Skip to main content
European Spine Journal logoLink to European Spine Journal
. 2011 Jun 4;21(Suppl 4):396–399. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1843-1

Anterior migration of spinal cord after cervical corpectomy

Yu Qian 1,, Guojian Xu 1, Jun Zhang 1, Xiaofeng Zhao 1, Dong Wen 1
PMCID: PMC3369039  PMID: 21643826

Abstract

Posterior migration of spinal cord is a common complication of posterior cervical decompression, whereas anterior migration of spinal cord after anterior cervical decompression has not been reported previously. This report presents a case of anterior migration of spinal cord after cervical corpectomy. A 65-year-old male underwent a cervical corpectomy of the C4 and C5 for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The postoperative MRI showed that spinal cord was decompressed. However, at 12 months postoperatively, the patient complained that improved gait aggravated again, and the MRI showed an anterior migration of the spinal cord at the level of the C4 and C5, and a compression of spinal cord at the level of caudal endplate of C3. Secondary surgery, laminaplasty of C3 and C4 was conducted. The postoperative MRI showed that the spinal canal increased at the C3 and C4 levels, and the spinal cord went through smoothly without sharp turning.

Keywords: Corpectomy, Complication, Spinal cord migration, Cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Introduction

Anterior cervical corpectomy has been commonly performed for cervical spondylotic myelopathy for decades, and the relevant complications of this procedure have been discussed extensively. The common once included iatrogenic injuries of adjacent blood vessels, nerves and oesophagus [15]; bone graft related complications [68] and internal fixation related complications [2, 9]. However, spinal cord migration, a common complication in posterior cervical decompression procedure [1012], has not been reported as a complication of anterior decompression surgeries. We describe a case of an anterior migration of spinal cord after anterior cervical corpectomy in a patient with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Case Report

A 65-year-old male had a 6-month history of numbness in his fingers and “unbalance” gait. Neurological examination showed hyperreflexia, quadriparesis, and spasticity in all four extremities. The preoperative MRI showed the marked stenosis of the cervical spinal canal from C3 to C6 (Fig. 1). The patient was diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and the JOA score was 9 points. Corpectomy of C4 and C5 and fusion from C3 to C6 via anterior approach was performed, and the posterior longitudinal ligament from C4 to C5 was removed as well. Numbness of upper extremities and unbalanced gait were gradually released after decompression procedure and the JOA score increased to 12 points at 3 months postoperatively. The postoperative MRI confirmed that spinal cord was decompressed. (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The preoperative MRI showed the stenosis of spinal canal from C3 to C6 and the spinal cord was compressed

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

X-ray showed that the anterior corpectomy of C4 and C5 with cervical fusion from C3 to C6 was performed after primary surgery, and MRI showed that the spinal cord compression was released by corpectomy

The patient complained that the gait got “unbalance” again from 12 months postoperatively, and the JOA score dropped to 9 points again. X-ray showed that cervical fusion was achieved from C3 to C6 without migration of plate and screws, whereas MRI showed an anterior migration of the spinal cord at the level of the C4 and C5, and at the level of caudal endplate of C3, the spinal cord turned sharply, and high information in the spinal cord was observed beneath the turning in T2 weight (Fig. 3). Secondary surgery, laminaplasty of C3 and C4 via posterior approach was conducted at 15 months after the primary surgery. The postoperative MRI showed that the spinal canal increased at C3 and C4 levels, and the spinal cord went through smoothly without sharp turning (Fig. 4). The JOA score increased to 11 points 4 weeks after secondary surgical procedure.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

X-ray showed that cervical fusion was achieved from C3 to C6 without migration of plate and screws at 12 months postoperatively (a, b). MRI showed the anterior migration of spinal cord at the level of C4 and C5, and at the level of caudal endplate of C3, the spinal cord turned sharply (c, d), and high information zone in the spinal cord was observed beneath the turning in T2 weight (d)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

X-ray, MRI and CT after secondary surgery showed that the spinal canal increased at the C3 and C4 levels (ae), and the spinal cord went through smoothly without sharp turning (c, d)

Discussion

The purposes of surgical procedure for cervical spondylotic myelopathy are decompression of spinal cord and reconstruction of cervical lordotic alignment. Basically, there are two approaches for cervical spinal cord decompression, anterior approach and posterior approach [13, 14]. Mostly, the compression such as herniated disc and/or osteophyma of vertebral bodies are from the anterior of spinal cord, and the discectomy or corpectomy via anterior approach is commonly believed to be able to achieve direct decompression for spinal cord, while laminoplasty or laminectomy via posterior approach is widely accepted as an indirect decompression and recommended for cervical myelopathy with multilevel spondylosis [15, 16].

The complications of decompression surgeries for cervical spondylotic myelopathy have been widely discussed, including approach relevant lesions [17, 18], decompression relevant nerve lesions [19, 20], fusion relevant adjacent segment disease [21] and others [2224]. Migration of spinal cord is one of the complications of decompression surgical procedure which has been reported for years [1012]. Due to the physiological lordosis of cervical spine, it is understandable that all the previous discussions focus on the posterior migration of spinal cord after posterior decompression, laminoplasty or laminectomy procedure [1012], and according to the literature available, it has not been reported the anterior migration of spinal cord after anterior decompression procedure for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

In this case, corpectomy of two segments via anterior approach was conducted in primary surgical procedure, and posterior longitudinal ligament was removed as well. Compared to the MRI view at 3 months postoperatively, significant anterior migration of spinal cord was observed at 12 months postoperatively, and the secondary surgery was necessary since the spinal cord compression occurred at the interface between decompression area and non-decompression area.

There are three possible causes of anterior migration of cervical spinal cord after anterior decompression in this case. The first one is corpectomy of multiple levels. In this case the posterior wall of C4 and C5 vertebral bodies was removed, along with posterior longitudinal ligament at these two levels. It means that the anterior wall of cervical spinal canal was opened. Thus, there would be space for anterior migration of spinal cord. Secondly, the enlargement of spinal cord occurred after decompression. It was reported that the anteroposterior diameter of cervical cord enlarged after posterior decompression, and it was significantly correlated with spinal canal expansion [15, 25, 26]. Since the anterior wall of spinal canal had been opened, the enlarged spinal cord would herniate to the opened “window”. The third possible cause is lordotic alignment cervical spine. The study conducted by Baba et al. [25] demonstrated that the posterior cord migration was significantly correlated with spinal cord lordosis after posterior decompression procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. In this case, the physiological curve of cervical spine decreased the preoperatively, and little lordosis was reconstructed after the primary procedure. As a result, the postoperative spinal cord with little lordosis increased the risk of anterior migration of cord.

Several lessons can be taken from this case. The awareness of anterior migration of spinal cord as a complication of anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy should be raised by spine surgeons. Anterior migration of spinal cord might occur after multiple level corpectomy, especially when the posterior longitudinal ligament is removed during the procedure. Spinal cord compression might occur at the level between decompression area and non-decompression area. Adequate reconstruction of cervical lordosis and the removal of posterior osteophyma of adjacent vertebra might decrease the risk of the anterior migration of spinal cord and cord compression.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Bernhardt M, Hynes RA, Blume HW, White AA., 3rd Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:119–128. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199301000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Macdonald RL, Fehlings MG, Tator CH, Lozano A, Fleming JR, Gentili F, Bernstein M, Wallace MC, Tasker RR. Multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy and fibular allograft fusion for cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:990–997. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.6.0990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Scuderi GJ, Eismont FJ, McGuire RA, Singh K, Garfin SR. Early failure of long segment anterior cervical plate fixation. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:410–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matz PG, Pritchard PR, Hadley MN. Anterior cervical approach for the treatment of cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2007;60:S64–S70. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000215399.67006.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Daniels AH, Riew KD, Yoo JU, Ching A, Birchard KR, Kranenburg AJ, Hart RA. Adverse events associated with anterior cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:729–738. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200812000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fernyhough JC, White JI, LaRocca H. Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:S561–S564. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199110001-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hillard VH, Apfelbaum RI. Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for multilevel cervical discectomy. Spine J. 2006;6:242S–251S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thongtrangan I, Balabhadra RS, Kim DH. Management of strut graft failure in anterior cervical spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15:E4. doi: 10.3171/foc.2003.15.3.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Paramore CG, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK. Radiographic and clinical follow-up review of Caspar plates in 49 patients. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:957–961. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.6.0957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adams CB, Logue V. Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. II. The movement and contour of the spine in relation to the neural complications of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1971;94:568–586. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Batzdorf U, Batzdorff A. Analysis of cervical spine curvature in patients with cervical spondylosis. Neurosurgery. 1988;22:827–836. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198805000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alker G. Neuroradiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:850–853. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198807000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cunningham MR, Hershman S, Bendo J (2010) Systematic review of cohort studies comparing surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:537–543 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Heary RF, Holly LT, Ryken TC, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ, Resnick DK. Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11:130–141. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matsuyama Y, Kawakami N, Mimatsu K. Spinal cord expansion after decompression in cervical myelopathy. Investigation by computed tomography myelography and ultrasonography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1657–1663. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199508000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Okada Y, Ikata T, Yamada H, Sakamoto R, Katoh S. Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:2024–2029. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Clements DH, O’Leary PF. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:1023–1025. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199015100-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Apfelbaum RI, Kriskovich MD, Haller JR. On the incidence, cause, and prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2906–2912. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tomita K, Kawahara N, Toribatake Y, Heller JG. Expansive midline T-saw laminoplasty (modified spinous process-splitting) for the management of cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:32–37. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dai L, Ni B, Yuan W, Jia L. Radiculopathy after laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:846–849. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B5.8580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:519–528. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yonenobu K, Fuji T, Ono K, Okada K, Yamamoto T, Harada N. Choice of surgical treatment for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985;10:710–716. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198510000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:1969–1973. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199609010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE, Pobereskin L. Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:199–204. doi: 10.3171/spi.2000.93.2.0199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Azuchi M, Imura S. Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol. 1996;243:626–632. doi: 10.1007/BF00878657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yone K, Sakou T, Yanase M, Ijiri K. Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance image evaluations of the spinal cord in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:S388–S392. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199210001-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Spine Journal are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES