Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2012 Mar 20;14(7):1869–1871. doi: 10.1021/ol300466a

Enantioselective Total Synthesis of (+)-Amabiline

Timothy J Senter 1, Olugbeminiyi O Fadeyi 1, Craig W Lindsley 1,*
PMCID: PMC3359844  NIHMSID: NIHMS365191  PMID: 22432912

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms365191f7.jpg

The first total synthesis of (+)-amabiline, an unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloid from Cynoglossum amabile is reported. This convergent, enantioselective synthesis proceeds in 15 steps, 10 steps longest linear sequence, in 6.2% overall yield and features novel methodology to construct the unsaturated pyrrolizidine or (−)-supinidine core.


Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (1), historically referred to as necine bases, share a common azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane core, but differ based on the oxygenation pattern and whether or not C1–C2 is saturated (Figure 1).1 While the amine bases themselves are rarely isolated in nature, the corresponding mono- and di-esters are more common, as either the tertiary amine or the N-oxide, 2–5.1 Members of this family of alkaloids possess a wide range of biological activities including antitumor, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, carcinogenic and hepatotoxic activity, with several members entering human clinical trials.15 Plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids are toxic to humans and animals, but several insect species have evolved to employ them for their own chemical defense.6 Interestingly, the toxicity has been attributed to liver metabolism of the C1–C2 unsaturated congeners leading to the generatation of highly reactive alkylating agents.7

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structures and numbering convention of pyrrolizidine alkaloids 1, and representative examples 2–4.

A number of racemic routes to the pyrrolizidine alkaloid core (1) have been developed, but recent efforts have focused on asymmetric approaches.15 The majority of these approaches rely on the chiral pool, employing l-proline, malic acid or carbohydrates as chiral starting materials.1 Based on the synthetic challenge, the diverse biological activity and our recently reported methodology to construct multiple bicyclic azacine systems,8 we decided to apply our methodology towards the enantioselective synthesis of (+)-amabiline (3), an unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloid, isolated in 1967 from Cynoglossum amabile, that has yet to be the subject of a total synthesis.7,912

Our retrosynthesis first cleaved the ester bond to liberate the necine base (−)-supinidine (6) and (−)-viridifloric acid (7). 6 has been synthesized previously, but the most expedient route required 18 steps.13 By employing a novel extension of our newly developed azacine methodology,8 6 would be accessed from 8, which would be derived form commercial diol 10 and (S)-tert-butyl sulfinimine 11. (−)-Viridifloric acid (7) would be prepared as prescribed by Schulz,14 via 9, from commercial 12 and 13.

Efforts initially focused on the synthesis of 7 (Scheme 2).14 Alkylation of phosphonate ester 12 with 13 provided 14 in 93% yield. A Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction with acetaldehyde provided alkene 15, which then underwent a Sharpless dihydroxylation to afford (S,S)-diol 16 in >8:1 dr. Ester hydrolysis gave the (−)-viridifloric acid (7), idenitical in all respects to the natural acid, which was then protected as the dioxolane congener 9. Thus, the synthesis of 9 required five steps and proceeded in 48% overall yield.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of protected (−)-viridifloric acid (9).

With 7 in hand, attention was now directed to the synthesis of key intermediate 8 (Scheme 3). Commercial diol 10 was mono-silyated. MnO2 oxidation of the allylic alcohol then delivered aldehyde 17 in 84% yield for the two steps. Condensation of 17 with (S)-tert-butyl sulfinimine 11 gave 18 in 79% yield.8,1517 Addition of Grignard reagent 19 provides 20 in >9:1 dr,8,1521 which is subsequently allylated to deliver 21 in 77% yield for the two steps. A ring closing metathasis reaction employing Grubbs II22 smoothly led to pyrrolidine 22, and a TBAF deprotection generated the key intermediate 8. Single X-ray crystallography (Figure 2) confirmed the absolute stereochemistry of 8 as (S,S).23 Here, we anticipated that deprotection of the acetal and the sulfinamine would liberate the free aldehyde and amine, respectively, followed by an intramolecular condensation to form the imine that would then be reduced in situ to provide (−)-supinidine (6). However, classical Ellman conditions and a number of other variants failed to facilitate this transformation, affording complex mixtures of polar species.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of key intermediate 8 and attempted synthesis of 6.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

X-ray structure (ORTEP) of key intermediate 8, confirming the correct (S,S)-stereochemistry.

Therefore, we elected to first couple 8 and 9, followed by global deprotection and intramolecular reductive amination. However, this too proved difficult, due to the sterically hindered acid 9. We evaluated several coupling reagents (EDCI/DMAP, TBTU/DBU, DCC/DMAP, HATU/DIEA) and protocols, but none provided any trace of the ester product. Therefore, we decided to convert the hydroxyl of 8 into a leaving group, and attempt to install the ester linkage by emloying the acid as a nucleophile. A mesylate derivative afforded a 45% conversion to the desired ester, but 23, a tosylate variant, afforded the desired ester in 82% yield (Scheme 4). A final acid-mediated global deprotection of the acetal, the dioxolane and the sulfinamine enabled the intramolecular condensation to form the imine, which was then reduced in situ by MP-BH(OAc)3 to deliver amabiline (3) in 37% yield in a five step, one-pot reaction cascade (an average of 82% yield/transformation). Thus, the first total synthesis of (+)-amabiline (3) was completed in 15 synthetic steps (10 steps longest linear sequence) and in 6.2% overall yield. Our synthetic amabiline was identical in all respects to the data reported for natural 3. Moreover, this represents a notable improvement, as previous efforts have required up to 18 steps to deliver (−)-supinidine (6), the parent necine base.13

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of (+)-amabiline (3).

Based on the strucutral similarity of 3 to other pyrroliozidine alklaoids with anticholinergic activity,15 we evaluated our synthetic 3 against all five human mAChR receptors (hM1–M5). Interestingly, 3 possessed no activity at any of the mAChRs (IC50s >10 µM), as well as a larger collection of GPCRs, ion channels and transporters.

In summary, we have completed the first total synthesis of (+)-amabiline (3), requiring only 15 synthetic steps (10 steps longest linear sequence) in 6.2% overall yield. This highly convergent and concise synthesis will enable the preparation of unnatural, unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloids for additional biological evaluation. Further refinements are in progress and will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Retrosynthetic analysis of (+)-amabiline (3).

Acknowledgment

This work was supported, in part, by the Department of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt University. Funding for the NMR instrumentation was provided in part by a grant from NIH (S10 RR019022).

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures, characterization data, and 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.For reviews on the pyrrolizidine alkaolids see: Robins DJ. J. Nat. Prod. Report. 1989;6:221. doi: 10.1039/np9890600221. Ikeda M, Sato T, Ishibashi H. Heterocycles. 1988;27:1465. Dai W-M, Nagao Y. Heterocycles. 1990;30:1231–1261.
  • 2.Culvenor CCJ, Dowling DT, Edgar JA, Jago MV. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1969;163:837. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zalkow LH, Glinski JA, Gelbaum LT, Fleischmann TJ, McGowan LS, Gordon MM. J. Med. Chem. 1985;28:687. doi: 10.1021/jm00383a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Suffness M, Cordell GA. In: The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology. Brossi A, editor. Vol. 25. NY: Academic Press; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheeke PR. In: Toxicants of Plant Origins. Cheeke PR, editor. Vol. 1. Florida: CRC Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hartmann T, Biller A, Witte L, Ernst L, Boppre M. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1990;18:549–556. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.White L, Rubiolo P, Bicchi C, Hartmann T. Phytochemistry. 1993;32:187–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Faedyi OO, Senter TJ, Hahn KN, Lindsley CW. Eur. J. Chem. doi: 10.1002/chem.201200629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Culvenor CCJ, Smith LW. Aust. J. Chem. 1967;20:2499–2503. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.El-Shazy A, Sarg T, Ateya A, Aziz EA, Witte L, Wink M. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1996;24:415–421. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roeder E, Breitmaier E, Birecka H, Frohlich MW, Badzies-Crombach A. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:1703–1706. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.In 1993, a strucuturally unrelated Amaryllidaceae alkaloid, was isolated and also named amabiline. However, the moniker of amabiline has been appied to 3 in multiple manuscripts over the past 45 years. For the isolation and synthesis of the Amaryllidaceae alkaoid also named amabiline see: Likhitwitayawuid K, Angerhofer CK, Pezzuto JM, Cordell GA, Ruangrungsi N. J. Nat. Prod. 1993;56:1331. doi: 10.1021/np50098a017. Findlay AD, Banwell MG. Org. Lett. 2009;11:3160–3162. doi: 10.1021/ol901230w.
  • 13.Takahata, Banba Y, Momose T. Tetrahedron. 1991;47:7635–7644. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stritzke K, Schulz S, Nishida R. Eur. J. Chem. 2002:3884–3892. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brinner KM, Ellman JA. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005;3:2109–2113. doi: 10.1039/b502080h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schulte ML, Lindsley CW. Org. Lett. 2011;13:5684–5687. doi: 10.1021/ol202415j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu G, Cogan DA, Owens TD, Tang TP, Ellman TP. J. Org,. Chem. 1999;64:1278–1284. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tang TP, Ellman JA. J. Org. Chem. 2002;67:7819–7832. doi: 10.1021/jo025957u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Weix DJ, Shi Y, Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:1092–1093. doi: 10.1021/ja044003d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brak K, Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:3850–3851. doi: 10.1021/ja9002603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cogan DA, Liu G, Ellman JA. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:8883–8904. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kuhn KM, Champange TM, Hong SH, Wei W-H, Nickel A, Lee CW, Virgil SC, Grubbs RH, Pederson RL. Org. Lett. 2010;125:984–987. doi: 10.1021/ol9029808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.See the Supporting Information for full details.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES