Abstract
Activation of distinct classes of potassium channels can dramatically affect the frequency and the pattern of neuronal firing. In a subpopulation of vagal afferent neurons (nodose ganglion neurons), the pattern of impulse activity is effectively modulated by a Ca2+-dependent K+ current. This current produces a post-spike hyperpolarization (AHPslow) that plays a critical role in the regulation of membrane excitability and is responsible for spike-frequency accommodation in these neurons. Inhibition of the AHPslow by a number of endogenous autacoids (e.g., histamine, serotonin, prostanoids, and bradykinin) results in an increase in the firing frequency of vagal afferent neurons from <0.1 to >10 Hz. After a single action potential, the AHPslow in nodose neurons displays a slow rise time to peak (0.3–0.5 s) and a long duration (3–15 s). The slow kinetics of the AHPslow are due, in part, to Ca2+ discharge from an intracellular Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) pool. Action potential-evoked Ca2+ influx via either L or N type Ca2+ channels triggers CICR. Surprisingly, although L type channels generate 60% of action potential-induced CICR, only Ca2+ influx through N type Ca2+ channels can trigger the CICR-dependent AHPslow. These observations suggest that a close physical proximity exists between endoplasmic reticulum ryanodine receptors and plasma membrane N type Ca2+ channels and AHPslow potassium channels. Such an anatomical relation might be particularly beneficial for modulation of spike-frequency adaptation in vagal afferent neurons.
Keywords: spike frequency adaptation, ryanodine receptor, autacoids, allergic inflammation, mast cell
Activation and sensitization of primary afferent nerve fibers during allergic inflammation are orchestrated by inflammatory mediators released from various cells, including tissue mast cells. Inflammatory mediators provoke excitability changes in sensory nerves through diverse mechanisms, including (i) modification of the density and coupling efficacy of ligand-gated ionic channels; (ii) alteration in voltage-gated sodium, potassium, and calcium channels; and (iii) manipulation of cellular mechanisms that control spike-frequency adaptation.
After immunologic activation of mast cells in airway in vivo or in sensory ganglia in vitro, a wide range of electrophysiological changes can be detected in peripheral sensory nerve terminals of the vagus (1) and in vagal primary afferent somata (located in the nodose and jugular ganglia) (2). These changes range from transient (minutes) membrane depolarizations that sometimes reach action potential (AP) threshold (3) to a sustained (days) unmasking of functional NK-2 tachykinin receptors (4, 5). One electrical membrane property that is particularly sensitive to inflammatory mediators is a slow post-spike afterhyperpolarization (AHPslow; see Fig. 1) (3). This slow afterpotential influences neuronal excitability and determines the frequency and pattern of neuronal discharge. We have found that the amplitude and duration of the AHPslow are exquisitely sensitive to known inflammatory mediators such as prostanoids, amines, and kinins applied exogenously (Table 1) or released endogenously (i.e., after immunologic activation of mast cells) (3, 6). Inhibition of the AHPslow is accompanied by a loss of spike-frequency adaptation. Thus, modulation of the AHPslow amplitude and duration provides a mechanism for neuronal sensitization.
Table 1.
Mediator | Receptor type | EC50, nM |
---|---|---|
Bradykinin | B2 | 72 |
Histamine | H1 | 2,000 |
Serotonin | nd | 300 |
PGD2, PGE2 | nd | ∼20 |
Leukotriene C4 | nd | ∼100 |
We are interested in identifying the ionic channels and second-messenger transduction pathways that participate in the initiation and maintenance of the AHPslow in vagal primary afferent neurons. In this report, we describe the general properties of this slow afterpotential and our progress in its characterization. Our working hypothesis is that a close functional proximity between three separate channels [N type voltage-sensitive calcium channels, ryanodine (RY)-sensitive Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) calcium channels, and AHPslow K+ (SK) channels that underlie the AHPslow] is essential for the initiation of the AHPslow.
RESULTS
General Properties of Vagal Afferent AHPslow.
The AHPslow is observed in a wide variety of peripheral and central neurons (for review, see ref. 7). In nodose neurons, AHPslow is always preceded by a fast post-spike afterhyperpolarization (AHPfast, 10–50 ms) that occurs at the end of the AP repolarization. In some neurons, the AHPfast is followed by a second afterpotential that lasts 50–300 ms (AHPmedium). The AHPmedium is voltage- and Ca2+- dependent and blocked by 10 mM tetraethylammonium in ≈50% of neurons, suggesting that it is mediated by large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (BK channels) (8).
In vagal afferent somata, the AHPslow is particularly robust. After a single AP, the AHPslow displays a delayed onset (100–500 ms), a slow rise time to peak (0.3–5 s), and a long duration (2–15 s; see Fig. 1). The proportion of AHPslow neurons within nodose ganglia varies among species: ≈20% in the guinea pig, ≈35% in rabbit, and ≈85% in ferret. Only nodose neurons classified as C fibers (conduction velocity <1 m/s) possess AHPslow. To date, there have been few species differences in the pharmacological or physiological properties of the AHPslow. An analogous slow AHP has also been recently described in ≈25% of C type dorsal root ganglion neurons of the rat (9, 10).
The AHPslow in vagal afferent neurons influences cellular excitability and controls AP frequency over the physiological range from 0.1 Hz to 10 Hz (11, 12). One interesting property of the AHPslow is that its amplitude is tuned to both AP number and frequency. Over the range of 1–100 Hz, the amplitude of the AHPslow increases with the number of APs until it plateaus after ≈15 APs (Fig. 2); similar results were observed when the current underlying the AHPslow was monitored. For reasons still unresolved, 10 Hz (100-msec interspike intervals) consistently evokes the largest responses.
The current generating the AHPslow (IAHP) is a voltage-insensitive Ca2+-dependent K+ current (13, 14) that is unaffected by a wide range of K+ channel antagonists: 100 nM apamin, 10 μM d-tubocurarine, 5 mM Cs+, 30 mM tetraethylammonium, 10 mM Ba2+, 4 mM 4-aminopyridine, and 10 nM charybdotoxin. The magnitude of the AHPslow (or the IAHP) is linearly related to the concentration of extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 3) and requires a rise in cytosolic free Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) for activation. Buffering intracellular Ca2+ with 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA) abolishes the AHPslow (Fig. 4). Noise analysis of the IAHP suggests a single-channel conductance of ≈10 pS (unpublished observations). These features are consistent with the properties of a small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel (SK channel; ref. 8). Of the several SK channels recently cloned from mammalian brain (15), the hSK1 channel has a pharmacological and biophysical profile compatible with the K+ current underlying the AHPslow in nodose neurons.
Ca2+ Injection Evokes Two Temporally Distinct Outward Currents.
To test whether the K+ channels associated with the AHPmedium and the AHPslow are directly activated by Ca2+, we iontophoretically injected Ca2+ into nodose neurons. Independent of the AHPslow, a large outward current with rapid activation and decay kinetics was elicited by Ca2+ injection. This current (IK-medium) was evoked at holding potentials between −2 mV and −45 mV. It was completely blocked by 5 mM tetraethylammonium but unaffected by inhibitors of the AHPslow (100 nM prostaglandins D2 or E2 or 1 μM forskolin). IK-medium was strongly voltage-dependent, requiring membrane holding potentials more positive than −55 mV. Assuming a reversal potential of −80 mV, IK-medium had an e-fold increase in peak conductance for each 8.0 ± 1.0 mV (mean ± SEM; n = 8) depolarization, as calculated from semilogarithmic plots of peak chord conductance versus voltage-clamp holding potential. These properties are similar to those of large-conductance BK (AHPmedium) channels.
In neurons that exhibited AHPslow, Ca2+ injection provoked a slowly developing and protracted outward current (IK-slow). Fig. 5 shows an overlay of the outward current responses evoked by Ca2+ injection in a single nodose C type neuron at holding potentials of −20 mV and −50 mV. The kinetic differences between IK-medium and IK-slow after Ca2+ injection are dramatic. In contrast to the rapid activation of IK-medium, the onset of IK-slow is delayed, and the decay of IK-medium is nearly complete before the peak amplitude of the IK-slow is reached. These two outward currents mirror the temporal and pharmacological differences between AHPmedium and AHPslow. IK-slow, like the AHPslow, was blocked by 100 nM prostaglandin D2. The data shown in Table 2 summarize quantitative differences between these two Ca2+-induced outward currents.
Table 2.
