Skip to main content
The Scientific World Journal logoLink to The Scientific World Journal
. 2012 May 2;2012:902464. doi: 10.1100/2012/902464

Application of Hyphenated Techniques in Speciation Analysis of Arsenic, Antimony, and Thallium

Rajmund Michalski 1,*, Sebastian Szopa 1, Magdalena Jabłońska 1, Aleksandra Łyko 1
PMCID: PMC3354673  PMID: 22654649

Abstract

Due to the fact that metals and metalloids have a strong impact on the environment, the methods of their determination and speciation have received special attention in recent years. Arsenic, antimony, and thallium are important examples of such toxic elements. Their speciation is especially important in the environmental and biomedical fields because of their toxicity, bioavailability, and reactivity. Recently, speciation analytics has been playing a unique role in the studies of biogeochemical cycles of chemical compounds, determination of toxicity and ecotoxicity of selected elements, quality control of food products, control of medicines and pharmaceutical products, technological process control, research on the impact of technological installation on the environment, examination of occupational exposure, and clinical analysis. Conventional methods are usually labor intensive, time consuming, and susceptible to interferences. The hyphenated techniques, in which separation method is coupled with multidimensional detectors, have become useful alternatives. The main advantages of those techniques consist in extremely low detection and quantification limits, insignificant interference, influence as well as high precision and repeatability of the determinations. In view of their importance, the present work overviews and discusses different hyphenated techniques used for arsenic, antimony, and thallium species analysis, in different clinical, environmental and food matrices.

1. Speciation Analytics and Hyphenated Techniques

Speciation, as word borrowed from biology, is a term describing the existence of various chemical and physical forms of a particular element while speciation analytics denotes the determination of those forms [1]. The notion of speciation is used in chemistry to determine the occurrence of diverse forms of a given element (e.g., element at various oxidation states or bound with different ligands) in the analysed sample. The forms might differ in physical and chemical characteristics as well as in the influence they exert on living organisms. In the last several decades, speciation analytics has become one of the most central issues in analytical chemistry [2].

Even though its cost is significant, speciation analytics has been gaining greater importance when it comes to solving problems that concern not only the determination of total element contents but also taking into account various forms of occurrence. It plays an exceptional role in the examination of biochemical cycles of selected chemical compounds, determination of toxicity and ecotoxicity of selected elements, food and pharmaceutical product quality control, technological process control, as well as health risk assessment and clinical analytics [3]. Within the speciation analytics framework, determination of substances produced and emitted into the environment by humans and the analysis of natural compounds (formed as a result of biochemical transformations in living organisms or in the environment) can be differentiated. Environmental analytics deals with the former group while the latter one involves the biochemical and ecotoxic examinations.

It is also reasonable to differentiate between chemical and physical speciation. It is possible to distinguish between screening speciation (searching for and determining selected chemical forms) and distribution speciation (searching for and determining selected chemical individuals in specific elements of the examined sample) in chemical speciation. Another division within chemical speciation concerns group speciation (searching for and determining specific groups or classes of chemical forms) and individual speciation (searching for and determining all chemical individuals present in the sample) [4]. When it comes to liquid sample analyses, the most common technique is the one developed by Florence and Batley [5].

According to this method, a water or wastewater sample filtered through a 0.45 μm filter is divided into a solid phase and mobile one, in which the determinations of total metal contents as well as the metal labile and bound forms are carried out.

The division suggested by Tessier et al. [6] is recommended in the research concerning the speciation of heavy metals in bottom sediments. They distinguished and defined five fractions, that is, exchangeable metals, carbonate-bound metals, iron and manganese oxides-bound metals, organic matter-bound metals, and other mineral-bound metals. Nonetheless, this method of speciation does not allow the differentiation between oxidation states of elements, which may be of great importance when considering their toxicity.

The analyte determination completes the procedure in which sampling is one of the most crucial stages. It is particularly important in speciation analytics as even the routine processes, such as dilution, pH changes caused by sample preservation, temperature, and pressure alternations, can bring about irreversible transformations in the primary analyte form [7]. Particular difficulties appear when the sample is collected under conditions considerably dissimilar to those in which it is later analyzed. It happens for instance when samples are collected from the lower strata of water bodies. Pressure drops trigger the emission of gaseous elements. For example, if it is CO2, then the increase of the sample pH, acid-base balance changing, and increasing stability of complexes as well as precipitation of sparingly soluble sediments follow.

The lability and changeability of the sample is crucial when biological material is studied. Microbiological, enzymatic, photochemical, and other processes whose character is often unclear and unexpected can still occur in these samples after their collection [8]. Lowering the detection limits of analytes to extremely low concentration levels resulted in the fact that methods used so far did not always meet the necessary requirements [9]. For that reason, there has been a tendency for several years to combine various methods and techniques. These combinations are known as the hyphenated techniques. A suitable hyphenated technique should be selective towards determined analytes, sensitive within a wide range of concentrations, and ought to enable possibly best identification of the determined substances.

In speciation analytics, chromatographic methods are largely used for separation [10] whereas spectroscopic ones are employed for detection [11, 12], albeit the application of other methods is also possible [13]. The application of hyphenated techniques entails perfect understanding of analytical methodologies and detailed knowledge of the apparatus. These are expensive systems used in scientific research rather than in routine analyses.

The earliest hyphenated techniques were developed by coupling gas chromatography with various detectors. The following systems were elaborated: GC-AAS (Gas Chromatography—Atomic Absorption Spectrometry), GC-AES (Gas Chromatography—Emission Atomic Spectrometry), GC-MS (Gas Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry) or GC-ICP-MS-TOF (Gas Chromatography—Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass Spectrometry—Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry).

Due to technological reasons, systems employing liquid chromatography methods for separation of analyzed substances, such as HPLC-ICP-MS (High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass Spectrometry), appeared in the market slightly later. It is often thought that there exist elements (or their specific chemical forms) essential for the proper functioning of living organisms and elements (or their compounds) that interfere with metabolic processes. To paraphrase Paracelsus, a physician and chemist living in the 16th century, what ought to be discussed are significant or toxic concentrations or the amounts of elements and their diverse chemical forms.

The results of toxicological tests indicate that in many cases it is not the total content of a given element but the share of its particular forms that has a decisive influence on living organisms. Due to that fact, the knowledge of various elemental forms is more important than the information on its total content [14]. Elements occurring in ionic forms predominantly demonstrate biological activity and toxicity affecting living organisms. Ion chromatography is the most popular method serving to separate and determine organic and inorganic ionic substances [15]. It is applied in the hyphenated techniques and speciation analytics mainly for the determination of selected water disinfection by-products [16], as well as ions and metalloids [9].

Among the most popular hyphenated techniques used to determine different ionic forms of metals and metalloids, there are couplings of various liquid chromatography types. These include HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography), IC (Ion Chromatography), I-EC (Ion-Exclusion Chromatography), or SEC (Size Exclusion Chromatography) with ICP MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry) or ESI MS (Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry) [17]. The most popular hyphenated techniques utilizing ion chromatography are IC-ICP-MS (Ion Chromatography—Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass Spectrometry), IC-ICP-OES (Ion Chromatography-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry), and IC-MS (Ion Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry) [18, 19].

The application of mass spectrometry detection allows not only to obtain the information on the qualitive and quantitative content of the sample but also to determine the structure and molar masses of the analytes. The main difficulties in using mass spectrometry detector coupled with chromatographic methods result from the fact that it is necessary to maintain very low pressure in the spectrometer while separated analyte ions leave the chromatographic column under comparatively high pressure.

While it was relatively easy to couple a gas chromatograph with mass spectrometry detector, a large amount of the eluate in the case of liquid chromatography was a major obstacle in the introduction of HPLC-ESI-MS system into the laboratory practice [20]. Various ionization sources can be utilized in the HPLC-ESI-MS apparatus. These include ESI (Electrospray Ionization), APCI (Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization), or APPI (Atmospheric Pressure Photochemical Ionization). The range of these applications depends on the polarity and mass of the analytes as well as the eluent flow rate. MS detection can be carried out in SIM (Selected Ion Monitoring) or SM (Scan Mode) modes. The former provides the information on the analyte mass while the latter offers data regarding mass spectra and mass distribution. The problems concerning identification in the case of large molecules relate mainly to the fact that there is a higher number of possibilities that the obtained spectra will have the same ratios of mass to charge.

It is estimated that approxmately 50% of all publications on the subject of speciation analytics involve only five elements, that is, arsenic, selenium, mercury, chromium, and tin.

Further 30% of papers are devoted to copper, zinc, lead, and iron [21]. The following literature review discusses arsenic, antimony, and thallium. The described elements have complex physical and chemical characteristics and are of great interest for both toxicologists and analytical chemists. Among them, arsenic and its compounds are the best known and described. Less information on antimony is available while thallium and it compounds are still the most mysterious and unfamiliar.

2. Arsenic

Arsenic is a metalloid from group 15 of the periodic table. Its most important oxidation states are of −3, +3, and +5. Arsenic compounds were known in the Antiquity. Later, it gained great importance in medicine; it is even said to have been the basis of the modern pharmacology. People started using organoarsenic compounds at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

They turned out to be far less toxic for humans and animals than the inorganic ones. Nevertheless, nearly all arsenic medicines were withdrawn from the market in the second part of the previous century. Even though they were highly effective, they were also carcinogenic. Nowadays, arsenic compounds are used in medicine only very seldom. However, the interest in employing arsenic trioxide in the antineoplastic therapy has increased in recent years [72].

Arsenic has also been used in semiconductor production (as gallium arsenide), improving the quality of selected alloys, chemical warfare weapon industry, and wood conservation. It has also been added to glass as it provides a greenish glow. In addition, arsenic compounds have been employed in tanning and as pigments and pesticides [73]. Arsenic occurs in several hundred minerals, mainly in pyrite, and in lead and copper ores. It also appears in nature in a number of organic compounds such as arsenate (arsenic acid)—H3AsO4, arsenite (arsenious acid)—HAsO2, dimethylarsonic acid DMAA—(CH3)2AsO(OH), cacodylic acid (CH3)2AsO2H, dimethylarsine DMA—(CH3)2AsH, methylarsine, trimethylarsine oxide TMAO—(CH3)3AsO, tetramethylarsonium salts, arsenobetaine AsB—(CH3)3As+CH2COOH and arsenocholine AsC—(CH3)3As+CH2 CH2OH.

Anthropogenic sources of arsenic and its compounds comprise by-product emissions in mining and smelting of nonferrous metal ores and fossil fuels combustion (mainly brown and hard coals). Total world production of arsenic amounted to approximately 75,000 tonnes in 2005. Around three quarters of this amount was used for wood preservation and one fifth in agriculture for herbicide manufacturing. The remaining amount was employed in nonferrous alloys and glass production. Whereas in highly industrialized countries applications of arsenic and its compounds have become more and more limited, they are still broadly used in developed countries, even though their toxic characteristics are widely known. It is estimated that 20% of population in Bangladesh consume water highly contaminated with arsenic and its compounds [36]. Arsenic is a very mobile element. For that reason, it occurs in all units of the environment. It easily migrates from the lithosphere into the hydrosphere, and its content in natural water is highly diversified and determined by the ground type and water pollution. Regulations that are in force in most European countries state that the total arsenic content in soil ought not to exceed 20 mg/1 kg of soil. Its admissible amount in drinking water amounts to 10 μg/L, although its concentrations can exceed even several dozen mg/L in surface and underground water depending on geological conditions.

In the atmosphere, arsenic occurs mainly in the forms of AsO3 and volatile organic compounds. Its mean concentration ranges between 1 ng/m3 in the countryside, 2 ng/m3 in the urban areas, and up to 50 ng/m3 in industrial regions.

Selected arsenic compounds determined with its speciation analytics encompass:

  1. inorganic ones such as arsenite (arsenious acid)—HAsO2—and arsenate (arsenic acid)—H3AsO4 among the inorganic compounds, H2AsO4 (pH = 2–7), HAsO4 2− (pH > 7), and H3AsO3 (pH<9) are stable;

  2. organic ones such as monomethylarsine MMA—CH3AsH2, monomethylarsonic acid MMAA—CH3AsO(OH)2, dimethylarsine DMA—(CH3)2AsH, dimethylarsonic acid DMAA—(CH3)2AsO(OH), arsenobetaine AsB—(CH3)3As+CH2COOH, arsenocholine AsC—(CH3)3As+CH2CH2OH, trimethylarsine oxide TMAO—(CH3)3AsO, tetramethylarsonium ion Me4As+—(CH3)4As+, and arsenic-containing ribosides arsenosugars—various sugar structures [117].

All arsenic compounds, to a higher or lesser extent, possess carcinogenic and protoplasmatic (they destroy bacteria cell walls) characteristics. However, the toxicity of arsenic compounds depends on the form in which they are consumed and on their mobility. In general, it is assumed that their harmfulness decreases in the following order: arsines > inorganic arsenites > organic trivalent compounds (arsenoxides), inorganic arsenates > organic pentavalent compounds > arsonium compounds > elemental arsenic. Arsenobetaine and arsenocholine are considered nontoxic. The symptoms of the chronic poisoning appear usually after a few years. They may include various forms of kidney, lung, liver, skin, or urinary bladder neoplasms. A prolonged skin contact with the arsenic dust can cause several types of skin cancer. What is interesting, long-term ingestion of low doses of arsenic compounds increases the body resistance against acute poisoning. In December 2010, there appeared information about the discovery of arsenophile GFAJ-1 bacteria that were able to sustain its growth in culture medium in which phosphorous had been replaced with arsenic (http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/astrobiology_toxic_chemical.html).

It was suggested that arsenic might have been incorporated into biomolecules (e.g., DNA) which maintained its proper biological activity in this form. Nevertheless, this information was denied in March 2011. Arsenic speciation analytics makes use of the hyphenated techniques, such as HPLC-ESI-MS, IC-MS, or IC-ICP-MS [118120], to separate and determine particular forms of the element. The literature data concerning arsenic speciation analytics with various hyphenated techniques is given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Selected examples of application of hyphenated techniques in arsenic speciation.

Analytes Analytical column Mobile phase Method of separation and detection Matrix Reference
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP-X100
Dionex AS7, AG7
75 mM Na3PO4,
2.5–50 mM HNO3
HPLC-ICP-MS Surface water, mining water, underground water [22]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB, AC Waters IC-Pak CM/D
Waters Guard-Pak CM/D
NaHCO3/Na2CO3, HNO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Water [23]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP-X100 10–200 mM NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-DRC-MS Sediments [24]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP-X100 30 mM NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-MS Soils [25]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Hamilton PRP-X100 20 mM NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-DRC-MS Polluted waters, leach [26]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Dionex AG-11, AS-11 NaOH, HNO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Urine [27]
As3+, As5+,
MMA, DMA, AB, AC
Hamilton PRP-X100 0.3% HNO3, 10% methanol HPLC-ICP-MS, HPLC-ESI MS Fish sauce [28]
As3+, As5+ Hamilton PRP X-100 Na2CO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Surface water [29]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Dionex AS7 HNO3 HPLC- ICP-MS, HPLC- INAA Waters, rice extracts [30]
As3+, As5+ Dionex AS9 NaOH, Na2CO3, NaHCO3 HPLC-SF-ICP-MS Soils [31]
As3+, As5+ Wescan Anion-S C18 EDTA HPLC- ICP-MS River waters, sludge [32]
As3+, As5+ Biosil 125 SEC CH3COONH4 HPLC- ICP-MS Fish tissues [33]
As3+, As5+ Waters IC-Pak A HC NaOH, KNO3 HPLC- ICP-MS Water, sludge [34]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB, AC Develosil C30-UG-5, Chemcosorb 7SAX sodium butanesulfonate, malonic acid, tetramethylammonium hydroxide, methanol, ammonium tartrate HPLC- ICP-MS Biological and environmental samples [35]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Dionex AG7, AS7 nitric acid, 1-benzene-2-disulfonic acid dipotassium salt HPLC-ICP-MS Seafood [36]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP-X100 NH4H2PO4, NH4HPO4, CH3COONH4, NaHCO3, NH4NO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Soils, plant tissues [37]
As3+, As5+ Dionex AG12A/AS 12A disodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, methanol HPLC-ICP-MS Iron rich water samples [38]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP X100 NH4NO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Water [39]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP X100, NH4H2PO4 HPLC- DF-ICP-MS Cucumber sap [40]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Hamilton PRP X100 NH4H2PO4, NH4HPO4, MeOH HPLC-ICP-MS Rice, soil, straw, hair, nails [41]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB, AC, TMAO Hamilton PRP X100, Zorbax 300-SCX pyridine, NH4H2PO4 HPLC-SF-MS Water, sediments, plants [42]
As3+, As5+, DMA G 3154A/101 EDTA, NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-MS Soils [43]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB 65001 and 65002 Na2EDTA, NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-MS Urine [44]
As3+, As5+,MMA, DMA, AB Supelcosil LC-SCX pyridine, NaHCO3, Na2CO3 HPLC-ICP-MS
HPLC-ES-MS
Hair, nail [45]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB, AC, TMAO Dionex AG7, AS7 HNO3, MeOH HPLC-ICP-MS Seafood [46]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Dionex AS14, AS16, AS7 NaOH, NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-MS Poultry wastes [47]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Shodex Asahipak ES-502 N 7Ca HNO3, MeOH HPLC-ICP-MS Biological samples [48]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Hamilton PRP X100 (NH4)2SO4, (NH4)3PO4, NH4HCO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Urine [49]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP X100 MeOH, NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-MS Peanut butter [50]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP X100 (NH4)2HPO4, NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-MS Wool [51]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AC, AB, TMAO, TMAs Hamilton PRP X100 NH4HPO4, (NH4)2HCO3, pyridine, MeOH HPLC-ICP-MS,
HPLC-ES-MS
Chinese seaweeds [52]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Hamilton PRP X100 NH4HPO4, NH4H2PO4 HPLC-ICP-MS Biological samples (fish, rice, chicken) [53]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB Dionex AS7 NH4H2PO4, NH4OH HPLC-ICP-MS Waters [54]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB, AC, TMAO, TMAI Excelpak CHA-E11 HNO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Rats urine [55]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB, AC Dionex AS7, AG7 NaHCO3, Na2CO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Fish, mussel extracts [56]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AB, AC, TMAO, TeMAs+ Dionex AS7, AG7 HNO3, benzene-1,2-disulfonic acid HPLC-ICP-MS Fish oil [57]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AC, AB
TMAO, TeMAs+
Dionex AG4, AS4A HNO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Marine samples [58]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP X100 (NH4)2HPO4, MeOH HPLC-ICP-MS Soil extracts [59]
As3+, As5+ Hamilton PRP X100 CH3COOH, NH4NO3, EDTA HPLC-ICP-MS Drinking water [60]
As3+, As5+ Dionex AS12 NaHCO3, Na2CO3 HPLC-HGAAS Mine tailings [61]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA FIA-HGAAS Seawater [62]
As3+, Total As 0.029 M HNO3, 0.024 M HCl FIA-HGAAS Water samples [63]
As3+, As5+ FI-EHG-AAS Synthetic samples [64]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP-X100 12 mM (NH4)2HPO4, 7.5 mM (NH4)2SO4 10 mM (NH4)2CO3 HPLC-ICP-AES Synthetic samples [65]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AC, AB Hamilton PRP-X100 NH4H2PO4, (NH4)2HPO4 HPLC-NAA Water samples [66]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA LiChrospher 100 RP-18e adsorbent tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate HPLC-ETAAS Water samples [67]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Hamilton PRP X-100 2,5 mM NaH2PO4, 2,5 mM Na2HPO4 HPLC-HGAAS Natural waters [68]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Alltech All-guard Adsorbosphere SAX 5 μm 10 mM KH2PO4 HPLC-HG-AFS Particulate matter [69]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA Dionex AS11, AG11 10 mM–100 mM NaOH HPLC-HG-AFS Polluted soil [70]
As3+, As5+, MMA, DMA, AC, AB Spherisorb ODS/NH2 5 mM NaH2PO4, 5 mM Na2HPO4, HPLC-MO-HG-AAS, HPLC-ICP-MS Water, urine [71]

3. Antimony

Antimony, correspondingly to arsenic, belongs to group 15 of the periodic table. The physical and chemical qualities of both elements are similar. In the past, these two elements and their compounds were often determined together [134]. Its compounds were used as cosmetics in the Ancient Egypt. The alchemists used to believe that where there was antimony, there was gold as well. Antimony is a blue-white brittle metalloid. It behaves like a metal in most reaction. However, in some reactions, it demonstrates nonmetal characteristics. It has a rare quality—its solid form is less dense than its liquid one (similarly to water).

Antimony occurs in coal seams (especially brown coal ones), diesel fuel, and gasoline. Its concentration in coal seams can be as high as 30 mg/kg and it can reach 100 mg/kg in ashes. On the other hand, its concentration in petroleum ranges between 0.001 and 0.1 mg/kg [111]. Antimony is a constituent of many alloys. It is also employed to produce fire retardants. Its compounds are used in medicine, and also in matches manufacturing, rubber vulcanization, china and ammunition production, as well as biomedicine, in which they are used as antiprotozoal agents and for treating tropical diseases. Antimony may occur at four oxidation states, that is, −3, +3, +4, and +5. It occurs mainly in Sb3+ and Sb5+ forms in the biological and geochemical environment. It is present in all units of the environment and its natural background in various environmental matrices is highly diversified [135]. Its content does not usually exceed 1 μg/L in clean water and 500 mg/kg in rocks. Beside its natural sources, antimony also occurs as anthropogenic pollution. More than 20,000 tonnes of this element are exploited in Japan every year, whereas, interestingly, only 100 tonnes of arsenic, which is far more toxic, are used.

Antimony speciation is especially important in environmental and clinical analytics, as it is a toxic element whose bioavailability and reactivity depend not only on the oxidation state but also on the character of its particular compounds. In general, inorganic antimony compounds are more toxic than the organic ones. Sb(III) compounds are ten times more toxic than Sb(V) ones. On the other hand, the toxicity of antimony compounds is approximately ten times lesser than arsenic ones but it depends on their oxidation states and structure. Antimony in the elemental form is more toxic than its salts [14].

The biological role of antimony has not been fully understood yet. IARC (The International Agency for Research on Cancer) has concluded that there is enough evidence obtained from animal testing to recognize Sb2O3 as a carcinogenic compound [136]. However, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [137] and German Research Community [138] categorize antimony as a main pollutant but do not indicate its carcinogenicity.

The first works relating to antimony speciation were published in the early 1980s [139]. The speciation analytics of antimony and its compounds can be divided into determination of Sb(III) and Sb(V) and organic antimony compounds. The speciation is usually performed with gas or liquid chromatography. Capillary electrophoresis methods are also used [140]. What is important in the application of gas chromatography in speciation analytics of antimony and its compounds is the fact that all of its organic compounds are gases at room temperature. Unfortunately, they are very often unstable. Sb(III) and Sb(V) compounds are reduced to SbH3, which at room temperature is a toxic gas with garlic odor.

The speciation is carried out at two stages. First, the part of the sample undergoes reduction in the presence of high pH (without concentration). In these conditions, only Sb(III) compounds are reduced. Then, the other part of the sample is reduced and the amount of Sb(V) is calculated on the basis of the difference.

Organic antimony compounds determined in the environment include, among others, monomethylated methylstibonic amid [MeSbO(OH)2], dimethylated dimethylstibinic amid [Me2SbOOH], monomethylstibine [MeSbH2], and dimethylstibine [Me2SbH] [2]. Unfortunately, they are not available in the standard form and thus are obtained for the analytical needs in laboratories. Methylated Sb(V) compounds are usually reduced to suitable Sb(III) compounds, that is, MeSbO(OH)2 to MeSbH2, Me2SbOOH to Me2SbH, and Me3SbX2 to Me3Sb.

The most significant limitation related to separation methods based on gas chromatography is the fact that only the compounds undergoing the reduction process can be determined. Another problem is that Sb(III) is unstable and it easily oxidizes to Sb(V), hence many research papers indicate relatively high Sb(V) content in the analyzed samples.

Various forms of liquid chromatography are a possible alternative as they allow simultaneous determination of Sb(III) and Sb(V) compounds. Analytes such as Sb(III), Sb(V), or Me3SbX2, are anions themselves and can be determined as ions.

The most important problems with respect to speciation analytics of antimony and its compounds encompass the following.

  1. Standards of antimony compounds are unavailable and unstable. Sb(III) and Sb(V) standards are unstable. There are no certified reference materials for antimony compounds and suitable standards are difficult to obtain in chemical reactions. Very few inorganic and gaseous Me3Sb compounds are commercially available. Only trimethylated pentavalent antimony species (Me3SbCl2, MeSbBr2, Me3SbO, Me3Sb(OH)2) are produced with suitable purity and sufficient amount.

  2. There appear problems with low and ultra-low analyte contents in the samples, especially those with complex matrices [2].

  3. There exist problems related to unsuitable peak resolution and detection. Peak tailing, especially in the case of Sb(III) peak, appears while using liquid chromatography. Sb(III) forms divalent (and sometimes trivalent) ions in water solutions that strongly react with the resin. Besides, Sb(III), Sb(V) and Me3SbX2 are similar and difficult to separate.

Antimony and its compounds are most often determined in various types of water, such as drinking, mineral, and surface water. The information on the content of different speciation forms of antimony is not ample. It usually concerns specific water bodies and rivers or soil and plants growing in particular areas. Analyses concerning antimony and its compounds contents in biomedical samples attract great attention. Analysts find the matrix of such samples (urine, living tissues) challenging. They contain a lot of proteins, macromolecular substances, and enzymes that can bind with antimony compounds and cause its oxidation or reduction. The toxic activity mechanism of these compounds has not been fully understood yet and they are employed in treatment of various diseases, including the tropical ones. The literature data concerning antimony speciation analytics with various hyphenated techniques is given in Table 2.

Table 2.

Selected examples of application of hyphenated techniques in antimony speciation.

Analytes Analytical column Mobile phase Method of separation and detection Matrix Reference
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 15 mM HNO3 HPLC- ICP-MS Plants [74]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Develosil C30-UG-5, Chemcosorb 7SAX Malonic acid, sodium, 1-butylosulfonian, ammonium citrate, methanol HPLC- ICP-MS Biological and environmental samples [35]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Hamilton PRP-X100, Dionex AS 14, AG 14 20 mM EDTA HPLC- ICP-MS Urine [75, 76]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 Phthalic acid, EDTA HPLC- ICP-MS Soil [77, 78]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM phthalic acid HPLC- ICP-MS Airborne particulate matter [79, 80]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2, TMS(OH)2 Hamilton PRP-X100, Asahipak GS520HG 10 mM TMAH HPLC-ICP-MS Airborne particulate matter [81, 82]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM phthalic acid HPLC-ICP-MS Soils [77, 78]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Hamilton PRP X-100 50 mM diammonium tartrate, 20 mM KOH IC-HG-AFS, HPLC-ICP-MS Plant extracts [83]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Silica-based solid-phase extraction cartridges Ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate SPE-ICP-MS Water [84]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP X-100 20 mM EDTA HPLC-ICP-MS Soil [85]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP X-100 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM phthalic acid HPLC-ICP-MS Thirteen fractions of airborne particulate matter [86]
Sb3+, Sb5+, Dimercaptosuccinic acid chemically modifying mesoporous titanium dioxide microcolumn Water SPE-ICP-OES Natural waters [87]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2, TMS(OH)2 Hamilton PRP-X100, Hamilton PRPX-200, Supelcosil LC-SCX, Hamilton PRP1, Phenomenex Intersil 5 ODS KH2PO4/K2HPO4 0.5–5 mM, KHCO3/K2CO3 1–50 mM, pyridine, 2,6 dicarboxylic acid (PDCA): 5–20 mM EDTA, 5–50 mM HNO3, 1–4 mM, ethylenediamine HPLC-ICP-MS, HPLC-FAAS Environmental samples [88]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Dionex AS14 2 mM NH4HCO3, 2.2–45 mM tartaric acid HPLC-ICP-MS Fish extracts [89]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Chloranilic acid (2,5-dichloro-3,6-dihy-droxy-1,4-benzoquinone) HMDE Water [90]
Sb3+, Sb5+, MMSb4+, DMSb3+, TMSb2+ Teflon tube packed with SE-30 on Chromosorb W-HP Liquid nitrogen HG-SPE-ICP-MS Surface waters [91]
Sb3+, Sb5+ 40 mM thioglycolic acid SPE-ICP-OES, SPE-ICP-MS Water, yeast extract [92]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 20 mM EDTA,
2 mM KHP
HPLC-ICP-MS Waters [93]
Sb3+, Total Sb l-cysteine, hydrochloric acid HG -AFS Herbs [94]
Sb3+, Sb5+ H2O, 0.05 M EDTA, 0.25 M H2SO4 HG -AFS Soil [95]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM phthalic acid HPLC-ICP-MS Moat water [79, 80]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 20 mM EDTA,
2 mM KHP
HPLC-ICP-MS Citrus juices Mineral water [96]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 5 mM HNO3 HPLC-ICP-MS Cell extracts [74]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Hamilton PRP-X100 20 mM EDTA,
2 mM KHP
HPLC-HG-AFS Sea water, [97]
Sb3+, Sb5+, Hamilton PRP-X100 EDTA 2–20 mM HPLC-ICP-MS, FI-HG-ICP-MS Biological samples [98]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Dionex AS15/AG15 20 mM EDTA, NH4OH, 1 mM EDTA HPLC-ICP-MS Pteris vittata samples
Sb3+, Sb5+ Microcolumn with immobilized aminoacid HCl HG-ICP-OES Urine [99]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 200 mM diammonium tartrate HPLC-HG-AFS Airborne particulate matter [100]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Hamilton PRP-X100 20 mM EDTA + 2 mM potassium hydrogen phthalate, 50 mM diammonium hydrogen phosphate HPLC-(UV)-HG-AFS Algae and mollusk extracts [101]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbO Hamilton PRP-X100 2 mM phthalic acid 2 mM 4-hydroxybenzoic acid HPLC-ICP-MS, HPLC-ICP-OES Surface water, soil extracts [102]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Hamilton PRP-X100 EDTA-K2HPO4 20 mM HPLC-HG-AFS Sediments [103]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Hamilton PRP-X100 20 mM EDTA, 8 mM KHP 1 mM K2CO3 HPLC-HG-AFS Environmental samples [104]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 250 mM diammonium tartrate, 20 mM KOH HPLC-ICP-MS Volcanic ash [105]
Sb3+, Sb5+ 1.5 M HAc, 0.5 M H2SO4 FIA-HG-AAS Biological samples [106]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 CETAC ION-120 Dionex AS 14 2 mM NH4HCO3, 1 mM tartaric acid, 1.25 mM EDTA HPLC-ICP-MS Tap water [75, 76]
Sb3+, Sb5+ 5.0∗10−5 M BPHA, Triton X-114 (0.20% (v=v)) SPE-FAAS Water [107]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Hamilton PRP-X100 20 mM EDTA, 2 mM KHP, 50 mM (NH4)2HPO4 HPLC-HG-AFS Sea water [97]
Sb3+, Total Sb HS-SDME-ETAAS Lake water, soils [108]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 Hamilton PRP-X100, Dionex AS4A-SC 12 mM tetra-methylammonium hydroxide 3 mM tetra-methylammonium hydroxide HPLC-ICP-MS Environmental samples [109]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Dionex AS 14, AG 14 2 mM ammonium hydrogen carbonate, 2.2 mM tartaric acid, 2 mM ammonium hydrogen carbonate, 45 mM tartaric acid, HPLC-ICP-MS Synthetic samples [110]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 250 mM diammonium tartrate, 20 mM KOH HPLC-HG-AFS, HPLC-ICP-MS Coal fly ash [111]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Synchropak Q300 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM phthalic acid HPLC-ICP-MS Tap water [81, 82]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Hamilton PRP-X100 20 mM EDTA, 2 mM phthalic acid HPLC-ICP-MS,
HPLC-ESI-MS
Yoghurt, juice, urine [112]
Sb3+, Sb5+ TMSbCl2 Phenomenex SAX-SB 100 mM ammonium tartrate HPLC-ICP-MS Synthetic solutions [113]
Sb3+, Sb5+, TMSbCl2 ION-120, Supelcosil SAX Hamilton PRP-X100, Dionex AS 14, Dionex AS 9 NH4HCO3, EDTA, Tartaric acid HPLC-HG-AAS Environmental samples [114]
Sb3+, Sb5+ Supelcosil LC-SAX 1 50 mM ammonium tetrate HPLC-HG-AAS Water [115]
Sb3+, Sb5+ 3 g/L L-cysteine HG-ICP-AES Spiked water samples [116]

4. Thallium

Thallium is a nonmetal from group 16 of the periodic table. It is a soft and silverish metal. It resembles lead and its surface quickly discolors due to oxidation processes when it is left in the air. It reacts with dilute strong inorganic acids (with the exception of hydrochloric acid) and displaces hydrogen out of them.

Thallium occurs at oxidation states of +1 and +3 in compounds. Tl+ cations are colorless and thallium(I) hydroxide is a soluble strong base. Tl3+ ions can exist in a solution only if its pH is close to 0. When it is higher, Tl(OH)3 precipitates [141]. Thallium compounds are highly toxic. The element is also toxic in the dust form as it oxidizes in the contact with air. Food and respiratory thallium poisonings are possible. One of the characteristic poisoning symptoms is hair loss preceded by hair follicle atrophy. Other signs include digestion disorders, pain, neuropsychiatric complications, as well as cardiovascular system damages [2]. In the past, thallium salts were often added to rodenticides.

The anthrophogenic environmental occurrence of thallium is caused by ore smelting, handling, and processing of waste products from the metallurgic industry [142]. Also, vegetation damages have been observed and researched around a cement plant using thallium-containing pyrite smelting residues [143]. Thallium occurs in the Earth crust and its mean amount equals to 0.6 mg/kg. It is also found, as a trace element, in ore seams containing sulfur and potassium compounds. Thallium(I) salts are easily absorbed through the skin and they usually enter living organisms in this way. Food is one of the important sources of thallium and its compounds. Consequently, food control monitoring is essential. Therefore, it is very important to determine sources of thallium in food and to investigate dietary intakes of this element. Thallium is widely distributed in the vegetable kingdom and is rapidly taken up by the plant root. Thus, the thallium-transfer from soils to plants should be investigated with respect to the correlation between the chemical form and the plant uptake of this element.

Thallium and its compounds are determined in urine, saliva, tissue, and blood samples in clinical analyses [144]. Thallium is a cumulative poison of high toxicity and is without taste, smell, and other warning attributes. Thallium and its compounds can enter the organism of persons working with them through the respiratory organs, through the gastrointestinal tract and through the skin. Industrial thallium poisoning can either be acute or chronic, but in all cases it is characterized by a long duration and severity of its course [142].

All results demonstrate the importance and the needs for more thallium speciation studies in different matrices, in order to obtain fundamental data for the treatment of subjects who suffer from chronic or acute thallium intoxication.

The following analytical techniques are used in the thallium analytics: atomic absorption spectrometry, coulometry, spectrophotometry, ICP-MS, laser inducted fluorescence spectrometry, or differential pulse stripping voltamperometry.

There are well-developed and described methods of antimony and arsenic analysis. On the other hand, there is a great pressure, both for the analytical chemists and toxicologists, to develop credible methodologies of thallium determination, especially in complex matrix samples. Determination of thallium and its compounds in water, snow, soil, sediments, or cement has been described in recent years [72]. Literature data concerning speciation analytics of thallium performed with various hyphenated techniques is presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Selected examples of application of hyphenated techniques in thalium speciation.

Analytes Analytical column Mobile phase Method of separation and detection Matrix Reference
Tl1+, Tl3+ Chelex-100 resin column 14% HNO3 SPE-ICP-MS, SPE-GFAAS River waters [121]
Tl1+, Tl3+ L-Tyr-CNTs 10% HNO3 SPE-STPF-ETAAS Tap waters [122]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Extraction with 1-pyrrolidinecarbodithioic acid, APDC Extraction-ETAAS Wine [123]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Triton X-114, sodium dodecyl sulfate, DTPA Extraction-ICP-MS Environmental water samples [124]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Hamilton PRP-X100 100 mM ammonium acetate, and 5 mM DTPA IC-ICP-MS Plants extracts [125]
Tl1+, Tl3+ SPE (Dowex 50-8X) 14% HNO3 SPE-ICP-MS Lake waters [126]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Microcolumn (sodium dodecyl sulfate + alumina) 1 M Na2S2O3 FI-FAAS Water end wastewater [127]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Hydrazine FIA and spectrofluorimetric Real samples [128]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Chelex-100 resin column 3.2 M HNO3 SPE-ICP-MS Lake waters [129]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Microcolumn (multiwalled carbon nanotubes) 1 M HNO3 SPE-STPF-ETAAS Water [130]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Dionex CG12A 0.015 M HNO3 IC-ICP-OES, IC-ICP-MS Water [131]
Tl1+, Tl3+ Dionex AG12A CG12A HNO3, HCl IC-ICP-MS Water [132]
Me2Tl+ Microcolumn (filled with AG1-X8) NaDDTC, HNO3, MIBK, PTI-IDMS Oceanic water [133]

5. Summary and Conclusions

Arsenic, antimony, and thallium belong to a group of elements that, due to their physical, chemical and toxicological qualities, are particularly interesting objects of research within the framework of speciation analytics. The new approach towards the presence and role of these elements and their compounds is influenced by the constant development of analytical methods (including hyphenated techniques), toxicology, biochemistry, and environmental chemistry.

Most literature data concerns arsenic and its speciation forms whereas the least information relates to thallium and its compounds. New data connected with both the characteristics of selected speciation forms of these elements and methods enabling to determine them at lower concentration levels (in the complex matrix samples, such as food ones or living tissues) ought to emerge in the years to follow.

The hyphenated techniques, in which separation techniques are coupled with diverse selective and sensitive detection methods, are widely used in the speciation analytics of arsenic, antimony, and thallium. The hyphenated techniques create new and ever greater possibilities. Their main advantages include extremely low limits of detection and quantification, insignificant influence of interferences on the determination process, as well as very high precision and repeatability of determinations. Obviously, the hyphenated techniques pose certain limitations that involve the complexity and high price of the apparatus. As a result, they are not readily available and used in laboratories. What is more, the application of the hyphenated techniques requires excellent comprehension of analytical methodologies and the apparatus. These systems are very expensive and employed in scientific research rather than in routine analyses. Nevertheless, the hyphenated techniques have been constantly developing and gaining more and more importance, which is corroborated by the rising number of works pertaining to the subject.

Abbreviations

AB:

Arsenobetaine

AC:

Arsenecholine

BPHA:

N-Benzoyl-N-phenyhydroxylamine

DMA:

Dimethylarsinic Acid

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

FIA-HGAAS:

Flow Injection Analysis coupled to Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

FIA-HG-AAS:

Flow Injection Analysis with Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption

FI-EHG-AAS:

Flow Injection Analysis coupled to Electrochemical Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

FI-HG-ICP-MS:

Flow Injection Hydride Generation with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

HG-AFS:

Hydride Generation coupled to Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry

HG-ICP-AES:

Hydride Generation Inductively coupled to Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry

HG-SPE-ICP-MS:

Solid Phase Extraction Hydride Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry

HMDE:

Hanging Mercury Drop Electrode

HPLC- INAA:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis

HPLC-DF-ICP-MS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography With Double Focusing Sector Field Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

HPLC-ESI-MS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

HPLC-ETAAS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

HPLC-FAAS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

HPLC-HGAAS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

HPLC-HG-AFS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Hydride Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry

HPLC-ICP-AES:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography Inductively coupled to Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy

HPLC-ICP-DRC-MS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Inductively Coupled to Plasma Mass Spectrometry With Dynamic Reaction Cell

HPLC-ICP-MS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

HPLC-MO-HG-AAS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography Microwave-Assisted Oven Coupled to Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

HPLC-NAA:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Neutron Activation Analysis

HPLC-SF-ICP-MS:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Sector Field Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

IC-HG-AFS:

Ion Chromatography Coupled to Hydride Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry

IC-ICP-MS:

Ion Chromatography Coupled to Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

IC-ICP-OES:

Ion Chromatography coupled to Inductively coupled to Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy

Me2Tl+:

Dimethyl Thallium Ion

MIBK:

Methyl Isobuthyl Ketone

MMA:

Monomethylarsonic Acid

NaDDTC:

Sodium Diethyldithiocarbamate

PDCA:

2,6 Dicarboxylic Acid

PTI-IDMS:

Positive Thermal Ionization Isotope Dilution Mess Spectrometry

SPE-FAAS:

Solid Phase Extraction with Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

SPE-GFAAS:

Solid Phase Extraction Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

SPE-ICP-MS:

Solid Phase Extraction With Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

SPE-ICP-OES:

Solid Phase Extraction With Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy

SPE-STPF-ETAAS:

Solid Phase Extraction Stabilized Temperature Platform Furnace With Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

TeMAs+:

Tertramethylarsonium Ion

TMAH:

Tetramethylammonium hydroxide

TMAI:

Tetramethylarsonium Iodide

TMAO:

Trimethylarsine Oxide

TMSbCl2:

Trimethylantimony Dichloride

TMSbO:

Trimethylstiboxide.

References

  • 1.Florence TM, Batley GE, Benes P. Chemical speciation in natural waters. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 1980;3:219–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Caruso JA, Sutton KL, Ackley KL. Elemental speciation, Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. Vol. 32. Elsevier Science; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kot A, Namiesńik J. The role of speciation in analytical chemistry. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2000;19(2-3):69–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tessier A, Turner DR. Metal Speciation and Bioavaliability in Aquatic Systems. New York, NY, USA: Wiley; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Florence TM, Batley GE. Chemical speciation in natural waters. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 1993;51:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Blsson M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry. 1979;51(7):844–851. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Queaviller Ph. Method Performance Studies for Speciation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry Cambridge; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dean JR. Methods for Environmental Trace Analysis. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Michalski R. Applications of ion chromatography for the determination of inorganic cations. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 2009;39(4):230–250. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ellis LA, Roberts DJ. Chromatographic and hyphenated methods for elemental speciation analysis in environmental media. Journal of Chromatography A. 1997;774(1-2):3–19. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(97)00325-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Taylor H. Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry: Practices and Techniques. London, UK: Academic Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Imran A, Aboul-Enein Y. Instrumental Methods in Metal Ion Speciation. Taylor & Francis; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vieira MA, Grinberg P, Bobeda CRR, Reyes MNM, Campos RC. Non-chromatographic atomic spectrometric methods in speciation analysis: a review. Spectrochimica Acta B. 2009;64(6):459–476. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nordberg GF, Flower BA, Nordberg M, Friberg L. Handbook of the Toxicology of Metals. 3rd edition. London, UK: Academic Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weiss J. Handbook of Ion Chromatography. 1-2. Wiley-VCH; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Michalski R. Inorganic oxyhalide by-products in drinking water: ion chromatographic methods. In: Cazes J, editor. Encyclopedia of Chromatography. Vol. 2. 2010. pp. 1212–1217. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang T. Liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LC-ICP-MS) Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies. 2007;30(5-7):807–831. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wille A, Czyborra S, Steinbach A. Hyphenated techniques in ion chromatography. LC-GC Europe. 2007;20(12):42–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Popp M, Hann S, Koellensperger G. Environmental application of elemental speciation analysis based on liquid or gas chromatography hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry—a review. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2010;668(2):114–129. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rouessac F, Rouessac A. Chemical Analysis: Modern Instrumentation Methods and Techniques. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Das AK, Guardia M, Cervera ML. Literature survey of on-line elemental speciation in aqueous solutions. Talanta. 2001;55(1):1–28. doi: 10.1016/s0039-9140(01)00400-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bednar AJ, Garbarino JR, Burkhardt MR, Ranville JF, Wildeman TR. Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis. Water Research. 2004;38(2):355–364. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Teräsahde P, Pantsar-Kallio M, Manninen PKG. Simultaneous determination of arsenic species by ion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. 1996;750(1-2):83–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Iserte LO, Roig-Navarro AF, Hernández F. Simultaneous determination of arsenic and selenium species in phosphoric acid extracts of sediment samples by HPLC-ICP-MS. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;527(1):97–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rahman MM, Chen ZL, Naidu R. Extraction of arsenic species in soils using microwave-assisted extraction detected by ion chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2009;31(1):93–102. doi: 10.1007/s10653-008-9227-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen Z, Khan NI, Owens G, Naidu R. Elimination of chloride interference on arsenic speciation in ion chromatography inductively coupled mass spectrometry using an octopole collision/reaction system. Microchemical Journal. 2007;87(1):87–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xie R, Johnson W, Spayd S, Hall GS, Buckley B. Arsenic speciation analysis of human urine using ion exchange chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2006;578(2):186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.06.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodriguez IB, Raber G, Goessler W. Arsenic speciation in fish sauce samples determined by HPLC coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry. 2009;112(4):1084–1087. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Roig-Navarro AF, Martinez-Bravo Y, López FJ, Hernández F. Simultaneous determination of arsenic species and chromium(VI) by high-performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. 2001;912(2):319–327. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)00572-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.James WD, Raghvan T, Gentry TJ, Shan G, Loeppert RH. Arsenic speciation: HPLC followed by ICP-MS or INAA. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2008;278(2):267–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Koellensperger G, Nurmi J, Hann S, Stingeder G, Fitz WJ, Wenzel WW. CE-ICP-SFMS and HPIC-ICP-SFMS for arsenic speciation in soil solution and soil water extracts. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2002;17(9):1042–1047. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gettar RT, Garavaglia RN, Gautier EA, Batistoni DA. Determination of inorganic and organic anionic arsenic species in water by ion chromatography coupled to hydride generation-inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. 2000;884(1-2):211–221. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00279-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jackson BP, Miller WP. Soluble arsenic and selenium species in fly ash/organic waste-amended soils using ion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Environmental Science and Technology. 1999;33(2):270–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pantsar-Kallio M, Manninen PKG. Simultaneous determination of toxic arsenic and chromium species in water samples by ion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. 1997;779(1-2):139–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morita Y, Kobayashi T, Kuroiwa T, Narukawa T. Study on simultaneous speciation of arsenic and antimony by HPLC-ICP-MS. Talanta. 2007;73(1):81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nam SH, Oh HJ, Min HS, Lee JH. A study on the extraction and quantitation of total arsenic and arsenic species in seafood by HPLC-ICP-MS. Microchemical Journal. 2010;95(1):20–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liang CZ, Farzana AK, Mahmudur RM, Ravendra N. The separation of arsenic species in soils and plant tissues by anion-exchange chromatography with inductively coupled mass spectrometry using various mobile phases. Microchemical Journal. 2008;89(1):20–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Daus B, Mattusch J, Wennrich R, Weiss H. Investigation on stability and preservation of arsenic species in iron rich water samples. Talanta. 2002;58(1):57–65. doi: 10.1016/s0039-9140(02)00256-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martínez-Bravo Y, Roig-Navarro AF, López FJ, Hernández F. Multielemental determination of arsenic, selenium and chromium(VI) species in water by high-performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. 2001;926(2):265–274. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mihucz VG, Tatár E, Virág I, Cseh E, Fodor F, Záray G. Arsenic speciation in xylem sap of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2005;383(3):461–466. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-3325-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sanz E, Muñoz-Olivas R, Cámara C, Sengupta MK, Ahamed S. Arsenic speciation in rice, straw, soil, hair and nails samples from the arsenic-affected areas of Middle and Lower Ganga plain. Journal of Environmental Science and Health A. 2007;42(12):1695–1705. doi: 10.1080/10934520701564178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zheng J, Hintelmann H, Dimock B, Dzurko MS. Speciation of arsenic in water, sediment, and plants of the Moira watershed, Canada, using HPLC coupled to high resolution ICP-MS. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2003;377(1):14–24. doi: 10.1007/s00216-003-1920-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liang CZ, Farzana AK, Mahmudur RM, Ravendra N. Speciation of arsenic by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using ammonium eluents. Journal of Separation Science. 2006;29(17):2671–2676. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200500304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Heitland P, Köster HD. Comparison of different medical cases in urinary arsenic speciation by fast HPLC-ICP-MS. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2009;212(4):432–438. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Raab A, Feldmann J. Arsenic speciation in hair extracts. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2005;381(2):332–338. doi: 10.1007/s00216-004-2796-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dufailly V, Guérin T, Noël L, Frémy J-M, Beauchemin D. A simple method for the speciation analysis of bio-accessible arsenic in seafood using on-line continuous leaching and ion exchange chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2008;23(9):1263–1268. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jackson BP, Bertsch PM. Determination of arsenic speciation in poultry wastes by IC-ICP-MS. Environmental Science and Technology. 2001;35(24):4868–4873. doi: 10.1021/es0107172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mandal BK, Ogra Y, Anzai K, Suzuki KT. Speciation of arsenic in biological samples. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2004;198(3):307–318. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Todorov TI, Ejnik JW, Mullick FG, Centeno JA. Arsenic speciation in urine and blood reference materials. Microchimica Acta. 2005;151(3-4):263–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hovanec BM. Arsenic speciation in commercially available peanut butter spread by IC-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2004;19(9):1141–1144. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Raab A, Hansen HR, Zhuang L, Feldmann J. Arsenic accumulation and speciation analysis in wool from sheep exposed to arsenosugars. Talanta. 2002;58(1):67–76. doi: 10.1016/s0039-9140(02)00257-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.van Hulle M, Zhang C, Zhang X, Cornelis R. Arsenic speciation in chinese seaweeds using HPLC-ICP-MS and HPLC-ES-MS. Analyst. 2002;127(5):634–640. doi: 10.1039/b110940e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pizarro I, Gómez M, Cámara C, Palacios MA. Arsenic speciation in environmental and biological samples: extraction and stability studies. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2003;495(1-2):85–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ronkart SN, Laurent V, Carbonnelle P, Mabon N, Copin A, Barthélemy J-P. Speciation of five arsenic species (arsenite, arsenate, MMAAV, DMAAV and AsBet) in different kind of water by HPLC-ICP-MS. Chemosphere. 2007;66(4):738–745. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Inoue Y, Date Y, Yoshida K, Chen H, Endo G. Speciation of arsenic compounds in the urine of rats orally exposed to dimethylarsinic acid ion chromatography with ICP-MS as an element-selective detector. Applied Organometallic Chemistry. 1996;10(9):707–711. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Caroli S, La Torre F, Petrucci F, Violante N. On-line speciation of arsenical compounds in fish and mussel extracts by HPLC-ICP-MS. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 1994;1(4):205–208. doi: 10.1007/BF02986531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kohlmeyer U, Jakubik S, Kuballa J, Jantzen E. Determination of arsenic species in fish oil after acid digestion. Microchimica Acta. 2005;151(3-4):249–255. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Karthikeyan S, Hirata S. Ion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry determination of arsenic species in marine samples. Applied Organometallic Chemistry. 2004;18(7):323–330. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Guerin T, Astruc M, Batel A, Borsier M. Multielemental speciation of As, Se, Sb and Te by HPLC-ICP-MS. Talanta. 1997;44(12):2201–2208. doi: 10.1016/s0039-9140(97)00036-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Creed PA, Schwegel CA, Creed JT. Investigation of arsenic speciation on drinking water treatment media utilizing automated sequential continuous flow extraction with IC-ICP-MS detection. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2005;7(11):1079–1084. doi: 10.1039/b507568h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kim MJ, Ahn KH, Jung Y. Distribution of arsenic species in mine tailings of abandoned mines from Korea. Chemosphere. 2004;49:p. 307. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00307-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cabon JY, Cabon N. Speciation of major arsenic species in seawater by flow injection hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2000;368(5):484–489. doi: 10.1007/s002160000526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yin X, Hoffmann E, Lüdke C. Differential determination of arsenic (III) and total arsenic with L-cysteine as prereductant using a flow injection non-dispersive atomic absorption device. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1996;355(3-4):324–326. doi: 10.1007/s0021663550324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pyell U, Dworschak A, Nitschke F, Neidhart B. Flow injection electrochemical hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (FI-EHG-AAS) as a simple device for the speciation of inorganic arsenic and selenium. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1999;363(5-6):495–498. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chausseau M, Roussel C, Gilon N, Mermet JM. Optimization of HPLC-ICP-AES for the determination of arsenic species. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2000;366(5):476–480. doi: 10.1007/s002160050096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shi Y, Acharya R, Chatt A. Speciation of arsenic in natural waters by HPLC-NAA. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2004;262(1):277–286. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shuvaeva OV, Koshcheeva OS, Beisel NF. Arsenic speciation in water by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrothermal atomic absorption detection. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2002;57(11):1037–1041. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stummeyer J, Harazim B, Wippermann T. Speciation of arsenic in water samples by high-performance liquid chromatography-hydride generation-atomic absorption spectrometry at trace levels using a post-column reaction system. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1996;354(3):344–351. doi: 10.1007/s0021663540344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Šlejkovec Z, Salma I, van Elteren JT, Zemplén-Papp É. Speciation of arsenic in coarse and fine urban aerosols using sequential extraction combined with liquid chromatography and atomic fluorescence detection. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2000;366(8):830–834. doi: 10.1007/s002160051580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chun-Gang Y, Bin H, Er-Le G, Jian X, Gui-Bin J. Evaluation of extraction methods for arsenic speciation in polluted soil and rotten ore by HPLC-HG-AFS analysis. Microchimica Acta. 2007;159(1-2):175–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Moldovan M, Gómez MM, Palacios MA, Cámara C. Arsenic speciation in water and human urine by HPLC/ICP/MS and HPLC/MO/HG/AAS. Microchemical Journal. 1998;59(1):89–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cornelis R, Crews H, Caruso J, Heumann KG. Handbook of Elemental Speciation II: species in the Environment, Food, Medicine & Occupational Health. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hites RA. Elements of Environmental Chemistry. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ulrich N, Shaked P, Zilberstein D. Speciation of antimony (III) and antimony(V) in cell extracts by anion chromatography/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2000;368(1):62–66. doi: 10.1007/s002160000441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Krachler M, Emons H. Speciation analysis of antimony by high-performance liquid chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using ultrasonic nebulization. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2001;429(1):125–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Krachler M, Emons H. Urinary antimony speciation by HPLC-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2001;16(1):20–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Amereih S, Meisel T, Kahr E, Wegscheider W. Speciation analysis of inorganic antimony in soil using HPLC-ID-ICP-MS. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2005;383(7-8):1052–1059. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-0049-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Amereih S, Meisel T, Scholger R, Wegscheider W. Antimony speciation in soil samples along two Austrian motorways by HPLC-ID-ICP-MS. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2005;7(12):1200–1206. doi: 10.1039/b510321e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zheng J, Iijima A, Furuta N. Complexation effect of antimony compounds with citric acid and its application to the speciation of antimony(III) and antimony(V) using HPLC-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2001;16(8):812–818. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zheng J, Iijima A, Furuta N. Complexation effect of antimony compounds with citric acid and its application to the speciation of antimony(III) and antimony(V) using HPLC-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2001;16(8):812–818. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zheng J, Ohata M, Furuta N. Studies on the speciation of inorganic and organic antimony compounds in airborne particulate matter by HPLC-ICP-MS. Analyst. 2000;125(6):1025–1028. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zheng J, Ohata M, Furuta N. Antimony speciation in environmental samples by using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Analytical Sciences. 2000;16(1):75–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Miravet R, Bonilla E, López-Sánchez JF, Rubio R. Antimony speciation in terrestrial plants. Comparative studies on extraction methods. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2005;7(12):1207–1213. doi: 10.1039/b509115b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yu C, Ca Q, Guo ZX, Yang Z, Khoo SB. Antimony speciation by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using solid phase extraction cartridges. Analyst. 2002;127(10):1380–1385. doi: 10.1039/b206829j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Telford K, Maher W, Krikowa F, Foster S. Measurement of total antimony and antimony species in mine contaminated soils by ICPMS and HPLC-ICPMS. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2008;10(1):136–140. doi: 10.1039/b715465h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Iijima A, Sato K, Ikeda T, Sato H, Kozawa K, Furuta N. Concentration distributions of dissolved Sb(III) and Sb(V) species in size-classified inhalable airborne particulate matter. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2010;25(3):356–363. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Huang C, Hu B, Jiang Z. Simultaneous speciation of inorganic arsenic and antimony in natural waters by dimercaptosuccinic acid modified mesoporous titanium dioxide micro-column on-line separation and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry determination. Spectrochimica Acta B. 2007;62(5):454–460. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lintschinger J, Koch I, Serves S, Feldmann J, Cullen WR. Determination of antimony species with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography using element specific detection. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1997;359(6):484–491. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lindemann T, Prange A, Dannecker W, Neidhart B. Stability studies of arsenic, selenium, antimony and tellurium species in water, urine, fish and soil extracts using HPLC/ICP-MS. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2000;368(2-3):214–220. doi: 10.1007/s002160000475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wagner W, Sander S, Henze G. Trace analysis of antimony (III) and antimony (V) by adsorptive stripping voltammetry. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1996;354(1):11–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ellwood MJ, Maher WA. Arsenic and antimony species in surface transects and depth profiles across a frontal zone: the Chatham Rise, New Zealand. Deep-Sea Research I. 2002;49(11):1971–1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Marcellino S, Attar H, Barbier F, Lagarde F. Heat-treated Saccharomyces cerevisiae for antimony speciation and antimony(III) preconcentration in water samples. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2008;629:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Liu F, Le XC, McKnight-Whitford A, et al. Antimony speciation and contamination of waters in the Xikuangshan antimony mining and smelting area, China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2010;32(5):401–413. doi: 10.1007/s10653-010-9284-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sun HW, Qiao FX, Suo R, Li LX, Liang SX. Simultaneous determination of trace arsenic(III), antimony(III), total arsenic and antimony in Chinese medicinal herbs by hydride generation-double channel atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;505(2):255–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Fuentes E, Pinochet H, de Gregori I, Potin-Gautier M. Redox speciation analysis of antimony in soil extracts by hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochimica Acta B. 2003;58(7):1279–1289. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hansen HR, Pergantis SA. Detection of antimony species in citrus juices and drinking water stored in PET containers. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2006;21(8):731–733. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.de Gregori I, Quiroz W, Pinochet H, Pannier F, Potin-Gautier M. Simultaneous speciation analysis of Sb(III), Sb(V) and (CH3)3SbCl2 by high performance liquid chromatography-hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry detection (HPLC-HG-AFS): application to antimony speciation in sea water. Journal of Chromatography A. 2005;1091(1-2):94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Miekeley N, Mortari SR, Schubach AO. Monitoring of total antimony and its species by ICP-MS and on-line ion chromatography in biological samples from patients treated for leishmaniasis. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2002;372(3):495–502. doi: 10.1007/s00216-001-1213-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pacheco PH, Gil RA, Martinez LD, Polla G, Smichowski P. A fully automated system for inorganic antimony preconcentration and speciation in urine. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2007;603(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bellido-Martín A, Gómez-Ariza JL, Smichowsky P, Sánchez-Rodas D. Speciation of antimony in airborne particulate matter using ultrasound probe fast extraction and analysis by HPLC-HG-AFS. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2009;649(2):191–195. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.de Gregori I, Quiroz W, Pinochet H, Pannier F, Potin-Gautier M. Speciation analysis of antimony in marine biota by HPLC-(UV)-HG-AFS: extraction procedures and stability of antimony species. Talanta. 2007;73(3):458–465. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ulrich N. Speciation of antimony(III), antimony(V) and trimethylstiboxide by ion chromatography with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometric and mass spectrometric detection. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1998;359(3):245–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Potin-Gautier M, Pannier F, Quiroz W, Pinochet H, de Gregori I. Antimony speciation analysis in sediment reference materials using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2005;553(1-2):214–222. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Viñas P, López-García I, Merino-Meroño B, Hernández-Córdoba M. Liquid chromatography-hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry hybridation for antimony speciation in environmental samples. Talanta. 2006;68(4):1401–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.07.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Miravet R, López-Sánchez JF, Rubio R, Smichowski P, Polla G. Speciation analysis of antimony in extracts of size-classified volcanic ash by HPLC-ICP-MS. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2007;387(5):1949–1954. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-1077-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Petit de Pen Y, Vielma O, Burguera JL, Burguera M, Rondo C, Carrero P. On-line determination of antimony(III) and antimony(V) in liver tissue and whole blood by flow injection—hydride generation—atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta. 2001;55(4):743–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Fan Z. Speciation analysis of antimony (III) and antimony (V) by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after separation/preconcentration with cloud point extraction. Microchimica Acta. 2005;152(1-2):29–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Pena-Pereira F, Lavilla I, Bendicho C. Headspace single-drop microextraction with in situ stibine generation for the determination of antimony (III) and total antimony by electrothermal-atomic absorption spectrometry. Microchimica Acta. 2009;164(1-2):77–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lintschinger J, Schramel O, Kettrup A. The analysis of antimony species by using ESI-MS and HPLC-ICP-MS. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1998;361(2):96–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lindemann T, Prange A, Dannecker W, Neidhart B. Simultaneous determination of arsenic, selenium and antimony species using HPLC/ICP-MS. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1999;364(5):462–466. doi: 10.1007/s002160000475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Miravet R, López-Sánchez JF, Rubio R. Leachability and analytical speciation of antimony in coal fly ash. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2006;576(2):200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hansen HR, Pergantis SA. Identification of Sb(V) complexes in biological and food matrixes and their stibine formation efficiency during hydride generation with ICPMS detection. Analytical Chemistry. 2007;79(14):5304–5311. doi: 10.1021/ac070130r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Nash MJ, Maskall JE, Hill SJ. Developments with anion exchange stationary phases for HPLC-ICP-MS analysis of antimony species. Analyst. 2006;131(6):724–730. doi: 10.1039/b600155f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Krachler M, Emons H. Potential of high performance liquid chromatography coupled to flow injection hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry for the speciation of inorganic and organic antimony compounds. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2000;15(3):281–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zhang X, Cornelis R, Mees L. Speciation of antimony(III) and antimony(V) species by using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 1998;13(3):205–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Feng YL, Narasaki H, Chen HY, Tian LC. Speciation of antimony(III) and antimony(V) using hydride generation inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry combined with the rate of pre-reduction of antimony. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1999;386(3):297–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Hymer CB, Caruso JA. Arsenic and its speciation analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. 2004;1045(1-2):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zhang H, Wang YF, Shi YZ, Chen YH. Application of high performance liquid chromatography and hyphenated techniques in analysis of arsenic species. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis. 2007;27(2):386–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Butcher DJ. Environmental applications of arsenic speciation using atomic spectrometry detection. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews. 2007;42(1):1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Imran A, Chakresh KJ. Advances in arsenic speciation techniques. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2004;84(12):947–964. [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Lin TS, Nriagu JO. Thallium speciation in river waters with Chelex-100 resin. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1999;395(3):301–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pacheco PH, Gil RA, Smichowski P, Polla G, Martinez LD. l-Tyrosine immobilized on multiwalled carbon nanotubes: A new substrate for thallium separation and speciation using stabilized temperature platform furnace-electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2009;656(1-2):36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Cvetković J, Arpadjan S, Karadjova I, Stafilov T. Determination of thallium in wine by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry after extraction preconcentration. Spectrochimica Acta B. 2002;57(6):1101–1106. [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Meeravali NN, Jiang SJ. Ultra-trace speciation analysis of thallium in environmental water samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after a novel sequential mixed-micelle cloud point extraction. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2008;23(4):555–560. [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Krasnodȩbska-Ostrȩga B, Asztemborska M, Golimowski J, Strusińska K. Determination of thallium forms in plant extracts by anion exchange chromatography with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection (IC-ICP-MS) Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2008;23(12):1632–1635. [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Lin TS, Nriagu J. Thallium speciation in the Great Lakes. Environmental Science and Technology. 1999;33(19):3394–3397. [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Dadfarnia S, Assadollahi T, Haji Shabani AM. Speciation and determination of thallium by on-line microcolumn separation/preconcentration by flow injection-flame atomic absorption spectrometry using immobilized oxine as sorbent. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007;148(1-2):446–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Ensafi AA, Rezaei B. Speciation of thallium by flow-injection analysis with spectrofluorimetric detection. Microchemical Journal. 1998;60(1):75–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Twining BS, Twiss MR, Fisher NS. Oxidation of thallium by freshwater plankton communities. Environmental Science and Technology. 2003;37(12):2720–2726. doi: 10.1021/es026145i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Gil RA, Pacheco PH, Smichowski P, Olsina RA, Martinez LD. Speciation analysis of thallium using electrothermal AAS following on-line pre-concentration in a microcolumn filled with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Microchimica Acta. 2009;167(3-4):187–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Coetzee PP, Fischer JL, Hu M. Simultaneous separation and determination of Tl(I) and Tl(III) by IC-ICP-OES and IC-ICP-MS. Water SA. 2003;29(1):17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Karlsson U, Düker A, Karlsson S. Separation and quantification of Tl(I) and Tl(III) in fresh water samples. Journal of Environmental Science and Health A. 2006;41(7):1155–1167. doi: 10.1080/10934520600655747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Schedlbauer OF, Heumann KG. Development of an isotope dilution mass spectrometric method for dimethylthallium speciation and first evidence of its existence in the ocean. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71(24):5459–5464. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Gebel T. Aresnic and antimony: comparative approach on mechanistic toxicology. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 1997;107(3):131–144. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(97)00087-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Smichowski P. Antimony in the environment as a global pollutant: a review on analytical methodologies for its determination in atmospheric aerosols. Talanta. 2008;75(1):2–14. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Summary & Evaluations, http://www.inchem.org/documents/ukpids/ukpids/ukpid38.htm.
  • 137.US Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Pisk Information System (IRS) on Antymony, National Centem for Environmental Assessement, Office of Research and Developments, Washington, DC, 1999.
  • 138.Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Analysis of Hazardous Substances in Biological Materials. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Andreae MO. The determination of the chemical species of some of the “hydride elements” (arsenic, antimony, tin, and germanium) in seawater: methodology and results. In: Wong CS, Boyle E, Bruland K, Berton JD, Goldberg ED, editors. Trace Metals in Seawater. New York, NY, USA: Plenum; 1983. pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Michalke B, Schramel P. Antimony speciation in environmental samples by interfacing capillary electrophoresis on-line to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. Journal of Chromatography A. 1999;834(1-2):341–348. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00653-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Manahan SE. Introduction to Chemistry: Fundamentals of Environmental Chemistry. Boca Raton, Fla, USA: CRC Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Kemper FH, Bertman HP. Thallium. In: Merian E, editor. Metals and Their Compounds in the Environment: Occurrence, Analysis and Biological Relevance. Chapter II.29. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 1991. pp. 1227–1241. [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Prinz B, Krause GHM, Stratmann H. Thallium damages in the surroundings of the Dyckerhoff cement works in Lengerich, Westphalia. Staub, Reinhaltung der Luft. 1979;39(12):457–462. [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Shibamoto T, Dekker M. Chromatographic Analysis of Environmental and Food Toxicants. 3rd edition. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Scientific World Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES