Abstract
In this article, I discuss the hallmarks of hypoxia in vitro and in vivo and review work showing that many types of stem cell proliferate more robustly in lowered oxygen. I then discuss recent studies showing that alterations in the levels and the types of cell and substrate adhesion molecules are a notable response to reduced O2 levels in both cultured primary neural stem cells and brain tissues in response to hypoxia in vivo. The ability of O2 levels to regulate adhesion molecule expression is linked to the Wnt signaling pathway, which can control and be controlled by adhesion events. The ability of O2 levels to influence cell adhesion also has far-reaching implications for development, ischemic trauma and neural regeneration, as well as for cancer and other diseases. Finally I discuss the possibility that the fluctuations in O2 levels known to have occurred over evolutionary time could, by influencing adhesion systems, have contributed to early symbiotic events in unicellular organisms and to the emergence of multicellularity. It is not my intention to be exhaustive in these domains, which are far from my own field of study. Rather this article is meant to provoke and stimulate thinking about molecular evolution involving O2 sensing and signaling during eras of geologic and atmospheric change that might inform modern studies on development and disease.
Keywords: cell adhesion, early earth atmosphere, extracellular matrix, hypoxia, neural stem cells, oxygen
Elevation in Levels of the Hypoxia Inducible Factor, HIF1α, is a Hallmark of Reduced Oxygen Availability in Cell Culture and in Tissues
HIF1α is a constitutively produced protein that is normally hydroxylated by a family of prolyl hydroxylase enzymes, a modification that allows HIF to bind the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein, targeting HIF for proteasomal degradation.1-4 When O2 levels are lowered, hydroxylation is reduced and degradation is prevented. The stabilized HIFα can then translocate into the nucleus and directly transactivate a number of genes to respond to hypoxia, among which are those involved in glycolysis, erythropoiesis, and angiogenesis.4-7 HIFs not only have direct transcriptional targets but also influence signaling systems to alter gene expression.1 It is notable that HIF1α levels have been shown to be activated over a wide range of physiological O2 tensions, although the greatest increases were at levels consistent with hypoxia/ischemia in vivo.8 These findings indicate that levels of HIF are functionally involved in O2 homeostasis in cells and organisms to enable the switch from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism when O2 levels are limiting. It is of interest that mice lacking HIF1α or its homolog HIF2α and their binding partner HIF1β all exhibit embryonic lethality, displaying multiple morphogenetic defects, including failure of neural tube closure.9 The importance of O2 concentration on the formation of the neural folds and neural crest development was recognized in early studies of rat neural maturation in cultured embryos.10
Hypoxia vs. In Situ Normoxia
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines hypoxia as “a deficiency of oxygen reaching the tissues of the body.” In the scientific literature, however, the word is often used to mean a level of O2 lower than that present in air, particularly in studies in vitro. Air does not reflect the in vivo environment of the majority of cell types and hence the term “in situ normoxia” has been suggested.11 This novel term is meant to give a better indication what normoxia or hypoxia would be for a given cell type based on its exposure to O2 in vivo and allow cell culture to mimic more accurately the physiological state, as is beginning to be understood for neural cells.12,13 It also points to the importance of measurements of the levels of O2 in particular tissues in vivo. In warm-blooded organisms in vivo, such levels are critically dependent on multiple factors including vascularization and angiogenesis, levels of red blood cells and hemoglobin, cardiac capacity, as well as external oxygenation. These considerations are also critical for the interpretation of studies of “hypoxia” in cell lines that were derived in hyperoxic conditions, but later exposed to lower O2 levels.
In this regard, it is critical to emphasize two concepts that provide an outline for the sections to follow: (1) few tissues experience atmospheric levels of O2 in vivo and (2) metazoan life originated in an atmosphere considerably lower in levels of O2 than the modern atmosphere.
Cell Culture Conditions and O2 Levels
For over a decade it has been recognized that proliferation is enhanced and differentiation is altered in a number of stem cell types when cells are cultured in levels of O2 (1–8% O2) lower than those in air, previously the standard for in vitro studies (reviewed in refs. 12 and 13). Cells from the nervous system cultured under such low O2 conditions include neural progenitor cells from various brain regions,14-28 virally-immortalized human neural progenitor cells,29 and neural crest stem cells.24 Other sensitive cells are iPS cells,30 embryonic stem cells22,27,31 and stem cells of different tissues.32 These observations are consistent with what is known about O2 levels in the stem cell niches of the brain and other tissues12,13,16,32-37 and are likely to reflect more closely the native behavior of cells under physiological conditions.
A recent well-received book describes the origins of the now ubiquitous human HeLa cell line.38 The author reviews the early history of cell culture, noting that the recovery of stable human cell lines was rare, an observation accounting for the extensive use of the surviving line HeLa. Indeed it is possible that many early cell cultures failed because they were grown in air, a hyperoxic environment compared with their in vivo environment. This consideration highlights the importance of taking in vivo physiological O2 tension into account when designing in vitro culture conditions.
Changes in the Expression of Multiple Types of Adhesion Molecules Accompany the Growth of Neural Stem Cells in Reduced O2 Atmospheres In Vitro
Cell adhesion between and among cells is a critical component of morphoregulation during development and in disease.39,40 Molecules of the immunoglobulin and cadherin families of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) link cells together and collectively play major roles in the formation of tissues and organs. In addition, molecules in the extracellular matrix (ECM) surrounding cells, along with integrins and other ECM receptors on the cell surface, are critical for cell migration.
Several recent studies have linked the altered expression of cell and extracellular matrix adhesion molecules and matrix modifying enzymes to growth of neural stem cells in culture in a reduced O2 environment.23,41 Moreover, studies from my laboratory found that the levels of mRNAs for several CAMs, ECM proteins, and ECM modifying enzymes differed in rat embryonic neural stem cells cultured for 72 h in 1% vs. 20% O2.23 Another study evaluated 5704 genes in rat neural stem cells and found that, of all the genes whose expression differed between cells cultured at 3% or 20% O2 for 24 h, a significant fraction were involved in cell adhesion or migration.41
Adhesion molecule expression in vitro was also altered in several other cell types exposed to reduced O2 levels, including mesenchymal stem cells,42-44 hematopoietic stem cells45 and a melanoma cell line.44
Connection between Oxygen Levels, HIF1α, Wnt Signaling and Adhesion Molecule Expression Suggests One Mechanism to Control Neural Stem Cell Proliferation
A significant finding in two recent papers is the connection between HIF1α stabilization and the activation of the Wnt pathway by lowered O2.22,23 As reported in many systems, activation of HIF-1α occurred in rat embryonic neural stem cells cultured in lowered O2.22,23 As described above, stabilization of the levels of the HIF1α protein is a hallmark of hypoxia,2,12,13,46,47 but HIF1α levels are also known to vary significantly under different physiological levels of O2.8
Our study23 also showed that a critical downstream target of Wnt was an increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), an ECM modifying enzyme. MMP9 expression had previously been shown to be upregulated by Wnt activation in human lymphocytes.48 More importantly, we showed that the increase in the level and activity of MMP9 was essential for the increased proliferation and migration of embryonic rat neural stem cells at reduced levels of O2.23 Hence modifications to the ECM can control neural stem cell proliferation in vitro and may do so in vivo in the stem cell niche. Evaluating the proliferation and migration of neural stem cells in the MMP9 knockout mouse will be revealing and an assessment of the critical enzyme targets of MMP9 should be facilitated using this model.
Wnt is a critical regulator of cell adhesion in multiple cell types via its ability to alter β-catenin activity, the so-called canonical Wnt signaling pathway.49-51 Canonical Wnt signaling primarily influences cadherin-mediated adhesion, subcellular localization, and effects on cell junctions.52-56 The non-canonical, planar cell polarity Wnt pathway57 involves cell rearrangements and migration during development, particularly those in the nervous system.58 These pathways involve extensive changes in cell adhesion and in the cytoskeleton.57
Another mechanism by which O2 levels could affect adhesion systems is via the engagement of microRNAs, many of which target various adhesion molecule mRNAs and are known to change dramatically under hypoxic conditions.59-65 Thus O2 influences Wnt activity via HIF1α activation, and Wnt in turn can influence multiple adhesive systems directly or indirectly. Such adhesive interactions are clearly a substrate for the evolution of multicellular organisms over geological time.57,66,67
Hypoxia in Early Embryonic Development
Studies of mammalian placental development were among the first to recognize the importance of O2 tension for proper development, both of the early placenta and later of the first trimester human embryo, prior to the complete establishment of maternal-fetal circulation.68-70 The hypoxic environment in utero has been postulated to play a key role in trophoblast proliferation and invasion, in both in vivo and in vitro studies.68,70 In this system, low O2 promotes the expression of several extracellular matrix adhesion molecules, such as those of the β1 integrin family as well as matrix modifying enzymes such as uPA and MMP-2, which play essential roles in trophoblast invasion (reviewed in ref. 68) This process is an essential initial mechanism for formation of the placenta, and aberrations in these early events can have serious consequences for placental function resulting in adverse pregnancy outcomes.69,70
Influence of Hypoxia-Ischemia on Adhesion Molecule Expression in the Fetal and Adult Brain
Hypoxia in utero is a key factor contributing to impaired neural development. In a mouse model of fetal hypoxia, neuronal migration was increased in the CA1 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus along with biphasic changes in molecules that influence migration, including reelin, disabled and APP.71 Using the hypoxia indicator pimonidazole, it was revealed that hypoxic areas colocalized with HIF1α expression and with the adhesion molecule PE-CAM, a marker of endothelial cells, indicating that hypoxia promotes the proliferation and migration of these cells to stimulate angiogenesis during brain development.72
Studies of cerebral hypoxia in adult animals induced either by middle cerebral artery occlusion (stroke model) or by hypobaric O2 exposure (chronic hypoxia) demonstrated changes in multiple adhesion systems. For example, in microvessel-rich regions isolated from stroke-affected human brains by laser-capture microdissection, proangiogenic adhesion molecules were upregulated, including NR-CAM, MMP-2, TIMP-1 and β-catenin.73 In a mouse stroke model, V-CAM, laminin, dystroglycan and α6 integrin were upregulated and the number of proliferative endothelial cells were increased suggesting that these molecules contribute to angiogenesis in response to cerebral ischemia.74 In chronic cerebral ischemia, fibronectin was increased as was the expression of integrin α5β1 on endothelial cells.75 Subsequently, changes in astrocytes occurred, including increases in α6β4 integrin and dystroclycan, presumably contributing to the cell interactions necessary for the formation of astrocytic end feet to support the restoration of a mature brain endothelium.75 It is known that cerebral edema occurs after a hypoxic incident due to a compromised blood-brain barrier and the resultant increase in cerebrovascular permeability. In an in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier subjected to hypoxia, levels of expression of the E-cadherin adhesion molecule were decreased; this molecule is known to be important for blood-brain barrier function.76
Adhesion Molecule Expression in Neural Stem Cells Favors Their Incorporation into Regenerating Tissues after Various Lesions to the CNS
Early studies revealed that the polysialylated form of N-CAM (PSA-N-CAM) was prominently expressed in neural stem cells migrating in the rostral migratory stream from the SVZ to the olfactory bulb.77 Subsequent studies showed that loss of PSA or N-CAM decreased the normal migration of these cells78,79 and allowed their increased migration into demyelinating lesions80,81 or facilitated myelination when transplanted into lesioned spinal cord.82 A recent study indicates that increased expression of reelin helps to facilitate migration of cells from the rostral migratory stream into demyelinating lesions in the corpus callosum.83
Other studies have indicated that overexpression of the L1 neural cell adhesion molecule in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells supported the regrowth of corticospinal axons and promoted functional recovery after spinal cord compression injury.84,85 The same L1-ES cells promoted recovery from excitotoxic lesions to the mouse striatum.86 Expression of the extracellular matrix proteins thrombospondin 1 and 2 were correlated with a positive recovery of neuronal function after transient ischemia.87
An interesting study relevant to the use of stem cells to promote recovery after stroke used cells selected for adhesion molecule expression.88 Mouse neural stem cells were selected for expression of the integrin CD49d, which is a receptor for V-CAM in endothelial cells. These selected cells showed enhanced homing toward a hypoxic lesion and enhanced behavioral recovery in a mouse stroke model. The authors postulate that these effects are due to better transmigration through the vascular endothelium.
All of the foregoing perturbations to stem cells and their environments should be of great value for studies aimed at promoting regeneration by mimicking the mechanical forces that bias stem cell fate.89 Alterations of adhesion molecule expression in the endothelial environment, in addition to influencing tumor vascularization and O2 delivery, can serve to generate signals for neighboring neural stem cells to proliferate and differentiate.90,91
Hypoxia and the Adhesive Glioma Cell Microenvironment
Glioma cells bear many striking resemblances to neural stem cells.92-95 These tumors are thought to arise when neural stem cells at specific stages of development either undergo mutation or respond to environmental signals and become immortalized. Like all solid tumors, gliomas show large areas of hypoxia and it has been suggested that hypoxia favors the proliferation and stabilization of cancer stem cells, which can maintain tumor propagation13,85,93,94,96,97 In glioma cells, the effects of “hypoxia,” or low O2 in situ, are similar to that of a low O2 niche in normal neural stem cells.12,13
HIFs are commonly expressed in gliomas and HIF1 blockade inhibited migration and invasion of malignant glioma.92 At least in part of the decreased migration was due to the downregulation of MMPs 2 and 9. MMP-13 is expressed specifically in glioma stem cells and its inhibition also results in decreased glioma stem cell migration and invasion.98 It has also been postulated that hypoxia increases the strength of cell-cell adhesion in glioma cells in culture.99
Glioma stem cells have been shown to express the L1-CAM, which is implicated in increased invasiveness and metastasis.98,100 Expression of this adhesion molecule is correlated with poor outcome in patients.100 In vitro, decreasing the levels of L1 inhibited cell growth and neurosphere formation and decreased apoptosis.98 The Wnt signaling pathway, many downstream targets of which are adhesion molecules,53-55 has recently been shown to influence glioma tumorigenesis.101
It is well established that the turnover of cell and matrix adhesions is essential to allow for epithelial mesenchymal transformation and support tumor migration and invasion into surrounding tissues.85,93,97,102 Targeting of these molecules has provided several avenues for developmental therapeutics,93,95,97,98 although the similarities between glioma cells and neural stem cells present difficulties in identifying targeted therapeutics that do not affect endogenous normal cells.93,95,97,98
HIFs and Hypoxia at the Organismal Level
Genetic variations in HIFs have been seen in human and animal populations dwelling at high altitudes,103-108 in Drosophila that have been adapted to low O2 levels109,110 and in blind mole rats that live in hypoxic underground burrows.111,112 Thus modern organisms have adapted and are capable of adapting to alterations in the O2 environment via HIF1 changes and alterations in genes involved in aerobic metabolism. It is not surprising that HIF mutations and HIF dysregulation are associated with multiple diseasese.171 As outlined in the final sections, it is tempting to speculate that cell adhesion events influenced by increasing O2 levels in the early earth atmosphere provided the critical control of cell and/or substrate adhesion that favored the emergence of multicellularity during evolutionary time.
Organismal Evolution Occurred at Vastly Lower O2 Levels than Those in the Present Atmosphere
Biologists think about molecular, cellular and organismal evolution, but we seldom consider them in light of geologic and atmospheric change. Integration of this key element in the evolution of life on earth could encourage new ways of thinking about molecular and organismal evolution. Many of us were not trained in earth and atmospheric sciences or even cognizant that such issues might play a key role in the development of life on earth, notwithstanding perhaps metabolic biochemists, who necessarily think about aerobic and anaerobic cellular energy production (e.g., refs. 5, 113 and 114). Indeed this point serves as a reminder that mitochondria, the key players in aerobic metabolism, are central to many aspects of development and evolution (see below). The evolution of metabolic processes114,115 played a critical role and continues to do so, especially in high energy-requiring tissues such as the nervous, cardiac, and muscular systems.
When unicellular organisms first appeared on earth, more than three billion years ago,116 the Earth's atmosphere and oceans were anoxic (see Fig. 1).117 Around 2.5–3 billion years ago, photosynthesizing cyanobacteria evolved and began producing O2, which initially was absorbed by minerals but, exhausting this sink, eventually accumulated in the atmosphere, resulting in the Great Oxygenation Event.117 This event is believed to have caused the extinction of a large number of organisms that were poisoned by toxic O2 levels.116 Eukaryotes and archaebacteria appeared about two billion years ago during the Neoproterozoic period as O2 levels were rising, albeit still considerably lower than modern levels.117,118 Multicellular life probably arose 1–1.5 billion years ago and bilaterian animals were prevalent 500 million years ago just before the Cambrian explosion.116,119
Figure 1. Key events in biological evolution superimposed on the range of oxygen levels in the earth's atmosphere. The figure was modified from reference 117 with the author's permission. More recent data indicate a transient rise in levels (of 0.04–0.1 pO2) between 2.0 and 2.4 billion years before the present.160 The biological evolutionary times are compiled from several references and citations within.116,117,170 The geological times have wide variances and change as new data and models accumulate.
These topics are complex and have been given short shrift by my exclusive focus on O2 levels. For example, a recent study indicated that as late as the Devonian era, O2 levels were lower than the present and impacted the emergence of larger vertebrates with high metabolic rates, e.g., predatory fish.119 Ocean oxygenation appears to have acted (and appears to be doing so still) as an “evolutionary barrier” to the increasing size of predatory fish.119,120 In a similar vein, a recent paper postulates that variations in O2 levels acted to select among arthropods during the Cambrian ages, with the most successful species being those that were tolerant of, and had the ability to respond adaptively to, changes in O2 levels in seawater.121 Consideration of O2 levels as drivers of evolution is still being intensely debated in studies of both modern evolution and marine ecology, increasingly so as ongoing data emerge from measurements of O2 levels both in geological samples117-119,122 and in regions of present-day oceans that have become hypoxic due to the influences of climate change.123
Phylogeny of Some Oxygen Binding and Sensing Molecules
It is of interest that homologs of the globins, molecules that bind O2 via heme coordination, are found in modern prokaryotes.124-128 Perhaps such O2-carrying proteins evolved to capture the very small amounts of molecular O2 generated in early cellular life to be used for critical oxidation reactions such as tyrosine synthesis, hydroxylation of amino acids, and, in eukaryotes, sterol biosynthesis129 and the hydroxylation of HIF1α.2 Yet a scan of the current GenBank database indicates that the hypoxia responsive protein, HIF1α, is found only in eukaryotes. Homologs of the von Hippel-Lindau protein, which controls HIF degradation,3,4,118 are found in Volvox.130 Volvox is a spherical, sponge-like member of the green algae with a small number of specialized cell types, including germ cells.67,131 Of all extant organisms, Volvox is thought to be the best model system for understanding the emergence of the earliest multicellular organisms as they evolved from unicellular ancestors.67,131
Adhesion Molecules, Oxygen Levels, Prokaryotic Symbiosis and Multicellularity
The last universal common ancestor for all extant life was a prokaryote that had ribosomes and a plethora of redox proteins, but no organelles such as chloroplasts or mitochondria.132-136 The appearance of modern cellular organelles, including mitochondria and chloroplasts, and possibly cilia and flagella, almost certainly came about as a result of the symbiotic fusion of individual free-living unicellular organisms early in cellular evolution.137-139 Although famously championed by Lynn Margulis,137 these ideas were suggested earlier by several authors.115 Creation of such symbionts would likely be facilitated by adhesive mechanisms between cells. Support for an adhesive mechanism for symbiosis has been strengthened by the description of “predatory prokaryotes.”140 These bacteria adhere to the surfaces of other bacteria allowing their entry into the host cell. Clearly molecular mechanisms for adhesivity, possibly driven by the induction of gene expression by increasing O2 during evolutionary time, might have facilitated such interactions.
Notably many transcription factors, in addition to HIF1α, are known to be sensitive to cellular redox state (which is influenced by, but not restricted to, alterations in O2 availability).141-144 Targets of these factors would increase the number of molecular changes that might increase in responsiveness to altered O2 concentrations in addition to the changes in adhesion molecules emphasized here.
The appearance of multicellularity also necessitated a mechanism for cell-to-cell and cell-to-substrate adhesion, which arose by diverse pathways in various lineages.66,67 As noted above, the volvocine algae are the extant organisms thought to most closely resemble the earliest multicellular organisms in evolution.67 Volvox has a cell adhesion molecule homologous to fasciclin I in Drosophila145 as well as a sulfated glycoprotein that appears at a distinct phase of embryogenesis when it might facilitate cell interactions,146,147 such as those that form cytoplasmic bridges in the Volvox embryo.148 A large number of extracellular matrix molecules in Volvox has been described biochemically149,150 and genomically.130 Several distinct types of ECM zones have been observed ultrastructurally.149 Moreover, ECM assembly has been shown to be inhibited by sulfhydryl reagents,151 indicating sensitivity to the local redox environment. Thus molecules for cell and extracellular matrix adhesion exist and certainly play a critical role in this primitive multicellular organism.57,66,67
Other organisms have been used in modern studies to mimic processes that supported the emergence of multicellularity. One is D. discoideum, a single-cell amoeboid organism that forms aggregates and subsequent fruiting bodies upon starvation. The process of aggregation is guided by the differential distribution of several cell and extracellular adhesion molecules.152-155 The genome of D. discoideum contains homologs to several families of adhesive proteins.156 Indeed, the formation of epithelial structures during morphogenesis requires homologs of both α- and β-catenin, suggesting that these junctional and signaling proteins predated the appearance of metazoans.157 In the case of multicellular colony formation in the single cell choanoflagellate, S. rosetta, colonies formed through cell division and not by the aggregation of individual cells.158 Nevertheless, in both model organisms and the evolution of multicellularity, post-division adhesive mechanisms must have been operative to hold cells together, whether by direct cell adhesion or encasement within a common extracellular matrix, similar to what occurs in Volvox. A recent study that selected for aggregates in S. cerevisiae over several generations demonstrated that multicellularity could occur rapidly and provided another example of post-division colony formation.159 Any of these model systems could be amenable to test whether exposure to O2 levels comparable to those that occurred during the emergence of multicellular organisms influences the expression of any of the known adhesion molecules in the respective systems. Such experiments would also be a good test of the extent of generality in the evolution of cell adhesion mechanisms.66,153
While it is not novel to suggest that various kinds of adhesion events were necessary for the emergence of multicellularity,57,66,67 the recent studies described here raise the intriguing possibility that the increasing (and at times decreasing)117,160 O2 levels over evolutionary time might have exerted a strong selective influence on the evolution and production of adhesion molecule precursors.
Summary and Additional Considerations
Low atmospheric O2 concentrations, at levels that are now commonly referred to as “hypoxia,” were the norm during the evolution of multicellular organisms. It is possible that alterations in O2 levels drove the emergence and expression of molecules that supported adhesion thus facilitating prokaryotic symbiosis and multicellularity. HIF1 and its hydroxylating (PHD-family) enzymes probably did not evolve to deal with “hypoxia” but more likely acted as O2 sensors (as has been suggested for PHD2,161) in order to regulate the response of suites of genes to the local and atmospheric O2 environment over evolutionary time.47,162,163 Consideration of the evolutionary origins of O2-responsive molecular mechanisms might greatly broaden our understanding of how such molecules function in development, especially in stem cell niches. For example, particular levels of O2 could select for suites of adhesion molecules that would select among and guide the processes of cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. For example, altered adhesive mechanisms brought about by differing O2 levels may occur when stem cells leave the proliferative niche and migrate and differentiate in adjacent tissues. Such an idea is consistent with the observation that neural stem cells proliferate (and possibly switch between activity and quiescence) in the lowest O2 levels (reviewed in refs. 12 and 13) and that increased O2 levels support stem cell differentiation into particular lineages.13
In addition to understanding diseases and development of the central nervous system,13,164 these issues are also useful in considering the consequences of hypoxia in tissues and the progression of diseases in which cellular niches low in O2 are thought to influence cell behavior, particularly cancer165-168 and other diseases of proliferative misregulation, such as inflammation, fibrosis and sclerosis.169
Acknowledgments
I thank Drs Gerald Edelman, David Edelman, Vincent Mauro, Joseph Gally and Bruce Cunningham for helpful discussions and for their critical reading of the manuscript. I also thank Dr Sigeng Chen for introducing me to the topic of changes in oxygen levels during geologic evolution. Thanks to Dr David Edelman for figure preparation. Work in the author's laboratory is supported by the Scripps Research Institute Department of Neurobiology, the Mathers Foundation and Promosome, L.L.P. There are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/celladhesion/article/19582
References
- 1.Lendahl U, Lee KL, Yang H, Poellinger L. Generating specificity and diversity in the transcriptional response to hypoxia. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:821–32. doi: 10.1038/nrg2665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kaelin WG, Jr., Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;30:393–402. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaelin WG., Jr The von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor protein: O2 sensing and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:865–73. doi: 10.1038/nrc2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Majmundar AJ, Wong WJ, Simon MC. Hypoxia-inducible factors and the response to hypoxic stress. Mol Cell. 2010;40:294–309. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Webster KA. Evolution of the coordinate regulation of glycolytic enzyme genes by hypoxia. J Exp Biol. 2003;206:2911–22. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Papandreou I, Cairns RA, Fontana L, Lim AL, Denko NC. HIF-1 mediates adaptation to hypoxia by actively downregulating mitochondrial oxygen consumption. Cell Metab. 2006;3:187–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mazumdar J, Dondeti V, Simon MC. Hypoxia-inducible factors in stem cells and cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:4319–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00963.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jiang BH, Semenza GL, Bauer C, Marti HH. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 levels vary exponentially over a physiologically relevant range of O2 tension. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:C1172–80. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.4.C1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spellman PT, Sherlock G, Zhang MQ, Iyer VR, Anders K, Eisen MB, et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:3273–97. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.12.3273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Morriss GM, New DA. Effect of oxygen concentration on morphogenesis of cranial neural folds and neural crest in cultured rat embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1979;54:17–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ivanovic Z. Hypoxia or in situ normoxia: The stem cell paradigm. J Cell Physiol. 2009;219:271–5. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Simon MC, Keith B. The role of oxygen availability in embryonic development and stem cell function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:285–96. doi: 10.1038/nrm2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Panchision DM. The role of oxygen in regulating neural stem cells in development and disease. J Cell Physiol. 2009;220:562–8. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Studer L, Csete M, Lee SH, Kabbani N, Walikonis J, Wold B, et al. Enhanced proliferation, survival, and dopaminergic differentiation of CNS precursors in lowered oxygen. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7377–83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-19-07377.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tsatmali M, Walcott EC, Crossin KL. Newborn neurons acquire high levels of reactive oxygen species and increased mitochondrial proteins upon differentiation from progenitors. Brain Res. 2005;1040:137–50. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.01.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen HL, Pistollato F, Hoeppner DJ, Ni HT, McKay RD, Panchision DM. Oxygen tension regulates survival and fate of mouse central nervous system precursors at multiple levels. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2291–301. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Milosevic J, Adler I, Manaenko A, Schwarz SC, Walkinshaw G, Arend M, et al. Non-hypoxic stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor alpha (HIF-alpha): relevance in neural progenitor/stem cells. Neurotox Res. 2009;15:367–80. doi: 10.1007/s12640-009-9043-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhou L, Miller CA. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, oxygen sensors and hypoxic induction of neurogenesis. Neurodegener Dis. 2006;3:50–5. doi: 10.1159/000092093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pistollato F, Chen HL, Schwartz PH, Basso G, Panchision DM. Oxygen tension controls the expansion of human CNS precursors and the generation of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2007;35:424–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horie N, So K, Moriya T, Kitagawa N, Tsutsumi K, Nagata I, et al. Effects of oxygen concentration on the proliferation and differentiation of mouse neural stem cells in vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2008;28:833–45. doi: 10.1007/s10571-007-9237-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhao T, Zhang CP, Liu ZH, Wu LY, Huang X, Wu HT, et al. Hypoxia-driven proliferation of embryonic neural stem/progenitor cells--role of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1alpha. FEBS J. 2008;275:1824–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06340.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mazumdar J, O’Brien WT, Johnson RS, LaManna JC, Chavez JC, Klein PS, et al. O2 regulates stem cells through Wnt/β-catenin signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:1007–13. doi: 10.1038/ncb2102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ingraham CA, Park GC, Makarenkova HP, Crossin KL. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 induced by Wnt signaling increases the proliferation and migration of embryonic neural stem cells at low O2 levels. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:17649–57. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.229427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Morrison SJ, Csete M, Groves AK, Melega W, Wold B, Anderson DJ. Culture in reduced levels of oxygen promotes clonogenic sympathoadrenal differentiation by isolated neural crest stem cells. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7370–6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-19-07370.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang CP, Zhu LL, Zhao T, Zhao H, Huang X, Ma X, et al. Characteristics of neural stem cells expanded in lowered oxygen and the potential role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1Alpha. Neurosignals. 2006-2007;15:259–65. doi: 10.1159/000103385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Krabbe C, Courtois E, Jensen P, Jørgensen JR, Zimmer J, Marti´nez-Serrano A, et al. Enhanced dopaminergic differentiation of human neural stem cells by synergistic effect of Bcl-xL and reduced oxygen tension. J Neurochem. 2009;110:1908–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Millman JR, Tan JH, Colton CK. The effects of low oxygen on self-renewal and differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009;14:694–700. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283329d53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harms KM, Li L, Cunningham LA. Murine neural stem/progenitor cells protect neurons against ischemia by HIF-1alpha-regulated VEGF signaling. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Santilli G, Lamorte G, Carlessi L, Ferrari D, Rota Nodari L, Binda E, et al. Mild hypoxia enhances proliferation and multipotency of human neural stem cells. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yoshida Y, Takahashi K, Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Hypoxia enhances the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:237–41. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clarke L, van der Kooy D. Low oxygen enhances primitive and definitive neural stem cell colony formation by inhibiting distinct cell death pathways. Stem Cells. 2009;27:1879–86. doi: 10.1002/stem.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lin Q, Kim Y, Alarcon RM, Yun Z. Oxygen and Cell Fate Decisions. Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2008;2:43–51. doi: 10.4137/grsb.s434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dirken MN, Heemstra H. Alveolar oxygen tension and lung circulation. Q J Exp Physiol. 1948;34:193–211. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1948.sp000929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Horng CT, Liu CC, Wu DM, Wu YC, Chen JT, Chang CJ, et al. Visual fields during acute exposure to a simulated altitude of 7620 m. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2008;79:666–9. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.2160.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Erecińska M, Silver IA. Tissue oxygen tension and brain sensitivity to hypoxia. Respir Physiol. 2001;128:263–76. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00306-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hoffman CE, Clark RT, Jr., Brown EB., Jr Blood oxygen saturations and duration of consciousness in anoxia at high altitudes. Am J Physiol. 1946;145:685–92. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1946.145.5.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vieira HL, Alves PM, Vercelli A. Modulation of neuronal stem cell differentiation by hypoxia and reactive oxygen species. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;93:444–55. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Skloot R. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Crown, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Crossin KL. Cell adhesion molecules in embryogenesis and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;615:172–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb37759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Edelman GM, Crossin KL. Cell adhesion molecules: implications for a molecular histology. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:155–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.001103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhu LL, Zhao T, huang X, Liu ZH, Wu LY, Wu KW, et al. Gene expression profiles and metabolic changes in embryonic neural progenitor cells under low oxygen. Cell Reprogram. 2011;13:113–20. doi: 10.1089/cell.2010.0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Song SW, Chang W, Song BW, Song H, Lim S, Kim HJ, et al. Integrin-linked kinase is required in hypoxic mesenchymal stem cells for strengthening cell adhesion to ischemic myocardium. Stem Cells. 2009;27:1358–65. doi: 10.1002/stem.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grayson WL, Zhao F, Bunnell B, Ma T. Hypoxia enhances proliferation and tissue formation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;358:948–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cowden Dahl KD, Robertson SE, Weaver VM, Simon MC. Hypoxia-inducible factor regulates alphavbeta3 integrin cell surface expression. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1901–12. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-12-1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lekli I, Gurusamy N, Ray D, Tosaki A, Das DK. Redox regulation of stem cell mobilization. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;87:989–95. doi: 10.1139/Y09-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mohyeldin A, Garzón-Muvdi T, Quiñones-Hinojosa A. Oxygen in stem cell biology: a critical component of the stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:150–61. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Harrison JF, Haddad GG. Effects of oxygen on growth and size: synthesis of molecular, organismal, and evolutionary studies with Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:95–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wu B, Crampton SP, Hughes CC. Wnt signaling induces matrix metalloproteinase expression and regulates T cell transmigration. Immunity. 2007;26:227–39. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Barker N. The canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;468:5–15. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-249-6_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nelson WJ, Nusse R. Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science. 2004;303:1483–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1094291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jones FS, Jing J, Stonehouse AH, Stevens A, Edelman GM. Caffeine stimulates cytochrome oxidase expression and activity in the striatum in a sexually dimorphic manner. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74:673–84. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.046888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Eisenmann DM. Wnt signaling. WormBook. 2005:1–17. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.7.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cadigan KM, Peifer M. Wnt signaling from development to disease: insights from model systems. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1:a002881. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Heuberger J, Birchmeier W. Interplay of cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and canonical Wnt signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a002915. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sylvie J, Ellen C, Kris V. The role of Wnt in cell signaling and cell adhesion during early vertebrate development. Front Biosci. 2012;17:2352–66. doi: 10.2741/3858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wu KJ, Yang MH. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stemness: the Twist1-Bmi1 connection. Biosci Rep. 2011;31:449–55. doi: 10.1042/BSR20100114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Saburi S, McNeill H. Organising cells into tissues: new roles for cell adhesion molecules in planar cell polarity. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:482–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wada H, Okamoto H. Roles of noncanonical Wnt/PCP pathway genes in neuronal migration and neurulation in zebrafish. Zebrafish. 2009;6:3–8. doi: 10.1089/zeb.2008.0557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Devlin C, Greco S, Martelli F, Ivan M. miR-210: More than a silent player in hypoxia. IUBMB Life. 2011;63:94–100. doi: 10.1002/iub.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Huang S, He X. microRNAs: tiny RNA molecules, huge driving forces to move the cell. Protein Cell. 2010;1:916–26. doi: 10.1007/s13238-010-0116-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.McCormick R, Buffa FM, Ragoussis J, Harris AL. The role of hypoxia regulated microRNAs in cancer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;345:47–70. doi: 10.1007/82_2010_76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Crosby ME, Devlin CM, Glazer PM, Calin GA, Ivan M. Emerging roles of microRNAs in the molecular responses to hypoxia. Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15:3861–6. doi: 10.2174/138161209789649367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Dalmay T, Edwards DR. MicroRNAs and the hallmarks of cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:6170–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pocock R. Invited review: decoding the microRNA response to hypoxia. Pflugers Arch. 2011;461:307–15. doi: 10.1007/s00424-010-0910-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schliekelman MJ, Gibbons DL, Faca VM, Creighton CJ, Rizvi ZH, Zhang Q, et al. Targets of the tumor suppressor miR-200 in regulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:7670–82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Abedin M, King N. Diverse evolutionary paths to cell adhesion. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:734–42. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kirk DL. A twelve-step program for evolving multicellularity and a division of labor. Bioessays. 2005;27:299–310. doi: 10.1002/bies.20197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.James JL, Stone PR, Chamley LW. The regulation of trophoblast differentiation by oxygen in the first trimester of pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:137–44. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pringle KG, Kind KL, Sferruzzi-Perri AN, Thompson JG, Roberts CT. Beyond oxygen: complex regulation and activity of hypoxia inducible factors in pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:415–31. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tuuli MG, Longtine MS, Nelson DM. Review: Oxygen and trophoblast biology--a source of controversy. Placenta. 2011;32(Suppl 2):S109–18. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Golan MH, Mane R, Molczadzki G, Zuckerman M, Kaplan-Louson V, Huleihel M, et al. Impaired migration signaling in the hippocampus following prenatal hypoxia. Neuropharmacology. 2009;57:511–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lee YM, Jeong CH, Koo SY, Son MJ, Song HS, Bae SK, et al. Determination of hypoxic region by hypoxia marker in developing mouse embryos in vivo: a possible signal for vessel development. Dev Dyn. 2001;220:175–86. doi: 10.1002/1097-0177(20010201)220:2<175::AID-DVDY1101>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Slevin M, Krupinski J, Rovira N, Turu M, Luque A, Baldellou M, et al. Identification of pro-angiogenic markers in blood vessels from stroked-affected brain tissue using laser-capture microdissection. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Li L, Liu F, Welser-Alves JV, McCullough LD, Milner R. Upregulation of fibronectin and the alpha5beta1 and alphavbeta3 integrins on blood vessels within the cerebral ischemic penumbra. Exp Neurol. 2012;233:283–91. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Li L, Welser JV, Dore-Duffy P, del Zoppo GJ, Lamanna JC, Milner R. In the hypoxic central nervous system, endothelial cell proliferation is followed by astrocyte activation, proliferation, and increased expression of the alpha 6 beta 4 integrin and dystroglycan. Glia. 2010;58:1157–67. doi: 10.1002/glia.20995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Abbruscato TJ, Davis TP. Protein expression of brain endothelial cell E-cadherin after hypoxia/aglycemia: influence of astrocyte contact. Brain Res. 1999;842:277–86. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01778-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Doetsch F, Caille´ I, Lim DA, Garci´a-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A. Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain. Cell. 1999;97:703–16. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80783-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cremer H, Lange R, Christoph A, Plomann M, Vopper G, Roes J, et al. Inactivation of the N-CAM gene in mice results in size reduction of the olfactory bulb and deficits in spatial learning. Nature. 1994;367:455–9. doi: 10.1038/367455a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ono K, Tomasiewicz H, Magnuson T, Rutishauser U. N-CAM mutation inhibits tangential neuronal migration and is phenocopied by enzymatic removal of polysialic acid. Neuron. 1994;13:595–609. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nait-Oumesmar B, Decker L, Lachapelle F, Avellana-Adalid V, Bachelin C, Van Evercooren AB. Progenitor cells of the adult mouse subventricular zone proliferate, migrate and differentiate into oligodendrocytes after demyelination. Eur J Neurosci. 1999;11:4357–66. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00873.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Decker L, Durbec P, Rougon G, Evercooren AB. Loss of polysialic residues accelerates CNS neural precursor differentiation in pathological conditions. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;19:225–38. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2001.1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Keirstead HS, Ben-Hur T, Rogister B, O’Leary MT, Dubois-Dalcq M, Blakemore WF. Polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule-positive CNS precursors generate both oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells to remyelinate the CNS after transplantation. J Neurosci. 1999;19:7529–36. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-17-07529.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Courtès S, Vernerey J, Pujadas L, Magalon K, Cremer H, Soriano E, et al. Reelin controls progenitor cell migration in the healthy and pathological adult mouse brain. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Chen J, Bernreuther C, Dihne´ M, Schachner M. Cell adhesion molecule l1-transfected embryonic stem cells with enhanced survival support regrowth of corticospinal tract axons in mice after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:896–906. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cui YF, Xu JC, Hargus G, Jakovcevski I, Schachner M, Bernreuther C. Embryonic stem cell-derived L1 overexpressing neural aggregates enhance recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bernreuther C, Dihne´ M, Johann V, Schiefer J, Cui Y, Hargus G, et al. Neural cell adhesion molecule L1-transfected embryonic stem cells promote functional recovery after excitotoxic lesion of the mouse striatum. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11532–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2688-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Liauw J, Hoang S, Choi M, Eroglu C, Choi M, Sun GH, et al. Thrombospondins 1 and 2 are necessary for synaptic plasticity and functional recovery after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:1722–32. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Guzman R, De Los Angeles A, Cheshier S, Choi R, Hoang S, Liauw J, et al. Intracarotid injection of fluorescence activated cell-sorted CD49d-positive neural stem cells improves targeted cell delivery and behavior after stroke in a mouse stroke model. Stroke. 2008;39:1300–6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.500470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Li D, Zhou J, Chowdhury F, Cheng J, Wang N, Wang F. Role of mechanical factors in fate decisions of stem cells. Regen Med. 2011;6:229–40. doi: 10.2217/rme.11.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Doetsch F. A niche for adult neural stem cells. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003;13:543–50. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2003.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Shen Q, Goderie SK, Jin L, Karanth N, Sun Y, Abramova N, et al. Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science. 2004;304:1338–40. doi: 10.1126/science.1095505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Barami K. Relationship of neural stem cells with their vascular niche: implications in the malignant progression of gliomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15:1193–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Huang Z, Cheng L, Guryanova OA, Wu Q, Bao S. Cancer stem cells in glioblastoma--molecular signaling and therapeutic targeting. Protein Cell. 2010;1:638–55. doi: 10.1007/s13238-010-0078-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bar EE. Glioblastoma, cancer stem cells and hypoxia. Brain Pathol. 2011;21:119–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2010.00460.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Westphal M, Lamszus K. The neurobiology of gliomas: from cell biology to the development of therapeutic approaches. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:495–508. doi: 10.1038/nrn3060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wouters BG, Koritzinsky M. Hypoxia signalling through mTOR and the unfolded protein response in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:851–64. doi: 10.1038/nrc2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Bernhard EJ. Interventions that induce modifications in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Radiother. 2011;15:376–82. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Binello E, Germano IM. Targeting glioma stem cells: a novel framework for brain tumors. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1958–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02064.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Khain E, Katakowski M, Hopkins S, Szalad A, Zheng X, Jiang F, et al. Collective behavior of brain tumor cells: the role of hypoxia. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011;83:031920. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.031920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Siesser PF, Maness PF. L1 cell adhesion molecules as regulators of tumor cell invasiveness. Cell Adh Migr. 2009;3:275–7. doi: 10.4161/cam.3.3.8689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zhang N, Wei P, Gong A, Chiu WT, Lee HT, Colman H, et al. FoxM1 promotes β-catenin nuclear localization and controls Wnt target-gene expression and glioma tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:427–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Friedl P, Alexander S. Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: plasticity and reciprocity. Cell. 2011;147:992–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Li HG, Ren YM, Guo SC, Cheng L, Wang DP, Yang J, et al. The protein level of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha is increased in the plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) inhabiting high altitudes. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2009;311:134–41. doi: 10.1002/jez.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Yi X, Liang Y, Huerta-Sanchez E, Jin X, Cuo ZX, Pool JE, et al. Sequencing of 50 human exomes reveals adaptation to high altitude. Science. 2010;329:75–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1190371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Peng Y, Yang Z, Zhang H, Cui C, Qi X, Luo X, et al. Genetic variations in Tibetan populations and high-altitude adaptation at the Himalayas. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:1075–81. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Storz JF, Scott GR, Cheviron ZA. Phenotypic plasticity and genetic adaptation to high-altitude hypoxia in vertebrates. J Exp Biol. 2010;213:4125–36. doi: 10.1242/jeb.048181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bigham A, Bauchet M, Pinto D, Mao X, Akey JM, Mei R, et al. Identifying signatures of natural selection in Tibetan and Andean populations using dense genome scan data. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Simonson TS, Yang Y, Huff CD, Yun H, Qin G, Witherspoon DJ, et al. Genetic evidence for high-altitude adaptation in Tibet. Science. 2010;329:72–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1189406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zhou D, Xue J, Chen J, Morcillo P, Lambert JD, White KP, et al. Experimental selection for Drosophila survival in extremely low O(2) environment. PLoS One. 2007;2:e490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Zhou D, Visk DW, Haddad GG. Drosophila, a golden bug, for the dissection of the genetic basis of tolerance and susceptibility to hypoxia. Pediatr Res. 2009;66:239–47. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181b27275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Shams I, Avivi A, Nevo E. Hypoxic stress tolerance of the blind subterranean mole rat: expression of erythropoietin and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:9698–703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403540101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Shams I, Nevo E, Avivi A. Ontogenetic expression of erythropoietin and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha genes in subterranean blind mole rats. FASEB J. 2005;19:307–9. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2758fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: regulator of mitochondrial metabolism and mediator of ischemic preconditioning. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813:1263–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Raymond J, Segrè D. The effect of oxygen on biochemical networks and the evolution of complex life. Science. 2006;311:1764–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1118439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Broda E. The Evolution of the Bioenergetic Processes. Great Britain: Pergamon Press, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- 116.Cavalier-Smith T. Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361:969–1006. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Holland HD. The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361:903–15. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Johnston DT, Wolfe-Simon F, Pearson A, Knoll AH. Anoxygenic photosynthesis modulated Proterozoic oxygen and sustained Earth’s middle age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:16925–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909248106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Dahl TW, Hammarlund EU, Anbar AD, Bond DP, Gill BC, Gordon GW, et al. Devonian rise in atmospheric oxygen correlated to the radiations of terrestrial plants and large predatory fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:17911–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011287107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Dahl TW, Hammarlund EU. Do large predatory fish track ocean oxygenation? Commun Integr Biol. 2011;4:92–4. doi: 10.4161/cib.4.1.14119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Williams M, Vannier J, Corbari L, Massabuau JC. Oxygen as a driver of early arthropod micro-benthos evolution. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Saltzman MR, Young SA, Kump LR, Gill BC, Lyons TW, Runnegar B. Pulse of atmospheric oxygen during the late Cambrian. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:3876–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011836108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Deutsch C, Brix H, Ito T, Frenzel H, Thompson L. Climate-forced variability of ocean hypoxia. Science. 2011;333:336–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1202422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Hoffmann FG, Opazo JC, Storz JF. Differential loss and retention of cytoglobin, myoglobin, and globin-E during the radiation of vertebrates. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:588–600. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Nothnagel HJ, Winer BY, Vuletich DA, Pond MP, Lecomte JT. Structural properties of 2/2 hemoglobins: the group III protein from Helicobacter hepaticus. IUBMB Life. 2011;63:197–205. doi: 10.1002/iub.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Ascenzi P, Bolognesi M, Milani M, Guertin M, Visca P. Mycobacterial truncated hemoglobins: from genes to functions. Gene. 2007;398:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.02.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Freitas TA, Saito JA, Hou S, Alam M. Globin-coupled sensors, protoglobins, and the last universal common ancestor. J Inorg Biochem. 2005;99:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Vuletich DA, Lecomte JT. A phylogenetic and structural analysis of truncated hemoglobins. J Mol Evol. 2006;62:196–210. doi: 10.1007/s00239-005-0077-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Summons RE, Bradley AS, Jahnke LL, Waldbauer JR. Steroids, triterpenoids and molecular oxygen. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361:951–68. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Prochnik SE, Umen J, Nedelcu AM, Hallmann A, Miller SM, Nishii I, et al. Genomic analysis of organismal complexity in the multicellular green alga Volvox carteri. Science. 2010;329:223–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1188800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Herron MD, Hackett JD, Aylward FO, Michod RE. Triassic origin and early radiation of multicellular volvocine algae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3254–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811205106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Forterre P, Philippe H. The last universal common ancestor (LUCA), simple or complex? Biol Bull. 1999;196:373–5, discussion 375-7. doi: 10.2307/1542973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Doolittle WF. Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science. 1999;284:2124–9. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5423.2124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Cavalier-Smith T. The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:7–76. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-1-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Harris JK, Kelley ST, Spiegelman GB, Pace NR. The genetic core of the universal ancestor. Genome Res. 2003;13:407–12. doi: 10.1101/gr.652803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Baymann F, Lebrun E, Brugna M, Schoepp-Cothenet B, Giudici-Orticoni MT, Nitschke W. The redox protein construction kit: pre-last universal common ancestor evolution of energy-conserving enzymes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:267–74. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Margulis L. Symbiosis and evolution. Sci Am. 1971;225:48–57. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0871-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Margulis L. Symbiotic theory of the origin of eukaryotic organelles; criteria for proof. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1975;29:21–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Sagan D, Margulis L. Bacterial bedfellows: a microscopic menage a trois may be responsible for a major step in evolution. Nat Hist. 1987;96:26–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Guerrero R, Pedros-Alio C, Esteve I, Mas J, Chase D, Margulis L. Predatory prokaryotes: predation and primary consumption evolved in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:2138–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.7.2138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Bauer CE, Elsen S, Bird TH. Mechanisms for redox control of gene expression. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999;53:495–523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.53.1.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Poyton RO. Models for oxygen sensing in yeast: implications for oxygen-regulated gene expression in higher eucaryotes. Respir Physiol. 1999;115:119–33. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5687(99)00028-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Liu H, Colavitti R, Rovira II, Finkel T. Redox-dependent transcriptional regulation. Circ Res. 2005;97:967–74. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000188210.72062.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Shih SC, Claffey KP. Hypoxia-mediated regulation of gene expression in mammalian cells. Int J Exp Pathol. 1998;79:347–57. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2613.1998.00088.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Huber O, Sumper M. Algal-CAMs: isoforms of a cell adhesion molecule in embryos of the alga Volvox with homology to Drosophila fasciclin I. EMBO J. 1994;13:4212–22. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06741.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wenzl S, Sumper M. Sulfation of a cell surface glycoprotein correlates with the developmental program during embryogenesis of Volvox carteri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:3716–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Hallmann A, Kirk DL. The developmentally regulated ECM glycoprotein ISG plays an essential role in organizing the ECM and orienting the cells of Volvox. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:4605–17. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.24.4605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Green KJ, Viamontes GI, Kirk DL. Mechanism of formation, ultrastructure, and function of the cytoplasmic bridge system during morphogenesis in Volvox. J Cell Biol. 1981;91:756–69. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Sumper M, Hallmann A. Biochemistry of the extracellular matrix of Volvox. Int Rev Cytol. 1998;180:51–85. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61770-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Ender F, Godl K, Wenzl S, Sumper M. Evidence for autocatalytic cross-linking of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins during extracellular matrix assembly in Volvox. Plant Cell. 2002;14:1147–60. doi: 10.1105/tpc.000711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Sumper M, Nink J, Wenzl S. Self-assembly and cross-linking of Volvox extracellular matrix glycoproteins are specifically inhibited by Ellman’s reagent. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:2334–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Siu CH, Harris TJ, Wang J, Wong E. Regulation of cell-cell adhesion during Dictyostelium development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15:633–41. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Bowers-Morrow VM, Ali SO, Williams KL. Comparison of molecular mechanisms mediating cell contact phenomena in model developmental systems: an exploration of universality. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004;79:611–42. doi: 10.1017/S1464793103006389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Siu CH, Sriskanthadevan S, Wang J, Hou L, Chen G, Xu X, et al. Regulation of spatiotemporal expression of cell-cell adhesion molecules during development of Dictyostelium discoideum. Dev Growth Differ. 2011;53:518–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2011.01267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Sriskanthadevan S, Zhu Y, Manoharan K, Yang C, Siu CH. The cell adhesion molecule DdCAD-1 regulates morphogenesis through differential spatiotemporal expression in Dictyostelium discoideum. Development. 2011;138:2487–97. doi: 10.1242/dev.060129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Kuspa A, Loomis WF. The Genome of Dictyostelium discoideum. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;346:15–30. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-144-4:15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Dickinson DJ, Nelson WJ, Weis WI. A polarized epithelium organized by beta- and alpha-catenin predates cadherin and metazoan origins. Science. 2011;331:1336–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1199633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Fairclough SR, Dayel MJ, King N. Multicellular development in a choanoflagellate. Curr Biol. 2010;20:R875–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Ratcliff WC, Denison RF, Borrello M, Travisano M. Experimental evolution of multicellularity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;1009:1595–600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115323109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Bekker A, Holland HD. Oxygen overshoot and recovery during the early Paleoproterozoic. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2012;317-318:295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Roberts AM, Ohh M. Beyond the hypoxia-inducible factor-centric tumour suppressor model of von Hippel-Lindau. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008;20:83–9. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3282f310de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Loenarz C, Coleman ML, Boleininger A, Schierwater B, Holland PW, Ratcliffe PJ, et al. The hypoxia-inducible transcription factor pathway regulates oxygen sensing in the simplest animal, Trichoplax adhaerens. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:63–70. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Rytkönen KT, Storz JF. Evolutionary origins of oxygen sensing in animals. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:3–4. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Zhang K, Zhu L, Fan M. Oxygen, a Key Factor Regulating Cell Behavior during Neurogenesis and Cerebral Diseases. Front Mol Neurosci. 2011;4:5. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Allen M, Louise Jones J. Jekyll and Hyde: the role of the microenvironment on the progression of cancer. J Pathol. 2011;223:162–76. doi: 10.1002/path.2803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Welford SM, Giaccia AJ. Hypoxia and senescence: the impact of oxygenation on tumor suppression. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9:538–44. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Semenza GL. Defining the role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in cancer biology and therapeutics. Oncogene. 2010;29:625–34. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Lu X, Kang Y. Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors: master regulators of metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5928–35. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Cassavaugh J, Lounsbury KM. Hypoxia-mediated biological control. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:735–44. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.El Albani A, Bengtson S, Canfield DE, Bekker A, Macchiarelli R, Mazurier A, et al. Large colonial organisms with coordinated growth in oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr ago. Nature. 2010;466:100–4. doi: 10.1038/nature09166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Semenza GL. Hypoxia inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell. 2012;148:399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

