Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Medical Microbiology
. 2012 Feb;61(Pt 2):191–197. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.030858-0

Variability of trinucleotide tandem repeats in the MgPa operon and its repetitive chromosomal elements in Mycoplasma genitalium

Liang Ma 1,†,, Jørgen S Jensen 2, Miriam Mancuso 1, Ryoichi Hamasuna 3, Qiuyao Jia 1, Chris L McGowin 1, David H Martin 1
PMCID: PMC3352159  PMID: 21997874

Abstract

Mycoplasma genitalium, a human pathogen associated with sexually transmitted diseases, is unique in that it has the smallest genome of any known free-living organism. Despite its small genome, 4.7 % of the total genomic sequence is devoted to making the MgPa adhesin operon (containing the MG190, MG191 and MG192 genes) and its repetitive chromosomal sequences (known as MgPars). The goals of this study were to investigate the location, organization and variability of trinucleotide tandem repeats (TTRs) in the MgPa operon and MgPars and to explore the possible mechanisms and role of TTR variations. By analysing the complete MgPa operon and complete or partial MgPar sequences in a collection of 15 geographically diverse clinical strains of M. genitalium, TTR sequences were identified in four regions in MG191, one region in MG192, and two or three regions in each of all nine MgPars except for MgPar 3. These TTRs were variable not only in the repeat copy number but also in the repeat unit sequence among or within strains. The key mechanisms for the TTR variations likely include recombination between MgPa and MgPars, and slipped-strand mispairing. TTR variation may represent a mechanism to maximize the variation of the MgPa operon, which is complementary to genetic variation involving segmental recombination between MgPa and MgPars, thus enhancing the organism’s ability to adhere to and colonize host cells as well as evasion of the host immune system.

Introduction

Tandem DNA repeat sequences are found in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic genomes. Expansion and contraction of repeats may alter gene function or affect local structure of the DNA molecule or the encoded proteins (Charlesworth et al., 1994; Htun & Dahlberg, 1989; Richard et al., 2008). In humans a particular class of tandem DNA repeats, called trinucleotide tandem repeats (TTRs), has been shown to be associated with various neurodegenerative disorders, known as triplet repeat expansion diseases (Di Prospero & Fischbeck, 2005). In some microbes variation in intragenic repeat number provides the functional diversity of cell-surface antigens that allows rapid adaptation to the environment and avoidance of the host immune system (van Belkum et al., 1998; Verstrepen et al., 2005). Since these repeats are often hypervariable between individuals of the same species, they have been widely used for genome mapping and molecular typing (Ma et al., 2008; van Belkum et al., 1998).

Mycoplasma genitalium, a sexually transmitted pathogen associated with genital tract diseases (Jensen, 2006), has the smallest genome of any known free-living micro-organism (Fraser et al., 1995; Glass et al., 2006). Despite its small genome, 4.7 % of the total genomic sequence is devoted to making the MgPa adhesin operon and its repetitive sequences (Fraser et al., 1995). These repetitive sequences, known as MgPars, are not arranged in tandem but dispersed around the genome in nine loci (Fraser et al., 1995; Iverson-Cabral et al., 2006, 2007; Jensen, 2006; Ma et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 1995). We and others have demonstrated that the MgPars serve as the donor sequences that can recombine into two of the three genes encoded by the MgPa operon, MG191 (mgpB) and MG192 (mgpC) (Iverson-Cabral et al., 2006, 2007; Jensen, 2006; Ma et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 1995). Both MgpB and MgpC proteins are antigenic and can elicit serum antibody responses in M. genitalium patients and experimentally inoculated animals (Clausen et al., 2001; Hu et al., 1987; McGowin et al., 2010; Morrison-Plummer et al., 1987; Svenstrup et al., 2006). Recombination within the minimized genome can generate extensive variation, which presumably allows the organism to evade the host immune response and to adapt to diverse host microenvironments, thus establishing persistent infection. Recently we searched the M. genitalium genome and identified short tandem repeats (1–5 bp) in 18 loci throughout the genome (Ma et al., 2008). Surprisingly, the majority of these repeats (15/18) are TTRs and eight of the 15 TTRs were located in the MgPa operon and MgPars. These observations raise questions as to the role of TTRs in the MgPa operon and what mechanisms are involved in TTR variation. In addition, current data on TTRs in the MgPa operon and MgPars are based on in vitro studies of several M. genitalium laboratory strains, including the type strain G37 (Iverson-Cabral et al., 2006, 2007; Jensen, 2006; Ma et al., 2007, 2008; Rocha & Blanchard, 2002; van Belkum et al., 1998), and in vivo studies of clinical specimens from M. genitalium-infected patients (Jensen, 2006; Ma et al., 2007). However, in all these studies, only small portions of the MgPa operon and MgPars were examined for TTRs. It is unknown if additional TTRs exist and what degree of TTR variation exists among clinical strains.

The goals of this study were to investigate the location, organization and variability of TTRs in the complete MgPa operon and MgPars in a collection of geographically diverse strains of M. genitalium, and to explore the possible mechanisms and role of TTR variations.

Methods

M. genitalium specimens.

Thirteen axenic isolates of M. genitalium (Table 1) were obtained from our previous studies (Hamasuna et al., 2007; Jensen et al., 1996; Jensen, 2009). All isolates except for M2282 were cloned by standard filtration or limiting dilution cloning procedures (Hamasuna et al., 2007; Jensen et al., 1996). These isolates were grown in modified Friis’s medium containing horse serum (Jensen et al., 1996). In addition, we used two sequential urine specimens obtained from each of two men with acute urethritis in New Orleans, Louisiana (patient nos 199 and 64), who were followed for 10 and 11 days, respectively (Hjorth et al., 2006; Ma & Martin, 2004; Ma et al., 2008). All urine specimens had been genotyped at multiple genomic loci (Hjorth et al., 2006; Ma & Martin, 2004; Ma et al., 2008). Each patient presented an identical genotype profile between the two sequential specimens, indicating that each patient was infected with only a single M. genitalium strain. Written informed consent was obtained from both patients and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center.

Table 1. Variation of TTRs in the MgPa operon among M. genitalium axenic isolates and urine specimens.
Specimen Origin Reference Repeat unit-copy no.*
MG191-C MG191-EF1 MG191-EF2 MG191-F MG192-L
G37† UK Tully et al. (1981) TCT-3 TCT-2 AGT-1 AGT-7 AGT-11
Axenic isolates
M30 UK Tully et al. (1981) TCT-3 TCT-1 AGT-2 AGT-6 AGT-7
M2282 Denmark Jensen et al. (1996) TCT-3 TCT-1 AGT-1 AGT-62, 71 AGT-7
M2288 Denmark Jensen et al. (1996) TCT-7 TCT-45 AGT-64, 81 AGT-101, 114 AGT-52, 62
M2300 Denmark Jensen et al. (1996) TCT-3 None AGT-1 AGT-52, 61 AGT-61, 81
M2321 Denmark Jensen et al. (1996) TCT-10 TCT-1 AGT-5 AGT-71, 83 TCT-113, 121
M2341 Denmark Jensen et al. (1996) TCT-7 TCT-4 AGT-1 AGT-72 TCT-7
M6257 Sweden Jensen et al. (2008) TCT-5 TCT-3 AGT-2 AGT-8 AGT-13
M6280 Sweden Jensen et al. (2008) TCT-7 TCT-8 AGT-4 AGT-7 TCT-5
M6282 Japan Hamasuna et al. (2007) TCT-6 TCT-1 AGT-1 AGT-6 AGT-7
M6283 Japan Hamasuna et al. (2007) TCT-5 TCT-2 AGT-8 AGT-6 AGT-4
M6284 Japan Hamasuna et al. (2007) TCT-3 TCT-1 AGT-1 AGT-6 AGT-7
M6285 Sweden Hamasuna et al. (2005) TCT-5 TCT-1 AGT-6 AGT-10 AGT-7
M6286 Sweden Hamasuna et al. (2005) TCT-9 TCT-1 AGT-5 AGT-6 AGT-9
Urine specimens‡
199.0 USA Ma et al. (2007) TCT-61,74 None7 AGT-47 AGT-76 AGT-610
199.1 USA Ma et al. (2007) TCT-62,73 None7 AGT-47 AGT-61, 75 AGT-618
64.0 USA Ma et al. (2008) TCT-6 None6 AGT-14, 28 AGT-91, 101, 119, 124 AGT-51, 610, 73
64.1 USA Ma et al. (2008) TCT-6 None7 AGT-212 AGT-81, 93, 106, 1111, 121 AGT-61, 78
*

Superscript numbers represent the number of plasmid clones analysed for respective repeats. For example, ‘AGT-62, 71’ in the MG191-F locus of strain M2282 indicates six and seven copies of the AGT repeat present in two plasmid clones and one plasmid clone, respectively. Repeat units not shown with a superscript number were determined by direct sequencing.

From the published genome sequence of the type strain G37 (GenBank no. NC_000908).

Specimens 199.0 and 199.1 were from patient no. 199 on his first visit and a 10 day follow-up visit, respectively; specimens 64.0 and 64.1 were from patient no. 64 on his first visit and an 11 day follow-up visit, respectively.

PCR and sequencing of the MgPa operon and MgPar regions.

The whole MgPa operon sequence and complete or partial sequences of nine MgPars were amplified by PCR as described elsewhere (Ma et al., 2007, 2010). Proofreading rTth DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems) was used to amplify DNA from all axenic isolates and AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems) for DNA from all urine specimens. Initially, all PCR products were directly sequenced using internal primers. If there was any indication of mixed or ambiguous sequences present in the sequence chromatograms, the PCR products were cloned into pCR 2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and multiple plasmid clones were sequenced as described previously (Ma et al., 2007, 2010). In addition, all TTR regions in the four urine specimens were sequenced after subcloning, as previous studies have found extensive variation in the MG191 and MG192 genes in clinical specimens (Ma et al., 2007; Iverson-Cabral et al., 2006).

The sequence data involved in this study included the complete MgPa operon of all 15 strains (GenBank accession numbers FJ872584–FJ872592 and GU226196–GU226203), the complete sequence of all nine MgPars in the two sequential specimens from patient no. 199 (GenBank accession numbers EF117293–EF117301), the complete sequence of MgPars 3, 6, 8 and 9 and the TTR-containing regions of other MgPars in the two sequential specimens of patient no. 64 (GenBank accession numbers FJ872560–FJ872569 and FJ872593), the 5′-portion of MgPar 1 (containing MG191-EF1 and MG191-EF2 homologous regions) in all five Danish isolates (GenBank accession numbers FJ872570–FJ872574), and the MG192-L homologous region in MgPars 2, 8 and 9 in two Danish isolates M2321 and M2341 (GenBank accession numbers FJ872575–FJ872583). Because there was a high cost to sequence all nine MgPars of each strain and because studies of selected strains had allowed us to identify the TTR loci and their variability, we did not analyse all nine MgPars in all strains involved in this study.

Possibility of generation of TTR variation during PCR amplification.

To investigate the possibility of deletion or insertion of TTR units during PCR amplification, a plasmid clone containing the G37 MG192 repeat region (Ma et al., 2007) was amplified by PCR using primers 5346F and 227529R (Ma et al., 2007) and conditions described below. In addition, the four urine samples were amplified in at least two independent PCRs followed by separate cloning and sequencing for each of the following regions: (1) TTRs in the MG192-L region in all four samples (using primers 5346F and 227529); and (2) the MG191-EF region (using primers (2833F and 4146R) and the MG191-F region (using primers 3942F and 4146R) in samples 64.0 and 64.1. The sequences of all primers have been reported elsewhere (Ma et al., 2007, 2010). The PCR mixture (50 µl) contained 10 ng plasmid DNA or 2 µl DNA extract from urine specimens, 0.5 µM each primer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1× PCR buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.3; 50 mM KCl; 2.5 mM MgCl2) and 2.5 U AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems). Amplification was performed in a PTC-100 programmable thermal controller (MJ Research) with a touchdown cycling protocol as follows: 95 °C for 8 min, then 10 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 2 min at 65 °C (with a decrease by 1.5 °C every cycle to reach 50 °C in the last cycle) and 3 min at 72 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 2 min at 50 °C and 3 min at 72 °C. Each experiment included a negative control without template DNA. The PCR product was cloned into the pCR 2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and plasmid clones were sequenced as described previously (Ma et al., 2007).

Results

Location and variability of TTRs in the MgPa operon

Comparison of the complete MgPa operon sequence in 15 strains and the G37 type strain revealed TTRs in four regions of the MG191 gene (designated region MG191-C, MG191-EF1, MG191-EF2 and MG191-F, respectively) and one region of the MG192 gene (designated MG192-L) (Fig. 1). All of these TTRs showed variation in the repeat copy number among and within strains except for the TTR in the MG191-EF1 region, which showed variation only among strains, not within strains (Table 1; see also Supplementary Fig. S1, available with the online version of this paper). The TTR unit was either TCT or AGT and was consistent for each of the regions except the MG192-L region, where some strains had AGT repeat units and others had TCT repeats (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. S1E). The repeat units in the MG191-EF1 region may also include ACT and TCC as degenerative repeat units (Supplementary Fig. S1B). Mixed alleles were observed in four TTR loci in four axenic isolates from Denmark and in urine specimens of both patients from New Orleans (Table 1). In all samples containing mixed TTR alleles, the number of repeats varied by only one or two repeat units.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Distribution of TTRs in the MG191 and MG192 genes and nine MgPars of M. genitalium. Divisions A to M in the MG191 and MG192 genes are indicated by vertical lines in the map at the top, representing the restriction fragments described previously (Dallo & Baseman, 1991; Peterson et al., 1995). The four hyperviable regions B, EF, G and JKLM are highlighted in different colours (Ma et al., 2010). Regions homologous between MG191/MG192 and MgPars are indicated in identical colours. The hatched boxes represent intervening sequences that are unusually A-T rich and contain stop codons. The numbers bordering each segment of each of the MgPars refer to the nucleotide positions in G37 full-length MgPars as described elsewhere (Iverson-Cabral et al., 2006; Ma et al., 2010). The line length in the diagrams is not always proportional to the number of nucleotides involved due to the presence of minor deletions/insertions. The TTR regions are indicated by dark black ovals, with their location designated MG191-C, MG-EF1, Mg191-EF2, MG191-F and MG191-L.

Location and variability of TTRs in MgPars

We analysed all nine complete MgPar sequences in the G37 type strain and urine specimens from patient 199, and additional complete or partial MgPars in the five Danish isolates and urine specimens from patient 64 (Ma et al., 2010). TTRs were identified in all MgPars except for MgPar 3. Each MgPar (except for MgPar 3) contained two TTR loci in the region homologous to the MG191-EF1 and MG191-EF2 regions. One additional TTR locus was present in the MG192-L homologous region of MgPars 2, 8 and 9. In total, 19 TTR loci were identified within MgPars (indicated by ovals in Fig. 1). These TTRs were variable not only in the repeat copy number but also in the repeat unit sequence. The most predominant repeat units were TCT/ACT in MG191-EF1 homologous regions (Supplementary Fig. S2A, B), and AGT in MG191-EF2 homologous regions (Supplementary Fig. S2C, D) and MG192-L homologous regions (Table 2). The TTR pattern in MG191-EF1 homologous regions was complicated by the presence of mixed repeat units, primarily consisting of TCT and ACT, and, less frequently, TCC and TCA. All such repeat units encode either serine (AGT, TCT, TCC and TCA) or threonine (ACT). A mixture of TCT and ACT was also present in the MG192-L homologous region of MgPar 8 (Table 2). TTRs in the MG192-L homologous region of MgPars 2, 8 and 9 showed variation in the repeat copy number and in the repeat unit sequence among and within strains (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. S3).

Table 2. TTR variation in MG192-L homologous regions of MgPars 2, 8 and 9.

Specimen Repeat unitcopy number*
MgPar 2 MgPar 8 MgPar 9
G37† AGT16 AGT10 AGT9
199.0 AGT4-6 TCT9-11ACT6-8 AGT5
199.1 AGT4-5 TCT7-11ACT6-7 AGT5
64.0 AGT7-11 AGT7 AGT6-8
64.1 AGT8-11 AGT7 AGT7-8
M2321 AGT9 ACT1 AGT6 ACT1 AGT6 ACT1
M2341 AGT8 AGT6 AGT6
*

Both urine specimens from each of patients 199 and 64 were analysed by sequencing plasmid clones while the two Danish isolates were studied by direct sequencing.

From the published genome sequence of the type strain G37 GenBank no. NC_000908.

Possibility of generation of TTR variation during PCR amplification

To investigate the possibility that the observed TTR variability was due to errors during PCR amplification, we first analysed 15 plasmid clones generated from PCR amplification of the G37 MG192-L repeat region. No variation in the TTR sequence or copy number was observed. Further, we performed replicate PCR amplifications of the MG192-L, MG191-EF and MG191-F regions in the four patient urine specimens followed by cloning and sequence analysis. However, significant differences in the distribution of sequence variants between different PCR runs were not found (Ma et al., 2007 and data not shown). In addition, no TTR copy number variation was seen in up to 18 plasmid clones of the MG191-EF2 or MG192-L region in samples 199.0 or 199.1, or the MG191-EF2 region in sample 64.1 (Table 1). These data strongly suggest that artefactual slipped-strand mispairing events did not occur during PCR amplification.

Discussion

In the present study we identified abundant TTRs, which were present in five regions of the MgPa operon and 19 regions of MgPars. Only five of them, including two in the MgPa operon (MG191-F and MG192-L regions) and three in MgPars (MG192-L homologous region in each of MgPars 2, 8 and 9), have been described in previous publications (Iverson-Cabral et al., 2006, 2007; Jensen, 2006; Ma et al., 2007, 2008; Rocha & Blanchard, 2002; van Belkum et al., 1998). These TTRs were variable not only in the repeat copy number but also in the repeat unit sequence.

The TTR variations observed in this study could be due to the following mechanisms.

Firstly, slipped-strand mispairing is likely the primary mechanism for the variation of TTRs present in the MG191-C and MG191-F regions (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1A, D) because (1) both regions are present in a single copy in the genome and their flanking regions have no homology to any of the nine MgPar sequences and thus are not expected to undergo recombination with MgPars; and (2) TTR variation in these two regions, particularly in the MG191-F region, was commonly present as mixed sequences in the same specimen, reflecting stepwise addition or deletion of one repeat unit (Table 1), which is typically the result of the slipped-strand mispairing mechanism in other bacteria (Levinson & Gutman, 1987).

Secondly, homologous recombination is likely responsible for much of the TTR variation in the MG191 and M192 repeat regions (MG191-EF1, MG191-EF2 and MG192-L) as well as in some MgPars, as a result of recombination between MG191 or M192 and MgPars that contain different numbers of repeat units or between MgPars, as has been noted in previous studies (Ma et al., 2007). This possibility is supported by the presence of long stretches of constant sequences flanking the TTR region between MG191 or MG192 and MgPars as exemplified in Supplementary Fig. S3 for the TTR variation in the MG192-L region in specimens from patient 64. These constant sequences could serve as anchors for recombination reactions. The MG192 variants containing six or seven AGT units might have resulted from recombination of the MG192 variant containing five AGT units with MgPar 2, 8 or 9 containing six or seven AGT units. Importantly, such recombination may occur alone or together with slipped-strand mispairing.

Thirdly, site-specific recombination and additional, unidentified mechanisms may be involved in the TTR variation of some regions of the MgPa operon and MgPars. For example, in the MG192-L TTR region AGT repeats were found in all strains tested except for three strains (M2321, M2341 and M6280) which contained TCT repeats (Supplementary Fig. S1). Such variation obviously cannot be explained by slipped-strand mispairing. Furthermore, we sequenced the MG192-L homologous region in MgPars 2, 8 and 9 of strains M2321 and M2341 (other MgPars have no homology to this region) and did not find TCT repeats (Table 2), suggesting that the occurrence of TCT repeat tracts in these strains did not result from homologous recombination with MgPars. Given that the TTRs in the MG191-C and MG191-EF1 regions are exclusively made up of TCT repeats (Supplementary Fig. S1), we speculate a possibility of translocation of the TCT repeats between different TTR regions by a mechanism independent of homologous recombination. Another example is a likely translocation of the TCTn-ACTn repeats from MgPar 9 (MG191-EF homologous region) to MgPar 8 (MG192-L homologous region) in the patient 199 specimens (Supplementary Fig. S4). Together, these two examples suggest that other mechanisms for generation of TTR variability may exist, including site-specific recombination or recombination with additional, unidentified MgPar regions. Further insight into the mechanisms of TTR and MgPar variability will likely be revealed by complete genome sequencing of additional M. genitalium strains.

Given the small size of the M. genitalium genome, the maintenance of abundant TTRs in the MgPa operon and MgPars is likely to be of functional importance. It is worthy of note that, despite the abundance of TTRs in MgPa and MgPars, we did not find other tandem repeats containing repeat units other than multiples of three nucleotides (such as dinucleotides, tetranucleotides, pentanucleotides, etc., whose copy number changes would lead to abrogation of the reading frame and disruption of protein translation). The TTR units present in the MgPa operon are primarily composed of either AGT or TCT as shown in this study (Table 1). Other units, including TCC, TCA and ACT, are also present in the MG191-EF1 region of the MgPa operon and in its homologous region in MgPars (Supplementary Fig. S2), which are likely to recombine into the MgPa operon (Iverson-Cabral et al., 2006, 2007; Jensen, 2006; Ma et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 1995). Interestingly, all such repeat units encode either serine (TCT, TCC and TCA) or threonine (ACT). The strict preservation of Ser/Thr residues in five regions of the MgPa operon suggests an important role of these amino acids in maintaining the structure of the MG191 and MG192 proteins encoded by this operon. Changes in the repeat copy number of TTRs in MgPa operon do not interrupt the reading frame but result in heterogeneity in the size of the poly(Ser/Thr) tract. The functional significance of the Ser/Thr-rich repetitive motifs in the MgPa operon is unknown. They could presumably serve as flexible spacer regions to optimize protein interactions, as has been proposed for polyserine domains in other organisms (Hall et al., 1989; Howard et al., 2004). They may also provide sites for protein modifications such as glycosylation and phosphorylation as has been found in studies of Ser/Thr-rich proteins in yeast (Bowen & Wheals, 2006). In addition, variation in the size of the poly(Ser/Thr) tract may increase antigenicity of the MG191 and MG192 proteins (Iverson-Cabral et al., 2006, 2007; Jensen, 2006; Ma et al., 2007, 2010; Peterson et al., 1995).

In summary, we have identified abundant TTRs in the MgPa operon and MgPars, which are variable in the repeat copy number and/or in the repeat unit sequence. There are multiple potential mechanisms involved in TTR variation. Extensive TTR variation may confer maximal variation to the MgPa operon and enhance antigenic variation, thus optimizing the organism’s adhesion, colonization and immune evasion.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the US Department of Defense (grant W81XWH-08-1-0676), a Gulf South Sexually Transmitted Infections/Topical Microbicide Cooperative Research Center grant from the NIH-NIAID (5 U19 AI061972), the Louisiana Vaccine Center and the South Louisiana Institute for Infectious Disease Research sponsored by the Louisiana Board of Regents (grant 149752505J). We thank Mary Welch and Judy Burnett for technical assistance. Part of this work was presented at the 17th Congress of the International Organization for Mycoplasmology, 6–11 July 2008, Tianjin, China.

Abbreviations:

TTR

trinucleotide tandem repeat

Footnotes

Four supplementary figures are available with the online version of this paper.

References

  1. Bowen S., Wheals A. E. (2006). Ser/Thr-rich domains are associated with genetic variation and morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 23, 633–640 10.1002/yea.1381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlesworth B., Sniegowski P., Stephan W. (1994). The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 371, 215–220 10.1038/371215a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clausen H. F., Fedder J., Drasbek M., Nielsen P. K., Toft B., Ingerslev H. J., Birkelund S., Christiansen G. (2001). Serological investigation of Mycoplasma genitalium in infertile women. Hum Reprod 16, 1866–1874 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dallo S. F., Baseman J. B. (1991). Adhesin gene of Mycoplasma genitalium exists as multiple copies. Microb Pathog 10, 475–480 10.1016/0882-4010(91)90113-O [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Prospero N. A., Fischbeck K. H. (2005). Therapeutics development for triplet repeat expansion diseases. Nat Rev Genet 6, 756–765 10.1038/nrg1690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fraser C. M., Gocayne J. D., White O., Adams M. D., Clayton R. A., Fleischmann R. D., Bult C. J., Kerlavage A. R., Sutton G. & other authors (1995). The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium. Science 270, 397–403 10.1126/science.270.5235.397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Glass J. I., Assad-Garcia N., Alperovich N., Yooseph S., Lewis M. R., Maruf M., Hutchison C. A., III, Smith H. O., Venter J. C. (2006). Essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 425–430 10.1073/pnas.0510013103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall J., Hazlewood G. P., Huskisson N. S., Durrant A. J., Gilbert H. J. (1989). Conserved serine-rich sequences in xylanase and cellulase from Pseudomonas fluorescens subspecies cellulosa: internal signal sequence and unusual protein processing. Mol Microbiol 3, 1211–1219 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00271.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamasuna R., Osada Y., Jensen J. S. (2005). Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Mycoplasma genitalium by TaqMan 5′ nuclease real-time PCR. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49, 4993–4998 10.1128/AAC.49.12.4993-4998.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamasuna R., Osada Y., Jensen J. S. (2007). Isolation of Mycoplasma genitalium from first-void urine specimens by coculture with Vero cells. J Clin Microbiol 45, 847–850 10.1128/JCM.02056-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hjorth S. V., Björnelius E., Lidbrink P., Falk L., Dohn B., Berthelsen L., Ma L., Martin D. H., Jensen J. S. (2006). Sequence-based typing of Mycoplasma genitalium reveals sexual transmission. J Clin Microbiol 44, 2078–2083 10.1128/JCM.00003-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Howard M. B., Ekborg N. A., Taylor L. E., Hutcheson S. W., Weiner R. M. (2004). Identification and analysis of polyserine linker domains in prokaryotic proteins with emphasis on the marine bacterium Microbulbifer degradans. Protein Sci 13, 1422–1425 10.1110/ps.03511604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Htun H., Dahlberg J. E. (1989). Topology and formation of triple-stranded H-DNA. Science 243, 1571–1576 10.1126/science.2648571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hu P. C., Schaper U., Collier A. M., Clyde W. A., Jr, Horikawa M., Huang Y. S., Barile M. F. (1987). A Mycoplasma genitalium protein resembling the Mycoplasma pneumoniae attachment protein. Infect Immun 55, 1126–1131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iverson-Cabral S. L., Astete S. G., Cohen C. R., Rocha E. P., Totten P. A. (2006). Intrastrain heterogeneity of the mgpB gene in Mycoplasma genitalium is extensive in vitro and in vivo and suggests that variation is generated via recombination with repetitive chromosomal sequences. Infect Immun 74, 3715–3726 10.1128/IAI.00239-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iverson-Cabral S. L., Astete S. G., Cohen C. R., Totten P. A. (2007). mgpB and mgpC sequence diversity in Mycoplasma genitalium is generated by segmental reciprocal recombination with repetitive chromosomal sequences. Mol Microbiol 66, 55–73 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05898.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jensen J. S. (2006). Mycoplasma genitalium infections. Diagnosis, clinical aspects, and pathogenesis. Dan Med Bull 53, 1–27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jensen J. S. (2009). Single-dose azithromycin treatment for Mycoplasma genitalium-positive urethritis: best but not good enough. Clin Infect Dis 48, 1655–1656 10.1086/599034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jensen J. S., Hansen H. T., Lind K. (1996). Isolation of Mycoplasma genitalium strains from the male urethra. J Clin Microbiol 34, 286–291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jensen J. S., Bradshaw C. S., Tabrizi S. N., Fairley C. K., Hamasuna R. (2008). Azithromycin treatment failure in Mycoplasma genitalium-positive patients with nongonococcal urethritis is associated with induced macrolide resistance. Clin Infect Dis 47, 1546–1553 10.1086/593188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Levinson G., Gutman G. A. (1987). Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 4, 203–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ma L., Martin D. H. (2004). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the rRNA operon and variable numbers of tandem repeats in the lipoprotein gene among Mycoplasma genitalium strains from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 42, 4876–4878 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4876-4878.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma L., Jensen J. S., Myers L., Burnett J., Welch M., Jia Q., Martin D. H. (2007). Mycoplasma genitalium: an efficient strategy to generate genetic variation from a minimal genome. Mol Microbiol 66, 220–236 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05911.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma L., Taylor S., Jensen J. S., Myers L., Lillis R., Martin D. H. (2008). Short tandem repeat sequences in the Mycoplasma genitalium genome and their use in a multilocus genotyping system. BMC Microbiol 8, 130 10.1186/1471-2180-8-130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ma L., Jensen J. S., Mancuso M., Hamasuna R., Jia Q., McGowin C. L., Martin D. H. (2010). Genetic variation in the complete MgPa operon and its repetitive chromosomal elements in clinical strains of Mycoplasma genitalium. PLoS ONE 5, e15660 10.1371/journal.pone.0015660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McGowin C. L., Spagnuolo R. A., Pyles R. B. (2010). Mycoplasma genitalium rapidly disseminates to the upper reproductive tracts and knees of female mice following vaginal inoculation. Infect Immun 78, 726–736 10.1128/IAI.00840-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morrison-Plummer J., Lazzell A., Baseman J. B. (1987). Shared epitopes between Mycoplasma pneumoniae major adhesin protein P1 and a 140-kilodalton protein of Mycoplasma genitalium. Infect Immun 55, 49–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peterson S. N., Bailey C. C., Jensen J. S., Borre M. B., King E. S., Bott K. F., Hutchison C. A., III (1995). Characterization of repetitive DNA in the Mycoplasma genitalium genome: possible role in the generation of antigenic variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 11829–11833 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Richard G. F., Kerrest A., Dujon B. (2008). Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72, 686–727 10.1128/MMBR.00011-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rocha E. P., Blanchard A. (2002). Genomic repeats, genome plasticity and the dynamics of Mycoplasma evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 2031–2042 10.1093/nar/30.9.2031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Svenstrup H. F., Jensen J. S., Gevaert K., Birkelund S., Christiansen G. (2006). Identification and characterization of immunogenic proteins of Mycoplasma genitalium. Clin Vaccine Immunol 13, 913–922 10.1128/CVI.00048-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tully J. G., Cole R. M., Taylor-Robinson D., Rose D. L. (1981). A newly discovered mycoplasma in the human urogenital tract. Lancet 317, 1288–1291 10.1016/S0140-6736(81)92461-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Belkum A., Scherer S., van Alphen L., Verbrugh H. (1998). Short-sequence DNA repeats in prokaryotic genomes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 275–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Verstrepen K. J., Jansen A., Lewitter F., Fink G. R. (2005). Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability. Nat Genet 37, 986–990 10.1038/ng1618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary figures

Articles from Journal of Medical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES