Abstract
The development of a general 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay for rapid evaluation of GT activity is described. The 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay offers submicromolar sensitivity, compatibility with both purified enzymes and crude cell extracts, and exquisite selectivity for nucleoside diphosphates over the corresponding NDP-sugars. Thus, the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay is anticipated to offer broad applicability in the context of GT engineering and characterization.
Keywords: glycosyltransferase, enzyme, evolution, engineering, carbohydrate, sugar nucleotide
Complex carbohydrates are found in a wide range of biomolecules in cells, including polysaccharides, proteoglycans, glycolipids, glycoproteins, and antibodies. They play important roles in a number of biological processes such as cell growth, cell-cell interactions [1], immune response [2], inflammation [3], and viral and parasitic infections [4]. The attachment of carbohydrates to the biomolecules is catalyzed by glycosyltransferases (GTs) which transfer a monosaccharide unit from a nucleotide or lipid sugar donor to acceptor substrates in a regio- and stereospecific manner. Given the importance of carbohydrates in biology and medicine, the development of methods for glycan synthesis and modification remains a major focus of research [5-8].
While both chemical and enzymatic methods have been developed for glycan synthesis, enzymatic processes are often advantageous due to both their efficiency as well as their stringent regio- and stereochemical control [9, 10]. However, the lack of availability of suitable glycosyltransferases (GTs), and/or the requisite sugar nucleotide donors [11], for targeted glycosyl-bond formation often restricts the alternative application of enzymes. Thus, technologies to enable the generation of tailor-made GTs, either via rational design and/or directed evolution [10, 12], are anticipated to greatly augment the utility of GTs in this regard. Although there are recent examples in which GTs were successfully evolved to modulate their substrate specificity [13-15], in all cases the corresponding assays were developed for a specific acceptor. While other GT assays, including radiochemical assays, immunological assays, pH-based assays, or phosphatase-coupled assays exist [16, 17, 18], each has limits in the context of high throughput screening. In this study, we describe the development of a truly general fluorescence-based GT assay, based upon a xanthene-based Zn(II) complex nucleoside diphosphate chemosensor [19]. Given this 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay is highly sensitive, is compatible with both purified enzymes or crude extracts, and relies upon a sensor for the general leaving group of most Leloir-type GT-catalyzed reactions, the assay is anticipated to have broader applicability.
Materials and methods
Unless otherwise specified, all chemicals and enzymes were reagent grade or better obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and were used without further purification. Recombinant Streptomyces antibioticus wild-type oleandomycin glycosyltransferase (OleD) and corresponding mutants (OleD-ASP, OleD-AIP and OleD-TDP16) were produced and purified as described previously [14, 20, 21]. Absorbance readings were performed on a Beckman Coulter DU 800 spectrophotometer (Fullerton, CA, USA) and fluorescence was measured by a BMG Labtech FLUOstar Optima plate reader (microtiter plate scale, Durham, NC, USA). Mass spectrometric data were obtained on either a Waters (Milford, MA) LCT time-of-flight spectrometer for electrospray ionization (ESI) or a Varian ProMALDI (Palo Alto, CA) Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (FTICR) equipped with a 7.0 T actively-shielded superconducting magnet and a Nd:YAG laser.
Preparation of ligand 1
Ligand 1 was prepared as previously described without modifications starting from orcinol and ethyl orsellinate [19, 22, 23].
TDP binding assay
Complex 1-2Zn(II) stock solution was prepared by dissolving ligand 1 (2.5 mM) and ZnCl2 (6.3 mM, 2.5 equivalent) in 10 mM HCl. The 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay solution was prepared by adding the complex stock solution (10 μL) to the assay buffer (10 mL) containing 50% methanol in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2. TDP or TDP-Glc at different concentrations (0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.31, 0.62, 1.25, 2.50, 5.00, 10.00 μM, final concentrations) was added to the assay solution (200 μL, final volume) in a 96 well plate and the fluorescence was measured at 520 nm with excitation at 485 nm. The dissociation constant was obtained by calculating the free TDP concentration at which ΔF/ΔFmax equals 0.5 (ΔF, fluorescence intensity change; ΔFmax, maximum fluorescence intensity change).
Enzyme assays
Representative GT (wtOleD or OleD variants, 1 μM final concentration) was added to the reaction buffer containing 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM TDP-Glc, 1 mM 4-MU and 1 mM MgCl2, and the mixture incubated at room temperature. For each GT activity determination, an aliquot of the GT reaction mixture (5 μL) was added to the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay solution (195 μL) and the fluorescence was measured at 520 nm as described for the TDP binding assay.
The corresponding 4-MU fluorescence assay (where 4-MU glycosylation directly correlates to a reduction in 4-MU fluorescence) was conducted as previously described [14, 24]. Briefly, for this study the GT reaction mixture (10 μL) was added to 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0, 990 μL) and the fluorescence was measured at 460 nm with excitation at 355 nm.
Crude cell extract assays
Cells from OleD-expressing bacterial cell cultures (25 mL) were harvested by centrifugation (4000 rpm) and frozen at −80 °C. The frozen cell pellets were thawed on ice, resuspended in the lysis buffer (2 mL) containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), lysozyme (1 mg/mL, 50 kU/mL) and benzonaze (125 U/mL, Novagen, San Diego, CA, USA, Cat# 70746-3), and incubated on ice for 1 hour. Removal of the cell debris by centrifugation (12,000 rpm) afforded crude cell extracts. OleD assays with crude cell extracts were carried out as described for the assays with purified enzymes by adding crude cell extracts (1 μL for 100 μL reaction, 1%) instead of purified enzymes to the reaction buffer. A Z factor for the assay containing TDP16 at 100 min was calculated by using the equation, Z = 1 − (3σs + 3σc)/|μs − μs| where σs and σc are denoted for the standard deviations of the sample signal and control signal, and μs and μs for the means of the sample signal and control signal [25].
OleD Kinetics
Kinetics were performed with constant concentrations of OleD-TDP16 (1 μM) and TDP-Glc (1 mM) in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 1 mM MgCl2 while varying 4-MU concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 mM). TDP production was assessed using the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay at 20, 60, 180 seconds by fluorescence change at 520 nm. Initial reaction velocities, obtained as the slope of best fit to the initial linear portion of the reaction time course, were subsequently fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation.
Results and discussion
Given nearly all LeLoir GT-catalyzed reactions produce NDP as a product, a sensitive NDP sensor would be advantageous for the development of a general GT assay strategy. Among the fluorescence-based NDP sensors that have been developed for biochemical applications [19, 26, 27], the xanthene-based Zn(II) complex [Fig. 1, 1-Zn(II)] offers both high sensitivity and selectivity for NDP over NDP-sugar (the requisite GT substrate). The complex contains two sites of 2,2′-dipicolylamine-Zn(II) and xanthene as a fluorescent sensing unit for nucleoside polyphosphates. This chemosensor selectively senses nucleoside di- or triphosphates with a large fluorescence enhancement (F/Fo > 15) and strong binding affinity (about 1 μM of apparent dissociation constant, K’d), whereas no detectable fluorescence change is induced by monophosphate species, NDP-sugars or various other anions. Therefore we expected the complex 1-Zn(II) could serve as enabling feature for the development of a general NDP sensor-based GT assay.
Fig. 1.
Schematic illustration of the NDP sensing mechanism of 1-2Zn(II).
The xanthene-based ligand 1 was prepared as previously described starting from the commercially available compounds, orcinol and ethyl orsellinate [19, 22, 23]. To test the feasibility of 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay in the context of a GT assay, the well-studied macrolide-inactivating GT from S. antibioticus (OleD) was selected as a model system [14, 20, 21, 28]. As a first step, the binding affinity of 1-Zn(II) to TDP-Glc and TDP, the OleD substrate and product, respectively, was assessed in a 96-well plate format (Fig. 2). As anticipated, the large fluorescence increase at 520 nm directly correlated with an increase of [TDP] while increasing [TDP-Glc] had no effect. Thus, this standard analysis confirmed the complex to provide submicromolar sensitivity and cleanly distinguish between NDP and NDP-sugar [19], providing the selectivity (TDP K’d = 0.44 μM) and sensitivity required for a general GT assay.
Fig. 2.
Fluorescence intensity change of 1-2Zn(II) with different concentrations of TDP (◆) and TDP-Glc (■). Each data point represents an average based upon assays conducted in triplicate. Measurement conditions: 50% methanol in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 2.5 μM ligand 1, 6.3 μM ZnCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, excitation at 485 nm, emission at 520 nm.
Next, the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay was applied to an in vitro GT assay containing purified enzymes. OleD-WT and three GT variants which display different proficiencies (ASP, AIP, TDP16 [14, 20, 21]) were employed as a representative GT series with TDP-Glc and 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) serving as the glycosyl donor and acceptor, respectively. Notably, the established order of 4-MU/TDP-Glc turnover across this series was TDP16 > ASP > AIP with no conversion expected using WT [14, 20, 21]. Consistent with this, an enzyme-dependent and time-dependent increase of fluorescence was observed which directly correlates to the variant efficiency of NDP production (and corresponding glucosyltransfer) among the series of reactions evaluated (Fig. 3). As expected, controls lacking enzyme, NDP-sugar or acceptor also lacked Δfluorescence. As further confirmation, the validated quenching of 4-MU fluorescence upon 4-MU 7-O-glucosylation measured in parallel at 460 nm with excitation at 355 nm (Fig. 3) [14], revealed an identical trend of catalyst proficiency to that determined by the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay. For the most active variant TDP16, steady state kinetic parameters were also determined using the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay in a 96-well plate format (Fig. S1). Saturation was observed by varying 4-MU at a fixed concentration of TDP-Glc (1 mM) to provide an apparent KM of 0.24 ± 0.011 mM and kcat of 12.3 ± 0.45 min−1 (kcat/KM = 51 mM−1 min−1) and these parameters are comparable to those previously determined via a discontinuous HPLC assay for TDP16 [21].
Fig. 3.
GT assay results for OleD-WT and variants by 1-2Zn(II) (top) and 4-MU (bottom). Fluorescence was measured at 520 nm with excitation at 485 nm for 1-2Zn(II) and at 460 nm with excitation at 355 nm for 4-MU. Each data point represents an average based upon assays conducted in triplicate. GT reaction conditions: 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM TDP-Glc, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM 4-MU, 1 μM OleD, room temperature; (+), in the presence of 4-MU; (-), in the absence of 4-MU; the control contains no enzyme. Assay conditions: for 1-2Zn(II), 5 μL of the GT reaction mixture was added to 195 μL of the assay solution containing 50% methanol in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 2.5 μM ligand 1, 6.3 μM ZnCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2; for 4-MU, 10 μL of the GT reaction mixture was added to 990 μL of 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0).
Finally, to assess the high throughput applicability of 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay, we examined crude extract compatiblity. Specifically, the plate-based 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay was applied to crude cell extracts from OleD-expressing cells (E. coli BL21). Each cell extract for the four OleD variants was added to the reaction mixture containing TDP-Glc and 4-MU, and the mixture was transferred to the assay solution in a 96-well plate and the fluorescence was measured at 520 nm with excitation at 485 nm (Fig. 4). Based upon this analysis, the observed crude extract reactivity trends were identical prior assessments using homogenous catalysts. Importantly, this study clearly demonstrates the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay to be fully compatible with crude extract analyses as controls lacking expressed GT or less active GT displayed little to no detectable background signal (a Z factor of 0.82 was determined for the assay containing TDP16 at 100 min [25]). In addition, this study clearly demonstrates the ability of the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay, even in a plate-based crude extract format, to distinguish among a range GT mutants which display differing proficiencies.
Fig. 4.
GT assay results with crude cell extracts from OleD WT and variants expressing cells by 1-2Zn(II). Fluorescence was measured at 520 nm with excitation at 485 nm. Each data point represents an average based upon assays conducted in triplicate. GT reaction conditions: 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM TDP-Glc, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM 4-MU, 1 % crude cell extracts (1 μL for 100 μL GT reaction), room temperature; (+), in the presence of 4-MU; (-), in the absence of 4-MU; the blank contains the cell extract from a blank vector expression. Assay conditions: 5 μL of the GT reaction mixture was added to 195 μL of the assay solution containing 50% methanol in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 2.5 μM ligand 1, 6.3 μM ZnCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2.
In conclusion, a general 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor assay has been developed for rapid evaluation of GT activity. The assay as described is sensitive, amenable to both purified enzymes and crude cell extracts, and, given the 1-Zn(II) NDP sensor selectivity for all five nucleoside diphosphates (K’d < 1 μM for ADP, TDP, UDP, GDP or CDP [19]) over the corresponding NDP-sugars (K’d > 20 μM), is anticipated to offer broad applicability.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by funding from the NIH (AI52218) and the Laura and Edward Kremers Chair in Natural Products Chemistry (J.S.T.).
Abbreviations used
- GT
glycosyltransferase
- OleD
oleandomycin glucosyltransferase
- WT
wild type
- TDP
thymidine diphosphate
- TDP-Glc
thymidine 5′-diphospho-α-d-glucose
- 4-MU
4-methylumbelliferone
- UDP
uridine diphosphate
- ADP
adenosine diphosphate
- CDP
cytidine diphosphate
- GDP
guanosine diphosphate
- NDP
nucleoside diphosphate
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- [1].Crocker PR, Feizi T. Carbohydrate recognition systems: Functional triads in cell-cell interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1996;6:679–691. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80036-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Rudd PM, Pauline M, Elliott T, Cresswell P, Wilson IA, Dwek RA. Glycosylation and the immune system. Science. 2001;291:2370–2376. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5512.2370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Lowe JB. Glycan-dependent leukocyte adhesion and recruitment in inflammation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2003;15:531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Sacks D, Kamhawi S. Molecular aspects of parasite-vector and vector-host interactions in leishmaniasis. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2001;55:453–483. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Seeberger PH, Werz DB. Synthesis and medical applications of oligosaccharides. Nature. 2007;446:1046–1051. doi: 10.1038/nature05819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Hoelemann A, Seeberger PH. Carbohydrate diversity: synthesis of glycoconjugates and complex carbohydrates. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004;15:615–622. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Pratt MR, Bertozzi CR. Synthetic glycopeptides and glycoproteins as tools for biology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005;34:58–68. doi: 10.1039/b400593g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Davis BG. Sugars and proteins: New strategies in synthetic biology. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009;81:285–298. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Boons G-J. Recent developments in chemical oligosaccharide synthesis. Contemp. Org. Synth. 1996;3:173–200. [Google Scholar]
- [10].Wagner GK, Pesnot T, Field RA. A survey of chemical methods for sugar-nucleotide synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009;26:1172–1194. doi: 10.1039/b909621n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Williams GJ, Gantt RW, Thorson JS. The impact of enzyme engineering upon natural product glycodiversification. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008;12:556–564. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Yang G, Withers SG. Ultra high-throughput FACS-based screening for directed enzyme evolution. ChemBioChem. 2009;10:2704–2715. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Aharoni A, Thieme K, Chiu CP, Buchini S, Lairson LL, Chen H, Strynadka NC, Wakarchuk WW, Withers SG. High-throughput screening methodology for the directed evolution of glycosyltransferases. Nat. Methods. 2006;3:609–614. doi: 10.1038/nmeth899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Williams GJ, Zhang C, Thorson JS. Expanding the promiscuity of a natural product glycosyltransferase by directed evolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007;10:657–662. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Lairson LL, Watts AG, Wakarchuk WW, Withers SG. Using substrate engineering to harness enzymatic promiscuity and expand biological catalysis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006;12:724–728. doi: 10.1038/nchembio828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Palcic MM, Sujino K. Assays for glycosyltransferases, Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 2001;72:361–370. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Wagner GK, Pesnot T. Glycosyltransferases and their Assays. ChemBioChem. 2010;11:1939–1949. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Wu ZL, Ethen CM, Prather B, Machacek M, Jiang W. Universal phosphatase-coupled glycosyltransferase assay. Glycobiology. 2011;21:727–733. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwq187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Ojida A, Takashima I, Kohira T, Nonaka H, Hamachi I. Turn-On Fluorescence Sensing of Nucleoside Polyphosphate Using a Xanthene-Based Zn(II) Complex Chemosensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:12095–12101. doi: 10.1021/ja803262w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Williams GJ, Goff RD, Zhang C, Thorson JS. Optimizing glycosyltransferase specificity via “Hot Spot” saturation mutagenesis presents a catalyst for novobiocin glycorandomization. Chem. Biol. 2008;15:393–401. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Williams GJ, Yang J, Zhang C, Thorson JS. Recombinant E. coli prototype strains for in vivo glycorandomization. ACS Chem. Biol. 2011;6:95–100. doi: 10.1021/cb100267k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Hendrickson JB, Ramsay MVJ, Kelly TR. A New Synthesis of depsidones. Diploicin and gangaleoidin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972;94:6834–6843. [Google Scholar]
- [23].Ojida A, Nonaka H, Miyahara Y, Tamaru S, Sada K, Hamachi I. Bis(dpa-ZnII) appended xanthone: excitation ratiometric chemosensor for phosphate anions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:5518–5521. doi: 10.1002/anie.200601315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Williams GJ, Thorson JS. A high-throughput fluorescence-based glycosyltransferase screen and its application in directed evolution. Nat. Protocols. 2008;3:357–362. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Zhang J-H, Chung TDY, Oldenburg KR. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol. Screen. 1999;4:67–73. doi: 10.1177/108705719900400206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Chen X, Jou MJ, Yoon J. An “Off-On” Type UTP/UDP Selective Fluorescent Probe and Its Application to Monitor Glycosylation Process. Org. Lett. 2009;11:2181–2184. doi: 10.1021/ol9004849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Vial L, Dumy P. Fluorescent ADP Sensing in Physiological Conditions Based on Cooperative Inhibition of a Miniature Esterase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:4884–4885. doi: 10.1021/ja070734c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Gantt RW, Williams GJ, Thorson JS. Probing the aglycon promiscuity of an engineered glycosyltransferase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:8889–8892. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




