Introduction
A complete copy of the entire cellular genome must be replicated during each cell cycle, and the replication process must insure that all genetic and epigenetic information is accurately transferred to the daughter cells. While the biochemical principles underlying DNA replication have been extensively studied, it is yet unclear how replication proceeds along with chromatin condensation and remodeling while ensuring the fidelity of the replicated genome. In most somatic cells, DNA replication starts from consistent multiple initiation sites on each chromosome and advances in a precise temporal and tissue-specific order. It is postulated that this temporal and spatial consistency reflects a tight orchestration of replication initiation events that is necessary to coordinate replication with other chromatin transactions such as transcription.
Clues for the coordination of DNA replication and transcription can be derived from biochemical mapping of replication initiation sites on a whole-genome scale. The timing of DNA replication during the S-phase exhibits a clear association with transcription and chromatin condensation, as earlier replicating regions tend to consist of transcribed genes [1] exhibiting high chromatin accessibility [2]. The biochemical details of the replication process in eukaryotes and the regulatory processes that insure that mitotic cells replicate their entire genome once per cell cycle have been summarized in excellent reviews [3–12]. Here we discuss recent insights obtained from genome-scale analyses of replication initiation sites and transcription in mammalian cells, evaluating the possible relationships between transcription and replication initiation events and the effects of chromatin modifications on replication initiation. We also discuss DNA sequences, such as insulators and replicators, which modulate replication and transcription of target genes, and use genome-wide maps of replication initiation sites to evaluate possible commonalities between replicators and chromatin insulators.
Dynamics of replication initiation: first lessons from genome-scale analyses of DNA replication
The initiation of DNA replication requires DNA sequences, termed replicators, that contain information required to start replication at particular chromosomal locations [13]. In eukaryotes, replication initiation events are detected throughout the genome and replicators can be isolated based on their ability to facilitate replication when moved from their original location to ectopic sites. However, replication initiation sites are more numerous than potential replicators and not all replicators are used during each cell cycle [14–16]. Replication also requires initiators, protein complexes that bind replicators to recruit members of the replication machinery. Initiators, but not replicators, are highly conserved in eukaryotes. Initiators form pre-replication complexes during the early stages of the G1 phase of the cell cycle [6] [8]. These complexes are recruited gradually onto chromatin in an inactive form, are activated by cyclin dependent kinases during the S-phase of the cell cycle and are disassembled from chromatin following replication and reassemble after mitosis [17] [12] [4] (Figure 1). Assembly and disassembly of pre-replication complexes allow cells to reprogram replication origins and allows for flexible determination of the likelihood of initiation at each potential replicator each cell cycle [14, 15, 18]. Reprogramming of replication initiation events might facilitate accurate genome replication only once throughout each cell cycle, but the rules governing the decision of which particular replication origins will initiate replication each cell cycle are yet unclear [3, 4, 6, 14, 15, 19].
Figure 1.

Assembly of pre-replication complexes on replicators [16, 105, 106].[107]. Based, with permission, on [14]. Replicators contain genetic information essential for initiation of DNA replication. Shortly after mitosis, replicators bind a six-subunit complex called the origin recognition complex (ORC) by recruiting the largest subunit of ORC, ORC1, to chromatin. ORC serves as a platform for the assembly of pre-replication complexes that include CDC6 and CDT1, which facilitate the loading of a helicase complex consisting of MCM (minichromosome maintenance) proteins 2–7 (licensing). The resulting complex is termed the pre-replication complex (PreRC). The PreRC is activated to create the pre-initiation complex (PreIC) by recruitment of additional factors including CDC45, SLD2–3 (Treslin), TOPBP1, the GINS complex (SLD1 and PSF1–3) and MCM10. Assembly and activation of the pre-initiation complex by cyclin dependent kinase mediated phosphorylation of SLD3 in yeast and mammalian Treslin leads to initiation of DNA replication.
The DNA sequence is not the only determinant of origin usage. Even in yeast, where ORC consensus sequences are well defined, only 400 out of the 12,000 potential initiator (Origin Recognition Complex, ORC) binding sites are functional [20]. The ORC1 subunit of ORC contains a conserved N-terminal bromo-adjacent homology domain that plays a role in both replicator binding and transcription [21]. Yeast Sir2, a histone deacetylase, binds replicators that also act as transcriptional silencers [22] and the interaction between Sir2 and some replicators regulates replicator-specific initiation of DNA replication [23, 24]. In metazoa, ORC does not exhibit sequence specific DNA binding [25, 26] beyond a general preference for AT-rich sequences [27–31]. Nucleosome positions, which are determined in part by DNA sequence [32, 33], also play a role in replication initiation sites selection in yeast and in metazoa [34–36]. For example, in S. cerevisiae, nucleosomes are arranged primarily by ORC, and when the configuration of the nucleosomes are disrupted or altered, replication initiation is impaired [26]. A recent study has shown through genome-wide nucleosome profiling, that in S. pombe, nucleosome-depleted regions do not colocalize with DNA replication origins [37]. However, it should be noted that these studies focused on fission yeast replication, whereas our study focuses on metazoans. Chromatin modifiers including histone acetyl transferases and chromatin remodeling complexes also affect replication initiation sites. Examples include the heterochromatin protein HP1, which interacts with ORC [38, 39] and with fission yeast Dfp1/Dbf4-dependent kinase Cdc7 [40] and modulates replication timing of pericentric heterochromatin in yeast [40], Drosophila [41] and mammalian cells [42]. Another example is the HBO1 histone acetyltransferase, which is needed for the loading of MCM onto chromatin in human cells and X. laevis extracts. HBO1 also interacts with the pre-replication complex during normal growth [43–45] and with the tumor suppressor p53 to modulate replication initiation events following hyperosmotic stress [46].
Coordination of transcription and replication
Transcription factors are known to be involved in specification of initiation sites. For example, the initiation of viral replication often colocalizes with transcription regulatory elements and those elements are essential for replication [47]. In yeast, binding of ORC to specific chromatin sites was enhanced by a yeast transcription factor, ScAbf1. ORC was then able to facilitate DNA replication by changing the chromatin structure and positions of the nucleosomes [48]. Other examples include the Drosophila Myb complex [49] and the Rb protein [50] which are both essential for replication of the amplified chorion locus, which require histone acetylation to recruit the ORC complex [51]. In vertebrates, replication is affected by transcription factor binding, as observed at the human c-myc replicators [52] in Xenopus egg extracts [53]. This is consistent with the observation that origin usage changes dynamically during differentiation and development [54] [1, 6, 14, 15, 55]. However, it should be noted that replication patterns can also change, genome-wide, in response to metabolic signals that do not directly involve transcription such as changes in nucleotide pool levels [56].
Genome-scale maps of replication initiation sites show that these sites are enriched with transcription factor binding motifs [57, 58] and CpG islands [59–61]. In human cells, microarray-based analyses of nascent DNA [58] [57] and replication intermediates [62] have identified several hundred replication initiation sites. Although the concordance between the identified replication initiation sites was not high, a common characteristic in all those studies was that replication initiation events were significantly enriched around transcription start sites (TSSs). For example, in the Karnani et al study [58] a third of initiation events occur at or near the RNA polymerase II binding sites and approximately 50% of the early origin activity was localized within 5 kb of transcription regulatory factor binding region clusters and were particularly enriched in DNAse I-hypersensitive sites, H3K4-(di- and tri)-methylation and H3 acetylation modifications on histones. Replication preferentially starts in transcribed gene regions [34] [62, 63] and associates with genomic regions exhibiting DNase hypersensitivity [61]. These analyses are consistent with replication timing studies suggesting that accessible chromatin replicates before highly condensed chromatin [1, 2, 35, 55, 64]. Interestingly, although replication initiation events are enriched in regions straddling transcription start sites, recent higher resolution analyses have shown that the transcription start sites themselves seem depleted in replication initiation events. This bimodal initiation pattern in regions flanking the transcription start site was observed in Drosophila, murine [34] and human [61] cells.
One possible explanation for initiation in regions flanking transcription start sites is that transcription initiation complexes interfere with the formation of replication initiation complexes. In our study [61], we tested this hypothesis directly by utilizing actual transcription information for the cell lines in which replication was mapped, comparing transcription levels with the frequency of replication initiation events in defined cell lines grown under identical conditions. This comparison was performed by utilizing information from the NCI datasets characterizing in detail the properties of cancer cell lines (http://discover.nci.nih.gov) [65]. This comparison showed that the depletion of replication initiation events from transcription start sites was notably prominent only in genes that are actually transcribed in the cell lines in which replication initiation events were mapped [61]. Untranscribed regions exhibited fewer initiation events overall, and no depletion near the transcription start sites. Interestingly, this direct comparison between active transcription and initiation of DNA replication also revealed that although moderately transcribed genomic regions were enriched in replication initiation events, regions exhibiting high transcription rate exhibited very low frequency of initiation, further supporting the assumption that transcription interferes with the initiation of DNA replication. These observations are consistent with earlier studies suggesting that active transcription excludes replication initiation events [66] [63] [67] and with the hypothesis that one of the advantages of consistent locations of initiation events is coordination of replication and transcription [5]. Studies at the human β-globin locus show that when silenced genes are activated and actively transcribed, there is a shift in replication timing from late-replication to early-replication [68, 69]. A similar activation of early replication was seen in T-cell receptor loci [70] as well as imunnoglobulin IgH [71].
Chromatin modifications that affect replication
A recent genome-scale study of replication sites in mouse and drosophila showed that in both species most CpG islands (CGI) initiate replication [72]. This is consistent with previous observations suggesting that replication often starts at CpG islands [60]. Methylation, which is nearly absent in Drosophila, was not crucial for defining the activated origin. Genome scale analyses in human cells evaluated replication initiation events in cells in relation with methylation levels in CpG regions. These studies revealed that the highest enrichment in initiation events was exhibited by methylated CpG regions and genes undergoing moderate transcription [61]. These findings seem contradictory because of the known association between CpG methylation and silencing of gene expression. However, it should be noted that recent studies suggest that CpG methylation is not limited to promoters that are negatively regulated and gene-body methylation is associated with active genes [73]; Recent analyses have also demonstrated that methylation in gene bodies is associated with early replication [74].
Notably, although genome-scale studies revealed that methylation of CpG sequences strongly affects the location of replication initiation sites, the same studies have demonstrated that histone modifications and transcription factor binding exhibit only a moderate correlation with replication initiation events [61]. These data are consistent with earlier studies suggesting that histone modifications and chromatin accessibility partially correlate with the locations of replication initiation events [57, 58]. Although acetylation of histones H3 and H4 modulate replication timing [75–77] and seem to be required for replication specific initiation of DNA replication in yeast [45], whole genome mapping studies have not found a single modification that correlates with genome-wide high frequency of initiation in several human cells. This does not rule out, however, that there are classes of replicators that are differentially affected by chromatin modifications, masking genome-wide analyses. For example, a recent study shows that HBO1 acetylates histone H4 and this interaction plays a role in replication [78]. It should be noted, however, that HBO1 also co-activates Cdt1 [79], which is essential for replication licensing, so it remains unclear what the precise role the acetylation of histone H4 plays in replication.
Although we have not yet found histone modifications that directly mark replication initiation sites, the emerging correlations with gene expression and the distinct effect of CpG methylation and DNAse hypersensitivity on the frequency of replication initiation events clearly indicates that replication initiation events reflect chromatin modifications. The absence of a single distinct histone modification in replication sites might highlight the potential combinatorial nature of the interactions that determine replication initiation events. Alternatively, chromatin might contain several classes of replicators, each potentially activated at a different stage of the cell cycle or under different conditions to coordinate replication and gene expression. The emerging correlations between chromatin accessibility and replication timing [2, 75] and the involvement of DNA sequences that modify chromatin in genetic determination of DNA replication initiation events (as described below) strengthen this hypothesis.
Distal regulation of DNA replication and the role of replicators as chromatin modifiers
Genetic studies suggest that distal DNA elements, which do not start replication but facilitate chromatin remodeling, interact with replicators and are required for initiation of replication at a number of loci. Conversely, replicator sequences themselves can affect chromatin structure. For example, replicators prevent transcriptional silencing [80] by facilitating an interaction between a locus control region and a chromatin remodeling complex [81].
Role of distal interactions
DNA sequences that participate in distal interactions with replicators play a role in chromatin modifications and transcriptional regulation. In Drosophila, an Amplification Control Element is essential for replication initiation at the amplified chorion locus [82] and is also required for the recruitment of transcription factors that play a role in regulating replication, such as Myb [49] and Rb [50]. The replicator at the human c-myc locus binds a protein, DUE-B, which recognizes unwound DNA and interacts with members of the pre-replication complex [83] and initiation is affected by histone acetylation. Replication initiation at the Chinese hamster DHFR locus requires a transcriptional promoter 17 kb 5′ to the 55 kb initiation zone [84], and initiation at the human beta-globin locus requires an upstream 40 kb region known as the locus control region (LCR) [85]. Similarly, initiation of DNA replication from the mouse IL-4/IL-13 locus also requires a distal transcriptional regulatory element (CNS-1: conserved noncoding sequence 1), which includes a DNase hypersensitive site [86].
Several observations suggest that the effect of distal transcriptional regulatory sequences on replication initiation is mediated through chromatin modifications and not by direct sequence specific interactions. For example, a heterologous promoter can substitute for the native Chinese hamster DHFR promoter, which is required for initiation of DNA replication from the DHFR intergenic region [66]. Similarly, replicators in the beta-globin locus, which require LCR sequences to initiate replication at their native location, can replicate at ectopic sites without the LCR, presumably interacting with distal elements at the new locations [87]. In addition, the lamin B replicator can interact with the human beta-globin LCR to facilitate early initiation when inserted at ectopic sites ([80] and see below). These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that the role of distal sequences is to promote or stabilize an environment that is permissive for the initiation of replication. According to this hypothesis, once a permissive environment is established, replication can start from any available replicator located within the permissive region.
The above observations raised the possibility that replicators are similar to DNA sequences, known as insulators, which play crucial roles in gene expression and anti-silencing/silencing of genes. Chromatin insulators are naturally occurring DNA elements that help form functional boundaries between adjacent chromatin domains [88–90]. One type of insulators known as “enhancer blocking” insulators function by blocking promoters from their distal sequences. The blocking or “insulating” of the target sequences, such as enhancers, can prevent inappropriate expression of a gene [89]. Insulators can also prevent chromatin modifications, such that DNA methylation and spread of heterochromatin. In some cases, insulators halt the spread of chromatin that leads to silencing of target genes and the insulator is therefore acting as an anti-silencer [88, 90–92].
Human Replicators that exhibit anti-silencing activity
Human replicators have been shown to prevent gene silencing while also preventing replication delay and histone deacetylation [80]. The locus control region (LCR) of the human beta-globin locus controls the expression of human beta-globin genes and has been shown to delay replication when moved to ectopic chromosomal sites [63, 93, 94]. Two replicators known as Rep-P and Rep-I [94], found on the human beta-like promoter of the beta-globin locus, can prevent transcriptional gene silencing. In that study, a vector that included LCR, a promoter and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) inserted into a late-replicating site in MEL cells delayed replication and expression was silenced. However, when Rep-P, Rep-I or a replicator from the human lamin B2 locus was inserted downstream of the LCR on the same plasmid, early replication occurred and EGFP was transcribed. Histone acetylation status also correlated with transcriptional status.
A recent study has identified a replicator-binding protein complex was essential for a physical interaction between LCR and an essential domain within Rep-P, and this interaction was required for the anti-silencing effect of the LCR/Rep-P interaction. The complex was identified as the LCR-associated remodeling complex (LARC), shown previously to bind LCR interacts with essential parts of Rep-P, and this interaction was needed to prevent transcriptional gene silencing [81]. Another protein complex (DARRT) binding at the HS4 site of the LCR contains DNA repair proteins and also affects replication and transcription [95]. Interestingly, the DARRT complex binds at a second essential sequence within Rep-P (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
The Rep-P replicator as a template for DNA-protein complexes that facilitate interactions with the distal locus control region [81, 95, 108]. A. Organization of LARC and DARRT binding sites on the Rep-P replicator in the context of the map of the beta globin locus. B. DARRT complexes bind both LCR and Rep-P; LARC mediates interactions between LCR and Rep-P. Please note that the number of complexes binding to LCR and Rep-P was not determined experimentally and the duplication in the DARRT complex signifies that it is unclear whether the same complex binds both to LCR and Rep-P. See text for details.
Several chromatin insulators in mammalian cells have been identified based on their ability to facilitate stable transcription and prevent gene silencing. It is intriguing to ask whether such insulators also exhibit replicator activity, testing the hypothesis that replicators might act as chromatin organizers to provide an accessible environment that facilitates both transcription and replication. Genome-scale mapping of replication initiation sites afforded some clues to assess whether such insulators also act as genomic replicators. Some examples are listed below.
The APOA1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster, located on human chromosome 11q23.3, contains sequence elements that bind CTCF and/or the RAD21 component of cohesin [96]. Enhanced CTCF/RAD1 binding insulator sites were found specifically from 116,120kb-116,260kb. Although CTCF binding is not associated with overall genomic enrichment of replication initiation sites [61], the APOA1 region exhibits an enhanced level of replication initiation events in several cancer cell lines (K562, HCT116, MCF7), embryonic stem cells and basic erythrocytes (Fig 3A).
Figure 3.
Replication initiation profiles at human chromatin insulators. Replication initiation profiles obtained through massively parallel sequencing of nascent DNA strands ([61] and Fu et al., unpublished) are visualized on the integrated genome viewer (http://www.broadinstitute.org/igv/). Nascent strands are defined as short, RNA primed DNA sequences that are above the size range of Okazaki fragments isolated from asynchronous cell cultures by size fractionation of chromatin followed by exposure to lambda exonuclease [61]. Nascent strands are sequenced and mapped to the human genome (hg19) as described. The frequency of replication initiation events is calculated for each chromosomal location as the ratio of sequence reads in the nascent strand preparation to the sequence reads aligned to the same location (100 bp bins) in genomic DNA. The panels show replication initiation data for four genomic loci. For each locus, a chromosome map is shown at the top. The analyzed region is shown underneath the ideogram, with map coordinates indicated. The experimental tracks (MCF7, K562 and HCT116 nascent strand [NS]/genome ratios) show the distribution of sequence reads (aligned with the indicated region) obtained from massively parallel sequencing of nascent strands from MCF7 breast cancer cells, K562 erythroleukemia cells or HCT116 colon sarcoma cells. All data are shown as histograms depicting the ratio of sequence reads obtained from a nascent strand preparation and reads obtained from a corresponding control genomic DNA preparation. For each track, the y-axis indicates the nascent strand/genomic DNA ratio. Reads were calculated as reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM). RefSeq genes are aligned under the nascent strand distribution. A. The APOA1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster. B. The gamma satellite region from human chromosome 8. C. The CBX3 locus. D. The TBP/PSMB locus.
Human gamma-satellite DNA consists of large stretches of DNA sequences that are non-coding and repeating [97]. Human gamma-satellite DNA can be found in most chromosomes in the pericentromeric regions. In a recent study, DNA-induced epigenetic silencing of transgene expression in RL5 cells was overcome when human pericentromeric DNA was added to the vector. The gamma-satellite DNA region from chromosome 8 showed the strongest anti-silencing effect. Tests for promoter or enhancer activity was performed for the gamma-satellite DNA region and the results were negative. This showed that the anti-silencing effect of the DNA region was not due to the transgene transcription’s up or down-regulation. The authors concluded from this study that the gamma-satellite DNA regions might be capable of halting heterochromatin from spreading from vector DNA [98]. The region cloned in the insulator assay, human chromosome 8: 47,138,647-47,140,586 (FIGURE 3B), shows strong initiation activity in several human cancer cell lines [61].
The ubiquitously acting chromatin opening element (UCOE) [99, 100] is derived from a methylation-free CpG island encompassing two divergently transcribed promoters, HNRPA2B1 and CBX3. A second UCOE from the similar TBP/PSMB1 locus exhibits the same properties. Gene therapy vectors that include the HNRPA2B1-CBX3 UCOE do not show transgene silencing and exhibit stable transgene expression even when integrated within centromeric heterochromatin [99]. Interestingly, both UCOEs regions exhibit a high frequency of replication initiation events (FIGURE 3C, D).
The colocalization between certain replicators and insulators, as described above, underlies the potential role of replicator sequences as chromatin organizers that coordinate the timing and location of replication initiation events with transcription and chromatin modifications. Elucidating proteins that bind replicators and the signaling networks that interact with those proteins might help understand how replication and transcription occur concomitantly on chromatin without endangering genomic stability. Pinpointing the DNA-protein interactions that stabilize gene expression concomitant with activating replicators might also have a practical use in improving gene therapy vectors. Understanding how replicator binding proteins affect replication initiation events might help elucidate the molecular interactions underlying insulator activity and perhaps this will help identify required interventions for gene therapy. In addition, maps identifying replication initiation sites at particular genomic sites in distinct differentiation states can help identify potential insulators based on replication initiation frequency in specific cells.
Insulators have important uses in addressing two critical problems encountered in gene therapy. Integrated DNA sequences are subject to chromosomal position effects – variations due to the genomic sequences and/or overall chromatin structures flanking the sites of vector integration [101, 102]. The tendency for transgene silencing presumably reflects, at least in part, the ease of spread of heterochromatin in higher eukaryotes [88, 89], resulting in the silencing of transgenes that integrate within or near heterochromatin, or in genomic loci that become heterochromatinized during differentiation. Conversely, vector sequences can influence the expression of cellular genes flanking the sites of integration. As many gene therapy vectors integrate preferentially within or close to active transcriptional domains [103, 104], enhancer elements associated with transcription regulatory elements might have a potential for deleterious mutagenesis by affecting the expression of adjacent genes. Insertional mutagenesis can often cause disruption or dysregulation of cellular gene expression, and in the most extreme cases can lead to clonal expansion and even oncogenic transformation [90]. It is therefore important to develop safer vectors that are capable of establishing and maintaining a transcriptionally competent chromatin domain, which give rise to reproducible and stable transgene expression without potential mutagenesis. It is also of interest to evaluate insulator activity, which can be used to reduce retroviral vector-mediated genotoxicity [90], associated with a high replication initiation frequency. Recent genome-wide maps of replication initiation events along with transcription frequency allow investigators to evaluate whether anti-silencer sequences used in other studies exhibit initiation of DNA replication.
In summary, the available data from genome-scale analyses of DNA replication represent the first step towards understanding the relationships between replication, transcription and chromatin modifications. As we continue to mine the replication initiation dataset and perform correlative studies between replication initiation, replication timing and chromatin modifications, we hope to understand how cells determine where and when DNA replication occurs in cancer and normal cells and how the time and location of replication initiation events affect genomic stability. Integrating maps of replication initiation sites with information about transcription and chromatin modifications might help predict which regions will be useful as insulators for gene therapy purposes and analyses of replicator binding proteins might provide insights into the mechanisms underlying chromatin insulator activity. Functional genetic assays for replicators and insulators combined with data from genome-wide analyses might help decipher the rules governing chromatin spreading and replication origin activation that facilitate stable and accurate transmission of genetic and epigenetic information each cell division.
Highlights.
Genome-scale maps and genetic analyzes probe how replication coordinates with transcription
Replication starts preferentially at accessible chromatin and at methylated CpG regions
Replication starts at regions that straddle but do not overlap transcription start site
Replication starts preferentially at moderate, but not highly transcribed, chromatin regions
DNA sequences that start replication might colocalize with chromatin insulators
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Hiratani I, Takebayashi S, Lu J, Gilbert DM. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect--part II. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19:142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ryba T, Hiratani I, Sasaki T, Battaglia D, Kulik M, Zhang J, Dalton S, Gilbert DM. Replication timing: a fingerprint for cell identity and pluripotency. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;7:e1002225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blow JJ, Dutta A. Preventing re-replication of chromosomal DNA. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:476–486. doi: 10.1038/nrm1663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Remus D, Diffley JF. Eukaryotic DNA replication control: lock and load, then fire. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:771–777. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gilbert DM. Making sense of eukaryotic DNA replication origins. Science. 2001;294:96–100. doi: 10.1126/science.1061724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mechali M. DNA replication origins: from sequence specificity to epigenetics. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:640–645. doi: 10.1038/35084598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dimitrova DS, Gilbert DM. DNA replication and nuclear organization: prospects for a soluble in vitro system. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1999;9:353–361. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v9.i3-4.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mendez J, Stillman B. Perpetuating the double helix: molecular machines at eukaryotic DNA replication origins. Bioessays. 2003;25:1158–1167. doi: 10.1002/bies.10370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gilbert DM. Evaluating genome-scale approaches to eukaryotic DNA replication. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:673–684. doi: 10.1038/nrg2830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mendez J. Temporal regulation of DNA replication in mammalian cells. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;44:343–351. doi: 10.1080/10409230903232618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.DePamphilis ML. Origins of DNA replication in metazoan chromosomes. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Machida YJ, Hamlin JL, Dutta A. Right place, right time, and only once: replication initiation in metazoans. Cell. 2005;123:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jacob F, Brenner S. [On the regulation of DNA synthesis in bacteria: the hypothesis of the replicon] C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1963;256:298–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aladjem MI. Replication in context: dynamic regulation of DNA replication patterns in metazoans. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:588–600. doi: 10.1038/nrg2143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mechali M. Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:728–738. doi: 10.1038/nrm2976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.DePamphilis ML, Blow JJ, Ghosh S, Saha T, Noguchi K, Vassilev A. Regulating the licensing of DNA replication origins in metazoa. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006;18:231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.DePamphilis ML. The ‘ORC cycle’: a novel pathway for regulating eukaryotic DNA replication. Gene. 2003;310:1–15. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00546-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gilbert DM, Takebayashi SI, Ryba T, Lu J, Pope BD, Wilson KA, Hiratani I. Space and time in the nucleus: developmental control of replication timing and chromosome architecture. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;75:143–153. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2010.75.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Masai H, Matsumoto S, You Z, Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Oda M. Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how? Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:89–130. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.103205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nieduszynski CA, Knox Y, Donaldson AD. Genome-wide identification of replication origins in yeast by comparative genomics. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1874–1879. doi: 10.1101/gad.385306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Muller P, Park S, Shor E, Huebert DJ, Warren CL, Ansari AZ, Weinreich M, Eaton ML, MacAlpine DM, Fox CA. The conserved bromo-adjacent homology domain of yeast Orc1 functions in the selection of DNA replication origins within chromatin. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1418–1433. doi: 10.1101/gad.1906410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Casey L, Patterson EE, Muller U, Fox CA. Conversion of a replication origin to a silencer through a pathway shared by a Forkhead transcription factor and an S phase cyclin. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:608–622. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-04-0323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fox CA, Weinreich M. Beyond heterochromatin: SIR2 inhibits the initiation of DNA replication. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:3330–3334. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.21.6971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Crampton A, Chang F, Pappas DL, Jr, Frisch RL, Weinreich M. An ARS element inhibits DNA replication through a SIR2-dependent mechanism. Mol Cell. 2008;30:156–166. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vashee S, Cvetic C, Lu W, Simancek P, Kelly TJ, Walter JC. Sequence-independent DNA binding and replication initiation by the human origin recognition complex. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1894–1908. doi: 10.1101/gad.1084203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Remus D, Beall EL, Botchan MR. DNA topology, not DNA sequence, is a critical determinant for Drosophila ORC-DNA binding. EMBO J. 2004;23:897–907. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stefanovic D, Stanojcic S, Vindigni A, Ochem A, Falaschi A. In vitro protein-DNA interactions at the human lamin B2 replication origin. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:42737–42743. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307058200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Austin RJ, Orr-Weaver TL, Bell SP. Drosophila ORC specifically binds to ACE3, an origin of DNA replication control element. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2639–2649. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.20.2639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kong D, Coleman TR, DePamphilis ML. Xenopus origin recognition complex (ORC) initiates DNA replication preferentially at sequences targeted by Schizosaccharomyces pombe ORC. EMBO J. 2003;22:3441–3450. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stanojcic S, Lemaitre JM, Brodolin K, Danis E, Mechali M. In Xenopus egg extracts, DNA replication initiates preferentially at or near asymmetric AT sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:5265–5274. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00181-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.MacAlpine DM, Rodriguez HK, Bell SP. Coordination of replication and transcription along a Drosophila chromosome. Genes Dev. 2004;18:3094–3105. doi: 10.1101/gad.1246404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaplan N, Moore I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, Field Y, Hughes TR, Lieb JD, Widom J, Segal E. Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:918–920. doi: 10.1038/nsmb0810-918. author reply 920–912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, Field Y, LeProust EM, Hughes TR, Lieb JD, Widom J, Segal E. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature. 2009;458:362–366. doi: 10.1038/nature07667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cayrou C, Coulombe P, Vigneron A, Stanojcic S, Ganier O, Peiffer I, Rivals E, Puy A, Laurent-Chabalier S, Desprat R, Mechali M. Genome-scale analysis of metazoan replication origins reveals their organization in specific but flexible sites defined by conserved features. Genome Res. 2011;21:1438–1449. doi: 10.1101/gr.121830.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lubelsky Y, Sasaki T, Kuipers MA, Lucas I, Le Beau MM, Carignon S, Debatisse M, Prinz JA, Dennis JH, Gilbert DM. Pre-replication complex proteins assemble at regions of low nucleosome occupancy within the Chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase initiation zone. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:3141–3155. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lipford JR, Bell SP. Nucleosomes positioned by ORC facilitate the initiation of DNA replication. Mol Cell. 2001;7:21–30. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00151-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.de Castro E, Soriano I, Marin L, Serrano R, Quintales L, Antequera F. Nucleosomal organization of replication origins and meiotic recombination hotspots in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2012;31:124–137. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pak DT, Pflumm M, Chesnokov I, Huang DW, Kellum R, Marr J, Romanowski P, Botchan MR. Association of the origin recognition complex with heterochromatin and HP1 in higher eukaryotes. Cell. 1997;91:311–323. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80415-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Prasanth SG, Shen Z, Prasanth KV, Stillman B. Human origin recognition complex is essential for HP1 binding to chromatin and heterochromatin organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15093–15098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009945107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hayashi MT, Takahashi TS, Nakagawa T, Nakayama J, Masukata H. The heterochromatin protein Swi6/HP1 activates replication origins at the pericentromeric region and silent mating-type locus. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:357–362. doi: 10.1038/ncb1845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schwaiger M, Kohler H, Oakeley EJ, Stadler MB, Schubeler D. Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) modulates replication timing of the Drosophila genome. Genome Res. 2010;20:771–780. doi: 10.1101/gr.101790.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Quivy JP, Gerard A, Cook AJ, Roche D, Almouzni G. The HP1-p150/CAF-1 interaction is required for pericentric heterochromatin replication and S-phase progression in mouse cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:972–979. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chadha GS, Blow JJ. Histone acetylation by HBO1 tightens replication licensing. Mol Cell. 2010;37:5–6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Iizuka M, Matsui T, Takisawa H, Smith MM. Regulation of replication licensing by acetyltransferase Hbo1. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:1098–1108. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.3.1098-1108.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Unnikrishnan A, Gafken PR, Tsukiyama T. Dynamic changes in histone acetylation regulate origins of DNA replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:430–437. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Iizuka M, Sarmento OF, Sekiya T, Scrable H, Allis CD, Smith MM. Hbo1 Links p53-dependent stress signaling to DNA replication licensing. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:140–153. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00662-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.DePamphilis ML. Transcriptional elements as components of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication. Cell. 1988;52:635–638. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90398-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kong D, DePamphilis ML. Site-specific ORC binding, pre-replication complex assembly and DNA synthesis at Schizosaccharomyces pombe replication origins. EMBO J. 2002;21:5567–5576. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Beall EL, Manak JR, Zhou S, Bell M, Lipsick JS, Botchan MR. Role for a Drosophila Myb-containing protein complex in site-specific DNA replication. Nature. 2002;420:833–837. doi: 10.1038/nature01228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bosco G, Du W, Orr-Weaver TL. DNA replication control through interaction of E2F-RB and the origin recognition complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:289–295. doi: 10.1038/35060086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aggarwal BD, Calvi BR. Chromatin regulates origin activity in Drosophila follicle cells. Nature. 2004;430:372–376. doi: 10.1038/nature02694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ghosh M, Liu G, Randall G, Bevington J, Leffak M. Transcription factor binding and induced transcription alter chromosomal c-myc replicator activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:10193–10207. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.23.10193-10207.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Danis E, Brodolin K, Menut S, Maiorano D, Girard-Reydet C, Mechali M. Specification of a DNA replication origin by a transcription complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:721–730. doi: 10.1038/ncb1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tabancay AP, Jr, Forsburg SL. Eukaryotic DNA replication in a chromatin context. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006;76:129–184. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)76005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hiratani I, Ryba T, Itoh M, Yokochi T, Schwaiger M, Chang CW, Lyou Y, Townes TM, Schubeler D, Gilbert DM. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Anglana M, Apiou F, Bensimon A, Debatisse M. Dynamics of DNA replication in mammalian somatic cells: Nucleotide pool modulates origin choice and interorigin spacing. Cell. 2003;114:385–394. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00569-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cadoret JC, Meisch F, Hassan-Zadeh V, Luyten I, Guillet C, Duret L, Quesneville H, Prioleau MN. Genome-wide studies highlight indirect links between human replication origins and gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15837–15842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805208105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Karnani N, Taylor CM, Malhotra A, Dutta A. Genomic Study of Replication Initiation in Human Chromosomes Reveals the Influence of Transcription Regulation and Chromatin Structure on Origin Selection. Mol Biol Cell. 2009:393–404. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-08-0707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gomez M, Brockdorff N. Heterochromatin on the inactive X chromosome delays replication timing without affecting origin usage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6923–6928. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401854101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Antequera F. Genomic specification and epigenetic regulation of eukaryotic DNA replication origins. EMBO J. 2004;23:4365–4370. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Martin MM, Ryan M, Kim R, Zakas AL, Fu H, Lin CM, Reinhold WC, Davis SR, Bilke S, Liu H, Doroshow JH, Reimers MA, Valenzuela MS, Pommier Y, Meltzer PS, Aladjem MI. Genome-wide depletion of replication initiation events in highly transcribed regions. Genome Res. 2011 doi: 10.1101/gr.124644.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mesner LD, Valsakumar V, Karnani N, Dutta A, Hamlin JL, Bekiranov S. Bubble-chip analysis of human origin distributions demonstrates on a genomic scale significant clustering into zones and significant association with transcription. Genome Res. 2011;21:377–389. doi: 10.1101/gr.111328.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Feng YQ, Warin R, Li T, Olivier E, Besse A, Lobell A, Fu H, Lin CM, Aladjem MI, Bouhassira EE. The human beta-globin locus control region can silence as well as activate gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:3864–3874. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.10.3864-3874.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hansen RS, Thomas S, Sandstrom R, Canfield TK, Thurman RE, Weaver M, Dorschner MO, Gartler SM, Stamatoyannopoulos JA. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:139–144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912402107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shankavaram UT, Varma S, Kane D, Sunshine M, Chary KK, Reinhold WC, Pommier Y, Weinstein JN. CellMiner: a relational database and query tool for the NCI-60 cancer cell lines. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:277. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Saha S, Shan Y, Mesner LD, Hamlin JL. The promoter of the Chinese hamster ovary dihydrofolate reductase gene regulates the activity of the local origin and helps define its boundaries. Genes Dev. 2004;18:397–410. doi: 10.1101/gad.1171404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hamlin JL, Mesner LD, Lar O, Torres R, Chodaparambil SV, Wang L. A revisionist replicon model for higher eukaryotic genomes. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105:321–329. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Simon I, Tenzen T, Mostoslavsky R, Fibach E, Lande L, Milot E, Gribnau J, Grosveld F, Fraser P, Cedar H. Developmental regulation of DNA replication timing at the human beta globin locus. EMBO J. 2001;20:6150–6157. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.21.6150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Dhar V, Skoultchi AI, Schildkraut CL. Activation and repression of a beta-globin gene in cell hybrids is accompanied by a shift in its temporal replication. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:3524–3532. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mostoslavsky R, Singh N, Tenzen T, Goldmit M, Gabay C, Elizur S, Qi P, Reubinoff BE, Chess A, Cedar H, Bergman Y. Asynchronous replication and allelic exclusion in the immune system. Nature. 2001;414:221–225. doi: 10.1038/35102606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ermakova OV, Nguyen LH, Little RD, Chevillard C, Riblet R, Ashouian N, Birshtein BK, Schildkraut CL. Evidence that a single replication fork proceeds from early to late replicating domains in the IgH locus in a non-B cell line. Mol Cell. 1999;3:321–330. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80459-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Cayrou C, Coulombe P, Mechali M. Programming DNA replication origins and chromosome organization. Chromosome Res. 2010;18:137–145. doi: 10.1007/s10577-009-9105-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Aran D, Toperoff G, Rosenberg M, Hellman A. Replication timing-related and gene body-specific methylation of active human genes. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:670–680. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Suzuki M, Oda M, Ramos MP, Pascual M, Lau K, Stasiek E, Agyiri F, Thompson RF, Glass JL, Jing Q, Sandstrom R, Fazzari MJ, Hansen RS, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, McLellan AS, Greally JM. Late-replicating heterochromatin is characterized by decreased cytosine methylation in the human genome. Genome Res. 2011;21:1833–1840. doi: 10.1101/gr.116509.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hansen RS, Thomas S, Sandstrom R, Canfield TK, Thurman RE, Weaver M, Dorschner MO, Gartler SM, Stamatoyannopoulos JA. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:139–144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912402107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Vogelauer M, Rubbi L, Lucas I, Brewer BJ, Grunstein M. Histone acetylation regulates the time of replication origin firing. Mol Cell. 2002;10:1223–1233. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00702-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ryba T, Hiratani I, Sasaki T, Battaglia D, Kulik M, Zhang J, Dalton S, Gilbert DM. Replication timing: a fingerprint for cell identity and pluripotency. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Miotto B, Struhl K. HBO1 histone acetylase activity is essential for DNA replication licensing and inhibited by Geminin. Mol Cell. 2010;37:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Arias EE, Walter JC. Strength in numbers: preventing rereplication via multiple mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. Genes Dev. 2007;21:497–518. doi: 10.1101/gad.1508907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Fu H, Wang L, Lin CM, Singhania S, Bouhassira EE, Aladjem MI. Preventing gene silencing with human replicators. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:572–576. doi: 10.1038/nbt1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Huang L, Fu H, Lin CM, Conner A, Zhang Y, Aladjem MI. Prevention of transcriptional silencing by a replicator-binding complex consisting of SWI/SNF, MeCP1 and hnRNP C1/C2. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:3472–3484. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05587-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lu L, Zhang H, Tower J. Functionally distinct, sequence-specific replicator and origin elements are required for Drosophila chorion gene amplification. Genes Dev. 2001;15:134–146. doi: 10.1101/gad.822101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Chowdhury A, Liu G, Kemp M, Chen X, Katrangi N, Myers S, Ghosh M, Yao J, Gao Y, Bubulya P, Leffak M. The DNA unwinding element binding protein DUE-B interacts with Cdc45 in preinitiation complex formation. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:1495–1507. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00710-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kalejta RF, Li X, Mesner LD, Dijkwel PA, Lin HB, Hamlin JL. Distal sequences, but not ori-beta/OBR-1, are essential for initiation of DNA replication in the Chinese hamster DHFR origin. Molecular Cell. 1998;2:797–806. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80294-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Aladjem MI, Groudine M, Brody LL, Dieken ES, Fournier RE, Wahl GM, Epner EM. Participation of the human beta-globin locus control region in initiation of DNA replication. Science. 1995;270:815–819. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hayashida T, Oda M, Ohsawa K, Yamaguchi A, Hosozawa T, Locksley RM, Giacca M, Masai H, Miyatake S. Replication initiation from a novel origin identified in the Th2 cytokine cluster locus requires a distant conserved noncoding sequence. J Immunol. 2006;176:5446–5454. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.9.5446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Aladjem M, Rodewald L-W, Kolman JL, Wahl GM. Genetic dissection of a mammalian replicator in the human beta-globin locus. Science. 1998;281:1005–1009. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5379.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Raab JR, Kamakaka RT. Insulators and promoters: closer than we think. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:439–446. doi: 10.1038/nrg2765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Gaszner M, Felsenfeld G. Insulators: exploiting transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:703–713. doi: 10.1038/nrg1925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Emery DW. The use of chromatin insulators to improve the expression and safety of integrating gene transfer vectors. Hum Gene Ther. 2011;22:761–774. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kamakaka RT. Chromatin: a connection between loops and barriers? Curr Biol. 2002;12:R535–537. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01032-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Emery DW, Yannaki E, Tubb J, Stamatoyannopoulos G. A chromatin insulator protects retrovirus vectors from chromosomal position effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9150–9155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160159597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Lin CM, Fu H, Martinovsky M, Bouhassira E, Aladjem MI. Dynamic alterations of replication timing in mammalian cells. Curr Biol. 2003;13:1019–1028. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00382-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wang L, Lin CM, Lopreiato JO, Aladjem MI. Cooperative sequence modules determine replication initiation sites at the human beta-globin locus. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2613–2622. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Karmakar S, Mahajan MC, Schulz V, Boyapaty G, Weissman SM. A multiprotein complex necessary for both transcription and DNA replication at the beta-globin locus. EMBO J. 2010;29:3260–3271. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mishiro T, Ishihara K, Hino S, Tsutsumi S, Aburatani H, Shirahige K, Kinoshita Y, Nakao M. Architectural roles of multiple chromatin insulators at the human apolipoprotein gene cluster. EMBO J. 2009;28:1234–1245. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature. 1994;371:215–220. doi: 10.1038/371215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kim JH, Ebersole T, Kouprina N, Noskov VN, Ohzeki J, Masumoto H, Mravinac B, Sullivan BA, Pavlicek A, Dovat S, Pack SD, Kwon YW, Flanagan PT, Loukinov D, Lobanenkov V, Larionov V. Human gamma-satellite DNA maintains open chromatin structure and protects a transgene from epigenetic silencing. Genome Res. 2009;19:533–544. doi: 10.1101/gr.086496.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Antoniou M, Harland L, Mustoe T, Williams S, Holdstock J, Yague E, Mulcahy T, Griffiths M, Edwards S, Ioannou PA, Mountain A, Crombie R. Transgenes encompassing dual-promoter CpG islands from the human TBP and HNRPA2B1 loci are resistant to heterochromatin-mediated silencing. Genomics. 2003;82:269–279. doi: 10.1016/s0888-7543(03)00107-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Williams S, Mustoe T, Mulcahy T, Griffiths M, Simpson D, Antoniou M, Irvine A, Mountain A, Crombie R. CpG-island fragments from the HNRPA2B1/CBX3 genomic locus reduce silencing and enhance transgene expression from the hCMV promoter/enhancer in mammalian cells. BMC Biotechnol. 2005;5:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-5-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Emery DW, Yannaki E, Tubb J, Nishino T, Li Q, Stamatoyannopoulos G. Development of virus vectors for gene therapy of beta chain hemoglobinopathies: flanking with a chromatin insulator reduces gamma-globin gene silencing in vivo. Blood. 2002;100:2012–2019. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ellis J, Yao S. Retrovirus silencing and vector design: relevance to normal and cancer stem cells? Curr Gene Ther. 2005;5:367–373. doi: 10.2174/1566523054546233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mitchell RS, Beitzel BF, Schroder AR, Shinn P, Chen H, Berry CC, Ecker JR, Bushman FD. Retroviral DNA integration: ASLV, HIV, and MLV show distinct target site preferences. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:E234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Wu X, Li Y, Crise B, Burgess SM. Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration. Science. 2003;300:1749–1751. doi: 10.1126/science.1083413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Diffley JF. Regulation of early events in chromosome replication. Curr Biol. 2004;14:R778–786. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Labib K. How do Cdc7 and cyclin-dependent kinases trigger the initiation of chromosome replication in eukaryotic cells? Genes Dev. 2010;24:1208–1219. doi: 10.1101/gad.1933010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bell SP, Dutta A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:333–374. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Mahajan MC, Narlikar GJ, Boyapaty G, Kingston RE, Weissman SM. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C1/C2, MeCP1, and SWI/SNF form a chromatin remodeling complex at the beta-globin locus control region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15012–15017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507596102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


