Skip to main content
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B logoLink to Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
. 2012 Jun;13(6):494–502. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1100356

Cadmium accumulation in different pakchoi cultivars and screening for pollution-safe cultivars*

Ying Chen 1,2, Ting-qiang Li 1,†,, Xuan Han 1, Zhe-li Ding 1, Xiao-e Yang 1, Ye-fei Jin 2
PMCID: PMC3370294  PMID: 22661212

Abstract

The selection and breeding of pollution-safe cultivars (PSCs) is a practicable and cost-effective approach to minimize the influx of heavy metal to the human food chain. In this study, both pot-culture and field experiments were conducted to identify and screen out cadmium pollution-safe cultivars (Cd-PSCs) from 50 pakchoi (Brassica rapa L. ssp. chinensis) cultivars for food safety. When treated with 1.0 or 2.5 mg/kg Cd, most of the pakchoi cultivars (>70%) showed greater or similar shoot biomass when compared with the control. This result indicates that pakchoi has a considerable tolerance to soil Cd stress. Cd concentrations in the shoot varied significantly (P<0.05) between cultivars: in two Cd treatments (1.0 and 2.5 mg/kg), the average values were 0.074 and 0.175 mg/kg fresh weight (FW), respectively. Cd concentrations in the shoots of 14 pakchoi cultivars were lower than 0.05 mg/kg FW. In pot-culture experiments, both enrichment factors (EFs) and translocation factors (TFs) of six pakchoi cultivars were lower than 1.0. The field studies further confirmed that the Hangzhouyoudonger, Aijiaoheiye 333, and Zaoshenghuajing cultivars are Cd-PSCs, and are therefore suitable for growth in low Cd-contaminated soils (≤1.2 mg/kg) without any risk to food safety.

Keywords: Cadmium pollution, Food safety, Pakchoi, Pollution-safe cultivars

1. Introduction

Soil contamination by heavy metals has gained considerable public attention because of their potential damage to human health and ecosystems even at low concentrations (Alloway, 1995). Cadmium (Cd) is one of the most toxic heavy metals in the environment due to its high mobility and severe toxicity to organisms (Li et al., 2009). There are both natural and anthropogenic sources of Cd in soil, including short-or long-range mining, atmospheric deposition, irrigation water, utilization of fertilizers, and application of municipal sewage-wastes, compost sewage sludges, and manures (Das et al., 1997; Arduini et al., 2006; Singh et al., 2006). In China, with the development of modern industry and agriculture, Cd has posed a serious problem for safe food production, and at least 13 330 ha of farmland has been contaminated by varying levels of Cd (Liu et al., 2009). It is therefore urgent that environmental and soil scientists to identify suitable approaches for reducing Cd accumulation in food crops.

There are several options available to remediate heavy metal contaminated soils. Conventional methods include soil excavation and landfill of the top contaminated soils ex situ; these methods are highly effective, but too expensive due to the high costs involved in the disposal of the contaminated soil, transportation, and backfill of the original site with clean soil (Zhou and Song, 2004; Zhu et al., 2004). Phytoremediation has been widely considered as a cost-effective approach to remediate metal/metalloid contaminated soils, and considerable progress has been made in this area in recent years (Zhu et al., 2004). Phytoextraction, the use of green plants to clean up contaminated soil, has attracted attention as an environmentally friendly and low-input remediation technique (Chaney et al., 1997; McGrath and Zhao, 2003). This technology makes the use of hyperaccumulator plants that extract pollutants from the soil and accumulate them in their harvestable above-ground biomass. However, the practical utility of this technology is limited due to the low biomass of hyperaccumulators. The demand for food in China is constantly increasing due to the expansion of the population, thus farmers cannot afford to fallow agricultural soils for remediation, especially where soils are only slightly or moderately contaminated with pollutants. It is therefore urgent to find a new way to minimize the influx of heavy metal pollutants into the human food chain to reduce potential health risks (Yu et al., 2006).

Earlier results showed that the uptake and translocation of trace elements in plants vary greatly not only among plant species but also among cultivars of the same species (Zhang et al., 2002; Stolt et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2011). Crop species and cultivars differ in their genetic tendency to take up trace elements, and this fact provides new opportunities to minimize harmful elements in the food chain by selecting and breeding crops for low uptake potential (Grant et al., 2008). Based on this fact and earlier reports, Yu et al. (2006) proposed the concept of pollution-safe cultivars (PSCs), i.e., cultivars in which edible parts accumulate specific pollutants at a level low enough for safe consumption even when grown in contaminated soil. In recent years, as an alternative choice, selection and breeding of PSCs has attracted much more attention and interest (Grant et al., 2008). Many researchers have placed greater emphasis on producing Cd-PSCs of several grain crops (Clarke et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2007; Zeng et al., 2008). However, little work has been done on selection of Cd-PSC vegetables.

Most of the Cd (more than 70%) uptake by humans comes from vegetables (Ryan et al., 1982). It is therefore very important to minimize Cd accumulation in different parts of vegetables. Pakchoi (Brassica rapa L. ssp. chinensis), a cruciferous leafy vegetable, is widely planted in China, especially in southern China; identification of pakchoi genotypes with low Cd accumulation for food safety is therefore especially important. Variations in Cd concentration among cultivars have been reported in some vegetable species, including carrot (Harrison, 1986), cucumber (Harrison and Staub, 1986), lettuce (Thomas and Harrison, 1991), potato (Dunbar et al., 2003), and Chinese cabbage (Liu et al., 2009; 2010). However, to our knowledge, there is limited information on the screening of Cd-PSCs in pakchoi. Thus, pot-culture and field experiments were conducted with the objectives to (1) investigate genotypic differences in uptake and accumulation of Cd among 50 pakchoi cultivars, and to (2) identify and screen out Cd-PSCs among 50 pakchoi cultivars.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Soil characterization

The soil used in the pot experiment was collected from the surface layer (0–20 cm) of the experimental station in the farm of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. The field experiment was conducted after the pot experiment on a farm in Cixi, Zhejiang Province, China. The site was slightly contaminated due to application of municipal sewage-wastes. Basic physical and chemical properties of the soil were analyzed according to the routine analytical methods of agricultural chemistry in soil (Lu, 1999). Selected properties of the test soils are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Selected physiochemical characteristics of the two test soils

Soil property Pot-culture soil Field-culture soil
pH 6.64 6.15
Organic matter (g/kg) 17.5 13.8
Total N (g/kg) 1.02 1.25
Available P (mg/kg) 12.8 13.6
Available K (mg/kg) 78.6 91.6
Total Cd (mg/kg) 0.26 1.20
Cation exchange capacity (CEC) (cmol/kg) 12.0 14.4
Particle composition (g/kg)
 Sand (2.000–0.020 mm) 450 390
 Silt (0.020–0.002 mm) 340 347
 Clay (≤0.002 mm) 210 263

2.2. Experimental design

2.2.1. Pot experiment

Surface layers (0–20 cm deep) of cultivated soils were air-dried, ground, and sieved to pass through a 4-mm mesh for pot experiment use. The dimensions of the pot were 180 mm×150 mm (diameter×height). Each pot contained 2.5 kg of soil samples. There were three treatments: CK (control), T1 (Cd 1.0 mg/kg) and T2 (Cd 2.5 mg/kg). To simulate field conditions, the soils were equilibrated for one month after spiked with Cd. The seeds of 50 pakchoi cultivars were collected from seed companies from the Yangtze River and Pear River delta of China, and the names and sources of the selected 50 cultivars are listed in Table 2. Healthy seeds were surface sterilized with 1% (w/w) sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 20 min, washed several times with distilled water, and then germinated for 24 h at 28 °C in the dark; uniformly germinated seeds (10 seeds per pot) were then sown in soil in April 2008. Two weeks after sowing, the seedlings were subsequently thinned to five plants. These pots were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replicates for each treatment. The plants were allowed to grow for eight weeks under open field conditions and no fertilizers were applied. Soil moisture content was adjusted to 50% of the water-holding capacity by watering to weight weekly with deionized water. At the end of experiment, five plants were harvested and each plant was separated into root and shoot parts. These parts were washed thoroughly with tap water and rinsed with distilled water. The fresh weight (FW) was recorded. The samples were then dried at 70 °C for 72 h. Dry weights (DWs) of shoots and roots were recorded. Dry plant samples were ground using a stainless steel mill and passed through a 60 mesh sieve prior to Cd analysis.

Table 2.

Names and sources of the selected 50 cultivars cultivars cultivars

No. Name Source
1 Jinguanqingjiang Foshan, China
2 Siyueman Hangzhou, China
3 Xizilv Hangzhou, China
4 Gaogengbai Hongkong, China
5 Zhouyeheiyoudonger Shaoxing, China
6 Aihuangtou Shaoxing, China
7 Yangzhouqing Yangzhou, China
8 Qingyou 4 Nanjing, China
9 Qingjiang 456 Shantou, China
10 Yihexiabao Taiwan, China
11 Sijiqingjiang Shantou, China
12 Zaoshenghuajing Japan
13 Aikangqing Hangzhou, China
14 Shanghaiqing Shanghai, China
15 Hangzhouyoudonger Hangzhou, China
16 Huqing 1 Shanghai, China
17 Taiwanmingzhu Taiwan, China
18 Changgeng Hangzhou, China
19 Teaiqing Hangzhou, China
20 Lvlinghuo Nanjing, China
21 Suzhouqing Suzhou, China
22 Xiawangqing Japan
23 Lifengqinggeng Japan
24 Huaqing Wuhan, China
25 Huahuangqinggeng Japan
26 Qibao Shanghai, China
27 Gaohuaqinggeng Hongkong, China
28 Shanghaiaikang Shanghai, China
29 Aijiaoheiye 333 Guangzhou, China
30 Kexing Mianyang, China
31 Datouqingjiang Taiwan, China
32 Aijiaodatou Guangzhou, China
33 Kangre 605 Japan
34 Aijisuzhouqing Suzhou, China
35 Jinxiawang Shantou, China
36 Fubaokangre Nantong, China
37 Sijiqing Shantou, China
38 Hangzhoubai Hangzhou, China
39 Heidatou Shanghai, China
40 Kangre 805 Nantong, China
41 Canbaicai Hangzhou, China
42 Huangjinbai Chengdu, China
43 Shanghaixiaqing Shanghai, China
44 Ribenlvguan Japan
45 Wuyueman Hangzhou, China
46 Taiwanqingxiu Taiwan, China
47 Lvyangchun Yangzhou, China
48 Lvxing Nanjing, China
49 Yangzirekangqing Yangzhou, China
50 Lvxiu 91-1 Qingdao, China

2.2.2. Field experiment

According to the standards for the identification of Cd-PSCs put forward by Liu et al. (2009) with some modification, six pakchoi cultivars with low Cd accumulation were selected, and were further tested in a field experiment. Randomized block design with four replications was used in the field experiment. Each block was 24 m2 (6 m long by 4 m wide). Seeds were sowed directly into the soil in September 2008. The management of water and fertilizer was the same as the pot experiment. The plants were allowed to grow for eight weeks. At the end of experiment, 50 plants were randomly sampled from each block. The pretreatment of the plants was the same as described in the pot experiment.

2.3. Chemical analysis

Plants were digested with a mixture of concentrated HNO3 and HClO4 (5:1, v/v) in polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) vessels. The digest was transferred to a 50-ml volumetric flask, filled to 50 ml, and filtered. Metal concentrations in the digest were determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES; iCAP 6000, Thermo Scientific, Cambridge, UK). Soil samples were collected from both pots and field blocks after the plants were harvested, thoroughly mixed, air-dried in the laboratory, ground up using a mortar and pestle, and passed through a 100 mesh sieve. Total Cd in the soil was analyzed by digestion with concentrated HNO3, HClO4, and HF (5:1:1, v/v/v), and Cd concentration in the solution was determine by ICP-AES. Enrichment factor (EF) is calculated as the ratio of Cd concentration in the shoots to the Cd concentration in the soil, and it was used to evaluate the ability of pakchoi to accumulate Cd. The translocation factor (TF) was used to evaluate the capacity of pakchoi to translocate Cd from roots to shoots. It was calculated as the ratio of Cd concentration in the shoots of a plant to the Cd concentration in its roots (Baker and Whiting, 2002). The National Standard of the People’s Republic of China (GB 2762-2005) (MHC, 2005) was used to evaluate the safety of pakchoi grown in Cd-contaminated soils. The maximum permissible concentration (MPC) of Cd for vegetables is 0.05 mg/kg FW (Yu et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2010).

2.4. Statistical methods

All data were statistically analyzed using the SPSS package (Version 11.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were analyzed with a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Cd accumulation values are expressed as means±standard deviation (SD) of the four replicates (P<0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Shoot biomass

After eight weeks of growth under different Cd levels, large differences in shoot biomass among cultivars were observed (Fig. 1). Shoot biomasses of 50 cultivars ranged from 19.8 to 70.1 g/pot for T1 and from 20.1 to 67.7 g/pot for T2. Compared with the control, the shoot biomasses of 32 cultivars under Cd treatments (T1 or T2) were not significantly different, indicating that these cultivars have high tolerance to Cd toxicity. For 13 other cultivars, however, the shoot biomass decreased significantly (P<0.05), especially for plants under the T2 treatment. In contrast, the shoot biomasses of the Aihuangtou, Yihexiabao, Changgeng, Shanghaiaikang and Kexing cultivars increased significantly during the eight weeks of growth in the T2 treatment, as compared with the control.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Shoot biomasses of 50 pakchoi cultivars under three Cd treatments

3.2. Cd accumulation in pakchoi in pot condition

The variation of shoot Cd concentrations among 50 pakchoi cultivars in pots was significant (P<0.05) (Fig. 2). Under the control treatment, the Cd concentrations in shoots ranged from 0.022 to 0.055 mg/kg FW, and only four pakchoi cultivars exceeded 0.050 mg/kg FW, indicating that most of these pakchoi cultivars are PSCs when grown in non-contaminated soil. However, with the increase of Cd concentrations in the soil, the Cd accumulation in the shoots of pakchoi cultivars increased gradually. Under the T1 treatment, shoot Cd concentrations of 36 pakchoi cultivars were greater than 0.050 mg/kg FW, and exceeded MPC of Cd in vegetables. Using this standard, the 14 pakchoi cultivars that fell below the MPC of Cd were identified as Cd-PSCs; however, the shoot biomass of the Jinxiawang cultivar decreased significantly under Cd treatments, and thus 13 pakchoi cultivars were selected as the Cd-PSCs (Table 3). Under the T2 treatment, shoot Cd concentrations in all pakchoi samples except for Aijiaoheiye 333 exceeded 0.050 mg/kg FW (Table 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cd concentrations in the shoots of 50 pakchoi cultivars under three Cd treatments

Table 3.

Cd concentrations in the shoots of 13 selected pakchoi cultivars under three Cd treatments

Cultivar Shoot Cd concentration (mg/kg FW)a
Control Cd 1.0 mg/kg Cd 2.5 mg/kg
Aijiaoheiye 333 0.012±0.001 0.036±0.004 0.050±0.012
Aijisuzhouqing 0.013±0.003 0.046±0.005 0.119±0.010
Hangzhouyoudonger 0.013±0.002 0.036±0.006 0.095±0.011
Qingyou 4 0.019±0.001 0.041±0.007 0.111±0.011
Changgeng 0.020±0.003 0.049±0.006 0.124±0.018
Zaoshenghuajing 0.020±0.004 0.041±0.007 0.138±0.013
Zhouyeheiyoudonger 0.021±0.003 0.048±0.008 0.199±0.011
Lifengqinggeng 0.022±0.002 0.042±0.006 0.137±0.012
Jinguanqingjiang 0.024±0.002 0.040±0.007 0.151±0.011
Xiawangqing 0.025±0.003 0.042±0.008 0.138±0.013
Sijiqingjiang 0.027±0.001 0.050±0.005 0.178±0.011
Gaohuaqinggeng 0.027±0.003 0.040±0.007 0.168±0.013
Shanghaiqing 0.030±0.005 0.047±0.004 0.258±0.016
a

Data are expressed as mean±SD (n=4)

3.3. Enrichment and translocation factors of 13 selected pakchoi cultivars

EF and TF factors are two important indexes to evaluate a plant’s ability to uptake and transport trace elements, respectively. Both EF and TF showed great variability among the 13 selected pakchoi cultivars, and the variability changed with Cd level in the soil (Fig. 3). The lowest EF under the three Cd treatments was found in Aijiaoheiye 333. In all treatments, the EFs of 10 cultivars of the selected 13 pakchoi cultivars were less than 1.0. These cultivars were Aijiaoheiye 333, Aijisuzhouqing, Hangzhouyoudonger, Qingyou 4, Changgeng, Zaoshenghuajing, Zhouyeheiyoudonger, Lifengqinggeng, Jinguanqingjiang, and Xiawangqing (Fig. 3a). The lowest TF was also found in Aijiaoheiye 333 (Fig. 3b); however, only seven pakchoi cultivars had TF less than 1.0 under the three Cd treatments. These cultivars were Aijiaoheiye 333, Aijisuzhouqing, Hangzhouyoudonger, Zaoshenghuajing, Zhouyeheiyoudonger, Jinguanqingjiang, and Sijiqingjiang (Fig. 3b). Thus six pakchoi cultivars, i.e., Aijiaoheiye 333, Aijisuzhouqing, Hangzhouyoudonger, Zaoshenghuajing, Zhouyeheiyoudonger and Jinguanqingjiang, with both EF and TF less than 1.0 were selected as PSCs and were then planted in field condition to confirm their low Cd accumulation potential.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Enrichment factor (EF) (a) and translocation factor (TF) (b) of the selected 13 pakchoi cultivars under three Cd treatments

3.4. Cd accumulation in pakchoi in field condition

Shoot Cd concentrations showed great variability among the six selected cultivars, and ranged from 0.039 to 1.080 mg/kg FW (Fig. 4). Cd concentrations in the shoots of Aijiaoheiye 333, Aijisuzhouqing, Hangzhouyoudonger, and Zaoshenghuajing were lower than 0.050 mg/kg, which is similar to the results from the pot-culture experiment. For Jinguanqingjiang and Zhouyeheiyoudonger, however, shoot Cd concentrations were 0.096 and 0.108 mg/kg, which exceeded the MPC of Cd in vegetables. The EFs in the six selected cultivars were all lower than 1.0; however, the TFs in Aijisuzhouqing, Jinguanqingjiang, and Zhouyeheiyoudonger were greater than 1.0. Therefore, only Aijiaoheiye 333, Hangzhouyoudonger, and Zaoshenghuajing were selected as Cd-PSCs based on the results of the field experiment.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Cd concentrations, translocation factor (TF), and enrichment factor (EF) in six pakchoi cultivars in the field experiment

4. Discussion

Under various treatments of Cd, all cultivars grew normally without showing any toxic symptoms. For most of the tested cultivars (70%), no difference was recorded in the shoot biomass, as compared with the control; this result indicates that they had considerable tolerance to Cd. The stimulating effect of Cd on the growth of shoots occurred at Cd rates of 2.5 mg/kg for five pakchoi cultivars (Fig. 1). Various mechanisms have been suggested to explain the stimulatory effect, and one of the explanations is that metal ions may serve as activators of enzyme(s) in cytokinin metabolism, which accelerates the growth of plants (Kaminek, 1992; Nyitrai et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2010). Secondly, low dose stress may cause changes in plant hormones and cytokinins, which regulate plant growth and development. Similar findings were reported in previous studies for a broad range of species (Chapman, 2002; Yu et al., 2006). Accordingly, farmers may not receive sufficiently early warning of Cd pollution or toxic concentrations of Cd in vegetables based on biomass change alone (Yu et al., 2006). In many developing countries, many agricultural lands have been polluted with Cd, and most of these contaminated lands are being used for agricultural production. Therefore, the selection and breeding of Cd-PSCs is a feasible and effective approach to reduce the influx of Cd to the human food chain, especially in slightly and moderately contaminated agriculture soils (Liu et al., 2010).

The uptake and accumulation of trace elements in plants vary greatly, not only among plant species but also among cultivars within the same species (Zhang et al., 2002; Stolt et al., 2006; Grant et al., 2008). Under the same Cd level, shoot Cd concentrations showed great variability among 50 tested pakchoi cultivars, and similar findings were reported on rice (Liu et al., 2003a; 2003b; Yu et al., 2006), wheat (Stolt et al., 2006), maize (Kurz et al., 1999), asparagus beans (Zhu et al., 2007), and Chinese cabbage (Liu et al., 2009; 2010). These results demonstrate that genetic variability for Cd accumulation exists within a species and this fact makes it possible to select and breed Cd-PSCs. In recent years, as an alternative choice, selection and breeding of PSCs has attracted much more attention and interest (Kurz et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2007; Zeng et al., 2008), and great success has been achieved on sunflower (Li et al., 1997; Miller et al., 2006), rice (He et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2007), durum wheat (Clarke et al., 2005; 2006), barley (Chen et al., 2007), maize (Kurz et al., 1999), and soybean (Arao et al., 2003). However, only a few studies have been done on selecting Cd-PSCs vegetables. Liu et al. (2009; 2010) identified Lvxing 70, New Beijing 3, and Fengyuanxin 3 as Cd-excluder genotypes from 40 Chinese cabbage genotypes. A screening standard is the basis for the screening of Cd-PSCs. However, there is not a unified screening standard up to now. Liu et al. (2009) recommended four standards for the identification of Cd-PSCs. Based on the literature and our research, we applied the following four criteria to select Cd-PSCs for food safety: (1) Cd concentration in the edible parts should be lower than the MPC; (2) EF<1.0; (3) TF<1.0; and (4) shoot biomass was not decreased significantly when growing in contaminated soils. In the pot experiment, when Cd concentration in shoots <0.050 mg/kg was used as a criterion, 14 pakchoi cultivars were selected as Cd-PSCs under the treatment of 1.0 mg/kg. When shoot biomass was taken into account, 13 pakchoi cultivars were selected as Cd-PSCs (Table 3). When EF<1.0 was used as a criterion, 10 cultivars could be judged as Cd-PSCs (Fig. 3a). When TF<1.0 was also used, only 6 pakchoi cultivars were regarded as Cd-PSCs (Fig. 3b). When tested in the field experiment, only Hangzhouyoudonger, Aijiaoheiye 333, and Zaoshenghuajing were regarded as Cd-PSCs. However, under the treatment of 2.5 mg/kg Cd, only Aijiaoheiye 333 could be considered as a Cd-PSC based on the shoot Cd concentration requirement of <0.050 mg/kg FW (Table 3). This result indicated that the screening of Cd-PSC is highly dependent on the level of soil Cd (Stolt et al., 2006). Overall, Hangzhouyoudonger, Aijiaoheiye 333, Zaoshenghuajing were selected as Cd-PSCs by both pot-culture experiment and field experiment, and these three pakchoi cultivars are therefore safe to consumers if they are planted in low Cd (≤1.2 mg/kg) contaminated soils.

Although an increasing number of studies demonstrate that cultivar selection can be effective in decreasing Cd concentration in crops, there are still obstacles to utilize this approach to produce low-Cd cultivars (Grant et al., 2008). Cd concentrations in plant tissues varied with Cd levels in soils, crop genotypes, and environmental factors. In this study, 98% (49/50) of the pakchoi cultivars had shoot Cd concentration >0.050 mg/kg when the soil Cd concentration was 2.5 mg/kg (Table 3); this result indicated that the selection of Cd-PSCs was not suitable in heavily Cd-contaminated soils. Physicochemical properties of the soils, such as cation exchange capacity (CEC), clay minerals and hydrous metal oxides, pH and buffering capacity, organic matter and moisture, can alter the phytoavailability of heavy metals in soil and thus affect Cd accumulation in crops. Further studies are therefore required to completely understand genotypic and soil properties, and their interaction mechanisms, to reduce Cd accumulation in pakchoi.

5. Conclusions

In this study, more than 70% of the tested cultivars produced greater or similar shoot biomass under Cd treatments; this result indicates that pakchoi has a considerable tolerance to soil Cd stress. Cd concentrations in the shoot varied significantly (P<0.05) between cultivars under two Cd treatments. Four parameters, i.e., Cd contents, EF, TF, and shoot biomass, were applied to select Cd-PSCs for food safety, and six pakchoi cultivars were selected as PSCs in the pot-culture experiment. Hangzhouyoudonger, Aijiaoheiye 333, and Zaoshenghuajing were finally identified as Cd-PSCs in the field culture experiment; these three pakchoi cultivars are safe to consumers if they are planted in low Cd (≤1.2 mg/kg) contaminated soils.

Footnotes

*

Project supported by the National High-Tech R & D Program (863) of China (No. 2009AA06Z316), the Science and Technology Commission of Zhejiang Province (No. 2008C33047), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China

References

  • 1.Alloway BJ. Heavy Metals in Soils. London: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1995. pp. 38–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arao T, Ae N, Sugiyama M, Takahashi M. Genotypic differences in cadmium uptake and distribution in soybeans. Plant Soil. 2003;251(2):247–253. doi: 10.1023/A:1023079819086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arduini I, Ercoli L, Mariotti M, Masoni A. Response of miscanthus to toxic cadmium applications during the period of maximum growth. Environ Exp Bot. 2006;55(1-2):29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baker AJM, Whiting SN. In search of the holy grail—a further step in understanding metal hyperaccumulation? New Phytol. 2002;155(1):1–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00449_1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chaney RL, Malik M, Li YM, Brown SL, Brewer EP, Angle JS, Baker AJM. Phytoremediation of soil metals. Curr Opin Biotech. 1997;8(3):279–284. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chapman PM. Ecological risk assessment (ERA) and hormesis. Sci Total Environ. 2002;288(1-2):131–140. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01120-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen F, Dong J, Wang F, Wu FB, Zhang GP, Li GM, Chen ZF, Chen JX, Wei K. Identification of barley genotypes with low grain Cd accumulation and its interaction with four microelements. Chemosphere. 2007;67(10):2082–2088. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clarke JM, McCaig TN, DePauw RM, Knox RE, Clarke FR, Fernandez MR. Strongfield durum wheat. Can J Plant Sci. 2005;85(3):651–654. doi: 10.4141/P04-119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clarke JM, McCaig TN, DePauw RM, Knox RE, Clarke FR, Fernandez MR. Registration of ‘Strongfield’ durum wheat. Crop Sci. 2006;46(5):2306–2307. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Das P, Samantaray S, Rout GR. Studies on cadmium toxicity in plants: a review. Environ Pollut. 1997;98(1):29–36. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(97)00110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dunbar KR, McLaughlin MJ, Reid RJ. The uptake and partitioning of cadmium in two cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) J Exp Bot. 2003;54(381):349–354. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grant CA, Clarke JM, Duguid S, Chaney RL. Selection and breeding of plant cultivars to minimize cadmium accumulation. Sci Total Environ. 2008;390(2-3):301–310. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo XF, Wei ZB, Wu QT, Qiu JR, Zhou JL. Cadmium and zinc accumulation in maizegrain as affected by cultivars and chemical fixation amendments. Pedosphere. 2011;21(5):650–656. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60167-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harrison HA. Carrot response to sludge application and bed type. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1986;11(2):211–215. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harrison HA, Staub JE. Effects of sludge, bed, and genotype on cucumber growth and elemental concentration of fruit and peel. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1986;11(2):205–211. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.He JY, Zhu C, Ren YF, Yan YP, Jiang D. Genotypic variation in grain cadmium concentration of lowland rice. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2006;169(5):711–716. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200525101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaminek M. Progress in cytokinin research. Trends Biotechnol. 1992;10:159–164. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(92)90204-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kurz H, Schulz R, Romheld V. Selection of cultivars to reduce the concentration of cadmium and thallium in food and fodder plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 1999;162(3):323–328. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2624(199906)162:3&#x0003c;323::AID-JPLN323&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li TQ, Yang XE, Lu LL, Islam E, He ZL. Effects of zinc and cadmium interactions on root morphology and metal translocation in a hyperaccumulating species under hydroponic conditions. J Hazard Mater. 2009;169(1-3):734–741. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li YM, Chaney RL, Schneiter AA, Miller JF, Elias EM, Hammond JJ. Screening for low grain cadmium phenotypes in sunflower, durum wheat and flax. Euphytica. 1997;94(1):23–30. doi: 10.1023/A:1002996405463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu JG, Liang JS, Li KQ, Zhang ZJ, Yu BY, Lu XL, Yang JC, Zhu QS. Correlations between cadmium and mineral nutrients in absorption and accumulation in various genotypes of rice under cadmium stress. Chemosphere. 2003;52(9):1467–1473. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00484-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu JG, Li KQ, Xu JK, Liang JS, Lu XL, Yang JC, Zhu QS. Interaction of Cd and five mineral nutrients for uptake and accumulation in different rice cultivars and genotypes. Field Crop Res. 2003;83(3):271–281. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00077-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu JG, Qian M, Cai GL, Yang JC, Zhu QS. Uptake and translocation of Cd in different rice cultivars and the relation with Cd accumulation in rice grain. J Hazard Mater. 2007;143(1-2):443–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu WT, Zhou QX, Sun YB, Liu R. Identification of Chinese cabbage genotypes with low cadmium accumulation for food safety. Environ Pollut. 2009;157(6):1961–1967. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu WT, Zhou QX, An J, Sun YB, Liu R. Variations in cadmium accumulation among Chinese cabbage cultivars and screening for Cd-safe cultivars. J Hazard Mater. 2010;173(1-3):737–743. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lu RK. Analytical Methods for Soils and Agricultural Chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press; 1999. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McGrath SP, Zhao FJ. Phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Curr Opin Biotech. 2003;14(3):277–282. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miller JF, Green CE, Li YM, Chaney RL. Registration of three low cadmium (HA 448, HA 449, and RHA 450) confection sunflower genetic stocks. Crop Sci. 2006;46(1):489–490. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.04-0012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.MHC (Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China) GB 2762-2005: Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods. Beijing, China: MHC; 2005. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nyitrai P, Bóka K, Gáspár L, Sárvári É, Keresztes Á. Rejuvenation of ageing bean leaves under the effect of low-dose stressors. Plant Biol. 2004;6(6):708–714. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ryan JA, Pahren HR, Lucas JB. Controlling cadmium in the human chain: a review and rationale based on health effects. Environ Res. 1982;28(2):251–302. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(82)90128-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Singh S, Eapen S, D′Souza SF. Cadmium accumulation and its influence on lipid peroxidation and antioxidative system in an aquatic plant, Bacopa monnieri L. Chemosphere. 2006;62(2):233–246. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stolt P, Asp H, Hultin S. Genetic variation in wheat cadmium accumulation on soils with different cadmium concentrations. J Agron Crop Sci. 2006;192(3):201–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00202.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thomas GM, Harrison HC. Genetic line effects on parameters influencing cadmium concentration in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) J Plant Nutr. 1991;14(9):953–962. doi: 10.1080/01904169109364255. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yu H, Wang JL, Fang W, Yuan JG, Yang ZY. Cadmium accumulation in different rice cultivars and screening for pollution-safe cultivars of rice. Sci Total Environ. 2006;370(2-3):302–309. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zeng FR, Mao Y, Cheng WD, Wu FB, Zhang GP. Genotypic and environmental variation in chromium, cadmium and lead concentrations in rice. Environ Pollut. 2008;153(2):309–314. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang GP, Fukami M, Sekimoto H. Influence of cadmium on mineral concentrations and yield components in wheat genotypes differing in Cd tolerance at seedling stage. Field Crops Res. 2002;77(2-3):93–98. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00061-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhou QX, Song YF. Principles, Methods of Contaminated Soil Remediation. Beijing: Science Press; 2004. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhu Y, Yu H, Wang JL, Fang W, Yuan JG, Yang ZY. Heavy metal accumulation of 24 asparagus bean cultivars grown in soil contaminated with Cd alone and with multiple metals (Cd, Pb, and Zn) J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(3):1045–1052. doi: 10.1021/jf062971p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhu YG, Chen SB, Yang JC. Effects of soil amendments on lead uptake by two vegetable crops from a lead-contaminated soil from Anhui, China. Environ Int. 2004;30(3):351–356. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B are provided here courtesy of Zhejiang University Press

RESOURCES