Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2012 May 1;22(9):3349–3353. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.02.107

Substituted aminopyrimidine protein kinase B (PknB) inhibitors show activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Timothy M Chapman a,, Nathalie Bouloc a, Roger S Buxton b, Jasveen Chugh a, Kathryn EA Lougheed b, Simon A Osborne a, Barbara Saxty a, Stephen J Smerdon c, Debra L Taylor a, David Whalley a
PMCID: PMC3368261  PMID: 22469702

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Keywords: Protein kinase B, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Aminopyrimidine, Structure–activity relationship

Abstract

A high-throughput screen against PknB, an essential serine–threonine protein kinase present in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), allowed the identification of an aminoquinazoline inhibitor which was used as a starting point for SAR investigations. Although a significant improvement in enzyme affinity was achieved, the aminoquinazolines showed little or no cellular activity against M. tuberculosis. However, switching to an aminopyrimidine core scaffold and the introduction of a basic amine side chain afforded compounds with nanomolar enzyme binding affinity and micromolar minimum inhibitory concentrations against M. tuberculosis. Replacement of the pyrazole head group with pyridine then allowed equipotent compounds with improved selectivity against a human kinase panel to be obtained.


More than 14 million people worldwide suffer from tuberculosis (TB) which in 2009 resulted in an estimated 1.7 million deaths.1 In particular, the increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant strains means that novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. PknB is one of 11 serine–threonine protein kinases (STPKs) found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) and has been shown to be essential for bacterial growth,2 and therefore inhibition of PknB represents a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of TB. PknB is an attractive target as the kinase domain contains less than 30% similarity with eukaryotic kinases, which offers promise for achieving selectivity for the mycobacterial kinase over those of the human host. M. tuberculosis is unusual amongst bacteria in having a higher number of STPKs in comparison to the more common two-component signalling systems,3 and of the other STPKs present, PknA has also been found to be essential while PknG has been reported to play a crucial role in the survival of mycobacteria within macrophages.4 Previous studies have focused on the potential of PknB and PknG as drug targets in M. tuberculosis, although the majority have reported significantly lower activity against whole cells than against the purified enzymes.2,4,5 This difference may be due in part to the nature of the TB cell wall, which is recognised as difficult to permeate, particularly due to its unique mycolic acid layer.6

A high throughput screen of our compound collection against the isolated PknB enzyme was performed through measuring the effect on the in vitro phosphorylation of the substrate GarA,7 and this identified compound 1 (Fig. 1) as a 1.35 μM inhibitor of PknB, which formed the starting point for our chemistry programme.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

HTS hit 1.

Initial SAR exploration around 1 was performed via synthetic access from 2,4-dichloroquinazoline 3 (Scheme 1). Introduction of the aminopyrazole was performed by nucleophilic substitution at the 4-position, followed by either a Suzuki coupling to introduce an aryl group or a second nucleophilic substitution to introduce a second amino substituent at the 2-position.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Reagents and conditions: (a) POCl3, N,N-dimethylaniline, reflux; (b) 3-amino-5-R1-pyrazole, EtOH, 20 °C; (c) R2B(OH)2, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, Et3N, MeOH, microwave, 140 °C or R2NH2, EtOH, microwave, 150 °C.

Replacement of the pyrazole methyl substituent with cyclopropyl gave a fourfold improvement in binding affinity (Table 1, 5a). The 4-pyridyl group could also be substituted by other aryl groups such as 4-fluorophenyl or phenyl while maintaining comparable potency (5b5e). Alkyl amines were also tolerated at this position, with cycloalkyl groups such as the cyclohexyl derivative 5f giving the best IC50. However, the introduction of highly polar or charged groups was not well tolerated at this position and led to a significant loss in potency. Screening of these compounds against M. tuberculosis in an Alamar blue cellular assay8 revealed that they possessed weak or no cellular efficacy. Measured log D values for these compounds were typically in excess of 4, and measurement of their plasma–protein binding (ppb) revealed that they were highly bound (>99%), leaving only a small free fraction available to bind to the enzyme. Furthermore, the physical properties of these compounds were not considered to be well disposed for crossing the TB cell wall, as its mycolic acid layer contains barriers to the passage of hydrophobic as well as hydrophilic molecules.6

Table 1.

SAR of disubstituted quinazolines

Compound R1 R2 or NHR2 PknB IC50/μMa
5a graphic file with name fx2.gif graphic file with name fx3.gif 0.322
5b graphic file with name fx4.gif graphic file with name fx5.gif 0.453
5c graphic file with name fx6.gif graphic file with name fx7.gif 1.162
5d graphic file with name fx8.gif graphic file with name fx9.gif 0.223
5e graphic file with name fx10.gif graphic file with name fx11.gif 0.440
5f graphic file with name fx12.gif graphic file with name fx13.gif 0.107
5g graphic file with name fx14.gif graphic file with name fx15.gif 0.428
a

Assay conditions are described in Ref. 8.

In order to improve the physical properties of the compounds with the aim of improving their cellular activity, it was decided to reduce the log D of the compounds and explore the effect of this in advancing the SAR. The quinazoline core was switched to a pyrimidine, and while retaining the cyclopropylaminopyrazole at the 4-position, a range of substituents including aryl and amino groups were introduced at the 2-position to allow exploration of the SAR (Scheme 2). This afforded compounds with improved potency against the enzyme (Table 2), and amongst the aryl variants, the 3-sulfonylphenyl compound 8d and 3-cyanophenyl derivative 8f showed the highest affinities at 86 and 87 nM, respectively. For the amino compounds, in addition to the cyclohexyl and cyclopentyl examples 8h and 8n at 84 and 115 nM, the substituted phenylethylamines 8k and 8l showed promising enzyme affinities of 74 and 64 nM, respectively. These compounds also demonstrated improved efficacy against M. tuberculosis although this was still relatively weak, with the majority of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) falling in the 63–250 μM range. The most active example was the 3-sulfonamidophenyl variant 8c at 31 μM.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: (a) 3-Amino-5-cyclopropylpyrazole, DIPEA, i-PrOH, 50 °C; (b) R1B(OH)2, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, Et3N, MeOH, microwave, 150 °C or R1NH2, DIPEA, i-PrOH, microwave, 170 °C.

Table 2.

SAR of disubstituted pyrimidines

Compound R1 or NHR1 PknB IC50/μMa M. tuberculosis MIC/μMa
8a graphic file with name fx16.gif 0.375 >500
8b graphic file with name fx17.gif 0.384 63
8c graphic file with name fx18.gif 0.393 31
8d graphic file with name fx19.gif 0.086 63
8e graphic file with name fx20.gif 0.241 63
8f graphic file with name fx21.gif 0.087 125
8g graphic file with name fx22.gif 0.202 125
8h graphic file with name fx23.gif 0.084 63
8i graphic file with name fx24.gif 0.354 63
8j graphic file with name fx25.gif 0.715 125
8k graphic file with name fx26.gif 0.074 63
8l graphic file with name fx27.gif 0.064 125
8m graphic file with name fx28.gif 0.217 250
8n graphic file with name fx29.gif 0.115 63
a

Assay conditions are described in Ref. 8.

Further improvements to the physical properties of the compounds were sought, and a basic amine side chain was introduced to give compounds with a lower log D. The 6-position was chosen as a suitable point for appending this side-chain as modelling studies suggested that this region of the molecule was solvent exposed, so would be amenable to the introduction of this group. A range of basic side chains were introduced into this position, initially with a phenyl group fixed at the 2-position (Scheme 3). The products, shown in Table 3 demonstrated sub-100 nM enzyme potency and generally improved MIC values, and compound 11e containing the (R)-3-dimethylaminopyrrolidine basic side-chain displayed an IC50 of 53 nM against the enzyme and a 16 μM MIC against M. tuberculosis. Oxygen-linked basic side chains were also well tolerated, for example compound 11f, which showed an IC50 of 56 nM against the enzyme and 31 μM MIC against the Mycobacterium.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Reagents and conditions: (a) 3-Amino-5-cyclopropylpyrazole, DIPEA, NaI, DMA, 100 °C; (b) R1R2NH, n-BuOH, microwave, 150–170 °C or R1OH, t-BuOK, THF, microwave, 160 °C.

Table 3.

SAR of trisubstituted pyrimidines

Compound NR1R2 or OR1 PknB IC50/μMa M. tuberculosis MIC/μMa m Log Db
11a graphic file with name fx30.gif 0.088 125 3.7
11b graphic file with name fx31.gif 0.121 63 3.6
11c graphic file with name fx32.gif 0.055 31 2.3
11d graphic file with name fx33.gif 0.073 31 2.3
11e graphic file with name fx34.gif 0.053 16 3.8
11f graphic file with name fx35.gif 0.056 31 3.4
a

Assay conditions are described in Ref. 8.

b

Log D values were measured by BioFocus.

Considering the enhanced enzyme binding affinity that had resulted from the presence of a 3-cyano or 3-sulfonyl group on the phenyl ring in the disubstituted variants (Table 2), these substituents were introduced into the trisubstituted pyrimidines aiming for a corresponding increase in enzyme potency and activity against M. tuberculosis. Starting with 4,6-dichloro-2-(methylthio)pyrimidine 12, the cyclopropylaminopyrazole group and the basic amine side-chain were sequentially introduced under nucleophilic displacement conditions. This was followed by a Liebeskind–Srogl coupling9 under microwave heating on the S-methyl pyrimidine 14 to install the desired aryl group (Scheme 4). However, the resultant compounds displayed modest gains in enzyme affinity (approximately twofold for 15b and 15c) and no significant improvement in activity against M. tuberculosis (Table 4), which remained between 31 and 63 μM.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Reagents and conditions: (a) 3-Amino-5-cyclopropylpyrazole, Et3N, NaI, DMA, microwave, 150 °C; (b) R1R2NH, n-BuOH, microwave, 170 °C; (c) R3PhB(OH)2, Pd(PPh3)4, copper(I) thiophene carboxylate, dioxane, microwave, 150 °C.

Table 4.

SAR of trisubstituted pyrimidines with functionalised phenyl ring portion

Compound NR1R2 R3 PknB IC50/μMa M. tuberculosis MIC/μMa
15a graphic file with name fx36.gif CN 0.056 63
15b graphic file with name fx37.gif CN 0.039 63
15c graphic file with name fx38.gif CN 0.023 31
15d graphic file with name fx39.gif SO2Me 0.040 63
a

Assay conditions are described in Ref. 8.

Despite the general improvement in MIC values obtained through introduction of the basic side chain to the pyrimidine core, efficacy against M. tuberculosis remained weaker than was desired. In an effort to improve the cellular activity, it was decided to replace the aminopyrazole head group with an aminopyridine group. This allowed the hydrogen bond donor count to be reduced, which was considered desirable for improving permeability through the M. tuberculosis cell wall. It also offered the potential for improved kinase selectivity by reducing the reliance on the binding energy gained at the kinase hinge region. These compounds were prepared following a similar sequence to that described in Scheme 4, replacing the aminopyrazole with the appropriate aminopyridine but using a palladium-catalysed amination for introduction of the aminopyridine instead of nucleophilic displacement. Initial variants showed a significant loss in binding affinity, but further exploration of the SAR revealed that pyridines carrying a substituent at the 4-position were optimal for enzyme inhibition and this allowed the IC50 to be restored to the double-digit nanomolar range (Table 5). However, in common with the aminopyrazoles, MIC values against M. tuberculosis remained in the micromolar region. Compound 16c displayed the most promising activity with a MIC of 8 μM.

Table 5.

SAR of trisubstituted pyrimidines containing pyridine head group

graphic file with name fx40.jpg

Compound R1 R2 PknB IC50/μMa M. tuberculosis MIC/μMa
16a H CN 1.99 31
16b OMe H 1.13 31
16c Cl H 0.176 8
16d CF3 CN 0.040 16
a

Assay conditions are described in Ref. 10.

The selectivity of the inhibitors was examined against other M. tuberculosis kinases and this revealed that they typically showed cross-affinity with PknF, although they displayed only modest inhibition of PknG. Aminopyrimidines featuring appended pyrazole groups have been reported in the literature as inhibitors of a number of human kinases,10 so achieving selectivity in these compounds was therefore a key consideration and their kinase selectivity against a 76-member human kinase panel was examined. Pleasingly compound 16c, containing the aminopyridine head group motif, showed an improvement in selectivity relative to 11e, which contains the aminopyrazole head group (Fig. 2). This is consistent with an expected gain in selectivity that may occur through reducing the number of H-bonds that can be formed with the kinase hinge region. Docking studies were performed using Glide™ (Schrödinger Inc.) on both the aminopyrazole and aminopyridine head group variants using the PknB crystal structure (ref: 2FUM)12 from the PDB, and the predicted binding modes of compounds 15c and 16d are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the aminopyrazoles can form up to 3 hydrogen bonds with the hinge region of the kinase, and the appended cyclopropyl group can form a face-on lipophilic interaction with the methionine gatekeeper residue. The cyano group on the phenyl ring points in the direction of a lysine residue. By contrast, in the aminopyridine variants two hydrogen bonds with the hinge region can be formed, and the 4-substituent on the pyridine head group is orientated in the direction of the gatekeeper.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kinase selectivity heat map comparing compounds 11e (top) and 16c (bottom) against a 76-member human kinase panel, screened at 10 μM inhibitor concentration. [Key: red: >90% inhibition; yellow: 70–90% inhibition; green: <70% inhibition.11]

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Example aminopyrazole 15c (left) and aminopyridine 16d (right) head group compounds docked into the PknB active site.

In summary, the starting point HTS hit was optimised for potency against PknB, and initial modifications showed promising gains in enzyme binding affinity but little or no cellular activity against M. tuberculosis. Switching from the quinazoline to a pyrimidine core and introduction of a basic side chain improved the physical properties of the molecules and resulted in improved cellular activities, in the double-digit micromolar region. While further optimisation gave improvements in enzyme binding affinity, this did not translate into improved efficacy against M. tuberculosis. Replacement of the aminopyrazole head group with an aminopyridine led to an initial loss in binding affinity, but this was regained following optimisation, and selectivity against a human kinase panel was improved. Although the best of these compounds still only showed whole cell MICs in the 10 μM region, this level of activity is commensurate with that reported for a number of other heterocyclic compounds which have shown activity against M. tuberculosis.13 Possible reasons for the significant difference in enzyme and whole cell activity were investigated, including poor cell wall permeability, the role of efflux pumps, protein binding in the assay media and inhibitor specificity, and this work is described in a separate paper.8

Acknowledgements

We thank Dony Patel, Tim Nott and Vicky Spivey for production of PknB enzyme and GarA substrate. This work was supported by Grants from the MRCT development gap fund (award A853-0058) and the MRC (U117585867 and U117584228).

References and notes

  • 1.WHO Report 2010, Global Tuberculosis Control, WHO Press, Geneva.[http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241564069_eng.pdf, Accessed: 29 July 2011].
  • 2.Fernandez P., Saint-Joanis B., Barilone N., Jackson M., Gicquel B., Cole S.T., Alzari P.M. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188:7778. doi: 10.1128/JB.00963-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Cole S.T., Brosch R., Parkhill J., Garnier T., Churcher C., Harris D. Nature. 1998;393:537. doi: 10.1038/31159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Av-Gay Y., Everett M. Trends Microbiol. 2000;8:238. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01734-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Narayan A., Sachdeva P., Sharma K., Saini A.K., Tyagi A.K., Singh Y. Physiol. Genomics. 2007;29:66. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00221.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Molle V., Kremer L. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;75:1064. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Walburger A., Koul A., Ferrari G., Nguyen L. Science. 2004;304:1800. doi: 10.1126/science.1099384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Hegymegi-Barakonyi B., Szekely R., Varga Z., Kiss R., Borbely G., Nemeth G. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008;15:2760. doi: 10.2174/092986708786242886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Szekely R., Waczek F., Szabadkai I., Nemeth G., Hegymegi-Barakonyi B., Eros D. Immunol. Lett. 2008;116:225. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brennan P.J., Nikaido H. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1995;64:29. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Villarino A., Duran R., Wehenkel A., Fernandez P., England P., Brodin P., Cole S.T., Zimny-Arndt U., Jungblut P.R., Cerveñansky C., Alzari P.M. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;350:953. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lougheed K.E.A., Osborne S.A., Saxty B., Whalley D., Chapman T., Bouloc N., Chugh J., Nott T.J., Patel D., Spivey V., Kettleborough C.A., Bryans J.S., Taylor D.L., Smerdon S.J., Buxton R.S. Tuberculosis. 2011;91:277. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liebeskind L.S., Srogl J. Org. Lett. 2002;4:979. doi: 10.1021/ol0200091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Humphries P.S., Lafontaine J.A., Agree C.S., Alexander D., Chen P., Do Q.-Q.T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19:2099. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.023. See for example: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ioannidis S., Lamb M.L., Wang T., Almeida L., Block M.H., Davies A.M. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:262. doi: 10.1021/jm1011319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lin W.-H., Hsieh S.-Y., Yen S.-C., Chen C.-T., Yeh T.-K., Hsu T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011;19:4173. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Harrington E.A., Bebbington D., Moore J., Rasmussen R.K., Ajose-Adeogun A.O., Nakayama T. Nat. Med. 2004;10:262. doi: 10.1038/nm1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kinase selectivity profiling was carried out at the National Centre for Protein Kinase Profiling in the MRC Protein Phosphorylation Unit at the University of Dundee.
  • 12.Wehenkel A., Fernandez P., Bellinzoni M., Catherinot V., Barilone N., Labesse G., Jackson M., Alzari P.M. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:3018. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.04.046. (PDB ref: 2FUM) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Chhabria M.T., Jani M.H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009;44:3837. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.04.002. See for example: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wilkinson B.L., Bornaghi L.F., Wright A.D., Houston T.A., Poulsen S.-A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007;17:1355. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.11.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhou B., He Y., Zhang X., Xu J., Luo Y., Wang Y. PNAS. 2010;107:4573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909133107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES