Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Nutr. 2011 Jan;105(1):123–132. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510003053

Redox-modulatory vitamins and minerals that prospectively predict mortality in older British people: the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 years and over

Christopher J Bates 1,*, Mark Hamer 2, Gita D Mishra 2
PMCID: PMC3361131  EMSID: UKMS47830  PMID: 20807458

Abstract

The predictive power, for total, vascular, cancer and respiratory mortality, of selected redox-modulatory (vitamin and mineral nutrient) indices measured at baseline, was studied in the British National Diet and Nutrition Survey (community-living subset) of people aged 65 years and over. Mortality status and its primary and underlying causes were recorded for 1054 (mean age 76·6 (SD 7·4) years and 49·0 % female) participants, from the baseline survey in 1994–5 until September 2008. During this interval, 74 % of the male and 62 % of the female participants died. Total mortality was significantly predicted by baseline plasma concentrations (per SD) of vitamin C (hazard ratio (HR) 0·81; 95 % CI 0·74, 0·88), α-carotene (HR 0·90; 95 % CI 0·81, 0·99), Se (HR 0·76; 95 % CI 0·69, 0·84), Zn (HR 0·79; 95 % CI 0·72, 0·87), Cu (HR 1·27; 95 % CI 1·14, 1·42) and Fe (HR 0·81; 95 % CI 0·74, 0·89). Total mortality was also significantly predicted by baseline dietary intakes (per SD) of food energy (HR 0·86; 95 % CI 0·79, 0·94), vitamin C (HR 0·88; 95 % CI 0·80, 0·94), carotenoids (HR 0·89; 95 % CI 0·83, 0·96), Zn (HR 0·89; 95 % CI 0·82, 0·96) and Cu (HR 0·91; 95 % CI 0·84, 1·00). Prediction patterns and significance for primary vascular, cancer and respiratory mortality differed in certain respects, but not fundamentally. Model adjustment for known disease or mortality risk predictors resulted in loss of significance for some of the indices; however, plasma Se and Zn, and food energy remained significant predictors. We conclude that total and primary vascular, cancer and respiratory mortality in older British people of both sexes is predicted by several biochemical indices of redox-modulatory nutrients, some of which may reflect the respondents’ acute-phase status at baseline, whereas others may reflect the healthiness of their lifestyle.

Keywords: British National Survey of Older Adults, Mortality prediction, Intakes and biochemical indices, Plasma vitamins C and E, carotenoids, selenium, zinc, copper, iron


Relationships between biochemical status indices and later morbidity and mortality experience can help to predict causal relationships, and thereby to clarify certain physiological and pathological mechanisms that may be related to important disease risk factors in ageing humans. In the present study, we have focused on mortality outcomes of the community-living participants from the countrywide British National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 years and over, for which the fieldwork was performed in 1994–5(1). Subsequent mortality outcomes were available from the National Health Service register of deaths, up to September 2008. The purpose of the present paper is to explore the predictive significance of a selection of biochemical indices for nutrients that are believed to mediate redox-modulatory (antioxidant or pro-oxidant) functions in living tissues, all of which were measured as part of the original population surveillance protocol. Evidence that subsequent all-cause mortality may be predicted by vitamin C intakes and/or status has been obtained in several previous studies(210), and similarly for carotene(11,12) and Se(1214).

In addition to the modulation of redox status, several nutrient indices are known to be modified by, and hence to reflect, acute-phase status, and hence, potentially, to reflect mortality risk (since chronic inflammatory states frequently underlie those disease processes that lead ultimately to death(15)). Also, the same vitamins and minerals that modulate redox status may, in many cases, also modulate key immune functions(1618). As well as the practical usefulness of status indices as predictors of future mortality, a key question is whether the observed links between baseline nutrient status and future mortality are likely to be driven by (potentially correctable) nutritional imbalances, or by the more intractable processes of inflammatory response to chronic disease?

Subjects and methods

The survey procedures have been described in detail elsewhere(1); therefore only a brief summary is given here. At baseline, in 1994–5, two separate population samples were randomly selected: one from community-living people aged 65 years and over and the other from long-stay institutions. Only the community-living sample has been included in the present study. Participants were drawn from eighty randomly selected postcode sectors in mainland Britain and allocated to four sequential 3-month fieldwork ‘waves’ corresponding to the four seasons, beginning in October 1994. Demographic, socio-economic and other information was obtained by a trained interviewer in the participant’s home. A 4 d weighed dietary record was also obtained by the interviewer, and anthropometric indices, blood pressure and pulse rate, and after separate consent, a fasting early morning venous blood sample were taken by a trained nurse. The blood sample was subdivided and used for a wide range of analyses. Of these, the assays that are relevant to the present study were as follows: (a) fluorometric assay based on the reaction of dehydroascorbic acid with ortho-phenylenediamine (checked for validity against a HPLC assay and against quality assurance standards with assigned values, provided by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology) for plasma (total) vitamin C; (b) liquid chromatographic assay for plasma retinol, α- and γ-tocopherols and carotenoids; (c) colorimetric assays for plasma Zn, Cu, Fe and Fe% saturation of transferrin; (d) an antibody-based nephelometric assay for plasma α1-antichymotrypsin; (e) an inductively coupled plasma MS assay for plasma Se. In-house quality assessments and inter-laboratory exchanges were undertaken in order to monitor the accuracy and stability of the assays. Plasma α1-antichymotrypsin was selected as a medium-duration plasma acute-phase indicator, which tends to remain raised during chronic inflammatory states. Between-run quality-control sample CV were all ≤ 11 %, and the mean quality-control CV was 5·7 %.

The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Local Research Ethics Committees representing each of the eighty postcode sectors used. The protocol was also approved by the Ethical Committee of the MRC Dunn Nutrition Unit (of which the Micronutrient Status Laboratory is now part of MRC Human Nutrition Research), in Cambridge. Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects.

The present study included 1054 participants, comprising 538 men and 516 women, with partial or complete data available for the analyses of interest here, all of whom agreed to be flagged on the National Register of Births and Deaths, and whose status (i.e. as still alive or registered as having died) was known in September 2008. No exclusions, other than those resulting from willingness to participate or the availability of blood samples, were imposed, and there was no evidence for sampling bias. Because of missing values (principally due to incomplete consent availability for the blood sampling), the analyses of the blood biomarker variables are typically based on a subset of approximately 800 participants.

Statistical analysis

Cox proportional hazards models were used, with years of survival as the time scale, to estimate the risk of mortality (all-cause and vascular disease) according to each biochemical and nutritional index. The data were censored to September 2008 in those participants who had survived. The proportional hazards assumption was examined by comparing the cumulative hazard plots, grouped as exposure, wherein no appreciable violations were observed. We used standardised values (z-scores) for each of the explanatory variables examined, which have the advantage of expressing the hazard ratios per standard deviation, rather than per measurement unit, thereby achieving an enhanced conformity between the disparate indices. Vascular disease mortality was defined according to International Classification of Diseases – versions 9 (ICD-9: 390-459) and 10 (ICD-10: I01-I99). Cancer mortality was defined according to ICD-9: 140-239 and ICD-10: C00-D48. Respiratory disease mortality was defined according to ICD-9: 460-519 and ICD-10: J00-J99, and all of the above were limited to the primary cause of death.

In the multivariate models, adjustment was made for potential confounders, including age and sex in all models. Since we were only interested in relationships between indices, rather than estimates of prevalence, we did not apply the weighting factors that were used in the data analyses for the Survey Report(1). All tests of statistical significance were based on two-sided probability, and P<0·05 was deemed significant throughout.

Results

Of the community-living survey participants who gave consent for follow-up flagging of the National Health Service Register of deaths, and who had provided at least one index value reported in this follow-up study, 94·5 % could be accounted for by known deaths and known survivors. As noted previously in the Subjects and methods section, the blood biomarker analyses are confined to the subset of the participants who provided a blood sample, comprising approximately 800 participants.

Table 1 provides mean and median baseline values, subdivided by sex, for the indices explored in this report. The original Survey Report(1) provided baseline index values for all of the original survey participants, together with further details about the aims of the selection procedures and the methodologies used.

Table 1.

Summary of selected status indices and nutrient intakes in the survey respondents who are included in the present study (n 1054)

(Mean values and standard deviations; median and range values)

Male
Female
n * Mean SD Median Range n * Mean SD Median Range
Age (years) 538 75·8 6·9 75·0 65–96 516 77·3 7·9 76·0 65–99
Body wt (kg) 532 75·2 12·2 74·6 38·7–121 509 64·0 12·7 63·3 32·5–112·9
Ht (m) 528 1·69 0·07 1·69 1·49–1·98 503 1·55 0·07 1·55 1·20–1·75
BMI (kg/m2) 527 26·3 3·7 26·1 16·3–43·2 502 26·6 4·8 26·2 14·4–44·6
Biochemical indices Plasma vitamin C (μmol/l) 442 38·2 22·6 38·6 <3–101·5 410 45·8 26·1 48·2 <3–116·5
 Plasma vitamin A (μmol/l) 409 2·21 0·58 2·15 0·85–5·55 390 2·18 0·66 2·09 0·42–6·8
 Plasma α-tocopherol (μmol/l) 409 35·0 9·9 34·2 0·45–7·49 390 39·1 12·4 37·5 10·3–128·0
 Plasma γ-tocopherol (μmol/l) 407 2·24 1·06 2·07 0·45–7·49 385 2·53 1·20 2·31 0·57–8·65
 Plasma α-carotene (nmol/l) 403 64·0 64·0 51·0 5·0–84·8 385 79·5 84·4 55·0 4·0–88·8
 Plasma β-carotene (nmol/l) 408 323 225 273 8–1674 390 405 261 349 37–1960
 Plasma β-cryptoxanthin (nmol/l) 399 117 121 77 3–866 389 151 165 98 4–1265
 Plasma lutein + zeaxanthin (nmol/l) 409 378 179 340 99–1583 390 389 212 352 66–2189
 Plasma lycopene (nmol/l) 408 268 184 238 12–1015 389 274 209 225 8–1262
 Plasma Se (μmol/l) 428 95 218 962 375–2376 398 924 211 925 461–1786
 Blood glutathione peroxidase
  (nmol NADPH/mg Hb per min)
412 140 34 133 59–359 369 145 37 13 85–353
 Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 377 14·2 2·1 14·1 7·2–20·5 364 14·2 2·4 14·0 8·2–24·2
 Plasma Cu (μmol/l) 376 17·4 3·0 17·0 10·4–31·5 362 19·5 3·9 19·3 8·4–38·0
 Plasma Fe (μmol/l) 438 13·7 4·9 13·0 2·8–37·4 412 12·0 4·4 11·9 2·2–32·3
 Plasma Fe % saturation (%) 437 28·1 11·1 26·7 4·1–91·2 412 24·2 10·3 23·5 4·0–82·7
 Plasma α1-antichymotrypsin (g/l) 430 0·38 0·094 0·365 0·16–1·14 408 0·39 0·089 0·385 0·22–1·01
Estimated average daily dietary intakes
 Energy (MJ) 538 7·95 1·94 7·95 3·44–17·3 516 5·95 1·42 5·88 1·91–9·77
 Vitamin C (mg) 538 71·1 70·5 59·0 4·9–1023 516 65·4 57·1 49·0 1·0–601
 Vitamin A (retinol) (mg) 538 0·94 1·76 0·45 <0·01–20·4 516 0·85 1·56 0·39 0·06–18·8
 Vitamin E (mg) 538 9·51 8·18 7·80 0·8–114 516 10·69 39·4 6·09 0·06–18·8
 Total carotenoids (mg) 538 1·97 1·55 1·62 0·10–12·0 516 1·62 1·40 1·12 0·06–9·97
 Zn (mg) 538 8·81 2·86 8·50 1·86–27·1 516 6·96 2·56 6·52 1·65–23·3
 Cu (mg) 538 1·10 0·68 0·97 0·29–6·72 516 0·88 0·55 0·77 0·19–5·87
 Non-haem Fe (mg) 538 11·4 10·3 10·0 1·7–174·2 516 10·9 18·4 7·9 2·3–201·5
 Haem Fe (mg) 538 0·72 0·57 0·59 0·00–4·83 516 0·53 0·45 0·42 0·00–4·80
*

The values for n in Table 1 and the maximum values for n in Tables 2 and 3 are limited to the numbers definitely known to have died or to have been still alive at the time of the follow-up analysis, i.e. they excluded those (approximately 5% of the original participants) who were lost to follow-up. Where individual index values of n are lower in Tables 2 and 3, it was because of missing values, since not all of the respondents provided blood (or sufficient blood) for every one of the assays or calculations(1).

Table 2 shows the age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause and primary vascular disease-cause mortality. Significant predictors of all-cause mortality were as follows: plasma vitamin C, α-carotene, lutein + zeaxanthin, Se, Zn, Cu, Fe (and the % saturation of its carrier, Fe-binding protein or transferrin); plasma α1-antichymotrypsin, and dietary intakes of energy, vitamin C, carotenoids, Zn and Cu. With the exception of plasma Cu and α1-antichymotrypsin, all of the significant mortality predictors had hazard ratios below 1·0, which signifies reduced risk. α1-Antichymotrypsin concentrations are known to increase during inflammatory states, and hence the association of increased concentrations with increased risk, i.e. hazard ratios greater than 1·0. The major Cu-containing plasma protein, caeruloplasmin, like α1-antichymotrypsin, also increases during inflammatory states, which probably explains the observed association of increased concentrations with increased risk. Serum ferritin (not shown) was not a significant predictor of mortality, either for all-cause or for the three subcategories of mortality risk considered here. Likewise, neither α-tocopherol nor γ-tocopherol became significant predictors, for all-cause, vascular disease or cancer mortality, even when adjusted for plasma (total) cholesterol (not shown). Intakes of food energy, vitamin C, total carotenoids, Zn and Cu were significant predictors of mortality, with increased intakes being associated with longer survival for each of these nutrients (Table 2). If food energy was included in the model (not shown), then vitamin C and carotenoid intakes still retained their prediction significance (P=0·003 and 0·046, respectively), whereas the other nutrient intakes shown in Table 2 lost their significance (P<0·05).

Table 2.

Age- and sex-adjusted risk for the biochemical and nutritional indices, for all-cause and primary vascular disease mortality*

(Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals)

All-cause mortality: died n 717, alive n 337
Vascular disease mortality: died n 189, alive n 337*
Age- and sex-adjusted
hazard ratios
95% CI P Age- and sex-adjusted
hazard ratios
95% CI P
Biochemical indices (per SD)
 Plasma vitamin C (μmol/l) 0·81 0·74, 0·88 <0·001 0·83 0·71, 0·98 0·02
 Plasma vitamin A (μmol/l) 0·96 0·87, 1·06 0·4 1·01 0·84, 1·21 0·9
 Plasma α-tocopherol (μmol/l) 0·96 0·87, 1·06 0·4 1·07 0·90, 1·29 0·4
 Plasma γ-tocopherol (μmol/l) 0·96 0·87, 1·05 0·3 0·91 0·75, 1·11 0·4
 Plasma α-carotene (nmol/l) 0·90 0·81, 0·99 0·04 1·01 0·85, 1·20 0·9
 Plasma β-carotene (nmol/l) 0·92 0·84, 1·01 0·08 0·96 0·81, 1·15 0·7
 Plasma β-cryptoxanthin (nmol/l) 0·91 0·83, 1·01 0·07 1·04 0·86, 1·26 0·7
 Plasma lutein + zeaxanthin (nmol/l) 0·91 0·83, 1·00 0·04 0·90 0·75, 1·08 0·3
 Plasma lycopene (nmol/l) 0·92 0·84, 1·01 0·09 0·86 0·71, 1·05 0·15
 Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·76 0·69, 0·84 <0·001 0·73 0·61, 0·87 0·001
 Blood glutathione peroxidase
  (nmol NADPH/mg Hb per min)
0·94 0·85, 1·03 0·2 1·00 0·84, 1·20 1·0
 Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·79 0·72, 0·87 <0·001 0·73 0·61, 0·88 0·001
 Plasma Cu (μmol/l) 1·27 1·14, 1·42 <0·001 1·35 1·12, 1·63 0·002
 Plasma Fe (μmol/l) 0·81 0·74, 0·89 <0·001 0·79 0·67, 0·94 0·008
 Plasma Fe % saturation (%) 0·84 0·76, 0·92 <0·001 0·79 0·67, 0·94 0·009
 Plasma α1-antichymotrypsin (g/l) 1·22 1·14, 1·32 <0·001 1·12 1·05, 1·35 0·005
Daily dietary intakes (per SD)
 Energy (MJ) 0·86 0·79, 0·94 0·001 0·83 0·70, 1·00 0·05
 Vitamin C (mg) 0·88 0·80, 0·97 0·008 0·93 0·81, 1·08 0·4
 Vitamin A (mg) 1·00 0·93, 1·07 1·0 0·95 0·82, 1·10 0·5
 Vitamin E (mg) 1·00 0·93, 1·08 0·9 1·06 0·90, 1·23 0·5
 Total carotenoids (mg) 0·89 0·82, 0·96 0·003 0·95 0·83, 1·10 0·5
 Zn (mg) 0·89 0·82, 0·96 0·003 0·84 0·71, 0·99 0·04
 Cu (mg) 0·91 0·84, 1·00 0·04 0·92 0·78, 1·10 0·4
 Non-haem Fe (mg) 1·03 0·94, 1·13 0·5 1·06 0·94, 1·20 0·4
 Haem Fe (mg) 1·03 0·97, 1·10 0·3 0·93 0·82, 1·07 0·3
*

As explained in the legend to Table 1, these were the study maximum values for n; the actual values for each index were the same as shown in Table 1.

When subdivided by sex (not shown), the predictive power of the biochemical status indices was similar for both men and women, with the exception of plasma Cu, which was significant only for men (hazard ratio 1·60 (95 % CI 1·35, 1·90) (P≤0·001)) compared with women (hazard ratio 1·06 (95 % CI 0·93, 1·22) (P=0·4)). The predictive power of nutrient intakes was significant (P<0·05) for men for food energy, vitamins C and E, carotenoids, Zn and Cu, but was NS for women, for any of these nutrient intakes. After adjustment for food energy, intakes of vitamin C and carotenoids remained significant for men (P=0·03 for both).

For primary vascular disease mortality, comprising approximately 26 % of all mortality, the significant predictors were similar to those for all-cause mortality; however, plasma α-carotene, lutein + zeaxanthin and dietary energy, and intakes of carotenoids and Cu failed to achieve significance at the 5 % probability level here.

For primary cancer mortality, comprising approximately 20 % of all mortality, the significant biochemical index predictors were similar to those for all-cause mortality, with the exceptions that plasma lutein + zeaxanthin, Cu and α1-antichymotrypsin were NS. Here, the only dietary intakes that were significant were those of vitamins C and E.

For primary respiratory disease mortality, comprising approximately 16 % of all mortality, the significant biochemical index predictors were similar to those for all-cause mortality, with the exception that plasma α-carotene, Cu, Fe and α1-antichymotrypsin were NS, but lycopene became marginally significant. The only dietary intake to achieve significance here was that of total carotenoids.

When subdivided both by sex and by primary cause of mortality (not shown), the most striking sex differences again arose with respect to plasma Cu, which was a significant predictor of primary vascular disease or cancer or respiratory disease mortality, for males only, but not for females. Dietary intake of vitamin E was a significant predictor of cancer and respiratory disease mortality in males but not in females, and dietary intake of carotenoids was a significant predictor of respiratory disease mortality in males but not in females. However, in contrast to previous studies which have described significant mortality prediction by low serum or plasma vitamin C concentrations in men but not in women(2,68), the present study found similar strengths of mortality prediction by plasma vitamin C in both men and women.

About 19 % of the study respondents were regularly taking dietary supplements that contained vitamin and/or mineral components, at baseline. However, subsequent mortality was not significantly predicted by the supplemental intakes of any of the above-mentioned vitamins or minerals, and the mortality prediction patterns were similar in the (81 %) non-supplement users, to those of the entire cohort (not shown).

Exclusion of those respondents (approximately 7 %) who died in less than 2 years after the baseline fieldwork made little difference to any of the index predictions of mortality (not shown); therefore the observed patterns of mortality prediction appear not to have been disproportionately affected by early deaths, and hence by the effects of serious illness on appetite or status indices at baseline.

Tables 47 show which of the nutrient indices survive into multivariate models: part (a) in each table contains just age, sex, and each single status and dietary indices that were found to be significant as shown in Tables 2 and 3; part (b) contains all of the significantly predictive nutrient variables plus age and sex, followed by removal of those which then became non-significant in the multivariate model; part (c) contains these same indices, plus five further ‘risk’ indices that were measured at baseline, namely: α1-antichymotrypsin (acute-phase status indicator), plasma creatinine (renal status indicator), plasma total and HDL-cholesterol concentrations (traditional vascular disease risk indicators), plasma albumin concentration (frailty indicator); and finally part (d) also contains BMI, systolic blood pressure, current smoking index, number of prescribed drugs being taken, self-reported health score, physical activity score and receipt (or not) of certain state benefits (a potential index of relative poverty). For all-cause mortality (Table 4), only the mineral status indices (for Se, Zn, Cu and Fe) plus dietary energy remained significant in the partly adjusted multivariate model (b), with only plasma Se, Zn and dietary energy surviving to the fully adjusted model (d). In Tables 5 and 6, somewhat similar patterns were observed for primary vascular and primary cancer mortality; however, for the latter (alone), haem Fe was a significant predictor, and indeed, became progressively more significant in the more fully adjusted multivariate models. Dietary vitamin E (but not dietary energy) was significant for cancer mortality. From Table 7, it can be observed that only plasma α-tocopherol and dietary carotenoids were significant predictors for respiratory disease mortality. It can be observed from Tables 47 that for some of the nutritional variables and mortality types, there was a steady progression towards decreasing significance of mortality prediction in the more fully adjusted models, whereas for other nutritional variables and mortality types, the prediction significance either stayed essentially the same or even increased in the more fully adjusted models.

Table 4.

Multivariate hazard ratios for nutritional indices and intakes for all-cause mortality

(Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals)

Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P
Model (a): died n 717, alive n 357*
Model (b): died n 482, alive n 242
Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·76 0·69, 0·84 <0·001 0·82 0·73, 0·91 <0·001
Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·79 0·72, 0·87 <0·001 0·84 0·76, 0·93 0·001
Plasma Cu (μmol/l) 1·27 1·14, 1·42 <0·001 1·20 1·07, 1·34 0·002
Plasma Fe (μmol/l) 0·81 0·74, 0·89 <0·001 0·87 0·78, 0·96 0·005
Dietary energy (MJ/d) 0·86 0·79, 0·94 0·001 0·86 0·77, 0·96 0·007
Model (c): died n 472, alive n 241 Model (d): died n 403, alive n 226
Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·82 0·74, 0·92 0·001 0·83 0·73, 0·94 0·004
Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·88 0·79, 0·98 0·017 0·86 0·76, 0·97 0·017
Plasma Cu (μmol/l) 1·08 0·94, 1·22 0·3 1·02 0·88, 1·18 0·8
Plasma Fe (μmol/l) 0·87 0·78, 0·96 0·005 0·94 0·84, 1·05 0·3
Dietary energy (MJ/d) 0·87 0·77, 0·98 0·027 0·87 0·77, 0·98 0·03
*

As explained in the legend to Table 1, these were the study maximum values for n (i.e. those for the dietary variables); the values for the biochemical indices were lower, see Table 1. These models, for all-cause mortality, follow on from the left-hand data column in Table 2. For the calculations in part (a), each single (nutrient) variable was entered into the Cox proportional hazards model, together with age and sex (as in Tables 2 and 3). For those in part (b), all of the significant (P<0·05) vitamin or mineral predictor variables from Table 3, plus age and sex, were initially included together in the model; then those which fell below the assigned P<0·05 significance cut-off were successively removed, yielding just the significantly predictive nutrient variables in this multivariate model. For the calculations for the models in part (c), the significantly predictive vitamin or mineral indices or intakes from model (b) were further adjusted by the inclusion of a1-antichymotrypsin (an acute-phase indicator), plasma creatinine (a renal status indicator), plasma total and HDL-cholesterol concentrations and plasma albumin concentration. For the calculations in model (d), BMI, systolic blood pressure, current smoking index, number of prescribed drugs being taken, self-reported health score, physical activity score and receipt (or not) of certain state benefits (as an index of poverty) were further added to the variables in model (c).

Table 5.

Multivariate hazard ratios for nutritional indices and intakes for vascular mortality*

(Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals)

Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P
Model (a): died n 189, alive n 337
Model (b): died n 129, alive n 242
Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·73 0·61, 0·87 0·001 0·77 0·64, 0·94 0·01
Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·73 0·61, 0·88 0·001 0·77 0·63, 0·93 0·008
Plasma Cu (μmol/l) 1·35 1·12, 1·63 0·002 1·33 1·10, 1·60 0·002
Dietary energy (MJ/d) 0·83 0·70, 1·00 0·05 0·79 0·64, 0·98 0·03
Model (c): died n 125, alive n 241 Model (d): died n 105, alive n 226
Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·81 0·66, 0·99 0·04 0·84 0·67, 1·06 0·14
Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·81 0·66, 1·00 0·05 0·83 0·65, 1·07 0·15
Plasma Cu (μmol/l) 1·19 0·96, 1·47 0·12 1·02 0·80, 1·30 0·9
Dietary energy (MJ/d) 0·75 0·60, 0·94 0·014 0·83 0·64, 1·07 0·16
*

Please see the legend to Table 4 for an explanation of the four models, which follow on from the data, for primary vascular disease mortality, in the right-hand data column in Table 2.

Table 6.

Multivariate hazard ratios for nutritional indices and intakes for cancer mortality*

(Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals)

Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P
Model (a): died n 140, alive n 337
Model (b): died n 92, alive n 243
Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·72 0·58, 0·89 0·002 0·79 0·63, 0·99 0·04
Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·69 0·55, 0·86 0·001 0·70 0·56, 0·88 0·002
Dietary vitamin E (mg/d) 0·13 0·04, 0·42 0·001 0·23 0·06, 0·84 0·026
Model (c): died n 90, alive n 242 Model (d): died n 87, alive n 227
Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·76 0·60, 0·96 0·024 0·78 0·60, 1·01 0·06
Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·74 0·58, 0·95 0·019 0·74 0·57, 0·96 0·03
Dietary vitamin E (mg/d) 0·16 0·04, 0·65 0·011 0·19 0·04, 0·81 0·025
*

If haem Fe is added to these models of cancer mortality, it is a significant predictor, higher values being associated with greater cancer mortality, as follows: Model 1, 1·18 (1·03, 1·35) (0·014); Model 2, 1·15 (0·99, 1·34) (0·06); Model 3: 1·27 (1·08, 1·49) (0·003); Model 4: 1·26 (1·06, 1·50) (0·008). Please see the legend to Table 4 for an explanation of the four models, which follow on from the data, for primary cancer mortality, in the left-hand data column in Table 3.

Table 7.

Multivariate hazard ratios for nutritional indices and intakes for respiratory disease mortality*

(Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals)

Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P
Model (a): died n 482, alive n 242
Model (b): died n 129, alive n 242
Plasma α-tocopherol (μmol/l) 0·76 0·60, 0·96 0·02 0·77 0·60, 0·98 0·03
Carotenoids intake (mg/d) 0·74 0·59, 0·96 0·01 0·72 0·56, 0·91 0·008
Model (c): died n 407, alive n 227 Model (d): died n 123, alive n 259
Plasma α-tocopherol (μmol/l) 0·80 0·63, 1·01 0·06 0·87 0·67, 1·14 0·3
Carotenoids intake (mg/d) 0·77 0·57, 1·04 0·09 0·86 0·62, 1·19 0·4
*

Please see the legend to Table 4 for an explanation of the four models, which follow on from the data, for primary respiratory disease mortality, in the righthand data column in Table 3.

Table 3.

Age- and sex-adjusted risk for the biochemical and nutritional indices for primary cancer and primary respiratory disease mortality*

(Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals)

Cancer mortality: died n 140, alive n 337
Respiratory disease mortality: died n 112, alive n 337*
Age- and sex-adjusted
hazard ratios
95% CI P Age- and sex-adjusted
hazard ratios
95% CI P
Biochemical indices (per SD)
 Plasma vitamin C (μmol/l) 0·81 0·66, 0·99 0·035 0·78 0·63, 0·96 0·02
 Plasma vitamin A (μmol/l) 0·90 0·73, 1·12 0·4 0·88 0·70, 1·11 0·3
 Plasma α-tocopherol (μmol/l) 0·96 0·87, 1·06 0·4 0·76 0·60, 0·96 0·02
 Plasma γ-tocopherol (μmol/l) 0·89 0·71, 1·13 0·3 0·84 0·65, 1·08 0·2
 Plasma α-carotene (nmol/l) 0·67 0·47, 0·96 0·03 0·94 0·75, 1·18 0·6
 Plasma β-carotene (nmol/l) 0·87 0·69, 1·10 0·25 0·84 0·67, 1·05 0·13
 Plasma β-cryptoxanthin (nmol/l) 0·86 0·66, 1·13 0·3 0·80 0·58, 1·09 0·16
 Plasma luteinþzeaxanthin (nmol/l) 1·06 0·87, 1·30 0·5 0·77 0·60, 0·99 0·04
 Plasma lycopene (nmol/l) 1·06 0·87, 1·30 0·5 0·77 0·59, 1·00 0·05
 Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·72 0·58, 0·89 0·002 0·65 0·51, 0·82 <0·001
 Blood glutathione peroxidase
  (nmol NADPH/mg Hb per min)
1·00 0·81, 1·23 1·0 0·83 0·65, 1·05 0·12
 Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·69 0·55, 0·86 0·001 0·79 0·62, 0·99 0·04
 Plasma Cu (μmol/l) 1·18 0·92, 1·49 0·2 1·12 0·89, 1·41 0·3
 Plasma Fe (μmol/l) 0·73 0·59, 0·89 0·002 0·83 0·66, 1·04 0·11
 Plasma Fe % saturation (%) 0·72 0·58, 0·89 0·002 0·93 0·74, 1·16 0·5
 Plasma α1-antichymotrypsin (g/l) 1·08 0·91, 1·27 0·4 1·15 0·98, 1·36 0·09
Daily dietary intakes (per SD)
 Energy (kJ) 0·82 0·67, 1·01 0·06 0·85 0·66, 1·08 0·2
 Vitamin C (mg) 0·73 0·57, 0·94 0·015 0·81 0·62, 1·05 0·11
 Vitamin A (mg) 1·03 0·88, 1·019 0·7 0·87 0·70, 1·09 0·2
 Vitamin E (mg) 0·13 0·04, 0·42 0·001 0·32 0·10, 1·08 0·07
 Total carotenoids (mg) 0·92 0·77, 1·10 0·3 0·74 0·59, 0·93 0·01
 Zn (mg) 0·86 0·71, 1·04 0·11 0·88 0·70, 1·09 0·2
 Cu (mg) 0·87 0·71, 1·04 0·2 0·96 0·78, 1·18 0·7
 Non-haem Fe (mg) 1·05 0·93, 1·18 0·4 0·97 0·79, 1·27 1·0
 Haem Fe (mg) 1·18 1·03, 1·35 0·014 0·96 0·80, 1·15 0·7
*

As explained in the legend to Table 1, these were the study maximum values for n; the actual values for each index were the same as shown in Table 1.

Discussion

Because the predictive value of conventional risk factors for disease and mortality appears to diminish with advancing age(19), recent attention has focused on the discriminative ability of novel risk markers in elderly cohorts(20). The purpose of the present paper is to explore the predictive significance of a subset of the biochemical status indices and nutrient intakes that were measured at baseline as part of the original population surveillance protocol of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of People Aged 65 Years and Over, with a specific focus on those nutrients that are known to modulate redox status in living tissues.

Important strengths of the present study are that, as far as possible, the population sample was chosen as being statistically representative of the community-living people of mainland Britain in 1994–5. A wide range of nutrition-related factors was measured at baseline, including questionnaire-derived socio-demographic information, a 4 d weighed diet estimate, anthropometric measurements, haematology, blood and urine biochemistry (including a large number of nutritional indices), dental assessment, etc., and the follow-up period for mortality outcomes was substantial, i.e. 13–14 years. One inevitable weakness, invariably associated with any cross-sectional national survey, was the fact that the baseline measures were sampled at a single time-point only. It was thus, in principle, unable to address the issues of long-term causal pathways, or of intervening events occurring after the baseline measures. Another weakness was that cost considerations and database limitations precluded the inclusion of some potentially desirable indices: for instance, Se intakes could not be calculated at baseline because British food Se contents were not sufficiently well established. Nevertheless, the National Diet and Nutrition Survey series has probably included more relevant biochemical and nutrient intake indices than most population surveys except the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) of North America.

In the present study, both the status indices and the nutrient intakes which significantly predicted early mortality appeared to be driven by basic dietary nutrient concentrations rather than by dietary supplements. Our conclusions from Tables 25, that plasma concentrations of vitamin C, certain carotenoids and Se can be significant predictors of subsequent all-cause or cardiovascular or cancer mortality in older adults, are in agreement with several other studies in Western countries during the past two decades(214,2124). Both plasma vitamin C and Se also predicted mortality from primary vascular, cancer and respiratory mortality; however, the predictive power of individual plasma carotenoids was more variable, between these subcategories of mortality risk. Se prediction (but not that of vitamin C) persisted into six of the eight multivariate models as shown in Tables 4 and 5, thus appearing to be, perhaps surprisingly, robust. (The fact that blood glutathione peroxidase, another putative index of Se status, failed to predict mortality in any of the models tested may be due to the fact that this enzyme only reflects Se status in situations of relative Se deficiency(25), and indeed, the correlation between plasma Se and blood glutathione peroxidase was comparatively weak in the population studied(26).) Recent research on Se in human nutrition has suggested a wide range of possible interactions with disease processes, including some important protective effects(16,27). A study based on the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the USA(28) found a non-linear association between serum Se concentration and all-cause or cancer mortality. The range of plasma Se concentrations found in the British National Diet and Nutrition Survey was generally lower than that of the US study, and included only very few (approximately 1 %) that fell into the region of high Se concentrations that predicted shorter survival in the US study; therefore our conclusion that higher baseline Se concentrations are predictive of longer survival in Britain is entirely consistent with the observations of the US study.

Plasma α-tocopherol, which was not a significant predictor for all-cause mortality, became significant for respiratory mortality as shown in Tables 3 and 5, and somewhat surprisingly, vitamin E intake became significant (only) for cancer mortality as shown in these same two tables; carotenoid intake becoming significant (only) for respiratory disease mortality as shown in these two tables. The observation that plasma vitamin E differed fundamentally from the estimated vitamin E intake in its mortality prediction capacity seems unsurprising in view of the relative weakness of the inter-index correlation between these two indices (only approximately 1·6 % of the variance of plasma α-tocopherol was explained by the variation in vitamin E intake, based on Pearson’s correlation). All of the vitamins studied plus Se (with regard to its role at the active catalytic centre of the glutathione peroxidase enzymes) are considered to be primarily antioxidant (and hence protective) in vivo, although several of them can also exhibit pro-oxidant (i.e. possibly deleterious) properties(2932). Dietary supplements of some carotenoids, in particular, have been associated with an increased risk of some degenerative diseases(33,34), and a recent meta-analysis(35) has found consistent evidence for deleterious effects, on all-cause mortality, for dietary supplements containing vitamins A, E and/or β-carotene.

Less well studied, however, is the relationship of the mineral nutrient indices plasma Zn and Fe, as potential predictors of future mortality. Tables 25 suggest that, in the present study, these were all comparatively robust predictors, not only of all-cause-mortality but also of two of the three subcategories of primary mortality from vascular diseases and cancer, while plasma Zn also predicted mortality from primary respiratory disease. Whereas Zn is generally considered to be ‘antioxidant’ and therefore protective in vivo (36,37), which may, in turn, be linked to its well-established immunoprotective functions(17,38), in redox-modulatory terms, the opposite is true for Fe, which often exerts pro-oxidant potential. However, Fe is, of course, an essential nutrient, and Fe deficiency is one of the commonest recognised mineral deficiency disease in human populations. Since in the present study, both Zn and Fe were associated with reduced mortality risk, it appears unlikely that their redox-modulatory properties are dominant here. Deficiency effects (on mortality) seem likewise unlikely, although possible. More probable, however, is their relationship with debility and risk of mortality through their relationship with chronic inflammation and the acute-phase reaction. Both plasma Zn and plasma Fe (or the Fe % saturation of Fe-binding transferrin) are negative acute-phase reactants and were associated with reduced mortality risk here. Plasma Cu, like plasma α1-antichymotrypsin, is a positive acute-phase reactant, and both of these indices were associated with increased risk of all-cause and primary vascular disease mortality (Table 2). Neither index, however, significantly predicted primary cancer or respiratory disease mortality (Table 3), suggesting that these two status indices may tend to change in parallel with each other. In this context, vascular disease is usually considered to be a long-term chronic condition, possibly characterised by an inflammatory state at baseline, whereas death from respiratory disease may more often arise from acute infections near the end of life (e.g. bronchitis, pleurisy, etc.), which might be one of the reasons why plasma α1-antichymotrypsin and Cu were significant predictors of vascular disease mortality but not of respiratory disease (or cancer) mortality here. As observed from Table 4, when α1-antichymotrypsin was introduced as part of a suite of adjuster indices (i.e. Table 4 part (b) v. part (a)), plasma Cu lost its significance for the prediction for all-cause and vascular disease mortality; however, this was not necessarily true for plasma Zn or Se (Tables 4 and 5).

The pattern of significant nutrient intake predictors in the present study seems, in some respects, to be predictable, but in others it is somewhat surprising. The fact that (increased) energy intake predicted (reduced) mortality in three of the models as shown in Tables 2 and 4 may simply reflect the fact that a robust appetite reflects relatively sound health at baseline. Prediction by intakes of vitamins C and E and carotenoids as shown in Tables 2, 3 and 5 may reflect ‘healthy lifestyles’, including ‘healthy’ food choices, and factors such as healthy dental status and ability to chew fruit and other rich sources of these and related nutrients, including vitamin E and certain minerals(39). The observed relationship between higher haem Fe intakes and higher risk of mortality attributed to cancer (in Table 3) seems consistent with the prevalent view that certain categories of meat intake may represent a risk factor for incidence of some cancers, especially bowel cancer.

The fact that only dietary energy survived as a significant predictor in the fully adjusted models as shown in Tables 4 and 5 may reflect the fact that many nutrient intakes are strongly correlated with energy intakes; however, the survival of dietary vitamin E (cancer mortality) and carotenoids (respiratory disease) in the absence of significance for dietary energy may imply a special significance for these nutrients in these diseases, and thus deserves future investigation. It is well known that variable misreporting of dietary intakes is a major unresolved problem for the interpretation of all surveys that include the estimation of nutrient intakes. Our survey sought to minimise this problem by the use of robust 4 d diet estimates based on weighed food intakes; furthermore, any measurement error present would result in attenuation of the observed relationships rather than the strengthening of relationships. However, we acknowledge that some uncertainty remains in this respect. In the present study, energy intake was found to be a significant predictor of mortality when standardised values were used, but it failed to reach conventional significance when its values were not standardised. In contrast, the key biochemical (status) indices all remained significant predictors of mortality, whether or not they were standardised.

From Tables 47, it is clear that whereas the prediction significance of some of the nutritional indices was progressively attenuated after additional variables were included in the multivariate models, in other instances there was a little change, or even an increase in significance. Such variations may help to assess the relative robustness of mortality prediction, by the different (e.g. nutrient) variables, and for the different mortality categories.

In conclusion, a number of baseline nutrient status indices with ‘redox-modulatory’ connotations appear to predict all-cause, primary vascular disease, cancer or respiratory disease mortality in older British adults. Of these, plasma Se, Zn and Fe appeared to be especially robust, with plasma vitamins C, E and carotenoids being predictive in some, but not all, of the models examined. Some of the status indices (especially plasma Cu) appeared to reflect acute-phase status; others (including dietary intakes of certain nutrients) may have reflected the robustness of appetites and dentition, and ‘healthiness’ of lifestyles (see Khaw et al.(40)). Future studies should attempt to determine, first, which nutrients are the most frequent predictors of all-cause and specific-cause mortality in different populations, and second, whether these predictions can imply causal relationships, such that dietary or other interventions might promote disease-free longevity.

Acknowledgements

The survey was commissioned jointly by the Department of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, whose survey responsibility has since been transferred to the Food Standards Agency. It was carried out by the National Centre for Social Research, formerly Social and Community Planning Research in conjunction with the Micronutrient Status Laboratory of the MRC Dunn Nutrition Unit, now part of MRC Human Nutrition Research. The survey datasets were obtained from the survey commissioners, the University of Essex Data Archive and the Social Survey Division of the Office for National Statistics. We are indebted to Dr H. Trevor Delves and staff of the Trace Element Unit of the University of Southampton for the Se analyses and to Claire Deverill and Marie Sanchez (National Centre for Social Research) for their assistance in obtaining the mortality data. All the three authors were active in the data analysis, its interpretation and in preparing the manuscript, and in addition, G. D. M. advised on, and interpreted, the statistical analyses. There were no conflicts of interest. Funding was provided by the Medical Research Council. C. J. B. coordinated the dataset, drafted and submitted the manuscript and contributed to the data analysis; M. H. and G. D. M. contributed to the data analysis and helped to revise the manuscript.

Abbreviation

ICD

International Classification of Diseases

References

  • 1.Finch S, Doyle W, Lowe C, et al. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: People Aged 65 Years or Over. vol. 1: Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. The Stationery Office; London: 1998. http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/doc/4036%5Cmrdoc%5Cpdf%5Ca4036ueb.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Enstrom JE, Kanim LE, Klein MA. Vitamin C intake and mortality among a sample of the United States population. Epidemiology. 1992;3:194–202. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199205000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pandey DK, Shekelle R, Selwyn BJ. Dietary vitamin C and beta-carotene and risk of death in middle-aged men. The Western Electric Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:1269–1278. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sahyoun NR, Jacques PF, Russell RM. Carotenoids, vitamin C and E, and mortality in an elderly population. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:501–511. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kromhout D, Bloemberg B, Feskens E, et al. Saturated fat, vitamin C and smoking predict long-term population all-cause mortality rates in the Seven Countries Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:260–265. doi: 10.1093/ije/29.2.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Loria CM, Klag MJ, Caulfield LE, et al. Vitamin C status and mortality in US adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:139–145. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.1.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khaw K-T, Bingham S, Welch A, et al. Relation between plasma ascorbic acid and mortality in men and women in EPIC-Norfolk prospective study: a prospective population study. Lancet. 2001;357:657–663. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04128-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Simon JA, Hudes ES, Tice JA. Relation of serum ascorbic acid to mortality among US adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;20:255–263. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2001.10719040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fletcher AE, Breeze E, Shetty PS. Antioxidant vitamins and mortality in older persons: findings from the nutrition add-on study to the Medical Research Council Trial of Assessment and Management of Older people in the Community. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:999–1010. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.5.999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jia X, Aucott LS, McNeill G. Nutritional status and subsequent all-cause mortality in men and women aged 75 years or over living in the community. Br J Nutr. 2007;98:593–599. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507725163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buijsse B, Feskens EJM, Schlettwein-Gsell D, et al. Plasma carotene and alpha-tocopherol in relation to 10-y all-cause and cause-specific mortality in European elderly: the Survey in Europe on Nutrition and the Elderly, a Concerted Action (SENECA) Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:879–886. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/82.4.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ray AL, Semba RD, Walston J, et al. Low serum selenium and total carotenoids predict mortality among older women living in the community: the Women’s Health and Aging Studies. J Nutr. 2006;136:172–176. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.1.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Akrabaraly NT, Arnaud J, Hininger-Favier I, et al. Selenium and mortality in the elderly: results from the EVA study. Clin Chem. 2005;51:2117–2123. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.055301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gonzalez S, Huerta JM, Fernandez S, et al. Homocysteine increases the risk of mortality in elderly individuals. Br J Nutr. 2007;97:1138–1143. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507691958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kistorp C, Raymond I, Pedersen F, et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and urinary albumin levels as predictors of mortality and cardiovascular events in older adults. JAMA. 2005;293:1609–1616. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.13.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rayman MP. The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet. 2000;356:33–241. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02490-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prasad AS. Zinc: mechanisms of host defense. J Nutr. 2007;37:1345–1349. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.5.1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Webb AL, Villamor E. Update: effects of antioxidant and non-antioxidant vitamin supplementation on immune function. Nutr Rev. 2007;65:181–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kannel WB. Coronary heart disease risk factors in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2002;11:101–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1076-7460.2002.00995.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.de Ruijter W, Westendorp RGJ, Assendelft WJJ, et al. Use of Framingham risk score and new biomarkers to predict cardiovascular mortality in older people: population based observational cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:a3083. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buijsse B, Feskens EJM, Kwape L, et al. Both alpha- and beta-carotene but not tocopherols and vitamin C, are inversely related to 15-year cardiovascular mortality in Dutch elderly men. J Nutr. 2008;138:344–350. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.2.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kok FJ, de Bruijn AM, Vermeeren R, et al. Serum selenium, vitamin antioxidants, and cardiovascular mortality: a 9-year follow-up study an The Netherlands. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987;45:462–468. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/45.2.462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wei W-Q, Abnet CC, Qiao Y-L, et al. Prospective study of serum selenium concentrations and esophageal and gastric cardia cancer, heart disease, stroke, and total death. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:80–85. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.1.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gale CR, Martyn CN, Winter PD, et al. Vitamin C and risk of death from stroke and coronary heart disease in a cohort of elderly people. BMJ. 1995;310:1563–1566. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thomson C, Robinson M. The changing selenium status of New Zealand residents. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50:107–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bates CJ, Thane CW, Prentice A, et al. Selenium status and its correlates in a British National Diet and Nutrition Survey: people aged 65 years and over. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2002;16:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0946-672x(02)80002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rayman MP. Food chain selenium and human health: emphasis on intake. Br J Nutr. 2008;100:238–253. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508939830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bleys J, Navas-Acien A, Guallar E. Serum selenium levels and all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:404–410. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Podmore ID, Griffiths HR, Herbert KE, et al. Vitamin C exhibits pro-oxidant properties. Lancet. 1998;392:559. doi: 10.1038/33308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Halliwell B. Commentary. Oxidative stress, nutrition and health. Experimental strategies for optimization of nutritional antioxidant intake in humans. Free Radic Res. 1996;25:57–74. doi: 10.3109/10715769609145656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ricciarelli R, Zingg J-M, Azzi A. Vitamin E: protective role of a Janus molecule. FASEB J. 2001;15:2314–2325. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0258rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cooke MS, Evans MD, Mistry N, et al. Role of dietary antioxidants in the prevention of in vivo oxidative DNA damage. Nutr Res Rev. 2002;15:19–41. doi: 10.1079/NRR200132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Daly S, Mills J, Molloy AM, et al. Minimum effective dose of folic acid for food fortification to prevent neural-tube defects. Lancet. 1997;350:1666–1669. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07247-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK, et al. Use of antioxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:2017–2023. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13637-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bjelakovik G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, et al. Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention. JAMA. 2008;297:842–857. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.8.842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bray TM, Bettger WJ. The physiological role of zinc as antioxidant. Free Radic Biol Med. 1990;8:281–291. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(90)90076-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.DiSilvestro RA. Zinc in relation to diabetes and oxidative stress. J Nutr. 2000;130(Suppl. 5S):1509S–1511S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.5.1509S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Walker CF, Black RE. Zinc and the risk for infectious disease. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:255–275. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.23.011702.073054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Steele JG, Sheiham A, Marcenes W, et al. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: People Aged 65 Years and Over. vol. 2: Report of the Oral Health Survey. The Stationery Office; London: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Khaw K-T, Wareham N, Bingham S, et al. Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study. PLOS Med. 2008;5:39–46. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES