Skip to main content
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology logoLink to Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
. 2012 Jun;4(6):a011221. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011221

Hedgehog Signaling

Philip W Ingham 1
PMCID: PMC3367553  PMID: 22661636

Abstract

Hedgehog proteins are intercellular signaling molecules that play a central role in animal development. In response to the signal, Gli zinc finger proteins are shuttled along the primary cilium to the nucleus to activate target genes.


The Hedgehog (Hh) proteins belong to one of a small number of families of secreted signals that play a central role in the development of most metazoans. hh itself was originally identified as a mutation that causes a “segment polarity” phenotype in Drosophila—as were most of the core components of the Hh signal transduction pathway (Ingham et al. 2011). These components have been highly conserved between flies and vertebrates (Figs. 1 and 2); however, mammals express three related proteins, Sonic hedgehog (Shh), Indian hedgehog, and Desert hedgehog (Dhh), and genetic analysis in mice has uncovered a vertebrate-specific role of the primary cilium in Hh signaling (Goetz et al. 2009).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Hedgehog signaling (simplified view).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Hedgehog signaling.

An unusual feature of Hh proteins is their covalent coupling to cholesterol, which occurs during autocleavage of the proprotein to yield the signaling moiety, HhN (Beachy et al. 1997). HhN is also palmitoylated at its amino terminus by an acyl transferase encoded by the Drosophila skinny hedgehog gene (Skn). Secretion of lipidated HhN requires the function of a large multipass transmembrane protein, Dispatched, that is structurally related to the Hh receptor Patched (Ptch1) (Ingham et al. 2011). Binding of HhN to Ptc1 is promoted by two other transmembrane proteins, CDO and BOC (known as IHOG and BOI in Drosophila), which act redundantly to bind HhN via one of several fibronectin III (FnIII) motifs in their extracellular domains (Beachy et al. 2010). In its unbound state, Ptc1 localizes to the primary cilium (Rohatgi and Scott 2007), where it acts via a poorly characterized mechanism, thought to involve the transport of one or more lipids, to suppress the activity of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-like protein Smoothened (Smo) (Ayers and Thérond 2010).

The principal response of cells to HhN is the activation of target genes by the Gli zinc finger proteins. Gli2 and Gli3 (but not Gli1) are bifunctional transcription factors: their full-length forms function as transcriptional activators, but they can be converted into lower-molecular-weight transcriptional repressors. This is promoted by the phosphorylation of a series of motifs within the carboxy-terminal domain of the protein. These motifs are sequentially phosphorylated by PKA, GSK3, and CKI to generate recognition signals for the F-box protein bTrCP, a component of the SCF complex. This in turn catalyzes the ubiquitylation of the carboxyl terminus, targeting it for degradation by the proteasome to yield the truncated amino-terminal repressor forms, Gli2/3R (Ingham et al. 2011). These bind to Hh target genes to repress their transcription. Gli2/3 proteins appear to shuttle up and down the primary cilium in association with the Cos/Kif7 and SuFu proteins; in the absence of Smo activity, this association seems to promote their processing at the base of the primary cilium. Inactivation of Ptc by HhN results in Smo being transported to the tip of the primary cilium (a process that requires Kif3a and β-arrestin activity), where its activity promotes the dissociation of the Gli2/3-Cos-SuFu complex (Tukachinsky et al. 2010), releasing the full-length highly labile forms of the Gli proteins. These translocate to the nucleus and activate transcription of target genes, such as Ptch1, which attenuates the signal, Gli1, which amplifies the signal, and the genes encoding the cell cycle regulators, Myc, cyclin D, and E.

Acknowledgments

Figures 1 and 2 adapted, with permission, from Cell Signaling Technology (http://www.cellsignal.com).

Footnotes

Editors: Lewis Cantley, Tony Hunter, Richard Sever, and Jeremy Thorner

Additional Perspectives on Signal Transduction available at www.cshperspectives.org

REFERENCES

  1. Ayers KL, Thérond PP 2010. Evaluating smoothened as a G-protein-coupled receptor for Hedgehog signalling. Trends Cell Biol 20: 287–298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beachy PA, Cooper MK, Young KE, von Kessler DP, Park WJ, Hall TM, Leahy DJ, Porter JA 1997. Multiple roles of cholesterol in hedgehog protein biogenesis and signaling. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 62: 191–204 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beachy PA, Hymowitz SG, Lazarus RA, Leahy DJ, Siebold C 2010. Interactions between Hedgehog proteins and their binding partners come into view. Genes Dev 24: 2001–2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goetz SC, Ocbina PJ, Anderson KV 2009. The primary cilium as a Hedgehog signal transduction machine. Methods Cell Biol 94: 199–222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ingham PW, Nakano Y, Seger C 2011. Mechanisms and functions of Hedgehog signalling across the metazoa. Nat Rev Genet 12: 393–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rohatgi R, Scott MP 2007. Patching the gaps in Hedgehog signalling. Nat Cell Biol 9: 1005–1009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tukachinsky H, Lopez LV, Salic A 2010. A mechanism for vertebrate Hedgehog signaling: Recruitment to cilia and dissociation of SuFu-Gli protein complexes. J Cell Biol 191: 415–428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

RESOURCES