Abstract
Integrins not only mediate cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix adhesion, but also affect the multitude of signal transduction cascades in control of cell survival, proliferation, differentiation and organ development. Mutations in integrins or the major effectors of integrin signalling pathways cause defective organ development, immunodeficiency, cancer or autoimmune disease. Understanding of the signalling events that drive integrin activation and signalling is therefore crucial to uncover the molecular mechanisms of these diseases. This review discusses the key signalling complexes regulating integrin activation and function in both ‘inside-out’ and ‘outside-in’ pathways in T lymphocytes, including kinases, SLP-76, VAV1, ADAP, SKAP-55, RapL, RIAM, Rap1, Talin and Kindlin.
Keywords: adaptor proteins, cytoskeleton, inside-out signalling, integrin activation, outside-in signalling
Integrin families and functions
Integrins are transmembrane adhesion receptors that mediate cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix adhesion and also induce bidirectional signalling across the cell membrane to regulate cell proliferation, activation, migration and homeostasis.1 Each integrin contains one α subunit and one β subunit. So far, eighteen α subunits and eight β subunits have been characterized that form 24 different integrins in vertebrates. Studies from gene knockout mice lacking different α and β subunits have indicated that various integrins play crucial roles during development of different organs. α5 knockout mice show vascular defects, and α4 knockout mice have impaired cardiac development.2,3α3 knockout mice are perinatally lethal with marked abnormalities in lung development and α6 knockout mice develop severe skin blistering.4,5 Except for their crucial role in organ development, integrins participate in the process of wound healing, cancer, immune responses against infection and autoimmune diseases. At least 12 integrins are expressed in various types of leucocytes and platelets (Table 1).6 Accumulation of evidence from human and mouse models has shown that defects in integrin expression or activation in these immune cells result in serious immunodeficiency or autoimmune diseases. Mice with null mutations of the αL or β2 subunit show phenotypes similar to patients with leucocyte adhesion deficiency I, including spontaneous infections, impaired leucocyte adhesion and migration to the inflamed and infected skin.7 In this context, integrins have served as potential therapeutic targets for diseases, such as blocking antibodies to very late antigen-4 (α4β1) (i.e. natalizumab) and leucocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1; αLβ2; or CD11a CD18) (i.e. efalizumab) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and psoriasis, respectively.8,9 In the past decades, numerous studies have emerged to propose models of integrin activation and have identified key effectors that could regulate integrin activation. These studies might provide new target molecules to treat patients with these immune cell-based disorders.
Table 1.
Integrin names | Ligands | Expression patterns | Major functions |
---|---|---|---|
αLβ2 (LFA-1, CD11a/CD18) | ICAM-1-5, TLN, Type I collagen | T cell, B cell, monocyte/macrophage, NK cell, DC, neutrophil, eosinophil | Migration of T cell, monocyte, neutrophil and eosinophil, activation and adhesion of T cell, DC and B cell, cytotoxicity of CTL and NK cell85–87 |
αMβ2 (Mac-1, CR3, CD11b/CD18) | ICAM-1, ICAM-2, ICAM-4, iC3b, fibrinogen, factor X, heparin, laminin, LPS, zymosan, oligodeoxynucleotide, collagen, elastase | Monocyte/macrophage, DC, neutrophil, eosinophil, basophil, NK cell | Adhesion, activation and phagocytosis of macrophage, monocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil, basophil, DC and NK cell79,88 |
αXβ2 (p150/95, CR4, CD11c/CD18) | C3bi, fibrinogen, collagen, CD23 heparin, LPS denatured protein | Monocyte/macrophage, neutrophil, NK cell | Adhesion and phagocytosis of monocyte/macrophage and neutrophil, adhesion of NK cell6,88 |
αDβ2 (CD11d/CD18) | ICAM-3, VCAM-1 | Macrophage, eosinophil, T cell, NK cell | Adhesion and migration of macrophage and eosinophil, adhesion of T cell89 |
α4β1 (VLA-4, CD49d/CD29) | VCAM-1, MAdCAM-1, fibrinogen, fibronectin, thrombospondin, pro-vWF, osteopontin, chondroitin | T cell, B cell, DC, monocyte/macrophage, NK cell, neutrophil, eosinophil, basophil | Migration and development of T cell and B cell, migration of monocyte/macrophage, eosinophil, and DC cell, adhesion of NK cell and neutrophil90–92 |
α4β7 (LPAM-1, CD49d/CD-) | MAdCAM-1, VCAM-1, fibrinogen, fibronectin, osteopontin | T cell, B cell, monocyte/macrophage, NK cell, DC, eosinophil, basophil | Migration and development of T cell and B cell, migration of monocyte, macrophage, DC, eosinophil and NK cell90,93 |
αEβ7 (HML-1, CD103/CD-) | E-cadherin | T cell, Treg, NK cell, DC, macrophage | Adhesion and activation of T cell and DC, cytotoxicity of T cell, suppressive function of Treg, recruitment of NK cell and macrophage94–96 |
αVβ3 (CD51/CD61) | Vitronectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, PECAM-1, fibrinogen, fibronectin, vWF, LAP-TGF-β, thrombospondin | Monocyte, macrophage, DC, neutrophil | Migration of monocyte, macrophage and neutrophil, phagocytosis of DC and macrophage97,98 |
CR3, complement receptor-3; DC, dendritic cell; HML-1, human mucosal lymphocyte antigen-1; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; LAP–TGF-β, latency-associated peptide–transforming growth factor-β complex; LFA-1, lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LPAM-1, lymphocyte Peyer's patch adhesion molecule-1; Mac-1, Macrophage-1 antigen; MAdCAM-1, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1; NK cell, natural killer cell; PECAM-1, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1; TLN, telencephalin; Treg, regulatory T cell; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; VLA-4, very late antigen-4; vWF, von Willebrand factor.
Models of integrin activation
Integrin conformational changes are thought to convert integrin affinity from low or intermediate levels to high levels. As a transmembrane receptor, the extracellular parts of α and β subunits form a ligand-binding headpiece and the transmembrane parts are followed by short cytoplasmic tails. In a resting state, the ligand-binding headpiece of an integrin is bent and close to the cell membrane, whereas the cytoplasmic tails are close together to form a conformation with low affinity. When the cytoskeletal protein talin binds to the tail of the β subunit, it is sufficient to expose the epitopes in the stalk regions and generate a conformation with intermediate affinity. Once the cytoplasmic tails of α and β subunits undergo significant separation and the extracellular parts stand up, the high-affinity conformation is generated.6,10 In recent years, growing evidence suggests that both external and internal mechanical forces play important roles in integrin activation and bidirectional signalling. Fluid shear stress is one major external force that exerts on integrins in circulating leucocytes or those in transendothelial migration process. In contrast, when the cytoplasmic tails of integrins interact with different signalling molecules inside leucocytes, such as talin, kindlins, vinculins and actin, tension or internal force is generated.11 It has been reported that integrin α5β1 is activated by tension force generated between the extracelluar fibronectin-coated surface and the intercellular cytoskeleton.12 Other reports also shed light on our understanding of the connection between chemical signalling and the force mechanics of the integrin network.13 The catch bond formation in the activation of the integrin headpiece is another example of an external force to activate integrins.14
Except for the role of external and internal mechanical forces and integrin conformational changes in affinity modulation, integrin has also been shown to form clusters or accumulate at one part of the cell to increase its avidity. In resting T lymphocytes, integrin is distributed evenly on the cell surface. After antigen activation, integrin, especially LFA-1, accumulates at the interface between a T cell and an antigen-presenting cell (APC), resulting in high avidity to enhance ligand binding.15 Not only is LFA-1 accumulated at the interface of a T–APC conjugate, but it is also highly rearranged, together with other important T-cell surface receptors such as T-cell receptor (TCR)/CD3, to form the immunological synapse that is also termed supramolecular activation cluster (SMAC). Engaged TCRs translocate to the centre of the contact area to form the central SMAC and a ring of LFA-1 forms the peripheral SMAC with the cytoskeleton protein talin. Although the role of the immunological synapse formation in T-cell activation is still unclear, it is generally accepted that the immunological synapse facilitates the translocation of cytolytic granules during the killing of targets by cytolytic T lymphocytes or natural killer cells.16,17 Similarly, LFA-1 also contributes to the formation of virological synapses that enhance the transmission of viruses, such as human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1 or HIV-1 between infected and non-infected cells.18
Molecular mechanisms of integrin activation
To bind to integrin ligands, integrin needs to be converted to an active state. Activation of integrin is a highly regulated process. Stimuli received from cell surface receptors, including TCR or B-cell receptors, and chemokine receptors, could generate intracellular signals to activate integrins; this is termed ‘inside-out’ signalling. On the other hand, the binding of integrin extracelluar domains to ligands or other agonists (stimulatory antibody, PMA, Mg2+ or Mn2+), and physiological force exerted on the bond, could initiate conformational change of the integrin, which then sends biochemical and mechanical signalling into the cell to regulate multiple cellular functions; this is termed ‘outside-in’ signalling.12,13 In T cells, integrin bidirectional signals lead to the formation of the immunological synapse, stabilization of T-cell–APC contact to facilitate T-cell activation, proliferation and cytokine secretion (e.g. interleukin-2, interferon-γ).19–21 In macrophages, integrin activation induces cytoskeletal rearrangement during the process of phagocytosis, cytokine mRNA stabilization (e.g. interleukin-1β) and cell differentiation.22 Integrin signalling also enhances neutrophil degranulation and activation of NADPH oxidase, leading to production of reactive oxygen species,23 or induces polarization of cytolytic granules in natural killer cells or cytolytic T lymphocytes.24 In the following discussion, we will describe those key effectors involved in integrin bidirectional signalling pathways, with particular attention to the signalling molecules in T lymphocytes.
Initiation of integrin activation by early TCR signalling
After the TCR/CD3 complex is engaged with the MHC–peptide complex, Src kinase (lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase; LCK) is phosphorylated and activated, leading to phosphorylation of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs on the TCRξ/CD3 chains. Kinase ζ-associated protein of molecular weight 70 000 (ZAP-70) is recruited to the TCR/CD3 complex and is phosphorylated by LCK. Activated ZAP-70 then phosphorylates a number of downstream adaptors, including linker for activation of T cells (LAT) and Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing leucocyte protein of molecular weight 76 000 (SLP-76) (Fig. 1). Elevated levels of LCK in cloned cytolytic T cells markedly increase cytolytic activity and enhance LFA-1 expression levels with increased cell binding to the ligand intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1).25 In LCK-deficient Jurkat cells (i.e. JCaM1.6 cells) or in Src kinase inhibitor PP2-treated Jurkat cells, CD3 ligation-induced adhesion to ICAM-1 is dramatically reduced.26 These studies suggest that LCK is a positive regulator for integrin activation. Similarly, ZAP-70-deficient Jurkat cells fail in TCR-induced integrin β1-mediated adhesion and the kinase activity of ZAP-70 required for LAT phosphorylation is crucial for integrin activation.27 This fits with the defective integrin activation and adhesion in LAT-deficient Jurkat cells. Further, LAT is associated directly or indirectly with a number of key signalling proteins, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, the inducible T-cell kinase (ITK), SLP-76, and phospholipase C-γ1 (Fig. 1). These kinases, adaptors or enzymes have been implicated to play critical roles in TCR-induced ‘inside-out’ signalling for integrin activation.28
The SLP-76–VAV1 complex
The protein SLP-76 is an important adaptor protein downstream of the LAT–Gads (Grb2-related adaptor downstream of Shc) complex in T cells (Fig. 1) and has been demonstrated as a positive regulator for T-cell development and cell activation. SLP-76-deficient mice show a T-cell developmental block at the double-negative stage, whereas the SLP-76-deficient T-cell line shows impaired phosphorylation of phospholipase C-γ1 and defective Ras pathway activation.29–31 Importantly, SLP-76 has been implicated in the regulation of integrin adhesion in both ‘inside-out’ signalling and ‘outside-in’ signalling in multiple cell types. SLP-76-deficient T cells could not adhere to integrin β1 ligand fibronectin after TCR stimulation via the ‘inside-out’ signalling. Further, in response to ligand-induced ‘outside-in’ signalling, SLP-76-deficient platelets fail to spread on integrin β3 ligand fibrinogen-coated plates,32,33 and SLP-76-deficient neutrophils fail to spread and produce reactive oxygen intermediates after integrin ligand simulation.34 Interestingly, the upstream effectors LAT and Gads do not seem to play a role because the Gads-binding domain of SLP-76 seems to be dispensable for platelet spreading on fibrinogen, and LAT-deficient platelets aggregate and spread normally in response to integrin stimulation in the ‘outside-in’ signalling.35
As a central scaffolding protein, SLP-76 is associated with a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Vav1 after being phosphorylated by ZAP-70 and SYK.36–38 Similar to the role of SLP-76, Vav1 mediates integrin β1 and β2 activation in T cells, neutrophils and platelets via both ‘inside-out’ and ‘outside-in’ pathways. Vav1-deficient cells are impaired in cell adhesion, spreading and production of reactive oxygen intermediates in response to integrin ligand stimulation in the ‘outside-in’ signalling.39–42 Also, Vav1 mediates TCR-induced integrin clustering and T–APC conjugate formation via ‘inside-out’ signalling.41 As a GEF, Vav1 activates the GTPase Rac1, which regulates adhesion by directly controlling the balance between actin-mediated protrusion and myosin II-mediated contraction through interacting with the WASP/WAVE complex and activating the ARP2/3 complex (Fig. 1).43–45 Other GEFs including DOCK180 (dedicator of cytokinesis 180), DOCK8 also regulate integrin adhesion, which activate the GTPase Rac1 or Cdc42.46
The SLP-76–ADAP–SKAP-55 complex
Upon activation, SLP-76 also interacts with adhesion and degranulation promoting adaptor protein (ADAP) via its phosphorylated tyrosines.47 The SLP-76–ADAP interaction regulates integrin-initiated ‘outside-in’ signalling.48 Disruption in the interaction between SLP-76 and ADAP blocks T-cell spreading and migration in the ligand ICAM-1-coated surface.49,50 Similar to ‘outside-in’ signalling in other cells, the upstream LAT–Gads complex is not required for the SLP-76–ADAP module-induced ‘outside-in’ signalling in T cells.49 In TCR-induced ‘inside-out’ signalling, ADAP-deficient T cells have shown impaired integrin β1 and β2-mediated cell adhesion, LFA-1 clustering and the formation of T–APC conjugates. This defect in adhesion is accompanied by reduced T-cell proliferation and interleukin-2 production.51–53 Defects in T-cell selection have also been documented in certain ADAP-deficient transgenic models expressing a single TCR.54 ADAP binds directly to Src kinase-associated protein of molecular weight 55 000 (SKAP) by the interaction of the SKAP-55 SH3 domain to a proline-rich region in ADAP or the interaction of the ADAP SH3c domain to a tyrosine-based RKXXYXXY motif in SKAP-55 (Fig. 1).55–58 SKAP-55 is expressed in a restricted manner in T cells as a positive regulator for integrin activation, T-cell adhesion and T–APC conjugate formation.51,59,60 The role of SKAP-55 in the regulation of integrin activation could not be replaced by its homologue protein SKAP-55-related (SKAP-55R, also termed SKAP-55 Hom).59,61 Disruption of the ADAP–SKAP-55 module by deletion of the SKAP-55 SH3 domain or the ADAP proline-rich domain impairs formation of T–APC conjugates, LFA-1 adhesion and may prevent the membrane translocation of small G protein Rap1, a key player of integrin activation.51,62
The SKAP-55–RapL/RIAM–Rap1 complex to integrins
Although important for integrin activation, SLP-76, ADAP and SKAP-55 do not interact with integrin directly. Recently, we have identified that the ADAP–SKAP-55 module comprises a complex with the Rap1–RapL module after TCR stimulation. It has been demonstrated that RapL binds activated Rap1 after TCR or chemokine stimulation, and this interaction brings RapL close to the cell membrane to allow direct binding of the RapL to the cytoplasmic domain of the αL chain of LFA-1 (Fig. 1). RapL-deficient T or B cells are defective in cell adhesion and trafficking. We found that the N-terminal domain of SKAP-55 binds to the C-terminal SARAH domain of RapL, resulting in the formation of an SKAP-55–RapL–Rap1 complex that binds to LFA-1 and increases adhesion to ICAM-1. The Rap1–RapL complex formation and LFA-1 binding fail to occur in SKAP-55-deficient T cells. By contrast, chemokines SDF1 and CCL21 induce normal migration of SKAP-55-deficient T cells.63 Hence, SKAP-55 appears to serve as a specific adaptor to couple the TCR with the activation of the Rap1–RapL module for integrin adhesion.
Another Rap1–GTP binding partner is Rap1–GTP-interacting adapter molecule (RIAM). Over-expression of RIAM increases cell spreading, lamellipod formation, integrin activation and adhesion.64 It has been shown that RIAM constitutively interacts with SKAP-55, and that the ADAP–SKAP-55 module promotes the membrane location of the RIAM–Rap1 module following TCR activation to facilitate integrin activation.65 In addition, the ability of RIAM to bind to profilin, Ena/VASP proteins and talin suggests that RIAM promotes integrin activation through effects on the actin cytoskeleton, particularly the interaction of talin with integrin cytoplasmic tails (Fig. 1).
Talin and kindlin interactions to integrins
Talin is a cytoskeletal protein consisting of an N-terminal FERM domain (protein4.1, ezrin, radixin and moesin) with three subdomains (F1, F2, F3), which binds integrin cytoplasmic tails (Fig. 1) and a large C-terminal rod domain that binds actin.66,67 The F3 subdomain contains a phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain that binds the integrin β subunit tail at the membrane-proximal NXXY site.67 Talin is enriched at the leading edge of chemokine-stimulated lymphocytes and in the immunological synapse together with LFA-1, vinculin and F-actin.68 Hence, talin acts as a bridge to link the extracellular matrix and the actin skeletal network.
Kindlin is another essential player that binds differently to the integrin β subunit tail at the membrane-distal NXXY site and activates integrin (Fig. 1). Kindlin is named after the Kindler syndrome which is a kind of skin blistering disease caused by a kindlin-1 gene mutation.69 The kindlin family has three members, including kindlin-1 (Unc-112-related protein 1, URP1), kindlin-2 (Mig2) and kindlin-3 (URP-2), which all have a conserved FERM domain composed of four subdomains. Among them, kindlin-3 is expressed exclusively in cells of haematopoietic origin. The FERM subdomain 2 in kindlin-3 is featured by a pleckstrin homology domain that is involved in membrane binding,70 and subdomain 3 in kindlin-3, which binds the distal motif of integrin β1, β2 and β3 tails.71–73 Mutations in kindlin-3 result in defective integrin activation in leucocytes and platelets and lead to leucocyte adhesion deficiency III.74 Kindlins are not sufficient to induce integrins to a high-affinity state, but they can promote the binding of talins to integrin tails. Talin is also not sufficient to increase integrin affinity without the aid of kindlin.
Other actin-associated proteins have also been identified to interact with integrins. Paxillin is a cytoskeletal phosphotyrosine-containing protein and binds directly to the cytoplamic domain of integrin α4.75 The interaction is regulated in a protein kinase A-dependent manner. Phosphorylation of the α4 cytoplasmic domain at serine988 leads to release of paxillin from integrin.76 It mediates initial capture and rolling interactions during leucocyte migration on vascular cell adhesion molecule 1-expressing and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1-expressing vascular endothelium.77
Conclusions
Integrins play many essential roles in leucocytes and many key players in both ‘inside-out’ and ‘outside-in’ pathways have been well characterized since the middle 1980s. However, challenging questions remain. One major question is how different integrins coordinate with other surface receptors in different cell types to regulate cellular functions when responding to various agonists including antigens, chemokines, selectins and others. For example, the MHC–peptide complex binding to TCR induces ‘inside-out’ signalling for LFA-1 activation and LFA-1 co-ligation further acts as a ‘co-stimulator’ for T-cell proliferation, calcium mobilization and lytic effect cell induction.78 After binding of the bacterial product lipopolysaccharide to Toll-like receptor 4, integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) could also be activated in macrophages. However, in contrast to the positive role of LFA-1 in T-cell activation, integrin Mac-1 plays a negative role to reduce Toll-like receptor-mediated signalling and limits inflammation.79 Further, new functions of integrins in leucocytes are emerging. Integrin α4β7 in mucosal T cells binds directly with the V2 loop of gp120 in HIV-1, which results in rapid activation of LFA-1 to facilitate the formation of virological synapses and efficient cell-to-cell spreading of HIV-1. Blocking the interaction of integrin α4β7 with gp120 via a peptide could significantly reduce HIV-1 entry into T cells.80 ITK, which regulates integrin activation, can enhance HIV-1 entry and transmission between cells.81 Integrin αEβ7 (CD103) has also been identified in regulatory T (Treg) cells but plays no mandatory role for Treg-cell-mediated control of colitis.82 Signalling proteins Rap1 and protein kinase C-θ (PKC-θ) which affect integrin activation might regulate Treg-cell function.83,84 With more detailed understanding of the role of different integrins in different cell types, we would target specific integrins with blocking antibodies, RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) peptides or small molecules in the treatment of various diseases. For example, blocking antibody to α4-integrin has shown some degree of success in multiple sclerosis and in inflammatory bowel disease.9 However, there are some remaining concerns, including the possibility that blocking integrin function would generally compromise the immune system's ability to fight against infection or that diseases might relapse upon cessation of blockade of integrins. It is therefore important to understand the underlying molecular mechanism of how integrin function is regulated, and this might provide us with new specific targets through which to treat integrin-related diseases.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2011CB505005 and 2012CB910800), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31070778), the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (11PJ1410700).
Disclosures
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 1.Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110:673–87. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00971-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang JT, Rayburn H, Hynes RO. Embryonic mesodermal defects in α5 integrin-deficient mice. Development. 1993;119:1093–105. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.4.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang JT, Rayburn H, Hynes RO. Cell adhesion events mediated by α4 integrins are essential in placental and cardiac development. Development. 1995;121:549–60. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.2.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Georges-Labouesse E, Messaddeq N, Yehia G, Cadalbert L, Dierich A, Le Meur M. Absence of integrin α6 leads to epidermolysis bullosa and neonatal death in mice. Nat Genet. 1996;13:370–3. doi: 10.1038/ng0796-370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kreidberg JA, Donovan MJ, Goldstein SL, Rennke H, Shepherd K, Jones RC, Jaenisch R. α3β1 integrin has a crucial role in kidney and lung organogenesis. Development. 1996;122:3537–47. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.11.3537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Luo BH, Carman CV, Springer TA. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:619–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuijpers TW, vanLier RAW, Hamann D, deBoer M, Thung LY, Weening RS, Verhoeven AJ, Roos D. Leukocyte adhesion deficiency type 1 (LAD-1)/variant – a novel immunodeficiency syndrome characterized by dysfunctional β2 integrins. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:1725–33. doi: 10.1172/JCI119697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lebwohl M, Tyring SK, Hamilton TK, et al. A novel targeted T-cell modulator, efalizumab, for plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2004–13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miller DH, Khan OA, Sheremata WA, et al. A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:15–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim M, Carman CV, Springer TA. Bidirectional transmembrane signaling by cytoplasmic domain separation in integrins. Science. 2003;301:1720–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1084174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.del Rio A, Perez-Jimenez R, Liu R, Roca-Cusachs P, Fernandez JM, Sheetz MP. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science. 2009;323:638–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1162912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Friedland JC, Lee MH, Boettiger D. Mechanically activated integrin switch controls α5β1 function. Science. 2009;323:642–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1168441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alon R, Ley K. Cells on the run: shear-regulated integrin activation in leukocyte rolling and arrest on endothelial cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:525–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kong F, Garcia AJ, Mould AP, Humphries MJ, Zhu C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J Cell Biol. 2009;185:1275–84. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.van Kooyk Y, Figdor CG. Avidity regulation of integrins: the driving force in leukocyte adhesion. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:542–7. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stinchcombe JC, Bossi G, Booth S, Griffiths GM. The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. Immunity. 2001;15:751–61. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00234-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Orange JS. Formation and function of the lytic NK-cell immunological synapse. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:713–25. doi: 10.1038/nri2381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Igakura T, Stinchcombe JC, Goon PKC, et al. Spread of HTLV-I between lymphocytes by virus-induced polarization of the cytoskeleton. Science. 2003;299:1713–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1080115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wacholtz MC, Patel SS, Lipsky PE. Leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 is an activation molecule for human T-cells. J Exp Med. 1989;170:431–48. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.2.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kanner SB, Grosmaire LS, Ledbetter JA, Damle NK. β-2-Integrin LFA-1 signaling through phospholipase C- γ-1 activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:7099–103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang H, McCann FE, Gordan JD, Wu X, Raab M, Malik TH, Davis DM, Rudd CE. ADAP-SLP-76 binding differentially regulates supramolecular activation cluster (SMAC) formation relative to T cell-APC conjugation. J Exp Med. 2004;200:1063–74. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Le Cabec V, Carreno S, Moisand A, Bordier C, Maridonneau-Parini I. Complement receptor 3 (CD11b/CD18) mediates type I and type II phagocytosis during nonopsonic and opsonic phagocytosis, respectively. J Immunol. 2002;169:2003–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.4.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mocsai A, Abram CL, Jakus Z, Hu YM, Lanier LL, Lowell CA. Integrin signaling in neutrophils and macrophages uses adaptors containing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:1326–33. doi: 10.1038/ni1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Long EO, Gross CC, Brzostowski JA, Liu DF. Tethering of intercellular adhesion molecule on target cells is required for LFA-1-dependent NK cell adhesion and granule polarization. J Immunol. 2010;185:2918–26. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Torigoe T, Millan JA, Chan KW, Taichman R, Brian AA, Reed JC, Tachman R. Protein tyrosine kinase p56-Lck regulates lymphocyte function-associated 1 adhesion molecule expression, granule exocytosis, and cytolytic effector function in a cloned T cell. J Exp Med. 1994;180:1115–27. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.3.1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fagerholm S, Hilden TJ, Gahmberg CG. Lck tyrosine kinase is important for activation of the CD11a/CD18-integrins in human T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32:1670–8. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200206)32:6<1670::AID-IMMU1670>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Goda S, Quale AC, Woods ML, Felthauser A, Shimizu Y. Control of TCR-mediated activation of β1 integrins by the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase interdomain B region and the linker for activation of T cells adapter protein. J Immunol. 2004;172:5379–87. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.9.5379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Burbach BJ, Medeiros RB, Mueller KL, Shimizu Y. T-cell receptor signaling to integrins. Immunol Rev. 2007;218:65–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00527.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Clements JL, Yang B, Ross-Barta SE, Eliason SL, Hrstka RF, Williamson RA, Koretzky GA. Requirement for the leukocyte-specific adapter protein SLP-76 for normal T-cell development. Science. 1998;281:416–9. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5375.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pivniouk V, Tsitsikov E, Swinton P, Rathbun G, Alt FW, Geha RS. Impaired viability and profound block in thymocyte development in mice lacking the adaptor protein SLP-76. Cell. 1998;94:229–38. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81422-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yablonski D, Kuhne MR, Kadlecek T, Weiss A. Uncoupling of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases from PLC-γ1 in an SLP-76-deficient T cell. Science. 1998;281:413–6. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5375.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Judd BA, Myung PS, Leng L, Obergfell A, Pear WS, Shattil SJ, Koretzky GA. Hematopoietic reconstitution of SLP-76 corrects hemostasis and platelet signaling through αIIbβ3 and collagen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:12056–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.12056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Obergfell A, Judd BA, del Pozo MA, Schwartz MA, Koretzky GA, Shattil SJ. The molecular adapter SLP-76 relays signals from platelet integrin αIIbβ3 to the actin cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:5916–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010639200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Newbrough SA, Mocsai A, Clemens RA, Wu JN, Silverman MA, Singer AL, Lowell CA, Koretzky GA. SLP-76 regulates Fcγ receptor and integrin signaling in neutrophils. Immunity. 2003;19:761–9. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00305-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Judd BA, Myung PS, Obergfell A, et al. Differential requirement for LAT and SLP-76 in GPVI versus T cell receptor signaling. J Exp Med. 2002;195:705–17. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wu J, Motto DG, Koretzky GA, Weiss A. Vav and SLP-76 interact and functionally cooperate in IL-2 gene activation. Immunity. 1996;4:593–602. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80485-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Raab M, da Silva AJ, Findell PR, Rudd CE. Regulation of Vav-SLP-76 binding by ZAP-70 and its relevance to TCRξ/CD3 induction of interleukin-2. Immunity. 1997;6:155–64. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80422-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gross BS, Lee JR, Clements JL, Turner M, Tybulewicz VLJ, Findell PR, Koretzky GA, Watson SP. Tyrosine phosphorylation of SLP-76 is downstream of Syk following stimulation of the collagen receptor in platelets. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:5963–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gakidis MA, Cullere X, Olson T, et al. Vav GEFs are required for β2 integrin-dependent functions of neutrophils. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:273–82. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200404166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Graham DB, Robertson CM, Bautista J, et al. Neutrophil-mediated oxidative burst and host defense are controlled by a Vav-PLCγ2 signaling axis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3445–52. doi: 10.1172/JCI32729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Krawczyk C, Oliveira-dos-Santos A, Sasaki T, Griffiths E, Ohashi PS, Snapper S, Alt F, Penninger JM. Vav1 controls integrin clustering and MHC/peptide-specific cell adhesion to antigen-presenting cells. Immunity. 2002;16:331–43. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00291-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pearce AC, McCarty OJ, Calaminus SD, Vigorito E, Turner M, Watson SP. Vav family proteins are required for optimal regulation of PLCγ2 by integrin αIIbβ3. Biochem J. 2007;401:753–61. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:247–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.150721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nobes CD, Hall A. Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell. 1995;81:53–62. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kovacs EM, Yap AS. The web and the rock: cell adhesion and the ARP2/3 complex. Dev Cell. 2002;3:760–1. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00374-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Randall KL, Lambe T, Johnson AL, et al. Dock8 mutations cripple B cell immunological synapses, germinal centers and long-lived antibody production. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:1283–91. doi: 10.1038/ni.1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.daSilva AJ, Li ZW, DeVera C, Canto E, Findell P, Rudd CE. Cloning of a novel T-cell protein FYB that binds FYN and SH2-domain-containing leukocyte protein 76 and modulates interleukin 2 production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:7493–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rudd CE. Adaptors and molecular scaffolds in immune cell signaling. Cell. 1999;96:5–8. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80953-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Baker RG, Hsu CJ, Lee D, Jordan MS, Maltzman JS, Hammer DA, Baumgart T, Koretzky GA. The adapter protein SLP-76 mediates “outside-in” integrin signaling and function in T cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:5578–89. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00283-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang H, Wei B, Bismuth G, Rudd CE. SLP-76-ADAP adaptor module regulates LFA-1 mediated costimulation and T cell motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:12436–41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900510106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang H, Moon EY, Azouz A, Wu X, Smith A, Schneider H, Hogg N, Rudd CE. SKAP-55 regulates integrin adhesion and formation of T cell-APC conjugates. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:366–74. doi: 10.1038/ni913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Griffiths EK, Krawczyk C, Kong YY, et al. Positive regulation of T cell activation and integrin adhesion by the adapter Fyb/Slap. Science. 2001;293:2260–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1063397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Peterson EJ, Woods ML, Dmowski SA, et al. Coupling of the TCR to integrin activation by Slap-130/Fyb. Science. 2001;293:2263–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1063486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wu JN, Gheith S, Bezman NA, et al. Adhesion- and degranulation-promoting adapter protein is required for efficient thymocyte development and selection. J Immunol. 2006;176:6681–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.6681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.daSilva AJ, Rosenfield JM, Mueller I, Bouton A, Hirai H, Rudd CE. Biochemical analysis of p120/130 – a protein-tyrosine kinase substrate restricted to T and myeloid cells. J Immunol. 1997;158:2007–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kang H, Freund C, Duke-Cohan JS, Musacchio A, Wagner G, Rudd CE. SH3 domain recognition of a proline-independent tyrosine-based RKxxYxxY motif in immune cell adaptor SKAP55. EMBO J. 2000;19:2889–99. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.12.2889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu J, Kang H, Raab M, da Silva AJ, Kraeft SK, Rudd CE. FYB (FYN binding protein) serves as a binding partner for lymphoid protein and FYN kinase substrate SKAP55 and a SKAP55-related protein in T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:8779–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Duke-Cohan JS, Kang H, Liu H, Rudd CE. Regulation and function of SKAP-55 non-canonical motif binding to the SH3c domain of adhesion and degranulation-promoting adaptor protein. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:13743–50. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508774200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jo EK, Wang H, Rudd CE. An essential role for SKAP-55 in LFA-1 clustering on T cells that cannot be substituted by SKAP-55R. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1733–9. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang H, Liu H, Lu Y, Lovatt M, Wei B, Rudd CE. Functional defects of SKAP-55-deficient T cells identify a regulatory role for the adaptor in LFA-1 adhesion. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:6863–75. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00556-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Marie-Cardine A, Verhagen AM, Eckerskorn C, Schraven B. SKAP-HOM, a novel adaptor protein homologous to the FYN-associated protein SKAP55. FEBS Lett. 1998;435:55–60. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kliche S, Breitling D, Togni M, et al. The ADAP/SKAP55 signaling module regulates T-cell receptor-mediated integrin activation through plasma membrane targeting of Rap1. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:7130–44. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00331-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang H, Lu Y, Rudd CE. SKAP1 is dispensable for chemokine-induced migration of primary T-cells. Immunol Lett. 2010;128:148–53. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lafuente EM, van Puijenbroek AA, Krause M, et al. RIAM, an Ena/VASP and Profilin ligand, interacts with Rap1-GTP and mediates Rap1-induced adhesion. Dev Cell. 2004;7:585–95. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Menasche G, Kliche S, Chen EJ, Stradal TE, Schraven B, Koretzky G. RIAM links the ADAP/SKAP-55 signaling module to Rap1, facilitating T-cell-receptor-mediated integrin activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:4070–81. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02011-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chishti AH, Kim AC, Marfatia SM, et al. The FERM domain: a unique module involved in the linkage of cytoplasmic proteins to the membrane. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:281–2. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01237-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Garcia-Alvarez B, de Pereda JM, Calderwood DA, Ulmer TS, Critchley D, Campbell ID, Ginsberg MH, Liddington RC. Structural determinants of integrin recognition by talin. Mol Cell. 2003;11:49–58. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00823-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Billadeau DD, Nolz JC, Gomez TS. Regulation of T-cell activation by the cytoskeleton. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:131–43. doi: 10.1038/nri2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Siegel DH, Ashton GH, Penagos HG, et al. Loss of kindlin-1, a human homolog of the Caenorhabditis elegans actin-extracellular-matrix linker protein UNC-112, causes Kindler syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:174–87. doi: 10.1086/376609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Moser M, Legate KR, Zent R, Fassler R. The tail of integrins, talin, and kindlins. Science. 2009;324:895–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1163865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Moser M, Schmidt S, Nakchbandi I, et al. Kindlin-3-mediated signaling from multiple integrin classes is required for osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. J Cell Biol. 2011;192:883–97. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Fassler R, Moser M, Bauer M, et al. Kindlin-3 is required for β2 integrin-mediated leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells. Nat Med. 2009;15:300–5. doi: 10.1038/nm.1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Moser M, Nieswandt B, Ussar S, Pozgajova M, Fassler R. Kindlin-3 is essential for integrin activation and platelet aggregation. Nat Med. 2008;14:325–30. doi: 10.1038/nm1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hogg N, Svensson L, Howarth K, et al. Leukocyte adhesion deficiency-III is caused by mutations in KINDLIN3 affecting integrin activation. Nat Med. 2009;15:306–12. doi: 10.1038/nm.1931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ginsberg MH, Liu S, Thomas SM, Woodside DG, Rose DM, Kiosses WB, Pfaff M. Binding of paxillin to α4 integrins modifies integrin-dependent biological responses. Nature. 1999;402:676–81. doi: 10.1038/45264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Han J, Liu S, Rose DM, Schlaepfer DD, McDonald H, Ginsberg MH. Phosphorylation of the integrin α4 cytoplasmic domain regulates paxillin binding. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:40903–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102665200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Alon R, Feigelson SW, Manevich E, et al. α4β1-dependent adhesion strengthening under mechanical strain is regulated by paxillin association with the α4-cytoplasmic domain. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:1073–84. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200503155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bachmann MF, McKall-Faienza K, Schmits R, Bouchard D, Beach J, Speiser DE, Mak TW, Ohashi PS. Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. Immunity. 1997;7:549–57. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80376-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Han C, Jin J, Xu S, Liu H, Li N, Cao X. Integrin CD11b negatively regulates TLR-triggered inflammatory responses by activating Syk and promoting degradation of MyD88 and TRIF via Cbl-b. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:734–42. doi: 10.1038/ni.1908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Arthos J, Cicala C, Martinelli E, et al. HIV-1 envelope protein binds to and signals through integrin α4β7, the gut mucosal homing receptor for peripheral T cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:301–9. doi: 10.1038/ni1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Readinger JA, Schiralli GM, Jiang JK, Thomas CJ, August A, Henderson AJ, Schwartzberg PL. Selective targeting of ITK blocks multiple steps of HIV replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:6684–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709659105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Annacker O, Coombes JL, Malmstrom V, et al. Essential role for CD103 in the T cell-mediated regulation of experimental colitis. J Exp Med. 2005;202:1051–61. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Li L, Kim J, Boussiotis VA. Rap1A regulates generation of T regulatory cells via LFA-1-dependent and LFA-1-independent mechanisms. Cell Immunol. 2010;266:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zanin-Zhorov A, Ding Y, Kumari S, et al. Protein kinase C-θ mediates negative feedback on regulatory T cell function. Science. 2010;328:372–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1186068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Balkow S, Heinz S, Schmidbauer P, Kolanus W, Holzmann B, Grabbe S, Laschinger M. LFA-1 activity state on dendritic cells regulates contact duration with T cells and promotes T-cell priming. Blood. 2010;116:1885–94. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-224428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Carrasco YR, Fleire SJ, Cameron T, Dustin ML, Batista FD. LFA-1/ICAM-1 interaction lowers the threshold of B cell activation by facilitating B cell adhesion and synapse formation. Immunity. 2004;20:589–99. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00105-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Humphries MJ, Humphries JD, Byron A. Integrin ligands at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:3901–3. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Plow EF, Zhang L. A MAC-1 attack: integrin functions directly challenged in knockout mice. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1145–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI119267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Yakubenko VP, Belevych N, Mishchuk D, Schurin A, Lam SC, Ugarova TP. The role of integrin αDβ2 (CD11d/CD18) in monocyte/macrophage migration. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:2569–78. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Arroyo AG, Yang JT, Rayburn H, Hynes RO. Differential requirements for α4 integrins during fetal and adult hematopoiesis. Cell. 1996;85:997–1008. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81301-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Jin H, Su J, Garmy-Susini B, Kleeman J, Varner J. Integrin α4β1 promotes monocyte trafficking and angiogenesis in tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2146–52. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Randolph GJ, Ochando J, Partida-Sanchez S. Migration of dendritic cell subsets and their precursors. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:293–316. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Walsh GM, Symon FA, Lazarovils AL, Wardlaw AJ. Integrin α4β7 mediates human eosinophil interaction with MAdCAM-1, VCAM-1 and fibronectin. Immunology. 1996;89:112–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1996.d01-713.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299:1057–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1079490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Le Floc'h A, Jalil A, Vergnon I, Le Maux Chansac B, Lazar V, Bismuth G, Chouaib S, Mami-Chouaib F. αEβ7 integrin interaction with E-cadherin promotes antitumor CTL activity by triggering lytic granule polarization and exocytosis. J Exp Med. 2007;204:559–70. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Tiisala S, Paavonen T, Renkonen R. αEβ7 and α4β7 integrins associated with intraepithelial and mucosal homing, are expressed on macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:411–7. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Bishop GG, McPherson JA, Sanders JM, et al. Selective αvβ3-receptor blockade reduces macrophage infiltration and restenosis after balloon angioplasty in the atherosclerotic rabbit. Circulation. 2001;103:1906–11. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.14.1906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Guermonprez P, Valladeau J, Zitvogel L, Thery C, Amigorena S. Antigen presentation and T cell stimulation by dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:621–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]