Skip to main content
Cell Adhesion & Migration logoLink to Cell Adhesion & Migration
. 2012 Jan 1;6(1):13–17. doi: 10.4161/cam.19845

Role of the actin-binding protein profilin1 in radial migration and glial cell adhesion of granule neurons in the cerebellum

Marco B Rust 1,*, Jan A Kullmann 1, Walter Witke 2
PMCID: PMC3364132  PMID: 22647936

Abstract

Profilins are small G-actin-binding proteins essential for cytoskeletal dynamics. Of the four mammalian profilin isoforms, profilin1 shows a broad expression pattern, profilin2 is abundant in the brain, and profilin3 and profilin4 are restricted to the testis. In vitro studies on cancer and epithelial cell lines suggested a role for profilins in cell migration and cell-cell adhesion. Genetic studies in mice revealed the importance of profilin1 in neuronal migration, while profilin2 has apparently acquired a specific function in synaptic physiology. We recently reported a mouse mutant line lacking profilin1 in the brain; animals display morphological defects that are typical for impaired neuronal migration. We found that during cerebellar development, profilin1 is specifically required for radial migration and glial cell adhesion of granule neurons. Profilin1 mutants showed cerebellar hypoplasia and aberrant organization of cerebellar cortex layers, with ectopically arranged granule neurons. In this commentary, we briefly introduce the profilin family and summarize the current knowledge on profilin activity in cell migration and adhesion. Employing cerebellar granule cells as a model, we shed some light on the mechanisms by which profilin1 may control radial migration and glial cell adhesion. Finally, a potential implication of profilin1 in human developmental neuropathies is discussed.

Keywords: actin dynamics, Bergmann glia, cerebellar granule neuron, cerebellum, lissencephaly, Miller-Dieker Lissencephaly Syndrome, radial migration

The Profilin Family

More than 30 years ago, profilin was purified from calf spleen and identified as an actin-binding protein.1 Later, profilin was found in all cell types and species investigated, including yeast, plants, amoeba, flies or mammals.2 Four mammalian profilin isoforms have been identified, including the broadly expressed profilin1, the neuron-specific profilin2 and the more recently discovered, and only poorly described, testis-specific profilin3 and profilin4.1,3-5 Although the profilin family members and the profilins from different species share relatively little sequence homologies, the structure and function of these proteins is remarkably conserved.6,7 Profilins catalyze the nucleotide exchange of monomeric actin (G-actin) and funnel ATP-actin to the barbed ends of actin filaments (F-actin).8,9 Thus, profilins can promote actin polymerization by recharging G-actin and by adding it to the filaments’ growing ends. Apart from binding to actin, profilins can interact with phosphoinositides and proteins that contain poly-L-proline-rich domains.10,11 In fact, phospholipid-binding regulates profilin’s interaction with actin and poly-L-proline proteins.10,12 A plethora of proteins interacting with profilin have been identified (for a review see ref. 2). Among them are Rac and Rho effectors, regulators of membrane trafficking, synaptic scaffolding proteins, and focal adhesion proteins, such as VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein), Mena (mouse homolog of Drosophila enabled), EVL (Ena/VASP-like) and palladin. The large number and heterogeneity of interaction partners suggests a role for profilins in various cellular processes. Yet, the physiological relevance of profilin-ligand binding has been shown for only a few interactions. Moreover, whether these interactions provide a mechanism to link cellular processes to actin dynamics, or whether they function independently of actin polymerization is still unclear.

Role of Profilin in Cell Migration and Adhesion of Non-Neuronal Cells

A role for profilin activity in cell migration was discovered almost two decades ago in the soil-living amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.13 Interestingly, the migration phenotype was present only in double mutant cells, but not in mutants lacking either profilin1 or profilin2, suggesting functional redundancy of both profilin isoforms. The importance of profilins for cell migration of multicellular organisms was first observed upon mutating the Drosophila melanogaster profilin-gene chickadee.14 Moreover, silencing profilin1 expression in human vascular endothelial cells slows down migration.15,16 These data led to the general idea that profilin1 fulfills a pro-migratory function in various species and cell types. However, this idea was challenged by studies demonstrating lowered expression levels of profilin1 in various adenocarcinoma cell lines, suggesting that, in these cells, a reduction of profilin1 activity is required for cell migration and cancer cell invasion.17-20 Loss or profilin1 activity also enhances motility of breast cancer cells as well as motility of normal mammary epithelial cells; conversely, a moderate overexpression of profilin1 inhibits cell motility.21,22 Altogether, these studies show that profilin1 functions in a more complex and cell-type specific manner than initially anticipated. Interestingly, defective cell migration upon profilin1 manipulation is associated with impaired formation of focal adhesions and adherence junctions suggesting that primary defects in cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesions contribute to the observed migration phenotypes.15,21,23 Both the actin and the poly-L-proline binding domains of profilin1 appear to be important for cell migration.16 Poly-L-proline ligands of profilin1 that are of particular relevance for cell adhesion and migration are those directly involved in cytoskeletal dynamics such as members of the Ena/VASP protein family or the Rac/Rho effectors WASP (Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein), WAVE (WASP family verprolin-homologous protein) and mDia (mammalian diaphanous).24-27 Since all these profilin1 interaction partners were implicated in actin polymerization at or in the proximity of adherence junctions,28-32 it was hypothesized that they act as scaffolds to spatially recruit profilin1-actin complexes to the zone of active actin remodeling.21 Thus, in cell adhesion, profilin1 may be required to organize actin cytoskeletal structures that are needed to reinforce adhesion complexes. Notably, a recent study also linked profilin1’s phospholipid-binding to cell migration via a mechanism independent of actin or poly-L-proline ligands, adding phospholipid-binding to the complexity of profilin1 function in cell migration.33 The studies summarized above highlight the relevance of profilin activity for the crawling-like movement of cultured cells, which depends on lamellipodial actin-rich protrusions that advance a leading edge in the direction of migration. Although cell culture experiments are informative, the remaining open questions are (1) whether or not profilin activity is relevant for the migration of mammalian cells in a tissue context and (2) whether it plays different roles in specific modes of cell migration, e.g. in neuronal migration. To tackle these two important questions, mouse mutants for profilin1 and profilin2 were generated. Inactivation of profilin2 did not affect brain development or neuronal migration in mice.34 Although profilin2 mutant mice expressed normal levels of profilin1 in the brain, they displayed defects in vesicle exocytosis, neurotransmitter release and novelty-seeking behavior. Based on these data, it was suggested that profilin1 is responsible for the diverse functions required for neuronal migration and early brain development.34 A fundamental role of profilin1 for development was also suggested by the early embryonic lethal phenotype of systemic mutants.35 Using conditional mutant mice, profilin1’s relevance for chondrocyte migration and lamellipodia formation as well as proper focal adhesions was shown.36

Profilin1 is Important for Glial Cell Binding and Radial Migration of Neurons

By combining a conditional profilin1 mouse mutant with a nestin-cre transgenic line, we deleted the profilin1 gene specifically in the brain.37 Nestin-cre mediated deletion occurs in all brain cells and starts around embryonic day 10.5, at the onset of brain development. Mutant mice are viable and show a cerebellar hypoplasia, aberrant organization of cerebellar cortex layers, and ectopic cerebellar granule neurons (CGN). An aberrant organization of cerebellar cortex layers as well as ectopic CGN in the molecular layer result from impaired CGN radial migration, as shown by BrdU (5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine) tracing experiments. Conversely, proliferation of CGN progenitors, CGN survival rates, and axonal outgrowth is normal in the absence of profilin1, suggesting a specific role for profilin1 in CGN migration. Interestingly, the ectopic CGN in profilin1 mutants represent mature neurons which appear to be well-integrated into the neuronal network. This is confirmed by positive staining for CaMKIV (Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV), a marker for mature and postmigratory CGN,38 and the presence of rosette-shaped VGluT2 (vesicular glutamate transporter 2) signals, typical for presynaptic terminals of CGN innervating mossy fibers.39 The morphological defects are restricted to the neuronal compartment, as we found Bergmann glia organization and morphology to be unchanged in profilin1 mutants. Furthermore, this finding excluded structural defects in glial cells as the primary cause for impaired radial migration of CGN.

The alterations, which ultimately translate into the observed radial migration defect, were revealed by co-culture experiments of glial cells and neurons. As CGN can be separated from glial cells by centrifugation, we were able to plate profilin1-deficient CGN on top of control glial cells and, vice versa, control CGN on top of profilin1-deficient glial cells. In these experiments, we noted a significantly impaired glial cell-CGN interaction. Interestingly, we found glial cell-binding and radial migration of CGN equally impaired when profilin1 was absent from either CGN or glial cells, demonstrating that—at least under cell culture conditions—profilin1 activity in CGN as well as in glial cells is required for CGN-glial cell adhesion and radial migration. Hence, we suggest that impaired glial cell adhesion is largely responsible for the radial migration defect of CGN. Future analysis of mouse mutants, in which profilin1 is either deleted from CGN or from glial cells, will allow us to dissect whether profilin1 activity in CGN and/or in glial cells is relevant for radial migration in vivo.

Surprisingly, we detected no migration defect of cultured CGN, when they were allowed to migrate in a glial cell-independent fashion. Before CGN migrate radially along glial fibers, they first perform a glial cell-independent tangential migration,40 which we found to be unaffected in profilin1 mutants. Thus, one can conclude that profilin1 is crucially important for radial migration, yet dispensable for tangential migration. One aspect that should be kept in mind, however, is the presence of profilin2 in the profilin1 mutant cells. It is conceivable that profilin2 has limited functional overlap with profilin1, which might result in a specific rescue in tangentially migrating neurons. Indeed, compensatory mechanisms for profilin1 and profilin2 in neurons were recently suggested.41,42

How Does Profilin1 Control CGN-Glial Cell Adhesion and Radial Migration?

Similar to other radially migrating neurons, CGN express specific cytoskeletal features, including a perinuclear cage of microtubule, a thick band of cortical actin that lines the cell soma and glial cell contact sites beneath the cell body (interstitial junction), and short filopodia (punctae adherentia) that extend from the leading process as it wraps the glial process.43 In a current model of radial CGN migration, these structures operate synergistically to translocate the nucleus and to move the soma toward the direction of migration.44 Actin dynamics within the proximal region of the leading process depends on myosin II motor activity, and is controlled by the conserved polarity protein Par6α during radial migration. It was suggested that contractility of the acto-myosin complex is relevant for pulling the nucleus and soma forward during glial-guided migration.44 Hence, it is tempting to speculate that regulators of actin dynamics, such as profilin1, are required for the functionality of the acto-myosin complex in the leading process and thereby control radial migration of neurons. Notably, other actin-binding proteins were shown to be relevant for radial migration, such as the F-actin depolymerizing factor n-cofilin.45 It will therefore be interesting to assess whether actin dynamics and acto-myosin contractility in migrating CGN are profilin1-dependent.

A number of studies have confirmed the importance of CGN-glial cell adhesion for radial migration, and different molecules, including astrotactin1 and 2, N-cadherin, neuregulin/erbB4 or notch/jagged1, were implicated in this process.46-51 Our analysis adds profilin1 as another novel regulator of CGN-glial cell interaction. In fact, we found reduced levels of vinculin and Mena in junctures of profilin1-deficient CGN and control glial cells. Vinculin is expressed in cell contacts of a variety of cell types, including neurons,52-54 where it strengthens the mechanical link between cell-cell adhesion receptors and the actin cytoskeleton.55 The functional link of profilin1 to cell-cell contact formation is further confirmed by the reduced Mena localization to CGN-glial cell junctions in response to profilin1 inactivation. Mena is a member of the Ena/VASP protein family that is critical for the formation of cell-cell contacts in various cell types.31,56,57 Interestingly, a close interaction of Ena/VASP proteins with profilins was suggested by data showing that these molecules act synergistically in promoting local actin filament elongation58-61 and second, a genetic interaction of profilin1 and Mena had been shown in the mouse.62 Our study directly suggests that in CGN profilin1 acts in common with vinculin and Mena as one possible pathway to control actin dynamics at cell-cell contacts to coordinate glial-guided cell migration. Until now, a role for vinculin or Mena for glial cell-binding of radially migrating neurons has not been demonstrated. However, neutralization of Mena activity in neurons was shown to interfere with radial migration.63

Does Profilin1 Contribute to Neuronal Migration Defects in Humans?

Our mouse model demonstrated that genetic mutation of profilin1 has a major impact on radial migration and the development of layered structures in the brain. As yet, profilin1 mutations have not been described in humans. Remarkably, the human profilin1 gene PFN1 is located on a chromosomal region that has been linked to the autosomal dominant disorder Miller-Dieker Lissencephaly Syndrome (MDLS).64 Additionally, a hereditary cerebellar hyploplasia was recently mapped to this region, but the responsible mutation of this severe neuropathy remains elusive.65 Lissencephaly is characterized by disturbed neuronal migration, microcephaly and delayed growth.66 Genetically, haploinsufficiency of PAFAH1B1 is the major cause for the lissencephalic phenotype in MDLS.67,68 However, other genes must contribute to MDLS in order to explain the broad spectrum of phenotypes described for patients with MDLS and those with isolated PAFAH1B1 mutations.69 For example, deletion of the genes encoding 14-3-3ε and CRK enhance the phenotype in MDLS,70 and it is tempting to speculate on a similar modifier activity of PFN1.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr E. Friauf for critical reading the manuscript. This work was supported by the Research Initiative Membrane Biology (RIMB) of the University of Kaiserslautern.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

G-actin

actin monomer

F-actin

actin filament

VASP

vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein

Mena

mouse homolog of Drosophila enabled

EVL

Ena/VASP-like

WASP

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein

WAVE

WASP-associated verprolin homologous protein

mDia

mammalian diaphanous

CGN

cerebellar granule neurons

BrdU

5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine

CaMKIV

Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV

VGluT2

vesicular glutamate transporter 2

MDLS

Miller-Dieker lissencephaly syndrome

Kullmann JA, Neumeyer A, Gurniak CB, Friauf E, Witke W, Rust MB, et al. Profilin1 is required for glial cell adhesion and radial migration of cerebellar granule neurons. EMBO Rep. 2011;13:75–82. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.211.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Carlsson L, Nyström LE, Sundkvist I, Markey F, Lindberg U. Actin polymerizability is influenced by profilin, a low molecular weight protein in non-muscle cells. J Mol Biol. 1977;115:465–83. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90166-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Witke W. The role of profilin complexes in cell motility and other cellular processes. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:461–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Honore´ B, Madsen P, Andersen AH, Leffers H. Cloning and expression of a novel human profilin variant, profilin II. FEBS Lett. 1993;330:151–5. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80262-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Braun A, Aszódi A, Hellebrand H, Berna A, Fässler R, Brandau O. Genomic organization of profilin-III and evidence for a transcript expressed exclusively in testis. Gene. 2002;283:219–25. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00855-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Obermann H, Raabe I, Balvers M, Brunswig B, Schulze W, Kirchhoff C. Novel testis-expressed profilin IV associated with acrosome biogenesis and spermatid elongation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11:53–64. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Karakesisoglou I, Schleicher M, Gibbon BC, Staiger CJ. Plant profilins rescue the aberrant phenotype of profilin-deficient Dictyostelium cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1996;34:36–47. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1996)34:1<36::AID-CM4>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rothkegel M, Mayboroda O, Rohde M, Wucherpfennig C, Valenta R, Jockusch BM. Plant and animal profilins are functionally equivalent and stabilize microfilaments in living animal cells. J Cell Sci. 1996;109:83–90. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mockrin SC, Korn ED. Acanthamoeba profilin interacts with G-actin to increase the rate of exchange of actin-bound adenosine 5′-triphosphate. Biochemistry. 1980;19:5359–62. doi: 10.1021/bi00564a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tilney LG, Bonder EM, Coluccio LM, Mooseker MS. Actin from Thyone sperm assembles on only one end of an actin filament: a behavior regulated by profilin. J Cell Biol. 1983;97:112–24. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lassing I, Lindberg U. Specific interaction between phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and profilactin. Nature. 1985;314:472–4. doi: 10.1038/314472a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Metzler WJ, Bell AJ, Ernst E, Lavoie TB, Mueller L. Identification of the poly-L-proline-binding site on human profilin. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:4620–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lambrechts A, Verschelde JL, Jonckheere V, Goethals M, Vandekerckhove J, Ampe C. The mammalian profilin isoforms display complementary affinities for PIP2 and proline-rich sequences. EMBO J. 1997;16:484–94. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.3.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haugwitz M, Noegel AA, Karakesisoglou J, Schleicher M. Dictyostelium amoebae that lack G-actin-sequestering profilins show defects in F-actin content, cytokinesis, and development. Cell. 1994;79:303–14. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90199-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Verheyen EM, Cooley L. Profilin mutations disrupt multiple actin-dependent processes during Drosophila development. Development. 1994;120:717–28. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.4.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ding Z, Lambrechts A, Parepally M, Roy P. Silencing profilin-1 inhibits endothelial cell proliferation, migration and cord morphogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:4127–37. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ding Z, Gau D, Deasy B, Wells A, Roy P. Both actin and polyproline interactions of profilin-1 are required for migration, invasion and capillary morphogenesis of vascular endothelial cells. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:2963–73. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Janke J, Schlüter K, Jandrig B, Theile M, Kölble K, Arnold W, et al. Suppression of tumorigenicity in breast cancer cells by the microfilament protein profilin 1. J Exp Med. 2000;191:1675–86. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.10.1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oien KA, Vass JK, Downie I, Fullarton G, Keith WN. Profiling, comparison and validation of gene expression in gastric carcinoma and normal stomach. Oncogene. 2003;22:4287–300. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grønborg M, Kristiansen TZ, Iwahori A, Chang R, Reddy R, Sato N, et al. Biomarker discovery from pancreatic cancer secretome using a differential proteomic approach. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:157–71. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500178-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu N, Zhang W, Yang Y, Liang YL, Wang LY, Jin JW, et al. Profilin 1 obtained by proteomic analysis in all-trans retinoic acid-treated hepatocarcinoma cell lines is involved in inhibition of cell proliferation and migration. Proteomics. 2006;6:6095–106. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zou L, Jaramillo M, Whaley D, Wells A, Panchapakesa V, Das T, et al. Profilin-1 is a negative regulator of mammary carcinoma aggressiveness. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:1361–71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bae YH, Ding Z, Zou L, Wells A, Gertler F, Roy P. Loss of profilin-1 expression enhances breast cancer cell motility by Ena/VASP proteins. J Cell Physiol. 2009;219:354–64. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zou L, Hazan R, Roy P. Profilin-1 overexpression restores adherens junctions in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in R-cadherin-dependent manner. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2009;66:1048–56. doi: 10.1002/cm.20407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reinhard M, Giehl K, Abel K, Haffner C, Jarchau T, Hoppe V, et al. The proline-rich focal adhesion and microfilament protein VASP is a ligand for profilins. EMBO J. 1995;14:1583–9. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07146.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suetsugu S, Miki H, Takenawa T. The essential role of profilin in the assembly of actin for microspike formation. EMBO J. 1998;17:6516–26. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miki H, Suetsugu S, Takenawa T. WAVE, a novel WASP-family protein involved in actin reorganization induced by Rac. EMBO J. 1998;17:6932–41. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.23.6932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Watanabe N, Madaule P, Reid T, Ishizaki T, Watanabe G, Kakizuka A, et al. p140mDia, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila diaphanous, is a target protein for Rho small GTPase and is a ligand for profilin. EMBO J. 1997;16:3044–56. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Carramusa L, Ballestrem C, Zilberman Y, Bershadsky AD. Mammalian diaphanous-related formin Dia1 controls the organization of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell junctions. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:3870–82. doi: 10.1242/jcs.014365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ivanov AI, Hunt D, Utech M, Nusrat A, Parkos CA. Differential roles for actin polymerization and a myosin II motor in assembly of the epithelial apical junctional complex. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:2636–50. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-01-0043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kobielak A, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E. Mammalian formin-1 participates in adherens junctions and polymerization of linear actin cables. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:21–30. doi: 10.1038/ncb1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Scott JA, Shewan AM, den Elzen NR, Loureiro JJ, Gertler FB, Yap AS. Ena/VASP proteins can regulate distinct modes of actin organization at cadherin-adhesive contacts. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:1085–95. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-07-0644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yamazaki D, Oikawa T, Takenawa T. Rac-WAVE-mediated actin reorganization is required for organization and maintenance of cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:86–100. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bae YH, Ding Z, Das T, Wells A, Gertler F, Roy P. Profilin1 regulates PI(3,4)P2 and lamellipodin accumulation at the leading edge thus influencing motility of MDA-MB-231 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:21547–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002309107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pilo Boyl P, Di Nardo A, Mulle C, Sassoè-Pognetto M, Panzanelli P, Mele A, et al. Profilin2 contributes to synaptic vesicle exocytosis, neuronal excitability, and novelty-seeking behavior. EMBO J. 2007;26:2991–3002. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Witke W, Sutherland JD, Sharpe A, Arai M, Kwiatkowski DJ. Profilin I is essential for cell survival and cell division in early mouse development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:3832–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051515498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Böttcher RT, Wiesner S, Braun A, Wimmer R, Berna A, Elad N, et al. Profilin 1 is required for abscission during late cytokinesis of chondrocytes. EMBO J. 2009;28:1157–69. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kullmann JA, Neumeyer A, Gurniak CB, Friauf E, Witke W, Rust MB. Profilin1 is required for glial cell adhesion and radial migration of cerebellar granule neurons. EMBO Rep. 2011;13:75–82. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sakagami H, Umemiya M, Kobayashi T, Saito S, Kondo H. Immunological evidence that the beta isoform of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV is a cerebellar granule cell-specific product of the CaM kinase IV gene. Eur J Neurosci. 1999;11:2531–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00675.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kerjan G, Dolan J, Haumaitre C, Schneider-Maunoury S, Fujisawa H, Mitchell KJ, et al. The transmembrane semaphorin Sema6A controls cerebellar granule cell migration. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1516–24. doi: 10.1038/nn1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Che´dotal A. Should I stay or should I go? Becoming a granule cell. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:163–72. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Michaelsen K, Murk K, Zagrebelsky M, Dreznjak A, Jockusch BM, Rothkegel M, et al. Fine-tuning of neuronal architecture requires two profilin isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15780–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004406107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Görlich A, Zimmermann AM, Schober D, Böttcher RT, Sassoè-Pognetto M, Friauf E, et al. Preserved morphology and physiology of excitatory synapses in profilin1-deficient mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Solecki DJ, Govek EE, Tomoda T, Hatten ME. Neuronal polarity in CNS development. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2639–47. doi: 10.1101/gad.1462506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Solecki DJ, Trivedi N, Govek EE, Kerekes RA, Gleason SS, Hatten ME. Myosin II motors and F-actin dynamics drive the coordinated movement of the centrosome and soma during CNS glial-guided neuronal migration. Neuron. 2009;63:63–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bellenchi GC, Gurniak CB, Perlas E, Middei S, Ammassari-Teule M, Witke W. N-cofilin is associated with neuronal migration disorders and cell cycle control in the cerebral cortex. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2347–57. doi: 10.1101/gad.434307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rio C, Rieff HI, Qi P, Khurana TS, Corfas G. Neuregulin and erbB receptors play a critical role in neuronal migration. Neuron. 1997;19:39–50. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80346-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Adams NC, Tomoda T, Cooper M, Dietz G, Hatten ME. Mice that lack astrotactin have slowed neuronal migration. Development. 2002;129:965–72. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.4.965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schmid RS, McGrath B, Berechid BE, Boyles B, Marchionni M, Sestan N, et al. Neuregulin 1-erbB2 signaling is required for the establishment of radial glia and their transformation into astrocytes in cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4251–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630496100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Weller M, Krautler N, Mantei N, Suter U, Taylor V. Jagged1 ablation results in cerebellar granule cell migration defects and depletion of Bergmann glia. Dev Neurosci. 2006;28:70–80. doi: 10.1159/000090754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang W, Mullikin-Kilpatrick D, Crandall JE, Gronostajski RM, Litwack ED, Kilpatrick DL. Nuclear factor I coordinates multiple phases of cerebellar granule cell development via regulation of cell adhesion molecules. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6115–27. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0180-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wilson PM, Fryer RH, Fang Y, Hatten ME. Astn2, a novel member of the astrotactin gene family, regulates the trafficking of ASTN1 during glial-guided neuronal migration. J Neurosci. 