or Spn9802 target and no CT value for the IAC target were considered inhibited. Samples positive for both lytA and Spn9802 were considered to be S. pneumoniae positives, and samples positive for Spn9802 and negative for lytA were considered to be presumptively S. pseudopneumoniae positive. All reactions were performed in triplicate.

Amplification of comC.

Forward and reverse primers were designed to bind comC at positions 592 to 611 and 873 to 892, respectively (accession number U33315). The primer sequences and primer reaction concentrations are indicated in Table S1 in the supplemental material. For strains grown on agar, genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial cells from a fresh overnight culture on Columbia blood agar by the heat lysis method as described previously (30). In addition to primers, each reaction mixture contained 2 μl of template DNA, 0.3 μl Taq polymerase (5 U/μl) (Invitrogen), 1× PCR buffer (10×), 3 μM MgCl2, and 0.6 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs; Promega), made up to a final volume of 50 μl with DNase/RNase-free distilled water (Gibco).

MLST.

The primers used for multilocus sequence typing (MLST) have been described previously (8). MLST was performed with the same reaction components and concentrations indicated for the comC amplification described above.

Amplicon purification and sequencing of comC and MLST loci.

Amplicons were analyzed with 1.5% (wt/vol) agarose gel electrophoresis. Amplicons with the expected band sizes were purified using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cycle sequencing and sequence analysis were performed in the same manner for both PCRs (see below). Purified DNA was sequenced using BigDye Sequencing Terminator v.3.1 (Applied Biosystems), and sequences were analyzed on the 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and viewed on Bionumerics software (version 5).

Publicly accessible sequences of streptococcal CSP.

Additional streptococcal ComC amino acid sequences were included in this study for the construction of a phylogenetic tree (see below). Sequences obtained from previous publications, with accession numbers, are indicated in Table 1. Sequences for which no accession numbers are listed have not been deposited in GenBank. The sequences can be found in the sources given in Table 1.

Construction of a comC phylogenetic tree.

Multiple alignment of comC sequences was constructed with ClustalW functionality on MEGA version 5.05 (45). For both analyses, neighbor-joining trees were constructed based on alignment data. Bootstrap support of 1,000 repetitions was performed.

RESULTS

S. pseudopneumoniae CSP sequences.

It was possible to identify ComC sequences for nine pseudopneumococcal strains where CSP sequences were derived directly from samples submitted to our laboratory from patients with LRT and invasive infections. These samples were presumed to contain pseudopneumococci based on either Spn9802-positive and lytA-negative qPCRs (eight strains), bile insolubility and optochin-variable phenotypic traits (one strain, N452), or MLST (one strain, N452). The pherotype of the control strain, ATCC BAA-960, was also characterized in this study. Two pherotypes were detected in these nine strains, six (N452, RFH504, RFH543, RFH687, RFH905, RFH999) of which were associated with CSP6.1. To avoid confusion with pherotypes of other oral streptococci, we propose that CSP6.1 be named CSPps1, where “ps” represents the pseudopneumococcus. The three remaining strains, BAA-960, RFH686, and RFH827, had a ComC sequence that has not been reported before; this sequence is identical to that of CSPps1 in size, differing by an alanine-to-serine substitution at position 12 of the propeptide. We propose that this pherotype be classified as CSPps2 (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Pherotypes of S. pseudopneumoniae CSP6.1, CSP6.3, and SK674. The mature region of the peptide is in boldface after the double glycine. CSP6.1 and CSP6.3 differ by a single amino acid at position 12 (alanine in CSP6.1 and serine in CSP6.3; underlined). SK674 is a presumptive pseudopneumococcus (25), with an extended ComC compared to CSP6.1 and CSP6.3, and shares higher identity to S. infantis SK350. A total of three pseudopneumococcal pherotypes were characterized.

CSP sequences of four strains (IS7493, PT5479, PT5779, and SK674) were available from reports in earlier publications (25, 41, 48). All but that of SK674 were identical to CSPps1. Thus, more than 70% of the presumptive S. pseudopneumoniae strains in this study were associated with CSPps1 (Table 2). SK674 has an extended ComC of 54 amino acids, most similar to a pherotype characterized in Streptococcus infantis SK350, with six amino acid substitutions, three of which are in the mature peptide region (25) (Fig. 1 and Table 2).

Table 2.

Distribution of pseudopneumococcal pherotypes

Pherotype No. of strains (% of 14) Strain(s)
CSP 6.1 (CSPps1) 10 (71) N452, RFH504, RFH543, RFH687, RFH905, RFH999, IS7493, 874, PT5479, PT5779
CSPps2 3 (21) BAA-960, RFH686, RFH827
SK674 1 (7) SK674

Phylogenetic analysis of streptococcal pherotypes.

A phylogenetic tree constructed from alignment of streptococcal pherotypes shows that, by pherotype, streptococci fall into two major groups (Fig. 2). S. pneumoniae, S. pseudopneumoniae, S. mitis, and some S. oralis strains belong to one group (group 1), while a more divergent and loosely defined group (group 2) consists of predominantly Streptococcus gordonii, S. infantis, Streptococcus peroris, Streptococcus cristatus, and most of the remaining S. oralis strains. SK674, formerly classified as a pseudopneumococcus (25), clustered near members of S. infantis by ComC alignment. All of the remaining S. pseudopneumoniae pherotypes are grouped in a separate cluster in close relation to other species, notably S. oralis and S. mitis (Fig. 2).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of ComC amino acid sequences of streptococcal species of the mitis group. Two clusters of ComC based on amino acid sequence similarities (groups 1 and 2) are separated by a dotted line. Each pherotype is labeled according to the classified species: filled circle, S. pseudopneumoniae; open square, S. pneumoniae; filled triangle, S. mitis; filled square, S. oralis; open circle, S. gordonii; open upright triangle, S. peroris; open diamond, S. infantis, open inverted triangle, S. cristatus. Asterisks indicate multiple strains of the same pherotype that have been compressed for clarity. Numbers of strains with the same pherotype are indicated in parentheses. Pseudopneumococcal strains of these groups are indicated in Table 2. The pneumococcal CSP1 pherotype includes strains VA1, RFH324, RFH410, RFH577, RFH815, RFH864, and RFH904. The pneumococcal CSP2.1 pherotype includes strains 41G and CSP2.1b. CSP6.2 pherotypes include SK671 (S. mitis), Col19 (S. oralis), RFH623 (S. oralis), and RFH831 (S. oralis). The phylogenetic tree was built with 1,000 bootstrap repetitions, with support over 80 indicated. The ruler indicates amino acid substitutions per site. The tree was constructed with MEGA 5.05.

DISCUSSION

We have characterized pherotypes associated with S. pseudopneumoniae by comparing strains available to us, amplifying sequences collected from lower respiratory tract samples and collecting publicly available ComC sequences for this organism and related streptococcal species. We have shown that CSP6.1 (or CSPps1) is the commonest pherotype among S. pseudopneumoniae strains found in different geographical regions. Pherotype CSP6.1 was previously considered to be a rare pherotype of an “atypical nontypeable pneumococcal” strain, 874, based on multilocus sequence analysis (33, 48). Its classification as a pneumococcus may stem from its possession of ply and lytA, which were once considered suitable genetic markers for this organism (33). However, it is known that these two genes are not specific to S. pneumoniae (18, 35, 49), and we have been unable to find a report of CSP6.1 being found in a strain unequivocally identified as S. pneumoniae. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that strain 874 is a strain of S. pseudopneumoniae. Pneumococcal strain 101/87, associated with CSP5, was described as an “atypical pneumococcus” and could not be serotyped by Whatmore et al. (48), and this strain is most likely to be S. pseudopneumoniae. Phylogenetic analysis of CSP sequences in this study suggests that CSP5 is most closely related to S. mitis or S. oralis pherotypes that cluster together. Thus, we believe that CSP6.1 is associated with S. pseudopneumoniae and that, to differentiate pseudopneumococcal pherotypes from ComC sequences from other organisms, they should be designated CSPps1 instead of CSP6.1.

In this study we have identified a new pherotype associated with S. pseudopneumoniae and have designated this CSPps2. S. pseudopneumoniae pherotypes form a distinct cluster within those of other oral streptococcal species, suggesting that pseudopneumococcal pherotypes could be species specific and could be used as a simple diagnostic tool.

In contrast, strain SK674, a S. pseudopneumoniae strain identified based on clustering of housekeeping gene sequences (25), clustered closely in ComC sequences of S. infantis strains. One might argue that SK674 acquired a divergent comC from S. infantis by horizontal gene transfer. While interspecies transfer of the competence operon has been documented (15), the lack of such an event in our collection of over 200 pneumococcal strains indicates that this is relatively rare (our unpublished data). SK674 has a genome size of 1.87 Mbp (25), comparable to those of other S. infantis strains (1.74 to 1.88 Mbp) and much smaller than the genome size of the pseudopneumococcal strain IS7493 (2.1 Mbp) (40). It seems that the alternative explanation, that SK674 is actually a strain of S. infantis, is more likely. Additional analysis of SK674, such as DNA-DNA hybridization and lytA sequence analysis, may shed light as to the true identity of this strain.

From the recently characterized genome sequence of S. pseudopneumoniae strain IS7493, it was concluded that CSP-mediated induction of fratricide does not take place based on the absence of comC in this strain (40). We were, however, able to locate the gene that is identical to that of CSPps1. Thus, we can conclude that this S. pseudopneumoniae strain does contain the necessary gene sequences for production of a competence peptide and that a homologous gene is found in all pseudopneumococcal strains analyzed thus far, strengthening the use of this gene as a diagnostic marker.

S. pseudopneumoniae is usually identified as acapsulate, bile insoluble, and intermediately optochin resistant in 5% CO2 and optochin susceptible in ambient O2 (2). These tests can be difficult to standardize in the laboratory. Identification by comC sequencing would allow a rapid method of definitive diagnosis as the competence ligand gene is conserved across streptococcal species and the pseudopneumococcal comC sequences appear to provide taxonomic information, similar to the case of gyr in Serratia species (6). Previously reported genetic approaches to differentiate S. pseudopneumoniae from S. pneumoniae relied on targeting lytA, cpsA, aliB-like ORF2, ply, psaA, Spn9802, and sodA (2, 5, 7, 16, 24, 37, 42, 44); however, these are inconclusive. While multilocus sequence analysis can reveal divergence between species by their housekeeping and virulence gene fragments (11, 25), these methods are too cumbersome for large-scale and routine clinical diagnosis. Recent accounts of detection of pseudopneumococcus in carriage and symptomatic hosts with antibiotic resistance necessitate its accurate diagnosis as an emerging causative agent of disease (23). A recent report suggested that sequencing recA could differentiate between S. pneumoniae and S. pseudopneumoniae (43), but the study was performed with a smaller number of pseudopneumococcal strains solely from North America. Here we propose that pherotyping may be a promising diagnostic alternative based on the clustering of pseudopneumococcal pherotypes from different continents.

In conclusion, we propose that CSP sequence analysis can provide rapid accurate differentiation of S. pseudopneumoniae from closely related species S. pneumoniae, S. mitis, and S. oralis. With this in mind, we anticipate that some strains currently classified as atypical pneumococci can be identified as pseudopneumococci based on ComC sequencing. Use of ComC sequencing will simplify the gathering of data to understand the disease potential of this organism, which may be now emerging as a pathogen. To add to this observation, we would encourage other laboratories to sequence “atypical pneumococcal” strains to provide more sequences to confirm whether ComC may be used as a rapid marker for the identification of this emerging pathogen.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Royal Free Microbiology Reference Laboratory staff for processing samples.

We thank the Royal Free Hospital Special Trustees for funding this project.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 29 February 2012

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Abdeldaim GM, Stralin K, Olcen P, Blomberg J, Herrmann B. 2008. Toward a quantitative DNA-based definition of pneumococcal pneumonia: a comparison of Streptococcus pneumoniae target genes, with special reference to the Spn9802 fragment. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 60:143–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Arbique JC, et al. 2004. Accuracy of phenotypic and genotypic testing for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and description of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4686–4696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Balsalobre L, et al. 2006. Molecular characterization of disease-associated streptococci of the mitis group that are optochin susceptible. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4163–4171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Borek AP, Dressel DC, Hussong J, Peterson LR. 1997. Evolving clinical problems with Streptococcus pneumoniae: increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents, and failure of traditional optochin identification in Chicago, Illinois, between 1993 and 1996. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29:209–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Carvalho Mda G, et al. 2007. Evaluation and improvement of real-time PCR assays targeting lytA, ply, and psaA genes for detection of pneumococcal DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2460–2466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dauga C. 2002. Evolution of the gyrB gene and the molecular phylogeny of Enterobacteriaceae: a model molecule for molecular systematic studies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:531–547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. El Aila NA, et al. 2010. The development of a 16S rRNA gene based PCR for the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and comparison with four other species specific PCR assays. BMC Infect. Dis. 10:104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Enright MC, Spratt BG. 1998. A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae: identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology 144(Pt. 11):3049–3060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fenoll A, Martinez-Suarez JV, Munoz R, Casal J, Garcia JL. 1990. Identification of atypical strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae by a specific DNA probe. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 9:396–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fenoll A, Munoz R, Garcia E, de la Campa AG. 1994. Molecular basis of the optochin-sensitive phenotype of pneumococcus: characterization of the genes encoding the F0 complex of the Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus oralis H(+)-ATPases. Mol. Microbiol. 12:587–598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hanage WP, et al. 2005. Using multilocus sequence data to define the pneumococcus. J. Bacteriol. 187:6223–6230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Harf-Monteil C, Granello C, Le Brun C, Monteil H, Riegel P. 2006. Incidence and pathogenic effect of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2240–2241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Havarstein LS, Coomaraswamy G, Morrison DA. 1995. An unmodified heptadecapeptide pheromone induces competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:11140–11144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Havarstein LS, Gaustad P, Nes IF, Morrison DA. 1996. Identification of the streptococcal competence-pheromone receptor. Mol. Microbiol. 21:863–869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Havarstein LS, Hakenbeck R, Gaustad P. 1997. Natural competence in the genus Streptococcus: evidence that streptococci can change pherotype by interspecies recombinational exchanges. J. Bacteriol. 179:6589–6594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hoshino T, Fujiwara T, Kilian M. 2005. Use of phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses to identify nonhemolytic streptococci isolated from bacteremic patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:6073–6085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ing J, et al. 11 January 2012. Characterization of non-typeable and atypical Streptococcus pneumoniae pediatric isolates from 1994–2010. J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.05182-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Johnston C, et al. 2010. Detection of large numbers of pneumococcal virulence genes in streptococci of the mitis group. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:2762–2769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kacou-N′douba A, et al. 2010. Emergence of optochin resistance among S. pneumoniae strains colonizing healthy children in Abidjan. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 28:80–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kaijalainen T, Rintamaki S, Herva E, Leinonen M. 2002. Evaluation of gene-technological and conventional methods in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Microbiol. Methods 51:111–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kawamura Y, Hou XG, Sultana F, Miura H, Ezaki T. 1995. Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:406–408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kearns AM, et al. 2000. Pneumolysin detection identifies atypical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1309–1310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Keith ER, Murdoch DR. 2008. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae isolated from sputum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Keith ER, Podmore RG, Anderson TP, Murdoch DR. 2006. Characteristics of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae isolated from purulent sputum samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:923–927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kilian M, et al. 2008. Evolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae and its close commensal relatives. PLoS One 3:e2683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Knoll B, Tleyjeh IM, Steckelberg JM, Wilson WR, Baddour LM. 2007. Infective endocarditis due to penicillin-resistant viridans group streptococci. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:1585–1592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kontiainen S, Sivonen A. 1987. Optochin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated from blood and middle ear fluid. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6:422–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Leegaard TM, et al. 2010. Phenotypic and genomic characterization of pneumococcus-like streptococci isolated from HIV-seropositive patients. Microbiology 156:838–848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lejbkowicz F, Goldstein M, Hashman N, Cohn L. 1999. Optochin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from a blood specimen. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 21:72–73 [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Leung MH, Oriyo NM, Gillespie SH, Charalambous BM. 2011. The adaptive potential during nasopharyngeal colonisation of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11:1989–1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Marron A, et al. 2000. Serious complications of bacteremia caused by viridans streptococci in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31:1126–1130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Martin-Galiano AJ, Balsalobre L, Fenoll A, de la Campa AG. 2003. Genetic characterization of optochin-susceptible viridans group streptococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3187–3194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Muller-Graf CD, et al. 1999. Population biology of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from oropharyngeal carriage and invasive disease. Microbiology 145(Pt. 11):3283–3293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Munoz R, Fenoll A, Vicioso D, Casal J. 1990. Optochin-resistant variants of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:63–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Neeleman C, Klaassen CH, Klomberg DM, de Valk HA, Mouton JW. 2004. Pneumolysin is a key factor in misidentification of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and is a putative virulence factor of S. mitis and other streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4355–4357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nolan T, Hands RE, Ogunkolade W, Bustin SA. 2006. SPUD: a quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. Anal. Biochem. 351:308–310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Park HK, et al. 2010. Identification of the cpsA gene as a specific marker for the discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from viridans group streptococci. J. Med. Microbiol. 59:1146–1152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Phillips G, Barker R, Brogan O. 1988. Optochin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Lancet ii:281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pikis A, Campos JM, Rodriguez WJ, Keith JM. 2001. Optochin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: mechanism, significance, and clinical implications. J. Infect. Dis. 184:582–590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Shahinas D, et al. 2011. Whole-genome sequence of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae isolate IS7493. J. Bacteriol. 193:6102–6103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Simoes AS, et al. 2010. Highly penicillin-resistant multidrug-resistant pneumococcus-like strains colonizing children in Oeiras, Portugal: genomic characteristics and implications for surveillance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:238–246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Simoes AS, Valente C, de Lencastre H, Sa-Leao R. 2011. Rapid identification of noncapsulated Streptococcus pneumoniae in nasopharyngeal samples allowing detection of co-colonization and reevaluation of prevalence. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 71:208–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sistek V, et al. 25 October 2011. Development of a real-time PCR assay for the specific detection and identification of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae using the recA gene. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03684.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Suzuki N, et al. 2005. Discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from viridans group streptococci by genomic subtractive hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4528–4534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Tamura K, et al. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731–2739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Vestrheim DF, Gaustad P, Aaberge IS, Caugant DA. 2011. Pherotypes of pneumococcal strains co-existing in healthy children. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11:1703–1708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506–513 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Whatmore AM, Barcus VA, Dowson CG. 1999. Genetic diversity of the streptococcal competence (com) gene locus. J. Bacteriol. 181:3144–3154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Whatmore AM, et al. 2000. Genetic relationships between clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus oralis, and Streptococcus mitis: characterization of “atypical” pneumococci and organisms allied to S. mitis harboring S. pneumoniae virulence factor-encoding genes. Infect. Immun. 68:1374–1382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES