Every year, approximately 300,000 Americans suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates are dismal, approximately 6.4%.1 Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) can restart the heart and provide life-saving audible cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions to aid victims. For patients with ventricular fibrillation, rapid defibrillation with CPR can improve chances of survival to more than 50%.2–4 AEDs can be easily and effectively used by untrained laypersons and are located in public places such as airports, recreation centers, banks, casinos, churches, gyms, and schools. 5
Despite the life-saving potential of AEDs, they are of no value if they cannot be located and brought to the victim. Further, there is no US map of AED locations, nor do we even know where all the AEDs are located. Devices are purchased by distributors who then sell them on the internet, in bulk, or individually. AED registration is the responsibility of the device owner and the requirements and process differs significantly by region. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently highlighted how the lack of registration data makes device recalls and surveillance for potential adverse events challenging. Additionally, this creates a barrier to the use of AEDs when they are needed. Imagine bystanders assisting the resuscitation of a victim in a public area, unaware that an AED is located less than 100 feet away inside a nearby store. They have called 911, and the local emergency medical service (EMS) personnel are en route, but the emergency dispatchers don’t realize that an AED is nearby. The very limited timeframe for defibrillation success is certainly more likely to be achieved if those bystanders not providing CPR could be guided to a device that had been previously located and mapped. The problem is easy to understand, and the solution is easy to imagine. Indeed, once AEDs are located and locatable, all sorts of other opportunities arise.
Envisioning an AED Map
In theory, bystanders during an emergency in some public places will find the location of an AED—when they see a displayed AED sign with a red heart and lightning bolt blaze. Unfortunately these usually wall mounted devices may be walked past daily, and yet never sufficiently registered in memory to be recalled when needed. With current technologies we can do better. Imagine instead an internet and mobile media based nationwide map of those devices. Such a Google-style map could easily be read from a smart phone application that would automatically note the location of the rescuer’s phone and the location of nearby AEDs to direct the rescuer to the nearest one. This app could be preloaded on the phone or the information could be embedded in other apps used routinely to locate resources, people, or directions. A bystander calling 911 could also be directed to an AED located by emergency dispatchers: “Emergency medical personnel are on their way. Continue chest compressions. There is an AED in the nearby bookstore, just at the checkout register. If available, send someone who is not performing chest compressions to retrieve the AED.”
Use of an application to locate an AED might also be used to enhance other aspects of emergency care via linkage surveys or other assessments designed to systematically evaluate AED use: Was there a real arrest? Was an AED deployed? Did it function? These and other questions—perhaps including those about later psychological stress among bystanders—could populate a nationwide database to support resuscitation epidemiology. Opportunities to investigate this kind of community health care are more challenging without the ability to locate AEDs.
As helpful as maps may be in revealing where the AEDs are, from a public health perspective they may be at least as helpful in revealing where they aren’t. The American Heart Association recommends that AEDs should be within three minutes of an arrest victim and, by that standard, there are certainly innumerable “AED deserts” where no device is present. While fire suppression equipment is ubiquitous in certain buildings, blanketing the nation with AEDs may be costly and implausible. Maps of where arrests are more likely (based on population demographics time of day, or activity) might be overlaid with maps of AED location, and prior bystander use of AEDs, to identify these deserts and suggest new placements and more effective deployment. Future studies are needed to evaluate if health systems should focus on improving access in AED deserts or optimizing existing locations and actual use.
Populating an AED Map
Approximately, 1 million AEDs have been sold in the US in the past 20 years and locating each one that is installed at a location precisely enough to create a useful public map presents a challenge. The challenge seems short-term however. New AEDs could be equipped with geographic transponders and become, effectively, self-locating. But before that happens, how do we find all the installed AEDs currently in public locations?
A new approach to overcome this challenge would be to use “crowd sourcing”, a method whereby the public becomes engaged in broad community data collection. The science of crowdsourcing suggests that because the task is offered to an undefined large group of individuals, it engages those who are interested in addressing the specific problem, likely to complete the task, and in some cases contribute with the most pertinent and novel ideas. Examples of crowdsourcing include scientist successfully engaging the public to participate in online gaming to fold proteins (i.e. Foldit, Fold.it) in order to develop drug therapies for HIV and cancer.6 The project Galaxy Zoo has also successfully harnessed the talents of more than 250,000 online volunteers to better characterize galaxies and generate new astronomy science. There are many major public health challenges that might be investigated with crowd sourcing—harnessing the power of collective thinking to unlock the solution to a problem (e.g., universal health care access, malnutrition problems in the U.S., immobility problems in the elderly).
A contest or gaming framework could help motivate a systematic scavenger hunt for the nation’s AEDs, with prizes for the most AEDs located, or the most AEDs that have also been located by other teams (to create an internal validation of location--perhaps the only thing worse than not knowing an AED is nearby is wasting time searching for an AED that isn’t there at all). Crowdsourcing along with traditional methods could be used to ensure that device locations were periodically updated.
The crowdsourcing technique was used by the DARPA Network Challenge (DNC)- a contest to find ten, 8-foot red balloons moored in parks across the contiguous United States.7 The first person to report the correct location of all ten balloons would receive a prize. A distributed human sensor approach modeled around social networks was considered an innovative and novel technique for addressing the challenge. A team of faculty, researchers and students identified the 10 balloons in <9 hours. The speed with which the DNC was solved offers a quantitative measure for the effectiveness of emerging new forms of social networking and crowdsourcing in engaging and assembling teams to address an important and challenging task. The DNC highlighted that with the proper incentives, whether they be financial, academic, or fostering a greater public or community good, today’s “networked society” is eager to come together virtually to solve a challenge and to innovate. When this challenge pertains to the American public health system and the well-being of our citizens, the response could be equally powerful, if not greater.
Mobile phones equipped with cameras could be used to photograph AEDs using formats with automatically geographically encoded information; these could be e-mailed to an AED database registry. Mobile applications could further facilitate this process, allowing individuals to record and transmit annotations about location (e.g. the AED is on the 10th floor next to the north elevators). Similar data could be electronically transmitted via microblogging sites (e.g. Twitter), social networking sites (e.g. Facebook), location based service applications (e.g. Foursquare, Gowalla, BrightKite) or other broadly used internet-based sites which allow for rapid information transmission and receipt.
Several existing innovative apps are beginning to facilitate this exchange of AED information but for their optimal use we still need a high percentage of inclusion of the current devices, up to date locations across diverse geographic regions, and non-proprietary integration with 911 computer aided dispatch software. Synergy of these apps and broader coverage would help with development of a national registry with data entry maintained by local crowdsourcing and traditional data collection. An app with only AED location data would likely have limited uptake. As there are currently >500,000 mobile apps, widespread access to AED location data will require integration and linkage of this information with regularly used apps that provide information such as weather reports, internet access (e.g. WiFi maps), directions (e.g. Google Maps), medical care (e.g. first aid instructions), nearby resources (banks, supermarkets, parking lots). Needed also are evaluations of how these novel technologies impact outcomes and a continued focus on the chain of survival--- improving bystanders’ recognition of cardiac arrest and willingness to initiate resuscitation therapies.
Decades of work confirm that AEDs can save lives and they have been widely distributed in public places. As 20% of arrests occur in public locations, the next phase in optimizing AED implementation is in improving access and use of existing devices. Simply having devices installed is not enough—they need to be easily locatable. In the same manner that the public increasingly relies on phones to provide information about nearby stores, restaurants, and gas stations in their surroundings--there are opportunities to use phones and networks to locate and share information about relevant emergency devices (e.g. AEDs) in times of need.
Acknowledgments
Sources of Funding
NIH, K23 Grant 10714038, Pilot funding: Physio-Control Seattle, Washington; Zoll Medical, Boston MA; Cardiac Science, Bothell, Washington; Philips Medical Seattle, Washington.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Disclosures
These funders played no role in the "design and conduct of the commentary; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the commentary."
Asch: US Government employee, no conflicts to disclose
References
- 1.Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, Carnethon MR, Dai S, de Simone G, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Greenlund KJ, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Ho PM, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McDermott MM, Meigs JB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Rosamond WD, Sorlie PD, Stafford RS, Turan TN, Turner MB, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2011 Update A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:e18–e209. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, Travers A, Christenson J, McBurnie MA, Zalenski R, Becker LB, Schron EB, Proschan M the Public Access Defibrillation Trial Investigators. Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(7):637–646. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weisfeldt ML, Sitlani CM, Ornato JP, Rea T, Aufderheide TP, Davis D, Dreyer J, Hess EP, Jui J, Maloney J, Sopko G, Powell J, Nichol G, Morrison LJ the ROC Investigators. Survival after application of automatic external defibrillators before arrival of the emergency medical system: evaluation in the resuscitation outcomes consortium population of 21 million. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1713–1720. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rea TD, Olsufka M, Bemis B, White L, Yin L, Becker L, Copass M, Eisenberg M, Cobb L. A population based investigation of public access defibrillation: Rose of emergency medical services care. Resuscitation. 2010;81:163–167. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aufderheide T, Hazinski MF, Nichol G, Steffens SS, Buroker A, McCune R, Stapleton E, Nadkarni V, Potts J, Ramirez RR, Eigel B, Epstein A, Sayre M, Halperin H, Cummins RO American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Office of State Advocacy. Circulation. 2006;113(9):1260–1270. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.172289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cooper S, Khatib F, Treuille A, Barbero J, Lee J, Beenen M, Leaver-Fay A, Baker D, Popović Z Foldit players. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature. 2010;466:756–760. doi: 10.1038/nature09304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.DARPA.com. [Accessed January 2, 2012];DARPA Network Challenge. https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/Default.aspx.