Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2012 May;121(4):551–560. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07714.x

Subunit composition of α5-containing nicotinic receptors in the rodent habenula

Petra Scholze *, Gabriele Koth *, Avi Orr-Urtreger , Sigismund Huck *
PMCID: PMC3350326  EMSID: UKMS47942  PMID: 22380605

Abstract

Gene association studies in humans have linked the α5 subunit gene CHRNA5 to an increased risk for nicotine dependence. In the CNS, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) that contain the α5 subunit are expressed at relatively high levels in the habenulo-interpeduncular system. Recent experimental evidence furthermore suggests that α5-containing receptors in the habenula play a key role in controlling the intake of nicotine in rodents. We have now analysed the subunit composition of hetero-oligomeric nAChRs in the habenula of postnatal day 18 (P18) C57Bl/6J control mice and of mice with deletions of the α5, the β2, or the β4 subunit genes. Receptors consisting of α3β4*1 clearly outnumbered α4β2*-containing receptors not only in P18 but also in adult mice. We found low levels of α5-containing receptors in both mice (6%) and rats (2.5% of overall nAChRs). Observations in β2 and β4 null mice indicate that although α5 requires the presence of the β4 subunit for assembling (but not of β2), α5 in wild-type mice assembles into receptors that also contain the subunits α3, β2, and β4.

Keywords: gene deletion, habenula, interpeduncular nucleus, nicotine abuse, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, subunit composition


Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are pentameric ion channels consisting of five identical (homopentameric) or different (heteropentameric) subunits. The predominant hetero-oligomeric nAChRs in the CNS contain the subunits α4β2, whereas α3β4 prevail in the PNS (McGehee and Role 1995). However, the presence of the additional subunits α2, α5, α6, and β3 in distinct regions of the nervous system gives rise to a much larger variety of receptors (Gotti et al. 2006). Although the reason for such diversity is unknown it provides the possibility to develop therapeutic nicotinic ligands that target specific types of receptors.

Unlike most of the other α subunits, α5 stands out as it always requires the presence of at least one other α, along with β2 or β4 (Ramirez-Latorre et al. 1996; Fucile et al. 1997; Gerzanich et al. 1998). We have recently reported that in the superior cervical ganglion (SCG) of wild-type (WT) C57Bl/6J mice, α5 assembles only into α3β4 receptors (David et al. 2010). Consequently, all α5-containing receptors are lost in the SCG of mice lacking the β4 subunit. These results are in keeping with the rat SCG, where about 25-30% of heteromeric nAChRs are of the α3β4α5 type (Mao et al. 2006). However, several parts of the CNS such as the hippocampus, the striatum, the cerebral cortex, or the thalamus, express receptors that contain α5 in combination with the subunits α4 and β2 (Mao et al. 2008). Yet, in the rodent habenulo-interpeduncular system (the habenular complex), α5 reportedly co-assembles not only with β2 but also with β4 (Grady et al. 2009).

Earlier efforts to identify gene polymorphisms that may lead to nicotine addiction have highlighted the CHRNA5/CHRNA3 gene cluster on chromosome 15 as a potential candidate (Berrettini et al. 2008; Bierut et al. 2008). Hence, allelic variations in the α5 subunit gene which result in a decreased function of receptors increase vulnerability to tobacco addiction (Bierut et al. 2008). The brain region primarily accountable for this may be the habenulo-interpeduncular system. Its anatomical connections allow the habenula to act as a node to link the forebrain to the midbrain regions that are involved in regulating emotional behaviors such as pain, stress, and anxiety (Hikosaka 2010). In fact, recent observations assign α5-containing nAChRs in the habenular complex a key role in controlling nicotine consumption (Fowler et al. 2011; Frahm et al. 2011) and nicotine withdrawal (Salas et al. 2009). α5 may require the presence of the β4 subunit, because decreased signs of nicotine withdrawal have been observed not only in mice lacking α5 but also in β4 knockout (KO) animals (Salas et al. 2004, 2009; De Biasi and Salas 2008).

As the pharmacological and biophysical properties of α4β2* differ significantly from α3β4* receptors (McGehee and Role 1995), knowledge of subunits that co-assemble with α5 is important for understanding the role of habenular nAChRs in nicotine abuse and dependence. We therefore re-analysed nAChRs found in the habenula of rats and mice and paid particular attention to α5-containing receptors.

Materials and methods

Generation and purification of antibodies

All antibodies were targeted against the cytoplasmic loop region of mouse nAChR subunits as previously published for anti-α3, anti-α4, anti-α5, anti-β2, and anti-β4 (David et al. 2010). The immunoprecipitation (IP) efficacy and specificity of our anti-α3, -α4, -β2, and -β4 antibodies has previously been tested with recombinant receptors expressed in HEK-293 cells, and by comparing the IP results in the SCG of α5β2 and α5β4 double KO (Kedmi et al. 2004) mice (which express pure α3β4 and α3β2 receptors, respectively) with polyethyleneglycol precipitation of all solubilized receptors. Furthermore, we took advantage of nAChR-KO mice to exclude false-positive reactions of our anti-α5, -β2, and -β4 antibodies (Figure S1, David et al. 2010). We now probed the efficacy of the anti-α5 antibody, which was generated by immunizing rabbits with the loop region of the α5-subunit, on receptors generated by replacing the cytoplasmic loop of the β2 subunit amino acids (aa) 345–415 by the loop of α5 (aa 362–418), and by co-expression of this chimera with α4 in HEK-293 cells (see Figure S1).

The proteins used for immunizing rabbits against the subunits α2 and α6 consisted of maltose-binding protein, fused to loop regions covering aa 361–444 (anti-α2) and aa 359–432 (anti-α6), respectively. The antibodies were affinity-purified using the corresponding glutathione S-transferase fusion protein coupled to Affi-Gel 10 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and probed with recombinant receptors expressed in HEK-293 cells as well as with native materials taken from the cerebellum, the C. striatum, and the interpeduncular nucleus (Figure S1).

Animals and preparation of habenula

Experiments were performed on WT C57Bl/6J mice, and on mice with deletions of the nAChR subunit genes α5 (Wang et al. 2002), β2 (Picciotto et al. 1995), and β4 (Kedmi et al. 2004). β2 KO mice were generously provided by J.-P. Changeux (Pasteur Institute, Paris), α5 KO and β4 KO by Avi Orr-Urtreger (Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv). Mice used in this study were backcrossed into C57Bl/6J background for 6 (β4), 7 (α5) or 12 (β2) generations after germ line transmission.

Sprague–Dawley rats (Oncins France strain A) were obtained from the Institute of Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna (Himberg, Austria) and bred in-house. All animals were kept in thermo stable rooms (21°C) on a light–dark schedule of 10 : 14 h in group cages with food and water freely accessible. Animal care and experiments are in accordance with the European Communities Council directive (86/609/EEC) and the Austrian federal law governing animal experimentation (Tierversuchsgesetz TVG 501/1989).

The great majority of experiments was performed with pre-pubertal mice and rats (mostly P18, range 17–19 days), killed by decapitation. Adult mice (6–8 weeks) and rats (300–600 g) were deeply anesthetized with diethylether before decapitation. We dissected entire habenulae, though hetero-pentameric nAChRs are highly enriched in the medial habenula (MHb) with only few such receptors in the lateral habenula (Clarke et al. 1985; Wada et al. 1989; Perry and Kellar 1995; Le Novere et al. 1996; Perry et al. 2002; Whiteaker et al. 2002). Habenulae were collected in Ca2+-free Tyrode’s solution: 150 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. After removal of the Tyrode’s solution, tissue was flash-frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for later use.

Immunoprecipitation of [3H]-epibatidine labeled receptors

Receptors were solubilized in 2% Triton X-100 lysis buffer: 50 mM Tris–HCl pH = 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2% Triton X-100, supplemented with one complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN, USA) per 10 mL buffer. Following one ultrasound pulse of 5 s duration at 30% energy level, samples were left for 2 hours at 4°C and thereafter centrifuged at 16 000 g for 15 min at 4°C. 130 μL clear supernatant from 0.5 habenulae (rat), 1.5 habenulae (WT, β2 KO), or 4 habenulae (β4 KO), respectively, were incubated with 20 μL 10 nM [3H]-epibatidine and 7 μg antibody in 30 μL phosphate-buffered saline (10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 2.7 mM KCl, 140 mM NaCl, pH = 7.4) on a shaking platform at 4°C over night. Non-specific binding was determined by adding 300 μM nicotine to half of the samples.

Heat-killed, formalin-fixed Staphylococcus aureus cells carrying protein A (Standardized Pansorbin-cells; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) were centrifuged at 2300 g for 5 min at 4°C. Pansorbin-pellets were washed twice with IP-High (50 mM Tris–HCl pH = 8.3, 600 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100), once in IP-Low (50 mM Tris–HCl pH = 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% Triton X-100), and re-suspended with IP-Low. Twenty microliters of this suspension of Pansorbin cells were added to the above-mentioned cocktail containing the antibody, solubilized receptors, and [3H]-epibatidine for 2 h at 4°C on a shaking platform. Samples were centrifuged at 2300 g for 5 min at 4°C and washed twice with IP-High and once with IP-Low at 2300 g for 1 min at 4°C. Pellets were re-suspended in 200 μL 1 M NaOH and subjected to liquid scintillation counting. For sequential immunoprecipitation (IP) experiments, the supernatant was saved, and precipitated with a second antibody as described above.

Quantification of protein contents in membrane preparations and lysates

All protein quantifications were performed using the BCA Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Reagents

General chemical reagents were from Merck-VWR-Jencons, Radnor, PA. Substances not explicitly mentioned were from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA).

Data analysis

All data are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical analyses was performed with GraphPad Prism version 4.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (anova), followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test, were performed when appropriate.

Results

Antibodies for IP assays

Subunit-specific antibodies are essential pre-requisites for the analysis of the subunit composition of nAChR subtypes. The generation of antibodies directed against the subunits α3, α4, α5, β2 and β4 has been described in our previous publication (David et al. 2010). Anti-α2 and anti-α6 antibodies were newly generated. For a detailed characterization of antibodies, see the Methods section, Figure S1, and supplemental Materials provided in David et al. (2010).

nAChRs in the mouse and rat habenula have similar subunit profiles

We assess the overall number of [3H]-epibatidine binding sites by the combined use of anti-β2 plus anti-β4 antibodies (David et al. 2010). Hence, IPs with a combination of the two antibodies will show 100% of heteropentameric receptors. We found the overall number of receptors was similar in P18 mice and rats (301.3 ± 18.4 fmol/mg lysate protein in mice, n = 13; 252.8 ± 32.7 fmol/mg lysate protein in rats, n = 3, Fig. 1). In addition, the subunit profiles of nAChRs in the habenula of WT mice and rats are very much alike (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The overall number of nAChRs and the occurrence of distinct subunits are similar in the mouse and rat habenula. nAChRs from habenula of wild-type P18 mice (a) or P18 rats (b) were solubilized, labeled with 1 nM [3H]-epibatidine and immunoprecipitated with each of the subunit-specific antibodies indicated at the abscissa. Non-specific binding was measured in the presence of 300 μM nicotine and subtracted from the overall to obtain the specific binding shown in the figure. The mouse data represent means ± SEM of 3 (α2 and α6), 10 (α3), 7 (α4), 9 (α5), 23 (β2), or 21 (β4) independent experiments, each performed with duplicate or triplicate measurements. The rat data represent means ± SEM of three independent experiments, each performed with duplicate or triplicate measurements. The 100% values are determined by the combined use of anti-β2 plus anti-β4 antibodies, a protocol which precipitates all hetero-oligomeric receptors. NS: not significantly different from zero (p > 0.05, one sample Student’s t-test).

The majority of receptors of both species contain the subunits α3 (84% in mouse and 80% in rat) and/or β4 (82% of nAChRs in mouse and 72% in rat, Fig. 1). In either rats or mice, 33–45% of receptors contain the subunits α4 and/or β2 (Fig. 1). Given that more β2 than β4-containing receptors were found in the adult rodent habenula in a previous publication (Grady et al. 2009) we checked in mice whether the β2/β4 proportion might be developmentally regulated. In fact, when the numbers of β2- were compared with β4-containing receptors in one and the same assay, their rate of occurrence increased from 0.58 ± 0.03 (means ± SEM, n = 22 assays) in P18 mice to 0.88 ± 0.06 (means ± SEM, n = 6 assays) at 6–8 weeks old animals (significantly different p < 0.01, Student’s t-test). Hence, we find that β4-containing receptors outnumbered β2 not only in P18 but also in adult mice.

A small percentage of receptors include the accessory subunit α5 (6% in mouse and 2.5% in rat, both values significantly different from zero, p < 0.01 for rats and p < 0.001 for mice, one sample Student’s t-test; and both values significantly differ from each other, p < 0.05, one-way anova followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc multiple comparison test). Again, significantly higher levels of α5-containing receptors (about 27% of overall) have been reported particularly in the adult rat by Grady et al. (2009). When analysing the number of α5-containing receptors in adult rats we found a moderate increase from 2.50 ± 0.34% at P18 (means ± SEM, n = 3 assays) to 3.25 ± 0.11% (n = 7 assays) of overall receptors in adult rats (significantly different p < 0.05, Student’s t-test). We did not detect measurable amounts of the subunits α2 and α6 in either species (levels not significantly different from zero, p > 0.05, n = 3, one sample Student’s t-test; Fig. 1).

Most receptors in the mouse habenula consist of α3β4*

We used sequential IP to assess the association of the subunits α3 and β4 in WT mice. In this set of experiments, our anti-α3 antibody precipitated 269.2 ± 28.3 fmol/mg [3H]-epibatidine-labelled receptors (n = 5, Fig. 2). When tissue extracts were first cleared with anti-β4 (the ‘clearing’ antibody, see Mao et al. 2008), the number of receptors precipitated from the residual supernatant with anti-α3 (as ‘capturing’ antibody) was significantly (p < 0.001, paired Student’s t-test) reduced to low but still measurable levels (15.9 ± 4.4 fmol/mg, n = 5, significantly different from zero, p < 0.05, one sample Student’s t-test, Fig. 2), suggesting that a small number of α3-containing receptors occur without β4. In fact, levels of α3 significantly exceeded β4 by 40.0 ± 9.7 fmol/mg (paired Student’s t-test, p < 0.01, n = 10) when α3- and β4-containing receptors were determined in one IP experiment, again suggesting that in the P18 WT mouse habenula, α3-containing receptors occur without β4.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

α3 only co-assembles with β4, and all α5 subunits assemble into α3α5β4β2-receptors in the mouse habenula. Wild-type mouse habenula extracts were first immunoprecipitated with the ‘clearing’ antibodies indicated at the abscissa (the ‘clearing’ antibody, see Mao et al. 2008). The resulting supernatants were then immunoprecipitated with antibodies against α3 (a), α5 (c, d), β2 (f), or β4 (b, e). Data are means ± SEM of 5 (a–c) or 3 (e, f) independent experiments, each performed with duplicate or triplicate measurements. *Significantly different from zero (p < 0.05, one sample Student’s t-test). NS: not significantly different from zero (p > 0.05, one sample Student’s t-test).

In contrast, the anti-β4 antibody precipitated 234.3 ± 29.8 fmol/mg [3H]-epibatidine without pre-clearing, but only 5.8 ± 4.9 fmol/mg [3H]-epibatidine after clearing with anti-α3 (n = 5, value not significantly different from zero, p > 0.05, one sample Student’s t-test, Fig. 2). These observations suggest that the great majority of receptors are of the α3β4* type but that a small number of α3β2* receptors exist as well. α3β2 receptors in the medial habenula have previously been shown with [125I]α-conotoxin MII autoradiography (Whiteaker et al. 2002).

A significant number of receptors in the mouse habenula contain both β2 and β4 subunits

A significant number of receptors in the P18 mouse habenula appears to contain both β2 and β4 subunits, because the algebraic sum of receptors precipitated by either anti-β2 or anti-β4 antibodies significantly exceeds 100% (by 18% or 56 fmol/mg, n = 11, paired Student’s t-test, p < 0.001). This finding is supported by the observation that after pre-clearing with anti-β4, β2 levels are reduced by 65.7 ± 2.9 fmol/mg (n = 3, Fig. 2f). In contrast, β4 levels are reduced by 108.2 ± 4.9 fmol/mg after pre-clearing with anti-β2 (n = 3, Fig. 2e).

α5-containing receptors include the subunits β2 and β4

We next investigated the possible association of the α5 subunit with the subunits β2 and β4 by sequential IP. As shown in Fig. 2c, the anti-α5 antibody precipitated 21.5 ± 5.4 fmol/mg [3H]-epibatidine-labeled receptors. Upon pre-clearing extracts with anti-β4 in paired experiments, the receptors precipitated with anti-α5 dropped to levels not significantly different from zero (2.1 ± 1.3 fmol/mg, n = 5, p > 0.05, one sample Student’s t-test). Likewise, levels of α5-containing receptors fell from 18.7 ± 5.3 fmol/mg to 2.2 ± 3.4 fmol/mg after clearing with anti-β2, indicating an association of α5 and β2 as well (n = 5, not significantly different from zero, p > 0.05, one sample Student’s t-test, Fig 2d). As all β4 subunits co-assemble with α3 into one receptor (Fig. 2b), these observations suggest a receptor consisting of α3α5β4β2. It should, however, be noted that any protocol that causes a reduction of α5-containing receptors that are already expressed at low levels pushes measurements to the limits of detection. Therefore these conclusions must be treated with caution. Interestingly, α5-containing receptors are unaffected in β2 null mice but are almost eliminated in the β4 KO (Fig. 3c), showing that α5 requires the presence of β4 but not of β2 for assembly. As some α5-containing receptors remain in β4 null mice (2.0 ± 0.4 fmol/mg, n = 5, p < 0.01, one sample Student’s t-test, significantly different from zero; Fig. 3c) a few receptors may assemble from just α3, α5, and β2 in this genotype. Still, deletion of the α5 subunit did not affect the expression of nAChRs at large or receptors containing the subunits α3, α4, β2, or β4 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Levels of nAChR in habenulae of wild-type and indicated null mice. nAChRs from habenula of wild-type mice and of mice lacking distinct nAChR subunit genes (indicated at the abscissa) were solubilized, labeled with 1 nM [3H]-epibatidine and immunoprecipitated with the subunit-specific antibodies against α3 (a), α4 (b), α5 (c), β2 (d), or β4 (e). The total number of receptors in panel (f) was judged by a combined precipitation of anti-β2 and anti-β4 antibodies for WT and α5-KO mice, and by precipitation with anti-β4 and anti-β2 antibodies in β2-KO and β4-KO mice, respectively. Non-specific binding was measured in the presence of 300 μM nicotine and subtracted from the overall to obtain the specific binding shown in the figure. Data are means ± SEM of 3–6 (KO) or 6–22 (WT) independent experiments, each performed with triplicate measurements. Column data were compared using one-way anova followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc multiple comparison test. Significantly different from WT with *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001. n.d.: not determined. NS: not significantly different from zero (p > 0.05, one sample Student’s t-test).

Two major entities of nAChRs in the mouse habenula: α3β4*, and α4β2*: Evidence from KO models

Results from mouse models with deletions of the β2 or the β4 subunit nicely match our IP experiments with anti-β2 and anti-β4 antibodies. Whereas an IP using anti-β2 precipitates 46% of WT receptors (Fig. 1), 36% of overall receptors are also lost in β2 null mice (Fig. 3f). Likewise, an IP using anti-β4 precipitates 84% of receptors in WT (Fig. 1), while 67% of overall receptors are lost in the β4 KO (Fig. 3f). The great majority of the α3 subunit appears to co-assemble with β4, because levels of α3-containing receptors were largely reduced (by about 80%) – but not eliminated – in the β4 KO model (Fig. 3a).

About 70% of nAChRs containing the α4 subunit are lost in the β2 KO model, indicating the extent to which α4β2 receptors are present in the WT mouse habenula (Fig. 3b). However, about 30% of α4-containing receptors are also lost in the β4 KO, implying that some α4 normally co-assembles with β4 (Fig. 3b), as previously suggested by Grady et al. (2009). We propose that the latter receptors also contain the subunit α3, because sequential IP with anti-α3 as the clearing antibody removes all β4-containing receptors in the supernatant (Fig. 2). The combined presence of α3 and α4 in one receptor is in keeping with the observation that the algebraic sum of receptors containing the subunits α3 and α4 significantly exceeds 100% (by 20% or 56 fmol/mg lysate protein, n = 5, paired Students t-test, p < 0.05).

It is worth noting that levels of β2- and β4-containing receptors are not significantly affected by deletions of the β4 and β2 subunit genes, respectively (Fig. 3d and e), indicating that the expression of these subunits is tightly regulated as in the mouse SCG (David et al. 2010).

Discussion

Soon after the identification of neuronal-type nAChRs it became clear that a fairly large variety of such receptors are expressed at a remarkable density in the habenula, a pair of small nuclei above the thalamus (Wada et al. 1989; Hill et al. 1993; Zoli et al. 1998). More recently, α5-containing receptors in the habenulo-interpeduncular system have attracted considerable interest due to their involvement in controlling nicotine intake (Fowler et al. 2011; Frahm et al. 2011), in mediating nicotine withdrawal symptoms (Salas et al. 2009), and in affecting anxiety-related behavior (Gangitano et al. 2009). The subunit composition of hetero-pentameric nAChRs in the habenula has lately been analysed in rats, in WT mice, and in mice lacking the nAChR subunits β2 and β3 (Grady et al. 2009). Accordingly, the authors identified receptors that contain the subunits α2, α3, α4, α5, α6, β2, β3, and β4. The accessory subunit α5 co-assembled into both β2- and β4-containing receptors, even though levels of α5-containing receptors were not diminished in β2 KO mice (Grady et al. 2009). Whether α5 as an accessory subunit co-assembles with β2 or β4 is of importance, because the pharmacological and biophysical properties of β2- and β4-containing receptors differ significantly (Luetje and Patrick 1991; Fenster et al. 1997). α5 furthermore affects the function of both α3β4 (Gerzanich et al. 1998; Fischer et al. 2005; Frahm et al. 2011) and β2-containing (Ramirez-Latorre et al. 1996; Gerzanich et al. 1998) receptors. By re-assessing nAChRs occurring in the rodent habenula we therefore paid particular attention to α5-containing receptors and to which extent this subunit co-assembles with β2 and β4.

Our results are in keeping with previous observations that the habenula of mouse and rat is a rich source of nAChRs of great diversity. We found the overall number of hetero-oligomeric receptors (assessed by a combined use of β2 plus β4 antibodies), and their subunit composition is similar in rat and mice. Consistent with results by Grady et al. (2009) we precipitated receptors containing the subunits α3, α4, α5, β2, and β4. We also determined similar overall numbers of receptors in WT mice (301 versus 273 fmol/mg lysate protein by Grady et al. 2009), and we agree on the presence of major populations of α3β4* and α4β2*, an intermediate population of α3α4β4, and a minor population of α3β2 receptors. We were, however, unable to detect in P18 animals the low levels of α2 (2%) or α6 (3%) reported by Grady et al. (2009) in adult mice. Our sequential IPs indicate that all β4 co-assembles with α3, making α3β4* (about 85%) the most abundant nAChRs in the mouse habenula. In contrast, the data by Grady et al. (2009) suggest that β2-containing receptors (66%) outnumber β4-containing receptors (34%) in the adult mouse habenula. As we mostly used pre-pubertal animals, this discrepancy might be due to the age of the animals. However, we found more β4- than β2-containing receptors in adult mice as well, even though the frequency of β2 relative to β4-containing receptors increased by the age of the animals.

Previous observations in the rat MHb by autoradiography with [125I]-epibatidine in the presence or absence of ligands that block binding to α4β2 or α3β2 receptors estimated that α3β4-like binding accounts for > 85% of receptors, even though the authors caution that this value is almost certainly too high (Perry et al. 2002). In separate binding experiments using homogenates, Perry et al. (2002) maintain that α3β4-like [125I]-epibatidine binding still represented approximately 65% of the total sites. In keeping with this observation, binding in the rat MHb of [3H]-cytisine is relatively weak (40 fmol/mg protein) compared with [125I]-epibatidine binding (186 fmol/mg protein, Perry and Kellar 1995). Structures of the neocortex typically have a near 1 : 1 ratio of [3H]-epibatidine versus [3H]-cytisine binding (Perry and Kellar 1995). Because of its high affinity for most nAChRs, radiolabeled epibatidine has proven particularly useful for receptor autoradiography (see Perry and Kellar 1995; Zoli et al. 1998; Sharples et al. 2000; Whiteaker et al. 2000, 2002; Baddick and Marks 2011). Cytisine, on the other hand, has a higher affinity for α4β2- compared with α3β4-receptors and has been used at low concentrations to mask α4β2-containing receptors in epibatidine receptor autoradiography (see Perry et al. 2002; Baddick and Marks 2011).

Based on quantitative autoradiography, Zoli et al. (1998) also reported enriched binding of [3H]-epibatidine contrasting with much lower signals by both [3H]-nicotine and [3H]-cytisine in the mouse MHb. As [3H]-epibatidine binding was not reduced in β2 KO animals the authors conclude that ‘the vast majority of binding in this area consists of receptors that do not contain the β2 subunit’ (Zoli et al. 1998). Still, binding of [3H]-cytisine was diminished by > 50% in the MHb (medial part) in β2 KO mice. Furthermore, binding of [125I]-epibatidine measured autoradiographically in the MHb was unaffected not only in β2 but also in β4 KO mice (Baddick and Marks 2011), suggesting that autoradiography with radiolabeled epibatidine (in the absence of additional ligands) may not detect even significant losses (see our Fig. 3f and supplemental Table 3 by Grady et al. 2009) of overall nAChRs in the MHb of KO animals. Conversely, autoradiography with radiolabeled epibatidine in the presence of cytisine or A-85380 (a protocol which predominantly unveils β4-containing receptors, Perry and Kellar 1995; Perry et al. 2002; Whiteaker et al. 2000, 2002; Baddick and Marks 2011), shows significantly reduced binding in animals devoid of α3 (by 95%, Whiteaker et al. 2002) or β4 (by more than 75%, Baddick and Marks 2011). Although the experiments with KO animals conducted by Baddick and Marks (2011) demonstrate that both β2 and β4 are prominently expressed in the mouse MHb, they do not provide quantitative data on the presence of β4-relative to β2-containing receptors.

Functional experiments demonstrate that both β2- and β4-containing receptors are expressed in the habenula of rats and/or mice. Hence, patch clamp recordings from slices of the mouse ventromedial habenula show amplitudes of currents induced by 10 μM nicotine, 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium, or cytisine in MHb neurons that do not differ between WT and β2 KO animals (Zoli et al. 1998). The moderate potency of the β2-preferring antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine (Mulle et al. 1991), the pronounced inhibition by the α3β4-selective antagonist α-conotoxin AuIB in inhibiting nicotine-induced currents, and the relative potency and efficacy of cytisine (Quick et al. 1999) furthermore indicate the presence of α3β4-type somatic membrane receptors in acutely dissociated habenular neurons of the rat.

However, the acetylcholine-induced 86Rb+ efflux from mouse habenular synaptosomes is almost eliminated in β2 KO animals, suggesting that all pre-synaptic receptors contain the subunit β2 (Grady et al. 2009). Yet, whether β2- or β4 receptors make up the majority of the receptors in the rodent habenula cannot be deduced from these functional experiments. Taken together, with the exception of Grady et al. (2009), none of the above mentioned reports are in conflict, and some are in keeping with our own observation that the majority of receptors in the MHb contain the subunits α3 and β4.

Receptors that contain the accessory subunit α5 rely on the presence of β4 for assembly in the habenula, as shown by our observation that the great majority of α5-containing receptors are lost in β4 null animals. However, our sequential IPs suggest that β2 is also an integral part of α5-containing receptors. The existence of α3α5β4β2 receptors is in keeping with observations by Grady et al. (2009) who reported that in rats, immunodepletion with a β2-specific antibody significantly reduced the level of α5-containing receptors. We can also confirm the findings in this report that the number of α5-containing receptors is unaffected in β2 KO mice. Interestingly, 86Rb+ efflux from habenular synaptosomes induced by acetylcholine is largely reduced not only in β2 KO (Grady et al. 2009) but also in α5-KO mice (Fowler et al. 2011), suggesting receptors that contain both subunits. Still, the great majority of α3β4* receptors do not contain α5, and deletion of the α5 subunit gene does not affect the expression levels of either α3 or β4. Figure 4 illustrates nAChRs occurring in the habenula of mice as deduced from the data shown in Figs 1 and 2.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

nAChRs occurring in the habenula of P18 wild-type mice. The diagram illustrates the proposed subunit composition of hetero-oligomeric receptors in P18 mice as deduced from data shown in Figs 1 and 2. The model is constructed from our observations that (a) the subunit β4 occurs only in combination with α3 (Fig. 2); (b) the subunit α5 occurs at an overall frequency of 6% (Fig. 1) and always co-assembles with α3β2β4 (Fig. 2); (c) some receptors contain both subunits α3 and α4, because the algebraic sum of receptors containing the subunits α3 and α4 significantly exceeds 100% (by 20% or 56 fmol/mg lysate protein, n = 5, paired Student’s t-test, p < 0.05); (d) the subunits β2 and β4 may also occur in one and the same receptor, because the algebraic sum of receptors containing the subunits β2 and β4 significantly exceeds 100% (by 18% or 56 fmol/mg, n = 11, paired Student’s t-test, p < 0.001), and because sequential IP with either anti-β2 or anti-β4 as clearing antibodies also removes significant quantities of β4- and β2-containing receptors, respectively (Fig. 2). The model is compatible with our two observations that (e) a small number of α3-containing receptors remains in the β4 KO (they assemble with β2, similar to the mouse SCG, see David et al. 2010); (f) about 30% of α4-containing receptors are lost in the β4 KO, and about 30% of α4-containing receptors remain in the β2 KO (Fig. 3), indicating that α4 co-assembles not only with β2 but also with β4.

With 6% in P18 mice and 2.5% in P18 rats, α5-containing receptors comprise only a small fraction of overall receptors in the habenula. These levels are significantly lower than has previously been reported (8.5% in mice; 27.6% in rats, Grady et al. 2009) which suggests either a developmental regulation, that the efficacy of our anti-α5 antibody is too low, or that the IPs by Grady et al. (2009) detect an undue high number of α5-containing receptors. To address the first alternative we investigated the expression of α5-containing receptors in adult rats but found only a moderate increase (from 2.5% to 3.2% of overall receptors). In order to check the efficacy of our anti-α5 antibody we created a chimera where the cytoplasmic loop of the β2 subunit was replaced by the corresponding region of α5 (see Materials and methods). When expressed together with α4, the resulting receptors were precipitated equally well with both our anti-α5 and anti-α4 antibody, suggesting that the anti-α5 antibody has an efficiency > 90% (Figure S1). In native tissue, our antibody precipitated 24% and 20%α5-containing receptors in the mouse (David et al. 2010) and rat SCG (P. Scholze, unpublished observation), respectively. These data are in general agreement with observations by Mao et al. (2006) who reported 25–30% of α5-containing receptors in the rat SCG.

α5-containing receptors are important players in controlling addictive (Salas et al. 2009; Fowler et al. 2011; Frahm et al. 2011) as well as anxiety-related behavior (Gangitano et al. 2009). The altered anxiety-related response in mice lacking the β4 subunit (Salas et al. 2003) might therefore be due to missing α3β4* receptors which contain α5 as well. How these receptors mediate the behavioral effects is unclear at present. Single-cell RT-PCR suggests that the α3, α5, β2, and β4 subunits may be present in all cultured rat habenular neurons (Sheffield et al. 2000). These observations do not point at a particular cell type where somatic α3α5β4β2 receptors are concentrated to serve a specific function.

Alternatively, α5-containing receptors might preferentially be targeted to distinct axonal projections. Neurons in the MHb are cholinergic (Grady et al. 2009), glutamatergic (McGehee et al. 1995; Girod et al. 2000), or even both cholinergic and glutamatergic (Ren et al. 2011) and mainly project to the interpeduncular nucleus (Hikosaka 2010). Aversive high doses of nicotine activated the interpeduncular nucleus (IPN) in mice, reflected by increased Fos immunoreactivity (Fowler et al. 2011). This effect was almost completely abolished in α5 knockout mice, suggesting that α5-containing receptors support glutamatergic transmission in the IPN under these conditions (Fowler et al. 2011). However, nicotine applications facilitated the frequency of glutamatergic miniature excitatory post-synaptic potentials recorded from chick IPN neurons (co-cultured with explants of the habenula) if treated with α5-antisense-oligonucleotides (Girod et al. 2000). Recent experimental evidence furthermore suggests that the function of α3β4 receptors is reduced by the presence of α5 (and even more by its D397R variant, Frahm et al. 2011). These data are in line with our previous observations in mouse SCG neurons that deletion of α5 greatly enhances the outflow of [3H]-norepinephrine in response to pre-synaptic nAChR activation (Fischer et al. 2005). It is worth mentioning that ACh-induced release of [3H]-ACh from IPN synaptosomes is unaltered in α5 null mice, suggesting that α5-containing receptors may not reside on cholinergic axons that innervate the IPN (Grady et al. 2009).

To conclude, we have re-investigated the subunit compositions of hetero-oligomeric nAChRs in the habenula of mice and rats. We found that β4- clearly outnumbers β2-containing receptors and that although α5 requires the presence of β4 (but not β2) it assembles into a nAChR containing α3β4 as well as β2 in the mouse habenula. Our results explain previous observations that nicotine withdrawal symptoms are abolished both in α5 and β4 KO mice (Salas et al. 2004, 2009). Considering our observations it will also be interesting to see whether a loss of control in nicotine consumption occurs not only upon deletion of the α5 (Fowler et al. 2011) but also of the β4 subunit gene. Gene association studies have linked nicotine abuse to gene variants of the CHRNA5/CHRNA3 gene cluster on chromosome 15 (Berrettini et al. 2008; Bierut et al. 2008). Hence, despite their rare occurrence, the α3α5β2β4 receptor may play a key role in controlling nicotine dependence.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund, Project P19325-B09.

Glossary

Abbreviations used

IP

immunoprecipitation

IPN

interpeduncular nucleus

KO

knockout

MHb

medial habenula

nAChR

nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

P18

postnatal day 18

SCG

superior cervical ganglion

WT

wild-type

Footnotes

1

The asterisk indicates that one or more additional subunits may assemble into the receptor

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Supporting information

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article:

Figure S1. Confirmation of the subunitspecificity of anti-α2, anti-α5, and anti-α6 antibodies by recombinant and native nAChRs.

jnc0121-0551-SD1.pdf (103.4KB, pdf)

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

References

  1. Baddick CG, Marks MJ. An autoradiographic survey of mouse brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors defined by null mutants. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011;82:828–841. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berrettini W, Yuan X, Tozzi F, Song K, Francks C, Chilcoat H, Waterworth D, Muglia P, Mooser V. α-5/α-3 nicotinic receptor subunit alleles increase risk for heavy smoking. Mol. Psychiat. 2008;13:368–373. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bierut LJ, Stitzel JA, Wang JC, et al. Variants in nicotinic receptors and risk for nicotine dependence. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2008;165:1163–1171. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarke PBS, Schwartz RD, Paul SM, Pert CB, Pert A. Nicotinic binding in rat brain: autoradiographic comparison of [3H]acetylcholine, [3H]nicotine, and [125I]-bungarotoxin. J. Neurosci. 1985;5:1305–1315. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-05-01307.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. David R, Ciuraszkiewicz A, Simeone X, Orr-Urtreger A, Papke RL, McIntosh JM, Huck S, Scholze P. Biochemical and functional properties of distinct nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the superior cervical ganglion of mice with targeted deletions of nAChR subunit genes. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010;31:978–993. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Biasi M, Salas R. Influence of neuronal nicotinic receptors over nicotine addiction and withdrawal. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008;233:917–929. doi: 10.3181/0712-MR-355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fenster CP, Rains MF, Noerager B, Quick MW, Lester RAJ. Influence of subunit composition on desensitization of neuronal acetylcholine receptors at low concentrations of nicotine. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:5747–5759. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-15-05747.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fischer H, Orr-Urtreger A, Role LW, Huck S. Selective deletion of the α5 subunit differentially affects somatic-dendritic versus axonally targeted nicotinic ACh receptors in mouse. J. Physiol. 2005;563:119–137. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.075788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fowler CD, Lu Q, Johnson PM, Marks MJ, Kenny PJ. Habenular α5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake. Nature. 2011;471:597–601. doi: 10.1038/nature09797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Frahm S, Slimak MA, Ferrarese L, et al. Aversion to nicotine is regulated by the balanced activity of β4 and α5 nicotinic receptor subunits in the medial habenula. Neuron. 2011;70:522–535. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fucile S, Barabino B, Palma E, Grassi F, Limatola C, Mileo AM, Alema S, Ballivet M. α5 Subunits forms functional α3β4α5 nAChRs in transfected human cells. NeuroReport. 1997;8:2433–2436. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199707280-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gangitano D, Salas R, Teng Y, Perez E, De Biasi M. Progesterone modulation of α5 nAChR subunits influences anxiety-related behavior during estrus cycle. Genes Brain Behav. 2009;8:398–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00476.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gerzanich V, Wang F, Kuryatov A, Lindstrom J. α5 Subunit alters desensitization, pharmacology, Ca++ permeability and Ca++ modulation of human neuronal α3 nicotinic receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998;286:311–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Girod R, Barazangi N, McGehee D, Role LW. Facilitation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:2715–2725. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00145-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gotti C, Zoli M, Clementi F. Brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: native subtypes and their relevance. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006;27:482–491. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2006.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grady SR, Moretti M, Zoli M, Marks MJ, Zanardi A, Pucci L, Clementi F, Gotti C. Rodent habenulo-interpeduncular pathway expresses a large variety of uncommon nAChR subtypes, but only the α3β4* and α3β3β4* subtypes mediate acetylcholine release. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:2272–2282. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5121-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hikosaka O. The habenula: from stress evasion to value-based decision-making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010;11:503–513. doi: 10.1038/nrn2866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill JA, Zoli M, Bourgeois J-P, Changeux J-P. Immuncytochemical localization of a neuronal nicotinic receptor: the β2 subunit. J. Neurosci. 1993;13:1551–1568. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-04-01551.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kedmi M, Beaudet AL, Orr-Urtreger A. Mice lacking neuronal acetylcholine receptor β4-subunit and mice lacking both α5- and β4-subunits are highly resistant to nicotine-induced seizures. Physiol. Genomics. 2004;17:221–229. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00202.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Le Novere N, Zoli M, Changeux J-P. Neuronal nicotinic receptor α6 subunit is selectively concentrated in catecholaminergic nuclei of the rat brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1996;8:2428–2439. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Luetje CW, Patrick J. Both α- and β-subunits contribute to the agonist sensitivity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J. Neurosci. 1991;11:837–845. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-03-00837.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mao D, Yasuda RP, Fan H, Wolfe BB, Kellar KJ. Heterogeneity of nicotinic cholinergic receptors in rat superior cervical and nodosa ganglia. Mol. Pharmacol. 2006;70:1693–1699. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.027458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mao D, Perry DC, Yasuda RP, Wolfe BB, Kellar KJ. The α4β2α5 nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is resistant to up-regulation by nicotine in vivo. J. Neurochem. 2008;104:446–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McGehee DS, Role LW. Physiological diversity of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed by vertebrate neurons. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1995;57:521–546. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.002513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McGehee DS, Heath MJS, Gelber S, Devay P, Role LW. Nicotine enhancement of fast excitatory synaptic transmission in CNS by presynaptic receptors. Science. 1995;269:1692–1696. doi: 10.1126/science.7569895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mulle C, Vidal C, Benoit P, Changeux J-P. Existence of different subtypes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the rat habenulo-indepeduncular system. J. Neurosci. 1991;11:2588–2597. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-08-02588.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Perry DC, Kellar KJ. [3H]Epibatidine labels nicotinic receptors in rat brain: an autoradiographic study. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1995;275:1030–1034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Perry DC, Xiao Y, Nguyen HN, Musachio JL, Davial-Garcia MI, Kellar KJ. Measuring nicotinic receptors with characteristics of α4β2, α3β2 and α3β4 subtypes in rat tissues by autoradiography. J. Neurochem. 2002;82:468–481. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00951.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Lena C, Bessis A, Lallemand Y, Le Novere N, Vincent P, Pich EM, Brulet P, Changeux J-P. Abnormal avoidance learning in mice lacking functional high-affinity nicotine receptor in the brain. Nature. 1995;374:65–67. doi: 10.1038/374065a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Quick MW, Ceballos RM, Kasten M, McIntosh JM, Lester RAJ. α3β4 subunit-containing nicotinic receptors dominate function in rat medial habenula neurons. Neuropharmacology. 1999;38:769–783. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(99)00024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ramirez-Latorre J, Yu CR, Qu X, Perin F, Karlin A, Role LW. Functional contributions of α5 subunit to neuronal acetylcholine receptor channels. Nature. 1996;380:347–351. doi: 10.1038/380347a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ren J, Qin C, Hu F, Tan J, Qiu L, Zhao S, Feng G, Luo M. Habenula “cholinergic” neurons co-release glutamate and acetylcholine and activate postsynaptic neurons via distinct transmission modes. Neuron. 2011;69:445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Salas R, Pieri F, Fung B, Dani JA, De Biasi M. Altered anxiety-related responses in mutant mice lacking the β4 subunit of the nicotinic receptor. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:6255–6263. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-15-06255.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Salas R, Pieri F, De Biasi M. Decreased signs of nicotine withdrawal in mice null for the β4 acetylcholine receptor subunit. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:10035–10039. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1939-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Salas R, Sturm R, Boulter J, De Biasi M. Nicotinic receptors in the habenulo-interpeduncular system are necessary for nicotine withdrawal in mice. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:3014–3018. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4934-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sharples CGV, Kaiser S, Soliakov L, et al. UB-165: A novel nicotinic agonist with subtype selectivity implicates the α4β2* subtype in the modulation of dopamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:2783–2791. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02783.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sheffield EB, Quick MW, Lester RAJ. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit mRNA expression and channel function in medial habenula neurons. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:2591–2603. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00138-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wada E, Wada K, Boulter J, Deneris E, Heinemann S, Patrick J, Swanson LW. Distribution of alpha2, alpha3, alpha4, and beta2 neuronal nicotinic receptor subunit mRNAs in the central nervous system: a hybridization histochemical study in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 1989;284:314–335. doi: 10.1002/cne.902840212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang N, Orr-Urtreger A, Chapman J, Rabinowitz R, Nachmann R, Korczyn AD. Autonomic function in mice lacking α5 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit. J. Physiol. 2002;542:347–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Whiteaker P, McIntosh JM, Luo S, Collins AC, Marks MJ. 125I-α-ConotoxinMII identifies a novel nicotinic acetylcholine receptor population in mouse brain. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000;57:913–925. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Whiteaker P, Peterson CG, Xu W, McIntosh JM, Paylor R, Beaudet AL, Collins AC, Marks MJ. Involvement of the α3 subunit in central nicotinic binding populations. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:2522–2529. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02522.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zoli M, Lena C, Picciotto MR, Changeux J-P. Identification of four classes of brain nicotinic receptors using β2 mutant mice. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:4461–4472. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04461.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jnc0121-0551-SD1.pdf (103.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Neurochemistry are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES