Abstract
Alterations in the relative abundance of synaptic proteins may contribute to hippocampal synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The extent to which perturbations in synaptic protein expression occur during the earliest stages of cognitive decline remains unclear. We examined protein levels of presynaptic synaptophysin (SYP) and synaptotagmin (SYT), and postsynaptic drebrin (DRB), a marker for dendritic spine plasticity, in the hippocampus of people with an antemortem clinical diagnosis of no cognitive impairment (NCI), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild/moderate AD. Although normalized SYP and SYT levels were preserved, DRB was reduced by approximately 40% in the hippocampus of MCI and AD compared to NCI subjects. This differential alteration of synaptic markers in MCI suggests a selective impairment in hippocampal postsynaptic dendritic plasticity in prodromal AD that likely heralds the onset of memory impairment in symptomatic disease.
Key Words: Alzheimer's disease, Mild cognitive impairment, Synaptic protein, Synaptophysin, Synaptotagmin, Drebrin, Hippocampus
Introduction
Hippocampal synapse loss is a prominent feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD) [1]. Decreases in synaptic density correlate better than amyloid plaques or neurofibrillary tangles with the degree of cognitive impairment in AD, suggesting that synaptic dysfunction contributes to the clinical presentation of the disease [2]. The efficacy of synaptic transmission depends upon the intricate coordination of multiple specialized proteins involved in synaptic vesicle trafficking (e.g. targeting and docking, membrane fusion/exocytosis and endocytosis) and pre- and postsynaptic structure and plasticity [3,4]. Therefore, perturbations in synaptic protein stoichiometry may play a role in synaptic dysfunction in AD. Several studies have shown that the expression levels of select synaptic proteins such as synaptophysin (SYP) [5], synaptotagmin (SYT) [6] and drebrin (DRB) [7] are decreased in the hippocampus in late-stage AD, but whether similar alterations occur in people clinically diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a putative prodromal stage of AD [8], remains unclear. To address this question, we performed quantitative immunoblotting experiments to measure the levels of SYP (a presynaptic vesicle marker), SYT (a synaptic protein critical for Ca2+-dependent neurotransmitter release), and DRB (a postsynaptic dendritic spine marker) in postmortem hippocampus obtained from subjects classified antemortem as no cognitive impairment (NCI), MCI or mild/moderate AD. These findings were correlated with performance on antemortem cognitive tests and postmortem neuropathologic variables.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
Hippocampi were obtained from 32 individuals enrolled in the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center Religious Orders Study (n = 16) [9] or the University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Center (n = 16) [10] who underwent annual detailed clinical evaluations and brain donations at death [9,10,11]. Hippocampal tissue containing the CA subfields and the dentate gyrus was harvested at the level of the lateral geniculate nucleus and frozen on dry ice. Cases were matched for age (85.3 ± 5.9 years, mean ± SD), years of education (16.3 ± 3.6), postmortem interval (4.5 ± 2.3 h) and gender (40% males) and were categorized antemortem as NCI [n = 10; Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score = 28.1 ± 1.9], MCI insufficient to meet criteria for dementia (n = 9; MMSE score = 26.6 ± 3.4), or mild/moderate AD (n = 11; MMSE score = 14.1 ± 8.1) (table 1) [9]. Seven of the 9 MCI cases were amnestic MCI based on impairments in episodic memory alone [8]. A neuropathologist classified each case based on CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) [12], Braak staging [13], and NIA-Reagan [14] diagnostic criteria (table 1).
Table 1.
Clinical, demographic, and neuropathological case characteristics by diagnostic category
| Clinical diagnosis |
p value | Pairwise comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCI (n = 12) | MCIa (n = 9) | ADa (n = 11) | total (n = 32) | |||
| Age at death, years | 83.4 ± 5.9 (75–93) | 86.4 ± 4.2 (80–93) | 86.6 ± 7.1 (75–98) | 85.3 ± 5.9 (75–98) | 0.4b | – |
| Number of males | 3 (25%) | 4 (44%) | 6 (55%) | 13 (40%) | 0.4c | – |
| Years of education | 16.8 ± 3.7 (12–25) | 16.4 ± 2.2 (12–20) | 15.6 ± 4.6 (7–22) | 16.3 ± 3.6 (7–25) | 1.0b | – |
| Number with ApoE ε4 allele | 0 | 1 (11%) | 5 (45%) | 6 (19%) | 0.0094c | NCI < AD |
| MMSE score | 28.1 ± 1.9 (23–30) | 26.6 ± 3.4 (21–30) | 14.1 ± 8.1 (0–24) | 22.8 ± 8.2 (0–30) | <0.000b | (NCI, MCI)> AD |
| Post-mortem interval, h | 4.7 ± 3.3 (1.8–12.4) | 3.9 ± 1.8 (2.3–7.6) | 4.6 ± 1.5 (2.7–7.3) | 4.5 ± 2.3 (1.8–12.4) | 0.5b | – |
| Distribution of Braak scores | ||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | <0.000b | (NCI, MCI) < AD |
| I/II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | ||
| III/IV | 6 | 8 | 1 | 15 | ||
| V/VI | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 | ||
| NIA-Reagan diagnosis (likelihood of AD) | ||||||
| No AD | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | <0.0001b | (NCI, MCI) < AD |
| Low | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | ||
| Intermediate | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | ||
| High | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 | ||
| CERAD diagnosis | ||||||
| No AD | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0.0009b | NCI < AD |
| Possible | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Probable | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 | ||
| Definite | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | ||
Figures are means ± SD with ranges in parentheses unless indicated otherwise.
7 of the 9 MCI cases were amnestic MCI; 7 of the 11 AD cases were mild/moderate AD (i.e. MMSE score ≥10).
Kruskal-Wallis test, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Fisher's exact test, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Quantitative Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting was performed using a previously reported procedure [11]. Briefly, frozen hippocampi were homogenized with protease inhibitors and centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. S1 fraction proteins (25 μg/sample) were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to Immobilon P membranes (Millipore, Mass., USA), blocked in Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.4)/0.1% Tween-20/5% milk, and incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse anti-SYP (clone SY38; 1:1,000; MP Biomedicals, Calif., USA), mouse anti-SYT (clone 41; 1:2,000; BD Transduction Labs, Calif., USA), and mouse anti-DRB (clone M2F6; 1:2,000; MBL International, Mass., USA) in blocking buffer. Membranes were also incubated with mouse anti-tubulin (clone KMX-1; 1:50,000; Chemicon, Calif., USA) as the loading control; hence, for quantitative analysis, synaptic protein levels were normalized to tubulin levels in each sample [11]. Blots were incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:8,000; Pierce, Ill., USA) and reactivity was quantified using Kodak 1D image analysis software (Perkin-Elmer, Mass., USA). Each sample was analyzed on three different Western blots in independent experiments.
Statistical Analysis
Synaptic protein levels were compared among groups using Kruskal-Wallis testing with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Relationships between synaptic protein levels and clinical and pathologic variables were assessed by Spearman correlation. The level for statistical significance was set at 0.05 (two-tailed).
Results
Hippocampal Synaptic Protein Levels in MCI and AD
There were no significant differences in mean hippocampal SYP or SYT levels across the clinical groups (fig. 1; table 2). By contrast, mean DRB protein levels were decreased by approximately 40–45% in MCI and AD compared to NCI (fig. 1; table 2). SYP, SYT, or DRB levels were not correlated with either antemortem performance on the MMSE, episodic memory tests referable to hippocampal function (e.g. logical memory immediate recall) [9], or postmortem Braak, CERAD, or NIA-Reagan neuropathological scores.
Fig. 1.
Representative immunoblot showing hippocampal DRB, SYT, SYP, and β-tubulin (β-TUB) immunoreactivity in samples from NCI, MCI, and AD subjects.
Table 2.
Summary of hippocampal DRB, SYP, and SYT levels by diagnosis category
| Clinical diagnosis (mean ± SD) |
p valuea | Pairwise comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCI (n = 12) | MCI (n = 9) | AD (n = 11) | total (n = 32) | |||
| DRB | 0.43 ±0.20 (0.18–0.84) | 0.24 ±0.13 (0.06–0.49) | 0.25 ±0.13 (0.07–0.45) | 0.32 ±0.18 (0.06–0.84) | 0.045 | NCI> (MCI, AD) |
| SYP | 3.64 ±1.33 (1.41–6.38) | 3.32 ±1.55 (0.92–5.69) | 3.80 ±1.89 (1.51–6.86) | 3.60 ±1.56 (0.92–6.86) | 0.84 | – |
| SYT | 0.88 ±0.39 (0.35–1.62) | 0.91 ±0.45 (0.34–1.64) | 0.94 ±0.61 (0.41–2.32) | 0.91 ±0.47 (0.34–2.32) | 0.97 | – |
Figures in parentheses indicate ranges.
Kruskal-Wallis test, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Discussion
Synapse loss in the hippocampus correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in AD [1], yet the pathogenic mechanisms underlying synaptic dysfunction remain unclear. Previous reports have demonstrated preferential reductions in specific synaptic proteins in late-stage AD, including SYP [5], SYT [6], and DRB [7]. The present quantitative immunoblotting study revealed that DRB levels were also selectively reduced in MCI and early-stage AD, whereas SYP and SYT levels were stable across diagnostic groups, indicating that alterations in the expression of synaptic regulatory elements occur early in the disease process. These findings are similar to those found in the temporal neocortex, where levels of DRB were reduced in MCI, SYP was decreased only in late-stage AD, and SYT was stable during the progression of AD [11].
Functionally, SYP is a key player in membrane trafficking events preceding exocytosis, whereas SYT is a Ca2+ microsensor that modulates activity-dependent exocytosis [15]. Hence, hippocampal presynaptic efficacy may be relatively preserved in the prodromal stages of AD. Alternatively, the stability of these presynaptic markers may reflect the ability of the hippocampus to display biochemical plasticity in MCI [16].
DRB, on the other hand, is an F-actin-binding protein localized to postsynaptic dendritic spines at excitatory synapses [17], where it plays a role in synaptic plasticity by regulating spine morphogenesis [17], organizing postsynaptic densities [18], and targeting receptors [19]. Intriguingly, DRB-dependent clustering of actin was shown to be critical for the postsynaptic targeting of the protein PSD-95, which is also involved in excitatory postsynaptic plasticity [18] and reduced in the MCI hippocampus [10]. The lack of association between DRB levels alone and cognitive performance may signify that alterations of multiple synaptic markers are required to precipitate clinically relevant disturbances in cognition function. Taken together, these findings suggest that the hippocampus displays postsynaptic pathology and decreased synaptic plasticity in the prefatory stages of AD, which over time contributes to the onset of frank dementia.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by: NIH AG14449, AG10161, AG10688 and AG09466 (to E.J.M.), and AG03500 (to S.E.C.).
References
- 1.Scheff SW, Price DA, Schmitt FA, Mufson EJ. Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:1372–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, Hansen LA, Katzman R. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer's disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:572–580. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murthy VN, De Camilli P. Cell biology of the presynaptic terminal. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:701–728. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kennedy MB, Beale HC, Carlisle HJ, Washburn LR. Integration of biochemical signalling in spines. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:423–434. doi: 10.1038/nrn1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Honer WG, Dickson DW, Gleeson J, Davies P. Regional synaptic pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1992;13:375–382. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(92)90111-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Davidsson P, Blennow K. Neurochemical dissection of synaptic pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 1998;10:11–23. doi: 10.1017/s1041610298005110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harigaya Y, Shoji M, Shirao T, Hirai S. Disappearance of actin-binding protein, drebrin, from hippocampal synapses in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci Res. 1996;43:87–92. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490430111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004;256:183–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bennett DA, Wilson RS, Schneider JA, Evans DA, Beckett LA, Aggarwal NT, Barnes LL, Fox JH, Bach J. Natural history of mild cognitive impairment in older persons. Neurology. 2002;59:198–205. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sultana R, Banks WA, Butterfield DA. Decreased levels of PSD95 and two associated proteins and increased levels of BCl2 and caspase 3 in hippocampus from subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: insights into their potential roles for loss of synapses and memory, accumulation of Abeta, and neurodegeneration in a prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88:469–477. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Counts SE, Nadeem M, Lad SP, Wuu J, Mufson EJ. Differential expression of synaptic proteins in the frontal and temporal cortex of elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006;65:592–601. doi: 10.1097/00005072-200606000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM, Vogel FS, Hughes JP, van Belle G, Berg L. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). 2. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1991;41:479–486. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.4.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82:239–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.The National Institute on Aging Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1997;18:S1–S2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sudhof TC. The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:509–547. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.DeKosky ST, Ikonomovic MD, Styren SD, Beckett L, Wisniewski S, Bennett DA, Cochran EJ, Kordower JH, Mufson EJ. Upregulation of choline acetyltransferase activity in hippocampus and frontal cortex of elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:145–155. doi: 10.1002/ana.10069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hayashi K, Ishikawa R, Ye LH, He XL, Takata K, Kohama K, Shirao T. Modulatory role of drebrin on the cytoskeleton within dendritic spines in the rat cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 1996;16:7161–7170. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-22-07161.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Takahashi H, Sekino Y, Tanaka S, Mizui T, Kishi S, Shirao T. Drebrin-dependent actin clustering in dendritic filopodia governs synaptic targeting of postsynaptic density-95 and dendritic spine morphogenesis. J Neurosci. 2003;23:6586–6595. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-16-06586.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Takahashi H, Mizui T, Shirao T. Down-regulation of drebrin A expression suppresses synaptic targeting of NMDA receptors in developing hippocampal neurones. J Neurochem. 2006;97(suppl 1):110–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

