Abstract
Although the fate of most tRNA molecules in the cell is aminoacylation and delivery to the ribosome, some tRNAs are destined to fulfill other functional roles. In addition to their central role in translation, tRNA molecules participate in processes such as regulation of gene expression, bacterial cell wall biosynthesis, viral replication, antibiotic biosynthesis, and suppression of alternative splicing. In bacteria, glycyl-tRNA molecules with anticodon sequences GCC and UCC exhibit multiple extra-translational functions including transcriptional regulation and cell wall biosynthesis. We have determined the high-resolution structures of three glycyl-tRNA anticodon arms with anticodon sequences GCC and UCC. Two of the tRNA molecules are proteinogenic (tRNAGly,GCC and tRNAGly,UCC) and the third is non-proteinogenic (np-tRNAGly,UCC) and participates in cell wall biosynthesis. The UV-monitored thermal melting curves show that the anticodon arm of tRNAGly,UCC with a loop-closing C-A+ base pair melts at a 10 °C lower temperature than those of tRNAGly,GCC or np-tRNAGly,UCC. U-A and C-G pairs close the loops of the later two molecules and enhance stem stability. Mg2+ stabilizes the tRNAGly,UCC anticodon arm and lessens the Tm differential. The structures of the three tRNAGly anticodon arms exhibit small differences between one another, but none of them form the classical U-turn motif. The anticodon loop of tRNAGly,GCC becomes more dynamic and disordered in the presence of multivalent cations, whereas metal ion coordination in the anticodon loops of tRNAGly,UCC and np-tRNAGly,UCC establishes conformational homogeneity. The conformational similarity of the molecules is greater than their functional differences might suggest. Because aminoacylation of the full-length tRNA molecules is accomplished by one tRNA synthetase, the similar structural context of the loop may facilitate efficient recognition of each of the anticodon sequences.
Keywords: Heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy, U-turn motif, Staphylococcus aureus, T box riboswitch, peptidoglycan synthesis
Introduction
The functional importance of tRNA extends beyond its core cellular role in translation and relies both on its capacity to deliver amino acids and on its structure. One of these extra-translational roles involves the T box mechanism of transcription attenuation in Gram positive bacteria. In this regulatory mechanism, tRNA molecules directly mediate the expression of several genes whose products are involved in amino acid metabolism in order to maintain a balanced pool of aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) 1, 2. tRNA molecules also play a key role in the synthesis of the peptidoglycan cell wall in bacteria 3, 4. The short peptides that cross link the glycan moieties of the cell wall matrix are synthesized in a non-ribosome catalyzed peptidyltransferase reaction that uses aa-tRNA molecules as substrates. tRNA molecules function to prime the reverse transcription reaction of retroviruses and retrovirus-like elements. The primer initiation role of tRNALys,3 is vital for replication of the RNA genome of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) 5, 6 and tRNAPro serves a similar function in murine leukemia virus (MuLV) replication 7. Interestingly, the primer binding sites (PBS) of members of the murine retrovirus-like VL30 family also contain segments complementary to the 3′ end of tRNAGly that can functionally replace the native prolyl PBS and sustain tRNAGly-dependent MuLV growth 7, 8. Other tRNA-dependent mechanisms in the cell include phospholipid modification of bacterial membranes in response to environmental changes 9, 10, antibiotic synthesis in species of Streptomyces 11, 12, and the suppression of alternative splicing of pre-mRNA in the nucleus by tRNAiMet variants 13, 14.
Glycyl-tRNA (tRNAGly) is one of the tRNA families with multiple extra-translational roles. In many Gram positive bacteria, expression of the gene encoding glycyl-tRNA synthetase is regulated by the T box riboswitch mechanism and tRNAGly with anticodon GCC (tRNAGly,GCC) serves as a sensor molecule 15 (Figure 1A). This transcription attenuation mechanism is sensitive to the ratio of charged tRNA to uncharged tRNA in the cell. The 5′ untranslated region of the mRNA sequence-specifically binds tRNA molecules and forms one of two alternative hairpin secondary structures, the terminator hairpin and the antiterminator hairpin, depending upon the charge state of the bound tRNA. T box riboswitch selection of the appropriate tRNA molecule for regulation of the downstream gene occurs through pairing of the Specifier codon nucleotides with the nucleotides of the tRNA anticodon. Additional base pairing involving the universally conserved U33 of tRNA also has been proposed 16. In many bacteria including Bacilli and Staphylococcus species, the glycyl T box riboswitch is specified by the codon 5′-GGC-3′ which is complementary to the tRNAGly isoacceptor tRNAGly,GCC, but the Specifier codon 5′-GGA-3′ also is represented and would be predicted to be bind the isoacceptor tRNAGly,UCC 17 (Figure 1B). Binding of the non-cognate glycyl-tRNA isoacceptor tRNAGly,UCC to the 5′-GGC-3′ Specifier sequence cannot be excluded and may contribute to regulation of the glyQS operon.
Figure 1.
Sequences corresponding to the anticodon arms of S. aureus (A) tRNAGly,GCC, (B) tRNAGly,UCC, and (C) np-tRNAGly,UCC. Nucleotide numbering corresponds to the full-length tRNA molecule. Residues 27–30 and 40–43 were changed to permit transcription using T7 RNA polymerase and to facilitate comparison of structural and thermodynamic effects of the loop sequences. Also shown are the chemical structures of modifications cmnm5-U, 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl uridine, cmo5-U, 5-oxyacetic acid uridine, and m6A, (N6-methylallyl)-adenine.
Peptidoglycan cell wall biosynthesis in bacteria involves a non-ribosomal peptidyltransferase mechanism that utilizes aminoacylated tRNA molecules as substrates for the peptide polymerization reaction. The peptidyltransferase enzymes FemABX catalyze the formation of short homopolymers that cross-link the glycan moieties and increase rigidity of the cell wall 18, 19. A glycyl-tRNA, first identified and sequenced in Staphylococcus species, participates in cell wall synthesis but is not involved in ribosome-catalyzed protein synthesis and is designated a non-proteinogenic glycyl-tRNA (np-tRNAGly) 3, 4, 20. These np-tRNAGly molecules bear the anticodon sequence 5′-UCC-3′ and are charged by glycyl-tRNA synthetase. The np-tRNAGly has a cytidine at position 37 (Figure 1C) rather than the purine found in proteinogenic glycyl-tRNA molecules and the U34 base is not modified as it is in the proteinogenic tRNAGly,UCC of many bacteria 21 (Figure 1). The Staphylococcal np-tRNAGly molecules contain A49-U65 and A51-U63 base pairs at the base of the T-arm rather than the G49-U65 and G51-C63 base pairs found in most proteinogenic tRNA molecules. In Thermus thermophilus, substitution of the A51-U63 base pair for G51-C63 results in the loss of a direct contact between E390 of EF-Tu and the amino group of G51, that substantially weakens affinity for elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) 22–24. This weakened affinity for EF-Tu limits participation of np-tRNAGly in ribosomal protein synthesis and presumably ensures a stable pool of proteinogenic tRNAGly for translation during cell wall biosynthesis 20, 24.
Glycine is a member of a four-codon box family, a set of four codons that designate the same amino acid and whose first two nucleotides are the same. In bacteria, these boxes are read by up to three different tRNA isoacceptors. Species of Bacillus and Staphylococcus use two tRNAGly isoacceptors, with the anticodon sequences 5′-U*CC-3′ and 5′-GCC-3′ where U* is a modified uridine (Figure 1). Modifications on U34 can lead to opposite functional effects, enhancement of the ability of U to wobble or restriction of wobbling and enhancement of discrimination 25. In the case of lysine, which occupies a mixed-codon box, U34 is modified to 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine (mnm5s2U, Figure 1) and pairing is restricted to A and G. The U34 modification uridine 5-oxoacetic acid (cmo5U, Figure 1) allows a single tRNA isoacceptor to decode at least three valine codons in bacteria 21, 26. However, modification of U34 is not always needed for enhanced wobbling. In Mycoplasma mycoides and in mitochondria and chloroplast, one tRNA isoacceptor with anticodon sequence 5′-UCC-3′ reads all four glycine codons with equal efficiency 27–29. Notably, 5′-GGA-3′ and 5′-GGU-3′ combined represent ~95% of glycine codons used in M. mycoides whereas these codons are used ~75% of the time in S. aureus or B. subtilis.
tRNA molecules interact with a variety of proteins and other RNA molecules in the cell to fulfill a multitude of functional roles. To examine possible contributions of structural diversity for glycine anticodon stem-loop sequences, the anticodon arms of tRNAs from S. aureus that participate in three cellular functions, (translation, regulation, and cell wall assembly) were selected (Figure 1). The tRNAGly,GCC participates in transcriptional regulation and translation but contains no base modifications. The tRNAGly,UCC participates in translation and in many organisms contains a U34 base modification, but in some organisms, such as M. mycoides, is not modified. The nucleotide sequences of these anticodon loops are the same in B. subtilis and M. mycoides. The np- tRNAGly,UCC participates in cell wall biosynthesis and does not contain base modifications. These selected glycyl-tRNA isoacceptors also allow examination of the possible structural influences of base type at positions 34 and 37. We have determined the structures of these anticodon arms (Figure 1). Although the participation of the np-tRNAGly,UCC in translation is likely to be restricted by low affinity for EF-Tu, the pyrimidine-37 residue of np-tRNAGly,UCC and other np-tRNAs may limit contributions of these molecules to other anticodon-dependent processes. The structures of the tRNAGly anticodon arms differ from one another, but none of them form the classical U-turn motif seen in some tRNA anticodon arms. All of these RNA molecules form stems with at least five base pairs. The anticodon loop of tRNAGly,GCC becomes more dynamic and disordered in the presence of multivalent cations, whereas the anticodon loops of tRNAGly,UCC and np-tRNAGly,UCC become more structurally ordered by these ions. Although the U-turn is integral to ribosomal codon-anticodon pairing, it is not known if this motif is required for T box regulation or cell wall biosynthesis. A more dynamic loop structure may better accommodate the different functional roles of tRNAGly.
Materials and Methods
All enzymes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, except for enzymes T7 RNA polymerase, which was prepared as described 30. Deoxyribonuclease I type II, pyruvate kinase, adenylate kinase, and nucleotide monophosphate kinase were obtained as powders, dissolved in 15% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and stored at −20 °C. Guanylate kinase and nuclease P1 were obtained as solutions and stored at −20 °C. Unlabeled 5′ nucleoside triphosphates (5′-NTPs) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, phosphoenolpyruvate (potassium salt) was purchased from Bachem, and 99% [15N]-ammonium sulfate and 99% [13C6]-glucose were purchased from Isotec.
Preparation of RNA samples
The RNA sequences for the ASLGly molecules shown in Figure 1 were synthesized in vitro using T7 RNA polymerase and a synthetic DNA template. The nucleotide sequence of the stem corresponds to residues 27–43 of full-length tRNAGly molecules. To facilitate transcription using T7 RNA polymerase, the first three base pairs of the stems were modified from the native sequences. Unlabeled RNA molecules were prepared from 10 ml transcription reactions using 4 mM 5′-NTPs. Isotopically labeled RNA molecules were prepared from 10 ml transcription reactions using 3 mM uniformly [13C-15N]-enriched 5′-NTPs as described 31. The RNA molecules were purified by passage through 20% (w/v) preparative polyacrylamide gels, electroeluted (Schleicher & Schuell), and precipitated with ethanol. The purified oligonucleotides were dissolved in 1.0 M NaCl, 20 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.2, and 2.0 mM EDTA, and dialyzed extensively against 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.2, and 0.02 mM EDTA, using a Centricon-3 concentrator (Amicon Inc.). The samples were diluted with buffer to a volume of 0.33 ml and lyophilized to a powder. For experiments involving the non-exchangeable protons, the ASLGly,GCC and ASLGly,UCC samples were exchanged twice with 99.9% D2O and then resuspended in 0.33 ml of 99.96% D2O and annealed. The ASLGly,UCC sample was mixed with Co(NH3)63+ dissolved in D2O to a final concentration of 2.0 mM Co(NH3)63+. After annealing, the np-ASLGly,UCC sample was dialyzed against low salt buffer containing 3.0 mM MgCl2 in 99.9% D2O. For experiments involving detection of the exchangeable protons, the samples were dialyzed against appropriate buffer (2.0 mM Co(NH3)63+ or 3.0 mM MgCl2) containing 90% H2O/10% D2O. The samples contained 30–100 A260 OD units of RNA oligonucleotide in 0.33 ml (≈0.4–1.5 mM).
NMR spectroscopy
Spectra were acquired on Varian Inova 500 MHz (1H-[13C, 15N, 31P] probe) and 600 MHz and 800 MHz (1H-[13C, 15N] cryoprobe) spectrometers. Solvent suppression for 1H homonuclear spectra collected in 90% H2O was achieved using the binomial scheme. The data points were extended by 25% using linear prediction for the indirectly detected dimensions. NMR spectra were processed and analyzed using Felix 2007 (Felix NMR Inc., San Diego, CA).
Two-dimensional (2D) 13C-1H HSQC spectra were collected to identify 13C-1H chemical shift correlations. Sugar spin systems were assigned using 3D HCCH-TOCSY (8 ms and 24 ms DIPSI-3 spin lock) experiments collected in D2O. 2D HCN experiments were used to identify intra-residue base-ribose correlations. Pyrimidine C2 and C4 resonances were assigned from H6-C2 and H5-C4 correlations using 2D H(CN)C and 2D CCH-COSY experiments and a 2D H(N)CO experiment for np-ASLGly,UCC uridine NH-[C2, C4] resonances 32–34. 2D 15N-1H HSQC spectra optimized for 2-bond HN couplings were collected to identify purine N7 and adenine N1 and N3 resonances. 2D 15N-1H HSQC spectra were collected to identify 15N-1H chemical shift correlations. Sequential assignments and distance constraints for the non-exchangeable resonances were derived at 25 °C from 2D 1H -1H NOESY spectra (tm = 90, 180, and 420 ms) and 3D 13C-edited NOESY spectra (tm = 180 and 400 ms). Assignments and distance constraints for the exchangeable resonances were derived at 12 °C from 2D NOESY spectra (tm = 160 and 360 ms) acquired in 90% 1H2O.
3JH-H and 3JP-H coupling constants were estimated using DQF-COSY and 31P-1H experiments, respectively. 3JC-P coupling constants also were estimated for np-ASLGly,UCC using the CECT-HCP experiment. 35
Distance and torsion angle constraints
Interproton distances were estimated from cross peak intensities in 2D NOESY and 3D 13C-edited NOESY spectra. Using the covalently fixed pyrimidine H5-H6 distance (≈2.4 Å) and the conformationally restricted sugar H1′-H2′ distance (2.8–3.0 Å) as references, peak intensities were classified as strong, medium, weak, or very weak and their corresponding proton pairs given upper bound distance constraints of 3.2, 4.2, 5.2, or 6.2 Å, respectively. Cross peaks observed only at mixing times ≥180 ms were classified as extremely weak and given 7.2 Å upper bound distance constraints to account for the possibility of spin diffusion. All distance constraints were given lower bounds of 1.8 Å. Only the intra-residue sugar-to-sugar constraints involving H5′ and H5″ resonances included in the calculations are considered conformationally restrictive. Distance constraints involving exchangeable protons were estimated from 360 ms mixing time NOESY spectra and were classified as medium, weak, very weak, or extremely weak.
Watson-Crick base pairs were identified by observation of a significantly downfield shifted NH or NH2 proton resonance and the observation of strong G-C NH–NH2 or A-U H2–NH NOEs and by the chemical shifts of non-protonated base 15N and 13C carbonyl resonances. Hydrogen bonds were introduced as distance restraints of 2.9 ± 0.3 Å between donor and acceptor heavy atoms and 2.0 ± 0.2 Å between acceptor and hydrogen atoms.
Ribose ring pucker and backbone dihedral constraints were derived from 3JHH, 3JHP, and 3JCP couplings 36. Residues with 3JH1′-H2′ < 5 Hz and C3′ resonances between 70–74 ppm were constrained to C3′-endo. Ribose rings with 3JH1′-H2′≈5 Hz and with C3′ and C4′ resonances between 74–76 and 84–86 ppm, respectively, were left unconstrained. The angle δ was constrained as 85° ± 30° and 160° ± 30° for C3′-endo and C2′-endo sugars respectively. For residues 27–33 and 37–43, γ was constrained to the gauche+ conformation (60 ± 20°) 36. γ was left unconstrained for the anticodon residues. Dihedral angle restraints for the β and ε torsion angles were derived from 3JP-H5′, 3JP-H5″, and 3JP-H3′ couplings estimated in 2D 31P-1H HetCor spectra and 3JP-C2′/P-C4′ couplings measured in 2D ctHSQC spin-echo difference spectra. For stem residues, β was constrained to the trans conformation (180 ± 20°) if 3JP-C4′ was > 5 Hz. Σ was constrained to the trans conformation (−150 ± 20°) for residues with 3JP-C2′ < 5 Hz and 3JP-C4′ > 5 Hz. α and ζ were constrained to −65 ± 20° for the stem residues 27–31 and 39–43. Because a down-field shifted 31P resonance is associated with the trans conformation of α or ζ, and because no such shift is observed for any of the 31P resonances in the RNA molecules, α and ζ were loosely constrained to exclude the trans conformation (0 ± 120°) for residues 32–38. Although all base 6/8-1′ intra-residue NOE cross peak intensities support the anti configuration about the glycosidic bond, no dihedral angle constraints were used for the angle χ.
Structure calculations and refinement
An initial set of structures was calculated using a shortened version of the simulated annealing protocol (described below). A list of all proton pairs in the calculated structures closer than 5.0 Å (representing expected NOEs) was compared to the list of constraints. The NOESY spectra were then re-examined for predicted NOEs absent from the constraint list. In some cases, this allowed the unambiguous assignment of previously unidentified NOEs, but, in other cases, the predicted NOEs were obscured due to spectral overlap.
Structure refinement was carried out with simulated annealing and restrained molecular dynamics (rMD) calculations using Xplor-NIH v2.19 37. Starting coordinates for ASLGly were generated using Insight II (Accelrys, San Diego, CA) and were based on standard A-form helical geometry. The structure calculations were performed in two stages. Beginning with the energy minimized starting coordinates, 50 structures were generated using 80 ps of rMD at 1200K with hydrogen bond, NOE-derived distance and base-pairing restraints. The system then was cooled to 25 K over 12 ps of rMD. Force constants used for the calculations were increased from 2 kcal mol−1 Å−2 to 30 kcal mol−1 Å−2 for the NOE and from 2 kcal mol−1 rad−2 to 30 kcal mol−1 rad−2 for the dihedral angle constraints. Each structure was then minimized with constraints at the end of the rMD. Eight structures were selected for the final refinement. The criteria for final structure selection included lowest energies, fewest constraint violations, and fewest predicted unobserved NOEs (1H pairs less than 3.5 Å apart, but no corresponding cross peak in the NOE spectra). A second round of rMD was performed on these structures using protocols similar to those used in the first round of structure calculation. The major difference was the starting temperature of 300 K followed by cooling to 25 K over 28 ps of rMD. Ten refined structures for each model were analyzed using Xplor-NIH and Pymol and UCSF Chimera.
Thermal stability
UV melting studies were performed using 0.5 A260 units RNA hairpin dissolved in NMR buffer (10 mM NaCl, 10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.3, and 0.05 mM EDTA). The samples were heated to 90 °C for 60 s and snap cooled on ice before each melting experiment. A260 absorbance spectra from 10–92 °C were acquired (1.0 °C per minute) on a Jasco J-815 circular dichroism spectrometer equipped with a peltier heating apparatus. The melting curves were acquired in triplicate and averaged.
RESULTS
RNA thermal stability
The thermal stability of ASLGly,GCC, ASLGly,UCC, and np-ASLGly,UCC (Figure 1) were investigated using UV melting experiments to determine overall molecular stability (Tm). The normalized UV thermal denaturation curves indicate that the ASLGly molecules melt in one step (Figure 2). We have observed two-stage melting transitions of other anticodon arms (tyrosine and phenylalanine) with the lower temperature (<50 °C) transition corresponding to the destacking of the loop nucleotides 34, 38. In these two systems, the anticodon contains an adenine nucleotide which may facilitate stacking of the unpaired loop nucleotides. Two of the glycine molecules (ASLGly,GCC and np-ASLGly,UCC) display similar Tm values around 70 °C and the Tm of ASLGly,UCC is 10 °C lower. Both ASLGly,GCC and np-ASLGly,UCC form 6–7 Watson-Crick base pair stems whereas ASLGly,UCC forms five regular base pairs and a protonated C-A+ base pair at pH 6.3 (see below). Additionally, the degree of base stacking differs among the molecules. The hyperchromicity associated with melting is least for np-ASLGly,UCC (9%) and greatest for ASLGly,GCC and ASLGly,UCC (16% and 14%, respectively). Mg2+ raises the Tm of ASLGly,UCC to the level of np-ASLGly,UCC and has only a slight (~1 °C) destabilizing effect on np-ASLGly,UCC (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
The UV melting curves of ASLGly,GCC (red), np-ASLGly,UCC (blue), and np-ASLGly,UCC (green). The ASLGly molecules exhibit a single melting transition that occurs above 55 °C—suggesting minimal stacking of the unpaired loop nucleotide bases. The melting transitions generally agree with the predicted secondary structures of the molecules with ASLGly,UCC displaying the lowest melting transition and having the fewest Watson-Crick base pairs. The addition of Mg2+ to ASLGly,UCC (light blue) raises the Tm by ~10 °C but causes an ~1.5 °C decrease when added to np-ASLGly,UCC (light green). In the absence of Mg2+, the apparent Tm’s of ASLGly,GCC, ASLGly,UCC, and np-ASLGly,UCC are 72.0 °C, 60.4 °C, and 73.1 °C, respectively.
Resonance assignments of the ASLGly molecules
Due to self-complementarity, the RNA sequences used in this study can adopt either hairpin (monomer) form or a duplex form with internal loops of different sizes. Therefore, the oligomeric states of the RNA molecules were assessed using the NH spectra of each of the molecules. The hairpin forms have moderate line widths (9–14 Hz 1H) and NH peak patterns that are independent of RNA concentration. ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC yield a single set of NH resonances consistent with the hairpin helix and give rise to single bands on native PAGE gels. The NH spectrum of ASLGly,GCC also yields a single set of peaks immediately after annealing. However, additional peaks appear in the spectrum after several hours. The hairpin-duplex equilibrium was confirmed using a NOE-based 15N-filtered spectrum 39. At low RNA concentration (<0.4 mM) and <5 mM NaCl, the duplex constitutes <5% of the RNA population. Native PAGE analysis also shows that ASLGly,GCC forms a mixture of monomer and dimer species.
Under conditions of low salt and RNA concentration <0.4 mM, ASLGly,GCC yields good quality spectra with no evidence of duplex. However, the base 1H and 13C resonances of ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC exhibit limited dispersion with a few resonances broadened by chemical exchange (Figure 3). To improve spectral quality, Mg2+ and Co(NH3)63+ were tested for their ability to bind the RNA molecules and promote conformational homogeneity. For np-ASLGly,UCC, 3.0 mM Mg2+ yields quality spectra with improved resolution. For ASLGly,UCC, 2.0 mM Co(NH3)63+ was found to improve spectral dispersion and reduce exchange broadening whereas Mg2+ was less effective and resulted in general resonance broadening. Therefore, the solution NMR studies for ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC were performed in the presence of Co(NH3)63+ and Mg2+, respectively.
Figure 3.
Comparison of two-dimensional 13C-1H HSQC spectra of the base C6/8 regions of ASLGly,UCC in the (A) absence and (B) presence of Co(NH3)63+ and of np-ASLGly,UCC in the (C) absence and (D) presence of Mg2+. Addition of Co(NH3)63+ leads to substantial sharpening and upfield movement of the A38 crosspeak of ASLGly,UCC. The effect of Co(NH3)63+ addition on the protonation state of ASLGly,UCC A38 is shown in the inset (B). The adenine C2 resonances in the absence (gray) and presence (black) of Co(NH3)63+.
The non-exchangeable 1H and 13C resonances of the three ASLGly molecules (Figure 1) were assigned using standard heteronuclear techniques 40, 41. Most of the base and ribose 1H and 13C correlations are resolved for each of the molecules (Figure 3). In the absence of metal ion, the A38 C2 resonance of ASLGly,UCC is slightly broadened and has a chemical shift of 148.6 ppm indicative of N1 protonation (Figure 3). With the addition of Co(NH3)63+, the A38 base deprotonates and the C2 resonance shifts downfield to 153.2 ppm. The ribose spin systems, except for the incompletely labeled 5′-terminal nucleotides, were identified using 2D or 3D HCCH-COSY and HCCH-TOCSY experiments. For ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC, spectral overlap even in the 3D spectrum limited unambiguous assignment of some 4′ and 5′ resonances. Intra-residue base-to-sugar correlations were identified using 2D H(C)N experiments to obtain correlations H6-N1, H8-N9, and H1′-N1/N9. All pyrimidine correlations and all purine (ASLGly,GCC and np-ASLGly,UCC) or four of six purine (ASLGly,UCC) correlations were identified in these spectra. The G28 and A38 correlations of ASLGly,UCC are not observed due to chemical exchange.
Sequential assignments for the non-exchangeable resonances were made using 2D NOESY and 3D 13C-edited NOESY experiments to identify sequential H6/8-H1′ NOE connectivities. The sequential base-1′ NOE connectivities are continuous through all 17 nucleotides at long mixing times (≥400 ms). The connectivity is continuous in the 180 ms NOESY spectrum of ASLGly,GCC (Figure 4), but at this mixing time the inter-residue NOE is weak between nucleotides U33 and U34 and broken between nucleotides U34 and C35 in spectra of ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC. In addition, while peak overlap near the diagonal prevented detection of many potential H6-H6 inter-residue NOEs, sequential H5-H6 crosspeaks were identified that support stacking of several pyrimidine bases in the loop regions of ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC.
Figure 4.
Sequential connectivities in the 400 ms mixing time NOE spectrum of the ASLGly,GCC molecule. The correlations between N34 and U35 are weak in the spectra of all ASLGly molecules. Also, the sequential connectivity between C35 and C36 is weak in this spectrum.
The NH and NH2 resonances were assigned using 1H-1H NOESY and HNCCH experiments. For all molecules, the NH resonances of the first five neighboring base pairs yield NOE connectivities between each other. For ASLGly,GCC and np-ASLGly,UCC, the NH resonance connectivities extend to a sixth base pair. The NH spectrum of ASLGly,GCC contains a broad guanine NH resonance at 10.56 ppm that was assigned to G34. The U33 NH resonance at 12.95 ppm of ASLGly,GCC is broad and very weak as well. The U33 and U34 NH resonances of ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC also are broad and only observed in the 1D spectra between 10.5 and 11.5 ppm. The cytidine and adenine NH2 resonances were assigned via scalar correlations using HSQC and HNCCH experiments. The upfield chemical shifts (7.20 and 6.69 ppm) of the C32 H4 resonances of ASLGly,UCC are consistent with the lack of intra-molecular hydrogen bonding (Figure 5). In all molecules, the C35 and C36 NH2 1H resonance pairs and the NH2 15N resonances are shifted upfield by ~1 ppm (1H) and ~2 ppm (15N) relative to those of the base paired cytidine residues (Figure 5). The C37 NH2 resonances of np-ASLGly,UCC exhibit similar upfield shifts.
Figure 5.
Comparison of the cytidine NH2 regions from 15N-1H HSQC spectra of (A) ASLGly,GCC, (B) ASLGly,UCC with Co(NH3)63+, and (C) np-ASLGly,UCC with Mg2+ RNA hairpins. Hydrogen bonding leads to a downfield shift of the N4 and participating H4 resonances. The C35 and C36 (and C37 of np-ASLGly,UCC) NH2 resonances of all three molecules cluster upfield, indicating the absence of hydrogen bonding. In the U-turn formed by the anticodon loop of tRNACys, the C35 NH2 group hydrogen bonds with the 2′-OH of U33 23. An analogous interaction, and corresponding downfield shift of the C35 NH2 resonances, would be predicted if the glycyl-tRNA anticodon loops adopted U-turn motifs.
The inter-nucleotide phosphate 31P resonances are clustered between −3.54 and −4.60 ppm for all molecules and partial assignments were obtained using HCP or 31P-1H hetero-TOCSY-NOESY spectra 42. The P–H3′ correlations and several P–H4′ and P–H5′/H5″ correlations are present in 31P-1H HetCor spectra and provide independent confirmation of the 31P assignments. Notably, the 31P resonances of ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC remain tightly grouped indicating that the metal ions have little effect on the phosphate backbone conformation (Figure 3) and point to weak metal ion coordination to the phosphate backbone. A complete list of resonance assignments, including non-protonated positions, is given in Table S1.
Metal ions and the RNA hairpins
In high-resolution structure studies of tRNA, Mg2+ and Co(NH3)63+ ions have been observed proximal to the loop-helix junction in the anticodon stem-loop of tRNA 43, 44. As noted above, the multivalent ions Co(NH3)63+ and Mg2+ were needed to obtain high-quality spectra for ASLGly,UCC and np- ASLGly,UCC, respectively. In the absence of multivalent ions, the A38 C2 resonance at 148.6 ppm marks the presence of a C32-A+38 base pair in ASLGly,UCC (Figure 3). Both Co(NH3)63+ and Mg2+ lead to loss of this base pair and deprotonation of A38. Mg2+ reduces the conformational variability of the anticodon nucleotides at 10 mM concentration, but causes broadening of resonances throughout the spectrum and substantial spectral overlap in the NOESY. Co(NH3)63+ (2 mM) also reduces the conformational variability of the loop nucleotides, but does not lead to excessive line broadening. The most significant chemical shift change caused by Co(NH3)63+ is the N1 base resonance of G28 (~0.3 ppm). The remaining chemical shift changes involve loop nucleotide resonances and are minor (<0.1 ppm). The resonances of np-ASLGly,UCC exhibit a similar pattern of chemical shift changes with 3 mM Mg2+. The addition of Co(NH3)63+ to np-ASLGly,UCC does not produce additional resonance changes, but was used to localize ion binding. The 90% 1H2O NOESY spectrum supports non-specific association of Co(NH3)63+ in the loop region. In the 90% 1H2O NOESY spectra, NOEs between the guanine and uridine NH and cytidine NH2 protons of the stem with the Co(NH3)63+ protons confirm the expected coordination of Co(NH3)63+ at the G28-U42 base pair45. Although the NOE spectral data defining the stem location of Co(NH3)63+ are very good, the cobalt hexamine complex can only be restricted to the major groove side of the loop. Very weak NOE cross peaks are observed between Co(NH3)63+ and the base protons of residues 32, 33, 37 and 38. However, there is evidence for coordination involving the U33 O4 carbonyl atom of the base. The chemical shifts of the U33 C2 and C4 nuclei (152.2 and 168.2 ppm, respectively) are consistent with participation of the O4 atom in a stable hydrogen bond or in metal ion coordination 33, 34. The addition of Co(NH3)63+ supports metal ion coordination at the U33 O4 by causing additional (~0.2 ppm) upfield and downfield shifts of the C2 and C4 resonances. Coordination of the Mg2+ and Co(NH3)63+ ions may also involve bridging between phosphate groups across the major groove, however, the 31P spectra of both molecules are minimally altered by Co(NH3)63+ relative to Mg2+.
For the ASLGly,GCC RNA, intermediate concentrations of Mg2+ and Co(NH3)63+ ions cause modest exchange broadening of the anticodon nucleotide base resonances. The U33 NH resonance is exchange broadened and not observed and the position of the U39 resonance is shifted upfield ~0.3 ppm. No other resonances in this region exhibit substantial chemical shift changes. The A38 H2 is shifted upfield 0.8 ppm and the A37, U33, and C36 base 6 and 8 resonances are broadened by chemical exchange. Also, no intermolecular NOEs between Co(NH3)63+ protons and loop nucleotide protons could be identified. Thus, although Mg2+ and Co(NH3)63+ associate with the loop region of ASLGly,GCC, the interaction appears weaker than the interaction of these ions with either ASLGly,UCC or np-ASLGly,UCC.
Structure Calculations
The structures of the ASLGly molecules were calculated using a restrained molecular dynamics routine starting from 50 sets of coordinates with randomized backbone dihedral angles. The calculations used a total of 188–211 conformationally restrictive distance constraints and 131–156 dihedral angle constraints (Table 1) to produce 8 converged structures for each molecule (Figure 6). Structures were classified as converged if they were consistent with the NMR data and maintained correct stereochemistry. All converged structures have no constraints violated by more than 0.1 Å. When the structures are arranged in order of increasing overall energy, the converged structures form a plateau with similarly low overall energies and constraint violation energies. The root mean square deviations (RMSDs) of the heavy atoms between the individual structures and the minimized mean structures are 0.39 Å2, 0.83 Å2, and 0.75 Å2 for, ASLGly,GCC, ASLGly,UCC, and np-ASLGly,UCC, respectively. The global fold of ASLGly,GCC is a hairpin composed of a seven base pair stem and a three nucleotide loop (Figure 6). The overall fold of np-ASLGly,UCC is a six base pair stem with a five nucleotide loop (Figure 6). The overall fold of ASLGly,UCC (a five base pair stem with a five to seven nucleotide loop) is similar to np-ASLGly,UCC, but the loss of some inter-residue NOEs among loop nucleotides and the loss of secondary structure proximal to the loop caused by the absence of the 32–38 base pair results in a somewhat less precisely defined loop conformation (Figure 6). The minimized average structures are shown in Figure 7.
Table 1.
Summary of experimental distance and dihedral angle constraints and refinement statistics for ASLGly molecules
| Constraint | ASLGly,GCC | ASLGly,UCC | np-ASLGly,UCC |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOE distance constraints | |||
| intraresiduea | 116 | 106 | 110 |
| interresidue | 94 | 81 | 95 |
| mean number per residue | 12.4 | 11 | 12.1 |
| NOE constraints by category | |||
| strong (1.8 – 3.0 Å) | 32 | 18 | 6 |
| medium (1.8 – 4.5 Å) | 108 | 80 | 89 |
| weak (1.8 – 6.0 Å) | 56 | 82 | 84 |
| very weak (1.8 – 7.0 Å) | 14 | 7 | 26 |
| base pair constraints | |||
| total | 32 | 26 | 32 |
| dihedral angle constraints | |||
| ribose ringb | 48 | 51 | 51 |
| backbone | 71 | 91 | 93 |
| H bonds | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| mean number per residue | 7.7 | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Violations | |||
| average distance constraints > 0.3 Å | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| average dihedral constraints > 0.5° | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RMSD from ideal geometryc | |||
| Heavy Atoms (Å) | 0.39 ± 0.17 | 0.83 ± 0.27 | 0.75 ± 0.9 |
Only conformationally restrictive constraints are included.
Three torsion angles within each ribose ring were used to constrain the ring to either the C2′-endo or C3′-endo conformation.
Calculated against the minimized average structure.
Figure 6.
Superposition of 8 converged structures of (A) ASLGly,GCC, (B) ASLGly,UCC, and (C) np-ASLGly,UCC RNA hairpins. Views are into the major grooves of the anticodon loops. The RMSDs between the individual structures and the average structure are listed in Table 1. The greatest variability occurs among the anticodon bases and reflects the lower number of constraints for these residues.
Figure 7.
Stereoviews of the loop regions of structure of (A) ASLGly,GCC, (B) ASLGly,UCC, and (C) np-ASLGly,UCC RNA hairpins. The coloring scheme is as follows: the anticodon bases N34, C35, and C36 (Red), N31 and N39, (blue), N32 and N38 (green), U33 (pink), and N37 (pink/brown). The base of C35 is depicted in the orientation most frequently observed among the converged structures, although orientations of the base parallel and perpendicular to the helix axis are represented in the three molecules. The spectral data show that the protonated A38-C32 base pair of ASLGly,UCC is lost with addition of divalent metal ion.
For all of the molecules, the helical base stack along the 5′ side of the loop is continuous though residue 34 and is conserved among the converged sets of structures. Base stacking along the 3′ side of the loop varies among the structures. For ASLGly,GCC, the 3′ strand stacking begins with A37. For ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC, the 3′ strand stacking generally begins with C35, but individual structures show moderate deviations (Figures 6). The C35 and C36 nucleotides are common to each of the three families of structures and they distribute along the major groove or minor groove sides of the loops depending upon the family. The general positions of these residues within individual structures of each family, though, are uniform and exhibit few excursions to the opposite side.
Structure of the loop regions of ASLGly molecules
The loop of ASLGly,GCC is composed of nucleotides G34–C36 and is closed by a distorted U33–A37 base pair (Figure 7). The position of the A37 base is restricted by NOE cross peaks (A37 H2-G34 H1′ and A37 H2-A38 H1′) that are characteristic of adenine nucleotides in helices. The hydrogen bond functional groups between U33 and A37 are aligned, but the bases exhibit moderate buckling (25° average among converged structures). The intensity of the U33 NH resonance is weak and could result from solvent exchange. However, the U33 C2 and C4 chemical shifts (152.8 and 168.6 ppm, respectively) and A37 N1 chemical shift (222.1 ppm) are indicative of weak hydrogen bonding and are consistent with the distorted U33–A37 pair. The G34 base extends across the helix axis with the U33 and C35 bases stacking above and beneath, respectively, the major groove edge of the G34 base. The G34-C35 stacking is supported by H8-H6 and H8-H5 NOE cross peaks. The C35 base and its NH2 group point away from the helix axis toward the solvent. The C36 base also resides on the major groove side of the loop with its NH2 group extending toward the solvent, but is not coplanar with the C35 base. The 15N and 1H chemical shifts of the C35 and C36 NH2 groups are shifted upfield (Figure 5) and are consistent with the absence of intra-molecular interactions. The C36 base is vertically displaced from the A37 base and does stack.
The loop of ASLGly,UCC is composed of seven nucleotides, residues C32-A38, with cobalt hexamine leading to deprotonation of the A38 base. Although the C32 and A38 bases maintain an alignment characteristic of the C32-A+38 base pair, the distance between the Watson-Crick faces is increased (Figure 7). The U33 and A37 bases are coplanar and stack beneath C32 and A38, respectively. The A37 base is rotated toward the minor groove causing the N6 amino group to align for hydrogen bonding with the U33 O2 atom. However, the distance between the heavy atoms is long (4.0 Å average) and the U33 C2 and A37 N6 chemical shifts, 153.8 ppm and 80.1 ppm respectively, do not reflect hydrogen bonding involving the O2 and H6 atoms. The base of U34 is on the major groove side of the loop and stacks beneath the U33 base. The bases of C35 and C36 lay on the minor groove side of the helix and stack on each other and beneath A37 with their Watson-Crick edges pointing away from the helix axis toward the solvent. The 1H and 15N resonances of the C35 and C36 NH2 groups are shifted upfield (5.7–6.8 ppm 1H and 93 ppm 15N) and are characteristic of solvent exposed cytidine amino groups (Figure 5).
The loop of np-ASLGly,UCC is composed of residues U33-C37. The bases of U33 and C37 stack beneath C32 and G38, respectively, and neither base is laterally displaced towards the major or minor grooves. However, C37 is rotated so that the Watson-Crick edge of the base points into the minor groove rather than toward the helix axis. The base of C36 is parallel and stacked with C37 in ~80% of the structures, but points down and away from the C37 base in the remaining structures. Both orientations are in agreement with the observed NOE cross peak pattern. Like C37, the Watson-Crick edge of C36 points out toward the minor groove side of the loop in all structures. The base of U34 stacks beneath U33 and is rotated out towards the major groove. C35 is positioned on the minor groove side of the loop at the apex of the phosphate backbone turn. The base of C35 is laterally displaced from and slightly below the base plane of C36. With the exception of U33, the functional groups along the Watson-Crick edges of the loop nucleotide bases are solvent exposed and none form intra-molecular interactions. The C35-C37 NH2 chemical shifts (Table S1) reflect the solvent exposure of these bases.
The sugar-phosphate backbone conformations of the loop nucleotides are surprisingly uniform (Figure 7). The majority of the nucleotides maintain the C3′-endo ring pucker, but the C35 and C36 ribose groups have observable H1′–H2′ couplings and ribose 13C chemical shifts that indicate a mixture of C2′- or C3′-endo ring pucker conformations. In addition, the uniformly small (<5 Hz) P–C2′ coupling constants for the loop residues place the ε torsion angles in the trans conformation characteristic of RNA. The phosphate backbone torsion angles β, γ, and ε of residues 34–36 were loosely constrained for the calculations, but most have values within the range common to RNA helices, and the majority of deviations from standard values involve residue C34. The 31P chemical shifts for all inter-residue phosphorus atoms are tightly clustered between −3.5 and −4.6 ppm, indicating that the α and ζ torsion angles throughout the loop and helix adopt a gauche conformation 46.
Structure of the ASLGly stems
The conformations of the stems of the three ASLGly molecules are very similar. The geometry of the hairpins from the terminal G27-C43 base pair to 32–38 interaction is primarily A-form (Figure 6). The C32-A+38 of ASLGly,UCC is deprotonated with addition of cobalt hexamine, but the relative arrangement of the two bases is largely unchanged as evidenced by intra- and inter-strand NOEs involving C32 and A38. The base-base and base-ribose NOE cross peaks among the stem nucleotides are continuous and their intensities are consistent with the A-form helical geometry. The torsion angles of the sugar-phosphate backbones involving the stem residues of all molecules also are within the limits of A-form geometry and are supported by chemical shift and J-coupling data.
Discussion
Although the bulk of tRNA in the cell is destined for aminoacylation and delivery to the ribosome for protein synthesis, a variety of alternative functional roles exist for tRNA 47. Besides their central role in translation, tRNA molecules participate in the addition of amino acids to membrane lipids and the N-termini of peptides 9, 10, the biosynthesis of antibiotics and of the crosslinks in peptidoglycan cell walls 3, 4, 11, 12, the regulation of transcription and translation 2, and viral replication 5, 8. Not all tRNA molecules are multifunctional, but in some bacteria the glycyl-tRNA family has extra-ribosomal roles in transcriptional regulation and cell wall biosynthesis. Here we have examined the structural features of three glycyl-tRNA molecules that serve these three functions.
Comparison of the ASLGly structures
The structures of the tRNAGly anticodon arm stems (residues 27–32 and 38–43) are nearly the same even though ASLGly,UCC has a C-A mismatch rather than the U-A and G-C pairs present in ASLGly,GCC and np-ASLGly,UCC, respectively. The A38 of ASLGly,UCC is deprotonated in the presence of Co(NH3)63+ but the basic structural features of the C32-A38+ base pair, coplanarity of the two bases and minimal lateral displacement from the helix axis, are conserved. In all of the molecules, the base of residue 34 stacks with U33, and is moderately displaced toward the major groove edge of U33. Also common to the three structures is the minor groove displacement of the base of residue 37. The most notable structural differences among the molecules are the orientations of nucleotides C35 and C36. In ASLGly,GCC, these nucleotides are positioned on the major groove side of the loop whereas in ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC, these residues are located on the minor groove side of the loop (Figure 7). The anticodon nucleotides of the three sequences also exhibit similar sugar pucker behavior. The riboses of nucleotides C35 and C36 appear to oscillate between C2′-endo and C3′-endo conformations as they give rise to cross peaks with modest (≈5 Hz) coupling in the DQF-COSY spectrum and intermediate 13C chemical shifts. To determine if the base positions are equally accommodated by the canonical ribose conformations we performed a series of simulations where the ribose pucker conformations of C35 and C36 were fixed to C2′-endo or C3′-endo. In about 50% of the ASLGly,GCC structures, the C2′-endo pucker leads to a small downward rotation of the C36 base toward the helix axis and away from the major groove side of the loop. For ASLGly,UCC and np-ASLGly,UCC, the enforcement of C2′-endo pucker widens the curvature of the phosphate backbone through the loop with minimal effect on the positions of the bases in the loop. Neither the number of NOE violations nor the overall energies for the three molecules are changed significantly by applying the C2′-endo constraints. Thus, the average conformational states of the ribose puckers are consistent with the calculated sets of structures introduce a conformational malleability that may be needed to optimize anticodon loop nucleotide interactions in different contexts.
Comparison with structures of other anticodon stem-loop sequences
The crystal structure of fully modified yeast tRNAPhe revealed what is now known to be a common RNA structural motif designated the U-turn 48, 49. This functionally important motif has since been observed in the structures of a host of other RNA molecules including the signal recognition particle 50 and RNA tetraloops 51, 52 (Figure 8). In the context of the tRNA anticodon arm, the U-turn has been observed in crystal forms of unmodified E. coli tRNAPhe (anticodon 5′-GAA-3′) 53, an E. coli tRNACys –EF-Tu complex (anticodon 5′-GCA-3′) 23, the ribosome-bound E. coli tRNALys,3 anticodon 5′-UUU-3′) 54, and the solution forms of partly modified E. coli tRNAPhe and fully modified tRNALys,3 43, 55 (Figure 8). The U-turn motif of the tRNA anticodon arm is characterized by a 120° turn of the phosphate backbone between residues 33 and 34 and stacking of the three anticodon nucleotide bases on the 3′ side of the loop. The U-turn of tRNA has been observed to contain hydrogen bonds between the U33 2′-OH and the N7 or N4H2 of purine or cytidine residues at position 35 and between the U33 N3H and the non-bridging phosphoryl oxygen 5′ to residue 36.
Figure 8.
Comparison of the U-turn motifs from (A) the solution NMR structure of fully modified human tRNALys,3 (PDB 1FL8), (B) the X-ray crystal structure of ribosome bound E. coli tRNALys,3 (PDB 1XMO), (C) the X-ray crystal structure of modified E. coli aa-tRNACys in complex with EF-Tu/GDPNP (PDB 1B23), and (D) the X-ray crystal structure of the hammerhead ribozyme (PDB 299D). The U-turn folds present in A–C are characterized by stacking of the anticodon bases (purple) along the minor groove side of the helix and the NH-P hydrogen bond from U33 (green). In D, the sequence GUAA shows the U-turn fold characteristic of the GNRA tetraloops where the G (green) forms the NH-P hydrogen bond 51. The first (ni) and third (ni+2) nucleotides of the turns are labeled. The 2′-OH-base hydrogen bond between ni and ni+2 involves the base N7 when ni+2 is a purine and the exocyclic amino N4H2 when ni+2 is cytidine. The ni-ni+2 interaction has not been observed in ASLs when uridine occupies the ni+2 position (A and B), although the O4 in principle could perform this function. Modifications on residues 34 and 37 (A and B) provide additional hydrogen bonds in the turn.
The U-turn structural motif that is ubiquitous among anticodon loops of tRNA molecules in the crystal state, is not adopted by any of the ASLGly molecules in this study. In a classic U-turn, the nonsequential U33 H1′ to N35 H6/8 distance is ≈3.8 Å and should give rise to a moderately intense NOE cross peak. Although spectral overlap would occlude the non-sequential U33-C35 1′-base NOE cross peak in np-ASLGly,UCC, this peak is not present in the NOE spectra of ASLGly,GCC or ASLGly,UCC. In addition, NOE cross peaks in the spectra of the ASLGly,GCC and ASLGly,UCC (including U33 H1′ to A38 H2 and G34 or U34 H1′ to A37 H2) are not compatible with the U-turn motif. The reversal of the phosphate backbone occurs smoothly between residues 34 and 36 (Figure 7) and does not turn abruptly between U33 and G34/U34 as observed for the classic U-turn 44, 48, 49, 53. In the U-turn, the trans conformation of the G34/U34 backbone angle α facilitates the sharp turn and is expected to cause the corresponding 31P resonance to shift downfield 2–3 ppm 46, 56. None of the phosphorus spectra of the ASLGly molecules display this unusual feature and are consistent with the gauche angles adopted by the converged structures.
The absence of the U-turn fold from the tRNA anticodon loop in solution is not unique to the ASLGly molecules. The anticodon arms of unmodified and N6-dimethylallyl-A37 (i6A37)-modified tRNATyr, ψ39-modified and N6-threonylcarbamoyl-A37 (t6A37)-modified human tRNALys,3, unmodified E. coli tRNAPhe, and unmodified E. coli tRNAVal also do not have the U-turn structure 57–59. Interestingly, the addition of Mg2+ to unmodified E. coli tRNAVal, i6A37-modified E. coli ASLPhe, and [5-methylcarboxymethyl, 2-thiouridine-34 (mcm5s2U34), t6A37]-modified E. coli ASLLys molecules leads to formation of the U-turn 43, 56, 59. These data highlight crucial roles for base modification and Mg2+ in the formation of the U-turn fold in some sequences. In the glycyl-tRNAs, though, modification of the anticodon loop is sparse or non-existent. There are no modifications in the anticodon arm of bacterial tRNAGly,GCC. Although the presence of Mg2+ disrupts the U33-A37 base pair and increases the mobility of the loop nucleotides, it does not cause reorganization of the loop nucleotides into the U-turn motif. In some bacterial species, the anticodon arm of tRNAGly,UCC contains the 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl (cmnm5) functionality on U34 (Figure 1). This modification is chemically similar to the mcm5s2U34 of E. coli tRNALys,3. Like tRNAGly,UCC, the anticodon sequence of tRNALys,3 is composed only of pyrimidine bases (5′-UUU-3′) with a uridine nucleotide at position 34. In its modified form, a salt bridge exists between the U33pU34 phosphoryl oxygen and the mcm5 modification. However, the adoption of the U-turn in tRNALys,3 also requires thiolation at the base C2 position which strongly promotes the C3′-endo ribose pucker, and the t6A37 modification 55. The cmnm5 modification also promotes the C3′-endo ribose pucker, but much more weakly than C2 thiolation 55, 56. Thus, it is possible that introduction of the cmnm5 modification into ASLGly,UCC could predispose the loop to adopt a U-turn fold, however, this modification alone is unlikely to substantially change the structure of the pyrimidine rich ASLGly,UCC loop 55. Our results do not exclude the possibility that a very small fraction of the population of molecules dynamically samples the U-turn conformation, but evidence for alternative conformations is not visible in HSQC, the most sensitive spectra. It is also possible that although the anticodon loop is physically distal to the body of the tRNA, the conformation of some loop sequences could be altered by the presence of the remainder of the tRNA molecule 53. Modification and/or the presence of metal ions, though, are sufficient to promote the U-turn fold in various sequence-diverse isolated anticodon arms 43, 56, 59.
The tRNAGly molecules are functionally diverse and have sequence variation in the anticodon loops, but all are charged by a single glycyl aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (GlyRS). The orientations of the anticodon nucleotides imposed by the U-turn motif are important for the functional roles of tRNAGly,GCC and tRNAGly,UCC, but a similar presentation of anticodon bases is not required for np-tRNAGly,UCC function. Additionally, C37 of np-tRNAGly,UCC does not provide the same base stacking contribution for the U-turn that is offered by the purine base at position 37 of ribosomal tRNAs. Thus, the different cellular roles of these tRNAGly molecules and their nucleotide sequences do not require or direct the anticodon loops to adopt a common fold. In contrast, the open arrangement of the anticodon loops may aid formation of the GlyRS-tRNAGly complex. Although anticodon residues C35 and C36 are important for synthetase recognition of tRNAGly 60, the details of the interaction are not known 61. Further, the structures of other tRNAs bound to their cognate sythetases offer little insight into the structural details of the GlyRS-tRNAGly interaction. The anticodon loops in synthetase-tRNA complexes exhibit a range of conformations, including the U-turn motif, and only weakly correlate with synthetase class or nucleotide identity. But, the loop region structures of the synthetase-bound tRNA molecules depend on the approach (major groove or minor groove side) of the synthetase to the anticodon loop 23, 62–67. Thus, the open configurations adopted by the ASLGly anticodon loops may facilitate readout of the anticodon bases by GlyRS if the loop is accessed from the minor groove side 61.
Functions of the tRNAGly molecules
The physical properties of the glycyl anticodon stem-loops will have an impact on their various functions. In bacteria that utilize glycine for synthesis of the peptidoglycan cell wall, it appears important that the pool of charged np-tRNAGly,UCC not be diverted into the translation machinery. Exclusion of the np-tRNAGly,UCC from the protein synthesis can be accomplished by two mechanisms. First, the absence of guanine nucleotides at the base of the TψC stem of np-tRNAGly,UCC is predicted to weaken the complex with EF-Tu:GTP 20, 24, thereby limiting ribosome binding of aminoacyl np-tRNAGly,UCC. A second feature of np-ASLGly,UCC that may protect against participation in ribosome-catalyzed translation is the cytidine nucleotide at position 37. In proteinogenic tRNA molecules, residue 37 is a purine nucleotide that is modified in most cases. The purine-37 residue confers additional stacking energy for the codon-anticodon helix. tRNAPhe molecules containing unmodified G or A nucleotides at position 37 bind the ribosome A-site more rapidly and are released more slowly than tRNAPhe molecules containing C or U 68. Thus, the C37 of np-tRNAGly,UCC may act to further limit its contribution to protein biosynthesis, a possible stop-gap since the sole glycyl-tRNA synthetase enzyme relies in part on a common fold of the tRNAGly,UCC and np-tRNAGly,UCC anticodon loops for activity. Interestingly, although the structures of the proteinogenic and non-proteinogenic tRNAGly anticodon arms are remarkably similar and exhibit similar responses to metal ions, the Tm of the np-ASLGly,UCC stem is 10 °C higher than the Tm of the ASLGly,UCC stem which can be attributed in part to the different 32–38 pairings in the two molecules (Figure 2). If np-tRNAGly lacks the ability to interact with the codon GGC to any significant degree, then regulation of the glyQS riboswitch would be responsive only to the pool of uncharged proteinogenic tRNAGly.
Glycine is a member of the four-codon box family in which the codon nucleotide sequences differ only at the third, or wobble, position and the four possible codon combinations designate a single amino acid. In E. coli, there are three glycine isoacceptor tRNAs. tRNAGly,CCC is the most discriminating and translates only the codon GGG to any significant degree 27. E. coli tRNAGly,UCC, in which the U34 modification is not identified but could be mnm5 or cmnm5, translates all four glycine codons but translates codons GGU and GGC with ~25% the efficiency of tRNAGly,GCC 27. In B. subtilis, which contains only two isoacceptors, tRNAGly,GCC and tRNAGly,UCC, U34 of tRNAGly,UCC has the modification cmnm5. The cmnm5 modification can facilitate stacking of residues 34 and 35 and increase codon discrimination. tRNAGly,UCC is the sole glycyl-tRNA present in Mycoplasma mycoides and the only anticodon arm modification is N6-methyl A37 (Figure 1). Like the E. coli tRNAGly,UCC, the M. mycoides glycyl-tRNA translates the four glycine codons without discrimination 27, 69, but the translational efficiency of codons GGU and GGC is ~50% the efficiency of E. coli tRNAGly,GCC 27. A key to the ability of the M. mycoides tRNAGly,UCC to read codons efficiently without discrimination was determined to be the C32-A38 base pair 69. Although E. coli tRNAGly,UCC also contains the C32-A38 base pair, the modification of U34 and/or lack of modification of A37 may curtail the ability of tRNAGly,UCC to read the four glycine codons with equal efficiency.
The ability of tRNAs to discriminate codon triplets based on the third codon nucleotide is a balance of contributions from modification of tRNA residues 34 and 37, the identity of residues 32 and 38, and the purine/pyrimidine composition of residues 35 and 36 25, 69. The property of codon discrimination exhibits modest correlation with the propensity of the U34 ribose pucker to adopt the C3′-endo conformation, which leads to a more conformationally ordered anticodon loop. The C2 thiolation present in some split codon boxes strongly reinforces the C3′-endo conformation 56. The mcm5 and cmnm5 also tend to favor the C3′-endo conformation, as does the 5-oxyacetic acid (cmo5) modification, but to an even lesser extent 56, 70. The ribose conformations of residue 34 in ASLGly,GCC and ASLGly,UCC are a mixture of C3′- and C2′-endo conformations. While cmnm5 modification of U34 could change this equilibrium in B. subtilis (or E. coli) tRNAGly,UCC, the tRNAGly,GCC is unmodified and would be unchanged in vivo.
In six of the eight four-codon boxes, the cognate tRNA molecules with U34 contain the modification cmo5 that suppresses wobble base discrimination 70 (Figure 1) and expands codon reading. One question that arises is why U34 of glycyl and arginyl tRNAs carry the mnm5 or cmnm5 modifications rather than cmo5 when restricted codon reading appears unnecessary. In tRNAGly and tRNAArg, U34 is followed by a cytidine whereas in the six other four-codon boxes, U34 is followed by a purine nucleotide. It is possible that A or G at position 35 facilitates a stacking of the loop bases, as evidenced by Mg2+-induced U-turn formation in unmodified tRNAVal 59, that is less easily accomplished by the cytidine base and modification of U34 with cmo5 indirectly compensates for this positive contribution to loop ordering.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Malgorzata Michnicka for preparation of the T7 RNA polymerase and synthesis of the labeled 5′-nucleotide triphosphates. The 800 MHz NMR spectrometer was purchased with funds from the W. M. Keck Foundation and the John S. Dunn Foundation.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant (GM73969) to E.P.N.
Abbreviations
- tRNAGly,GCC
tRNA with anticodon sequence 5′-GCC-3′
- tRNAGly,UCC
tRNA with anticodon sequence 5′-UCC-3′
- ASLGly,GCC
anticodon stem-loop of Staphylococcus aureus tRNAGly, GCC
- ASLGly,UCC
anticodon stem-loop of Staphylococcus aureus tRNAGly, UCC
- np-ASLGly,UCC
anticodon stem-loop of Staphylococcus aureus non-proteinogenic tRNAGly, UCC
- NTP
nucleoside triphosphate
- NMR
nuclear magnetic resonance
- NOE
nuclear Overhauser effect
- NOESY
NOE spectroscopy
- 2D
two dimensional
- 3D
three dimensional
- HetCor
heteronuclear correlation
- HSQC
heteronuclear single quantum coherence
- MD
molecular dynamics
- RMSD
root mean square deviation
- NH
imino
- NH2
amino
Footnotes
Accession Numbers
Coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers PDB ID: 2LBJ, 2LBK, and 2LBL. Chemical shifts have been deposited in the Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance Bank under accession numbers BMRB ID: 102194, 102195, and 102196.
A table listing the chemical shifts of the three RNA sequences is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Henkin TM, Glass BL, Grundy FJ. Analysis of the Bacillus subtilis tyrS gene: conservation of a regulatory sequence in multiple tRNA synthetase genes. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:1299–1306. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.4.1299-1306.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Henkin TM, Yanofsky C. Regulation by transcription attenuation in bacteria: how RNA provides instructions for transcription termination/antitermination decisions. Bioessays. 2002;24:700–707. doi: 10.1002/bies.10125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bumsted RM, Dahl JL, Soll D, Strominger JL. Biosynthesis of the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls. X. Further study of the glycyl transfer ribonucleic acids active in peptidoglycan synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem. 1968;243:779–782. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roberts RJ. Staphylococcal transfer ribonucleic acids. II. Sequence analysis of isoaccepting glycine transfer ribonucleic acids IA and IB from Staphylococcus epidermidis Texas 26. J Biol Chem. 1974;249:4787–4796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barat C, Lullien V, Schatz O, Keith G, Nugeyre MT, Gruninger-Leitch F, Barre-Sinoussi F, LeGrice SF, Darlix JL. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase specifically interacts with the anticodon domain of its cognate primer tRNA. The EMBO journal. 1989;8:3279–3285. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08488.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bilbille Y, Vendeix FAP, Guenther R, Malkiewicz A, Ariza X, Vilarrasa J, Agris PF. The structure of the human tRNALys3 anticodon bound to the HIV genome is stabilized by modified nucleosides and adjacent mismatch base pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:3342–3353. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Palmer MT, Kirkman R, Kosloff BR, Eipers PG, Morrow CD. tRNA isoacceptor preference prior to retrovirus Gag-Pol junction links primer selection and viral translation. J Virol. 2007;81:4397–4404. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02643-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Colicelli J, Goff SP. Structure of a cloned circular retroviral DNA containing a tRNA sequence between the terminal repeats. J Virol. 1986;57:674–677. doi: 10.1128/jvi.57.2.674-677.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Peschel A, Jack RW, Otto M, Collins LV, Staubitz P, Nicholson G, Kalbacher H, Nieuwenhuizen WF, Jung G, Tarkowski A, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. Staphylococcus aureus resistance to human defensins and evasion of neutrophil killing via the novel virulence factor MprF is based on modification of membrane lipids with l-lysine. J Exp Med. 2001;193:1067–1076. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.9.1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Roy H, Ibba M. RNA-dependent lipid remodeling by bacterial multiple peptide resistance factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:4667–4672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800006105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garg RP, Gonzalez JM, Parry RJ. Biochemical characterization of VlmL, a Seryl-tRNA synthetase encoded by the valanimycin biosynthetic gene cluster. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:26785–26791. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603675200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gondry M, Sauguet L, Belin P, Thai R, Amouroux R, Tellier C, Tuphile K, Jacquet M, Braud S, Courcon M, Masson C, Dubois S, Lautru S, Lecoq A, Hashimoto S, Genet R, Pernodet JL. Cyclodipeptide synthases are a family of tRNA-dependent peptide bond-forming enzymes. Nat Chem Biol. 2009;5:414–420. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marshall L, Kenneth NS, White RJ. Elevated tRNAiMet synthesis can drive cell proliferation and oncogenic transformation. Cell. 2008;133:78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kamhi E, Raitskin O, Sperling R, Sperling J. A potential role for initiator-tRNA in pre-mRNA splicing regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:11319–11324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911561107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Grundy FJ, Winkler WC, Henkin TM. tRNA-mediated transcription antitermination in vitro: codon-anticodon pairing independent of the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:11121–11126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162366799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yousef MR, Grundy FJ, Henkin TM. Structural transitions induced by the interaction between tRNA(Gly) and the Bacillus subtilis glyQS T box leader RNA. J Mol Biol. 2005;349:273–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vitreschak AG, Mironov AA, Lyubetsky VA, Gelfand MS. Comparative genomic analysis of T-box regulatory systems in bacteria. RNA. 2008;14:717–735. doi: 10.1261/rna.819308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Benson TE, Prince DB, Mutchler VT, Curry KA, Ho AM, Sarver RW, Hagadorn JC, Choi GH, Garlick RL. X-ray crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus FemA. Structure. 2002;10:1107–1115. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00807-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Berger-Bachi B, Tschierske M. Role of fem factors in methicillin resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 1998;1:325–335. doi: 10.1016/s1368-7646(98)80048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Giannouli S, Kyritsis A, Malissovas N, Becker HD, Stathopoulos C. On the role of an unusual tRNAGly isoacceptor in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochimie. 2009;91:344–351. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sprinzl M, Horn C, Brown M, Ioudovitch A, Steinberg S. Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:148–153. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.1.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nissen P, Kjeldgaard M, Thirup S, Polekhina G, Reshetnikova L, Clark BF, Nyborg J. Crystal structure of the ternary complex of Phe-tRNAPhe, EF-Tu, and a GTP analog. Science. 1995;270:1464–1472. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nissen P, Thirup S, Kjeldgaard M, Nyborg J. The crystal structure of Cys-tRNACys-EF-Tu-GDPNP reveals general and specific features in the ternary complex and in tRNA. Structure. 1999;7:143–156. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80021-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sanderson LE, Uhlenbeck OC. The 51–63 base pair of tRNA confers specificity for binding by EF-Tu. RNA. 2007;13:835–840. doi: 10.1261/rna.485307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Agris PF. Bringing order to translation: the contributions of transfer RNA anticodon-domain modifications. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:629–635. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Agris PF. Decoding the genome: a modified view. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:223–238. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Samuelsson T, Axberg T, Boren T, Lagerkvist U. Unconventional reading of the glycine codons. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:13178–13184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Claesson C, Samuelsson T, Lustig F, Boren T. Codon reading properties of an unmodified transfer RNA. FEBS Lett. 1990;273:173–176. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81077-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Claesson C, Lustig F, Boren T, Simonsson C, Barciszewska M, Lagerkvist U. Glycine codon discrimination and the nucleotide in position 32 of the anticodon loop. J Mol Biol. 1995;247:191–196. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Davanloo P, Rosenberg AH, Dunn JJ, Studier FW. Cloning and Expression of the Gene for Bacteriophage-T7 RNA-Polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1984;81:2035–2039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nikonowicz EP, Sirr A, Legault P, Jucker FM, Baer LM, Pardi A. Preparation of 13C and 15N Labeled RNAs for Heteronuclear Multidimensional NMR-Studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:4507–4513. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.17.4507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang J, Henkin TM, Nikonowicz EP. NMR structure and dynamics of the Specifier Loop domain from the Bacillus subtilis tyrS T box leader RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:3388–3398. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang J, Nikonowicz EP. Solution structure of the K-turn and Specifier Loop domains from the Bacillus subtilis tyrS T-box leader RNA. J Mol Biol. 2011;408:99–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Denmon AP, Wang J, Nikonowicz EP. Conformation effects of base modification on the anticodon stem-loop of Bacillus subtilis tRNATyr. J Mol Biol. 2011;412:285–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.O’Neil-Cabello E, Wu Z, Bryce DL, Nikonowicz EP, Bax A. Enhanced spectral resolution in RNA HCP spectra for measurement of 3JC2′P and 3JC4′P couplings and 31P chemical shift changes upon weak alignment. J Biomol NMR. 2004;30:61–70. doi: 10.1023/B:JNMR.0000042952.66982.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Varani G, Aboulela F, Allain FHT. NMR investigation of RNA structure. Prog Nucl Mag Res Spectr. 1996;29:51–127. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schwieters CD, Kuszewski JJ, Tjandra N, Clore GM. The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J Mag Res. 2003;160:65–73. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(02)00014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cabello-Villegas J, Winkler ME, Nikonowicz EP. Solution conformations of unmodified and A37N6-dimethylallyl modified anticodon stem-loops of Escherichia coli tRNAPhe. J Mol Biol. 2002;319:1015–1034. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00382-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Aboul-ela F, Nikonowicz EP, Pardi A. Distinguishing between duplex and hairpin forms of RNA by 15N-1H heteronuclear NMR. FEBS Lett. 1994;347:261–264. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00564-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pardi A. Multidimensional heteronuclear NMR experiments for structure determination of isotopically labeled RNA. Methods Enzymol. 1995;261:350–380. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(95)61017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dieckmann T, Feigon J. Assignment methodology for larger RNA oligonucleotides: application to an ATP-binding RNA aptamer. J Biomol NMR. 1997;9:259–272. doi: 10.1023/a:1018622708674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kellogg GW, Schweitzer BI. Two- and three-dimensional 31P-driven NMR procedures for complete assignment of backbone resonances in oligodeoxyribonucleotides. J Biomol NMR. 1993;3:577–595. doi: 10.1007/BF00174611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cabello-Villegas J, Tworowska I, Nikonowicz EP. Metal ion stabilization of the U-turn of the A37 N6-dimethylallyl-modified anticodon stem-loop of Escherichia coli tRNAPhe. Biochemistry. 2004;43:55–66. doi: 10.1021/bi0353676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shi HJ, Moore PB. The crystal structure of yeast phenylalanine tRNA at 1.93 Å resolution: A classic structure revisited. RNA. 2000;6:1091–1105. doi: 10.1017/s1355838200000364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kieft JS, Tinoco I. Solution structure of a metal-binding site in the major groove of RNA complexed with cobalt (III) hexammine. Structure. 1997;5:713–721. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00225-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gorenstein DG. Phosphorus-31 NMR: Principles and Applications. Academic Press; New York: 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Banerjee R, Chen S, Dare K, Gilreath M, Praetorius-Ibba M, Raina M, Reynolds NM, Rogers T, Roy H, Yadavalli SS, Ibba M. tRNAs: cellular barcodes for amino acids. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:387–395. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Robertus JD, Ladner JE, Finch JT, Rhodes D, Brown RS, Clark BFC, Klug A. Structure of Yeast Phenylalanine Transfer-RNA at 3 Å Resolution. Nature. 1974;250:546–551. doi: 10.1038/250546a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim SH, Suddath FL, Quigley GJ, Mcpherso A, Sussman JL, Wang AHJ, Seeman NC, Rich A. 3-Dimensional Tertiary Structure of Yeast Phenylalanine Transfer-RNA. Science. 1974;185:435–440. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4149.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schmitz U, Behrens S, Freymann DM, Keenan RJ, Lukavsky P, Walter P, James TL. Structure of the phylogenetically most conserved domain of SRP RNA. RNA. 1999;5:1419–1429. doi: 10.1017/s1355838299991458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jucker FM, Pardi A. GNRA tetraloops make a U-turn. RNA. 1995;1:219–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pley HW, Flaherty KM, McKay DB. Three-dimensional structure of a hammerhead ribozyme. Nature. 1994;372:68–74. doi: 10.1038/372068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Byrne RT, Konevega AL, Rodnina MV, Antson AA. The crystal structure of unmodified tRNAPhe from Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:4154–4162. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Murphy FVt, Ramakrishnan V, Malkiewicz A, Agris PF. The role of modifications in codon discrimination by tRNALys,UUU. Nature Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:1186–1191. doi: 10.1038/nsmb861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Durant PC, Bajji AC, Sundaram M, Kumar RK, Davis DR. Structural effects of hypermodified nucleosides in the Escherichia coli and human tRNALys anticodon loop: the effect of nucleosides s2U, mcm5U, mcm5s2U, mnm5s2U, t6A, and ms2t6A. Biochemistry. 2005;44:8078–8089. doi: 10.1021/bi050343f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sundaram M, Durant PC, Davis DR. Hypermodified nucleosides in the anticodon of tRNALys stabilize a canonical U-turn structure. Biochemistry. 2000;39:12575–12584. doi: 10.1021/bi0014655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Durant PC, Davis DR. Stabilization of the anticodon stem-loop of tRNALys,3 by an A+-C base-pair and by pseudouridine. J Mol Biol. 1999;285:115–131. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cabello-Villegas J, Nikonowicz EP. Solution structure of ψ32-modified anticodon stem-loop of Escherichia coli tRNAPhe. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6961–6971. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vermeulen A, McCallum SA, Pardi A. Comparison of the global structure and dynamics of native and unmodified tRNAVal. Biochemistry. 2005;44:6024–6033. doi: 10.1021/bi0473399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nameki N, Tamura K, Asahara H, Hasegawa T. Recognition of tRNAGly by three widely diverged glycyl-tRNA synthetases. J Mol Biol. 1997;268:640–647. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Logan DT, Mazauric MH, Kern D, Moras D. Crystal structure of glycyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus. EMBO J. 1995;14:4156–4167. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00089.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Biou V, Yaremchuk A, Tukalo M, Cusack S. The 2.9 Å crystal structure of T. thermophilus seryl-tRNA synthetase complexed with tRNASer. Science. 1994;263:1404–1410. doi: 10.1126/science.8128220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rould MA, Perona JJ, Steitz TA. Structural basis of anticodon loop recognition by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. Nature. 1991;352:213–218. doi: 10.1038/352213a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Goldgur Y, Mosyak L, Reshetnikova L, Ankilova V, Lavrik O, Khodyreva S, Safro M. The crystal structure of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus complexed with cognate tRNAPhe. Structure. 1997;5:59–68. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00166-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cavarelli J, Rees B, Ruff M, Thierry JC, Moras D. Yeast tRNAAsp recognition by its cognate class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Nature. 1993;362:181–184. doi: 10.1038/362181a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cusack S, Yaremchuk A, Krikliviy I, Tukalo M. tRNAPro anticodon recognition by Thermus thermophilus prolyl-tRNA synthetase. Structure. 1998;6:101–108. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(98)00011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fukai S, Nureki O, Sekine S, Shimada A, Tao J, Vassylyev DG, Yokoyama S. Structural basis for double-sieve discrimination of L-valine from L-isoleucine and L-threonine by the complex of tRNAVal and valyl-tRNA synthetase. Cell. 2000;103:793–803. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00182-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Konevega AL, Soboleva NG, Makhno VI, Semenkov YP, Wintermeyer W, Rodnina MV, Katunin VI. Purine bases at position 37 of tRNA stabilize codon-anticodon interaction in the ribosomal A site by stacking and Mg2+-dependent interactions. RNA. 2004;10:90–101. doi: 10.1261/rna.5142404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lustig F, Boren T, Claesson C, Simonsson C, Barciszewska M, Lagerkvist U. The nucleotide in position 32 of the tRNA anticodon loop determines ability of anticodon UCC to discriminate among glycine codons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:3343–3347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Vendeix FA, Dziergowska A, Gustilo EM, Graham WD, Sproat B, Malkiewicz A, Agris PF. Anticodon domain modifications contribute order to tRNA for ribosome-mediated codon binding. Biochemistry. 2008;47:6117–6129. doi: 10.1021/bi702356j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








