Abstract
The potential toxicity of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) for humans and the environment represents an emerging issue. Since the aquatic environment represents the ultimate sink for NP deposition, the development of suitable assays is needed to evaluate the potential impact of NPs on aquatic biota. The immune system is a sensitive target for NPs, and conservation of innate immunity represents an useful basis for studying common biological responses to NPs. Suspension-feeding invertebrates, such as bivalves, are particularly at risk to NP exposure, since they have extremely developed systems for uptake of nano and microscale particles integral to intracellular digestion and cellular immunity. Evaluation of the effects of NPs on functional parameters of bivalve immunocytes, the hemocytes, may help understanding the major toxic mechanisms and modes of actions that could be relevant for different NP types in aquatic organisms.In this work, a battery of assays was applied to the hemocytes of the marine bivalve Mytilus galloprovincialis to compare the in vitro effects of different n-oxides (n-TiO2, n-SiO2, n-ZnO, n-CeO2) chosen on the basis of their commercial and environmental relevance. Physico-chemical characterization of both primary particles and NP suspensions in artificial sea water-ASW was performed. Hemocyte lysosomal and mitochondrial parameters, oxyradical and nitric oxide production, phagocytic activity, as well as NP uptake, were evaluated. The results show that different n-oxides rapidly elicited differential responses hemocytes in relation to their chemical properties, concentration, behavior in sea water, and interactions with subcellular compartments. These represent the most extensive data so far available on the effects of NPs in the cells of aquatic organisms. The results indicate that Mytilus hemocytes can be utilized as a suitable model for screening the potential effects of NPs in the cells of aquatic invertebrates, and may provide a basis for future experimental work for designing environmentally safer nanomaterials.
Introduction
The potential toxicity of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) for humans and the environment represents an emerging issue, due to the continuous development and production of manufactured nanomaterials [1], [2]. Since NPs tend to end up in waterways, their uptake and effects in the aquatic biota represent a major concern [3]–[5]. Apart from traditional ecotoxicity testing, it has been underlined that more specific assays like immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, oxidative stress, may help understanding the major toxic mechanisms and modes of actions that could be relevant for different NP types also in aquatic organisms [6]. According to [7], invertebrate tests are well suited to generate reproducible and reliable nanotoxicity data: invertebrates represent about 95% of animal species, have an important ecological role, and represent potential transfer of NPs through food chains. In these organisms, potential routes of exposure are ingestion or entry through epithelial surfaces; moreover, they have highly developed processes for cellular internalization of nano- and micro-scale particles (endocytosis and phagocytosis), that are integral to key physiological functions such as intracellular digestion and cellular immunity [8].
The immune system is considered as sensitive target for the effect of NPs in mammals [9], [10] and potential interactions of NPs with immune cells represent a major issue for both therapeutic use and possible detrimental effects on human health. Since different types of NPs may induce immunostimulation or immunosuppression in different experimental models, immunotoxicity tests have been widely applied in an attempt to design representative and robust assays that can be utilized for effective screening of NP-induced immunomodulatory effects [10]–[13].
Invertebrates lack adaptive immunity: however, they are endowed with a potent innate immune system [14]. Conservation of the general mechanisms of innate immunity from invertebrates to mammals is a key feature that represents an useful basis for studying common biological responses to environmental contaminants, including NPs.
Bivalve mollusks are a relevant ecological group, widespread in freshwater, estuarine and marine environments, with many edible species, and widely utilized to evaluate the effects of different contaminants. Increasing evidence support the hypothesis that bivalves may represent a significant target group for NP toxicity [15]. In these organisms, the blood cells, the hemocytes, are responsible for cell-mediated immunity through phagocytosis and various cytotoxic reactions [16]. Although bivalve hemocytes are extremely heterogeneous, in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis granular hemocytes represent the dominant cell type and are characterised by high phagocytic activity and capacity for oxyradical production [17]. Responses of mussel hemocytes to bacterial signals, cytokines, hormones, as well as to a variety of contaminants, have been largely characterized ([15] and references quoted therein). In these cells, the immune function is modulated by conserved components of kinase-mediated cell signaling [18].
We have previously shown that in vitro exposure to NPs (both carbon based and n-oxides), in the same concentration range as that generally utilized in mammalian cells, induced significant changes in immune parameters in mussel hemocytes through modulation of stress activated p38 MAPK [19], [20]. The results suggested that distinct responses (resulting in immunotoxicity/immunomodulation) may be elicited by different types of NPs. In this work, in order to investigate the possible specificity of the hemocyte response NPs, a battery of functional assays was applied to compare the effects of different n-oxides (n-TiO2, n-SiO2, n-ZnO, n-CeO2) with a narrow size distribution (declared particle size in the 15–42 nM range), chosen on the basis of their commercial and environmental relevance. Physico-chemical characterization of both primary particles and NP suspensions in artificial sea water (ASW) was performed and lysosomal and mitochondrial parameters, oxyradical production and phagocytic activity, as well as NP uptake, were evaluated.
Results
Characterization of Primary NPs and NP Suspensions in ASW
Characterization of the primary particles was performed in order to verify the declared properties. and the results are summarized in Table 1. The actual average sizes resulted to be quite different from the declared ones, as inferred from Trasmission Electron Microscopy-TEM analysis (Table 1 and Fig. S1). In particular, a wide size distribution was found for n-ZnO. A wide range of surface areas was also found, from 14 m2/g for n-ZnO to 226 m2/g for n-SiO2. All n-oxides showed a well defined crystal structure, apart from nanosilica, which resulted substantially amorphous. Experimentally determined pore volumes were very similar for all n-oxides (0.1 ml/g), apart from n-SiO2 (0.7 ml/g). The declared high purity was confirmed for all selected nanopowders.
Table 1. Primary physical and chemical properties of selected NPs.
NP type | Crystal structure 1 | Shape 1 | Size distribution(nm) 1 | Surface area(m2/g) 2 | Pore volume(mL/g) 2 | Surface chemistry 3 | Chemical composition 1 | Purity (%) 4 |
TiO2 | Anatase/Rutile | Irregular | 15–60 | 61 | 0.1 | uncoated | Ti, O | >99.5 |
ZnO | Cubic/tetragonal/orthorhombic | Polyhedral | 10–2000 | 14 | 0.1 | uncoated | Zn, O | >99 |
SiO2 | Amorphous | Irregular | 5–30 | 226 | 0.7 | uncoated | Si, O | >99 |
CeO2 | Fluorite | Irregular | 5–20 | 45 | 0.1 | uncoated | Ce, O | >99 |
–by TEM, TEM-EDX, SAED.
–by BET.
–declared by the supplier.
–by ICP-OES.
The behaviour of different n-oxides in suspension in the ASW utilized for exposure experiments was investigated by Dynamic Light Scattering-DLS analysis. Table 2 summarizes the size distribution of selected NP suspensions in ASW. The actual size distribution was determined in NP suspensions in ASW at concentrations of 50 and 200 µg/ml (1 mg/l for silica, due to its intrinsic low scattering signal) after 15 min, 1 h and 24 h from sonication. All n-oxides showed a strong tendency to agglomeration, a natural process with NPs not stabilized by interparticle repulsive forces, giving size distributions from 18 (n-SiO2) to 126 (n-TiO2) times their average primary particle size, even at the lowest examined concentration. Although such agglomerates showed increases in size within the first hour from sonication, they should be considered quite stable, taking into account that an high energy dispersion procedure (probe sonication at 100 W) was applied in order to disperse them in the testing medium.
Table 2. Average size distributions of selected NP suspensions in ASW at different times after sonication, as determined by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS).
NP type | Concentration in ASW | Average size distribution (± Standard Deviation) with time (nm) | ||
After 15 min | After 1 h | After 24 h | ||
TiO2 | 200 µg/ml | 4195 (±1433) | 5514 (±4199) | 5846 (±4568) |
50 µg/ml | 2659 (±1957) | 3982 (±3361) | 4440 (±3765) | |
ZnO | 200 µg/ml | 2852 (±1550) | 3765 (±2337) | 4056 (±2193) |
50 µg/ml | 2193 (±1525) | 3036 (±2332) | 3467 (±2547) | |
CeO2 | 200 µg/ml | 2665 (±1425) | 4872 (±4039) | 5034 (±4479) |
50 µg/ml | 1906 (±1140) | 2919 (±2086) | 3438 (±3118) | |
SiO2 | 1 mg/ml | 178 (±105) | 180 (±98) | 208 (±103) |
Effects on Hemocyte Lysosomal Membrane Stability, Lysozyme Release and Phagocytosis
The effects of different n-oxides on Mytilus immune cells were evaluated using a battery of assays, utilizing different exposure times (from 30 min to 4 h) and conditions optimized for each assay to avoid NP interference. No significant changes in hemocyte viability were observed in the different experimental conditions (data not shown).
Lysosomal membrane stability (LMS), lysozyme release and phagocytic activity were evaluated in hemocytes incubated with different concentrations of n-TiO2, n-SiO2, n-ZnO, n-CeO2 (1, 5 and 10 µg/ml) and the results are reported in Fig. 1. Hemocyte incubation for 30 min with all n-oxides affected hemocyte LMS. As shown in Fig. 1A, a clear dose-dependent decrease was induced by n-ZnO at all the concentrations tested (–46% with respect to control values at 10 µg/ml; p≤0.01). N-TiO2 induced lysosomal destabilization at 5 and 10 µg/ml (–18 and −39%, respectively; p≤0.05), whereas n-SiO2 and n-CeO2 were effective only at the highest concentration tested (−32 and −36%, respectively; p≤0.05 and p≤0.01).
N-TiO2 stimulated lysozyme release at both 5 and 10 µg/ml (up to four-fold increase with respect to controls at the highest concentration tested; p≤0.01), whereas both n-ZnO and n-CeO2 were ineffective (Fig. 1B). On the other hand, n-SiO2 induced a decrease in extracellular lysozyme activity at higher concentrations (about −50% with respect to controls; p≤0.05).
Both n-TiO2 and n-ZnO significantly increased phagocytosis of Neutral Red-conjugated zymosan particles at the lowest concentration tested (about +30% with respect to controls; p≤0.01), whereas higher concentrations induced a dramatic decrease in phagocytic activity (−50%; p≤0.01) (Fig. 1C). N-SiO2 did not affect phagocytosis, except for a small increase (+18%; p≤0.01) at 5 µg/ml. On the other hand, n-CeO2 inhibited phagocytosis at all the concentrations tested (about −35% with respect to controls; p≤0.01).
Effects on Oxyradical and Nitric Oxide Production
Different n-oxides stimulated total extracellular oxyradical (or reactive oxygen species-ROS) production, evaluated as cyt c reduction (Fig. 2A). The effect of n-ZnO was significant at lower concentrations, and maximal at 1 µg/ml (p≤0.01). N-SiO2 induced a dose-dependent rise in ROS production at all the concentrations tested (p≤0.01). Smaller effects were observed with both n-TiO2 and n-CeO2, that were significant at 5 and 10 µg/ml (p≤0.01) When extracellular superoxide (O2 -) was evaluated as SOD-inhibitable ROS production, n-SiO2, n-TiO2 and n-CeO2 induced significant increases at both 5 and 10 µg/ml (p≤0.01), with n-SiO2 showing the strongest effect at the highest concentration, whereas n-ZnO was ineffective (Fig. 2B).
Nitric oxide-NO production was evaluated as nitrite accumulation in hemocytes incubated with n-oxides for different periods of time (from 1 to 4 h) (Fig. 3). Average NO production by control hemocytes was about 0.12±0.02 nmoles nitrite/mg protein throughout the experimental period. With n-TiO2, the lowest concentration was ineffective, whereas at higher concentrations a time-dependent increase in NO production was observed, with 5 µg/ml producing the strongest effects (p≤0.05) (Fig. 3A). For n-ZnO, an inverse relationship between particle concentration and nitrite accumulation was observed (Fig. 3B). In particular, 1 µg/ml n-ZnO induced the largest rise in NO production between 1 and 3 h incubation (p≤0.05). For both n-SiO2 and n-CeO2, maximal nitrite accumulation was observed with the highest concentration at shorter times of incubation, whereas lower concentrations were effective at longer incubation times (p≤0.05) (Fig. 3C and 3D).
Effects on Mitochondria
The effects of hemocyte incubation with different n-oxides (45 min, 10 µg/ml) on mitochondrial parameters were evaluated by Flow Cytometry utilizing specific fluorescent dyes for active mitochondria (MitoTracker Green), mitochondrial membrane potential Δψm (Tetramethylrhodamine, ethyl-ester perchlorate -TMRE) and Cardiolipin oxidation in the inner mitochondrial membrane (10-nonyl-acridine orange-NAO), and the results are reported in Fig. 4. The results indicate that n-ZnO induced a significant decrease in mitochondrial mass/number (−36% with respect to controls, p≤0.05) and membrane potential ΔΨ (−40%, p≤0.05), as well as an increase in cardiolipin oxidation (−51%, p≤0.05). On the other hand, the other types of n-oxides did not affect mitochondrial parameters.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
Observations on n-TiO2 and n-ZnO suspensions in ASW at the highest concentration utilized in exposure experiments (10 µg/ml) and their possible uptake by mussel hemocytes at different times of exposure (30 and 60 min) were carried out by TEM, and representative images are reported in Figs. 5 and 6. As shown in Fig. 5A, in the n-TiO2 suspension agglomerates of different sizes (500 nm-1 µm) were observed. Control hemocytes are shown in Fig. 5B and hemocytes incubated with n-TiO2 in Figs. 5C and 5D. Exposure to n-TiO2 did not apparently affect the hemocyte morphology. n-TiO2 agglomerates of 200–250 nm size were observed within endosomes at 30 min incubation (Fig. 5C). At 60 min, nanosized particles were observed within the nucleus (Fig. 5D).
In Fig. 6 are reported TEM images of n-ZnO suspensions, indicating the presence of agglomerates of hundreds nm (Fig. 6A). In hemocytes exposed to n-ZnO, nanosized ZnO particles were found within endosomes at 30 min incubation (Fig. 6B). Moreover, at 60 min of exposure, apoptotic cells could be observed (Fig. 6C).
Discussion
Characterization of Different n-oxides
Primary particles revealed a wide range of average size distributions and surface areas, comparable pore volumes, except for n-SiO2, and similar purity for different types of n-oxides (Table 1). Moreover, behavior of n-oxide suspensions in ASW at different concentrations and times after sonication was investigated by DLS analysis, indicating a general strong tendency to formation of stable agglomerates of micrometric size for all n-oxides, except for n-SiO2 (Table 2).
Although the size obtained by DLS is usually greater than that measured by other techniques, like TEM, BET, etc., during DLS measurements there is a tendency of particles to aggregate in the aqueous state, so this method gives the sizes of clustered particles rather than individual particles. Moreover, NP concentrations higher than those utilized in exposure experiments were utilized for DLS analysis, due to intrinsic low scattering signal. However, the DLS system also affords the option of considering the average hydrodynamic diameter of the particles in terms of number and under conditions that more closely resemble the exposure conditions, so it can provide an idea of the particle suspension stability with respect to time and medium [21]. When suspensions of n-TiO2 or n-ZnO at concentrations utilized in cell exposure experiments (10 µg/ml in ASW) were analysed by TEM, agglomerates of smaller size (hundreds nm), were observed (Fig. 5 and 6). The observed formation of NP agglomerates in ASW cannot of course be predictive of the behaviour of NPs in natural waters, in particular in coastal and estuarine waters that represent the natural environment of mussels, and that are subjected to fluctuations in salinity and concentrations of organic substances.
Effects of Different n-oxides on Hemocyte Parameters
In our experimental conditions, suspensions of all the n-oxides tested significantly affected functional parameters of Mytilus hemocytes, with distinct effects or to a different extent for different endpoints. The observed responses were comparable with those induced by bacterial signals, hormones, or other contaminants [15], [18].
All n-oxides induced moderate but significant decreases in lysosomal membrane stability (LMS), a sensitive parameter of cellular stress in bivalves, with ZnO>TiO2 = SiO2>CeO2. The effect was apparently unrelated to the primary particle size or to the size of agglomerates of NP suspensions in ASW. Only n-TiO2 also induced a significant increase in lysozyme release at higher concentrations. Stimulation of total extracellular ROS production was also observed, with ZnO>SiO2>TiO2 = CeO2. With n-ZnO an inverse relationship between concentration and oxyradical production was observed, whereas other n-oxides induced a dose-dependent effect. Moreover, when the SOD-inhibitable ROS production was determined, the effects of all n-oxides, except for n-ZnO, were mainly due to production of O2 −, with SiO2>TiO2 = CeO2. All n-oxides also induced nitrite accumulation, indicating stimulation of NO production, with distinct concentration- and time-dependent effects depending on the NP type. Both n-TiO2 and n-ZnO showed a biphasic effect on phagocytosis of NR-conjugated zymosan particles, with stimulation at the lowest concentration and inhibition at higher concentrations. A small increase in phagocytic activity was also observed with n-SiO2, that was however ineffective at higher concentrations. On the other hand, n-CeO2 inhibited phagocytosis at all the concentrations tested. Since phagocytosis is commonly used as a proxy for immunocompetence in bivalves [22], data on hemocyte phagocytic activity may reflect the overall impact of NPs on the immune function. However, the possibility that, at higher concentrations, n-TiO2 and n-ZnO agglomerates may specifically compete with zymosan particles for phagocytosis by the hemocytes must be considered.
With regards to the effects of each n-oxide type on hemocyte functional parameters, n-SiO2 scarcely affected LMS and phagocytosis in comparison with other n-oxides, whereas it was a powerful inducer of ROS (O2 − in particular) and NO production, indicating inflammatory processes. Such an effect may be due to stronger interactions with cellular membranes of NPs with larger surface area and pore volume, as well as to formation of smaller agglomerates in ASW (see Tables 1 and 2).
The present work reports the first data on the cellular effects of n-CeO2 in aquatic organisms. N-CeO2 has been developed as a fuel additive, and it is likely to be released into waste waters and the atmosphere and thus be distributed widely in the aquatic environment [23]. Ecotoxicity of n-CeO2 in aquatic organisms is generally low (EC50 in the mg/l range from bacteria to fish) ([24] and reference quoted therein). In mammalian cells, the toxicity of n-CeO2 is still controversial, with often conflicting results depending on the experimental model, especially regarding the oxidant/antioxidant effect [23]. Interactions with plasma membranes may involve an oxidative response due to reduction of Ce(IV) to Ce(II). On the other hand, n-CeO2 is considered a unique nanomaterial because it exhibits anti-inflammatory properties, potentially acting as a ROS scavenger with superoxide dismutase-like activity [25]. However, such as an effect may occur in the cytosol and mitochondria, whereas toxicity seems to be associated with cellular uptake and localization in the acidic lysosomal matrix, especially in phagocytic cells [25], [26]. This is highly important as some nanomaterials may display different behavior and exert either a beneficial (antioxidant) or toxic (oxidant) effect, depending not only on particle charge in different experimental media [24] but also on the pH of the subcellular compartment where they localize [25]. Our results show in mussel hemocytes that n-CeO2 induced ROS and NO production, at the same time inhibiting the phagocytic activity, this indicating that n-CeO2 may have inflammatory and/or immunosuppressive effects. The effects of nanoceria with mussel cells, in terms of subcellular localisation and pro-oxidant/antioxidant effects, require further investigation.
N-ZnO showed the strongest effects on LMS. In bivalve hemocytes, reduction of lysosomal stability is linked with impaired cellular immunity [8], [27]. At the lowest concentration tested, when a small decrease in LMS was observed, ROS and NO production, as well as phagocytic activity, were increased, indicating immunostimulation. On the other hand, at increasing concentrations, stronger lysosomal destabilization was associated with inhibition of phagocytosis and smaller, if any, ROS/NO production. Moreover, at the highest concentration, FC analysis revealed specific effects on mitochondria, such as decreases in mitochondrial mass/number and membrane potential, as previously observed in hemocytes treated with carbon black NPs [19]. N-ZnO also induced mitochondrial cardiolipin oxidation; moreover, increases in Annexin V binding at the plasma membrane was observed (data not shown). Overall, the results indicate that n-ZnO can induce pre-apoptotic processes in mussel hemocytes, as confirmed by the presence of apoptotic cells visualized by TEM. The toxicity of n-ZnO on marine organisms was shown to be influenced significantly by the release of Zn2+ ions [28], [29]. Actually, the effects of higher concentrations of n-ZnO on immune parameters of Mytilus hemocytes are comparable with those elicited by ZnCl2 [30], [31]. Moreover, the effects of n-ZnO (lysosomal destabilization, mitochondrial injury) were similar to those observed in mammalian cells, including macrophages [32], [33]. This toxicity was directly related not only to particle dissolution and release of toxic Zn2+ in the cell culture medium, but also to particle uptake and Zn2+ dissolution within the acidic endosomal/lysosomal compartments. In order to get a first insight into the possible uptake and intracellular localization of n-oxides in mussel hemocytes, TEM observations were performed in cells exposed to n-ZnO. Endosomal localization of ZnO nanosized particles was observed in mussel hemocytes, supporting this hypothesis.
TiO2 is the most widely produced nanomaterial [34], and it may reach environmental concentrations to pose a significant threat to aquatic ecosystems. In vivo exposure to n-TiO2 in the low mg/l range showed adverse effects on different aquatic organisms [35], [36], [37]. Our in vitro data show that, in the same concentration range, n-TiO2 significantly affected all the parameters measured in mussel hemocytes. At the lowest concentration tested, n-TiO2 stimulated the phagocytic activity without significantly affecting other endpoints; at increasing concentrations, increased lysosomal destabilization, lysozyme release, oxidative burst and NO production were associated with a decrease in phagocytosis. TEM analysis indicated the presence of TiO2 agglomerates in endocytic vacuoles at 30 min (but also at 15 min, data not shown); at longer times of incubation nanosized material was observed within the nuclear compartment.
With regards to the in vitro effects of n-TiO2 and n-SiO2 on mussel hemocytes, the result largely confirm and extend previous observations in the same experimental conditions [20]. With respect to the previous work, discrepancies were in fact observed only for the effects of n-TiO2 on LMS and of n-SiO2 on lysozyme release. Such differences may be partly due to biological factors; this could explain the stronger effects of n-TiO2 on LMS observed in the present work. On the other hand, distinct effects on lysozyme release were observed for n-SiO2. However, in the present work, a nanosilica with similar size and physico-chemical declared properties, but obtained from a different source, was utilized. Differences in the properties of the two types of nanosilica could also partially explain their distinct effects on different biological endpoints. Overall, the results strongly support the view that in invertebrate hemocytes, the evaluation of a single functional parameter cannot be considered as fully representative of immunocompetence. Our data strongly support the view that the application of a battery of functional assays is needed to evaluate the overall impact of environmental stressors, including NP exposure, on bivalve immune function [22].
Taken together, the results indicate that the immunomodulatory effects of different n-oxides on mussel hemocytes mainly depend not only on the concentration, but also on particle chemistry and behaviour in ASW. Although the results of in vitro experiments are not necessarily predictive of in vivo effects, exposure to different types on NPs in both freshwater and marine bivalves has been shown to both affect hemocyte parameters and to induce stress responses in different tissues, indicating adverse effects at the organism level [35], [38]. Moreover, exposure to n-TiO2 in the low µg/l range confirm the effects of n-TiO2 on Mytilus immune parameters in vivo (Canesi et al., manuscript in preparation).
Overall, the results obtained in Mytilus hemocytes represent the most extensive data so far available on the effects of NPs in the cells of aquatic organisms, and indicate that hemocytes can represent a sensitive in vitro model for the rapid screening of the cellular effects of different NPs. Moreover, the results give an insight into the possible mechanisms of action of different NP types, their interactions with different cellular compartments and effects on the innate immune response. These data add information on the potential impact of commercial NPs in aquatic organisms and can provide a basis for future experimental work related to designing safer nanomaterials.
Materials and Methods
NP Characterization
Nanosized Titanium Dioxide P25 (declared size: 21 nm) was provided from Degussa Evonik (Essen, Germany), with a declared purity of >99.5%. Nanosized silica (declared size: 20 nm) and nanosized zinc oxide (declared size: 42 nm) were kindly provided from Kristoph Klein (European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, I). Nanosized Cerium oxide (declared size: 15–30 nm) was kindly provided by Prof. Enrico Bergamaschi (University of Parma, I).
These n-oxides were characterized by a combination of analytical techniques. Mean average size, shape and crystal structure of primary particles were determined by Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) analysis on a Jeol (Tokyo, Japan) 3010 transmission electron microscope operating at 300 kV. TEM images of different n-oxides are shown in Fig. S1. Surface area and pore volume were obtained by nitrogen adsorption on a Micrometrics ASAP2000 Accelerated Surface Area and Porosimetry System at an adsorption temperature of −196°C, after pretreating the sample under high vacuum at 300°C for 2 h [39]. Table 1 summarizes the results obtained for primary particle characterization.
Stock suspensions of investigated NPs were freshly prepared for DLS analysis in artificial sea water (ASW) (36‰ salinity) prepared according to the ASTM E 724–98 protocol [40], and filtered through a 0.45 µm Teflon® filter. NP suspensions were prepared at a concentration of 0.05–1 mg/ml, then sonicated for 15 min at 100 W and 50% on/off cycle with a UP200S Hielscher Ultrasonic Technology (Teltow, Germany) in an ice/water bath. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analysis was performed with a Submicron Particle Sizer Nicomp 370 DLS (Santa Barbara, CA, USA), equipped with a 5 mW He-Ne laser, 632.8 nm laser diode and a photodiode detector set at 90°. Table 2 summarizes the size distribution of selected NP suspensions in ASW.
Animals, hemolymph Collection and Hemocyte Treatment
Mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam.) 4–5 cm long, obtained from a mussel farm at Arborea (OR, Italy) were kept for 1–3 days in static tanks containing 36 ‰ salinity ASW, 1 l/mussel, at 16°C. Sea water was changed daily. Hemolymph was extracted from the posterior adductor muscle sinus, using a sterile 1 ml syringe with a 18 G1/2″ needle. Hemolymph collection and hemocyte treatments were carried out as previously described [19]. For each sample, hemolymph from 8–10 individuals was filtered through a sterile gauze and pooled in 50 ml Falcon tubes at 4°C. Stock suspensions of NPs in ASW (10 µg/ml) were prepared by sonication as for DLS analysis and immediately added to the samples in order to reach the desired concentrations. Hemocyte suspensions or hemocyte monolayers, depending on the endpoint measured, were incubated at 16°C with different concentrations of NP suspensions (1, 5, 10 µg/ml) for different periods of time (from 30 min to 4 hrs), as indicated in each experiment. Different times of incubation with NP suspensions were utilised for measuring each endpoint in order to optimise the in vitro response of the hemocyte to different stimuli as previously described [20]. Untreated hemocyte samples in ASW were run in parallel. All incubations were carried out at at 16°C utilising a cell number of about 1–2·106 cells/ml (for determination of cell number, see the Flow Cytometry section). All experiments were performed at least 4 times in triplicate.
Electron Microscopy
Hemocyte monolayers were seeded on glass chamber slides (Lab-Tek, Nunc, 177380) and treated with suspensions of n-TiO2 or n-ZnO in ASW (10 µg/ml) for different times (30 and 60 minutes) at 16°C. After incubation, cells were washed out in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer in ASW. Hemocytes were then fixed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer in ASW containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde, for 30 minutes at room temperature. The cells were postfixed in osmium tetroxide for 10 minutes and 1% uranyl acetate for 1 hour. Subsequently, samples were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series and embedded in resin (Poly-Bed; Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA) overnight at 42°C and 2 days at 60°C. Ultrathin sections (50 nm) were cut parallel to the substrate and observed with G2 Tecnai bio-twin electron microscope (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) without additional staining. Digital images were taken with Megaview 3 CCD camera and iTEM software and processed with Adobe Photoshop CS2.
Aliquots (5–10 µl) of NP suspensions (n-TiO2 and n-ZnO 10 µg/ml ASW) were deposited on formvar and carbon-coated copper grids and allowed to settle for approximately 10 minutes. Grids were blotted dry to remove the excess and then covered with a small drop of stain (2% uranyl acetate) for 5 minutes. Grids were then blotted dry and immediately viewed at the electron microscope.
Lysosomal Membrane Stability and Lysosomal Enzyme Release
Lysosomal membrane stability (LMS) in control hemocytes and hemocytes pre-incubated for 30 min with different concentrations of n-oxides (1,5 and 10 µg/ml) was evaluated by the Neutral Red Retention time assay as previously described [19] according to [41]. Lysosomal enzyme release was evaluated by measuring lysozyme activity in the extracellular medium as previously described [19] according to [42]. Lysozyme activity in aliquots of serum of control hemocytes and hemocytes incubated with NPs for 30 min was determined spectrophotometrically at 450 nm utilising Micrococcus lysodeikticus.
Phagocytosis Assay
Phagocytosis of neutral red-stained zymosan by hemocyte monolayers was used to assess the phagocytic ability of hemocytes [43]. Neutral red-stained zymosan in 0.05 M Tris–HCl buffer (TBS), pH 7.8, containing 2% NaCl was added to each monolayer at a concentration of about 1∶30 hemocytes:zymosan in the presence or absence of different n-oxides (1,5 and 10 µg/ml), and allowed to incubate for 60 min. Monolayers were then washed three times with TBS, fixed with Baker’s formol calcium (4%, v/v, formaldehyde, 2% NaCl, 1% calcium acetate) for 30 min and mounted in Kaiser’s medium for microscopical examination with a Vanox optical microscope. For each slide, the percentage of phagocytic hemocytes was calculated from a minimum of 200 cells.
Extracellular Oxyradical Production and Nitrite Accumulation
Extracellular generation of superoxide by mussel hemocytes was measured by the reduction of cytochrome c [43]. Hemolymph was extracted into an equal volume of TBS (0.05 M Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.6, containing 2% NaCl). Aliquots (500 µl) of hemocyte suspension in triplicate were incubated with 500 µl of cytochrome c solution (75 µM ferricytochrome c in TBS), in the presence and absence of NPs (1, 5, 10 µg/ml) for 30 min. In a parallel set of samples, superoxide dismutase-SOD (300 Units/ml) was included to allow specific evaluation of superoxide (O2 −) generation. Cytochrome c in TBS was used as a blank. Samples were read at 550 nm at different times (0 and 30 min) and the results expressed as changes in OD per mg protein.
Nitric oxide (NO) production by mussel hemocytes was evaluated as described previously [19] by the Griess reaction, which quantifies the nitrite (NO2 −) content of supernatants. Aliquots of hemocyte suspensions (1.5 ml) were incubated at 16°C with NP suspensions for 0–4 h. Every 60 min, samples were immediately frozen and stored at −80°C until use. Before analysis, samples were thawed and centrifuged (12,000 g for 30 min at 4°C), and the supernatants were analyzed for NO2 − content. Aliquots (200 µl) in triplicate were incubated for 10 min in the dark with 200 µl of 1% (wt/v) sulphanilamide in 5% H3PO4 and 200 µl of 0.1% (wt/v) N-(1-naphthy)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride. Samples were read at 540 nm, and the molar concentration of NO2 − in the sample was calculated from standard curves generated using known concentrations of sodium nitrite.
Flow Cytometry
Aliquots (50 µl) from the fresh hemocyte suspensions (obtained from 8–10 individuals) were added to 250 µl of PBS-NaCl. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScalibur, BD Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). Data acquisition and analysis were performed with BD CellQuest software using the parameters of relative size (FSC) and granularity (SSC). Counting beads (Dako Cytocount™ ) were added in a volume of 50 µl to each tube, to allow for total hemocyte count (THC). Five gates were set up to identify the three cell sub-populations, as well as spermatozoa, cell debris, and aggregates, that were not considered for further analysis.
Aliquots of hemolymph (each containing about 1–2·106 cells/ml) were incubated with different n-oxides (10 µg/ml) for 45 min at 16°C and analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA, USA). Samples were then stained with different fluorescent probes for FC analysis. All incubations were carried out at 16°C. Hemocyte viability : aliquots of 150 µl hemolymph were incubated with propidium iodide (PI, final concentration 20 µg/ml) for 10 min and fluorescence was measured at 550–600 nm. No significant changes in hemocyte viability were observed in the different experimental conditions (data not shown).
Determination of mass/number of mitochondria: hemocytes were incubated with the mitochondrial selective dye Mito Tracker Green FM-MT (50 nM). After incubation for 30 min cells were analysed by FC on FL1 (excitation wavelength 488 nm; emission wavelength: 516 nm) as previously described [19].
Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP or Δψm) was evaluated by the fluorescent dye TMRE (Tetramethylrhodamine, ethyl ester perchlorate), as previously described [19]. Hemocytes were incubated with 40 nM TMRE for 10 min before FC analysis using an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 580 nm.
Mitochondrial cardiolipin (CL) oxidation was evaluated by the CL sensitive probe, 10-nonyl-acridine orange (NAO) [44]. After exposure to n-oxides, cells were collected by centrifugation, washed in PBS-NaCl buffer, resuspended in the same buffer containing 100 nM NAO and incubated for 30 min. FL1 fluorescence was analysed using an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 519 nm. To evaluate changes in fluorescence intensity (FI) values, we considered the original input on untreated cells as control (100%). Sample acquisition and analyses were performed by a FACSCalibur flow cytometer equipped with CellQuest™ software.
Statistical Analysis
Data are the mean ± SD of at least 4 independent experiments in triplicate. Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test with significance at P≤0.05.
Supporting Information
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: Funding was provided by the Italian Ministry of Research (PRIN2009) prot. 2009FHHP2W_002, http://prin.miur.it, and Fondi Ateneo 2008, University of Genoa, http://www.unige.it. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, et al. Nanomaterials in the environment: fate, bioavailability and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008;27:1825–1851. doi: 10.1897/08-090.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gottschalk F, Nowack B. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J Environ Monit. 2011;13:1145–1155. doi: 10.1039/c0em00547a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blaise C, Gagné F, Férard JF, Eullaffroy P. Ecotoxicity of selected nano-materials to aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol. 2008;223:591–598. doi: 10.1002/tox.20402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scown TM, van Aerle R, Tyler CR. Review: Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment? Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010;40:653–70. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2010.494174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Handy RD, Cornelis G, Fernandes T, Tsyusko O, Decho A, et al. Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: Practical experiences and recommendations from the bench. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011;31:15–31. doi: 10.1002/etc.706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Crane M, Handy R, Garrod J, Owen R. Ecotoxicity tests methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology. 2008;5:421–437. doi: 10.1007/s10646-008-0215-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baun A, Hartmann NB, Grieger K, Kisk KO. Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: a brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology. 2008;17:387–395. doi: 10.1007/s10646-008-0208-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moore MN. Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment? Environ Int. 2006;32:967–976. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Borm PJ, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, et al. The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC. BMC Particle Fibre Toxicol. 2006;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-3-11. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-3-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zolnik BS, Gonzales-Fernandez A, Sadrieh N, Dobrovolskaia MA. Minireview: nanoparticles and the immune system. Endocrinology. 2010;151:458–465. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dwivedi PD, Misra A, Shanker R, Das M. Are nanomaterials a threat to the immune system? Nanotoxicology. 2009;3:19–26. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pfaller T, Colognato R, Neilssen I, Favilli F, Casals E, et al. The suitability of different cellular in vitro immunoxicity and genotoxiciy models for the analysis of nanoparticle-induced events. Nanotoxicology. 2010;4:52–72. doi: 10.3109/17435390903374001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oostingh GJ, Casals E, Italiani P, Colognato R, Stritzinger R, et al. Problems and challenges in the development and validation of human cell-based assays to determine nanoparticle-induced immunomodulatory effects. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2011;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-8-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Soderhall K. (Ed.) Invertebrate immunity. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, Landes Bioscience, N.Y., USA Vol. 2010. 708. [PubMed]
- 15.Canesi L, Ciacci C, Fabbri R, Marcomini A, Pojana G, et al. Mar Environ Res Jun 28. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2011.06.005 [Epub ahead of print]; 2011. Bivalve molluscs as an unique target group for nanoparticle toxicity. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Canesi L, Gavioli M, Pruzzo C, Gallo G. Bacteria–hemocyte interactions and phagocytosis in marine bivalves. Microsc Res Technol. 2002;57:469–476. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.García-García E, Prado-Alvarez M, Novoa B, Figueras A, Rosales C. Immune responses of mussel hemocyte subpopulations are differentially regulated by enzymes of the PI 3-K, PKC, and ERK kinase families. Dev Comp Immunol. 2008;32:637–653. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2007.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Canesi L, Betti M, Ciacci C, Lorusso LC, Pruzzo C, et al. Cell signaling in the immune response of mussel hemocytes. Invertebrate Survival Journal. 2006;3:40–49. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Canesi L, Ciacci C, Betti M, Fabbri R, Canonico B, et al. Immunotoxicity of carbon black nanoparticles to blue mussel hemocytes. Environ Int. 2008;34:1114–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Canesi L, Ciacci C, Vallotto D, Gallo G, Marcomini A, et al. In vitro effects of suspensions of selected nanoparticles (C60 fullerene, TiO2, SiO2) on Mytilus hemocytes. Aquat Toxicol. 2010;96:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dhawan A, Sharma V. Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398:589–605. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3996-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ellis RP, Parry H, Spicer JI, Hutchinson TH, Pipe RK, et al. Immunological function in marine invertebrates: responses to environmental perturbation. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011;30:1209–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2011.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cassee FR, van Balen EC, Singh C, Green D, Muijser H, et al. Exposure, health and ecological effects review of engineered nanoscale cerium and cerium oxide associated with its use as a fuel additive. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2011;41:213–229. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2010.529105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rodea-Palomares I, Boltes K, Fernández-Piñas F, Leganés F, García-Calvo E, et al. Physicochemical characterization and ecotoxicological assessment of CeO2 nanoparticles using two aquatic microorganisms. Toxicol Sci. 2011;119:135–145. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Asati A, Santra S, Kaittanis C, Perez JM. Surface-charge-dependent cell localization and cytotoxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010;4:5321–5331. doi: 10.1021/nn100816s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Singh S, Kumar A, Karakoti A, Seal S, Self WT. Unveiling the mechanism of uptake and sub-cellular distribution of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Mol Biosyst. 2010;6:1813–1820. doi: 10.1039/c0mb00014k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moore MN, Readman JAJ, Lowe DM, Frickers PE, Beesley A. Lysosomal cytotoxicity of carbon nanoparticles in cells of the molluscan immune system: an in vitro study. Nanotoxicology. 2009;3:40–45. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Miller RJ, Lenihan HS, Muller EB, Tseng N, Hanna SK, et al. Impacts of metal oxide nanoparticles on marine phytoplankton. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:7329–7334. doi: 10.1021/es100247x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wong SW, Leung PT, Djurisić AB, Leung KM. Toxicities of nano zinc oxide to five marine organisms: influences of aggregate size and ion solubility. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;396:609–618. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-3249-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sauvé S, Brousseau P, Pellerin J, Morin Y, Senécal L, et al. Phagocytic activity of marine and freshwater bivalves: in vitro exposure of hemocytes to metals (Ag, Cd, Hg and Zn). Aquat Toxicol. 2002;58:189–200. doi: 10.1016/s0166-445x(01)00232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kaloyianni M, Ragia V, Tzeranaki I, Dailianis S. The influence of Zn on signaling pathways and attachment of Mytilus galloprovincialis haemocytes to extracellular matrix proteins. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006;144:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, Mädler L, Gilbert B, et al. Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. ACS Nano. 2008;2:2121–2134. doi: 10.1021/nn800511k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Müller KH, Kulkarni J, Motskin M, Goode A, Winship P, et al. pH-dependent toxicity of high aspect ratio ZnO nanowires in macrophages due to intracellular dissolution. ACS Nano. 2010;4:6767–6779. doi: 10.1021/nn101192z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Robichaud CO, Uyar AE, Darby MR, Zucker LG, Wiesner MR. Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:4227–4233. doi: 10.1021/es8032549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Canesi L, Fabbri R, Gallo G, Vallotto D, Marcomini A, et al. Biomarkers in Mytilus galloprovincialis exposed to suspensions of selected nanoparticles (Nano carbon black, C60 fullerene, Nano-TiO2, Nano-SiO2). Aquat Toxicol. 2010b;100:168–77. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dabrunz A, Duester L, Prasse C, Seitz F, Rosenfeldt R, et al. Biological surface coating and molting inhibition as mechanisms of TiO2 nanoparticle toxicity in Daphnia magna. PlosOne. 2011;e20112 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Miller RJ, Bennet S, Keller AA, Pease S, Lenihan HS. TiO2 Nanoparticles are phototoxic to marine phytoplankton. PlosOne. 2012;e30321 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gagnè F, Auclair J, Turcotte P, Fournier M, Gagnon C, et al. Ecotoxicity of CdTe quantum dots to freshwater mussel: impacts on immune system, oxidative stress and genotoxicity. Aquat Toxicol. 2008;86:333–340. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc. 1938;60:309–319. [Google Scholar]
- 40.ASTM International. Standard guide for conducting static acute toxicity tests starting with embryos of four species of saltwater bivalve molluscs E. 2004;724–798 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lowe DM, Fossato VU, Depledge MH. Contaminant-induced lysosomal membrane damage in blood cells of mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis from the Venice Lagoon: an in vitro study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1995;129:189–196. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chu FLE, La Peyre JF. Effect of environmental factors and parasitism on hemolymph lysozyme and protein of American oysters (Crassostrea virginica). J Invert Pathol. 1989;54:224–232. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pipe R, Coles JA, Farley SR. Assays for measuring immune response in the mussel Mytilus edulis. In: Stolen J, Fletcher TC, Smith SA, Zelikoff JT, Kaattari SL, Anderson RS, editors. Techniques in fish immunology: fish immunology technical communications, Immunological and pathological techniques of aquatic invertebrates, vol. 4, SOS publications, Fair Haven NJ, 1995;93–100 [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ferry S, Degli Esposti M, Ndebele K, Philimon P, Knight D, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand alters mitochondrial membrane lipids. Cancer Research. 2005;65:8286–8297. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.