2010;30:8529–40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0032-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Arregui CO, Carbonetto S, McKerracher L. Characterization of neural cell adhesion sites: point contacts are the sites of interaction between integrins and the cytoskeleton in PC12 cells. J Neurosci. 1994;14:6967–77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-06967.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.van Horck FP, Lavazais E, Eickholt BJ, Moolenaar WH, Divecha N. Essential role of type I(alpha) phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase in neurite remodeling. Curr Biol. 2002;12:241–5. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00660-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Xu W, Baribault H, Adamson ED. Vinculin knockout results in heart and brain defects during embryonic development. Development. 1998;125:327–37. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.2.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Carisey A, Ballestrem C. Vinculin, an adapter protein in control of cell adhesion signalling. Eur J Cell Biol. 2011;90:157–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Trichet L, Sykes C, Plastino J. Relaxing the actin cytoskeleton for adhesion and movement with Ena/VASP. J Cell Biol. 2008;181:19–25. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Vasioukhin V, Bauer C, Yin M, Fuchs E. Directed actin polymerization is the driving force for epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Cell. 2000;100:209–19. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81559-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gertler FB, Niebuhr K, Reinhard M, Wehland J, Soriano P. Mena, a relative of VASP and Drosophila Enabled, is implicated in the control of microfilament dynamics. Cell. 1996;87:227–39. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81341-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mahoney NM, Janmey PA, Almo SC. Structure of the profilin-poly-L-proline complex involved in morphogenesis and cytoskeletal regulation. Nat Struct Biol. 1997;4:953–60. doi: 10.1038/nsb1197-953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ferron F, Rebowski G, Lee SH, Dominguez R. Structural basis for the recruitment of profilin-actin complexes during filament elongation by Ena/VASP. EMBO J. 2007;26:4597–606. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hansen SD, Mullins RD. VASP is a processive actin polymerase that requires monomeric actin for barbed end association. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:571–84. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201003014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lanier LM, Gates MA, Witke W, Menzies AS, Wehman AM, Macklis JD, et al. Mena is required for neurulation and commissure formation. Neuron. 1999;22:313–25. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81092-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Goh KL, Cai L, Cepko CL, Gertler FB. Ena/VASP proteins regulate cortical neuronal positioning. Curr Biol. 2002;12:565–9. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00725-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kwiatkowski DJ, Aklog L, Ledbetter DH, Morton CC. Identification of the functional profilin gene, its localization to chromosome subband 17p13.3, and demonstration of its deletion in some patients with Miller-Dieker syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1990;46:559–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Türkmen S, Demirhan O, Hoffmann K, Diers A, Zimmer C, Sperling K, et al. Cerebellar hypoplasia and quadrupedal locomotion in humans as a recessive trait mapping to chromosome 17p. J Med Genet. 2006;43:461–4. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.040030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wynshaw-Boris A. Lissencephaly and LIS1: insights into the molecular mechanisms of neuronal migration and development. Clin Genet. 2007;72:296–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00888.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lo Nigro C, Chong CS, Smith AC, Dobyns WB, Carrozzo R, Ledbetter DH. Point mutations and an intragenic deletion in LIS1, the lissencephaly causative gene in isolated lissencephaly sequence and Miller-Dieker syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:157–64. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pilz DT, Matsumoto N, Minnerath S, Mills P, Gleeson JG, Allen KM, et al. LIS1 and XLIS (DCX) mutations cause most classical lissencephaly, but different patterns of malformation. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:2029–37. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.13.2029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dobyns WB, Curry CJ, Hoyme HE, Turlington L, Ledbetter DH. Clinical and molecular diagnosis of Miller-Dieker syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;48:584–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cardoso C, Leventer RJ, Ward HL, Toyo-Oka K, Chung J, Gross A, et al. Refinement of a 400-kb critical region allows genotypic differentiation between isolated lissencephaly, Miller-Dieker syndrome, and other phenotypes secondary to deletions of 17p13.3. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:918–30. doi: 10.1086/374320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Adhesion & Migration are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES