Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2012 May 25;2:416. doi: 10.1038/srep00416

The total amounts of radioactively contaminated materials in forests in Fukushima, Japan

Shoji Hashimoto 1,a, Shin Ugawa 1, Kazuki Nanko 1, Koji Shichi 1
PMCID: PMC3360326  PMID: 22639724

Abstract

There has been leakage of radioactive materials from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. A heavily contaminated area (≥ 134, 137Cs 1000 kBq m−2) has been identified in the area northwest of the plant. The majority of the land in the contaminated area is forest. Here we report the amounts of biomass, litter (small organic matter on the surface of the soil), coarse woody litter, and soil in the contaminated forest area. The estimated overall volume and weight were 33 Mm3 (branches, leaves, litter, and coarse woody litter are not included) and 21 Tg (dry matter), respectively. Our results suggest that removing litter is an efficient method of decontamination. However, litter is being continuously decomposed, and contaminated leaves will continue to fall on the soil surface for several years; hence, the litter should be removed promptly but continuously before more radioactive elements are transferred into the soil.

A massive earthquake occurred in eastern Japan on March 11, 2011, and a very large earthquake-induced tsunami washed over the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. The damage to the cooling system of the power plant resulted in several explosions. Radioactive materials leaked as a result of the explosions and the ventilation intended to avoid further explosions. Radioactive contamination has been widely but inhomogeneously found in eastern Japan, even in areas hundreds of kilometres away from the plant1,2,3,4. Airborne surveys revealed that the contamination spread widely, but areas northwest of the plant, from the immediate vicinity of the plant to approximately 60 km away, were found to be notably heavily contaminated (e.g. ≥ 134, 137Cs 1000 kBq m−2)1,2. The two major radioactive elements found to be widely deposited are iodine (131I) and cesium (primarily 134Cs and 137Cs). Because the half-lives of 131I, 134Cs, and 137Cs are 8 days, 2 years, and 30 years, respectively, the decontamination of cesium (especially 137Cs) is now the crucial issue.

The majority of the land in the contaminated area is forest. Forest ecosystems consist of tree biomass (aboveground: boles, branches, and leaves; belowground: roots), small dead organic matter on the soil surface (termed litter), dead trees on the soil surface (termed coarse woody litter), and soil. Litter includes fallen dead leaves and branches and their decomposed materials. Usually, several centimetres of litter cover the surface of the soil, whereas coarse woody litter is very sporadically distributed on the surface. Two independent, preliminary surveys conducted by the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute and Forestry Agency of Japan (FFPRI and FAJ) and by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) revealed that radioactive materials primarily remain in the aboveground tree biomass, litter, and shallow soil (0–0.05 m) in forests5,6. Removing the contaminated components is a potential method of decontamination for forest ecosystems7,8,9. Although the amounts of contaminated forest components are unknown, this information is essential to reveal the extent of the contamination by this tragic, historic nuclear accident and guide decontamination efforts. Here we have estimated the volume and weight of contaminated forest components in the contaminated forest area by combining forest statistics, databases of the distributions of vegetation and soil types, and compilations of data from Japan's forests.

Results

The spatial distributions of forest and soil types are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. The total extent of forest in the area that we defined as heavily contaminated (≥ 134, 137Cs 1000 kBq m−2) was 428 km2, 66% of the area (646 km2), 4% of the forests in Fukushima prefecture, 0.17% of Japan's forests, and 0.11% of Japan's total area. The dominant forest types were deciduous broadleaf forests and evergreen needleleaf forests. The deciduous broadleaf forests were more distributed in the northern part of the region, and the evergreen needleleaf forests were more distributed in the southern part. There was an additional small area of deciduous needleleaf forests. Brown forest soils (Cambisols and Andosols in the classification of the Food and Agriculture Organization), the most widely distributed soil type in Japan, were distributed most widely in this area, and Black soil (Andosols) and Immature soil (Regosols, Arenosols, Fluvisols, and Leptosols) were also found. The Black soil was distributed in the northern part of the region, and Immature soils were found in the southern part.

Figure 1. Distributions of forest type (a) and soil type (b).

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Red diamond indicates the location of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Red line indicates the area that we defined as heavily contaminated. Yellow lines show the borders of the prefectures (local governmental unit in Japan). ENF: evergreen needleleaf forests, EBF: evergreen broadleaf forests, DNF: deciduous needleleaf forests, DBF: deciduous broadleaf forests, MXF: mixed forests, NonF: not forest. B: Brown forest soils, Bl: Black soils, Dr: Dark red soils, G: Gley soils, P: Podzolic soils, Pt: Peaty soils, Im: Immature soils, RY: Red and Yellow soils, RK: Rock and debris, NI: not classified.

Table 1. Forest types and soil types in forests in the radioactively contaminated area.

Forest/soil type Area
  km2
Total forest area 428
Forest types  
Deciduous broadleaf forests 210
Evergreen needleleaf forests 201
Deciduous needleleaf forests 17
Soil types  
Brown forest soils 293
Black soils 70
Immature soils 51
Gley soils 5
Rock and debris 5
NI* 4
Open in a new tab

NI* denotes soils whose classification could not be identified.

The estimated total volume and weight of all of the components were 33 Mm3 and 21 Tg (dry matter), respectively (Table 2; note that only the weight was estimated for the branches, leaves, litter, and coarse woody litter because of the difficulty in estimating their volumes). The dominant components were soil and aboveground tree biomass (Fig. 2 and Table 2). The total volumes and weights of the aboveground tree biomass and soil were 11 and 21 Mm3 and 6 and 13 Tg, respectively. Soil was the single largest component, 1.9 times greater in volume and 2.1 times greater in weight than the aboveground tree biomass. The weight of the litter was 0.5 Tg, and was the smallest component in weight, representing 4% of the soil and 3% of the total.

Table 2. Estimated volumes and weights of the components.

Component Forest/soil type Volume Weight Uncertainty
    Mm3 Tg %
Aboveground tree biomass Deciduous broadleaf forests 4.3 3.4 -
  Evergreen needleleaf forests 6.5 2.5 -
  Deciduous needleleaf forests 0.5 0.3 -
  Total 11.3 6.1 NE*
Litter Deciduous broadleaf forests NE* 0.3 -
  Evergreen needleleaf forests NE* 0.2 -
  Deciduous needleleaf forests NE* 0.0 -
  Total NE* 0.5 74
Coarse woody litter Deciduous broadleaf forests NE* 0.2 -
  Evergreen needleleaf forests NE* 0.9 -
  Deciduous needleleaf forests NE* 0.0 -
  Total NE* 1.1 70
Soil Brown forest soils 14.7 8.6 -
  Black soils 3.5 1.6 -
  Immature soils 2.6 2.3 -
  Gley soils 0.3 0.2 -
  Rock and debris 0.3 0.2 -
  NI 0.2 0.1 -
  Total 21.4 12.9 22
Total Total 32.7 20.7 -
Open in a new tab

NE*: not estimated. The volumes of the branches, leaves, litter, and coarse woody litter were not estimated because of their complex shapes; thus, branches and leaves were not included in the volume of the aboveground tree biomass. The uncertainty of the aboveground tree biomass was not evaluated, as the uncertainty of the parameters used to calculate aboveground tree biomass was not reported.

Figure 2. Estimated total volumes and weights of radioactively contaminated components.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

AB: aboveground tree biomass, L: litter, CWL: coarse woody litter. NE: not estimated. Branches and leaves were not included in the volume of aboveground tree biomass.

Discussion

The preliminary surveys conducted in August and September 2011 by FFPRI and FAJ revealed that the concentration of cesium (total of 134Cs and 137Cs) in the litter component ranged from 24.1 to 319 kBq kg–1 and the proportion of cesium in the litter component ranged from 22% to 66% of the total cesium in the forest ecosystems at this stage and suggest that removing litter could be an efficient method of decontamination, especially for deciduous forests (please note that the surveys were conducted in Fukushima but outside of our study site)5. According to the report, the contribution of the litter component was low for Japanese cedar forests (Cryptomeria japonica; evergreen needleleaf forests) and high for deciduous oak forests (Quercus serrata; deciduous broadleaf forests). This difference likely occurred because the trees in the deciduous forests did not have leaves (i.e., were at a stage prior to leafing) when the radioactive materials were discharged (March 2011). In terms of the amount of materials to be removed, our results indicate that removing the litter component from forest ecosystems is an efficient method of decontamination.

However, we should note that the litter component is being continuously decomposed and that the decomposed litter is continuously transferred into the soil component. The average decomposition constant (exponential decay constant) of the litter in Japanese forests, determined through field experiments, is approximately 0.41 yr−1 (ref. 10). This value indicates that 30–40% of the litter on the soil surface will be decomposed each year. Thus, most of the trapped cesium in the litter component will move into the soil in a few years, and therefore, the litter component should be removed promptly11. Furthermore, the decomposition of the litter increases exponentially with increasing temperature12. During the winter, litter decomposition is inhibited by low temperatures, but the decomposition will accelerate with increasing temperatures during the spring. Such a transfer of cesium from litter to soil was reported in the Chernobyl forests13,14,15. In the evergreen needleleaf forests, the trapped cesium in the litter component is not currently as high as that in the deciduous broadleaf forests. The leaves on the trees still retain approximately 40% of the total cesium in the forests5. The average longevity of the leaves of the dominant species in evergreen needleleaf forests in Japan (Japanese cedar, Cryptomeria japonica) is approximately 5 years16. Hence, contaminated leaves will continue to fall on the soil surface during and after the next 5 years. In addition, the cesium trapped on the leaves would serve as a source of cesium transfer from the biomass to the forest floor via water flow17. To effectively decontaminate the forests by removing litter, prompt but continuous effort is needed.

When the contaminated components are removed, storage space for a substantial quantity of contaminated materials is required. The aboveground tree biomass, litter, and coarse woody litter components are incinerable, and incineration can reduce the volume and weight of these components. We estimated the volume and weight of the ash that would result if these three components are incinerated. The estimated weight was 0.1 Tg, approximately 1% of the soil component (see Supplementary Information). Furthermore, if the ash is compacted, the volume will be 0.3% of the volume of the soil component. For the soil component, the volume may be reduced; the surface soils in forests are in general looser (or have a lower bulk density) than compacted soils. If those loose soils can be compacted as dense soils, the volume will be reduced by 70% (see Supplementary Information).

The preliminary survey conducted by FFPRI and FAJ reported that approximately 20% of the radioactive cesium was already in the soil component5. This finding suggests that if we remove the aboveground tree biomass, litter, and coarse woody litter at this stage, we can decontaminate approximately 80% of the radioactive materials in the contaminated area. Our estimates demonstrate that storing these three components is more efficient than storing the soil component because these three components consume less space than the soil. Nevertheless, cutting the trees in such an extensive area would not be an easy task. In addition, cutting trees over an extensive area may cause serious soil erosion and landslides. In contrast, incinerating the contaminated components themselves could provide an energy source for performing the decontamination18, although we are aware that the incineration of radioactively contaminated materials without leakage of radioactive elements to the atmosphere may not be feasible. Nevertheless, our results imply that the amount of litter is relatively very small. We therefore emphasise that the key component for efficient decontamination is the litter.

The distribution pattern of the contamination is very inhomogeneous; highly contaminated areas are located irregularly outside the area we focused on. However, we believe that our study provides approximate estimates of the amount of radioactively contaminated materials in forests. Depending on the balance of costs and benefits, our estimates may suggest that certain sites should be left without decontamination, and we believe that this choice is one of the options that should be courageously discussed. According to a report on the Chernobyl accident, forest decontaminations are potentially labour intensive and expensive19. Furthermore, it was indicated in studies of the forests contaminated by the Chernobyl accident that the circulation of radioactive elements (soil-plant) reached a quasi-equilibrium within a few years after the accident and that the forest retained radioactive elements, with only a small loss of radioactive elements from the forest ecosystems20,21,22. However, it is expected that the dynamics of radioactive elements differ depending on the level of contamination, ecosystems (tree species and soil types), climate, and topography23,24. Therefore, it should be emphasised that the detailed monitoring of the migration of the radioactive elements between the components in forest ecosystems and between different land types (e.g., from forests to arable lands) is vital. We hope that our study facilitates the prompt and efficient decontamination of forests in Fukushima.

Methods

We combined forest statistics, databases of the distributions of the vegetation and soil types (1-km resolution), and compilations of data observed in Japan. The volumes and weights of the aboveground tree biomass, litter, coarse woody litter, and shallow soil (0–0.05 m) were estimated. From a radiation map from MEXT obtained by an airborne survey in November 2011, we defined the contaminated area (≥ 134, 137Cs 1000 kBq m−2 ) (ref. 1,2). We multiplied the area of each forest or soil type by the average stock per area of each component and summed the values. The distributions of the vegetation and soil types were derived from the Japan Integrated Biodiversity Information System (J-IBIS) (ref. 25) and the National Land Numerical Information26. The forest area and stock were obtained from forest statistics27,28. The parameters for calculating the aboveground tree biomass were derived from the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan 2011 (ref. 29). The average stocks of litter and coarse woody litter were obtained from a study representing a compilation of information on Japanese forest soils30. The bulk densities of soils were obtained from a soil data browsing system31,32. The equation for the uncertainty assessment is from the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan 2011 (ref. 29). The detailed equations are given below, and all parameters and calculations are included in the Supplementary Information.

For aboveground tree biomass,

graphic file with name srep00416-m1.jpg
graphic file with name srep00416-m2.jpg

where VAB is the total volume of the aboveground bole biomass (Mm3), Vi is the average bole biomass of forest type i (m3 m–2), and Ai is the area of forest type i (km2). WAB is the total weight of the aboveground tree biomass including boles, branches, and leaves (Tg), Di is the wood density of the bole (Mg m–3), and BEFi is the biomass expansion factor (the factor to estimate the aboveground total biomass from bole biomass) of forest type i (ratio). We derived average bole stock data for artificial and natural forests in Fukushima from forest statistics28. The weight-based ash ratios of aboveground tree biomass are 0.5% for broadleaf forests and 0.4% for needleleaf forests33.

For litter,

graphic file with name srep00416-m3.jpg

where WL is the weight of litter (Tg) and MLi is the mean stock in litter of forest type i (kg m−2). The volume of litter was not estimated due to its complex shape. The ash ratios of litter were assumed to be 14.7% for deciduous broadleaf forests and 23.6% for evergreen and deciduous needleleaf forests34.

For coarse woody litter,

graphic file with name srep00416-m4.jpg

where WCWL is the weight of coarse woody litter (Tg) and MCi is the mean stock in coarse woody litter of forest type i (kg m−2). The volume of coarse woody litter was not estimated because of its complex shape. The ash ratio for coarse woody litter was assumed to be 0.4% (Y. Sakai (Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Japan), personal communication).

The compacted volumes of the ash were calculated as follows:

graphic file with name srep00416-m5.jpg
graphic file with name srep00416-m6.jpg
graphic file with name srep00416-m7.jpg

where CAVAB, CAVL, and CAVCWL are the compacted volumes of the ash of the aboveground tree biomass, litter, and coarse woody litter, respectively (Mm3), AWAB, AWL, and AWCWL are the weights of the ash of the aboveground tree biomass, litter, and coarse woody litter, respectively (Tg), and dAB , dL, and dCWL are the bulk densities of the respective compacted ash (Mg m−3). We used a bulk density of 2 Mg m−3 based on the bulk density of the compacted soils.

For soil,

graphic file with name srep00416-m8.jpg
graphic file with name srep00416-m9.jpg

where VSoil and WSoil are the volume (Mm3) and weight (Tg) of the soil component, Z is the depth (0.05 m), and BDj is the bulk density of each soil type (kg m−2).

The compacted volume of the soil was calculated as follows:

graphic file with name srep00416-m10.jpg

where CVSoil is the compacted volume of the soil (Mm3) and dSoil is the bulk density of the compacted soil (Mg m−3). We assumed a bulk density of 2 Mg m−3 based on the maximum bulk density of the soil.

Author Contributions

S.H. designed the study and wrote the manuscript with input from all other authors. S.H. and S.U. collected data and conducted the calculations. K.N. conducted the GIS analyses.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

SupplementaryInformation

srep00416-s1.pdf (157.9KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Kenji Ono and Kenzo Tanaka (Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Japan) for valuable discussions.

References

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology: Detailed Distribution Map of Radiation Dose/Cyber National Land [In Japanese] <http://ramap.jaea.go.jp/map/> (2012).
  2. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology: Results of the Fourth Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT <http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/old/en/1270/2011/12/1270_1216.pdf> (2012).
  3. Kinoshita N. et al. Assessment of individual radionuclide distributions from the Fukushima nuclear accident covering central-east Japan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19526–19529 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yasunari T. J. et al. Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19530–19534 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forestry Agency of Japan: Preliminary Results of Surveys of Distributions of Radioactive Elements in Forest Ecosystems [In Japanese] <http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/press/hozen/111227_2.html> (2012).
  6. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology: Distribution Map of Radiation Dose around Fukushima Dai-ichi & Dai-Ni NPP (Soil Contamination) [In Japanese] <http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/old/ja/distribution_map_around_FukushimaNPP/> (2012).
  7. Amiro B., Greben'kov A. & Vandenhove H. in Contaminated Forests: Countermeasures and Risks Associated with Contaminated Forests. (ed. Linkov I., & Schell W. R.) 395–401 (Kluwer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  8. Guillitte O. et al. Decontamination methods for reducing radiation doses arising from radioactive contamination of forest ecosystems — a summary of available countermeasures. Sci. Total Environ. 137, 307–314 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  9. Guillitte O., Tikhomirov F. A., Shaw G. & Vetrov V. Principles and practices of countermeasures to be carried out following radioactive contamination of forest areas. Sci. Total Environ. 157, 399–406 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  10. Ono K., Hiradate S., Morita S. & Hirai K. Fate of organic carbon during decomposition of different litter types in Japan. Biogeochemistry. 10.1007/s10533-011-9682-z (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. Tikhomirov F. A., Shcheglov A. I. & Sidorov V. P. Forests and forestry: radiation protection measures with special reference to the Chernobyl accident zone. Sci. Total Environ. 137, 289–305 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fierer N., Craine J. M., McLauchlan K. & Schimel J. P. Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition. Ecology 86, 320–326 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  13. Shcheglov A. I. in Contaminated Forests: Dynamics of Radionuclide Redistribution and Pathways in Forest Environments: Long-Term Field Research in Different Landscapes (ed. Linkov I., & Schell W. R.) 23–39 (Kluwer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  14. Krasnov V. P. in Contaminated Forests: The Direction and Intensity of 137Cs Fluxes in Forest Ecosystems (ed. Linkov I., & Schell W. R.) 71–76 (Kluwer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  15. Tikhomirov F. A. & Shcheglov A. I. Main investigation results on the forest radioecology in the Kyshtym and Chernobyl accident zones. Sci. Total Environ. 157, 45–57 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cannell M. G. R. World Forest Biomass and Primary Production Data (Academic, 1982). [Google Scholar]
  17. Klyashtorin A. L. in Contaminated Forests: Peculiarities of 137Cs Vertical Migration in Pine Ecosystem with Stem Flow, Throughfall, Litterfall, and Infiltration(ed. Linkov I., & Schell W. R.) 77–84 (Kluwer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  18. Grebenkov A. J. et al. in Contaminated Forests: Biomass-Into-Energy Options for Contaminated Forest in Belarus and Relevant Risk Issues (ed. Linkov I., & Schell W. R.) 289–301 (Kluwer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  19. International Atomic Energy Agency: Summary Report of the Preliminary Findings of the IAEA Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP <http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fukushima/pre_report.pdf> (2012).
  20. Kutlakhmedov Y., Davydchuk V., Arapis G. & Kutlakhmedova-Vyshnyakova V. in Contaminated Forests: Radiocapacity of Forest Ecosystems (ed. Linkov I., & Schell W. R.) 51–61 (Kluwer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  21. International Atomic Energy Agency: Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience <http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/pub1239_web.pdf> (2012).
  22. Ertel J. & Ziegler H. Cs-134/137 contamination and root uptake of different forest trees before and after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 30, 147–157 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kliashtorin A. L., Tikhomirov F. A. & Shcheglov A. I. Vertical radionuclide transfer by infiltration water in forest soils in the 30-km Chernobyl accident zone. Sci. Total Environ. 157, 285–288 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Arapis G., Daskalakis D. & Godora A. in Contaminated Forests: Behaviour of 137Cs in Sloping Semi-Natural Ecosystems in Greece. (ed. Linkov I., & Schell W. R.) 113–119 (Kluwer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ministry of the Environment: Japan Integrated Biodiversity Information System—Fifth Survey <http://www.biodic.go.jp/english/J-IBIS.html> (2012).
  26. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism: National Land Numerical Information <http://nlftp.mlit.go.jp/ksj-e/index.html> (2012).
  27. Forestry Agency of Japan. . Forest and Forestry Statistics Directory 2011 [In Japanese] (Forestry Agency of Japan, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  28. Forestry Agency of Japan: Forest Resource Monitoring Survey [In Japanese] <http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/keikaku/monitar/index.html> (2012).
  29. Ministry of the Environment, Japan, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Office of Japan, CGER, NIES: National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of JAPAN <http://www-gio.nies.go.jp/aboutghg/nir/nir-e.html> (2012).
  30. Takahashi M. et al. Carbon stock in litter, deadwood and soil in Japan's forest sector and its comparison with carbon stock in agricultural soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutri. 56, 19–30 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  31. Hashimoto S., Morishita T., Sakata T. & Ishizuka S. Increasing trends of soil greenhouse gas fluxes in Japanese forests from 1980 to 2009. Sci. Rep. 1, doi:10.1038/srep00116 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Morisada K., Ono K. & Kanomata H. Organic carbon stock in forest soils in Japan. Geoderma 119, 21–32 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  33. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Japan. . Handbook for Wood Processing Industry [In Japanese] (Maruzen, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  34. Ono K., Miki K., Amari M. & Hirai K. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for the determination of lignin-derived compounds in the decomposed and humified litters of coniferous and deciduous temperate forests in northern Kanto district, central Japan. Soil Sci. Plant Nutri. 54, 188–196 (2008). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

SupplementaryInformation

srep00416-s1.pdf (157.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES