Skip to main content
Journal of Translational Medicine logoLink to Journal of Translational Medicine
. 2012 Mar 7;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-41

Gene expression profiling of HCV genotype 3a initial liver fibrosis and cirrhosis patients using microarray

Waqar Ahmad 1,#, Bushra Ijaz 1,#, Sajida Hassan 1,2,
PMCID: PMC3348056  PMID: 22397681

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes liver fibrosis that may lead to liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and may partially depend on infecting viral genotype. HCV genotype 3a is being more common in Asian population, especially Pakistan; the detail mechanism of infection still needs to be explored. In this study, we investigated and compared the gene expression profile between initial fibrosis stage and cirrhotic 3a genotype patients.

Methods

Gene expression profiling of human liver tissues was performed containing more than 22000 known genes. Using Oparray protocol, preparation and hybridization of slides was carried out and followed by scanning with GeneTAC integrator 4.0 software. Normalization of the data was obtained using MIDAS software and Significant Microarray Analysis (SAM) was performed to obtain differentially expressed candidate genes.

Results

Out of 22000 genes studied, 219 differentially regulated genes found with P ≤ 0.05 between both groups; 107 among those were up-regulated and 112 were down-regulated. These genes were classified into 31 categories according to their biological functions. The main categories included: apoptosis, immune response, cell signaling, kinase activity, lipid metabolism, protein metabolism, protein modulation, metabolism, vision, cell structure, cytoskeleton, nervous system, protein metabolism, protein modulation, signal transduction, transcriptional regulation and transport activity.

Conclusion

This is the first study on gene expression profiling in patients associated with genotype 3a using microarray analysis. These findings represent a broad portrait of genomic changes in early HCV associated fibrosis and cirrhosis. We hope that identified genes in this study will help in future to act as prognostic and diagnostic markers to differentiate fibrotic patients from cirrhotic ones.

Background

Chronic hepatitis C is a major liver related health problem destroying liver architecture leading to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Almost 3% of the world population is infected with this deadly virus and in future, it is predicted that infection will rise to 3 fold of the present number [1-6]. HCV persist(s) beside the specific humoral responses and the mechanism of viral persistence and viral clearance is not fully understood. During HCV infection, initial fibrosis development is the method to overcome the damage caused by the virus. But the early events are the basis of disease outcome. Initial fibrosis is thought to be reversible, although many studies do not support this phenomenon. As extracellular matrix (ECM) tissues not only involve matrix production but also matrix degradation leading to ECM remodeling [7-9] Fibrosis is caused by excessive deposition of ECM by histological and molecular reshuffling of various components like collagens, glycoproteins, proteoglycans, matrix proteins and matrix bound growth factors. Fibrosis stage information not only indicates treatment response but also reflect/indicate cirrhosis development disaster [4,10-16]. ECM metabolism is a balance between ECM deposition and removal influenced by cytokines and growth factors [17]. Genome-wide analysis of abnormal gene expression showed transcripts deregulation differences among normal, mild and severe fibrosis during HCC development with identification of novel serum markers for its early stage. Recent studies suggest that genetic markers may be able to define exact stage of liver fibrosis. For this purpose, limited but functional studies have proposed quite a few genetic markers with individual genes or group of genes [18,19]. Advantage of genetic markers over liver biopsy is intrinsic and long-term while, liver biopsy represents only one time point [20]. Researchers found specific genes such as AZIN1, TLR4, CXCL9, CXCL10, CTGF, ITIH1, SERPINF2, TTR, PDGF, TGF-β1, collagens COL1-A1, TNFα, interleukin, ADAMTS, MMPs, TIMPs, LAMB1, LAMC1, Cadherin, CD44, ICAM1, ITGA, APO and CYP2C8 that showed deregulation during liver fibrosis and may be used to access liver fibrosis and cirrhosis [11-28]. Microarray is a powerful technique used for the identification of differentially expressed genes within control and experimental samples in different diseases and conditions like cancer development. Very few studies are available that use microarray for the identification of specific genes related to fibrosis [27,28]. In a recent study, Caillot et al. used microarray technique and found a significant association of ITIH1, SERPINF2 and TTR gene expression and their related proteins with all fibrosis stages [28]. Expression of these genes and related proteins gradually decreased during the fibrosis development to its end stage cirrhosis. Mostly, HCV expression based studies using microarray are carried out with genotype 1 and 2. Very few studies exploring the role of HCV genotype 3a are done with limited set of genes using real Time PCR. Those do not represent complete picture of HCV and human gene interaction leading to disease progression [21-28]. In Pakistan, genotype 3a is the major contributor and has strong association with HCC. The aim of the present study was to examine gene expression profiles in the HCV associated liver disease progression. We have identified for the first time, those genes that are differentially regulated in initial fibrosis and advance stage liver cirrhosis 3a patients and identified potential targets that can be used as effective markers to differentiate between fibrotic and cirrhotic liver with genotype 3a. This data may also help to understand the disease stages between initial versus end stage cirrhosis, as there are limited studies concerning HCV genotype 3a disease progression.

Materials and methods

Patients

This study was conducted at Department of Pathology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Mayo Hospital, Lahore and Liver Centre Faisalabad with collaboration of Applied and Functional Genomics Lab, National Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. HCV RNA-positive patients were identified among HCV antibody (anti-HCV) positive patients. Patients who had received a previous course of INF or immunosuppressive therapy, or who had clinical evidence of HBV or HIV and any other type of liver cancer were excluded from the study. Patients who refused to have a liver biopsy or for whom it was contraindicated, i.e., because of a low platelet count, prolonged prothrombin time or decompensated cirrhosis were also excluded from the study. The liver biopsy procedure, its advantages and possible adverse effects were explained to the patients. Written informed consent for biopsy procedure was obtained from patients, also contained information about demographic data, possible transmission route of HCV infection, clinical, virological and biochemical data. The study was approved by institutional ethical committee.

Patients and liver biopsy

A group of patient was selected from previously described study with known fibrosis evaluation [29]. Two groups of samples consisted of early fibrosis (F1) and cirrhosis (F4) containing 9 samples each were made. Patient's characteristics are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical Characteristics of the patients used in this study

Factor Fibrotic patients Cirrhotic patients P value
Age 37.9 ± 9.5 48.4 ± 7.1 < 0.05
Sex (M/F) 5/4 6/3 0.247
HAI score 6.05 ± 2.8 7.6 ± 2.9 < 0.05
Viral load 1.3 ± × 107 ± 1.5 × 107 2.9 × 105 ± 2.9 × 105 < 0.05
Hb level 12.6 ± 1.2 12.3 ± 1.2 0.328
Bilirubin 0.88 ± 0.2 1.62 ± 0.31 < 0.05
ALT 117.8 ± 55.3 147.5 ± 61.2 0.091
ALP 88.1 ± 47.5 323.8 ± 80.1 < 0.05
AST 107.1 ± 66.5 155.5 ± 90.6 < 0.05
Albumin 4.3 ± 0.16 3.6 ± 0.33 < 0.05
Platelet count 185.1 ± 21.2 81.6 ± 17.7 < 0.05

RNA isolation, cDNA and aRNA preparation, and dye labeling for microarray experiments

RNA from liver biopsy samples were isolated using RNeasy mini elute kit (Qiagen, USA) and preparation of cDNA and aRNA was carried out using RNA ampulse amplification and labeling kit (Kreatech, USA), according to manufacturer. aRNA from HCV infected patients and normal subjects were labeled with Cy3 and Cy5, respectively. A detailed protocol describing each step from start to microarray hybridization can be downloaded from (http://www.operon.com/products/microarrays/OpArray%20Protocol.pdf).

Array hybridization and scanning

Biopsy samples were analyzed on cDNA microarrays (Oparray) containing > 22000 named genes with 37584 spots. Equal amount of Cy3 and Cy5 (55 pmol each) labeled targets were mixed with 45 μl of OpArray Hyb Buffer. Pre-washing, array hybridization and post-washing of microarray labeled slides were performed according to the manufacturer protocols at 42°C for 18 hours on fully automated workstation "GeneTAC ™ HybStation".

Microarray data analysis

GeneTAC ™ UC4 × 4 scanner was used for scanning slides at 10 μm resolution for both Cy3 and Cy5 channels. GeneTAC Integrator 4.0 software was initially used for main data output as "csv" format file containing all necessary information. This "csv" file was converted to "mev" format for normalization by using software "ExpressConverter" (http://www.tm4.org/utilities.html). MIDAS (Microarray Data Analysis System) software was downloaded (http://www.tm4.org/midas.html) and used for normalization of data. Fold induction was determined by using formula log2Cy5/Cy3. A rank-based permutation method SAM was used to identify significantly expressed genes among fibrosis stages (http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/SAM/). Gene expression patterns through k-means clustering were produced and viewed using freely available programs CLUSTER 3.0 (http://rana.lbl.gov/EisenSoftware.htm) and Tree View 1.45 (http://rana.lbl.gov/downloads/TreeView/), respectively. To identify biological themes among gene expression profiles, the Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE) was used (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/content.jsp?file=/ease/ease1.htm&type=1) [30]. The microarray data have been deposited to the GEO accession database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) with accession number GSE33258.

Real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis

Genes with known function and significantly up-regulated or down-regulated were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR with RNA used for microarray analysis. Total RNA was converted to cDNA using MmLV (Moloney murine leukemia virus). Selected and tested oligonucleotide primer pairs for their specificity were used for real time RT-PCR using ABI 7500 real time PCR system using syber green chemistry. Each experiment was run in triplicate including GAPDH as endogenous control (Table 2). Each gene was quantified relative to the calibrator. Applied Biosystem Sequence Detection Software and calculations were made by instrument using the equation 2-ΔΔCT.

Table 2.

Primer sequences used for Real time RT-PCR analysis

Gene name Primer sequence Annealing temp
OAS s:5'-ACTTTAAAAACCCCATTATTGAAA-3' 58°C
as:5'-GGAGAGGGGCAGGGATGAAT-3'
FAM14B s:5'-TCTCACCTCATCAGCAGTGACCAG-3' 60°C
as:5'-CCTCTGGAGATGCAGAATTTGG-3'
CASPASE9 s:5'-ATGTCGTCCAGGGTCTCAAC-3' 58°C
as:5'-GGAAACTGTGAACGGCTCAT-3'
TGFBR s:5'-TTCCGTGGGATACTGAGACA-3' 58°C
as:5'-AGATTTCGTTGTGGGTTTCC-3'

Results

Patient's characteristics

Among 18 patients, equal number of patients belonged to F1 (9) and cirrhotic (9) group. Out of these, six best samples each with good RNA were used for microarray experiments. Normal liver biopsies were also obtained in triplicate. The serum viral load, bilirubin, albumin, and platelet count of cirrhotic patients were significantly low (P < 0.05), while, serum ALP and AST levels were high when compared to patients with F1 stage. There were no significant differences between serum ALT and Hb level in the patients with F1 or cirrhotic stage (Table 1).

Microarray analysis: expression behavior of significant genes

We found 219 differentially regulated genes in fibrosis versus cirrhotic groups (Figure 1). Among these, 107 genes were up-regulated (Figure 2) whereas, 112 genes were down-regulated (Figure 3). Significant genes with their symbols and functions are listed in Tables 3 and 4. Genes were classified into 31 categories according to their biological functions (Figure 4).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Significant host genes regulated by HCV infection. Clustering results for differentially expressed genes between HCV infected patients with initial fibrosis and cirrhosis. Clustering was performed by Cluster 3.0 software. The fold changes in mRNA expression are represented with green and red squares showing down- and up-regulation of genes in liver biopsy samples, respectively. Each vertical column represents an independent experiment, while color scale represents the fold change magnitude.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Heat map of up-regulated genes. Clustering results for differentially expressed genes between HCV infected patients with initial fibrosis and cirrhosis. Clustering was performed by Cluster 3.0 software. The fold changes in mRNA expression are represented with green and red squares showing down- and up-regulation of genes in liver biopsy samples, respectively. Each vertical column represents an independent experiment, while color scale represents the fold change magnitude.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Heat map of down-regulated genes in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic sample. Clustering results for differentially expressed genes between HCV infected patients with initial fibrosis and cirrhosis. Clustering was performed by Cluster 3.0 software. The fold changes in mRNA expression are represented with green and red squares showing down- and up-regulation of genes in liver biopsy samples, respectively. Each vertical column represents an independent experiment, while color scale represents the fold change magnitude.

Table 3.

Up-regulated genes in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic HCV liver biopsy samples

Function Symbol Description GeneBank t- test
Apoptosis CASP9 Caspase-9 precursor (EC 3.4.22) NM_001229.2 0.000207
apoptosis EMP1 Epithelial membrane protein 1 NM_001423.1 1.38E-06
cell adhesion YIF1A Protein YIF1A NM_020470.1 0.000115
Cell Cycle CHES1 Checkpoint suppressor 1 NM_005197.2 0.047852
Cell Cycle CCNG1 Cyclin-G1 NM_004060.3 0.002296
Cell singling LRRC41 Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 41 NM_006369.4 0.000132
cell singling SCG3 Secretogranin-3 precursor NM_013243.2 4.69E-05
Cell singling FLRT1 Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein FLRT1 precursor NM_013280.4 0.022495
cell singling SIGLEC8 Sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 8 precursor NM_014442.2 0.020819
cell structure HYLS1 hydrolethalus syndrome 1 NM_145014.1 7.28E-05
cell structure TOR1AIP1 Torsin-1A-interacting protein 1 NM_015602.2 5.13E-05
cytokine CRLF3 cytokine receptor-like factor 3 XM_001128008.1 3.25E-06
cytokine PLEKHG6 pleckstrin homology domain containing, family G NM_018173.1 0.004661
Cytoskeleton KRTAP19-5 Keratin-associated protein 19-5 NM_181611.1 0.000296
cytoskeleton COMMD5 COMM domain-containing protein 5 NM_014066.2 8.2E-07
DNA replication CENPJ Centromere protein J NM_018451.2 2.22E-05
DNA replication TOP3B DNA topoisomerase 3-beta-1 XM_001129880.1 1.79E-05
DNA replication DDX54 ATP-dependent RNA helicase NM_024072.3 0.080445
Energy Q5VTU8 ATP synthase, NR_002162.1 9.93E-05
Energy COX6A1 Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide VIa-liver NM_004373.2 0.077561
Immune response CRYBB3 Beta crystallin B3 NM_004076.3 2.89E-05
Immune response FCRL3 Fc receptor-like 3 precursor NM_052939.3 9.14E-06
Immune response IFITM2 interferon induced transmembrane protein 2 NM_006435.1 0.000197
Immune response DEFB114 Beta-defensin 114 precursor NM_001037499.1 0.003039
Immune response IFNA21 Interferon alpha-21 precursor NM_002175.1 0.019498
Immune response KIR2DL1 Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 3DL2 precursor NM_153443.2 0.014098
Ion transport CANX Calnexin precursor NM_001024649.1 0.097857
Ion transport CLGN Calmegin precursor NM_004362.1 0.002724
ion transport HHLA3 HERV-H LTR-associating 3 isoform 2 NM_001036645.1 0.003147
kinase activity PDXK Pyridoxal kinase NM_003681.3 0.037672
kinase activity PRKCB1 Protein kinase C beta type NM_002738.5 0.009381
Lipid Metabolism PPAPDC3 Probable lipid phosphate phosphatase PPAPDC3 NM_032728.2 6.06E-05
Lipid Metabolism OSBPL2 Oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 2 NM_144498.1 0.016902
lipid metabolism Q5R387 Novel protein XM_372769.4 0.000376
liver functions LEPROT Leptin receptor precursor NM_017526.2 0.107525
Metabolism EMR1 EGF-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1 precursor NM_001974.3 0.00022
Metabolism UROD Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase NM_000374.3 0.004853
metabolism DCN Decorin precursor NM_001920.3 0.000807
Metabolism FAHD2B fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase domain containing 2B XR_016023.1 4.16E-06
Metabolism ACSBG2 Prostatic acid phosphatase precursor NM_001099.2 1.55E-05
Metabolism ANTXR2 Anthrax toxin receptor 2 precursor NM_058172.3 1.92E-05
Metabolism CDA Cytidine deaminase NM_001785.2 0.005579
Metabolism CTSD Cathepsin D precursor NM_001909.3 0.028633
Metabolism GOT2 Aspartate aminotransferase, mitochondrial precursor XR_016602.1 0.000258
Metabolism NAT13 Mak3 homolog XR_018106.1 5.03E-06
Metabolism TIGD5 Tigger transposable element-derived protein 5 NM_032862.2 0.057722
nervous system NPAS3 Neuronal PAS domain-containing protein 3 NM_022123.1 0.000115
nervous system GPR98 G-protein coupled receptor 98 precursor NM_032119.3 0.000239
nervous system NEUROD2 Neurogenic differentiation factor 2 NM_006160.3 2.17E-05
nervous system LAMB2 Laminin subunit beta-2 precursor NM_002292.3 0.007081
protein Metabolism CSDE1 GTPase NRas precursor NM_002524.2 0.017096
protein Metabolism ENPP7 Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase NM_178543.3 0.000321
protein Metabolism KIAA1147 KIAA1147 (KIAA1147), mRNA NM_001080392.1 0.000106
protein Metabolism KIAA2013 KIAA2013 (KIAA2013), mRNA NM_138346.1 2.86E-05
protein Metabolism KNG1 Kininogen-1 precursor NM_000893.2 0.002086
protein Metabolism APOOL Protein FAM121A precursor NM_198450.3 0.019311
Protein modulation HAT1 Histone acetyltransferase type B catalytic subunit NM_001033085.1 0.000447
Protein modulation RIMS2 Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis protein 2 NM_014677.2 0.000572
Protein modulation UBL4B Ubiquitin-like protein 4B NM_203412.1 2.33E-05
Protein modulation UBE1L Ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 homolog NM_003335.2 0.021531
Protein modulation USP54 ubiquitin specific protease 54 NM_152586.2 0.005541
Protein synthesis RNPEP Aminopeptidase B NM_020216.3 0.0218
PTMs SNF1LK2 Serine/threonine-protein kinase SNF1-like kinase 2 NM_015191.1 0.00037
RNA modelling and synthesis IMP3 U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein protein IMP3 NM_018285.2 7.13E-05
RNA modelling and synthesis SF3A2 Splicing factor 3A subunit 2 NM_007165.4 0.123287
Signal Transduction CACNB3 Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-3 NM_000725.2 0.00248
Signal Transduction PCSK5 Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 5 precursor NM_006200.2 6.62E-06
Signal Transduction VDAC3 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3 XR_019103.1 0.000231
Signal Transduction ITGB6 Integrin beta-6 precursor NM_000888.3 0.008005
sulphur metabolism FAM119B family with sequence similarity 119 NM_015433.2 0.018357
Transcriptional regulation LYSMD3 LysM and putative peptidoglycan-binding domain-containing protein 3 NM_198273.1 0.004237
transcriptional regulation FOXI1 Forkhead box protein I1 NM_012188.3 1.84E-05
transcriptional regulation MYCL1 L-myc-1 proto-oncogene protein NM_001033081.1 4.97E-05
transcriptional regulation MYOD1 Myoblast determination protein 1 NM_002478.4 7.25E-06
transcriptional regulation PRDM5 PR domain zinc finger protein 5 NM_018699.2 1.03E-07
Transcriptional regulation YBX1 Nuclease sensitive element-binding protein 1 XM_001129294.1 6.12E-05
Transcriptional regulation ANKHD1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 3 NM_020690.4 0.041134
transcriptional regulation RUNX2 Runt-related transcription factor 2 NM_001024630.2 0.064668
Transcriptional regulation SUSD4 Sushi domain-containing protein 4 precursor NM_017982.2 0.004775
Transport CLPB Caseinolytic peptidase B protein homolog NM_030813.3 0.027308
Transport K1024 UPF0258 protein KIAA1024 NM_015206.1 0.001564
transport NOS2A nitric oxide synthase 2, inducible1 NM_000625 0.017057
transport SCGN Secretagogin NM_006998.3 2E-06
Transport FBXO32 F-box only protein 32 NM_148177.1 0.043284
Uncharacterized C12orf41 CDNA FLJ12670 NM_017822.2 0.001604
Uncharacterized C17orf56 CDNA FLJ31528 NM_144679.1 1.11E-06
Uncharacterized C21orf59 Uncharacterized protein NM_021254.1 0.001335
Uncharacterized C4orf20 CDNA FLJ11200 NM_018359.1 0.000365
Uncharacterized C9orf7 Uncharacterized protein NM_017586.1 0.002015
Uncharacterized C9orf91 C9orf91 protein NM_153045.2 2.21E-06
Uncharacterized KIAA0562 glycine-, glutamate-, thienylcyclohexylpiperidine-binding protein NM_014704.2 5.09E-05
Uncharacterized KLHL30 kelch-like 30 NM_198582.1 5.06E-06
Uncharacterized LOC728660 - XM_001128340.1 0.000153
Uncharacterized Q71MF4 - - 7.89E-05
Uncharacterized Q8TCQ8 CDNA FLJ90801 fis, clone Y79AA1000207 XM_001134000.1 0.028312
Uncharacterized Q8WY63 PP565 - 0.017959
Uncharacterized ST8SIA6 Alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 8F NM_001004470.1 0.008458
Uncharacterized C10orf6 Uncharacterized protein C10orf6 NM_018121.2 0.000673
Uncharacterized O75264 - XM_209196.5 0.01282
Uncharacterized Q9NW32 CDNA FLJ10346 - 0.038301
Uncharacterized S11Y Putative S100 calcium-binding protein XM_001126350.1 0.002549
Vision ST13 Hsc70-interacting protein XR_018201.1 0.012047
Vision DUPD1 dual specificity phosphatase and pro isomerase domain containing 1 NM_001003892.1 4.5E-06
Vision OR6P1 Olfactory receptor 6P1 - 1.78E-05
Vision ARSH arylsulfatase H NM_001011719.1 0.002229
Vision OR51F2 Olfactory receptor 51F2 NM_001004753.1 0.018938
Vision OR7G3 Olfactory receptor 7G3 NM_001001958.1 0.077667

Table 4.

Down-regulated genes in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic HCV liver biopsy samples

Function Symbol Description GeneBank t- test
Apoptosis BCL2L12 Bcl-2-related proline-rich protein NM_001040668.1 0.000335
Apoptosis PDCD1 Programmed cell death protein 1 precursor NM_005018.1 7.94E-06
carbohydrate metabolism OGDHL oxoglutarate dehydrogenase-like NM_018245.1 0.000909
cell adhesion THUMPD1 THUMP domain-containing protein 1 NM_017736.3 0.044141
Cell Cycle AKAP4 A-kinase anchor protein 11 NM_016248.2 0.000598
cell cycle TINF2 TERF1-interacting nuclear factor 2 NM_012461 0.045359
cell cycle VEGFB vascular endothelial growth factor B NM_003377 0.017886
cell singling GRIN3A Glutamate [NMDA] receptor subunit 3A precursor NM_133445.1 1.17E-06
cell singling Q8N9G6 similar to nuclear pore membrane protein 121 XM_498333.2 7.46E-05
Cell Structure ENO3 Beta-enolase NM_001976.2 0.050309
cell structure MAP6D1 MAP6 domain-containing protein 1 NM_024871.1 0.034981
cytokine IL13RA2 Interleukin-13 receptor alpha-2 chain precursor NM_000640.2 0.024814
Cytoskeleton LLGL1 Lethal(2) giant larvae protein homolog 1 NM_004140.3 0.008177
cytoskeleton SNX17 Sorting nexin-17 NM_014748.2 5.41E-05
DNA binding proteins ZNF236 Zinc finger protein 236 NM_007345.2 1.54E-07
DNA binding proteins ZBED4 Zinc finger BED domain-containing protein 4 NM_014838.1 0.003728
DNA replication WRB Tryptophan-rich protein NM_004627.2 0.000578
Energy ABHD2 ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 2 NM_005692.3 0.000193
Energy ATAD2 ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 2 NM_014109.2 8.59E-06
Energy PSMD11 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11 NM_002815.2 0.000415
Energy PSMD4 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4 NM_002810.2 0.003878
Energy SYDE1 synapse defective 1 NM_033025.4 0.000222
Immune response ATG16L2 ATG16 autophagy related 16-like 2 NM_033388.1 1.31E-05
Immune response IL8RB High affinity interleukin-8 receptor B NM_001557.2 0.00539
immune response PTGS2 prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 NM_000963 0.00504
immune response FAM14B Interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 1 NM_145249 0.006008
immune response OAS2 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthase 2 NM_016817 0.009299
Ion transport DSG4 Desmoglein-4 precursor NM_177986.2 1.23E-05
Ion transport SLC10A5 Sodium/bile acid cotransporter 5 precursor NM_001010893.2 6.5E-08
Ion transport CAPN7 Calpain-7 NM_014296.2 0.003785
ion transport MT1E Metallothionein-1E NM_175617.3 0.001767
Lipid Metabolism DEGS2 sphingolipid C4-hydroxylase/delta 4-desaturase NM_206918.1 0.008105
lipid metabolism CHKA Choline kinase alpha NM_001277.2 0.003609
lipid metabolism ADA bubblegum related protein NM_030924.3 6.6E-05
Metabolism HMGCL Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA lyase, mitochondrial precursor NM_000191.2 0.010122
metabolism HMGCS1 Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase, cytoplasmic NM_002130.4 1.2E-05
Metabolism SH3BGRL3 SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich-like protein 3 NM_031286.3 0.000157
Metabolism ARHGAP5 Rho GTPase-activating protein 5 NM_001173.2 0.010513
Metabolism CKM Creatine kinase M-type NM_001824.2 0.000689
Metabolism CPT1A Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase I, liver isoform NM_001031847.1 0.008256
Metabolism USP53 Inactive ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 53 NM_019050.1 2.46E-06
morphogenesis SLC33A1 Acetyl-coenzyme A transporter 1 NM_004733.2 8.12E-06
morphogenesis PDYN Beta-neoendorphin-dynorphin precursor NM_024411.2 0.055803
nervous system NINJ2 Ninjurin-2 (Nerve injury-induced protein 2) NM_016533.4 0.004163
protein Metabolism GON4L GON-4-like protein NM_001037533.1 0.00137
protein Metabolism PHACTR4 phosphatase and actin regulator 4 isoform 1 NM_001048183.1 0.000139
protein Metabolism OTUD7A OTU domain-containing protein 7A XM_001127986.1 0.00394
protein Metabolism Q96NT9 GR AF-1 specific protein phosphatase XM_497354.1 7.5E-05
protein Metabolism WFDC13 Protein WFDC13 precursor NM_172005.1 0.080737
Protein modulation SMAP1 Stromal membrane-associated protein 1 NM_001044305.1 8.97E-08
Protein modulation DYRK1B Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1B NM_004714.1 0.001009
Protein modulation COQ5 Ubiquinone biosynthesis methyltransferase COQ5 NM_032314.3 2.07E-05
Protein modulation MTIF2 Translation initiation factor IF-2 NM_001005369.1 0.002917
Protein synthesis MRPL46 39S ribosomal protein L46, mitochondrial precursor NM_022163.2 2.83E-06
Protein synthesis MRPS35 28S ribosomal protein S35, mitochondrial precursor NM_021821.2 0.000245
protein synthesis PLAT Tissue-type plasminogen activator precursor NM_000930.2 0.014382
protein synthesis SENP1 Sentrin-specific protease 1 NM_014554.2 1.63E-06
protein synthesis ELL RNA polymerase II elongation factor ELL NM_006532.2 0.003242
Protein synthesis PACS1 Phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 1 NM_018026.2 0.005118
protein synthesis PTP4A1 Protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA protein 1 NM_003463.3 0.001949
PTMs SNF1LK Serine/threonine-protein kinase SNF1-like kinase 1 NM_173354.3 0.000169
Reproduction LOC283116 similar to Tripartite motif protein 49 XR_016154.1 5.32E-07
Reproduction Q5VYG3 OTTHUMP00000018545 - 2.51E-05
RNA modelling and synthesis EXOSC2 Exosome complex exonuclease RRP4 NM_014285.4 0.080373
RNA modelling and synthesis RBM41 RNA-binding protein 41 NM_018301.2 0.002623
RNA modelling and synthesis ADCY2 Double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase NM_001111.3 6.64E-05
Signal Transduction FGF17 Fibroblast growth factor 17 precursor NM_003867.2 0.000254
Signal Transduction ADH1A Adenylate cyclase type 2 NM_020546.2 0.00139
Signal Transduction HOMER1 Homer protein homolog 1 NM_004272.3 0.011954
Signal Transduction TMEM100 Transmembrane protein 100 NM_018286.1 3.31E-05
sulphur metabolism FAM62B family with sequence similarity 62 NM_020728.1 1.6E-05
transcriptional regulation CRAMP1L Protein cramped-like NM_020825.2 0.006587
transcriptional regulation FOXK2 Forkhead box protein K2 XM_001134364.1 0.00156
transcriptional regulation HMGN2 Nonhistone chromosomal protein HMG-17 XM_001133530.1 0.01162
Transcriptional regulation NANOGP8 Homeobox protein NANOGP8 - 0.000264
transcriptional regulation NFXL1 nuclear transcription factor NM_152995.4 8.53E-05
transcriptional regulation NR1I3 Orphan nuclear receptor NR1I3 NM_001077470.1 0.00247
Transcriptional regulation SNORA32 Protein JOSD3 NR_003032.1 0.107321
Transcriptional regulation GTF2B Transcription initiation factor IIB NM_001514.3 0.002357
Transcriptional regulation PAX8 Paired box protein Pax-8 NM_003466.3 4.89E-05
Transcriptional regulation CTCFL Transcriptional repressor CTCFL NM_080618.2 0.003129
Transcriptional regulation EEF1AL3 Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 - 0.000917
Transcriptional regulation INTU PDZ domain-containing protein 6 NM_015693.2 0.003842
transcriptional regulation TGFBR2 TGF-beta receptor type-2 precursor NM_001024847.1 0.007651
Transport KIF1A Kinesin-like protein KIF1A NM_004321.4 0.002119
transport NUP160 Nuclear pore complex protein Nup160 NM_015231.1 3.11E-06
transport SLIT3 Slit homolog 3 protein precursor NM_003062.1 0.000577
Transport AMICA1 Junctional adhesion molecule-like precursor NM_153206.1 3.86E-06
Transport KIF17 Kinesin-like protein KIF17 NM_020816.1 0.007279
Transport SCAMP4 secretory carrier membrane protein 4 NM_079834.2 0.026864
transport MUC6 Mucin-6 precursor (Gastric mucin-6) XM_290540.7 0.054436
Transport SNF8 Vacuolar sorting protein SNF8 XR_019363.1 0.000425
Uncharacterized C14orf101 Uncharacterized protein C14orf101 NM_017799.3 0.02931
Uncharacterized C16orf57 C16orf57 protein NM_024598.2 0.000456
Uncharacterized Q6PDB4 - - 2.68E-05
Uncharacterized Q6ZMS0 CDNA FLJ16729 - 0.027141
Uncharacterized Q6ZRH2 CDNA FLJ46361 - 1.15E-06
Uncharacterized Q8NB05 CDNA FLJ34424 - 0.000459
Uncharacterized SEC14L5 - XM_032693.5 2.77E-06
Uncharacterized CD164L2 CD164 sialomucin-like 2 protein precursor NM_207397.2 0.000576
Uncharacterized CNOT6 CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit NM_015455.3 0.000838
Uncharacterized Q6YL35 - - 0.00218
Uncharacterized Q8N2T9 CDNA: FLJ21438 XM_029084.8 0.007508
Uncharacterized Q96NM1 CDNA FLJ30594 - 0.000447
Uncharacterized C22orf30 Novel protein (DJ694E4.2 protein) NM_173566.1 0.000611
Uncharacterized SBDS Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome NM_016038.2 0.006543
Vision ARSJ arylsulfatase family, member J NM_024590.3 0.000249
vision OR51T1 Olfactory receptor 51T1 NM_001004759.1 0.000408
vision OR6C1 Olfactory receptor 6C1 NM_001005182.1 0.000136
vision DUSP5 Dual specificity protein phosphatase 5 NM_004419.3 0.000125
vision OR5K1 Olfactory receptor 5K1 (HTPCRX10) NM_001004736.2 0.000169
Vision RPGR retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator NM_001023582.1 0.007569

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Distribution of genes according to their functions. Genes were grouped in 31 different categories.

Significantly synchronized genes with known biological functions

The differentially regulated genes were grouped according to their biological functions by EASE program that uses information from Entrez Gene (http://jura.wi.mit.edu/entrez_gene/) and KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kegg1.html). Our results showed variation in gene regulation in both early fibrosis and cirrhosis stages (Figure 1). Out of 107 up-regulated gens, 65 belonged to early fibrosis stage, whereas, 42 genes belonged to the cirrhotic stage. Genes related to immune response, cell signaling, kinase activity, lipid metabolism, metabolism, vision and transcriptional regulation were up-regulated in both early fibrosis and cirrhotic samples (Table 2). We found that most genes related to apoptosis, cell structure, cytoskeleton, nervous system protein metabolism, protein modulation, signal transduction, transcriptional regulation and transport were up-regulated in early fibrosis. Many uncharacterized genes were also found up-regulated in liver disease progression. We identified 112 genes (F1 = 92; F4 = 20) related to above mentioned pathways down-regulated when fibrosis lead to cirrhotic stage (Table 2 and Figure 2). Genes related to these pathways showed varied response and none of biological function was specifically related to any liver disease stage (Table 4 and Figure 3).

Independent validation of candidate genes using quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA extracted from infected liver biopsies was used for real time RT-PCR analysis to validate microarray data. Expression analysis of the genes involved in apoptosis, immune response and transcriptional regulation was performed. We randomly selected four genes, CASPASE9, FAM14B, OAS2 and TGFBR2 from our study. CASPASE9 is apoptosis related gene, FAM14B and OAS2 are immune responsive genes, whereas, TGFBR2 is multifunctional gene and found to be up-regulated in fibrosis.

Discussion

Liver fibrosis can progress to cirrhosis after an interval of 15-20 years in patients with HCV [31]. It is very important to identify such markers that can differentiate liver fibrosis from cirrhosis. Liver biopsy is a common tool for the detection of liver current situation but due to some limitations its use as diagnostic tool is denied. Microarray analysis is an emerging and novel approach to study gene expression in HCV associated fibrosis and cirrhosis. As liver gene expression in HCV patients is variable and it might be partially dependent on the corresponding genotype [32]. In this study, we specially focused on gene expression analysis in patients with genotype 3a that is most common in our region. We found that many genes associated with apoptosis, several cellular functions, immune response, metabolism including energy, liver, sulphur; protein metabolism, transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, transport, DNA replication were dys-regulated both in early fibrosis and cirrhosis. In some cases, gene expression tends to be increased from initial fibrosis to cirrhosis. Induction of gene expression associated with proapoptotic, proinflammatory and proliferative activities is in accordance with previous studies [18,27,33-35]. Although, we found some dysregulation of genes related to vision and nervous system first time.

Differential expression of apoptosis related genes in HCV associated initial fibrosis and cirrhosis

In this study, host genes involved in apoptosis (Figure 5) such as BCL212 and PDCD1 showed down-regulation in initial fibrosis and significant up-regulation in cirrhosis, whereas, expression levels for CASP9 and EMP1 genes were high at initial stage and were down-regulated in cirrhosis stage. Regulation of apoptotic inducer and program cell death genes, BCL212 and PDCD1 in cirrhosis is according to previous observations where pro-apoptotic gene signaling has been observed in infection with HCV [36,37]. CASP9 is known as apoptosis initiator [38] and EMP1 is also found to induce apoptosis [39,40]. Expression of caspases is higher in early and moderate HCV infection, and enhanced apoptosis occur through the intrinsic apoptotic pathway via mitochondria [41,42].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Differential expression of apoptotic genes in HCV associated initial fibrosis and cirrhosis. Clustering results for differentially expressed genes between HCV infected patients with initial fibrosis and cirrhosis according to their functions. Clustering was performed by Cluster 3.0 software. Genes shown in red are up-regulated, while down-regulated genes are shown in green. Genes shown in black have no expression changes. Gene expression profiles were presented on a 2-fold change scale.

Cellular functions, cell cycle, signaling and cytoskeleton associated genes

Genes related to various cellular functions showed different expression patterns (Figure 6). The cytoskeleton (COMMD5, KRTAP19-5, LLGL1 and SNX17) related genes were down-regulated in cirrhosis (F4). Most cell structure related genes were up-regulated in initial fibrosis (HYLS1, MAP6D1 and TOR1AIP1) and genes related to cell adhesion, cell cycle and signaling showed differential expression in both initial fibrosis and cirrhosis. It has been observed that HCV RNA synthesis may require an intact cytoskeleton [43]; our data indicated that many genes related to cytoskeleton were regulated by HCV infection.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Parallel expression of genes associated with Cellular functions, cell cycle, signaling and cytoskeleton in F1 versus F4. Genes shown in red are up-regulated, while down-regulated genes are shown in green. Genes shown in black have no expression changes. Gene expression profiles were presented on a 2-fold change scale.

Genes associated with Immune response and cytokines

A number of genes related to immune response and cytokines were identified (Figure 7). ATG16L2, DEFB114, FAM14B, IFNA21, IL8RB and KIR2DL genes were up-regulated in cirrhosis, whereas, FCRL3, IFITM2 and OAS2 genes were up-regulated in initial fibrosis. Genes related to cytokine regulation, IL13RA2, PLEKHG6 and XCL2 were down-regulated in initial fibrosis except CRLF3 gene. Interleukin related gene expression has been found to be increased at pathology stage 3 and 4 and which is concurrent with the present study and is associated with metastatsis, cell proliferation or angiogenesis [37,44]. An increased expression of immune responsive genes and cytokines as fibrosis progress is in agreement with previous evidence that liver inflammation may enhance with increase in infected hepatocytes [45]. FCRL3, a genetically conserved gene family encodes orphan cell surface receptors bearing high structural homology to classical Fc receptors, with multiple extracellular Ig domains and either ITAMs, ITIMs, or both in the intracellular domains. The natural ligands of these family members are still unknown but due to their signaling domains and expression on multiple immune cell types, these members likely modulate immune cell functions by affecting signaling pathways [46]. FCRL3 is expressed predominantly in B lymphocytes in lymph nodes and germinal centers [47-49].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Expression profiles of immune responsive and cytokines associated genes. Clustering results for differentially expressed genes between HCV infected patients with initial fibrosis and cirrhosis according to their functions. Clustering was performed by Cluster 3.0 software. Gene expression profiles were presented on a 2-fold change scale.

Previous studies revealed that IFITM2 and IFITM3 (two structurally related cell plasma membrane proteins) interrupt early steps entry and/or uncoating of the viral infection. Interferon-induced transmembrane (IFITM) genes are transcribed in most tissues with the exception of IFITM5 interferon inducible gene. IFITM genes are involved in early development, cell adhesion, and control of cell growth. Elevated gene expression triggered by past or chronic inflammation can prevent spreading of pathogens by limiting host cell proliferation. Low level of expression is sufficient to capture the growth of cells, whereas, the loss of expression causes tumor growth. This gene is termed as tumor suppressor. However, in many cancers it is observed that despite high level of IFITM, it represents tumor progression stage especially where the one of anti-proliferative interferon pathway is shut down. The role of ATG protein in membrane trafficking is mostly not clear. ATGL16 is thought to play role in autophagosome formation in association with RAB33B. It is also considered an active player in HCV replication and assembly [50,51].

Natural killer cells are the important player of innate immune response. KIRDL gene expression is found to be high in chronic HCV patients [52]. We found the KIR2DL1 gene expression high in patients with cirrhosis as compared to initial fibrosis stage. OAS synthesized in response to IFN-alpha stimulation. In infected cells, OAS enzymatic activity is induced by double-stranded RNAs, such as the intermediates of replication of RNA viruses or folded single stranded RNAs. OAS catalyzes polymerization of adenosine triphosphate into oligoadenylate that, in turn, activates a cellular endoribonuclease, RNase L, at subnanomolar concentrations. RNase L degrades cellular and viral single-stranded RNAs. Thus, viral replication is inhibited as a result of protein synthesis inhibition in a totally non-virus specific way [53]. We found high expression of OAS2 gene in fibrotic samples as compared to the last stage cirrohsis. This may be a way to stop viral replication but as the disease steps forward, virus overcome the host immune response to replicate itself.

Genes associated with different metabolic processes

A number of genes associated with different metabolism (processes/pathways) like energy, kinases, lipid and sulphur metabolism were identified among significantly expressed arrays (Figure 8). Several studies observed that HCV induces alterations in lipid metabolism that can lead to oxidative stress [54,55]. Consistent with these observations, we found six genes, ADA, CHKA, DEGS2, OSBPL2, PPAPDC3, and Q5R387; which are involved in lipid biosynthesis, tumor cell growth by phosphatidyl-ethanolamine biosynthesis, negative regulation of myoblast differentiation and hydrolyzation of phospholipids into fatty acids etc. This finding is in agreement with Diamond et al.; that host cell lipid metabolism may represent an area for future HCV antiviral therapies [56]. We found two genes FAM119B and FAM62B associated with sulphur metabolism which were up-regulated in cirrhotic samples. A number of genes related to energy mechanism such as PSMD4, PSMD11, ABHD2, ATAD2 and COX6A1 were up-regulated while, SYDE1 and Q5VTUB genes were down-regulated in cirrhotic samples. Two genes PDXK and PRKCB1 with kinase activity, and one gene, OGDHL linked to carbohydrate metabolism were also identified. Role of PRKCB1 (also known as PKC) in cell growth and differentiation control is known. It has been also found elevated in breast and pituitary tumors and malignant gliomas [57-59]. PKC was also found up regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma which can lead to hyper proliferation of the HCV infected tissues [60].

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Genes associated with different metabolic processes. Clustering was performed by Cluster 3.0 software. Genes shown in red are up-regulated, while down-regulated genes are shown in green. Genes shown in black have no expression changes. Gene expression profiles were presented on a 2-fold change scale.

Genes associated with protein synthesis, modulation and metabolism

Many genes involved in protein synthesis, modulation and metabolism have increased or decreased expression in patients with HCV (Figure 9). Genes representing protein synthesis were down-regulated in initial fibrosis and showed significant increased expression in cirrhotic samples. Two genes associated with protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) were also identified that showed increased expression in cirrhosis. Some genes linked with protein metabolism like GON4L, OTUD7A, PHACTR4, Q96NT9 and WFDC13 showed low expression in initial fibrosis, while CSDE1, ENPP7, KIAA1147, KIAA2013 and KNG1 were up-regulated in early fibrosis. It was interesting to know that previous studies have not shown the regulation of PTMs and protein synthesis with respect to HCV, although other viruses such as HIV have shown these trends. However, our findings were in agreement with Blackham et al. who showed these types of regulations in HCV infected hepatocytes [61].

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Genes associated with protein synthesis, modulation and metabolism. Genes shown in red are up-regulated, while down-regulated genes are shown in green. Genes shown in black have no expression changes.

Transcriptional regulation and signal transduction related genes

Several genes associated with transcriptional regulation and signal transductions were identified (Figure 10). Most genes were down-regulated both in HCV initial fibrosis and cirrhosis. However, ANKHD1, CRAMP1L, FOXK2, GTF2B, HMGN2, NR1I3, PAX8, RUNX2 and SUSD4 genes showed increased trend in cirrhotic samples. Xu et al. also reported up-regulation of liver enriched transcriptional factors in infected HCV tissues [62]. A comprehensive study is needed to address the exact role of these genes. Some genes associated with signal transduction like CACNB3, PCSK5, TMEM100 and VDAC3 were up-regulated in initial fibrosis. Up-regulation of signal transduction related genes in HCC due to HCV and HBV is previously reported [63,64]. This can lead to the hypothesis that cirrhosis due to HCV genotype 3a may lead to HCC in future.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Expression of transcription and signal transduction related genes. Clustering was performed by Cluster 3.0 software.

Transport and ion channel transport related genes

A number of genes encoding cellular and ion transport functions were also recognized (Figure 11). AMICA1, HHLA3, KIF17, KIF1A and SLC10A5 showed significant high expression, while, CLPB, K1024, MUC6, SCGN and MT1E expression was down in cirrhotic arrays. Previous studies related to HCV infection and entry has shown that HCV replication needs regulations in cellular trafficking [65-67]. High expression of SLC10A5, also known as putative bile acid transporter gene, it may indicate dysregulation of liver as well as pancreas in patients infected with HCV. Up-regulation of kinesin family members KIF17 or KIF2B may upset inner segment and synaptic terminal and consequently results in cell death [68].

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Regulation of transport and ion channel related genes by HCV. Clustering results for differentially expressed genes between HCV infected patients with initial fibrosis and cirrhosis according to their functions. Genes shown in red are up-regulated, while down-regulated genes are shown in green. Genes shown in black have no expression changes.

Others significant genes

Irrespective of above mentioned genes; we have also found several genes related to DNA binding proteins, DNA replication, morphogenesis, reproduction and liver function (Figure 12). The expression of DNA binding protein and replication genes change from initial fibrosis to cirrhosis. The high expression in early fibrosis may underlie a repair mechanism, whereas, reduced gene expression in cirrhosis stage may indicate that virus has overcome the repair mechanism for its replication resulting in total deterioration of liver cells and structure. It is interesting to note that some genes associated with nervous system and vision pathways were also identified. A lot of uncharacterized genes were also recognized. The link of expression of vision related genes with HCV is not clear.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Differential expression of genes associated with DNA binding, DNA replication, liver function, nervous system, vision and uncharacterized. Clustering results for differentially expressed genes between HCV infected patients with initial fibrosis and cirrhosis according to their functions. Clustering was performed by Cluster 3.0 software. Genes shown in red are up-regulated, while down-regulated genes are shown in green. Genes shown in black have no expression changes. Gene expression profiles were presented on a 2-fold change scale.

Real time RT-PCR validation of results

Analysis with real time RT-PCR confirmed that the selected genes were significantly differentially expressed in initial fibrosis and cirrhotic samples (Figure 13). Although, we observed higher fold induction values with real time RT-PCR, however, the trend was same between both analysis indicating reproducible gene expression patterns. CASPASE9, OAS2 and TGFBR2 genes showed up-regulation, whereas, FAM14B gene expression was down-regulated in early fibrosis. These findings open a new spectrum of genetic markers to differentiate fibrosis from cirrhosis.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Validation of microarray data by RT-PCR. (A) Quantification of differential expression of randomly selected genes by real time RT-PCR. (B) Expression profile of selected genes from our microarray study.

A comprehensive review of literature revealed that very few studies related to HCV expression based studies leading to initial to final stage cirrhosis have been carried out in association to genotype. Walters et al. used J6/JFH (genotype 2a) infected Huh-7.5 cells for the expression analysis of host in response to virus at different time points of infection. They observed that TGF-beta signaling genes were up-regulated 72 hrs post infection, it induces ROS activity. Liver injury during chronic HCV infection is immune mediated [37]. Hagist et al. compared differentially expressed genes in patients with mild and severe iron depleted HCV genotype 1a liver samples with hereditary hemochromatosis. They found many ISG genes dysregulated in HCV infection and related to RNA processing and carcinogenesis [69]. We also found up-regulation of ISG genes in initial fibrosis stage as host defense system try to limit the viral pathogenesis. A study conducted by Blackham et al. in JFH1 infected huh-7 cells by microarray identified genes mainly apoptosis, proliferation, intracellular transport and cellular mechanism [61]. A few studies to explore the role of individual genes of HCV in pathogenesis have been studied in association to genotype. Shah et al. compared the expression of oxidative stress related genes in blood samples and found that the expression of COX-2, iNOs and VEGF was high in 3a in comparison to 1a [70]. We found the expression is high in initial fibrosis stage and down regulation at the advance stage of liver cirrhosis.

Conclusion

There are limited studies available dealing with gene expression profiling in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic (initial fibrosis) patients infected with HCV. In this study, we have observed that HCV infection due to genotype 3a has widespread effects on host gene expression involved in apoptosis, metabolism, transport, transcriptional regulation and immune response. This gives comprehensive information about the pathogenesis caused by HCV genotype 3a leading from initial to end stage liver cirrhosis. Although, HCV genotype 3a showed same pathways activation caused by other genotypes, further studies are required to understand the mechanism by which different genotypes can affect various pathways. Meanwhile, we found that expression of these genes was significantly changed within initial and final stage of fibrosis. A study describing the progression of these genes in mild and severe fibrosis stages (F2 and F3) will be required for future perspectives.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

WA and BI contributed equally to this work. They analyzed the data and wrote paper. All work was performed under supervision of SH. We all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors' information

WA and BI are research officers at CEMB, while SH (PhD Molecular Biology) is Principal Investigator at CEMB, University of the Punjab, Lahore.

Contributor Information

Waqar Ahmad, Email: waqarchemist@hotmail.com.

Bushra Ijaz, Email: bijaz_009@yahoo.com.

Sajida Hassan, Email: sajihassan2004@yahoo.com.

References

  1. Memon MI, Memon MA. Hepatitis C: an epidemiological review. J Viral Hepat. 2002;9:84–100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2002.00329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO. Global distribution of hepatitis A, B and C, 2001. Weakly Epidimiological Records. 2002;77:41–48. [Google Scholar]
  3. Marcellin P, Asselah T, Boyer N. Fibrosis and disease progression in hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2002;36:S47–56. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Afdhal NH, Nunes D. Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1160–1174. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dienstag JL, McHutchison JG. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:231–264. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.010. quiz 214-237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(Suppl 1):S5–10. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000168638.84840.ff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bataller Ramón, Brenner David A. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(2):209–218. doi: 10.1172/JCI24282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zois CD, Baltayiannis GH, Karayiannis P, Tsianos EV. Systematic review: hepatic fibrosis-regression with therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28(10):1175–1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Friedman SL. Reversibility of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis--is it all hype? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;4(5):236–237. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harbin WP, Robert NJ, Ferrucci JT Jr. Diagnosis of cirrhosis based on regional changes in hepatic morphology: a radiological and pathological analysis. Radiology. 1980;135:273–283. doi: 10.1148/radiology.135.2.7367613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gressner AM. The cell biology of liver fibrogenesis-an imbalance of proliferation, growth arrest and apoptosis of myofibroblasts. Cell Tissue Res. 1998;292:447–452. doi: 10.1007/s004410051073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Arthur MJ. Reversibility of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis following treatment for hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1525–1528. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Adinolfi LE, Gambardella M, Andreana A, Tripodi MF, Utili R, Ruggiero G. Steatosis accelerates the progression of liver damage of chronic hepatitis C patients and correlates with specific HCV genotype and visceral obesity. Hepatology. 2001;33:1358–1364. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.24432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C in the United States. Hepatology. 2002;36:S74–83. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Parkes J, Guha IN, Roderick P, Rosenberg W. Performance of serum marker panels for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2006;44:462–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A, Christidis C, Mal F, Kazemi F, de Ledinghen V, Marcellin P, Dhumeaux D, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2005;41:48–54. doi: 10.1002/hep.20506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ngo Y, Munteanu M, Messous D, Charlotte F, Imbert-Bismut F, Thabut D, Lebray P, Thibault V, Benhamou Y, Moussalli J, Ratziu V, Poynard T. A prospective analysis of the prognostic value of biomarkers (FibroTest) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Chem. 2006;52:1887–1896. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.070961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Asselah T, Bieche I, Laurendeau I, Paradis V, Vidaud D, Degott C, Martinot M, Bedossa P, Valla D, Vidaud M, Marcellin P. Liver gene expression signature of mild fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:2064–2075. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith MW, Walters KA, Korth MJ, Fitzgibbon M, Proll S, Thompson JC, Yeh MM, Shuhart MC, Furlong JC, Cox PP, Thomas DL, Philips JD, Kushner JP, fausto N, Carithers RL Jr, Katze MG. Gene expression patterns that correlate with hepatitis C and early progression to fibrosis in liver transplant recipients. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:179–187. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang H, Shiffman ML, Cheung RC, Layden TJ, Friedman S, Abar OT, Yee L, Chokkalingam AP, Schrodi SJ, Chan J, Catanese JJ, Leong DU, Ross D, Hu X, Monto A, McAllister LB, Border S, White T, Sninsky JJ, Wright TL. Identification of two gene variants associated with risk of advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1679–1687. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Machida K, Cheng KT, Sung VM, Levine AM, Foung S, Lai MM. Hepatitis C virus induces toll-like receptor 4 expression, leading to enhanced production of beta interferon and interleukin-6. J Virol. 2006;80:866–874. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.866-874.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang H, Shiffman ML, Friedman S, Venkatesh R, Bzowej N, Abar OT, Rowland CM, Catanese JJ, Leong DU, Sninsky JJ, Layden TJ, Wright TL, White T, Cheung RC. A 7 gene signature identifies the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007;46:297–306. doi: 10.1002/hep.21695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zeremski M, Petrovic LM, Chiriboga L, Brown QB, Yee HT, Kinkhabwala M, Jacobson IM, Dimova R, Markatou M, Talal AH. Intrahepatic levels of CXCR3-associated chemokines correlate with liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2008;48:1440–1450. doi: 10.1002/hep.22500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeremski M, Dimova R, Brown Q, Jacobson IM, Markatou M, Talal AH. Peripheral CXCR3-associated chemokines as biomarkers of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1774–1780. doi: 10.1086/646614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sharma A, Chakraborti A, Das A, Dhiman RK, Chawla Y. Elevation of interleukin-18 in chronic hepatitis C: implications for hepatitis C virus pathogenesis. Immunology. 2009;128:e514–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.03021.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gutierrez-Reyes G, Gutierrez-Ruiz MC, Kershenobich D. Liver fibrosis and chronic viral hepatitis. Arch Med Res. 2007;38:644–651. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shao RX, Hoshida Y, Otsuka M, Kato N, Tateishi R, Teratani T, Shiina S, Taniguchi H, Moriyama M, Kawabe T, Omata M. Hepatic gene expression profiles associated with fibrosis progression and epatocarcinogenesis in hepatitis C patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(13):1995–1999. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i13.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Caillot F, Hiron M, Goria O, Gueudin M, Francois A, Scotte M, Daveau M, Salier JP. Novel serum markers of fibrosis progression for the follow-up of hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Am J Pathol. 2009;175:46–53. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ahmad W, Ijaz B, Javed FT, Gull S, Kausar H, Sarwar MT, Asad S, Shahid I, Sumrin A, Khaliq S, Jahan S, Pervaiz A, Hassan S. A comparison of four fibrosis indexes in chronic HCV: Development of new fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hosack DA, Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Lane HC, Lempicki RA. Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE. Genome Biol. 2003;4(10):R70. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-10-r70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pazienza V, Clément S, Pugnale P, Conzelmann S, Pascarella S, Mangia A, Negro F. Gene expression profile of Huh-7 cells expressing hepatitis c virus genotype 1b or 3a core proteins. Liver Int. 2009;9(5):661–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lau DT, Luxon BA, Xiao SY, Beard MR, Lemon SM. Intra-hepatic gene expression profiles and alpha-smooth muscle actin patterns in hepatitis C virus induced fibrosis. Hepatology. 2005;42(2):273–281. doi: 10.1002/hep.20767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shackel NA, McGuinness PH, Abbott CA, Gorrell MD, McCaughan GW. Insights into the pathobiology of hepatitis C virus-associated cirrhosis: Analysis of intrahepatic differential gene expression. Am J Pathol. 2002;160(2):641–654. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64884-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith MW, Yue ZN, Korth MJ, Do HA, Boix L, Fausto N, Bruix J, Carithers RL Jr, Katze MG. Hepatitis C virus and liver disease: global transcriptional profiling and identification of potential markers. Hepatology. 2003;38(6):1458–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.hep.2003.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lan L, Gorke, Rau SJ, Zeisel MB, Hildt E, Himmelsbach K, Carvajal-Yepes M, Huber R, Wakita T, Schmitt-Graeff A, Royer C, Blum HE, Fischer R, Baumert TF. Hepatitis C virus infection sensitizes human hepatocytes to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in a caspase 9-dependent manner. J Immunol. 2008;181:4926–4935. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kubo F, Ueno S, Hiwatashi K, Sakoda M, Kawaida K, Nuruki K, Aikou T. Interleukin 8 in human hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with cancer cell invasion of vessels but not with tumor angiogenesis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:800–807. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Walters KA, Syder AJ, Lederer SL, Diamond DL, Paeper B, Rice CM, Katze MG. Genomic analysis reveals a potential role for cell cycle perturbation in HCV-mediated apoptosis of cultured hepatocytes. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000269. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Milleron RS, Bratton SB. Heat shock induces apoptosis independently of any known initiator caspase-activating complex. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(25):16991–7000. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512754200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fischer R, Baumert T, Blum HE. Hepatitis C virus infection and apoptosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(36):4865–4872. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i36.4865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang HT, Kong JP, Ding F, Wang XQ, Wang MR, Liu LX, Wu M, Liu ZH. Analysis of gene expression profile induced by EMP-1 in esophageal cancer cells using cDNA Microarray. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(3):392–398. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i3.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Calabrese F, Pontisso P, Pettenazzo E, Benvegnu L, Vario A, Chemello L, Alberti A, Valente M. Liver cell apoptosis in chronic hepatitis C correlates with histological but not biochemical activity or serum HCV-RNA levels. Hepatology. 2000;31:1153–1159. doi: 10.1053/he.2000.7123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Malhi H, Guicciardi ME, Gores GJ. Hepatocyte death: a clear and present danger. Physiol Rev. 2010;90(3):1165–94. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00061.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ciccaglione RA, Marcantonio C, Tritarelli E, Tataseo P, Ferraris A, Bruni R, Dallapiccola B, Gerosolimo G, Costantino A, Rapicetta M. Microarray analysis identifies a common set of cellular genes modulated by different HCV replicon clones. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:309. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Behrens C, Feng L, Kadara H, Kim HJ, Lee JJ, Mehran R, Hong WK, Lotan R, Wistuba II. Expression of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 in non-small cell lung carcinoma and preneoplastic lesions. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(1):34–44. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Davis RS. Fc receptor-like molecules. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:525–560. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kochi Y, Yamada R, Suzuki A, Harley JB, Shirasawa S, Sawada T, Bae SC, Tokuhiro S, Chang X, Sekine A, Takahashi A, Tsunoda T, ohnishi Y, Kaufman KM, Kang CP, Kang C, Otsubo S, Yamura W, Mimori A, Koike T, Nakamura Y, Saazuki T, Yamamoto K. A functional variant in FCRL3, encoding Fc receptor-like 3, is associated with rheumatoid arthritis and several autoimmunities. Nat Genet. 2005;37:478–485. doi: 10.1038/ng1540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Miller I, Hatzivassiliou G, Cattoretti G, Mendelsohn C, Dalla-Favera R. IRTAs: a new family of immunoglobulinlike receptors differentially expressed in B cells. Blood. 2002;99:2662–2669. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.8.2662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Polson AG, Zheng B, Elkins K, Chang W, Du C, Dowd P, Yen L, Tan C, Hongo JA, Koeppen K, Ebens A. Expression pattern of the human FcRH/IRTA receptors in normal tissue and in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Int Immunol. 2006;18:1363–1373. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxl069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Itoh T, Fujita N, Kanno E, Yamamoto A, Yoshimori T, Fukuda M. Golgi-resident small GTPase Rab33B interacts with Atg16L and modulates autophagosome formation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:2916–2925. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-12-1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tanida I, Fukasawa M, Ueno T, Kominami E, Wakita T, Hanada K. Knockdown of autophagy-related gene decreases the production of infectious hepatitis C virus particles. Autophagy. 2009;5:937–945. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.7.9243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Dring MM, Morrison HM, McSharry PB, Guinan JK, Hagan R. Irish Research Consortium; Farrelly OC, Gardiner CM. Innate immune genes synergize to predict increased risk of chronic disease in hepatitis C virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:5736–5741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016358108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hovanessian AG. Interferon-induced and double-stranded RNA-activated enzymes: a specific protein kinase and 29,59-oligoadenylate synthetases. J Interferon Res. 1991;11:199–205. doi: 10.1089/jir.1991.11.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pawlotsky JM. Hepatitis C virus resistance to antiviral therapy. Hepatology. 2000;32(5):889–896. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.19150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Syed GH, Amako Y, Siddiqui A. Hepatitis C virus hijacks host lipid metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Simula MP, De Re V. Hepatitis C virus-induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction: a focus on recent advances in proteomics. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2010;4(10-11):782–793. doi: 10.1002/prca.201000049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Diamond DL, Syder AJ, Jacobs JM, Sorensen CM, Walters KA, Proll SC, McDermott JE, Gritsenko MA, Zhang Q, Zhao R, Metz TO, Camp DG, Waters KM, Smith RD, Rice CM, Katze MG. Temporal proteome and lipidome profiles reveal hepatitis C virus-associated reprogramming of hepatocellular metabolism and bioenergetics. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(1):e1000719. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Alvaro V, Touraine P, Raisman Vozari R, Bai-Grenier F, Birman P, Joubert D. Protein kinase C activity and expression in normal and adenomatous human pituitaries. Int J Cancer. 1992;50:724–730. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910500510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Craxi A, Pasqua P, Giannuoli G, Di Stefano R, Simonetti RG, Pagliaro L. Tissue markers of hepatitis B virus infection in hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1984;31:55–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. O'Brian C, Vogel VG, Singletary SE, a Ward NE. Elevated protein kinase C expression in human breast tumor biopsies relative to normal breast tissue. Cancer Res. 1989;49:3215–3217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tsai JH, Hsieh YS, Kuo SJ, Chen ST, Yu SY, Huang CY, Chang AC, Wang YW, Tsai MT, Liu JY. Alteration in the expression of protein kinase C isoforms in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2000;161:171–175. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(00)00597-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Blackham S, Baillie A, Al-habibi F, Remlinger K, You S, Hamatake R, mcGarvey MJ. Gene expression profiling indicates the roles of host oxidative stress, apoptosis, lipid metabolism, and intracellular transport genes in the replication of hepatitis C virus. J Virol. 2010;84:5404–5414. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02529-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Xu L, Hui L, Wang S, Gong J, Jin Y, Wang Y, Ji Y, Wu X, Han Z, Hu G. Expression profiling suggested a regulatory role of liver-enriched transcription factors in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3176–3181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Xu XR, Huang J, Xu ZG, Qian BZ, Zhu ZD, Yan Q, Cai T, Zhang X, Xiao HS, Qu J, Liu F, Huang QH, Cheng ZH, Li N G, Du JJ, Hu W, Shen KT, Lu G, Fu G, Zhong M, Xu SH, Gu WY, Huang W, Zhao XT, Hu GX, Gu JR, Chen Z, Han ZG. Insight into hepatocellular carcinogenesis at transcriptome level by comparing gene expression profiles of hepatocellular carcinoma with those of corresponding noncancerous liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:15089–15094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.241522398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Okabe H, Satoh S, Kato T, Kitahara O, Yanagawa R, Yamaoka Y, Tsunoda T, Furukawa Y, Nakamura Y. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in human hepatocellular carcinomas using cDNA microarray: identification of genes involved in viral carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2129–2137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Bost AG, Venable D, Liu L, Heinz BA. Cytoskeletal requirements for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA synthesis in the HCV replicon cell culture system. J Virol. 2003;77:4401–4408. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.7.4401-4408.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hamamoto I, Nishimura Y, Okamoto T, Aizaki H, Liu M, Mori Y, Abe T, Suzuki T, Lai MM, Miyamura T, Moriishi K, Matsuura Y. Human VAP-B is involved in hepatitis C virus replication through interaction with NS5A and NS5B. J Virol. 2005;79:13473–13482. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.21.13473-13482.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lai CK, Jeng KS, Machida K, Lai MM. Association of hepatitis C virus replication complexes with microtubules and actin filaments is dependent on the interaction of NS3 and NS5A. J Virol. 2008;82:8838–8848. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00398-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Insinna C, Humby M, Sedmak T, Wolfrum U, Beshase JC. Different roles for KIF17 and kinesin II in photoreceptor development and maintenance. Dev Dyn. 2009;238:2211–2222. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hagist S, Sültmann H, Millonig G, Hebling U, Kieslich D, Kuner R, Balaguer S, Seitz HK, Poustka A, Mueller S. In vitro-targeted gene identification in patients with hepatitis C using a genome-wide microarray technology. Hepatology. 2009;49(2):378–86. doi: 10.1002/hep.22677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jahan S, Khaliq S, Ijaz B, Ahmad W, Hassan S. Role of HCV Core gene of genotype 1a and 3a and host gene Cox-2 in HCV-induced pathogenesis. Virol J. 2011;8:155. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Translational Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES