To the Editor:
I have read the article "Progression of a fracture site impaction as a prognostic indicator of impacted femoral neck fracture treated with multiple pinning" by Yoon et al.1) in the current issue of your esteemed journal and congratulate the authors. Yet, I would like to elaborate on a few important relevant concepts in the same regard.
The authors have not considered the other vector in the femoral neck collapse. The articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) in the article and also in the 'capital impaction index' by Shimizu et al.,2) is only the 'vertical' vector of the femoral neck collapse force. This vector only indicates the 'shear' and not the 'impaction' at the fracture site, as is indicated in the title. The true impaction at the fracture site will be determined by the 'horizontal' ATD, that is from the medial most point of head articular surface to the tangent drawn along the lateral most part of the greater trochanter. Hence, more the impaction, greater the decrease in the 'horizontal' ATD and lesser the change in the 'vertical' ATD. Like-wise, greater the shear at the fracture site, greater the decrease in the 'vertical' ATD than 'horizontal' ATD.
With this background, it is stated in this article that there was a greater decrease in the 'vertical' ATD index in the unsuccessful patients i.e., 36% at 3 months (as compared to 7% in successful patients). A decrease in the 'vertical' ATD indicates a shear which means a higher type Pauwel's angle (type III). It would have been very useful if the Pauwel's fracture configuration in the unsuccessful patients would have been stated in the article. Now the trend in osteosynthesis is towards using an angle stable implant in Pauwel's type III neck femur fractures rather than pins or screws3,4) to counter the shear. Some even prefer a valgus osteotomy with screws to convert shear into compression.
At this point, I would want to know, if a preoperative CT scan be useful to determine the Pauwel's angle in an undisplaced neck femur fracture5) and then embark on the operative plan rather than waiting for the decrease in 'vertical' ATD in the postoperative period. If the angle is high, a fixed angle implant be preferred over pins at the primary fixation itself.
The age range of participants is 28 to 86 years. Osteomalacia is very common among patients with neck femur fracture.6) The authors have not mentioned the mode of trauma and have not screened any patients, especially with undisplaced neck femur fracture, for osteomalacia. The authors have also not mentioned about any perioperative and postoperative calcium and vitamin D supplementation which affects healing and collapse. Some papers discount the value of vitamin D levels in elderly but calcium supplementation is advisable.
I also wish to suggest the use of AO 6.5 partially threaded cannulated cancellous screws be better than using Knowles pins with sharp pointed tips in osteoporotic bone. The possibility of joint penetration in Fig. 4 in the article could have been possibly averted.
Footnotes
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
- 1.Yoon PW, Shin YH, Yoo JJ, Yoon KS, Kim HJ. Progression of a fracture site impaction as a prognostic indicator of impacted femoral neck fracture treated with multiple pinning. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(1):66–71. doi: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.1.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shimizu T, Miyamoto K, Masuda K, et al. The clinical significance of impaction at the femoral neck fracture site in the elderly. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(7):515–521. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0358-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liporace F, Gaines R, Collinge C, Haidukewych GJ. Results of internal fixation of Pauwels type-3 vertical femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(8):1654–1659. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aminian A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, Zhang LQ, Kalainov DM, Merk BR. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(8):544–548. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31814b822e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yang KH, Han DY, Park HW, Kang HJ, Park JH. Fracture of the ipsilateral neck of the femur in shaft nailing: the role of CT in diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(4):673–678. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b4.8406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pun KK, Wong FH, Wang C, et al. Vitamin D status among patients with fractured neck of femur in Hong Kong. Bone. 1990;11(5):365–368. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(90)90092-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
