Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology logoLink to Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology
. 2011 Mar 25;1(3):232–239. doi: 10.1007/s13193-011-0057-7

Early Results of an Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

Naomi Sakamoto 1,✉, Eisuke Fukuma 1, Kuniki Higa 2, Shinji Ozaki 1, Masaaki Sakamoto 1, Satoko Abe 1, Terumasa Kurihara 1, Mitsuhiro Tozaki 1
PMCID: PMC3372951  PMID: 22695768

Abstract

Background.

Endoscopic mastectomy has been reportedly associated with smaller scars and greater patient satisfaction; however, few reports on this topic have been made. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine the early results of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (ENSM) and to investigate the safety of this procedure.

Methods.

Between January 2002 and December 2005, a total of 87 patients with breast cancer but without skin and nipple involvement, including two cases of bilateral breast cancer, underwent E-NSM. In case of bloody nipple discharge and suspicious extension near the nipple as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, the major ducts within the nipple were cored (nipple coring). In other cases, nipple coring was not performed.

Results.

Of the 89 breasts in 87 patients, 42 had tumors of >2 cm and 80 were diagnosed as having invasive carcinoma. Lymph node involvement was observed in 36 procedures. The overall rate of nipple necrosis was 18% (16 of 89). The rate of nipple necrosis among the procedures with nipple coring was statistically higher than that among those without nipple coring (7 of 17, 41%, vs. 9 of 72, 13%) (P = .01). Nipple involvement was observed in 2.2% (2 of 89). After a median follow-up period of 52 months, distant metastasis was observed in nine cases; no local recurrences occurred in this series.

Conclusions.

E-NSM is an oncologically safe procedure and an acceptable method in selected patients requiring a mastectomy. The higher rate of nipple necrosis may have been the result of a technical problem, indicating the need for continued improvement in nipple coring procedures.

Footnotes

This article was originally published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, volume 16, pp. 3406–3413, DOI 10.1245/s10434-009-0661-8.

References

  • 1.Smith J, Payne WS, Carney JA. Involvement of the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:546–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, et al. Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer. Cancer. 1985;15:2459–63. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850515)55:10<2459::AID-CNCR2820551025>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luttges J, Kalbfleisch H, Prinz P. Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987;113:481–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00390043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Santini D, Taffurelli M, Gelli MC, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 1989;158:399–403. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90272-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS. Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:15–6. doi: 10.1016/S0748-7983(98)80117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13. doi: 10.1007/s10434-999-0609-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cense HA, Rutgers EJ. Lopes Cardozo M, Van Lanschot JJ. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:521–6. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:165–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02557369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000077922.38307.cd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:240–4. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000171680.49971.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chung AP, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: where are we now? Surg Oncol. 2008;17:261–6. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR, Jr, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457–63. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kissin MW, Kark AE. Nipple preservation during mastectomy. Br J Surg. 1987;74:58–61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caruso F, Ferrara M, Castiglione G, et al. Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:937–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3396–401. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0102-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;96:47–51. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Psaila A, Pozzi M, Barone Adesi L, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a short term analysis of our experience. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2006;25:309–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:97–101. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9968-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kompatscher P. Endoscopic capsulotomy of capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a very challenging therapeutic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:1125–6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199212000-00049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eaves FF., 3rd Bostwick J 3rd, Nahai F, et al. Endoscopic techniques in aesthetic breast surgery. Augmentation, mastectomy, biopsy, capsulotomy, capsulorrhaphy, reduction, mastopexy, and reconstructive techniques. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22:683–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Howard PS, Oslin BD, Moore JR. Endoscopic transaxillary submuscular augmentation mammaplasty with textured saline breast implants. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;37:12–7. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199607000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Faria-Correa MA. Endoscopic abdominoplasty, mastopexy, and breast reduction. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22:723–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kitamura K, Hashizume M, Kataoka A, et al. Transaxillary approach for the endoscopic extirpation of benign breast tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:277–9. doi: 10.1097/00019509-199808000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kitamura K, Ishida M, Inoue H, et al. Early results of an endoscope-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer. Surgery. 2002;131:324–9. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.120120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan AC. Endoscopic-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and axillary dissection with immediate mammary prosthesis reconstruction for early breast cancer. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:302–6. doi: 10.1007/s004640000203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nakajima H, Sakaguchi K, Mizuta N, et al. Video-assisted total glandectomy and immediate reconstruction for breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56:205–8. doi: 10.1016/S0753-3322(02)00281-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fukuma E. Endoscopic breast surgery for breast cancer. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;107:64–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ito K, Kanai T, Gomi K, et al. Endoscopic-assisted skin-sparing mastectomy combined with sentinel node biopsy. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:894–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04687.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Salvat J, Knopf JF, Ayoubi JM, et al. Endoscopic exploration and lymph node sampling of the axilla. Preliminary findings of a randomized pilot study comparing clinical and anatomo-pathologic results of endoscopic axillary lymph node sampling with traditional surgical treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;70:165–73. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(95)02587-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tamaki Y, Nakano Y, Sekimoto M, et al. Transaxillary endoscopic partial mastectomy for comparatively early-stage breast cancer. An early experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:308–12. doi: 10.1097/00019509-199808000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yamashita K, Shimizu K. Endoscopic video-assisted breast surgery: procedures and short-term results. J Nippon Med Sch. 2006;73:193–202. doi: 10.1272/jnms.73.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg. 2008;143:38–45. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.1.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, et al. Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1356–61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1341–7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9753-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Komorowski AL, Zanini V, Regolo L, et al. Necrotic complications after nipple-and areola-sparing mastectomy. World J Surg. 2006;30:1410–3. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0650-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES