Abstract

A new protecting-group-free synthesis of the marine monocyclic ether (+)-brevisamide is reported. The enantioselective synthesis utilizes a key asymmetric Henry reaction and an Achmatowicz rearrangement for the formation of the tetrahydropyran ring. A penultimate Stille cross-coupling allows for an efficient installation of the conjugated (E,E)-diene side chain ultimately delivering (+)-brevisamide.
The art and science of natural product total synthesis has become increasingly more associated with the various priniciples of the “economies” of synthesis.1,2 Evaluation of protecting group use serves as one metric of synthetic efficiency and can provide a framework for developing a synthesis plan. Among various classes of natural products prepared by total synthesis without the use of protecting groups, examples featuring polyketides or cyclic ethers are scarce.2,3 Herein, we report a concise, enantioselective, protecting-group-free total synthesis of the diversely functionalized cyclic ether natural product brevisamide.
Brevisamide is a metabolite from Karenia brevis comprised of a complex functionalized tetrahydropyran core containing a conjugated 3,4-dimethylhepta-2,4-dienal and acetylated terminal amine subunits. The tetrahydropyran ring also contains methyl and hydroxyl substituents. Brevisamide has been a target of total synthesis for multiple research groups since its recent isolation by Wright and coworkers.4 By completion of the first total synthesis, the groups of Satake, Tachibana, and Wright provided conclusive evidence for the absolute and relative stereochemistry of brevisamide.5 Their synthesis is characterized by a stepwise construction of the pyran ring followed by a Suzuki–Miyaura coupling to assemble the dienal fragment. This synthesis required 21 steps in the longest linear sequence, 28 steps total, with an overall yield of 2.0%. In a subsequent paper, Satake and co-workers improved their overall synthetic yield to 8.6%.5c Lindsley and co-workers completed the second total synthesis using a different route in which the tetrahydropyran ring was formed by a reductive cyclization with samarium(II) iodide.6 A Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction was recruited to install the diene fragment. This synthesis was accomplished in 18 steps (longest linear sequence, 21 total) and 6.3% overall yield. Shortly after Lindsley's synthesis, Ghosh and co-workers described an alternative route using an asymmetric hetero-Diels–Alder reaction to form the tetrahydropyran ring of brevisamide. This synthesis provided brevisamide in higher enantiopurity than the prior two and required 23 steps total with the longest linear sequence of 19 steps and a ca. 1.5% overall yield from commercially available starting materials.7 The last reported total synthesis of brevisamide is described by Panek and Lee. A [4 + 2] annulation approach utilizing a (Z)-crotylsilane was used as a strategic basis for the synthesis. This route provided brevisamide in a 0.8% overall yield in 30 total steps, with the longest linear sequence of 27 steps from commercially available starting materials.8 Since this latest completed total synthesis, two formal syntheses have been accomplished by the groups of Smith and Sabitha.9
In devising our own approach, we became intrigued by the challenge of developing a concise, enantioselective, and protecting-group-free construction of the diversely functionalized tetrahydropyran ring in brevisamide. A synthesis plan based on the combination of a catalytic asymmetric Henry reaction and an Achmatowicz rearrangement,10 outlined in Scheme 1, proved to be successful in meeting this challenge. The final operation in the synthesis was envisioned to employ a Stille-cross-coupling reaction to install the conjugated (E,E)-dieneal.
Scheme 1.

Synthesis Plan for Brevisamide (1)
The synthesis of the aldehyde 5, shown in Scheme 2, begins from commercially available ethyl 3-(furan-2-yl)-propionate 6, which was treated with LiAlH4 to afford the corresponding primary alcohol. After oxidation, the resultant aldehyde was immediately submitted to the Corey–Fuchs reaction yielding dibromoalkene 7,11 which was treated with n-butyllithium and iodomethane to form the desired alkyne 8, along with a furan methylation byproduct. Addition of DMPU prior to the addition of iodomethane resulted in the isolation of only the desired methylated alkyne 8 in high yield. Aldehyde 5 was prepared directly from 8 by a Vilsmeier–Haack reaction in 90% yield.12
Scheme 2.

Synthesis of Aldehyde 5
With aldehyde 5 in hand, the key enantioselective Henry reaction was investigated. Although a variety of methods are available for this transformation, we focused on a procedure developed by Wan and co-workers.13 This method has been reported to provide products in high enantioselectivity, under practical reaction conditions at room temperature and within reasonable reaction times. The method employs a catalytic system derived from readily available Cu(OAc)2 ·H2O and ligand 9 in ethanol as the solvent. Much to our delight, when 5 was exposed to these conditions, the product 4 was isolated with a 99% ee. Extended reaction times resulted in accumulation of the nitroalkene 4a as a byproduct resulting from dehydration of the initially formed nitro-alcohol 4 (Scheme 3). To minimize this problem, the reaction was terminated after 40 h at room temperature and the products were separated to provide the requisite Henry addition product 4 (57% yield, 99% ee), the starting material (33% yield), and the nitroalkene 4a (10% yield). The starting material was then resubmitted to the reaction conditions to afford 4 in a 69% combined yield and 99% ee after one recycle.
Scheme 3.

Asymmetric Henry Reaction
After the development of the enantioselective Henry reaction, the synthesis was advanced as illustrated in Scheme 4. The nitro group in 4 was reduced to the corresponding amine with LiAlH4 under carefully controlled reaction conditions. Lithium aluminum hydride was preferred to other commonly used reagents for reduction of nitro compounds such as H2 and Pd/C, Raney-Nickel, and SmI2, due to incompatibility of these reagents with the alkyne group present in the substrate.13,14 After assessment of a variety of reaction conditions, it was determined that a drop-wise addition of a solution of the nitro compound 4 into a precooled solution of LiAlH4 in THF (−15 °C) limited the retro-Henry process leading to the formation of an undesired primary alcohol. The reaction was then heated to reflux, which delivered the primary amine in optimized yields. The primary amine was then chemoselectively acetylated with acetic anhydride in ethyl acetate–methanol (4:1), giving amide 10 in 67% yield over the two steps.
Scheme 4.
Synthesis of the Tetrahydropyran Core
According to our synthesis plan, acetamide 10 was now properly functionalized for the ensuing key Achmatowicz rearrangement. Furan 10 underwent oxidative ring expansion in the presence of NBS to form the cyclic hemiketal, which was then treated with BF3 ·OEt2 and Et3SiH to produce intermediate 11 in a satisfactory 54% yield.15 Installation of the methyl group was achieved by conjugate addition of lithium dimethylcuprate directly to enone 11 (81% yield, 8:1 dr).16
Our next goal was reduction of 12 under thermodynamic conditions to generate the more stable diastereomer 13 that has the desired configuration at the newly generated stereocenter. Our initial attempts centered on various versions of the Meerwein–Pondorf–Verley (MPV) reaction using Al(OPr-i)3 and Sm(OPr-i)3 reagents. With the aluminum-based reagent, the desired diastereomer 13 was formed exclusively at high temepratures (100 °C), however, at low yields. An unidentified byproduct was formed in significant quantitites apparently resulting from reactivity of the acetamide. At lower temperatures (75 °C), an equi-molar mixture of diastereomeric alcohols was produced. Similar outcomes were observed with the samarium-based reagent. Reduction with sodium borohydride under standard conditions in methanol produced the undesired axial alcohol exclusively. On the other hand, reduction with NaBH4 in aqueous THF substantially increased the fraction of the desired equatorial alcohol, giving a 1:1 mixture of separable products in 85% isolated yield.17 The undersired isomer could be separated and recycled through an additional oxidation–reduction sequence.
Installation of vinyl iodide proceeded in high regioselectivity and yield employing the silylcupration-iododesylilation protocol.18,19 Silylcupration took place with complete stereoselectivity and high regioselectivity (~13:1). Subsequent iododesilyation with N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) in hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) successfully delivered the (E)-iodoalkene 3 in high yield and with complete retention of the double bond geometry.18,20
Known vinyltin reagent 2 (prepared by hydrostannylation of 2-butyn-1-ol)21 was used in a Stille cross-coupling reaction with 3 to forge the conjugated diene (Scheme 5). Sasaki and co-workers previously reported a similar Stille coupling in the total synthesis of brevenal.20 In our work, copper(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate was replaced with the copper(I) bromide dimethylsulfide complex (CuBr•DMS) without any detrimental effect on the Pd2(dba)3/Ph3Ascatalyzed cross-coupling process, furnishing 14 in 78% yield. Completion of the synthesis was achieved with a chemoselective oxidation of the allylic alcohol using TEMPO in the presence of PhI(OAc)2 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature, yielding (+)-brevisamide (1) in 90% yield.7
Scheme 5.
Completetion of Brevisamide (1) Synthesis
In summary, the total synthesis of (+)-brevisamide (1) has been completed in 16 steps (longest linear sequence) and an overall yield of 2.5% starting from the commercially available ethyl 3-(furan-2-yl)propionate 6. The strategy was developed based on a notion of concise enantioselective assembly of the properly functionalized tetrahydropyran ring without the use of protecting groups. A catalytic asymmetric Henry reaction and then an Achmatowicz rearrangement were enlisted to successfully achieve this goal.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Eli Lilly, Amgen, and the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM077379). We thank Nicholas D. C. Tappin (EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland) and Craig Stivala (UC Santa Barbara) for performing preliminary experiments. Dr. Hongjun Zhou (UC Santa Barbara) is thanked for continued assistance with NMR spectroscopy.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available. General experimental procedures, characterization data, and copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for compounds 1–14. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- (1).Wender PA, Verma VA, Paxton TJ, Pillow TH. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41:40–49. doi: 10.1021/ar700155p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Hoffmann RW. Synthesis. 2006;21:3531–3541. [Google Scholar]
- (3).Young IS, Baran PS. Nat. Chem. 2009;1:193–205. doi: 10.1038/nchem.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Satake M, Bourdelais AJ, Van Wagoner RM, Baden DG, Wright JLC. Org. Lett. 2008;10:3465–3468. doi: 10.1021/ol801243n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).(a) Kuranaga T, Shirai T, Baden DG, Wright JLC, Satake M, Tachibana K. Org. Lett. 2009;11:217–220. doi: 10.1021/ol802426v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Van Wagoner RM, Satake M, Bourdelais AJ, Baden DG, Wright JLC. J. Nat. Prod. 2010;73:1177–1179. doi: 10.1021/np100159j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Tsutsumi R, Kuranaga T, Wright JLC, Baden DG, Ito E, Satake M, Tachibana K. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:6775–6782. [Google Scholar]; (d) Shirai T, Kuranaga T, Wright JLC, Baden DG, Satake M, Tachibana K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:1394–1396. [Google Scholar]
- (6).Fadeyi OO, Lindsley CW. Org. Lett. 2009;11:3950–3952. doi: 10.1021/ol9015755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Ghosh AK, Li J. Org. Lett. 2009;11:4164–4167. doi: 10.1021/ol901691d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Lee J, Panek JS. Org. Lett. 2009;11:4390–4393. doi: 10.1021/ol901801h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).(a) Smith AB, III, Kutsumura N, Potuzak J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:2117–2119. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sabitha G, Nayak S, Bhikshapathi M, Yadav JS. Org. Lett. 2011;13:382–385. doi: 10.1021/ol102658d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Achmatowicz O, Bukowski P, Szechner B, Zwierzchowska Z, Zamojski A. Tetrahedron. 1971;27:1973–1996. [Google Scholar]
- (11).Corey EJ, Fuchs PL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972;36:3769–3772. [Google Scholar]
- (12).Vilsmeier A, Haack A. Ber. 1927;60:119–122. [Google Scholar]
- (13).(a) Jin W, Li X, Huang Y, Wu F, Wan B. Chem.—Eur. J. 2010;16:8259–8261. doi: 10.1002/chem.201000964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Smith MB, March J. March's Advanced Organic Chemistry. 6th ed. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2007. pp. 1815–1823. [Google Scholar]
- (14).Kende AS, Mendoza JS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991;32:1699–1702. [Google Scholar]
- (15).Recent applications in synthesis:Nicolaou KC, Cole KP, Frederick MO, Aversa RJ, Denton RM. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:8875–8879. doi: 10.1002/anie.200703742.. Harris JM, O'Doherty GA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:183–187.. Burke MD, Berger EM, Schreiber SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:14095–14104. doi: 10.1021/ja0457415.. Noutsias D, Kouridaki A, Vassilikogiannakis G. Org. Lett. 2011;13:1166–1169. doi: 10.1021/ol200027f.. Henderson JA, Jackson KL, Phillips A. J. Org. Lett. 2007;9:5299–5302. doi: 10.1021/ol702559e..
- (16).Martin SF, Dodge JA, Burgess LE, Limberakis C, Hartmann M. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:3229–3246. [Google Scholar]
- (17).Oguchi T, Watanabe K, Ohkubo K, Abe H, Katoh T. Chem.—Eur. J. 2009;15:2826–2845. doi: 10.1002/chem.200802122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).(a) Ilardi EA, Stivala CE, Zakarian A. Org. Lett. 2008;10:1727–1730. doi: 10.1021/ol800341z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lu C-D, Zakarian A. Org. Lett. 2007;9:3161–3163. doi: 10.1021/ol071266e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For other applications, see:Coleman RS, Walczak MC, Campbell EL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:16038–16039. doi: 10.1021/ja056217g.. Zakarian A, Batch A, Holton RA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:7822–7824. doi: 10.1021/ja029225v.. Cha JY, Burnett GL, IV, Huang Y, Davidson JB, Pettus TRR. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:1361–1371. doi: 10.1021/jo102327e.. Parker KA, Denton RW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:2115–2116.. Xie Q, Denton R, Parker KA. Org. Lett. 2008;10:5345–5348. doi: 10.1021/ol802063h.. For a structural study of HFIP, see:Vuluga D, Legros J, Crousse B, Slawin AMZ, Laurence C, Nicolet P, Bonnet-Deplon D. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:1126–1133. doi: 10.1021/jo1023816..
- (19).(a) Fleming I, Roessler F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980:276–277. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fleming I, Newton TW, Roessler F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1981;1:2527. [Google Scholar]; (c) Fleming I, Newton TW. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1984;1:1805. [Google Scholar]; (d) Fleming I, Marigorta EM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985;38:4629–4632. [Google Scholar]; (e) Archibald SC, Barden DJ, Bazin JFY, Fleming I, Foster CF, Mandal AK, Mandal AK, Parker D, Takaki K, Ware AC, Williams ARB, Zwicky AB. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004;2:1051–1064. doi: 10.1039/b316899a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).(a) Fuwa H, Ebine M, Sasaki M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:9648–9650. doi: 10.1021/ja062524q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fuwa H, Ebine M, Bourdelais AJ, Baden DG, Sasaki M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:16989–16999. doi: 10.1021/ja066772y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Uenishi J, Kawahama R, Yonemitsu O, Wada A, Ito M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998;37:320–323. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980216)37:3<320::AID-ANIE320>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


