Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2012 May 23;68(Pt 6):671–674. doi: 10.1107/S1744309112015862

Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of Plasmodium falciparum GTP:AMP phosphotransferase

Alan W L Law a, Julien Lescar b,c, Quan Hao a, Masayo Kotaka a,*
PMCID: PMC3370907  PMID: 22684067

P. falciparum GTP:AMP phosphotransferase was expressed in E. coli, purified and crystallized. An X-ray diffraction data set was collected to a resolution of 2.90 Å.

Keywords: GTP:AMP phosphotransferase, Plasmodium falciparum, adenylate kinases

Abstract

Adenylate kinases (AKs) are phosphotransferase enzymes that catalyze the interconversion of adenine nucleotides, thereby playing an important role in energy metabolism. In Plasmodium falciparum, three AK isoforms, namely PfAK1, PfAK2 and GTP:AMP phosphotransferase (PfGAK), have been identified. While PfAK1 and PfAK2 catalyse the conversion of ATP and AMP to two molecules of ADP, PfGAK exhibits a substrate preference for GTP and AMP and does not accept ATP as a substrate. PfGAK was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli and purified using two-step chromatography. Brown hexagonal crystals of PfGAK were obtained and a preliminary diffraction analysis was performed. X-ray diffraction data for a single PfGAK crystal were processed to 2.9 Å resolution in space group P3121 or P3221, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 123.49, c = 180.82 Å, α = β = 90, γ = 120°.

1. Introduction  

Malaria is a parasitic infectious disease that is widespread in tropical and subtropical regions and affects 350–500 million people a year (Wells & Poll, 2010; Hay et al., 2004). Amongst the five Plasmodium species that account for human infections (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale and P. knowlesi), P. falciparum is the most virulent (World Health Organization, 2009; Sinclair et al., 2009). With the increasing drug resistance of the parasite and no vaccine in sight, new chemotherapeutic approaches are required (Petersen et al., 2011).

Adenylate kinases (AKs) are cell energy regulators that play important roles in complex phosphotransfer networks that control intracellular ATP-production processes (Dzeja et al., 2002; Dzeja & Terzic, 2003). In many organisms these enzymes participate in a variety of physiological functions, such as muscle contraction and cell motility (Hancock et al., 2006; Cao et al., 2006). The malaria parasite Plasmodium has a high rate of ATP turnover, as merozoite invasion involves high-performance ATP-dependent actomyosin motors and the mature parasite has to supply the host erythrocytes with ATP (Webster & Whaun, 1981). These processes require AKs, making them attractive antimalarial targets.

AKs belong to the nucleotide monophosphate (NMP) kinase superfamily. They exhibit a typical α/β protein fold consisting of a CORE ATP-binding domain with a central five-stranded β-sheet surrounded by α-helices, a smaller NMP-binding domain composed of three α-helices and a LID domain of flexible residues covering the phosphate-donor site (Yan & Tsai, 1999). There are two forms of AKs, the short form and the long form, which differ by a 20–30 amino-acid-residue insertion in the LID domain (Müller & Schulz, 1992). Mammalian AKs are short AKs, while those from bacteria, yeast and mitochondria are long AKs. Different oligomeric forms are observed for AKs: eubacterial AKs are monomeric, while archaebacterial AKs exist in a trimeric form (Vonrhein et al., 1998). In addition, dimeric forms of AK have also been reported (Perrier et al., 1998).

Three isoforms of AK have been identified in P. falciparum, all of which belong to the long form. Of these isoforms of P. falciparum AK, PfAK1 and PfAK2 specifically bind AMP and favour ATP over other nucleotide triphosphates, whereas GTP:AMP phosphotrans­ferase (PfGAK) exhibits a substrate preference for GTP and AMP (Ulschmid et al., 2004). PfGAK corresponds to mammalian AK3 and shares 25% sequence identity with human AK3. While human AK3 accepts both GTP and ATP as phosphate donors, PfGAK specifically utilizes only GTP for phosphate transfer (Ulschmid et al., 2004). In addition, it has been shown that the nucleotide analogue GP5A strongly inhibits PfGAK activity (Ulschmid et al., 2004); this makes GP5A an attractive lead compound to assist in the design of drugs that are specific against this enzyme. Here, we report the expression, purification and crystallization of PfGAK and a preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis.

2. Methods and materials  

2.1. Expression and purification  

The coding region for PfGAK (Gene ID PFD0755c) was amplified using PCR from genomic DNA of P. falciparum strain 3D7 and was inserted into the bacterial expression vector pET28b (Novagen) via NdeI and XhoI restriction sites. The resultant plasmid encodes PfGAK with an N-terminal 6×His tag with the sequence MGSH­HHHHSSGLVPAGSH–. The PfGAK plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) Rosetta 2 cells (Novagen). The transformed cells were grown in 2×TY medium containing 30 µg ml−1 kanamycin and 30 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol at 310 K with shaking at 225 rev min−1 until the OD600 of the cells reached ∼0.8. Protein expression was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and the cells were incubated for a further 16–18 h at 289 K.

The cells were harvested, resuspended in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 0.1 mM PMSF) and lysed by sonication. After centrifugation at 12 000g for 45 min at 277 K, the cleared lysate was loaded onto a 5 ml HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer. Recombinant PfGAK was eluted with a linear gradient of 20–250 mM imidazole in lysis buffer. Fractions containing PfGAK were pooled and concentrated. The concentrated PfGAK protein was loaded onto a Superdex 200 16/60 size-exclusion column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 40 mM KCl, 2 mM DTT, from which it eluted as a dimer. In each purification step, fractions containing the protein were analyzed by 12% SDS–PAGE and appropriate fractions were pooled. After size-exclusion chromatography, fractions containing PfGAK were pooled and concentrated using Amicon Ultra centrifugal concentrators (10 kDa cutoff, Millipore). The concentration of PfGAK was determined spectrophotometrically at 280 nm with a NanoVue Plus (GE Healthcare) using its theoretical extinction coefficient of 12 170.

2.2. Crystallization  

Screening of crystallization conditions was performed by a Mosquito liquid handler (TTP LabTech) at 291 K using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method, mixing 200 nl PfGAK at 12 mg ml−1 with an equal volume of crystallization solution. Of the 576 conditions screened, initial hits were observed in Index (Hampton Research) condition No. 4 (2.0 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M bis-Tris–HCl pH 6.5) and Protein Complex Suite (Qiagen) condition No. 76 (2.0 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0). After optimization, improved crystals of PfGAK were grown in 1.9–2.1 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0 by mixing 2 µl PfGAK solution with 2 µl well solution.

2.3. Data collection and processing  

PfGAK crystals were soaked in a cryobuffer consisting of 4 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0 for about 5 min and flash-cooled by immersion in liquid nitrogen. Data collection was carried out on beamline 13B1, National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC), Hsinchu, Taiwan. Data collection from a single PfGAK crystal was performed with an exposure of 20 s per frame (1° oscillation) and at a wavelength of 1 Å. A total of 90 frames were collected using an ADSC Quantum 315 CCD detector. Diffraction intensities were integrated and scaled using HKL-2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997).

3. Results and discussion  

The DNA segment encoding PfGAK was cloned into the pET28b expression vector, resulting in the addition of an N-terminal 6×His tag. Recombinant PfGAK was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) Rosetta 2 cells (Novagen) and purified (Fig. 1). Crystals of PfGAK appeared after one week of incubation in the initial crystallization screen at 291 K. After optimization, single hexagonal crystals of PfGAK which were brown in colour grew to maximum dimensions of 0.3 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm over a period of 3–5 d (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

12% SDS–PAGE analysis of PfGAK purified by size-exclusion chromatography. Lane M, molecular-weight marker (labelled in kDa); lane 1, semi-purified PfGAK before size-exclusion chromatography; lanes 5–13, fractions of purified PfGAK following size-exclusion chromatography.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Crystal of PfGAK. Crystals typically grew to maximum dimensions of 0.3 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm.

X-ray diffraction and data collection of PfGAK crystals were performed on beamline 13B1 at NSRRC, Taiwan. A complete data set was collected from a single crystal to 2.9 Å resolution (Fig. 3) and was processed in space group P321 without a screw component. Systematic absences were then used to determine the exact space group as either P3121 or P3221, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 123.49, c = 180.82 Å, α = β = 90, γ = 120°. Despite PfGAK being a dimer in solution, the asymmetric unit was estimated to contain four to seven copies of PfGAK, with the crystal volume per unit molecular weight, V M, calculated to be between 2.10 and 3.68 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to a solvent content of 41.6–66.6% (Matthews, 1968). Attempts to detect the self-rotation function of PfGAK in the asymmetric unit using POLARRFN and MOLREP from the CCP4 suite (Winn et al., 2011) were inconclusive. As PfGAK exists as a dimer in solution, we predict that the asymmetric unit of the crystal should contain four to six copies of PfGAK, corresponding to two to three dimers. The data-collection statistics are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Diffraction image of the PfGAK crystal collected at NSRRC, Taiwan. The resolution limit at the edge is 2.9 Å. The insert shows a enlarged view of the diffraction at the edge of the detector.

Table 1. Crystallographic data-collection statistics for PfGAK.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

X-ray source 13B1, NSRRC
Wavelength (Å) 1.00
Space group P3121 or P3221
Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) a = b = 123.49, c = 180.82, α = β = 90, γ = 120
Resolution (Å) 30.0–2.90 (3.00–2.90)
Observed reflections 170651
Unique reflections 34852
Multiplicity 4.9 (4.1)
Completeness (%) 97.0 (82.5)
Rmerge (%) 9.8 (71.7)
Average I/σ(I) 19.1 (1.5)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic.

The solution of the structure of PfGAK is currently being actively pursued by the use of both heavy-atom derivatization and selenomethionine incorporation of the protein for MIR and MAD/SAD phasing, respectively, as molecular replacement using homologous proteins such as the AKs from E. coli (PDB entry 1ake; 31% homology; Müller & Schulz, 1992), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PDB entry 3aky; 33% homology; Spuergin et al., 1995) and Bacillus subtilus (PDB entry 2osb; 32% homology; R. Counago, C. J. Wilson, J. Myers, G. Wu, Y. Shamoo & P. Wittung-Stafshede, unpublished work) was unsuccessful.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff at beamline 13B1 of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Centre, Taiwan for their support and assistance. AWLL was supported by a postgraduate studentship from the HKU SPACE Research Fund.

References

  1. Cao, W., Haig-Ladewig, L., Gerton, G. L. & Moss, S. B. (2006). Biol. Reprod. 75, 492–500. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Dzeja, P. P., Bortolon, R., Perez-Terzic, C., Holmuhamedov, E. L. & Terzic, A. (2002). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 10156–10161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Dzeja, P. P. & Terzic, A. (2003). J. Exp. Biol. 206, 2039–2047. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Hancock, C. R., Janssen, E. & Terjung, R. L. (2006). J. Appl. Physiol. 100, 406–413. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Hay, S. I., Guerra, C. A., Tatem, A. J., Noor, A. M. & Snow, R. W. (2004). Lancet Infect. Dis. 4, 327–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Müller, C. W. & Schulz, G. E. (1992). J. Mol. Biol. 224, 159–177. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Perrier, V., Burlacu-Miron, S., Boussac, A., Meier, A. & Gilles, A. M. (1998). Protein Eng. 11, 917–923. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Petersen, I., Eastman, R. & Lanzer, M. (2011). FEBS Lett. 585, 1551–1562. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Sinclair, D., Zani, B., Donegan, S., Olliaro, P. & Garner, P. (2009). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, article No. CD007483. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007483.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Spuergin, P., Abele, U. & Schulz, G. E. (1995). Eur. J. Biochem 231, 405–413. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Ulschmid, J. K., Rahlfs, S., Schirmer, R. H. & Becker, K. (2004). Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 136, 211–220. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Vonrhein, C., Bönisch, H., Schäfer, G. & Schulz, G. E. (1998). J. Mol. Biol. 282, 167–179. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Webster, H. K. & Whaun, J. M. (1981). Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 55, 557–573. [PubMed]
  16. Wells, T. N. & Poll, E. M. (2010). Discov. Med. 9, 389–398. [PubMed]
  17. World Health Organization (2009). World Malaria Report 2009 Geneva: World Health Organization.
  18. Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.
  19. Yan, H. & Tsai, M. D. (1999). Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 73, 103–134. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES