Abstract
Inflammation is not only a defensive mechanism against microbial invasion, but also frequently represents a critical response to tissue injury under sterile conditions. It is now well established that tissue injury leads to the release of endogenous molecules of intra- and extracellular origin acting as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs) can act as powerful DAMPs following their proteolytical release from the extracellular matrix. Recent investigations of SLRP signaling networks revealed new levels of complexity, showing that SLRPs can cluster different types of receptors and orchestrate a host of downstream signaling events. This review will summarize the evidence for the multifunctional proinflammatory signaling properties of the two archetypal SLRPs, biglycan and decorin. These secreted proteoglycans link the innate to the adaptive immune response and operate in a broad biological context, encompassing microbial defense, tumor growth and autoimmunity.
Keywords: biglycan, decorin, Inflammasome, macrophage, micro-RNA-21, PDCD4, sepsis, TGFβ, toll-like receptor, tumor
Introduction
Inflammation is a crucial process in the defense against invading pathogens. Neutrophils, macrophages and dendritic cells are capable of recognizing highly conserved microbial structures, referred to as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), via specific pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs).1-3 Five classes of PRRs have been identified to date. These receptors are characterized by distinct ligand recognition and cellular location: cell surface or endosomal Toll-like receptors (TLRs), cytoplasmatic NOD-like receptors (NLRs), intracellular RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene-I)-like receptors, transmembrane C-type lectin receptors (e.g., dectin-1) and AIM2 (absence in melanoma 2)-like receptors1,4 (Fig. 1). PAMP recognition by PRRs elicits innate immunity responses by triggering the nuclear factor κB (NFκB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), p38 or type I interferon signaling pathways.2,4,5 These signaling events result in secretion of cytokines, e.g., tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) or interleukin-1β (IL1β), and chemokins in order to recruit additional inflammatory cells to the site of infection.6 After the initial activation of an innate immunity response, the adaptive immune system provides a more specific response to control and eliminate the cause of infection. Several reports have addressed the role of receptor crosstalk linking innate and adaptive immunity.7-9 In addition, microRNAs (miRs) have been shown to act as fine-tuners of the inflammatory response reaction.10
Figure 1. Selected innate immunity receptors sensing various pathogens and endogenous danger signals. Schematic drawing depicting distinct ligand recognition and cellular location of selected pathogen recognition receptors sensing various pathogen-associated (extracellular, brown) and damage-associated (extracellular, green) molecular patterns. Abbreviations: AIM2, absence in melanoma 2; ds, double-stranded; HMGB1, high-mobility group box-1; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NLRP3, NLR family, pyrin domain containing 3; NOD, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein; TLR, toll-like receptor; RIG-I, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I; ss, single-stranded.
Over the last few decades, much has been revealed about the mechanisms of pathogen-mediated inflammation. However, inflammation may also occur during tissue injury in the absence of microbial pathogens, e.g., as a consequence of trauma, chemical damage or in ischemia-reperfusion injury.2,6 Moreover, sterile inflammation is a common feature in many pulmonary, renal and liver diseases, resulting in organ fibrosis.2 Non-pathogen-mediated inflammation is an important characteristic of atherosclerosis, tumorigenesis, gout, myocardial infarction, stroke and several autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus).2,11,12 With the high incidence of sterile inflammatory diseases, there is a considerable unmet medical need to resolve the mechanisms of innate immune activation in the absence of microbial pathogens.
It has become increasingly clear that tissue stress or injury leads to the release of endogenous molecules of intra- or extracellular origin acting as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).2,13 In this review, the complexity of proinflammatory signaling of the two matrix proteoglycans decorin and biglycan, both acting as DAMPs,14-16 will be addressed. Particular focus will be put on newly described mechanisms of how these molecules orchestrate the interaction of various receptors, which are involved in triggering sterile inflammation.15,16 Decorin- and biglycan-mediated receptor crosstalk involves TLRs, NLRs and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) receptors and is further fine-tuned by miR-21.15,16 Thus, we will focus on the multifunctional proinflammatory signaling properties of decorin and biglycan. These two archetypal SLRPs, when released in a soluble form, can link the innate to the adaptive immune response and can operate in a broad biological context, such as microbial defense, tumor growth and autoimmunity.
Intracellular and Extracellular DAMPs
DAMPs of intra- or extracellular origin, similar to PAMPs, are recognized by ligand-specific PRR and elicit innate immunity responses2,13,17 (Fig. 1). During cell necrosis, some exclusively intracellular components, such as heat shock proteins, purine metabolites (ATP or uric acid) and high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), are released into the extracellular space and thus turn into DAMPs.2
The extracellular matrix, present in almost every tissue and organ, serves as a vast reservoir of sequestered components. Upon tissue stress or injury, matrix components will be released and turn into signaling molecules.12,18,19 Among this large group of ECM components, only a few, such as biglycan,14 decorin,16 hyaluronan,20 versican,21 tenascin-C,22 fibrinogen and heparan sulfate fragments,23 are capable of interacting with PRRs, thereby alerting the innate immune system to impending tissue damage. These mechanisms give rise to a rapid response reaction without the need for de novo synthesis of danger molecules. It took several years to overcome the initial doubts concerning ECM components acting as endogenous ligands of PRRs. Recent data from in vivo studies, where contaminations are less likely, together with the neutralizing effects of antibodies directed against ECM-derived ligands of TLRs and NLRs, provided a reliable basis to support their role as endogenous danger signals. For further details, please refer to more specific reviews in references 12, 18, 19 and 24.
The Family of Small Leucine-rich Proteoglycans
It is remarkable that both TLRs and NLRs contain leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-motifs, which enable them to interact with other LRR-proteins.25,26 Several matrix proteoglycans contain LRR motifs in their protein core.27 The relatively small size of the protein core (up to 42 kDa) is another hallmark of this class of proteoglycans, explaining why these compounds are referred to as small leucine-rich proteoglycans.18,28-30 SLRPs are covalently substituted with glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains: chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate or keratan sulfate. The various lengths and states of sulfation contribute to the structural complexity of these molecules.28,31 According to their cysteine clusters, ear repeats, intron/exon organization and homologies at the protein and genomic levels, SLRPs are divided in five distinct classes.28 Biglycan and decorin, the two best-studied SLRPs, belong to the canonical class I and are substituted with one or two chondroitin/dermatan sulfate chains. Details regarding their classification have been reviewed recently in references 28 and 31. It is well established that SLRPs play a role in the stabilization and assembly of collagens and elastic fibers.32,33 Thus, for many years, SLRPs were considered to be merely static props of the ECM.
The finding that decorin, besides being a structural matrix component, acts as a signaling molecule gave rise to a new paradigm of how SLRPs regulate a host of biologic processes, such as differentiation, proliferation, migration and apoptosis. Decorin is capable of binding to four different receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR),34 insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR),35-38 Met39 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2),40 thereby impacting on fibrogenesis,19 tumor growth and metastatic spreading.12,41,42 A summary of recent data demonstrating the intricacy of decorin signaling, which links innate immunity, inflammation and tumor growth16 is provided below.
Biglycan: A Signaling Molecule and Endogenous Ligand of TLR2 and TLR4
Despite its structural homology with decorin, biglycan is not sharing the ability of decorin to bind to EGFR.43 Interaction of biglycan with other RTKs involved in decorin signaling has not been investigated up to now. Even though there is some evidence for the involvement of biglycan in inflammation,44-46 only recently biglycan-mediated signal transduction has been described in macrophages.14
Biglycan is abundant in the ECM of various organs.47 However, in its sequestered form, it cannot act as a signaling molecule.14 Upon tissue stress or injury, biglycan becomes proteolytically released from the matrix to signal impending danger to the immune system.19 Several proteolytic enzymes, such as bone morphogenic protein (BMP)-1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-3 and MMP-13 have been described to cleave the biglycan protein core.48-51 In its soluble form, intact biglycan acts as an endogenous ligand of TLR2 and TLR4 in macrophages and dendritic cells, resulting in rapid activation of p38, Erk and NFκB pathways and enhanced synthesis of proinflammatory TNFα8,14,15 (Fig. 2). Furthermore, biglycan-mediated signaling via TLR2/4 leads to the synthesis of various chemoattractants for neutrophils and macrophages, such as macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) 8,14 (Fig. 2). Infiltrating macrophages stimulated by proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL1β) are capable of synthesizing biglycan themselves.14 Probably not all biglycan fragments proteolytically cleaved from the ECM bind to and signal through TLR2/4. Therefore, it is conceivable that de novo synthesis of biglycan by macrophages serves as an amplifying mechanism to provide the full-length “signaling” form of biglycan at sites of injury. Based on this mechanism, it appears that biglycan initiates a feedforward cycle, which is able to trigger and boost the inflammatory response reaction both in an autocrine and paracrine manner.
Figure 2. Decorin- and biglycan-driven proinflammatory signaling involves multi-receptor crosstalk. Decorin and biglycan interact with TLR2 and TLR4 and stimulate the expression of various chemo- and cytokines, mainly proinflammatory TNFα and pro-IL1β but also antiinflammatory IL-10. By clustering TLR2/4- with purinergic P2X7/P2X4 receptors biglycan activates the NLRP3-inflammasome and caspase-1 and induces the processing and secretion of mature IL1β. Decorin, by withdrawing active TGFβ1 from binding to its receptors, inhibits maturation of miR-21, a posttranscriptional inhibitor of PDCD4. Enhanced protein abundance of PDCD4, a translational inhibitor of IL-10, causes reduction of the IL-10 protein. Abbreviations: ASC, apoptosis associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; CXCL13, chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 13; IL, interleukin; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; miR, micro-RNA; NLRP3, NLR family, pyrin domain containing 3; PDCD4, programmed cell death protein 4; RANTES, regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; TGF, transforming growth factor; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α.
Biglycan Orchestrates the Interaction of TLR2/4 with Purinergic P2X7/P2X4 Receptors
After some initial skepticism, the concept of soluble forms of matrix components triggering inflammation has finally caught on. Further investigations of the biglycan signaling networks provided a new surprise, showing that biglycan is capable of clustering several types of receptors and orchestrating their signaling.15 Beside triggering the synthesis of TNFα, biglycan promotes secretion of mature IL1β, a proinflammatory cytokine important both in acute and chronic inflammation.52 Usually the synthesis, processing and secretion of mature IL1β requires at least two steps, namely, the synthesis of pro-IL1β via TLR-dependent NFκB activation and stimulation of the NLR family, pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and caspase-1, which leads to cleavage pro-IL1β. Surprisingly, soluble biglycan alone is capable of stimulating the synthesis and secretion of mature IL1β. This is brought about by organizing a multi-receptor complex consisting of TLR2 and TLR4 and purinergic P2X7 and P2X4 receptors on the cell surface of macrophages (Fig. 2). By clustering these receptors, biglycan induces cooperativity of this newly formed receptor complex. By binding to TLR2/4, biglycan initiates the synthesis of pro-IL1β and NLRP3 inflammasome. By simultaneously signaling through the P2X7 and P2X4 receptor, it induces the formation and activation of the NLRP3/apoptosis associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC) inflammasome and of caspase-1, which drives the maturation and secretion of IL1β (Fig. 2). Biglycan-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome involves reactive oxygen species (ROS) and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). The clustering of TLR2/4 with P2X7/P2X4 receptors is presumably facilitated by the complex structure of the biglycan molecule involving both the protein core and the GAG side chains. So far, our data showed that only intact biglycan is capable of triggering proinflammatory signaling in macrophages and dendritic cells.
Interaction of Biglycan with TLR2/4 in Pathogen-mediated and Sterile Inflammation
The demonstration that biglycan-evoked modulation of TLR2/4 activity is operational in vivo, provides the most robust proof that proinflammatory effects of biglycan are not due to contamination with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other TLR4- and TLR2-ligands. Overexpression of soluble biglycan in healthy wild-type TLR4-, TLR2- and TLR2/TLR4-deficient mice shows that biglycan exerts proinflammatory effects via both TLRs.8 Furthermore, biglycan deficiency53 reduces the inflammatory response both under pathogen-mediated14 and sterile conditions.8,15 Both in TLR4- and TLR2-dependent, LPS- or zymosan-induced sepsis, lack of the biglycan gene markedly enhances survival and is associated with lower levels of circulating TNFα and IL1β as well as reduced numbers of infiltrating mononuclear cells in septic lungs.14,15 What is more, in biglycan-deficient mice, lower levels of IL1β in plasma and the lung, the major target organ of sepsis in mice, are associated with a reduction of NLRP3-inflammasome expression and active caspase-1.15 This observation clearly indicates involvement of the inflammasome in the downstream signaling of biglycan in vivo. Thus, the role of biglycan in microbial inflammation is probably to trigger inflammation via a second TLR, which is not involved in pathogen sensing, thereby potentiating the pathogen-induced inflammatory response.
Beside its impact on the pathogen-induced immune response, protective effects of biglycan deficiency were found in experimental models of noninfectious inflammatory renal diseases, e.g., unilateral ureteral obstruction and lupus nephritis.8,15 Lack of biglycan results in a marked reduction of TNFα and IL1β and of infiltrating mononuclear cells in these models.8,15 These effects are NLRP3- and caspase-1-dependent.8,15 On the other hand, overexpression of soluble biglycan caused stimulation of various chemoattractants, promotes infiltration of mononuclear cells and results in more pronounced organ damage.8 Thus, it appears that in sterile inflammation, soluble biglycan amplifies the inflammatory response reaction by involving TLR2/4 and the NLRP3 inflammasome.
Several authors have described the coincidence of biglycan overexpression with enhanced inflammation and severe tissue injury.54-56 The correlation between enhanced abundance of biglycan and reduction of organ function in various sterile inflammatory renal diseases has been particularly well documented.8,19,55-58 Upregulation of biglycan in aortic stenosis, characterized by lipid accumulation and inflammation,59 results in enhanced synthesis of phospholipid transfer protein via stimulation of TLR2.60 Furthermore, higher levels of biglycan in cardiac transplant coronary arteriopathy,58 severe ocular surface disease61 and in adipose tissue62 suggest a role for biglycan in the perpetuation of inflammation. Further studies concerning the mechanisms of biglycan-driven inflammation in those pathophysiological processes would improve our understanding of how sterile inflammation is triggered.
Biglycan Signaling Bridges Innate and Adaptive Immunity
The importance of biglycan signaling in the immune response is further underlined by recent findings indicating that biglycan is also a component of the adaptive immune system.8,63 In lupus nephritis (LN), a renal manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, biglycan, induces macrophages and dendritic cells to express chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 13 (CXCL13), the major chemoattractant for B and B1 cells. This is brought about by biglycan signaling through TLR2/4 and initiating the production of ROS.8 B1 cells, particularly important for autoantibody production, are involved in an early, T cell-independent immune response. By attracting B1 cells to the kidney, biglycan triggers autoantibody production without T-cell involvement.
In patients with lupus nephritis and in lupus-prone mice, the presence of circulating biglycan has been described.8 This is of particular relevance, because only soluble biglycan is capable of acting as a proinflammatory signaling molecule.14 Indeed, renal and plasma levels of biglycan correlate with the initiation and progression of LN. Furthermore, expression of CXCL13, recruitment of chemokine (C-X-C) motif receptor 5 (CXCR5)-expressing B/B1 cells into the kidney as well as organ damage and albuminuria strongly depend on biglycan expression.8
Beside chemoattracting B cells, biglycan signaling via TLR2/4 also induces the expression of RANTES, MCP-1 and MIP-1α, thereby recruiting macrophages and T cells into the kidney.8 In addition, biglycan plays a crucial role in MHC I- and MHC II-restricted T‑cell cross-priming by acting through TLR2/4 receptors and their adaptor proteins, myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and TIR-domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon β (TRIF). MHC II-dependent, antigen-specific T-cell activation is mainly mediated by TLR4.63 These results were further confirmed in experimental autoimmune perimyocarditis (EAP). In this model, biglycan signals via TLR4 as a potent amplifier of specific cardiomyocyte antigen presentation to prime T cells. Biglycan initiates an autoreactive immune response without influencing postinfarction fibrosis or infiltration of antigen presenting cells.63
Several other findings implicate biglycan to impact on both the innate and adaptive immune system. Biglycan stimulates the development, growth and differentiation in cells of the monocytic lineage.64 Furthermore, biglycan strongly binds to the complement factor C1q65 with yet-unknown biological consequences. It acts as a ligand of CD44 and thereby appears to be involved in the recruitment of CD16-negative natural killer cells.66
Thus, biglycan signaling provides an important link between innate and adaptive immunity. This concept advances our understanding of the etiology of B- and T cell-mediated inflammatory disease entities driven by soluble components of the extracellular matrix.
Decorin as Endogenous Ligand of TLR2/TLR4 and TGFβ1 Inhibitor Triggers Dual Proinflammatory Signaling
Recently it was shown that soluble decorin induces proinflammatory signaling, thereby linking innate immunity, inflammation and tumorigenesis.16 Soluble decorin has been identified as a novel endogenous ligand of TLR2 and TLR4 in macrophages. Decorin autonomously activates Erk and p38 MAPKs and typically for a TLR2/4 ligand initiates mRNA expression and protein synthesis of pro- (Tnf and Il12b) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (Il10) (Fig. 2). In the presence of LPS, decorin enhanced the effects of LPS on the synthesis of proinflammatory TNFα and IL-12 by signaling additionally via TLR2. Surprisingly, different effects of decorin on the translational regulation of IL-10 were described, depending on whether decorin was acting on macrophages alone or together with LPS. Decorin alone increased Il10 mRNA and protein expression, whereas in combination with LPS, decorin further amplified LPS-mediated upregulation of Il10 mRNA but suppressed LPS-triggered IL-10 protein synthesis.16 The underlying mechanisms are more complex than those expected by TLR2/4 signaling alone.
As ligands of TLRs, both LPS and decorin trigger the synthesis of programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4),16 a translational inhibitor of IL-10.67,68 However, LPS-mediated synthesis of PDCD4 is followed by a rapid decline of PDCD4 abundance.68 In contrast to decorin, LPS induces active TGFβ1, which processes primary (pri-miR-21) to precursor (pre-miR-21) miR-21 and enhances mature miR-21,16 a post-transcriptional inhibitor of PDCD4.68 Reduced PDCD4 protein causes enhancement of IL-10, thereby promoting the resolution of inflammation. Addition of decorin to LPS inhibits active TGFβ1 with a subsequent decline in miR-21, leading to a reduction of IL-10 and further switch of cytokine profile toward a proinflammatory phenotype16 (Fig. 2).
Importantly, these mechanisms appear to operate in a broad biological context, linking pathogen-mediated with sterile inflammation, as shown for sepsis and growth retardation of established tumor xenografts. In sepsis, decorin is an early response gene evoked by inflammation. Decorin is markedly elevated in septic patient plasma, as well as in the plasma and tissues of septic mice. In sepsis, decorin alone mimicks the effects of LPS by enhancing plasma and tissue levels of proinflammatory TNFα, IL-12 and PDCD4. However, when administered together with LPS, it potentiates the proinflammatory response of LPS by inhibiting active TGFβ1, miR-21 and, hence, LPS-mediated IL-10 production. In tumor xenografts, overexpression of decorin results in TLR2/4-driven synthesis of PDCD4, TNFα, IL-12 and TGFβ1/miR-21-mediated inhibition of PDCD4 suppression. This decorin-evoked signaling can shift the immune reaction to a more apoptotic and inflammatory response with strong antitumorigenic effects, resulting in a marked retardation of tumor growth.16
Thus, decorin signaling boosts the inflammatory response in sepsis and tumor development. During sepsis, these mechanisms tend to inhibit the resolution of inflammation and may cause a state of hyperinflammation. On the other hand, decorin-mediated inhibition of miR-21, immunosuppressive TGFβ1 and anti-inflammatory IL-10 along with the stimulation of proinflammatory PDCD4, TNFα and IL-12 might represent an attractive approach for cancer therapy.16 Taken together, these findings show that decorin similar to biglycan is capable of orchestrating multiple signaling pathways acting as a crucial regulator of the inflammatory response reaction.
Future Directions
Taking into account the high prevalence of sterile inflammation in disorders, such as atherosclerosis, gout, myocardial infarction, stroke, fibrotic processes of various organs, autoimmune diseases and tumorigenesis, there is a large unmet medical need to develop more specific antiinflammatory therapies. The available evidence demonstrating a direct role of ECM components as signals of tissue stress or damage markedly improved our understanding of the etiology of sterile inflammation. Among various ECM components, SLRPs are particularly suited to interact with TLR and NOD-like receptors, as both ligands and receptors contain LRRs in their protein structure. In this context, the scarcity of data addressing the role of SLRPs in the regulation of inflammation is surprising. Beside the aforementioned studies, there is also evidence for the influence of lumican on inflammatory processes.69-73 Data regarding the role of other 14 members of SLRP family are sparse. Future studies are needed to explore the molecule-specific affinities to different receptors and orchestration of their downstream signaling events.
In spite of an increasing body of evidence regarding biglycan- and decorin-mediated regulation of inflammatory processes, several questions need to be addressed before therapeutic strategies can be developed. Only soluble and intact biglycan or decorin are capable of triggering proinflammatory signaling. Therefore, the question arises why, when and for what reason SLRPs become present in the circulation. Could their presence in circulation become a future biomarker for inflammatory diseases? Furthermore, the importance of the protein core and GAG side chains for binding and initiating crosstalk among various receptors has to be explored to a greater detail. Of particular importance for the development of therapeutic approaches appears to be the identification of LRRs as well as the adaptor molecules involved in SLRP/receptor interaction.
Acknowledgments
Research in the author’s laboratory regarding the subject area covered by this review was supported by the German Research Council (SFB 815, project A5, SCHA 1082/2–1, Excellence Cluster ECCPS to L.S.) and by National Institutes of Health grants RO1 CA39481, RO1 CA47282 and RO1 CA120975 (R.V.I.). We apologize to those researchers whose work could not be cited due to space limitation.
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- CXCL13
Chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 13
- DAMP
damage-associated molecular pattern
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- GAG
glycosaminoglycan
- IL
interleukin
- LN
lupus nephritis
- LPS
lipopolysaccharide
- LRR
leucine-rich repeat
- MAPK
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MCP-1
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- MIP
macrophage inflammatory protein
- miR
microRNA
- NFκB
nuclear factor κB
- NLR
NOD-like receptor
- NLRP3
NLR family, pyrin domain containing 3
- PAMPs
pathogen-associated molecular patterns
- PDCD4
programmed cell death protein 4
- PRR
pathogen recognition receptor
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- SLRP
small leucine-rich proteoglycan
- TGF
transforming growth factor
- TLR
Toll-like receptor
- TNFα
Tumor necrosis factor α
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/cc/article/20316
References
- 1.Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010;140:805–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen GY, Nuñez G. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:826–37. doi: 10.1038/nri2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ronald PC, Beutler B. Plant and animal sensors of conserved microbial signatures. Science. 2010;330:1061–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1189468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kawai T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity. 2011;34:637–50. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee MS, Kim YJ. Signaling pathways downstream of pattern-recognition receptors and their cross talk. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:447–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060605.122847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McDonald B, Kubes P. Cellular and molecular choreography of neutrophil recruitment to sites of sterile inflammation. J Mol Med (Berl) 2011;89:1079–88. doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0784-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mills KH. TLR-dependent T cell activation in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:807–22. doi: 10.1038/nri3095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moreth K, Brodbeck R, Babelova A, Gretz N, Spieker T, Zeng-Brouwers J, et al. The proteoglycan biglycan regulates expression of the B cell chemoattractant CXCL13 and aggravates murine lupus nephritis. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:4251–72. doi: 10.1172/JCI42213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lehuen A, Diana J, Zaccone P, Cooke A. Immune cell crosstalk in type 1 diabetes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:501–13. doi: 10.1038/nri2787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O’Neill LA, Sheedy FJ, McCoy CE. MicroRNAs: the fine-tuners of Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:163–75. doi: 10.1038/nri2957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Trinchieri G. Cancer and Inflammation: An Old Intuition with Rapidly Evolving New Concepts. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:677–706. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans, at the crossroad of cancer growth and inflammation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012;22:56–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kono H, Rock KL. How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:279–89. doi: 10.1038/nri2215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schaefer L, Babelova A, Kiss E, Hausser HJ, Baliova M, Krzyzankova M, et al. The matrix component biglycan is proinflammatory and signals through Toll-like receptors 4 and 2 in macrophages. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2223–33. doi: 10.1172/JCI23755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Babelova A, Moreth K, Tsalastra-Greul W, Zeng-Brouwers J, Eickelberg O, Young MF, et al. Biglycan, a danger signal that activates the NLRP3 inflammasome via toll-like and P2X receptors. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:24035–48. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.014266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Merline R, Moreth K, Beckmann J, Nastase MV, Zeng-Brouwers J, Tralhão JG, et al. Signaling by the matrix proteoglycan decorin controls inflammation and cancer through PDCD4 and MicroRNA-21. Sci Signal. 2011;4:ra75. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Piccinini AM, Midwood KS. DAMPening inflammation by modulating TLR signalling. Mediators Inflamm. 2010 doi: 10.1155/2010/672395. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schaefer L. Extracellular matrix molecules: endogenous danger signals as new drug targets in kidney diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010;10:185–90. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schaefer L. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans in kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1200–7. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010050570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Termeer C, Benedix F, Sleeman J, Fieber C, Voith U, Ahrens T, et al. Oligosaccharides of Hyaluronan activate dendritic cells via toll-like receptor 4. J Exp Med. 2002;195:99–111. doi: 10.1084/jem.20001858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim S, Takahashi H, Lin WW, Descargues P, Grivennikov S, Kim Y, et al. Carcinoma-produced factors activate myeloid cells through TLR2 to stimulate metastasis. Nature. 2009;457:102–6. doi: 10.1038/nature07623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Midwood K, Sacre S, Piccinini AM, Inglis J, Trebaul A, Chan E, et al. Tenascin-C is an endogenous activator of Toll-like receptor 4 that is essential for maintaining inflammation in arthritic joint disease. Nat Med. 2009;15:774–80. doi: 10.1038/nm.1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Johnson GB, Brunn GJ, Kodaira Y, Platt JL. Receptor-mediated monitoring of tissue well-being via detection of soluble heparan sulfate by Toll-like receptor 4. J Immunol. 2002;168:5233–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.10.5233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sorokin L. The impact of the extracellular matrix on inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:712–23. doi: 10.1038/nri2852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu B, Huan T, Gong J, Zhou P, Bai Z. Domain combination of the vertebrate-like TLR gene family: implications for their origin and evolution. J Genet. 2011;90:401–8. doi: 10.1007/s12041-011-0097-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Inohara C, Chamaillard, McDonald C, Nuñez G. NOD-LRR proteins: role in host-microbial interactions and inflammatory disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:355–83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Proteoglycans in health and disease: novel regulatory signaling mechanisms evoked by the small leucine-rich proteoglycans. FEBS J. 2010;277:3864–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07797.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Biological functions of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans: from genetics to signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:21305–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R800020200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brandan E, Cabello-Verrugio C, Vial C. Novel regulatory mechanisms for the proteoglycans decorin and biglycan during muscle formation and muscular dystrophy. Matrix Biol. 2008;27:700–8. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Merline R, Schaefer RM, Schaefer L. The matricellular functions of small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs) J Cell Commun Signal. 2009;3:323–35. doi: 10.1007/s12079-009-0066-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schaefer L, Schaefer RM. Proteoglycans: from structural compounds to signaling molecules. Cell Tissue Res. 2010;339:237–46. doi: 10.1007/s00441-009-0821-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kalamajski S, Oldberg A. The role of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in collagen fibrillogenesis. Matrix Biol. 2010;29:248–53. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Young MF, Bi Y, Ameye L, Xu T, Wadhwa S, Heegaard A, et al. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans in the aging skeleton. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2006;6:364–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Iozzo RV, Moscatello DK, McQuillan DJ, Eichstetter I. Decorin is a biological ligand for the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:4489–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.4489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schönherr E, Sunderkötter C, Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Decorin, a novel player in the insulin-like growth factor system. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:15767–72. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500451200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schaefer L, Tsalastra W, Babelova A, Baliova M, Minnerup J, Sorokin L, et al. Decorin-mediated regulation of fibrillin-1 in the kidney involves the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor and Mammalian target of rapamycin. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:301–15. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Merline R, Lazaroski S, Babelova A, Tsalastra-Greul W, Pfeilschifter J, Schluter KD, et al. Decorin deficiency in diabetic mice: aggravation of nephropathy due to overexpression of profibrotic factors, enhanced apoptosis and mononuclear cell infiltration. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60(Suppl 4):5–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Iozzo RV, Buraschi S, Genua M, Xu SQ, Solomides CC, Peiper SC, et al. Decorin antagonizes IGF receptor I (IGF-IR) function by interfering with IGF-IR activity and attenuating downstream signaling. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:34712–21. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.262766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Goldoni S, Humphries A, Nyström A, Sattar S, Owens RT, McQuillan DJ, et al. Decorin is a novel antagonistic ligand of the Met receptor. J Cell Biol. 2009;185:743–54. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200901129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khan GA, Girish GV, Lala N, Di Guglielmo GM, Lala PK. Decorin is a novel VEGFR-2-binding antagonist for the human extravillous trophoblast. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25:1431–43. doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Goldoni S, Iozzo RV. Tumor microenvironment: Modulation by decorin and related molecules harboring leucine-rich tandem motifs. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:2473–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Iozzo RV, Sanderson RD. Proteoglycans in cancer biology, tumour microenvironment and angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:1013–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01236.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moscatello DK, Santra M, Mann DM, McQuillan DJ, Wong AJ, Iozzo RV. Decorin suppresses tumor cell growth by activating the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:406–12. doi: 10.1172/JCI846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schaefer L, Macakova K, Raslik I, Micegova M, Gröne HJ, Schönherr E, et al. Absence of decorin adversely influences tubulointerstitial fibrosis of the obstructed kidney by enhanced apoptosis and increased inflammatory reaction. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:1181–91. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64937-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schaefer L, Beck KF, Raslik I, Walpen S, Mihalik D, Micegova M, et al. Biglycan, a nitric oxide-regulated gene, affects adhesion, growth, and survival of mesangial cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:26227–37. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210574200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen XD, Bian X, Teslovich TM, Stephan DA, Young MF. Dissection of the sets of genes that control the behavior of biglycan-deficient pre-osteoblasts using oligonucleotide microarrays. Bone. 2005;37:192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bianco P, Fisher LW, Young MF, Termine JD, Robey PG. Expression and localization of the two small proteoglycans biglycan and decorin in developing human skeletal and non-skeletal tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 1990;38:1549–63. doi: 10.1177/38.11.2212616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Monfort J, Tardif G, Reboul P, Mineau F, Roughley P, Pelletier JP, et al. Degradation of small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycans by matrix metalloprotease-13: identification of a new biglycan cleavage site. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R26. doi: 10.1186/ar1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Boukpessi T, Menashi S, Camoin L, Tencate JM, Goldberg M, Chaussain-Miller C. The effect of stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) on non-collagenous extracellular matrix proteins of demineralized dentin and the adhesive properties of restorative resins. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4367–73. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Calabrese GC, Gazzaniga S, Oberkersch R, Wainstok R. Decorin and biglycan expression: its relation with endothelial heterogeneity. Histol Histopathol. 2011;26:481–90. doi: 10.14670/HH-26.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Scott IC, Imamura Y, Pappano WN, Troedel JM, Recklies AD, Roughley PJ, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-1 processes probiglycan. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:30504–11. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004846200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood. 2011;117:3720–32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-273417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xu T, Bianco P, Fisher LW, Longenecker G, Smith E, Goldstein S, et al. Targeted disruption of the biglycan gene leads to an osteoporosis-like phenotype in mice. Nat Genet. 1998;20:78–82. doi: 10.1038/2477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang S, Schmaderer C, Kiss E, Schmidt C, Bonrouhi M, Porubsky S, et al. Recipient Toll-like receptors contribute to chronic graft dysfunction by both MyD88- and TRIF-dependent signaling. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3:92–103. doi: 10.1242/dmm.003533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wu H, Chen G, Wyburn KR, Yin J, Bertolino P, Eris JM, et al. TLR4 activation mediates kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2847–59. doi: 10.1172/JCI31008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Leemans JC, Butter LM, Pulskens WP, Teske GJ, Claessen N, van der Poll T, et al. The role of Toll-like receptor 2 in inflammation and fibrosis during progressive renal injury. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Anders HJ, Schlöndorff D. Toll-like receptors: emerging concepts in kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2007;16:177–83. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32803fb767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bedke J, Kiss E, Schaefer L, Behnes CL, Bonrouhi M, Gretz N, et al. Beneficial effects of CCR1 blockade on the progression of chronic renal allograft damage. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:527–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01654.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mohty D, Pibarot P, Després JP, Côté C, Arsenault B, Cartier A, et al. Association between plasma LDL particle size, valvular accumulation of oxidized LDL, and inflammation in patients with aortic stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:187–93. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.154989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Derbali H, Bossé Y, Côté N, Pibarot P, Audet A, Pépin A, et al. Increased biglycan in aortic valve stenosis leads to the overexpression of phospholipid transfer protein via Toll-like receptor 2. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:2638–45. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Saito T, Nishida K, Sugiyama H, Yamato M, Maeda N, Okano T, et al. Abnormal keratocytes and stromal inflammation in chronic phase of severe ocular surface diseases with stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:404–10. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.127738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Adapala VJ, Adedokun SA, Considine RV, Ajuwon KM. Acute inflammation plays a limited role in the regulation of adipose tissue COL1A1 protein abundance. J Nutr Biochem. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.02.013. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Popovic ZV, Wang S, Papatriantafyllou M, Kaya Z, Porubsky S, Meisner M, et al. The proteoglycan biglycan enhances antigen-specific T cell activation potentially via MyD88 and TRIF pathways and triggers autoimmune perimyocarditis. J Immunol. 2011;187:6217–26. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kikuchi A, Tomoyasu H, Kido I, Takahashi K, Tanaka A, Nonaka I, et al. Haemopoietic biglycan produced by brain cells stimulates growth of microglial cells. J Neuroimmunol. 2000;106:78–86. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(99)00258-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sjöberg AP, Manderson GA, Mörgelin M, Day AJ, Heinegård D, Blom AM. Short leucine-rich glycoproteins of the extracellular matrix display diverse patterns of complement interaction and activation. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:830–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kitaya K, Yasuo T. Dermatan sulfate proteoglycan biglycan as a potential selectin L/CD44 ligand involved in selective recruitment of peripheral blood CD16(-) natural killer cells into human endometrium. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;85:391–400. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0908535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hilliard A, Hilliard B, Zheng SJ, Sun H, Miwa T, Song W, et al. Translational regulation of autoimmune inflammation and lymphoma genesis by programmed cell death 4. J Immunol. 2006;177:8095–102. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.8095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sheedy FJ, Palsson-McDermott E, Hennessy EJ, Martin C, O’Leary JJ, Ruan Q, et al. Negative regulation of TLR4 via targeting of the proinflammatory tumor suppressor PDCD4 by the microRNA miR-21. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:141–7. doi: 10.1038/ni.1828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wu F, Vij N, Roberts L, Lopez-Briones S, Joyce S, Chakravarti S. A novel role of the lumican core protein in bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced innate immune response. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:26409–17. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702402200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lee S, Bowrin K, Hamad AR, Chakravarti S. Extracellular matrix lumican deposited on the surface of neutrophils promotes migration by binding to beta2 integrin. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:23662–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.026229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Carlson EC, Lin M, Liu CY, Kao WW, Perez VL, Pearlman E. Keratocan and lumican regulate neutrophil infiltration and corneal clarity in lipopolysaccharide-induced keratitis by direct interaction with CXCL1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:35502–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705823200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Vij N, Roberts L, Joyce S, Chakravarti S. Lumican regulates corneal inflammatory responses by modulating Fas-Fas ligand signaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:88–95. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lohr K, Sardana H, Lee S, Wu F, Huso DL, Hamad AR, et al. Extracellular matrix protein lumican regulates inflammation in a mouse model of colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:143–51. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


