Skip to main content
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal logoLink to Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
letter
. 2011 Sep 15;13(9):684–686. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.20741804.2242

Visiting Hour Policies in Intensive Care Units, Southern Iran

S Haghbin 1,*, Z Tayebi 2, A Abbasian 2, H Haghbin 3
PMCID: PMC3372010  PMID: 22737546

Dear Editor,

Admission to intensive care unit (ICU) is potentially a stressful experience for both the patients and their families. In addition to pain and severity of the critical diseases, sleeplessness, immobility and overwhelming noises from ICU equipments, anxiety from overhearing the stranger and unfamiliar conversations of the staff and visitors about the patients’ conditions, psychologically affect the ICU patient.[1][2][3] The critical condition of the patients could be a source of stress for the respective families as well, so that sometimes it is referred to as in-family crisis.[4][5] Nowadays, the role of families in the critical patients’ recovery is considered very important, and professionals focus on family and patient-centered systems. Therefore, it has long been suggested that open and flexible visiting policies can positively affect such patients’ conditions and consequently can help families cope with the crisis and promote their satisfaction.

To investigate the current status of the visiting hours and policies, we carried out this descriptive cross-sectional study in summer 2009 in all 71 ICUs in Fars Province, south of Iran. A questionnaire based on a previous study, conducted in Italy,[3] was prepared and filled for each unit by a single researcher through face to face and telephone communication with respective head nurses. To this end, the ICUs consisting of general (20%), specialist (17%), neonatal/pediatric (18%) and cardiac (38%) units in private centers, university teaching and governmental non-teaching hospitals were enrolled. As the data were shown in the Table 1, restrictions were on the numbers and age of visitors, and hours of visits in all units. In 39.4% of the units no visits was allowed. In 15.5%, visiting time was 1.5-2 hours and in 23.9% was one hour a day in some of which the visits were through the glass windows due to the limitation of space and facilities.

Table 1. Visiting policies in the surveyed intensive care units, Fars, southern Iran, 2009.

Open policy Number %
Yes 7 9.9
No 64 90.1
Daily visiting time
No visitation 28 39.4
Up to 1 hour 17 23.9
1.5-2 hour 11 15.5
>2 hours 15 21.2
Frequency of visit per week
0 days 28 39.4
2 days 2 2.8
3 days 1 1.4
Every day 40 56.4
Number of visitors at a time
0 person 28 39.4
One person 21 29.6
2 persons 22 31
Visit by children permitted
Yes 0 0
No 66 93
Sometimes 5 7
In-charge of visiting hours
Nurse in-charge 16 22.5
Physician 7 9.9
Hospital authorities 40 56.3
Group decision 3 4.2
Unknown 5 7.1
Decision on exceptional events
Nurse in-charge 48 67.6
Physician 10 14.1
both 13 18.3
Telephone Information provision
Yes 65 91.6
No 6 8.4
The person receiving telephone information
No one 6 8.4
Immediate family 19 26.8
Relatives 46 64.8

The main finding of the present survey was the uniform practicing restriction on the visiting policy in all ICUs. Gianini et al. similarly conducted a study in Italy and found almost the same results.[6] Tendency toward open policy has been reported from France (23%), UK (50%), and Sweden (70%).[7] These varying visiting policies might be due to different cultural and attitudinal factors in different communities.

Restricted visiting hours dates back to the late 1800s and for a variety of reasons including creating more discipline in the wards and avoiding the transmission of infection.[8][9] Berti et al. revealed that the influential environmental and organizational factors in this respect include the limitation of ICU space, providing more time to patients’ rest,[10] insufficient nurse to bed ratio, avoiding interruption of nursing care and reducing the tension between the staff and families. Also, researchers in the field unanimously agree that the attitudes of the ICU staff is the most important factor that can facilitate the path towards unrestricted visiting policy and a commitment to removing all barriers.[3]

Considering the evidence supporting open policies and the present study findings, we can conclude that the revision of current visiting policies in Iran is required in order to create more positive effects and satisfaction on the part of patients and their families. We do not recommend the universal implementation of unrestricted ICU visiting policies but rather a kind of modification in the policies, based on our cultural background so that a balance is established between the patients’ safety, their families’ need and also the nurses and physicians’ management in the ICUs. To do so, further studies need to be carried out to identify the obstacles to the implementation of open visiting policies.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.Fumagalli S, Boncinelli L, Lo Nostro A, Valoti P, Baldereschi G, Di Bari M, Ungar A, Baldasseroni S, Geppetti P, Masotti G, Pini R, Marchionni N. Reduced cardiocirculatory complications with unrestrictive visiting policy in an intensive care unit results from a pilot, randomized trial. Circulation. 2006;113:946–52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.572537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berwick DM, Kotagal M. Restricted visiting hours in ICUs: time to change. JAMA. 2004;292:736–37. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.6.736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anzoletti AB, Buja A, Bortolusso V, Zampieron A. Access to intensive care units: A survey in North-East Italy. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008;24:366–74. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2008.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Farrell ME, Joseph DH, Schwartz-Barcott D. Visiting Hours in the ICU: finding the balance among patient, visitor and staff Needs. Nurs Forum. 2005;40:18–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2005.00001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hinkle JL, Fitzpatrick E, Oskrochi GR. Identifying the perception of needs of family members visiting and nurses working in the intensive care unit. J Neurosci Nurs. 2009;41:85–91. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0b013e31819c2db4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giannini A, Miccinesi G, Leoncino S. Visiting policies in Italian intensive care units: a nationwide survey. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1256–62. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1037-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Quinio P, Savry C, Deghelt A, Guilloux M, Catineau J, de Tinteniac A. A multicenter survey of visiting policies in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1389–94. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1402-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ismail S, Mulley G. Visiting times. BMJ. 2007;335:1316–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39420.392373.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smith L, Medves J, Harrison MB, Tranmer J, Waytuck B. The impact of hospital visiting hour policies on pediatrics and adult patients and their visitors. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:2293–98. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907020-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Berti D, Ferdinande P, Moons P. Beliefs and attitudes of intensive care nurses toward visits and open visiting policy. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1060–5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0599-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Brieflands

RESOURCES