Current | Peak conductance, nS | n | Holding potential, mV | n | Time-to-peak, ms | n | Decay time constant, ms | n | Duration, s | n |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IK-slow | 27.9 ± 6.5 | 14 | −55.4 ± 2.7 | 14 | 6,570 ± 1085 | 12 | 6,735 ± 789 | 5 | 23 ± 3.4 | 14 |
IK-medium | 53.2 ± 16.5 | 6 | −20 ± 3.7 | 6 | 958 ± 56 | 6 | 818 ± 97 | 6 | 2.5 ± 0.16 | 6 |
IK-slow and IK-medium are outward currents elicited by iontophoretic injection Ca2+ into acutely isolated nodose neurons of the rabbit. The peak conductance is the largest conductance elicited, independent of membrane potential. The holding potential is the potential at which the peak conductance was measured. The decay time constant was measured by fitting a line, by eye, to the log transform of the decay of the current. The duration was calculated from the onset of Ca2+ injection to the time at which the current had decayed to 20% of its peak value. Data are summarized as the mean ± SEM.
It is possible that the delayed onset of IK-slow compared with IK-medium results from unequal Ca2+ diffusion distances from the injection site to the two types of K+ channels. This cause seems unlikely because the orientation of impalement was random, and the plasma membranes of dissociated nodose neurons appear devoid of processes that would provide semi-isolated regions where IK-slow might be generated. An alternative possibility is that additional intermediate steps, such as the synthesis or release of a second messenger, are required to activate IK-slow. The large Q10 (>3.0; ref. 14) supports the latter alternative. One candidate is mobilization of intracellularly stored Ca2+.
Ca2+ Released by the CICR Pool Is Essential for the Generation of the AHPslow.
Single APs produce transient increases in [Ca2+]i (ΔCat) as measured by the fluorescent indicator fura-2. The magnitude of the ΔCat depends on both [Ca2+]o and the number of APs. Over the range of one to eight APs, there is an approximately linear relation between the magnitude of the ΔCat and the number of APs (Fig. 6). In the presence of drugs that block CICR but do not significantly affect AP-induced Ca2+ influx [(RY, 10 μM), 2,5,-di(t-butyl)hydroquinone (DBHQ, 10 μM), or thapsigargin (TG, 100 nM)], we found that at least eight APs were required to evoke a detectable ΔCat (Fig. 6). In the presence of RY, DBHQ, and TG, the ΔCat–AP relation exhibits slopes of 0.5, 1.1, and 0.8 nM per AP, respectively. When compared with the slope of 9.6 nM per AP in control neurons, Ca2+ influx produced by a single nodose AP is amplified by 5- to 10-fold by CICR (16). Nodose neurons demonstrate a relatively low stimulus threshold for eliciting CICR. For instance, a robust CICR response can be observed after a single AP stimulus in nodose neurons, whereas many tens of APs are required in dorsal root ganglion neurons (17). The greater CICR response in nodose neurons is not due to greater Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCCs); a single AP produces comparable Ca2+ influx in nodose and dorsal root ganglion neurons (39 vs. 49 pC, respectively; refs. 16 and 18). Rather, the more responsive CICR pool in nodose neurons may reflect either a closer proximity between plasma membrane Ca2+ influx channels and endoplasmic reticulum RY receptors or a more sensitive RY receptor.
By using physiological stimuli (APs) in conjunction with pharmacological manipulations of CICR, we have demonstrated that CICR is essential for the development of the AHPslow. Over the range of 1–16 APs, the magnitudes of the AP-induced AHPslow and the ΔCat (a monitor of CICR in these neurons) were highly correlated (r = 0.985). Simultaneous recordings of ΔCat and AHPslow before and during bath application of CICR inhibitors (RY, TG, DBHQ, or 10 μM cyclopiazonic acid) revealed that both responses were blocked in a parallel fashion (Fig. 7; see also Table 1 in ref. 19). These data indicate that a CICR pool is essential for the generation of the AHPslow. They also provide a potential explanation for the slow kinetics of the AHPslow, namely Ca2+ mobilization from CICR.
Effects of Changing [Ca2+]o on the AHPslow, ΔCat, and Ca2+ influx.
If the AHPslow depends on Ca2+ released from the CICR pool triggered by AP-induced Ca2+ influx, it would follow that changes in [Ca2+]o should produce corresponding effects on both the AHPslow and the ΔCat. The data shown in Fig. 3A illustrate the effects of progressively lowering [Ca2+]o from 2.0 mM to nominally zero on the amplitude of the AHPslow recorded in a single nodose neuron. As [Ca2+]o was decreased, the amplitude of the AHPslow was reduced proportionally. When the results from this and five additional neurons were plotted (Fig. 3B), the relation between [Ca2+]o and the amplitude of the AHPslow was linear (r = 0.993; n = 6, pooled data from three current-clamp and three hybrid voltage-clamp experiments).
Next, we examined the relation between [Ca2+]o and the magnitude of the AP-induced ΔCat. Fig. 8A illustrates ΔCats elicited by varying numbers of APs recorded from a single neuron in Locke solution containing 2.2 or 1.1 mM Ca2+. The population results relating the normalized amplitude of the ΔCats recorded in four neurons to the number of APs is shown in Fig. 8B. In 1.1 mM [Ca2+]o, the first few APs did not elicit a measurable ΔCat. For the neuron shown in Fig. 8A, at least eight APs were necessary to evoke a detectable ΔCat. In three additional neurons, the minimum number of APs necessary to elicit a detectable ΔCat ranged from 4 to 32. The ΔCat–AP relation recorded in 1.1 mM [Ca2+]o, as in Locke solution containing normal [Ca2+]o, followed a hyperbolic relation (χ2 = 6.75 and 0.31; r = 0.988 and 0.999 for 2.2 and 1.1 mM Ca2+,respectively; Fig. 8B and see also Fig. 1 in ref. 16). Given the hyperbolic nature of the ΔCat–AP relation, deducing the effects of altered [Ca2+]o on the magnitude of the ΔCat clearly depends on where along this relation the comparison is made. At one extreme, there is a ≈2-fold change when comparing the plateau phases of the curves in normal and one-half normal [Ca2+]o. It is also possible to calculate the limiting initial slopes for the rising phase of the curves (dashed lines in Fig. 8B). The limiting slopes, which represent the full Ca2+ release potential of the CICR pool before any release has actually occurred, were 15 ± 3.8 and 2 ± 0.7 nM per AP in 2.2 and 1.1 mM [Ca2+]o, respectively. Thus, reducing [Ca2+]o by a factor of 2 results in a reduction of the ΔCat by a factor of 7 ± 2.8 when the rising phases of the two curves are compared. The ≈7-fold reduction of the ΔCat associated with halving [Ca2+]o is much larger than the 2-fold reduction in the AHPslow amplitude (Fig. 3), suggesting that some, but not all, of the Ca2+ released from the CICR pool is required for the generation of the AHPslow.
The disproportionate effect of reduced [Ca2+]o on the ΔCat versus the AHPslow could arise from a nonlinear reduction of Ca2+ influx per AP and/or from a decreased Ca2+ release from CICR pool per unit Ca2+ influx. To study these possibilities, we examined the effect of lowering [Ca2+]o on AP-induced Ca2+ influx. The amount of Ca2+ entering a neuron with each AP in normal and in reduced [Ca2+]o was determined by using a prerecorded AP as whole-cell voltage-clamp command under experimental conditions where the major inward charge carrier is Ca2+ (for details, see Fig. 2 in ref. 16). When [Ca2+]o was decrementally reduced from 2 mM to nominally zero, the magnitude of the ICa decreased proportionally. The charge movement caused by Ca2+ influx, normalized to cell membrane capacitance (pC/pF), was plotted against varying [Ca2+]o for 12 neurons. Over the range of 0–2.0 mM [Ca2+]o, Ca2+ influx varied linearly with [Ca2+]o (r = 0.974). These results indicate that changes in Ca2+ influx alone cannot account for the disproportionate reduction in the ΔCat relative to the AHPslow that is observed when [Ca2+]o is reduced.
The disproportionate effect of reduced [Ca2+]o on the ΔCat–AHPslow relation could arise from a diminution in the amount of Ca2+ released from the CICR pool. Caffeine, a known agonist of CICR, is traditionally used to assess the releasable content of the CICR pool. In 8 of the 13 neurons studied, halving [Ca2+]o reduced the caffeine-induced ΔCat by 20–79% (100% vs. 47 ± 7.2% in 2.2 and 1.1 mM [Ca2+]o, respectively; P = 0.0002). In other words, decreasing [Ca2+]o by a factor of 2 caused a 1.25- to 5-fold reduction in the caffeine response. On returning to normal Locke solution, the caffeine response was restored to near control values. In the remaining five neurons, the caffeine-induced ΔCat was unaffected by reducing [Ca2+]o (100% vs. 112 ± 8.4% in 2.2 and 1.1 mM [Ca2+]o, respectively; P = 0.690). There was no significant difference in resting levels of [Ca2+]i between these two groups of neurons (93 ± 29.5 nM vs. 111 ± 29.7 nM; P = 0.530). Unfortunately, the wide variability in the effects of reduced [Ca2+]o on the caffeine responses prevents a meaningful interpretation of the effect of [Ca2+]o on the releasable content of the CICR pool.
Ca2+ Influx Through N Type Calcium Channels Selectively Elicits AHPslow.
Six types of VDCCs have been described in neurons: L, N, P, Q, R, and T (20). Nodose neurons express several types of VDCCs. By using a panel of pharmacologic reagents that are selective for different types of VDCCs, we tested the contribution of each to the total AP-induced Ca2+ current. Our results, summarized in Table 3, reveal that ≈85% of the AP-induced inward Ca2+ current is shared by L and N type Ca2+ channels (Fig. 9). P, Q, and T type Ca2+ channel antagonists were ineffective, suggesting that the remaining Ca2+ current is associated with Ca2+ influx through R type channels. Nifedipine (10 μM), an L type Ca2+ channel blocker, produced no measurable effect on either the AHPfast, the AHPmedium, or the AHPslow. By contrast, ω-conotoxin-GVIA (0.5 μM), a selective N type Ca2+ channel blocker, always obliterated the AHPslow, and in ≈50% of the neurons abolished the AHPmedium (about half of the AHPmedium are Ca2+-sensitive, see above), while leaving the AHPfast unaffected (Fig. 9 and Table 4.). These results indicate that the SK and BK type K+ channels are both regulated by Ca2+ influx through N type channels. BK channels are gated by influx Ca2+ directly (8), whereas SK channels are affected by influx Ca2+ indirectly (i.e., Ca2+ entering through N type VDCC triggers RY receptors to release Ca2+ from CICR pools). Such a sequence implies a functional coupling between N type Ca2+ channels and RY channels in the endoplasmic reticulum. We tested this proposition by examining the effects of VDCC antagonists on the magnitude of AP-induced ΔCat.
Table 3.
Channel type | Channel blocker | Concentration μM | Reduction | n |
---|---|---|---|---|
T | Amiloride | 500 | 0 ± 0 | 18 |
L | Nifedipine | 10 | 44 ± 5.6 | 9 |
P/Q | ω-AGA IVA | 0.2 | 0 ± 0 | 2 |
Q | ω-CTX MVIIC | 0.25 | 0 ± 0 | 6 |
N | ω-CTX GVIA | 1 | 40 ± 4.0 | 15 |
The blocking effect of amiloride, nifedipine, ω-agatoxin (AGA) IVA, ω-conotoxin (CTX) MVIIC, and ω-conotoxin (CTX) GVIA is expressed as percent reduction in the peak amplitude of the total calcium current ± SEM. n corresponds to the number of cells for each condition.
Table 4.
Channel type | Channel blocker | Reduction, %
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca2+ transient | n | AHPslow amplitude | n | ||
L | Nifedipine | 57 ± 7.7 | 21 | 0 ± 0 | 5 |
N | ω-CTX GVIA | 39 ± 6.2 | 4 | 100 ± 0 | 6 |
T, R | Nickel | nd | 0 ± 0 | 5 | |
All | Cadmium | 100 ± 0 | 2 | 100 ± 0 | 6 |
The following concentrations of antagonists were used: nifedipine (10 μM), ω-conotoxin GVIA (0.5 μM or 1 μM), nickel (50−500 μM), and cadmium (100 μM). nd, not determined.
Ca2+ influx through both L and N type Ca2+ channels triggers CICR. The magnitude of the ΔCat is a sensitive indicator of Ca2+ release from the CICR pool. To determine the relative influence of Ca2+ influx through L and N type channels on release from the CICR pool, we applied selective VDCC antagonists and monitored the amplitude of ΔCat. Nifedipine (10 μM) and ω-conotoxin-GVIA (0.5–1.0 μM) diminished the amplitude of the ΔCat by 57% and 39%, respectively (Fig. 9 and Table 4). These results reveal that Ca2+ entering through either L or N type Ca2+ channels provides “trigger” Ca2+ to stimulate CICR. Given that the amount of Ca2+ influx through L and N type Ca2+ channels is comparable (44% and 40%, respectively, of total AP-induced Ca2+ influx; see Table 3), there must be a remarkable spatial arrangement between plasma membrane N type Ca2+ channels, endoplasmic reticulum RY receptors, and plasma membrane SK channels. Our working hypothesis concerning the regulation of the AHPslow by Ca2+ is illustrated schematically in Fig. 10.
DISCUSSION
Whether recorded in intact vagal sensory ganglia or in acutely isolated vagal afferent somata (nodose neurons), single APs can elicit an AHPslow that exhibits a delayed onset (50–300 ms), a slow time to peak amplitude (0.3–0.5 s), and a particularly long duration (2–15 s) (14, 21). Inhibition of the AHPslow by numerous inflammatory mediators (e.g., bradykinin, prostanoids, histamine, serotonin, leukotriene C4; see Table 1) results in an increased neuronal excitability and a loss of spike-frequency adaptation. Thus, modulation of the AHPslow by these mediators provides a mechanism for peripheral nociceptor sensitization that may underlie allergic inflammation-induced hyperalgesia.
One unresolved but important mechanistic question revolves around the delayed onset and protracted duration of the AHPslow. Many of our studies of nodose AHPslow were performed with acutely dissociated adult neurons, which are essentially spherical structures lacking dendritic and axonal processes. Thus, the delayed onset of the AHPslow cannot be due to slow diffusion of Ca2+ from distal sites of influx to somal SK channels. The high temperature coefficient (Q10 > 3.0) for the rising phase and the decay time constant of the nodose AHPslow (14) also argues against simple Ca2+ diffusion as an explanation for the slow kinetics of the AHPslow. The time course of the AHPslow could arise from unusual channel kinetics of the SK channels. This also appears unlikely if SK channels in nodose neurons have activation kinetics similar to those cloned from rat brain (22). Recombinant SK channels from rat brain have activation time constants that are orders of magnitude shorter than the rise time of the AHPslow. It is more likely that the time course of the AHPslow is a consequence of the ΔCat because of CICR.
If the AHPslow is directly dependent on Ca2+ released from the CICR pool, the AHPslow and the AP-induced rise in [Ca2+]i should display similar kinetics. Quantitative kinetic comparisons between these two variables are subject to some uncertainty, because the time course of the ΔCat reflects global changes in [Ca2+ ]I, whereas the kinetics of the AHPslow are determined by events at the plasma membrane. Nonetheless, we determined the time-to-peak and 10-to-90% decay time for both the AHPslow and the ΔCat elicited by one to eight APs (19). The time-to-peak for AHPslow was significantly slower than the ΔCat by nearly a factor of a two (1.0 s vs. 1.9 s); the ΔCat also decayed more rapidly than the AHPslow (3 s vs. 7 s). Analogous temporal discrepancies have been reported between the ΔCat and AHPslow in vagal motoneurons (23). Such temporal differences suggest that Ca2+ released from CICR pools does not act alone to gate AHPslow K+ channels. Cloned SK channels contain many potential phosphorylation sites (15); Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation and/or dephosphorylation may thus be additional processes in the signal-transduction pathway of AP-evoked AHPslow.
Unambiguous data now exist showing that Ca2+ can directly activate SK channels in hippocampal neurons (24) and in Xenopus oocytes (22). In nodose neurons, it is less clear whether Ca2+ alone is sufficient to activate and sustain the AHPslow after an AP. In hippocampal neurons, flash photolysis of a “caged” Ca2+ chelator immediately truncates AP-induced AHPslow, suggesting that elevated intracellular Ca2+ is required to maintain the AHPslow (25). These results do not, however, distinguish between continuous Ca2+ gating of SK channel and the involvement of other Ca2+-dependent factors sustaining the longevity of the AHPslow. It is also possible that Ca2+-dependent factors act synergistically with Ca2+ to control SK channels (23). The nearly spherical morphology and large size of acutely isolated adult nodose neurons provide a favorable preparation to determine the nature of second messengers required to activate and sustain the AHPslow.
In conclusion, a subset of vagal primary afferent neurons possess a slowly developing and long-lasting spike afterhyperpolarization, the AHPslow, that can profoundly affect the discharge frequency of these visceral afferent neurons. Although AP-evoked Ca2+ influx via both L and N type Ca2+ channels triggers CICR, only Ca2+ flux through N type channels activates the CICR-dependent AHPslow. This type of specificity suggests that spatial coupling between N type Ca2+ channels and SK channels may be critical for the generation of the AHPslow in nodose neurons. The exact mechanism coupling ΔCat to the AHPslow current remains to be determined.
Acknowledgments
We thank our coworkers who participated in many of the experiments described in this manuscript: Drs. Akiva Cohen, Samir Jafri, and Bill Wonderlin, and Mr. Glen Taylor. The authors also thank Dr. Liz Katz and Mr. Eric Lancaster for their constructive suggestions on an earlier draft of this manuscript. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM-46956 to J.P.Y.K., NS-22069 to D.W. and Training Grant NS-07375 to K.A.M.
ABBREVIATIONS
- AP
action potential
- BK
large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels
- SK
small-conductance Ca2+ -activated K+ channels
- CICR
Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release stores
- RY
ryanodine
- VDCC
voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels
- L
N, R, L type, N type, and R-type VDCC
- AHP
afterhyperpolarization
- DBHQ
2,5,-di(t-butyl)hydroquinone
References
- 1.Undem B J, Riccio M M. In: Asthma. Barnes P J, Grunstein M M, Leff A, Woolcock A J, editors. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1997. pp. 1009–1026. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Weinreich D. Pulm Pharmacol. 1995;8:173–179. doi: 10.1006/pulp.1995.1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Undem B J, Hubbard W, Weinreich D. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1993;44:35–44. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(93)90376-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Weinreich D, Moore K A, Taylor G E. J Neurosci. 1997;17:7683–7693. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-20-07683.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Moore K A, Taylor G E, Weinreich D. J Physiol (London) 1999;514(1):111–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.111af.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Greene R, Fowler J C, MacGlashlan D, Jr, Weinreich D. J Appl Physiol. 1988;64:2249–2253. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.5.2249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sah P. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:150–154. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)80026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Blatz A L, Magleby K L. Trends Neurosci. 1987;10:463–467. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gold M S, Shuster M J, Levine J D. Neurosci Lett. 1996;205:161–164. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12401-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Villière V, McLachlan E M. J Physiol (London) 1996;76:1924–1941. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.3.1924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Coleridge J C G, Coleridge H M. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1984;99:1–110. doi: 10.1007/BFb0027715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weinreich D, Wonderlin W F. J Physiol (London) 1987;394:415–427. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Higashi H, Morita K, North R A. J Physiol (London) 1984;355:479–492. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fowler J C, Greene R, Weinreich D. J Physiol (London) 1985;365:59–75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Köhler M, Hirschberg B, Bond C T, Kinzie J M, Marrion N V, Adelman J P. Nature (London) 1996;273:1709–1714. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5282.1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cohen A S, Moore K A, Bangalore R, Jafri M S, Weinreich D, Kao J P Y. J Physiol (London) 1997;499:315–328. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shmigol A, Verkhratsky A, Isenberg G. J Physiol (London) 1995;489:627–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp021078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Scroggs R S, Fox A P. J Neurosci. 1992;12:1789–1801. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-05-01789.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moore K A, Cohen A S, Kao J P Y, Weinreich D. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:688–694. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dunlap K, Luebke J I, Turner T J. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:89–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leal-Cardosa H, Koschorke G M, Taylor G, Weinreich D. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1993;45:29–39. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(93)90359-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hirschberg B, Maylie J, Adelman J P, Marrion N V. J Gen Physiol. 1998;111:565–581. doi: 10.1085/jgp.111.4.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lasser-Ross B, Ross W N, Yarom Y. J Neurophysiol. 1997;78:825–834. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marrion N V, Tavalin S J. Nature (London) 1998;395:900–905. doi: 10.1038/27674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lancaster B, Zucker R S. J Physiol (London) 1994;475:229–239. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Weinreich D, Koschorke G M, Undem B J, Taylor G E. J Physiol (London) 1995;483(3):735–746. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jafri M S, Moore K A, Taylor G E, Weinreich D. J Physiol (London) 1997;503(3):533–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.533bg.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Christian E P, Taylor G E, Weinreich D. J Appl Physiol. 1989;67:584–591. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.2.584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]