Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2012 Apr 25;109(19):7433–7438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109036109

Anabolic action of parathyroid hormone regulated by the β2-adrenergic receptor

Ryo Hanyu a,b,c,1, Vanessa L Wehbi d,1, Tadayoshi Hayata a,c,1, Shuichi Moriya a,b,1, Timothy N Feinstein d, Yoichi Ezura a,c, Masashi Nagao a,b, Yoshitomo Saita a,b, Hiroaki Hemmi a,c,e, Takuya Notomi a,c, Tetsuya Nakamoto a,c, Ernestina Schipani f, Shu Takeda c, Kazuo Kaneko b, Hisashi Kurosawa b, Gerard Karsenty g, Henry M Kronenberg f, Jean-Pierre Vilardaga d,2, Masaki Noda a,c,e,h,i,2
PMCID: PMC3358909  PMID: 22538810

Abstract

Parathyroid hormone (PTH), the major calcium-regulating hormone, and norepinephrine (NE), the principal neurotransmitter of sympathetic nerves, regulate bone remodeling by activating distinct cell-surface G protein-coupled receptors in osteoblasts: the parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor (PTHR) and the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), respectively. These receptors activate a common cAMP/PKA signal transduction pathway mediated through the stimulatory heterotrimeric G protein. Activation of β2AR via the sympathetic nervous system decreases bone formation and increases bone resorption. Conversely, daily injection of PTH (1–34), a regimen known as intermittent (i)PTH treatment, increases bone mass through the stimulation of trabecular and cortical bone formation and decreases fracture incidences in severe cases of osteoporosis. Here, we show that iPTH has no osteoanabolic activity in mice lacking the β2AR. β2AR deficiency suppressed both iPTH-induced increase in bone formation and resorption. We showed that the lack of β2AR blocks expression of iPTH-target genes involved in bone formation and resorption that are regulated by the cAMP/PKA pathway. These data implicate an unexpected functional interaction between PTHR and β2AR, two G protein-coupled receptors from distinct families, which control bone formation and PTH anabolism.

Keywords: bone anabolism, bone cells


Osteoporosis, a severe bone disorder and one of the most representative age-related diseases in the modern world, reduces bone strength and increases fracture risks associated with morbidity. The N-terminal fragment of the parathyroid hormone [PTH(1–34)], sold under the name Forteo (Lilly), is the only anabolic drug to date that can increase bone mass in humans and animals (14). Previous studies showed that PTH(1–34) treatment reduces the risk of fracture by ∼65% in osteoporotic patients (57). So far, the use of PTH(1–34) has been limited to severe cases of osteoporosis and for a period of only 18 or 24 mo because of the potential risks of osteosarcoma and hypercalcemia, as observed in rat studies (8). To further overcome these limitations, a precise understanding of the physiological, cellular, and molecular bases of the anabolic action of PTH on bone is necessary.

PTH directly acts on bone and kidney, and indirectly on intestine, to regulate calcium ion (Ca2+) levels in the blood and extracellular fluids. In the kidney, PTH induces expression of the 1-α-hydroxylase by acting on proximal tubules, which, in turn, increases the active form of vitamin D (1-α-25 dihydroxy vitamin D3) involved in calcium reabsorption from the intestine. In bone, PTH acts on osteoblasts (bone-forming cells) to increase bone formation and induces expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), a cytokine that stimulates development and activation of osteoclasts (bone-resorbing cells), which, in turn, enhances calcium release from bone. PTH binds to the PTH receptor type 1 (PTHR), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) predominantly expressed in osteoblasts and in distal and proximal renal tubules among other tissues (e.g., vascular smooth muscles, T lymphocytes). Previous genetic studies showed that the sympathetic tone reduces bone mass by suppressing bone formation and by enhancing bone resorption via activation of the β2AR expressed in osteoblasts (9, 10). Given that β2AR and PTHR are both coexpressed in osteoblastic cells (11), we hypothesize that PTH actions on bone might be modulated by the presence of the sympathetic system. Here, we examined this hypothesis by comparing the effects of intermittent injection of PTH (1–34) on bone metabolism in wild-type (WT) mice and in β2AR-deficient mice (β2AR-KO). We found that β2AR deficiency suppressed the osteoanabolic action of PTH by blocking expression of intermittent (i)PTH-target genes involved in osteoblast activity and bone formation. We further found that iPTH treatment-induced increase in bone mass in aged osteoporotic mice is blunted by β2AR deficiency.

Results

β2AR Is Necessary for the Osteoanabolic Action of PTH.

WT mice subjected to intermittent PTH(1–34) treatment (noted thereafter iPTH) showed an increase in the trabecular content compared with the control (untreated) group (WT) (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the trabecular content remained unchanged in mice lacking the β2AR (β2AR-KO) after iPTH treatment (β2AR-KO) (Fig. 1A), which expressed the same level of PTHR as WT mice (Fig. S1). Quantification of cancellous bone volume over tissue volume (BV/TV) in long bone showed that iPTH treatment increased bone volume in WT mice but not in β2AR-KO mice (Fig. 1B). We also observed that the capacity of iPTH treatment to increase the thickness of trabecular bone (Tb.Th) was lost in β2AR-KO mice (Fig. 1C). Such an observation was not limited to long bone because we observed that the lack of β2AR also suppressed iPTH treatment-induced increase in the BV/TV parameter of cancellous bone in vertebral bone (Fig. 1 D and E). Intermittent PTH treatment increased not only the level of morphological parameters but also the level of mineral content in bone measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) (Fig. 1F). This increase was suppressed in mice lacking the β2AR (β2AR-KO) (Fig. 1F). These data indicate that the absence of β2AR suppresses the capacity of intermittent injection of PTH(1–34) to induce structural changes in both long bone and spine associated with an increase in bone mass.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

β2AR control of PTH-induced bone formation. (AC) 2D micro-CT (μ-CT) images of the distal metaphyses of the femur in WT mice and β2AR-KO mice treated either with vehicle (cont) or iPTH (A) and corresponding values for BV/TV (B) and trabecular thickness (C). (D and E) 2D μ-CT images of spine in WT mice and β2AR-KO mice (D) and associated BV/TV parameter obtained from the secondary trabeculae of the fourth lumbar vertebrae (E). (F) Whole-body BMD was measured before and after iPTH treatment or vehicle (cont), and the ratio of posttreatment per pretreatment values are expressed as percentages. Data are expressed as means ± SD for n = 4–5 (*P < 0.05).

Given that the anabolic effect of iPTH results from a tight balance between bone formation and bone resorption (12), we next examined whether the absence of β2AR affects the action of iPTH on bone formation. The capacity of iPTH treatment to increase the amount of bone deposited between two timed administrations of calcein labeling, an indicator of bone mineralization in WT mice, was lost in β2AR-KO (Fig. 2A). Quantification of these calcein intervals revealed that the absence of β2AR suppressed the increase in mineral apposition rate (MAR) by iPTH (Fig. 2B), which is an indicator of the activity of individual osteoblasts. Analyses of dynamic parameters of bone formation further indicated that iPTH increased the mineralizing surface over the bone surface (MS/BS), which reflects the quantity of osteoblasts forming the bone matrix in WT mice but not in β2AR-KO mice. There was a slight elevation in the baseline level in β2AR-KO in MS/BS. However, iPTH did not increase MS/BS in β2AR-KO mice (Fig. 2C). iPTH treatment increased bone formation rate (BFR), an indicator of the amount of bone formation within a unit time period, in WT mice but not in β2AR mice (Fig. 2D).Therefore, the absence of β2AR suppressed the increase of bone formation parameters triggered by iPTH treatment.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

β2AR control of PTH-induced increase in the levels of dynamic bone formation and bone resorption parameters. (A) Calcein band in the distal metaphyses of the femur were visualized to obtain dynamic histomorphometry parameters in WT mice and β2AR-KO mice treated either with vehicle or iPTH. (BD) Parameters of osteoblast activity. (B) Levels of MAR. (C) Lineralizing surface per bone surface (MS/BS). (D) Bone formation rate (BFR). (E) Secondary trabecular regions of the epiphyses of tibiae were examined for osteoclasts based on TRAP staining in vehicle-treated (cont) and iPTH-treated (iPTH) WT mice and β2AR-KO mice. (F and G) Parameters of osteoclast activity. (F) Osteoclast number per bone surface (Oc.N/BS). (G) Osteoclast surface over bone surface area (Oc.S/BS). Data are expressed as means ± SD of n = 4–5) (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).

With respect to bone resorption, iPTH treatment enhanced the number of osteoclasts, which are shown as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive cells over the bone surface (Oc.N/BS), in WT mice, but not in β2AR-KO mice (Fig. 2 E and F). iPTH treatment also increased osteoclast surface over bone surface (Oc.S/BS) in WT mice, which is a rough indicator of osteoclastic activity (Fig. 2 E and G). In contrast, β2AR deficiency suppressed this increase (Fig. 2G). Thus, these histomorphometry analyses indicated that the lack of β2AR suppressed the capacity of iPTH treatment to promote osteoclastic number and activity. Taken together, these data indicate that the presence of β2AR is necessary for the actions of iPTH on both bone formation and bone resorption.

Given that PTHR is expressed in several extraskeletal cell types (proximal and distal tubule cells in kidneys, smooth muscle cells, T lymphocytes), it was unclear whether the suppression of PTH(1–34) osteoanabolism, which was caused by the absence of β2AR, originated directly from osteoblasts or was a secondary consequence of a systemic PTH(1–34) action or β2AR action on extraskeletal tissues. We ruled out this latter possibility by using mice genetically engineered to have increased PTHR signaling activity in osteoblasts only. These mice express a constitutively active PTHR variant (hereafter noted caPTHR) that carries a His/Arg substitution at amino acid 223, which constitutively activates the GS/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway, and which has been associated with Jansen-type metaphyseal dysplasia (11, 13). Previous studies showed that the osteoblastic expression of caPTHR stimulates an anabolic response in trabecular bone, which is in contrast to the decrease of net bone mass observed after continuous perfusion of PTH (13).We now observed that mice with osteoblast-specific expression of caPTHR increased the levels of trabecular bone content in the presence but not in the absence of β2AR (caPTHR/β2AR-KO) (Fig. 3A). Quantification of BV/TV indicated that β2AR deficiency mostly suppressed the capacity of caPTHR to increase bone mass (Fig. 3B). As was the case in β2AR-deficient mice (β2AR-KO), deletion of β2AR in caPTHR transgenic mice (caPTHR/β2AR-KO) blocked increases in mineral apposition rate and BFR triggered by constitutive signaling of caPTHR (Fig. 3D). These data, thus, indicate that the absence of β2AR interferes with PTHR signaling in osteoblasts associated with bone formation.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

β2AR is required for anabolic action of constitutively active PTHR specifically expressed in osteoblasts. (A) Upper images represent Masson–Goldner staining in histological sections of WT, caPTHR, β2AR-KO, and caPTHR/β2AR-KO mice. Lower images represent enlargement corresponding to sections shown in the upper images. (B) BV/TV measured from the secondary trabeculae of the distal metaphyses of the femora. (C) Calcein band in the distal metaphyses of the femur were visualized to obtain dynamic histomorphometry parameters in WT, caPTHR, β2AR-KO, and caPTHR/β2AR-KO mice. (D) MAR and BFR. (E) TRAP staining of decalcified sections of the distal metaphyses of the femora. (F) Osteoclast number per bone surface (Oc.N/BS) and osteoclast surface per bone surface (Oc.S/BS). Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5–6; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).

We next observed that the constitutive activation of PTHR in osteoblasts increased the appearance of osteoclasts (Fig. 3E). Quantification of osteoclasts indicated that β2AR deficiency suppressed the capacity of caPTHR to increase levels of osteoclast number, as well as osteoclast surface (Fig. 3F). Thus, the deletion of β2AR in caPTHR mice recapitulated the loss of the osteoanabolic action of PTH observed in β2AR-KO mice after iPTH treatment. These data indicate that the β2AR control of the anabolic action of PTH is likely mediated by a mechanism operating in osteoblasts.

β2AR Control of PTH-Target Gene Expression.

We next determined whether β2AR deficiency modulated the expression of PTH-target genes involved in bone formation/resorption. To this end, we measured mRNA levels of a series of regulatory proteins in the bone of caPTHR mice and caPTHR/β2AR-KO mice. Expression levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (a marker of early to late stage osteoblast differentiation), type I collagen α1 (Col1α1) (the most abundant structural protein for bone and connective tissues), bone sialoprotein (BSP) (a specific marker of osteoblasts), RANKL (a critical regulatory factor for osteoclastogenesis), and osteoprotegerin (OPG) (the soluble decoy receptor for RANKL) were increased in caPTHR mice compared with WT mice (Fig. 4A). These increases were largely suppressed in caPTHR/β2AR-KO mice (Fig. 4A). We also found that β2AR deficiency reduced the capacity of intermittent injection of PTH to increase the gene expression of ALP, Col1α1, and Runt-related transcription factor (Runx)2 (Fig. S2). The negative effect of β2AR deficiency can also take place just 1 h after a single PTH injection, as observed for gene expression of c-fos and RANKL (1417) (Fig. S3). These increases were reduced in β2AR-KO mice. These observations indicated that the inhibitory effect of β2AR deficiency on PTH anabolism depends on the regulation of the expression of genes related to osteoblast activity and bone metabolism.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Expression of PTH target genes regulated by β2AR. (A and B) Expression of ALP, Col 1α, BSP, RANKL, OPG (A) and Per-1, B-MAL, CLOCK, and cyclin D1 (B), all normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression, in bone samples from WT and β2AR-KO mice. Results are expressed in arbitrary units as means ± SD (n = 5–6/group; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).

Because the action of the sympathetic tone in bone is associated with genes involved in the circadian rhythm, we next compared the expression levels of clock genes in WT, β2AR-KO, caPTHR, and caPTHR/β2AR-KO mice. We previously observed that caPTHR increases the steady-state levels of Period-1 (Per-1) mRNA expression in vivo (18). We now found that the increase in Per-1 mRNA expression triggered by constitutively active PTHR signaling was reduced in caPTHR/β2AR-KO mice (Fig. 4B). The expression level of B-Mal, another clock gene, was not affected regardless of the presence or absence of either caPTHR or β2AR, and CLOCK gene expression was not significantly modulated by β2AR deficiency (Fig. 4B). We conclude that the central clock gene transcription system remains intact in β2AR and caPTHR-β2AR transgenic mice and that Per-1 is a specific target of PTH signaling in osteoblasts that is modulated by β2AR in vivo.

PTH activates bone formation, in part, by stimulating osteoblast proliferation. Expression of caPTHR in osteoblasts enhanced the expression level of cyclin D1, a regulatory protein involved in the cell cycle of early osteoclasts (Fig. 4B). In contrast, β2AR deficiency suppressed this enhancement. Overall, these data indicate the existence of a functional interaction between PTHR and β2AR signaling in osteoblasts that allows the anabolic action of PTH via up-regulation of genes involved in cell proliferation and that is also necessary for bone formation.

β2AR Control of iPTH-Induced Bone Formation in an Osteoporosis Model.

Next, we tested the anabolic action of iPTH in a mouse model for osteoporosis. To this end, we used >50-wk old mice that showed a significant reduction in bone mass compared with younger 10 wk-old mice. Trabecular patterns of these aged mice were sparse (Fig. 5A vs. Fig. 1A: WT, control), and iPTH treatment produced additional trabecular bone (Fig. 5A, WT, iPTH). Aged mice that lack β2AR showed more trabecular bone in the distal femur but did not show an increase in bone after iPTH treatment (Fig. 5A). Quantification of trabecular BV/TV indicated that baseline levels were lower in aged mice (∼5%) than in younger adult mice (∼20%) (Fig. 5B vs. Fig. 1B: WT, control). iPTH treatment was effective and significantly increased BV/TV levels in aged WT mice under condition of low bone mass (Fig. 5B, WT). The absence of β2AR increased bone volume levels by 2–3%. In contrast to WT, iPTH-induced increase in bone volume (BV/TV) was not observed in β2AR-KOmice (Fig. 5 A and B). The higher BV/TV level in β2AR-KO compared with WT aged mice at baseline, presumably resulting from reduced age-related bone resorption, might hide some of the changes that could be caused by iPTH treatment. Despite the uncertainty in differentiating the effect of iPTH and β2AR deficiency in aged mice, the data indicate, without ambiguity, that the absence of β2AR blocks PTH-induced increases in BFR (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Effect of β2AR deficiency in aged mice. Aged mice of >50 wk were subjected to iPTH or vehicle (cont) injection for 4 wk. (A) 2D μ-CT images of the distal end of femur in WT mice and β2AR-KO mice treated either with vehicle (cont) or iPTH . (B) BV/TV and BFR. (C) Osteoclast number per bone surface (Oc.N/BS) and osteoclast surface per bone surface (Oc.S/BS). Data are expressed as means ± SD of n = 4–5 (*P < 0.05).

Further analysis of dynamic parameters of bone metabolism indicated that the BFR was reduced by ∼50% in old WT mice compared with young WT (10-wk-old) mice (0.2 vs. 0.4 μm3/μm2 per d; Fig. 5B vs. Fig. 2D). iPTH injection enhanced BFR levels approximately twofold in WT (Fig. 5B). β2AR deficiency in these aged mice slightly elevated the baseline levels of BFR. In contrast to WT, β2AR deficiency failed to respond to iPTH treatment with regard to BFR (Fig. 5B). Bone resorption parameters showed that the osteoclast number and the osteoclast surface were similar in old and young mice (Fig. 5C). In contrast to bone formation parameters, osteoclastic parameters in aged mice were not significantly altered by iPTH injection regardless of the presence or absence of β2AR (Fig. 5C). These data indicated that in a mouse model for osteoporosis, β2AR is required for iPTH-induced increase in bone mass, and this is mainly based on β2AR requirement for iPTH activation of bone formation.

Discussion

Given that the sympathetic tone via the β2AR has been reported to exert negative effects on bone mass by activating bone resorption and suppressing bone formation (10, 19), we initially predicted that mice lacking the β2AR would improve the anabolic effect of iPTH treatment. Surprisingly, our results indicate the opposite. They support the unexpected feature that β2AR deficiency suppresses the bone-anabolic effect mediated by iPTH (Figs. 1 and 2). Our in vivo studies further show that β2AR deficiency in mice expressing a constitutively active PTHR selectively in osteoblasts suppresses bone formation. This impaired capacity to promote bone formation is accompanied by a reduced expression of several PTH-target genes encoding proteins involved in bone matrix formation (ALP, Col1α1, and BSP), in osteoblast proliferation (cyclin D1), and in the regulation of circadian protein expression (Per-1) in β2AR-deficient caPTHR transgenic mice. The reduction in iPTH-induced increases of gene expression in β2AR-KO mice compared with WT mice further supports the conclusion that PTHR signaling in osteoblasts requires the presence of β2AR for its anabolic action in bone, at least in part, through the regulation of genes encoding proteins necessary for the osteoblastic function. However, additional factors may also be involved in the lack of PTH anabolism seen in β2AR-KO mice. Among them are the levels of CART (cocaine amphetamine regulated transcript), a neuropeptide in the brain and in the circulation that is a major inhibitor of osteoclastogenesis by suppressing RANKL expression, which could be different in WT and β2AR-KO and, thus, be one of the possible mechanisms whereby bone resorption is blunted in the β2AR-KO mice, as we observed in our experiments. Other factors might also originate from osteoclasts, given that the BFR in caPTHR/β2AR-KO mice remains unchanged compared with β2AR-KO mice.

In summary, our studies demonstrate that the β2AR plays a critical role in the osteoanabolic action of PTH by controlling expression of PTH-target genes involved in osteoblast activation and bone formation.

Materials and Methods

Adrb2-deficient mice.

Breeding pairs of Adrb2 heterozygous (Adrb2+/−) with a genetic background of C57/BL6 were used to generate Adrb2 WT and homozygous mutant (Adrb2−/−) mice for this study (21).

Adrb2-deficient Col1α1-caPTHR transgenic mice.

Adrb2−/− mice (noted as β2AR-KO mice) with a genetic background of C57/BL6 and α1(I) collagen-caPTHR transgenic mice with a genetic background of FVB/N were used (11).

In vivo PTH administration.

Ten-week-old (young adult mouse model) or 54-wk-old (aging mouse model) female mice were given s.c. injections of vehicle (saline) or hPTH (1–34) (Bachem) at a concentration of 80 μg/kg body weight for 5 d/wk over 4 wk. For some experiments, 4-wk-old mice were used.

Other methods are described in SI Materials and Methods.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Japanese Ministry of Education [Global Center of Excellence (COE) Program, International Research Center for Molecular Science in Tooth and Bone Diseases Grants-in-Aid 18109011, 18659438, 18123456, 20013014, and 23659868), grants from the Japan Space Forum (to M. Noda), and National Institutes of Health Grant R01DK087688 (to J.-P.V).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1109036109/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Delmas PD. Different effects of antiresorptive therapies on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone. 2002;30:14–17. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00667-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kurland ES, et al. Parathyroid hormone as a therapy for idiopathic osteoporosis in men: Effects on bone mineral density and bone markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:3069–3076. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.9.6818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Orwoll ES, et al. The effect of teriparatide [human parathyroid hormone (1-34)] therapy on bone density in men with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:9–17. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sosa Henríquez M, Díez Pérez A. [Parathyroid hormone in the treatment of osteoporosis] Med Interna. 2007;24:87–97. doi: 10.4321/s0212-71992007000200010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lindsay R, et al. Randomised controlled study of effect of parathyroid hormone on vertebral-bone mass and fracture incidence among postmenopausal women on oestrogen with osteoporosis. Lancet. 1997;350:550–555. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02342-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cosman F, et al. Parathyroid hormone added to established hormone therapy: Effects on vertebral fracture and maintenance of bone mass after parathyroid hormone withdrawal. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:925–931. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Keaveny TM, et al. Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1974–1982. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.080805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saag KG, et al. Teriparatide or alendronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2028–2039. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Takeda S, et al. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell. 2002;111:305–317. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01049-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elefteriou F, et al. Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature. 2005;434:514–520. doi: 10.1038/nature03398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Calvi LM, et al. Activated parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related protein receptor in osteoblastic cells differentially affects cortical and trabecular bone. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:277–286. doi: 10.1172/JCI11296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Neer RM, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1434–1441. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105103441904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Calvi LM, Schipani E. The PTH/PTHrP receptor in Jansen’s metaphyseal chondrodysplasia. J Endocrinol Invest. 2000;23:545–554. doi: 10.1007/BF03343773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McCauley LK, et al. Parathyroid hormone stimulates fra-2 expression in osteoblastic cells in vitro and in vivo. Endocrinology. 2001;142:1975–1981. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.5.8157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ma YL, et al. Catabolic effects of continuous human PTH (1–38) in vivo is associated with sustained stimulation of RANKL and inhibition of osteoprotegerin and gene-associated bone formation. Endocrinology. 2001;142:4047–4054. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.9.8356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fu Q, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC, O’Brien CA. Parathyroid hormone stimulates receptor activator of NFkappa B ligand and inhibits osteoprotegerin expression via protein kinase A activation of cAMP-response element-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:48868–48875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208494200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tyson DR, Swarthout JT, Partridge NC. Increased osteoblastic c-fos expression by parathyroid hormone requires protein kinase A phosphorylation of the cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate response element-binding protein at serine 133. Endocrinology. 1999;140:1255–1261. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.3.6567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hanyu R, et al. Per-1 is a specific clock gene regulated by parathyroid hormone (PTH) signaling in osteoblasts and is functional for the transcriptional events induced by PTH. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:433–438. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kondo H, et al. Unloading induces osteoblastic cell suppression and osteoclastic cell activation to lead to bone loss via sympathetic nervous system. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:30192–30200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504179200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kitahara K, et al. Osteopontin deficiency induces parathyroid hormone enhancement of cortical bone formation. Endocrinology. 2003;144:2132–2140. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chruscinski AJ, et al. Targeted disruption of the beta2 adrenergic receptor gene. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:16694–16700. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.24.16694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES