Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):1079–1093. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.3.1079

Helix stability and the mechanism of cruciform extrusion in supercoiled DNA molecules.

K M Sullivan 1, D M Lilley 1
PMCID: PMC334738  PMID: 3344201

Abstract

The kinetic properties of cruciform extrusion in supercoiled DNA molecules fall into two main classes. C-type cruciforms extrude in the absence of added salt, at relatively low temperatures, with large activation energies, while S-type cruciforms exhibit no extrusion in the absence of salt, and maximal rates at 50 mM NaCl, with activation energies about one quarter those of the C-type. These diverse properties are believed to reflect two distinct pathways for the extrusion process, and are determined by the nature of the sequences which form the context of the inverted repeat. C-type kinetics are conferred by A + T rich sequences, implying a role of helix stability in the selection. In this study we have shown that: 1. Helix-destabilising solvents (dimethyl formamide and formamide) facilitate extrusion by normally S-type molecules at low temperatures in the absence of salt. 2. C-type extrusion is strongly suppressed by low concentrations (2-4 microM) distamycin, at which concentrations S-type extrusion is enhanced. 3. Some extrusion occurs in a C-type construct in the presence of 50 mM NaCl. This is increased by addition of 3 microM distamycin, under which conditions extrusion becomes effectively S-type. Thus S-type constructs can behave in a quasi-C-type manner in the presence of helix-destabilising solvents, and C-type extrusion is suppressed by binding a compound which stabilises A + T rich regions of DNA. Helix destabilisation leads to C-type behaviour, while helix stabilisation results in S-type properties. These studies demonstrate the influence of contextual helix stability on the selection of kinetic mechanism of cruciform extrusion.

Full text

PDF
1079

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breslauer K. J., Frank R., Blöcker H., Marky L. A. Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3746–3750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burd J. F., Wartell R. M., Dodgson J. B., Wells R. D. Transmission of stability (telestability) in deoxyribonucleic acid. Physical and enzymatic studies on the duplex block polymer d(C15A15) - d(T15G15). J Biol Chem. 1975 Jul 10;250(13):5109–5113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Courey A. J., Wang J. C. Cruciform formation in a negatively supercoiled DNA may be kinetically forbidden under physiological conditions. Cell. 1983 Jul;33(3):817–829. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gellert M., Mizuuchi K., O'Dea M. H., Ohmori H., Tomizawa J. DNA gyrase and DNA supercoiling. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 1):35–40. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gellert M., O'Dea M. H., Mizuuchi K. Slow cruciform transitions in palindromic DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5545–5549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klevit R. E., Wemmer D. E., Reid B. R. 1H NMR studies on the interaction between distamycin A and a symmetrical DNA dodecamer. Biochemistry. 1986 Jun 3;25(11):3296–3303. doi: 10.1021/bi00359a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kopka M. L., Yoon C., Goodsell D., Pjura P., Dickerson R. E. Binding of an antitumor drug to DNA, Netropsin and C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-BrC-G-C-G. J Mol Biol. 1985 Jun 25;183(4):553–563. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lilley D. M. Hairpin-loop formation by inverted repeats in supercoiled DNA is a local and transmissible property. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Mar 25;9(6):1271–1289. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.6.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lilley D. M. The inverted repeat as a recognizable structural feature in supercoiled DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6468–6472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lilley D. M. The kinetic properties of cruciform extrusion are determined by DNA base-sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Mar 11;13(5):1443–1465. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.5.1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MARMUR J., DOTY P. Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J Mol Biol. 1962 Jul;5:109–118. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McConaughy B. L., Laird C. D., McCarthy B. J. Nucleic acid reassociation in formamide. Biochemistry. 1969 Aug;8(8):3289–3295. doi: 10.1021/bi00836a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mizuuchi K., Mizuuchi M., Gellert M. Cruciform structures in palindromic DNA are favored by DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):229–243. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90325-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Panayotatos N., Wells R. D. Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA. Nature. 1981 Feb 5;289(5797):466–470. doi: 10.1038/289466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Panyutin I., Klishko V., Lyamichev V. Kinetics of cruciform formation and stability of cruciform structure in superhelical DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1984 Jun;1(6):1311–1324. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1984.10507522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reinert K. E., Stutter E., Schweiss H. Aspects of specific protein-DNA interaction; multi-mode binding of the oligopeptide antibiotic netropsin to (A.T)-rich DNA segments. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Nov 10;7(5):1375–1392. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.5.1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schildkraut C. Dependence of the melting temperature of DNA on salt concentration. Biopolymers. 1965;3(2):195–208. doi: 10.1002/bip.360030207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sinden R. R., Pettijohn D. E. Cruciform transitions in DNA. J Biol Chem. 1984 May 25;259(10):6593–6600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sullivan K. M., Lilley D. M. A dominant influence of flanking sequences on a local structural transition in DNA. Cell. 1986 Dec 5;47(5):817–827. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90524-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sullivan K. M., Lilley D. M. Influence of cation size and charge on the extrusion of a salt-dependent cruciform. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jan 20;193(2):397–404. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90227-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vologodskii A. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Theoretical melting profiles and denaturation maps of DNA with known sequence: fdDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Jul;5(7):2547–2556. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.7.2547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang A. H., Quigley G. J., Kolpak F. J., Crawford J. L., van Boom J. H., van der Marel G., Rich A. Molecular structure of a left-handed double helical DNA fragment at atomic resolution. Nature. 1979 Dec 13;282(5740):680–686. doi: 10.1038/282680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wells R. D., Larson J. E., Grant R. C., Shortle B. E., Cantor C. R. Physicochemical studies on polydeoxyribonucleotides containing defined repeating nucleotide sequences. J Mol Biol. 1970 Dec 28;54(3):465–497. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90121-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zimmer C., Reinert K. E., Luck G., Wähnert U., Löber G., Thrum H. Interaction of the oligopeptide antibiotics netropsin and distamycin A with nucleic acids. J Mol Biol. 1971 May 28;58(1):329–348. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90250-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES