Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2012 May 24;68(Pt 6):632–637. doi: 10.1107/S1744309112017939

Structure of a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase from Bacillus anthracis

Jing Hou a,b, Kamila Wojciechowska a, Heping Zheng a,b, Maksymilian Chruszcz a,b, David R Cooper a,b, Marcin Cymborowski a,b, Tatiana Skarina b,c, Elena Gordon b,c, Haibin Luo a,b, Alexei Savchenko b,c, Wladek Minor a,b,*
PMCID: PMC3370898  PMID: 22684058

The crystal structure of a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase from B. anthracis strain ‘Ames Ancestor’ is reported.

Keywords: short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases, NADP, Bacillus anthracis

Abstract

The crystal structure of a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase from Bacillus anthracis strain ‘Ames Ancestor’ complexed with NADP has been determined and refined to 1.87 Å resolution. The structure of the enzyme consists of a Rossmann fold composed of seven parallel β-strands sandwiched by three α-­helices on each side. An NADP molecule from an endogenous source is bound in the conserved binding pocket in the syn conformation. The loop region responsible for binding another substrate forms two perpendicular short helices connected by a sharp turn.

1. Introduction  

Bacillus anthracis is a Gram-positive bacterium that can potentially cause the lethal disease anthrax in humans and animals, and also has the potential to be used as a biological weapon (Bouzianas, 2010). B. anthracis is classified by the NIAID as a Category A priority pathogen and is one of the target organisms of the Center of Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases (CSGID; Anderson, 2009). The CSGID selected this target because it is conserved and believed to be essential for survival and involved in sporulation.

The BA1847 gene was cloned from the genome of B. anthracis strain ‘Ames Ancestor’. It encodes a protein consisting of 252 amino acids (UniProt Q81S30) that we will refer to as BA1847 in this manuscript. It contains the typical motifs of an oxidoreductase of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily, which includes NAD(H)- or NADP(H)-dependent reductases with a wide variety of substrates (Kallberg et al., 2002, 2010). Members of the SDR superfamily are ubiquitous in all kingdoms of life (Jörnvall et al., 1999). More than 300 SDR families have been identified, among which about 50% are found only in bacteria (Kallberg et al., 2010). Substrates for SDRs include many important metabolites such as sugars and their derivatives in carbohydrate metabolism (Koropatkin & Holden, 2005; Zhang et al., 2009), steroids in signal transduction (Benach et al., 2002; Svegelj et al., 2011) and keto-acyl-(acyl carrier proteins) and enoyl-acyl-(acyl carrier proteins) in fatty-acid synthesis (Lee et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010; Price et al., 2004; Zaccai et al., 2008). SDRs usually consist of two domains: a coenzyme-binding domain and a substrate-binding domain. While the coenzyme-binding domain is usually conserved, the substrate-binding domain normally varies and determines the substrate specificity (Kavanagh et al., 2008).

Although the biological substrate of BA1847 is unknown, BLAST searches (Altschul et al., 1990) using the NCBI nonredundant protein database showed that the protein is highly conserved among the Bacillus genus, with greater than 90% identity among different species of Bacillus, including B. anthracis, B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, B. mycoides and B. pseudomycoides, indicating that this protein might play an indispensible role. Searching the B. anthracis genome (http://hamap.expasy.org/proteomes/BACAN.html) revealed that 21 genes are annotated as short-chain dehydrogenases/oxido­reductases. The substrate specificities for most of them are unknown, except for a 3-keto-acyl-(acyl carrier protein) reductase (BaFabG; PDB entry 2uvd; Zaccai et al., 2008), which shares 38% sequence identity with BA1847.

In this paper, we report the crystal structure of BA1847 in complex with NADP. The structure reveals that BA1847 has a Rossmann fold with an endogenous NADP bound to the conserved binding pocket. The binding of NADP also induces the substrate-binding loop to form an ordered helix–turn–helix motif.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Cloning, expression and purification of BA1847  

The ORF of the short-chain dehydrogenase BA1847 (CSGID target ID IDP02573, gene locus GBAA1847, gi:47527139, accession No. YP_018488) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from genomic DNA of B. anthracis strain ‘Ames Ancestor’ using the forward primer 5′-TACTTCCAATCCAATGCGATGTTAAAAG­GAAAAGTAGCATTA-3′ and the reverse primer 5′-TTATCCAC­TTCCAATGTTATAAACAAGATCCTCCGCTA-3′. The gene was cloned into pMCSG7 plasmid encoding an N-terminal tobacco etch virus protease-cleavable hexahistidine tag (MHHHHHHSSGVD­LGTENLYFQSNA; Stols et al., 2002) using ligation-independent cloning. The recombinant protein was overexpressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21 (Codon Plus)-RIPL. The cells were grown in M9 minimal medium supplemented with selenomethionine (SeMet) at 310 K until the OD600 reached 1.0. Protein expression was then induced by the addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalacto­pyranoside (IPTG). The induced cells were cultured at 293 K for a further 16–18 h.

The harvested cells were sonicated in lysis buffer consisting of 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 5 mM imidazole supplemented with non-EDTA protease-inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and clarified by centrifugation. The supernatant was applied onto Ni–NTA affinity resin (Qiagen, USA) pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer and washed with buffer consisting of 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 30 mM imidazole. The His-tagged protein was eluted with 250 mM imidazole.

Recombinant His-tagged TEV protease (1 mg) was added to 40 mg eluted protein to cleave the hexahistidine tag from BA1847 and was incubated at 277 K overnight. The cleaved protein solution was dialyzed against 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol and applied onto an Ni–NTA column to remove the TEV, uncleaved protein and free hexahistidine tag from recombinant BA1847. The flowthrough from the second Ni–NTA column was concentrated using an Amicon Ultra 30K concentrator (Millipore, USA), applied onto a Superdex G200 gel-filtration column attached to an ÄKTA purification system (GE Healthcare, USA) and eluted with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol. BA1847 eluted as a single peak at an elution volume consistent with a tetramer and appeared as a single band of ∼27 kDa on SDS–PAGE with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. Dynamic light-scattering analysis was also consistent with a tetramer in solution (data not shown). The purified protein was stored in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol.

2.2. Crystallization  

Crystallization was performed by hanging-drop vapour diffusion. 1 µl of BA1847 at 11.5 mg ml−1 was mixed with an equal volume of 0.1 M MES pH 6.5, 0.2 M ammonium sulfate, 20–30%(w/v) PEG 5000 MME and equilibrated against the same buffer at 289 K. Square-plate-shaped crystals appeared the next day and reached their largest size in two weeks. 40%(w/v) PEG 5000 MME in 0.1 M MES pH 6.5, 0.2 M ammonium sulfate was used as a cryoprotectant. The crystals were then flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen.

2.3. Data collection, structure determination and refinement  

Data were collected at the Structural Biology Center (Rosenbaum et al., 2006) at the Advanced Photon Source in Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne, Illinois, USA). Data collection on beamline 19ID was facilitated by the HKL-3000 program suite (Minor et al., 2006), which incorporates HKL-2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) for data processing and scaling. Data were collected at a single wavelength at 100 K and the structure was determined and refined by HKL-3000, which utilized the following programs during the course of the BA1847 project: SHELXD, SHELXE (Sheldrick, 2008, 2010), DM (Cowtan & Main, 1993), ARP/wARP (Perrakis et al., 1999), CCP4 (Winn et al., 2011), SOLVE (Terwilliger & Berendzen, 1999), RESOLVE (Terwilliger, 2004) and REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011). 12 seleniums were located within the asymmetric unit and a partial model was built using the SAD phases during data collection. This partial model was used for further refinement and manual model building/adjustments. The NCS symmetry was utilized for both phase improvement and refinement. The merged Bijvoet pairs were used for refinement and were deposited in the PDB. Manual model building and refinement were performed in Coot (Emsley & Cowtan, 2004). MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010) and ADIT (Yang et al., 2004) were used for structure validation. The statistics of data collection and structure determination are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Diffraction data and refinement statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

Data collection
 Wavelength (Å) 0.9793
 Space group C2221
 Unit-cell parameters (Å) a = 98.7, b = 104.8, c = 103.7
 Resolution (Å) 42.00–1.87 (1.92–1.87)
 No. of unique reflections 44201 (2186)
 Completeness (%) 100.0 (100.0)
 Multiplicity 7.3 (7.0)
 Mean I/σ(I) 46.3 (2.9)
 Molecules in asymmetric unit 2
 Matthews coefficient (Å3 Da−1) 2.43
 Solvent content (%) 49.33
Rmerge (%) 10.0 (68.6)
Structure refinement
 Resolution range (Å) 42.00–1.87 (1.92–1.87)
Rwork/Rfree (%) 16.6/20.7 (21.5/26.6)
 No. of residues/protein atoms 510/3826
 No. of water atoms 288
Average B factors (Å2)
 Main chain 14.66
 Side chains 17.69
 Overall 17.17
 Waters 23.26
 Ligands/ion 36.58
Ramachandran plot (%)
 Most favored 98.00
 Allowed 2.00
 Disallowed 0.00
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.016
 Bond angles (°) 1.557

The coordinates and experimental structure factors were deposited in the PDB with accession code 3icc and the diffraction images are available at the CSGID website (http://www.csgid.org).

2.4. Catalytic assays for substrate screening  

Substrate screening was performed using β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2′-phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt hydrate (NADPH) and potential substrates inferred from the DALI search (Holm & Rosenström, 2010) results, such as single sugars, tropinone, gluconate, hydroxysteroids, alcohols and acetoacetyl coenzyme A (as a substitute for acetoacetyl-acyl carrier protein). Enzymatic activities were measured by monitoring the decrease in absorbance of NADPH at 340 nm at 298 K in 96-well UV-transmitting half-area microplates (Corning) using a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax, Molecular Devices). Assays were performed in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5 and 200 mM NaCl in a total volume of 80 µl with 1.0–10 nmol BA1847, 400 µM NADPH and 0.1–10 mM substrate.

3. Results and discussion  

3.1. Overall structure and putative substrate-binding site  

The crystal structure of BA1847 contains a dimer in the asymmetric unit with a core typical of short-chain dehydrogenases (SDRs). The overall structures of the monomers are very similar. Least-squares superposition of Cα atoms gives an r.m.s. deviation of 0.27 Å, with the largest deviation observed for the fragment 193–198 (r.m.s. deviation of 1.95 Å). Each monomer has a Rossmann fold (Rao & Rossmann, 1973) with seven parallel β-strands sandwiched between α1, α2 and α8 on one side and α3, α4 and α5 on the other side (Fig. 1). Substrate binding is mediated by two short helices (α6 and α7) that serve as a lid for the active site.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

BA1847 monomer shown in cartoon representation. α-Helices are shown in cyan, β-strands in pale green and loops in gray. The NADP molecule is shown in ball-and-stick representation with C atoms in magenta, N atoms in blue, O atoms in red and P atoms in orange. All figures were generated using PyMOL (Schrodinger LLC).

A DALI search (Holm & Rosenström, 2010) was performed using the BA1847 monomer. It identified 209 similar structures with Z score > 15 and r.m.s.d. < 2.0 Å. The sequence identities between BA1847 and these proteins range between 20 and 38%. These proteins have very different substrate specificities; the most popular substrates are sugars and their derivatives, followed by 3-oxoacyl-ACP and hydroxy­steroids.

The structure of BA1847 has the highest sequence identity (38%) and the lowest r.m.s.d. (1.4 Å for 244 Cα atoms) to that of 3-keto-acyl-(acyl carrier protein) reductase from B. anthracis (BaFabG; PDB entry 2uvd; Zaccai et al., 2008; Fig. 2). These two proteins have almost identical N-terminal sequences and well conserved NADP(H)-binding motifs, but the differences described below suggest different functions for the two proteins. It has been hypothesized that acyl carrier protein (ACP) recognizes its functional partners in fatty-acid syntheses, including 3-keto-acyl-(acyl carrier protein) reductase, through interactions between its highly electronegative/hydrophobic helix α2 and the electropositive/hydrophobic surface of its partner enzymes (Zhang et al., 2003). In BaFabG, the ACP-binding residues Arg132 and Arg175 are located at the C-terminal ends of α4 and α5, with both side chains stretching out into the solvent (Zhang et al., 2003). In BA1847, however, major conformational differences are observed for the corresponding residues (Arg135 and Arg179) that limit the solvent exposure of their side chains. A three-residue deletion shortens the α4 helix and positions the Arg135 side chain in the vicinity of the loop following α3. The position corresponding to the main chain of Arg132 in BaFabG is occupied by the side chain of an aspartic acid (Asp136), which forms hydrogen bonds and a salt bridge to the Arg179 side chain. Additional hydrogen bonding is also found between the Arg179 side chain and the Leu134 backbone carbonyl, which is exposed as a result of the deletion. These features in BA1847 might make the electrostatics/hydrophobicity of this area different from that of BaFabG, thus diminishing the affinity towards ACP. Thus, the biological substrate of BA1847 is unlikely to be 3-­ketoacyl-ACP. This may explain why it lacks activity toward aceto­acetyl coenzyme A, which is used as a substitute for 3-oxoacyl-ACP in catalytic activity assays (Karmodiya & Surolia, 2006; Silva et al., 2006).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of the crystal structures of BA1847 and some other representative short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases. The NADP molecule from 3icc is shown in ball-and-stick mode as a reference. 3icc (BA1847 from B. anthracis), green; 2uvd [3-­keto-acyl-(acyl carrier protein) reductase from B. anthracis; Zaccai et al., 2008], cyan; 1ipf (tropinone reductase II from Datura stramonium; Yamashita et al., 2003), red; 1vl8 (gluconate 5-dehydrogenase from Thermotoga maritima; Joint Center for Structural Genomics, unpublished work), yellow; 1g0n (trihydroxynaphthalene reductase from Magnaporthe grisea; Liao et al., 2001), orange; 1fmc (7-α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from E. coli; Tanaka et al., 1996), slate; 1edo [3-­keto-acyl-(acyl carrier protein) reductase from Brassica napus; Fisher et al., 2000], salmon; 1gco (glucose dehydrogenase from B. megaterium; Yamamoto et al., 2001), pink; 1q7b [3-keto-acyl-(acyl carrier protein) reductase from E. coli; Price et al., 2004], brown.

The crystal structure of BA1847 in complex with NADP is also very similar to those of tropinone reductase (sequence identity 30%, Z = 35.8; Yamashita et al., 2003), trihydroxynaphthalene reductase (sequence identity 37%, Z = 35.7; Liao et al., 2001), 7-α-hydroxy­steroid dehydrogenase (sequence identity 35%, Z = 35.5; Benach et al., 2002), glucose dehydrogenase (sequence identity 32%, Z = 35; Yamamoto et al., 2001) and many more (Fig. 2). Substrate screening was performed using tropinone, gluconate, hydroxysteroid, glucose and many other potential substrates as inferred from the DALI results. Nevertheless, BA1847 showed no catalytic activity in these assays, so the actual substrate is likely to be unique, yet still remains unknown.

3.2. Catalytic tetrad  

NADP(H)-dependent SDRs have a characteristic catalytic tetrad in their active site. In BA1847, this catalytic tetrad forms a conformation ready for catalysis with residues Asn119 (α4 C-terminus), Ser145 (β5 C-terminus), Tyr158 (α5 N-terminus) and Lys162 (in the middle of α5) (Fig. 3). The presence of NADP in the binding pocket might account for the formation of the active state for the catalytic tetrad. This conformational change was demonstrated in structures determined previously for some other SDR family members. In these proteins, residues corresponding to Ser145, Tyr158 and Lys162 reside far away from the binding pocket in the absence of cofactor (Cohen-Gonsaud et al., 2002, 2005; Price et al., 2001), while NADP(H) binding induces conformational transition into the active state (Price et al., 2004; Yamazawa et al., 2011).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Interaction between BA1847 and NADP. Relevant amino acids are shown in stick representation, while NADP is shown in ball-and-stick representation. The C atoms of amino acids in the binding pocket (except for the catalytic tetrad) are shown in cyan and the C atoms of the catalytic tetrad (Asn119, Ser145, Tyr158 and Lys162) are shown in gold. The C atoms of the NADP molecule are shown in magenta. N atoms are shown in blue, O atoms in red and P atoms in orange. Hydrogen bonds are shown as red dashed lines. Water molecules are not shown for clarity.

3.3. NADP-binding site  

NADP molecules were found in the BA1847 crystal structure, even though no NADP was added to the protein-sample solution during purification or crystallization. There is one NADP in each monomer and both NADP molecules within the asymmetric unit are bound in the same manner. However, only the NADP in monomer B has full occupancy, and this will serve as the basis for description of the NADP-binding mode. Detailed interactions between BA1847 and the cofactor NADP in the crystal structure are shown in Fig. 3.

The binding motif for NADP is well conserved in the SDR superfamily and the binding mode seen here is very similar to that observed in other family members (Kallberg et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2009; Svegelj et al., 2011; Price et al., 2004; Yamashita et al., 2003; Yamazawa et al., 2011). The binding pocket for the adenine ring is mainly formed by residues from the N-terminal part of the protein, while the binding of the nicotinamide moiety involves the catalytic tetrad and the C-­terminal part of the protein. The NADP adapts a syn conformation. The cleft surrounded by the β1–α1, β2–α2, β3–α3 and β4–α4 loops and helix α4 accommodates the adenine ring and its associated ribose. One side of the adenine ring faces the hydrophobic patch formed by the side chains of Leu63, Ala96 and Val118. On the other side of the adenine ring there are water-mediated hydrogen bonds between the Oδ1 atom of Asn37 and O3X of NADP. Two direct hydrogen bonds play crucial roles in holding the adenine ring in place. One is between N6A of NADP and the O∊2 atom of Glu64 and the other is between the ring N1 atom of NADP and the amide N atom of Leu63.

There are extensive hydrophilic interactions between the co­enzyme and the N-terminal conserved NADP(H)-binding motif (TGASRGIG). The Oγ atom of Ser13 forms two hydrogen bonds to the ribose O3B atom and the ribose 2′-phosphate O1X atom. This phosphate also forms two hydrogen bonds to the amide N atoms of Asn37 and Arg38 and forms a salt bridge and a hydrogen bond to the side chains of Arg14 and Arg38. The two pyrophosphate groups are secured by both direct and water-mediated hydrogen bonds to the amide N atoms of Ile16, Gly15 and Met195, Nδ2 of Asn95, Oγ1 of Thr193 and the carbonyl O atom of Gly97. The hydroxyl groups on the nicotinamide-associated ribose form direct hydrogen bonds to the carbonyl O atom of Asn95, the hydroxyl of Tyr158 and the N atom of Lys162. The direct interactions between residues in the catalytic tetrad (Tyr158 and Lys162) and NADP are consistent with the active catalytic state of the enzyme (Price et al., 2004; Yamazawa et al., 2011).

Comparison with other family members suggests that residues 192–212 are responsible for substrate binding and that the conserved motif Pro188-Gly189 at the end of β7 might serve as a conformational switch for substrate binding. The presence of NADP is also critical for stabilization of the conformation of the substrate-binding loop and this region is disordered in many SDRs without a ligand (Yamazawa et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2006). Binding of cofactor usually induces this region to form an ordered structure (Yamazawa et al., 2011). In the crystal structure of BA1847 the nicotinamide ring is stacked in the clamp formed between the Pro188 and Met195 side chains (Fig. 2). The O atom on the nicotinamide forms three hydrogen bonds to the carbonyl O atom of Gly189, the amide N atom of Val191 and Oδ2 of Asn196. The N atom of nicotinamide forms two hydrogen bonds to the carbonyl O atom of Val191 and Oγ1 of Thr193. O1N of NADP forms a hydrogen bond to Oγ1 of Thr193. There are two water-mediated hydrogen bonds between the pyrophosphate O atoms and both the O and the N atoms of Asp194. These intensive interactions between the nicotinamide ring of NADP and the residues in the substrate-binding loop help these residues to stay ordered (Fig. 3). In monomer B of the crystal structure of BA1847, fragments 197–201 and 203–211 form two perpendicular α-helices which are connected by a sharp turn (Fig. 1), while in monomer A only fragment 203–211 forms an α-helix. The difference in the local structure of the substrate-binding pocket is probably a consequence of the differing NADP occupancies in the two monomers. The NADP molecule in monomer B is modelled with full occupancy, while in monomer A the occupancy of the NADP molecule is 50%.

3.4. Tetramer of BA1847  

The biological assembly of BA1847 is a tetramer, as reported for most other members of the SDR superfamily (Zhang et al., 2009; Zaccai et al., 2008; Yamashita et al., 2003). Although only a dimer is present in the asymmetric unit, the tetrameric biological unit can be generated by a crystallographic symmetry operation (Fig. 4). PDBePISA (Krissinel & Henrick, 2007) also indicated that a tetrameric quaternary structure is the functional unit. Two symmetrical dimerization interfaces are responsible for the formation of this tetramer, both of which are structurally conserved in all SDR superfamily members. The first interface involves helices α4 and α5 from two neighboring symmetry-related monomers. These helices run antiparallel to each other, which in turn forms a four-helix bundle. The second interface is formed mainly between the antiparallel α8 helices and β7 strands from each monomer within the asymmetric unit.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The tetrameric assembly of BA1847. Each monomer is shown in a different color, with symmetry-related monomers in related shading. NADP molecules are shown in stick representation. Side chains of residues in the dimer interfaces are shown in ball-and-stick representation, with C atoms in interface 1 in yellow and those in interface 2 in gray.

In the first interface, hydrophobic interactions play a dominant role. Helix α4 (Ile104, Phe112, Val116, Phe124, Phe125 and Leu131) forms extensive hydrophobic interactions with the same set of residues from α4′ (where α4′ indicates the counterpart segment from the symmetry-related molecule), while helix α5 (Leu156, Ala157, Met160, Gly163, Ala164, Met168 and Phe170) forms interactions with α5′ in a similar manner. Hydrophilic interactions also contribute to this interface. There is a salt bridge between Lys121 of one monomer and Glu109 and Asp113 of the other monomer. A hydrogen-bond network is formed between residues from one monomer (Ile104, Glu105, Thr107, Gln128, Ser151, Thr171 and Gln175) and their counterpart residues in the other monomer (Gln128, Gln175, Ile104, Thr107, Thr171, Ser151 and Glu105).

A second interface is stabilized by interactions between the C-­terminal parts of two monomers. Hydrogen-bonding and salt-bridge interactions are mostly formed by polar residues located on helix α8 and the loops before and after helix α8. These include the salt bridge and hydrogen bonds formed between Arg237 on loop α8–β7 and Asp226 in α8′, between Arg217 on loop α6–α8 and Asp223 in α8′, and between the N atom of Gly248 and the O atom of Trp238 in the neighboring monomer. Three groups of hydrophobic interactions contribute to the second interface: (i) the rings of the two Phe230 residues in α8; (ii) the indole ring of Trp238, which protrudes into the pocket formed by residues Gly219 and Gly248 and the side chains of Phe215, Arg217, Glu220, Asp226, Val246 and Ser247 from the neighboring monomer; and (iii) the nonpolar residues on β7, which interact with those in the other monomer. Arg23 in the N-­terminus also contributes to this second interface. The N atoms of its guanidine group both form hydrogen bonds and a salt bridge with the side-chain O atoms of Asp235.

Supplementary Material

PDB reference: short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase, 3icc

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services under Contract No. HHSN272200700058C. The results shown in this report are derived from work performed at Argonne National Laboratory at the Structural Biology Centre of the Advanced Photon Source. Argonne is operated by University of Chicago Argonne LLC for the US Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357.

References

  1. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. (1990). J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Anderson, W. F. (2009). Infect. Disord. Drug Targets, 9, 507–517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Benach, J., Filling, C., Oppermann, U. C., Roversi, P., Bricogne, G., Berndt, K. D., Jörnvall, H. & Ladenstein, R. (2002). Biochemistry, 41, 14659–14668. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Bouzianas, D. G. (2010). J. Med. Chem. 53, 4305–4331. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 12–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Cohen-Gonsaud, M., Ducasse, S., Hoh, F., Zerbib, D., Labesse, G. & Quemard, A. (2002). J. Mol. Biol. 320, 249–261. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Cohen-Gonsaud, M., Ducasse-Cabanot, S., Quemard, A. & Labesse, G. (2005). Proteins, 60, 392–400. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Cowtan, K. D. & Main, P. (1993). Acta Cryst. D49, 148–157. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2126–2132. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Fisher, M., Kroon, J. T., Martindale, W., Stuitje, A. R., Slabas, A. R. & Rafferty, J. B. (2000). Structure Fold. Des. 8, 339–347. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Holm, L. & Rosenström, P. (2010). Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545–W549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Jörnvall, H., Höög, J. O. & Persson, B. (1999). FEBS Lett. 445, 261–264. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Kallberg, Y., Oppermann, U., Jörnvall, H. & Persson, B. (2002). Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 4409–4417. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Kallberg, Y., Oppermann, U. & Persson, B. (2010). FEBS J. 277, 2375–2386. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Karmodiya, K. & Surolia, N. (2006). FEBS J. 273, 4093–4103. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Kavanagh, K. L., Jörnvall, H., Persson, B. & Oppermann, U. (2008). Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 3895–3906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Kim, K.-H., Ha, B. H., Kim, S. J., Hong, S. K., Hwang, K. Y. & Kim, E. E. (2010). J. Mol. Biol. 406, 403–415. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Koropatkin, N. M. & Holden, H. M. (2005). Acta Cryst. D61, 365–373. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. (2007). J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Lee, H. H., Moon, J. & Suh, S. W. (2007). Proteins, 69, 691–694. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Liao, D., Basarab, G. S., Gatenby, A. A., Valent, B. & Jordan, D. B. (2001). Structure, 9, 19–27. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Minor, W., Cymborowski, M., Otwinowski, Z. & Chruszcz, M. (2006). Acta Cryst. D62, 859–866. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Perrakis, A., Morris, R. & Lamzin, V. S. (1999). Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 458–463. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Price, A. C., Zhang, Y. M., Rock, C. O. & White, S. W. (2001). Biochemistry, 40, 12772–12781. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Price, A. C., Zhang, Y. M., Rock, C. O. & White, S. W. (2004). Structure, 12, 417–428. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Rao, S. T. & Rossmann, M. G. (1973). J. Mol. Biol. 76, 241–256. [DOI] [PubMed]
  29. Rosenbaum, G. et al. (2006). J. Synchrotron Rad. 13, 30–45.
  30. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  31. Sheldrick, G. M. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 479–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  32. Silva, R. G., de Carvalho, L. P., Blanchard, J. S., Santos, D. S. & Basso, L. A. (2006). Biochemistry, 45, 13064–13073. [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Stols, L., Gu, M., Dieckman, L., Raffen, R., Collart, F. R. & Donnelly, M. I. (2002). Protein Expr. Purif. 25, 8–15. [DOI] [PubMed]
  34. Svegelj, M. B., Stojan, J. & Rižner, T. L. (2011). J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 129, 92–98. [DOI] [PubMed]
  35. Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Tanabe, T., Yoshimoto, T., Tsuru, D. & Mitsui, Y. (1996). Biochemistry, 35, 7715-7730 [DOI] [PubMed]
  36. Tang, Y., Lee, H. Y., Tang, Y., Kim, C.-Y., Mathews, I. & Khosla, C. (2006). Biochemistry, 45, 14085–14093. [DOI] [PubMed]
  37. Terwilliger, T. (2004). J. Synchrotron Rad. 11, 49–52. [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Terwilliger, T. C. & Berendzen, J. (1999). Acta Cryst. D55, 849–861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  39. Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.
  40. Yamamoto, K., Kurisu, G., Kusunoki, M., Tabata, S., Urabe, I. & Osaki, S. (2001). J. Biochem. 129, 303–312. [DOI] [PubMed]
  41. Yamashita, A., Endo, M., Higashi, T., Nakatsu, T., Yamada, Y., Oda, J. & Kato, H. (2003). Biochemistry, 42, 5566–5573. [DOI] [PubMed]
  42. Yamazawa, R., Nakajima, Y., Mushiake, K., Yoshimoto, T. & Ito, K. (2011). J. Biochem. 149, 701–712. [DOI] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, H., Guranovic, V., Dutta, S., Feng, Z., Berman, H. M. & Westbrook, J. D. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 1833–1839. [DOI] [PubMed]
  44. Zaccai, N. R., Carter, L. G., Berrow, N. S., Sainsbury, S., Nettleship, J. E., Walter, T. S., Harlos, K., Owens, R. J., Wilson, K. S., Stuart, D. I. & Esnouf, R. M. (2008). Proteins, 70, 562–567. [DOI] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, Q., Peng, H., Gao, F., Liu, Y., Cheng, H., Thompson, J. & Gao, G. F. (2009). Protein Sci. 18, 294–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, Y.-M., Wu, B., Zheng, J. & Rock, C. O. (2003). J. Biol. Chem. 278, 52935–52943. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

PDB reference: short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase, 3icc


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES