Abstract
Salinity was found to be the dominating contributor controlling bacterial community composition (BCC) and the abundance of Betaproteobacteria in the oligosaline Lake Bosten. The high percentage of unclassified bacteria inhabiting this unique habitat highlights the potential ecological importance of BCC in the early stage of lake salinization and eutrophication.
TEXT
Currently, most of our knowledge about lake bacterial ecology originates from lowland freshwater lake systems (9, 20, 28, 31, 36) and from saline and hypersaline habitats (8, 11, 29, 30, 33). We still know very little about the bacterial community compositions (BCC) in oligosaline lakes in arid regions. Lake Bosten was the largest inland freshwater lake in China before the 1960s. In the past 50 years, however, it has evolved from a freshwater to an oligosaline lake (2, 32). It represents an interesting ecosystem featuring a complex hydrology and an intrasystem salinity gradient, as well as a nutrition gradient from oligotrophic to mesotrophic (32).
To scrutinize the BCC and the related environmental factors of Lake Bosten in arid northwestern China, surface water (the top 50 cm) samples from 17 sites of the large-lake area (LLA; surface area, ≈950 km2, and mean depth, ≈7 m) and 6 sites of the small-lake area (SLA) were collected during 11 to 13 June 2010 (Fig. 1A). Biotic and abiotic variables of sampled water (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) were measured using standard methods (12). Then, a subsample of water (250 ml) for 16S rRNA gene analysis was filtered through a 0.2-μm-pore-size polycarbonate filter in the field, and genomic DNA was extracted (26, 35). For denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis, PCR amplification was carried out using a touchdown program with the primers 341F and 534R (19, 26).
Fig 1.
(A) Map of Lake Bosten, showing the sampling sites and the concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) in the surface water. Site annotations were derived from those of long-term monitoring sites used by the Institute of Lake Bosten. (B) Bacterial community composition of the six representative sampling sites in Lake Bosten. Numbers of sequenced clones and operational taxonomic units (OTUs, ≥97% identity) are indicated above the major taxonomic group distribution pie chart for each site. Clones affiliated with Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Chlorobi, Cyanobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Firmicutes, Planctomycetes, and unclassified bacteria are included in “Others.” L, liter.
Cluster analysis of environmental parameters, including total dissolved solids (TDS) revealed distinct spatial differences (Fig. 2A): samples with low salinity (TDS < 0.4 g liter−1) and high salinity (TDS > 1.1 g liter−1) were separated from each other and grouped into two respective arbitrarily defined clusters. Cluster analysis of BCC based on the DGGE data also revealed distinct spatial heterogeneity (Fig. 2B), and the dendrogram of BCC was similar to the matrices based on environmental parameters. Redundancy analysis (RDA) performed with the software CANOCO 4.5 (27) indicated that salinity (TDS) was the most important selector in Lake Bosten (Fig. 2C), solely accounting for 17.8% of the variation in BCC. Our results agree with previous findings that salinity is the major factor relating microbial communities (13, 18, 23, 30, 33).
Fig 2.
Similarity matrices and redundancy analysis (RDA) of the studied samples from Lake Bosten. (A) Water column chemistry and environmental parameters as determined by a similarity analysis (distance) in Primer-E. (B) Dendrogram of eubacterial communities generated from DGGE band presence-absence data using the software GelCompar II. Samples from both matrices can be grouped into two arbitrary clusters: cluster I presents high-TDS samples, and cluster II presents low-TDS samples. (C) RDA biplot showing different bacterial communities in relation to the four significant environmental factors. Site numbers are adjacent to the symbols. TDS, TP, Turb and DO refer to total dissolved solids, total phosphorus, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen, respectively.
To reveal the influence of salinity on bacterial taxonomic differentiation in detail, DNA extracted from six samples (sites 2, 7, 14, 15, 21, and 22) was selected for construction of the 16S rRNA gene clone libraries based on the DGGE profiles (6, 21, 25). In total, 99 operational taxonomic units (OTUs, ≥97% similarity) were acquired from 374 nonchimeric partial 16S rRNA gene sequences (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Betaproteobacteria were the most abundant bacterial group in the clone libraries of sites 2, 7, and 15, accounting for 45.9%, 48.4%, and 52.6% of the clones, respectively (Fig. 1B). Bacteroidetes accounted for 73.4% of the clones in the library of site 22. Consistent with our result, previous studies also showed that Betaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes are often the numerically dominant groups inhabiting the upper waters and organic particles in freshwater lakes (1, 9, 14, 20, 25, 36). However, detailed analysis of the BCC revealed high percentages of unidentified bacteria in the libraries (see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). For example, 62.7% of Betaproteobacteria and 82.1% of Bacteroidetes could not be affiliated to known bacteria at the genus level, indicating that potential new bacterial ribotypes inhabit the unique habitat of Lake Bosten.
Salinity also affects the abundance of Betaproteobacteria. The high betaproteobacterial abundance in freshwater habitats is in sharp contrast to their relative scarcity in oceans and hypersaline lakes (3, 30, 36), indicating the physiological barrier posed to this group by high salinity (5, 13, 17). Within the salinity gradient from 0.2 g liter−1 to 1.7 g liter−1 in Lake Bosten, however, we found that betaproteobacterial abundance was positively correlated with salinity (r = 0.954, P = 0.003, n = 6) (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). This is consistent with the findings of Betaproteobacteria peaking at salinities of around 1 g liter−1 in an estuary (4). In contrast, Wu et al. found a negative correlation of betaproteobacterial abundance with a salinity range from 0.2 g liter−1 to 3.6 g liter−1 in high mountain lakes (30). The differences may result from different levels of nutrients in Lake Bosten (mainly mesotrophic) and in the Tibetan Plateau lakes (oligotrophic). Bacterial growth in lakes is determined by the trophic status of the systems (7). In Lake Bosten, the increase in salinity is often coupled with increasing nutrient concentrations due to human activities (32, 34). And Betaproteobacteria have the ability to degrade complex organic macromolecules that come from input of pollutants (10, 20).
Statistical analysis demonstrated significant spatial heterogeneity of BCC in Lake Bosten, as determined by ∫-Libshuff comparisons (22, 24) of the six clone libraries (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Two main aspects have shaped and are still shaping the distribution patterns of salinity in Lake Bosten and, thus, structure the spatial heterogeneity of BCC. The first is continuous input of saline water from salt leaching in the process of agricultural production since the 1960s. About 220,000 tons of salt are discharged from the drainage channels (especially the Huangshui River) (Fig. 1A) on the northwestern side of Lake Bosten every year (34), which influenced the BCC in most of the sampling sites (except sites 13 and 14) in LLA. The second is the hydrology of Lake Bosten and the subsequent local environments of different sampling sites (32). Kaidu River supplies an average of 85% of the runoff into the lake. Divided by the Baolangsumu diversion gate (Fig. 1A), about 70% of the volume of the Kaidu River flows into the LLA through the eastern branch, and the water is removed by two pumping stations at the southwestern margin. Because of the short water residence time, the input of allochthonous riverine bacteria would be an important reason for the significant difference of BCC between site 14 and other sites (15, 16). The western branch of the Kaidu River flows into the reed-covered SLA (Fig. 1A). Accordingly, the BCC in site 22 seemed to be mainly influenced by the abundant submersed macrophytes (31). In addition to salinity, the anaerobic condition is considered to be the strongest determinant of BCC in site 21.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank staff at the Environmental Monitoring Station of the Environmental Protection Bureau of Bayingolin Mongolia Autonomous Prefecture for helping with sample collection and water chemical analysis and Peng Xing and Xiaoli Shi for facilitating phylogenetic tree analysis with ARB. We thank Sarah Poynton for linguistic improvements to our manuscript. We especially thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions.
This work was supported by the Special Environmental Research Funds for Public Welfare of the State Environmental Protection Administration (grant 200909048), the National Water Pollution Control and Management of Science and Technology Major Projects (grant 2009ZX07106-004), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 41171388).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 20 April 2012
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.
REFERENCES
- 1. Allgaier M, Grossart H-P. 2006. Seasonal dynamics and phylogenetic diversity of free-living and particle-associated bacterial communities in four lakes in northeastern Germany. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 45:115–128 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bai J, Chen X, Li J, Yang L, Fang H. 2011. Changes in the area of inland lakes in arid regions of central Asia during the past 30 years. Environ. Monit. Assess. 178:247–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Barberán A, Casamayor EO. 2010. Global phylogenetic community structure and beta-diversity patterns in surface bacterioplankton metacommunities. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 59:1–10 [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bouvier TC, del Giorgio PA. 2002. Compositional changes in free-living bacterial communities along a salinity gradient in two temperate estuaries. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47:453–470 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Caporaso JG, et al. 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:4516–4522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cole JR, et al. 2009. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D141–D145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Currie DJ. 1990. Large-scale variability and interactions among phytoplankton, bacterioplankton, and phosphorus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35:1437–1455 [Google Scholar]
- 8. Demergasso C, et al. 2008. Novelty and spatio-temporal heterogeneity in the bacterial diversity of hypersaline Lake Tebenquiche (Salar de Atacama). Extremophiles 12:491–504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Eiler A, Bertilsson S. 2004. Composition of freshwater bacterial communities associated with cyanobacterial blooms in four Swedish lakes. Environ. Microbiol. 6:1228–1243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hahn MW, Kasalický V, Jezbera J, Brandt U, Šimek K. 2010. Limnohabitans australis sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater pond, and emended description of the genus Limnohabitans. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60:2946–2950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jiang HC, et al. 2006. Microbial diversity in water and sediment of Lake Chaka, an athalassohaline lake in northwestern China. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:3832–3845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jin XC, Tu QY. 1990. The standard methods for observation and analysis of lake eutrophication, 2nd ed China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, China [Google Scholar]
- 13. Langenheder S, Kisand V, Wikner J, Tranvik LJ. 2003. Salinity as a structuring factor for the composition and performance of bacterioplankton degrading riverine DOC. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 45:189–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lemarchand C, et al. 2006. Community composition and activity of prokaryotes associated to detrital particles in two contrasting lake ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 57:442–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lindström ES, Bergström A-K. 2004. Influence of inlet bacteria on bacterioplankton assemblage composition in lakes of different hydraulic retention time. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49:125–136 [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lindström ES, Forslund M, Algesten G, Bergström AK. 2006. External control of bacterial community structure in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51:339–342 [Google Scholar]
- 17. Logares R, et al. 2009. Infrequent marine-freshwater transitions in the microbial world. Trends Microbiol. 17:414–422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lozupone CA, Knight R. 2007. Global patterns in bacterial diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:11436–11440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:695–700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Newton RJ, Jones SE, Eiler A, McMahon KD, Bertilsson S. 2011. A guide to the natural history of freshwater lake bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75:14–49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Newton RJ, Kent AD, Triplett EW, McMahon KD. 2006. Microbial community dynamics in a humic lake: differential persistence of common freshwater phylotypes. Environ. Microbiol. 8:956–970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Schloss PD, et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7537–7541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Silveira CB, et al. 2011. Influence of salinity on bacterioplankton communities from the Brazilian rain forest to the coastal Atlantic Ocean. PLoS One 6:e17789 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Singleton DR, Furlong MA, Rathbun SL, Whitman WB. 2001. Quantitative comparisons of 16S rRNA gene sequence libraries from environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4374–4376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Tang X, et al. 2010. Dynamics of organic-aggregate-associated bacterial communities and related environmental factors in Lake Taihu, a large eutrophic shallow lake in China. Limnol. Oceanogr. 55:469–480 [Google Scholar]
- 26. Tang X, Gao G, Zhu L, Chao J, Qin B. 2009. DNA extraction procedure affects organic-aggregate-attached bacterial community profiles from a shallow eutrophic lake. Can. J. Microbiol. 55:776–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5) Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY [Google Scholar]
- 28. Van der Gucht K, et al. 2005. Characterization of bacterial communities in four freshwater lakes differing in nutrient load and food web structure. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 53:205–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wang J, et al. 2011. Do patterns of bacterial diversity along salinity gradients differ from those observed for macroorganisms? PLoS One 6:e27597 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wu QL, Zwart G, Schauer M, Kamst-van Agterveld MP, Hahn MW. 2006. Bacterioplankton community composition along a salinity gradient of sixteen high-mountain lakes located on the Tibetan Plateau, China. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5478–5485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wu QL, et al. 2007. Submersed macrophytes play a key role in structuring bacterioplankton community composition in the large, shallow, subtropical Taihu Lake, China. Environ. Microbiol. 9:2765–2774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Xie G, Zhang J, Tang X, Cai Y, Gao G. 2011. Spatio-temporal heterogeneity of water quality and succession patterns in Lake Bosten during the past 50 years. J. Lake Sci. 23:988–998 (In Chinese.) [Google Scholar]
- 33. Xing P, Hahn MW, Wu QL. 2009. Low taxon richness of bacterioplankton in high-altitude lakes of the eastern Tibetan Plateau, with a predominance of Bacteroidetes and Synechococcus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7017–7025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zhang J. 2010. Eco-environment situation of Bosten Lake basin and its countermeasures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23:76–78. (In Chinese.) [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zhou J, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM. 1996. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:316–322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zwart G, Crump BC, Kampst-van Agterveld MP, Hagen F, Han SK. 2002. Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 28:141–155 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


