Abstract
A series of 3-benzylamino-3-desoxymorphinan (I) and 3-benzylamino-3-desoxymorphine (II) derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their binding affinities and functional activity data are presented at MOR, KOR, and DOR. Some of these ligands were found to have high binding affinity at MOR and KOR, and displayed increased selectivity at MOR over KOR and DOR compared to butorphan or cyclorphan. The most selective compound, 3-(3′-hydroxybenzyl)amino-17-methylmorphinan (4g) (24-fold MOR to KOR and 1700-fold MOR to DOR) also showed high binding affinity (0.42 nM to MOR), and was a full agonist in the [35S]GTPγS binding assay. 2-(3′-Hydroxybenzyl)amino-17-cyclopropylmethylmorphinan (17) was found to be a KOR-selective ligand (150-fold over MOR and >10,000-fold over the DORs). Most 3-benzylaminomorphinan derivatives were partial agonists at MOR and full agonists at KOR in the [35S]GTPγS binding assay.
Introduction
Morphine is still the drug of choice for treating severe pain caused by trauma.1 However, morphine has serious side effects, including constipation, respiratory depression, dependence, tolerance, and addiction. Most clinically available opioid analgesics have MOR selective affinity, such as sufentanil,2 which is 600- to 800-fold more potent than morphine, with 100-fold selectivity for MOR over other opioid receptors.2b The most commonly used centrally acting analgesics, hydrocodone3 and oxycodone4 have only about one-tenth the affinity to KOR and DOR as morphine, with good selectivity at MOR.
The free phenolic hydroxyl group in morphine, cyclorphan, and butorphan (Scheme 1) is also a potential site for metabolism, conjugation, and excretion, resulting in low oral bioavailability and short duration of action.5 Although the phenolic OH group was historically thought to be a requirement for binding to opioid receptors serving as a putative H-bond donor to a complementary site on the protein.6 Schiller and coworkers7 reported that replacement of the Tyr residue in TIPP peptides with a Bcp or Dbcp residue resulted in a general increase in DOR binding affinity. We have reported the modification of the phenolic hydroxyl group of cyclorphan and butorphan, such as carbamate,8 oxazole,9 urea,9 and aminothiazole10 analogues, which maintain high binding affinity. In continuing these studies on the development of effective analgesics and/or treatment for opioid addiction, we focused our interests on the structural modification and pharmacological evaluation of analogs of cyclorphan and butorphan, especially in the development of new MOR selective ligands. Our interest in exploring 3-benzylamino derivatives is twofold: first, replacement of the phenolic hydroxyl group may confer metabolic stability; and second, the presence of the 3-amino moiety allows for introduction of a variety of functionalized benzyl groups, which may result in analogues with increased selectivity and affinity for MOR. Here we report the synthesis, binding affinity, and functional activity of 3-benzylamino-3-desoxy-morphinans and 3-benzylamino-3-desoxy-morphine analogues.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of 3-benzylamino-morphinan analogues
With a combination of affinity labeling experiments using S-activated dihydromorphine derivatives and molecular mechanics, Sagara et al.11 reported the binding site of the MOR, the hydrogen bonding interaction between the phenolic hydroxyl group of morphine and both the amino group of Lys303 at TM VI and the phenolic hydroxyl group of Tyr148 at TM III. Relatively small ligands, such as morphine, may be able to bind at several different positions in the binding pocket of the receptor. One of the docking models12 proposed that the phenolic hydroxyl group is placed close to the imidazole group of His297 at TM VI forming hydrogen bonding interaction. Based on these binding models, we speculated that replacement of the OH group with an amino or a substituted amino group would maintain partial hydrogen bonding. Introduction of the aryl group on nitrogen may thus have a π–π interaction with the phenyl group of Tyr148 or imidazole group of His297 which may enhance the binding and increase the selectivity at the MOR. Wentland et al.13 had reported the opioid receptor binding properties of a series of cyclazocine analogues where the 8-OH group of cyclazocine was replaced with amino groups. Several members of this new series had surprisingly high affinity for the MOR and KOR. The NH2 group appears to be an effective bioisosteric replacement for the prototypic 8-OH group in cyclazocine. The replacement of OH with NH2 in morphine decreased the binding affinity significantly, albeit with better selectivity at the MOR over the other receptors.14 In our previous report,15 we also found that replacement OH group of butorphan or cyclorphan (Scheme 1) with NH2 resulted in a much lower binding affinity. By incorporating different substituted benzyl groups, ligands with improved binding affinity and selectivity were synthesized. Morphine analogues (11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b, and 12c) with substituted benzyl groups were generally less active at MOR. Interestingly, 17, a 2-benzylamino-3-desoxymorphinan, was found to be a highly KOR-selective ligand. Further methylation of the 3-amino nitrogen of these morphinan ligands (i.e., 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 6b, and 6c) impaired their binding affinity, which confirmed that the N-H bond participated in hydrogen bonding between the ligand and the receptor.
Chemistry
The synthetic route towards 3-benzylaminomorphinans is described in Scheme 1. Levorphanol tartrate was converted to its free base and then demethylated to afford norlevorphanol.16 The latter was then alkylated either with (bromomethyl)cyclobutane or (bromomethyl)cyclopropane to yield butorphan and cyclorphan, respectively.16 The 3-hydroxy groups were triflated (1a, 1b, 1c) with N-phenyl bistriflimide in the presence of triethylamine, which could then be coupled in a Buchwald-Hartwig reaction17 to yield the 3-benzylamino-3-desoxymorphinan directly. For effective preparation of N-substituted-3-aminomorphinans, the triflates were converted to their 3-aminomorphinans (2a–c) with benzophenoneimine using catalytic Pd(OAc)2 and rac-BINAP as ligand, followed by hydrolysis and condensation with an aldehyde and reduction of the resultant imine with NaBH4. The resulting amines (3a–k) were methylated using paraformaldehyde/NaBH4/TFA.18 The methoxybenzylaminomorphinans (3a–c, 3f–h) were demethylated with BBr3 in anhydrous CH2Cl2 to yield hydroxybenzylaminomorphinan ligands (4a–c, 4d–f). For the synthesis of morphine analogues (Scheme 2), morphine was treated with 1 equivalent of PhNTf2 and Et3N in dichloromethane to selectively afford morphine-3-triflate 7.21 The 6-hydroxy group was protected by TBDPSCl/Et3N to afford 8.14 The triflate was converted to 3-aminomorphine (9) by using Pd catalyzed amination with benzophenoneimine, followed by hydrolysis under acidic conditions. The resulting amine (9) was condensed with the appropriate benzaldehyde to afford the corresponding imine, and reduced with NaBH4 to give 3-benzylaminomorphine derivatives. TBDPS was routinely removed with TBAF to yield the desired ligands (11a–c), which after O-demethylation, gave 12a–c. For the preparation of 2-amino-3-desoxy-morphinan (16), cyclorphan was first nitrated with HNO3/HCOOH to afford 13,9 and then triflated to yield 2-nitromorphinan-3-triflate (14). The triflate was reduced to 2-nitro-3-desoxymorphinan (15) using Pd(OAc)2/dppp/Et3SiH.20 Finally, the nitro group was reduced to the amine (16), and converted to the corresponding imine with m-anisaldehyde and reduced with NaBH4 to give the 2-benzylamino-3-desoxymorphinan (17) (Scheme 3).
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of 3-benzylamino-3-morphine analogues
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of 2-(3′-hydroxybenzyl)amino-3-cyclorphan
Results and discussion
Target compounds were screened for their affinity and selectivity for MOR, KOR, and DOR with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell membranes stably expressing the human opioid receptors. The data are summarized in Table 1. For comparison purposes, opioid binding affinity data for levorphanol, butorphan, cyclorphan, compound 8a and 8d,15 morphine, and hydrocodone were also included.
Table 1.
Ki Values for the inhibition of MOR, KOR, and DOR Opioid Binding to CHO Membranesa
| Compound | ![]() |
Kia (nM) | Selectivity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [3H]DAMGO | [3H]U69,593 | [3H]Naltrindole | MOR/KOR/DOR | |||
| R1 | R2 | MOR | KOR | DOR | ||
| Levorphanol | CH3 | OH | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 4.2 ± 2.3 | 1/11/20 |
| Butorphan | ![]() |
OH | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.079 ± 0.003 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 3/1/75 |
| Cyclorphan | ![]() |
OH | 0.062 ±0.003 | 0.034 ± 0.002 | 1.9 ± 0.072 | 2/1/56 |
| 2a MCL-181a | CH3 | NH2 | 7.9 ± 1.0 | 110 ± 11 | 1500 ± 770 | 1/14/190 |
| 2b MCL-182a | ![]() |
NH2 | 3.7 ± 0.26 | 1.8 ± 0.06 | 180 ± 85 | 2/1/100 |
| 2c MCL-149 | ![]() |
NH2 | 1.30 ± 0.029 | 0.18 ± 0.003 | 150 ± 2 | 7/1/830 |
| 8a MCL-610b | ![]() |
0.26 ± 0.012 | 0.34 ± 0.031 | 29 ± 4.4 | 1/1/112 | |
| 8d MCL-630b | ![]() |
1.7 ± 0.053 | 2.8 ± 0.33 | 130 ± 11 | 1/2/76 | |
| 3a MCL-667 | ![]() |
![]() |
2.7 ± 0.07 | 2.2 ± 0.37 | 61 ± 0.41 | 1/1/28 |
| 3b MCL-665 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.69 ± 0.034 | 3.5 ± 0.45 | 150 ± 15 | 1/5/220 |
| 3c MCL-662 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.86 ± 0.057 | 4.5 ± 0.29 | 260 ± 29 | 1/5/300 |
| 3d MCL-668 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.7 ± 0.23 | 4.5 ± 0.46 | 100 ± 11 | 1/3/59 |
| 3e MCL-705 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.34 ± 0.018 | 1.1 ± 0.11 | 53 ± 3.7 | 1/3/160 |
| 3f MCL-699 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.2 ±0.09 | 1.3 ± 0.096 | 160 ± 37 | 1/1/130 |
| 3g MCL-700 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.51 ± 0.039 | 1.5 ± 0.16 | 110 ± 20 | 1/3/220 |
| 3h MCL-628 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.31 ± 0.010 | 0.51 ± 0.031 | 20 ± 2.1 | 1/2/65 |
| 3i MCL-702 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.17 ± 0.013 | 0.53 ± 0.044 | 20 ± 3.7 | 1/3/120 |
| 3k MCL-731 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.43 ± 0.046 | 1.1 ± 0.13 | 150 ± 8.5 | 1/3/350 |
| 4a MCL-682 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.7 ± 0.41 | 1.7 ± 0.063 | 110 ± 32 | 1/1/65 |
| 4b MCL-683 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.32 ± 0.016 | 1.9 ± 0.088 | 230 ± 18 | 1/6/720 |
| 4c MCL-706 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.35 ± 0.030 | 2.3 ± 0.34 | 120 ± 7.8 | 1/7/340 |
| 4d MCL-713 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.9 ± 0.24 | 0.26 ± 0.013 | 30 ± 3.3 | 10/1/150 |
| 4e MCL-701 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.16 ± 0.033 | 0.36 ± 0.025 | 41 ± 4.4 | 1/2/260 |
| 4f MCL-703 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.28 ± 0.041 | 0.27 ± 0.014 | 13 ± 2.0 | 1/1/44 |
| 4g MCL-725 | CH3 | ![]() |
0.42 ± 0.0083 | 10 ± 0.16 | 720 ± 64 | 1/24/1700 |
| 5a MCL-681 | ![]() |
![]() |
14 ± 1.2 | 19 ± 2.4 | 190 ± 18 | 1/1/14 |
| 5b MCL-666 | ![]() |
![]() |
13 ± 0.92 | 25 ± 2.1 | 350 ± 22 | 1/2/27 |
| 5c MCL-663 | ![]() |
![]() |
9.5 ± 0.56 | 8.5 ± 0.84 | 290 ± 16 | 1/1/34 |
| 5d MCL-680 | ![]() |
![]() |
26 ± 1.7 | 27 ± 3.5 | 730 ± 106 | 1/1/28 |
| 6b MCL-684 | ![]() |
![]() |
17 ± 0.74 | 23 ± 0.83 | 170 ± 3.8 | 1/1/10 |
| 6c MCL-664 | ![]() |
![]() |
3.2 ± 0.23 | 4.1 ± 0.52 | 530 ± 83 | 1/1/170 |
| 17 MCL-712c | ![]() |
![]() |
150 ± 16 | 0.99 ± 0.045 | 46 ± 0.31 inh | 150/1/>10000 |
As described in Table 1, we began by investigating butorphan and its derivatives. Butorphan has high affinity to the MOR (0.23 nM), although it is not selective. Addition of a benzyl group to the 3-amino moiety in compound 2b19 to yield 8d15 (see table 1 for structures) improved the affinity and selectivity to the MOR. We next investigated the effect of incorporation of different functional groups on the benzyl ring. Introduction of the methoxy group (3a–c and 3f–h) had a pronounced effect on affinity and selectivity in this series. Thus, while an o-methoxybenzyl derivative 3a had lower affinity and selectivity for MOR compared to butorphan, the m-methoxy analog 3b restored MOR binding affinity to a subnanomolar level, along with improved selectivity against the DOR. The p-methoxy analog 3c retained subnanomolar affinity to the MOR with even better selectivity vs. the DOR. In contrast, the p-chlorobenzyl analog 3d had no effect on selectivity and exhibited weaker affinity to the MOR. Next, we investigated the presence of a free phenolic group on the benzyl moiety. Much to our surprise, the o-hydroxybenzyl analog 4a (Ki = 1.7 nM) possessed MOR binding affinity an order of magnitude lower than butorphan (Ki = 0.23 nM). The m- and p-hydroxybenzyl analogs 4b and 4c, on the other hand, had similar binding and selectivity profiles as their methoxybenzyl derivatives (3b and 3c), as did the methylenedioxybenzyl derivative 3e and m-nitrobenzyl derivative 3k. The tertiary 3-amino analogs showed a marked loss in affinity and selectivity to the MOR, revealing that the 3-amino group as in 5a–c and 6b,c cannot be fully substituted.
Replacement of the 3-phenolic group in cyclorphan (Ki at MOR = 0.062 nM) for a 3-amino group (2c, Ki at MOR = 1.30 nM) resulted in a steep loss in affinity to the MOR. However, introduction of a benzylic group to the nitrogen as in 8b15 (Ki at MOR = 0.26 nM) resulted in high affinity to the MOR. In agreement with the methoxybenzylamino butorphan series (3a–c), methoxybenzylamino cyclorphan derivatives (3f–h) also possessed subnanomolar affinity to MOR and similar selectivities against DOR. The o-hydroxybenzylamino derivatives 4a and 4d exhibited much lower affinity to MOR. The m- and p- analogs 4e and 4f, however, had similar affinities and selectivities as the butorphan derivatives 4b and 4c. The methylenedioxy analog 3e followed the same trend. The examination of 2-(m-hydroxybenzylamino)-3-desoxycyclorphan 17 resulted in a loss of affinity to MOR, although it had high affinity and selectivity to the KOR. Since the hydroxybenzylamino moiety was shown to enhance affinity and selectivity to the MOR for cyclorphan and butorphan, we also examined the analogous derivative of levorphanol. Thus, 4g was found to possess subnanomolar affinity to MOR (Ki = 0.42 nM), moderate affinity against KOR, and almost 2000-fold lower affinity at DOR.
Because the methoxy- and hydroxybenzylamino substituted morphinan derivatives were found to have high affinity and selectivity to MOR, the corresponding derivatives of morphine were also examined. In contrast to the morphinan derivatives described above, which generally had MOR affinities in the subnanomolar range and improved selectivities to the MOR, the analogous morphine derivatives 11 and 12 suffered a loss of affinity to the MOR. The morphine analogs 12a–c showed only moderate binding affinity at MOR (Ki = 8.5, 13, 7.4 nM, respectively) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Ki Values for the inhibition of MOR, KOR, and DOR Opioid Binding to CHO Membranes
| Compound | Structure
|
Kia (nM) | Selectivity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | [3H]DAMGO | [3H]U69,593 | [3H]Naltrindole | MOR/KOR/DOR | ||
| MOR | KOR | DOR | ||||
| Morphine | OH | 0.88 ±0.14 | 24 ± 2.3 | 140 ± 18 | 1/27/156 | |
| Hydrocodone | OCH3 | 9.5 ± 0.73 | 260 ± 9.7 | 37% inh at 10μM ± 3.7 | 1/27/>1100 | |
| 11a MCL-720 | ![]() |
8.5 ± 0.79 | 220 ± 17 | 22% inh at 10μM ± 0.96 | 1/16/>1200 | |
| 11b MCL-718 | ![]() |
45 ± 2.2 | 500 ± 29 | 33% inh at 10μM ± 2.1 | 1/11/>220 | |
| 11c MCL-719 | ![]() |
60 ± 0.90 | 54% inh in 10μM 0.82 | 12% inh at 10μM ± 0.47 | 1/>160/>160 | |
| 12a MCL-721 | ![]() |
13 ± 0.53 | 370 ± 38 | 27% inh at 10μM ± 1.5 | 1/28/>770 | |
| 12b MCL-717 | ![]() |
7.0 ± 0.29 | 910 ± 30 | 31% inh at 10μM ± 2.8 | 1/130/>1400 | |
| 12c MCL-722 | ![]() |
44 ± 2.0 | 560 ± 8.8 | 19% inh at 10μM ± 1.0 | 1/13/230 | |
Membranes from Chinese hamster ovary cells, expressing either the human MOR, KOR, or DOR, were incubated with 12 different concentrations of the compounds in the presence of receptor-specific radioligands at 25 °C, in a final volume of 1 mL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. Nonspecific binding was determined using 10 μM naloxone. Data are the mean values ± SEM from three experiments, performed in triplicate.
Compounds which exhibited high affinity for the MOR were screened for functional activity at MOR (Table 3) and KOR (Table 4) using the [35S]GTPγS binding assay. Compound 4g, which contained an N-methyl group was a full agonist at the MOR as shown in Table 3. The 3-benzylaminomorphinans were partial agonists at the MOR. The 3-aminomorphine derivatives (11a, 12b) were full agonists at the MOR, but they were not very potent. While the 3-benzylaminomorphinans were partial agonists at the MOR, they were full agonists at the KOR as shown in Table 4. None of the compounds inhibited U50,488-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding mediated by the KOR.
Table 3.
Effect of High Affinity Compounds on [35S]GTPγS Binding Mediated by the Mu Opioid Receptora
| Compound | EC50 (nM) | Emax (% maximal stimulation over basal) | IC50 (nM) | Imax (% maximal inhibition) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAMGO | 55 ± 5.0 | 130 ± 6.1 | NIb | NI |
| Butorphan | 1.6 ± 0.15 | 50 ± 2.5 | 20 ± 2.7 | 50 ± 2.6 |
| Cyclorphan | 0.80 ± 0.40 | 40 ±2.9 | 1.7 ± 0.40 | 50 ± 1.2 |
| 3b | 3.8 ± 0.37 | 39 ± 4.4 | 80 ± 16 | 66 ± 4.3 |
| 3c | 7.8 ± 0.29 | 34 ± 2.9 | 150 ± 20 | 55 ± 3.0 |
| 3e | 3.6 ± 0.65 | 39 ± 3.7 | 94 ± 17 | 60 ± 0.84 |
| 3g | NA | 23 ± 3.1 | 2.0 ± 0.93 | 77 ± 2.9 |
| 3h | 6.8 ± 0.53 | 30 ± 1.2 | 10 ± 2.2 | 67 ± 2.1 |
| 3i | NA | 18 ± 2.4 | 0.21 ± 0.065 | 72 ± 2.8 |
| 3k | 1.1 ± 0.22 | 70 ± 8.1 | 6.8 ± 1.6 | 49 ± 4.7 |
| 4a | 38 ± 5.6 | 49 ± 4.6 | 810 ± 9.4 | 32 ± 4.6 |
| 4b | NA | 30 ± 3.7 | 4.8 ± 0.48 | 74 ± 2.7 |
| 4c | 3.6 ± 0.93 | 38 ± 4.7 | 75 ± 13 | 56 ± 6.6 |
| 4d | 8.8 ± 1.2 | 44 ± 2.0 | 160 ± 5.7 | 47 ± 1.3 |
| 4e | NA | 27 ± 0 | 3.5 ± 0.14 | 79 ± 8.4 |
| 4f | NA | 19 ± 1.0 | 7.6 ± 3.5 | 80 ± 1.2 |
| 4g | 6.5 ± 1.5 | 85 ± 6.1 | NI | NI |
| 11a | 210 ± 97 | 81 ± 13 | NI | NI |
| 12b | 550 ± 53 | 110 ± 16 | NI | NI |
Membranes from CHO cells that expressed the human μ opioid receptor were incubated with 12 concentrations of the compound in the presence of 0.08 nM [35S]GTPγS for 60 min at 30°C. Nonspecific binding was measured by the inclusion of 10 μM GTPγS. For the inhibition experiments, [35S]GTPγS binding was stimulated by the addition of 200 nM DAMGO. Data are the mean ± SEM from three experiments performed in triplicate.
NI = no inhibition of DAMGO-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding.
Table 4.
Effect of High Affinity Compounds on [35S]GTPγS Binding Mediated by the Kappa Opioid Receptora
| Compound | EC50 (nM) | Emax (% maximal stimulation over basal) |
|---|---|---|
| U50,488b | 4.2 ± 0.38 | 140 ± 10 |
| Butorphanb | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 80 ± 6.8 |
| Cyclorphanb | 0.19 ± 0.4 | 90 ± 10 |
| 3b | 39 ± 8.4 | 120 ± 13 |
| 3c | 50 ± 2.6 | 120 ± 7.1 |
| 3e | 27 ± 2.9 | 130 ± 12 |
| 3g | 0.43 ± 0.18 | 130 ± 14 |
| 3h | 5.3 ± 0.56 | 130 ± 3.3 |
| 3i | 0.077 ± 0.014 | 120 ± 4.3 |
| 3k | 0.79 ± 0.11 | 140 ± 16 |
| 4a | 47 ± 1.8 | 130 ± 7.1 |
| 4c | 38 ± 3.8 | 130 ± 4.8 |
| 4d | 2.3 ± 0.28 | 110 ± 4.9 |
| 4e | 3.9 ± 0.53 | 98 ± 1.9 |
| 4f | 1.8 ± 0.32 | 100 ± 2.7 |
| 4g | 230 ± 19 | 140 ± 9.0 |
| 17 | 27 ± 2.5 | 160 ± 6.4 |
Membranes from CHO cells that expressed the human κ opioid receptor were incubated with 12 concentrations of the compound in the presence of 0.08 nM [35S]GTPγS for 60 min at 30°C. Nonspecific binding was measured by the inclusion of 10 μM GTPγS. Data are the mean ± SEM from three experiments performed in triplicate. None of the compounds produced any inhibition of [35S]GTPγS binding stimulated by 100 nM U50,488.
See ref. 16.
Conclusion
We have extended the SARs of cyclorphan and butorphan analogues by introducing different substituted benzylamino groups at the 3-position of morphinan. Replacing the N-methyl substituent on the morphinan with cyclopropylmethyl or cyclobutylmethyl substituents generally increased the binding affinity at both the MOR and KOR. It was found that benzyl substituents at the 3-amino nitrogen tended to increase the binding affinity and selectivity of the compounds. Further alkylation of 3′-nitrogen reduced the MOR affinity significantly, which suggested that either hydrogen bonding was required or the larger methyl group inhibited binding between the 3-amino group of the compound and the MOR. In general, methoxy-, hydroxyl-, and methylenedioxy-substituted benzylaminomorphinans exhibited the highest bindng affinities to MOR. However, introduction of a free phenolic hydroxyl group may open a potential site for metabolism. The increased selectivity of morphine analogues supported the hypothesis that a methoxybenzylamino or hydroxybenzylamino group at the 3-position of an opioid ligand may interact with another site of the MOR, and may be a useful consideration when designing new MOR selective opioid ligands. Functional activity was determined for analogs which exhibited high binding affinity to the MOR and KOR, and it was found that all morphinan derivatives were partial agonists at the MOR and morphine derivatives were full agonists at the MOR although with low potency. All compounds proved to be full agonists at the KOR. Our efforts led to the discovery of potent, selective MOR agonists and also led to further insights into their structure-activity relationship. Compounds 4a and 4g are promising lead compounds for further evaluation and optimization, and they may be used as chemical and pharmacological tools to elucidate the pharmacodynamic features of opioid receptors. This class of compounds, mixed kappa/mu opioids, may have utility in the treatment of cocaine abuse, and, with further pharmacological evaluation, may also prove to be useful as analgesics. Notably, 17, which has the benzylamino group attached to position 2 rather than the position 3, was found to be highly selective at the KOR and emerged as a promising lead compound for further design and modification for the development of KOR selective opioid ligands.
Experimental Section
General Synthetic Methods
1H (and 13C NMR) spectra were recorded at 300 MHz (75 MHz) on a Varian Mercury 300 spectrometer. Chemical shifts are given as δ value (ppm) downfield from tetramethylsilane as an internal reference. Melting points were determined on a Thomas-Hoover capillary tube apparatus and are reported uncorrected. Elemental analyses, performed by Atlantic Microlabs, Atlanta, GA, were within 0.4% of theoretical values. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on 0.2 micrometer Kieselgel 60F-254 silica gel aluminum sheets (EM Science, Newark, NJ). Flash chromatography was used for the routine purification of reaction products. Eluent systems are described for the individual compounds.
Representative Procedure for the Preparation of morphinans 3a–k, 10a–c
To a solution of N-cyclobutylmethyl-3-aminomorphinan 2a (113 mg, 0.364 mmol) and p-anisaldehyde (59 mg, 0.437 mmol) in anhydrous methanol (10 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere was added sodium sulfate (200 g, 1.4 mmol) and allowed to stir overnight at RT. Next, sodium borohydride (59 mg, 1.54 mmol) was added and stirred at RT for 4 hours. After the reaction was judged complete, the mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was dissolved ethyl acetate (50 mL) and washed sequentially with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate, then filtered and concentrated, and the residue was purified over silica gel using EtOAc/Et3N 200:1 to afford 97 mg of N-cyclobutylmethyl-3-(4-methoxybenzyl)aminomorphinan 3c as a pale yellow oil, 62% yield. The oil was dissolved in a minimal amount of ethyl acetate and treated with excess 1N ethereal HCl. The resulting solution was then concentrated and the residue was recrystallized from methanol/diethyl ether to afford the corresponding dihydrochloride salt (mp = 180–183°C).
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3a)
Pale yellow oil (339 mg, 98%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33 – 7.19 (m, 2H), 6.89 (dd, J = 5.8, 11.5, 3H), 6.56 (d, J = 2.0, 1H), 6.49 (dd, J = 1.8, 8.1, 1H), 4.29 (s, 2H), 4.02 (s, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 2.99 – 2.78 (m, 2H), 2.73 – 2.44 (m, J = 19.4, 5H), 2.31 – 1.08 (m, 18H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.4, 146.9, 140.6, 129.2, 128.2, 128.2, 127.4, 125.8, 120.4, 111.3, 110.2, 109.8, 61.0, 56.2, 55.2, 46.1, 44.4, 43.7, 41.2, 37.3, 36.4, 34.2, 27.8, 27.8, 26.7, 26.4, 24.0, 22.1, 18.7; m.p.: 156–158 °C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C29H38N2O•2HCl•0.8H2O: C, 67.25; H, 8.10; N, 5.41. Found: C, 67.37, H, 8.15; N, 5.31.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-(3-methoxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3b)
Colorless oil (195 mg, 71%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.25 (td, J = 2.0, 8.2, 1H), 7.02 – 6.86 (m, 3H), 6.80 (dd, J = 1.7, 8.2, 1H), 6.53 (d, J = 2.2, 1H), 6.46 (dd, J = 2.4, 8.1, 1H), 4.26 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.90 (d, J = 17.8, 1H), 2.78 (m, 1H), 2.60 – 2.37 (m, 5H), 2.23 (d, J = 10.8, 1H), 2.15 – 1.97 (m, 3H), 1.94 – 1.13 (m, 14H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.8, 146.6, 141.3, 141.0, 129.5, 128.3, 126.5, 119.9, 113.1, 112.6, 110.8, 109.7, 61.2, 56.1, 55.1, 48.8, 46.0, 44.8, 41.6, 37.4, 36.5, 34.5, 27.8, 26.8, 26.5, 23.9, 22.1, 18.8; (HCl salt) m.p.: 151–154°C; Anal. Calcd for C29H38N2O•2HCl•0.8H2O: C, 67.25; H, 8.10; N, 5.41. Found: C, 67.19, H, 8.00; N, 5.47.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-(4-methoxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3c)
Pale yellow oil (276 mg, 85%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.34 – 7.26 (m, 2H), 6.94 – 6.84 (m, 3H), 6.52 (d, J = 2.4, 1H), 6.46 (dd, J = 2.4, 8.1, 1H), 4.20 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.90 (d, J = 18.0, 1H), 2.78 (dd, J = 3.0, 5.3, 1H), 2.59 – 2.37 (m, 6H), 2.24 (d, J = 10.7, 1H), 2.13 –1.16 (m, 17H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.7, 146.6, 141.2, 131.6, 128.9, 128.2, 127.0, 113.9, 110.7, 109.7, 61.4, 56.0, 55.2, 48.2, 46.0, 45.2, 41.9, 37.5, 36.6, 34.9, 27.89, 27.87, 26.9, 26.6, 23.9, 22.2, 18.8; mp: 180–183°C (for HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C29H38N2O•2HCl•1.3H2O: C, 66.10; H, 8.15; N, 5.32. Found: C, 66.50, H, 8.13; N, 5.05.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-(4-chlorobenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3d)
Pale yellow oil (99 mg, 71%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30 (m, 4H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 6.49 (s, 1H), 6.44 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 4.27 (s, 2H), 3.89 (s, 1H), 2.90 (d, J = 18.0, 1H), 2.77 (s, 1H), 2.60 – 2.36 (m, 5H), 2.20 (d, J = 11.6, 1H), 2.06 (t, J = 10.6, 3H), 1.93 – 1.07 (m, 14H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 147.0, 139.5, 137.8, 132.8, 128.69, 128.65, 128.6, 123.5, 11.5, 109.5, 59.6, 56.7, 47.8, 46.4, 42.0, 39.3, 36.6, 35.6, 32.1, 27.85, 27.76, 26.2, 25.8, 24.1, 21.7, 18.6; m.p.: 160–163°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H35N2Cl•2HCl•0.4H2O: C, 65.28; H, 7.40; N, 5.44. Found: C, 65.28, H, 7.46; N, 5.39.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-(3,4-methylenedioxybenzyl)morphinan-3-amine (3e)
Yellow oil (42 mg, 51%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.84 (m, J = 8.0, 17.0, 29.7, 4H), 6.51 (d, J = 2.2, 1H), 6.45 (dd, J = 2.3, 8.1, 1H), 5.93 (s, 2H), 4.19 (s, 2H), 2.86 (m, 2H), 2.48 (m, 5H), 1.87 (m, 10H), 1.25 (m, 8H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 147.8, 146.6, 146.4, 141.2, 133.5, 128.3, 127.0, 120.8, 110.7, 109.8, 108.20, 108.19, 100.9, 61.3, 55.9, 48.6, 45.9, 45.1, 41.8, 37.5, 36.6, 34.8, 27.9, 26.8, 26.6, 23.9, 22.2, 18.8; m.p.: 165–168°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C29H36N2O2•2HCl•0.4H2O: C, 65.04; H, 7.53; N, 5.23. Found: C, 64.91, H, 7.33; N, 5.12.
(−)-17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3f)
Pale yellow oil (118 mg, 84%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.31 (d, J = 7.2, 1H), 7.23 (t, J = 7.5, 1H), 6.89 (t, J = 9.4, 3H), 6.57 (s, 1H), 6.47 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 4.29 (s, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.07 (s, 1H), 2.83 (d, J = 18.0, 1H), 2.70 (d, J = 9.2, 1H), 2.52-2.48 (m, 2H), 2.31 (m, 2H), 2.05 (m, 1H), 1.81-1.60 (m, 3H), 1.34-1.13 (m, 8H), 0.87 (m, 1H), 0.49 (d, J = 7.6, 2H), 0.11 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 157.3, 146.8, 141.0, 129.2, 128.2, 128.1, 127.5, 126.6, 120.4, 111.1, 110.2, 109.9, 59.8, 55.7, 55.2, 45.8, 45.2, 43.7, 41.8, 37.6, 36.6, 26.8, 26.6, 23.7, 22.2, 9.3, 4.0, 3.6; m.p.: 151–153°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H36N2O•2HCl•1.6H2O: C, 64.88; H, 8.01; N, 5.40. Found: C, 65.15, H, 7.79; N, 5.14.
(−)-17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-N-(3-methoxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3g)
Pale yellow oil (130 mg, 93%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.24 (t, J = 6.8, 1H), 6.92 (dd, J = 8.9, 19.9, 3H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 6.46 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 4.26 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.12 (s, 1H), 2.84 (d, J = 18.1, 1H), 2.75 (d, J = 11.5, 1H), 2.55-2.47 (m, 2H), 2.36 (dd, J = 6.8, 12.2, 1H), 2.25 (d, J = 11.1, 1H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.83-1.63 (m, 2H), 1.62 (d, J = 9.7, 1H), 1.29-1.12 (m, 8H), 0.90 (m, 1H), 0.51 (d, J = 7.8, 2H), 0.12 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 159.7, 146.6, 141.2, 141.0, 129.5, 128.2, 126.5, 119.8, 113.0, 112.5, 110.7, 109.6, 59.6, 55.8, 55.1, 48.7, 45.8, 44.8, 41.6, 37.5, 36.5, 26.7, 26.5, 23.7, 22.1, 9.0, 4.0, 3.6; m.p.: 158–160°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H36N2O•2HCl•1.2H2O: C, 65.79; H, 7.97; N, 5.48. Found: C, 65.87, H, 7.88; N, 5.50.
(−)-17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-N-(4-methoxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3h)
Pale yellow oil (116 mg, 83%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.29 (d, J = 7.1, 2H), 6.88 (m, 3H), 6.53 (s, 1H), 6.46 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 4.20 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.14 (s, 1H), 2.81 (t, J = 17.6, 2H), 2.57 (m, 2H), 2.40 (d, J = 6.0, 1H), 2.25 (d, J = 11.1, 1H), 2.05 (m, 1H), 1.84 (m, 2H), 1.60-1.12 (m, 9H), 0.90 (m, 1H), 0.51 (d, J = 6.9, 2H), 0.13 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 158.7, 146.7, 140.9, 131.5, 128.9, 128.2, 126.3, 113.9, 110.8, 109.6, 59.6, 55.8, 55.2, 48.2, 45.8, 44.7, 41.5, 37.5, 36.5, 26.8, 26.5, 23.8, 22.2, 8.9, 4.0, 3.7; m.p.: 162–164°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H36N2O•2HCl•H2O: C, 66.26; H, 7.94; N, 5.52. Found: C, 66.06, H, 7.63; N, 5.52.
(−)-17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-N-(3,4-methylenedihydroxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3i)
Pale yellow oil (47 mg, 67%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.87-6.75 (m, 3H), 6.53 (d, J = 2.2, 1H), 6.45 (dd, J = 2.3, 8.1, 1H), 5.94 (s, 2H), 4.19 (s, 2H), 3.11 (s, 1H), 2.84 (d, J = 18.2, 1H), 2.74 (d, J = 9.3, 1H), 2.54 (m, 2H), 2.35 (dd, J = 6.6, 12.6, 1H), 2.25 (d, J = 11.4, 1H), 2.07 (m, 1H), 1.78 (m, 2H), 1.62 (d, J = 10.5, 1H), 1.34-1.12 (m, 9H), 0.88 (m, 1H), 0.50 (d, J = 6.8, 2H), 0.12 (d, J = 4.4, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 147.8, 146.6, 146.5, 141.2, 133.5, 128.3, 126.7, 120.8, 110.8, 109.8, 108.2, 100.9, 59.8, 55.8, 48.6, 45.9, 45.0, 41.7, 37.6, 36.6, 26.8, 26.6, 23.8, 22.2, 9.2, 4.1, 3.7; m.p.: 166–170°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H34N2O2•2HCl•1.4H2O: C, 63.61; H, 7.40; N, 5.30. Found: C, 63.29, H, 7.13; N, 5.25.
(−)-17-methyl-N-(3′-methoxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (3j)
White solid (HCl salt; 110 mg, 44%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.24 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.07 – 6.72 (m, 4H), 6.60 – 6.37 (m, 2H), 4.27 (s, 2H), 3.98 – 3.61 (m, 4H), 2.94 (d, J = 18.1 Hz, 1H), 2.78 (s, 1H), 2.65 – 2.07 (m, 8H), 1.85 – 1.14 (m, 12H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.76, 146.53, 141.29, 141.02, 129.48, 128.28, 126.87, 119.86, 113.06, 112.58, 110.74, 109.72, 58.01, 55.11, 48.76, 47.33, 45.57, 42.75, 42.10, 37.04, 36.66, 26.74, 26.56, 23.22, 22.18.; m.p.: 146–149°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C25H32N2O•2HCl•4H2O: C, 57.58; H, 8.12; N, 5.37. Found: C, 57.93, H, 7.98; N, 4.87.
(−)-3-(3′-nitrobenzyl)amino-17-cyclobutylmethylmorphinan (3k)
Pale yellow oil (215 mg, 71%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.21 (s, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 8.5, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 6.51 (s, 1H), 6.45 (d J = 8.5, 1H), 4.40 (s, 2H), 4.18 – 4.10 (m, 1H), 2.90 (d, J = 18.1, 1H), 2.80 – 2.71 (m, 1H), 2.60 – 2.37 (m, 5H), 2.10 – 1.97 (m, 4H), 1.94 – 1.13 (m, 14H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 148.5, 145.7, 142.3, 141.5, 133.4, 129.4, 128.4, 127.8, 122.2, 122.1, 110.8, 109.9, 6q.5, 55.9, 48.0, 45.9, 45.2, 41.9, 37.6, 36.6, 34.9, 27.9, 27.8, 26.8, 26.8, 23.9, 22.1, 18.8; m.p.: 145–148°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H35N3O2•2HCl: C, 64.86; H, 7.19; N, 8.10. Found: C, 65.14, H, 7.28; N, 8.04.
Representative Procedure for the Preparation of morphinans 4a–f, 6b,c
To a solution of N-cyclobutylmethyl-3-(4-methoxybenzyl)aminomorphinan 3c (149 mg, 0.347 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (3 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere at 0°C was added slowly dropwise a solution of BBr3 (3 mL, 1M in anhydrous dichloromethane). After addition was complete, the resulting solution was allowed to warm to RT and stirred for 1.5 hours. Next, the solution was diluted with excess diethyl ether and allowed to precipitate at 0°C. The residue was washed with ethyl acetate, then dissolved in 3M aqueous HCl (10 mL) and washed with ethyl acetate (10 mL). The aqueous layer was basified with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, and extracted with dichloromethane (2×20 mL). The combined dichloromethane extracts were dried over sodium sulfate, then filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified over silica gel using EtOAc/Et3N (100:1) as eluent to afford 90 mg of N-cyclobutylmethyl-3-(4-hydroxybenzyl)aminomorphinan 4c as a pale yellow oil, 74% yield. The oil was then dissolved in a minimal amount of EtOAc and treated with excess 1N ethereal HCl and then concentrated to afford a white solid. The solid was washed with a small amount of EtOAc and ether and dried under reduced pressure to afford 94 mg of the dihydrochloride salt (mp = 165–168°C).
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-(2-hydroxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (4a)
Pale yellow oil, 23mg (82%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.13 (dd, J = 14.2, 21.8, 1H), 6.83 – 6.62 (m, 4H), 6.48 – 6.26 (m, 2H), 4.19 (s, 2H), 3.90 (s, 1H), 2.99 – 2.66 (m, 2H), 2.66 – 2.40 (m, 4H), 2.39 – 2.22 (m, 1H), 2.18 – 0.90 (m, 18H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.1, 147.4, 138.5, 128.7, 128.6, 128.6, 123.7, 123.1, 119.5, 116.1, 113.5, 111.1, 58.7, 57.0, 46.5, 40.7, 38.2, 36.2, 35.0, 30.9, 27.7, 27.6, 25.8, 25.4, 21.5, 18.5; m.p.: 172–174°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H36N2O•2HCl•1.3H2O: C, 61.21; H, 7.63; N, 5.10. Found: C, 60.95; H, 7.35; N, 5.22.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-(3-hydroxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (4b)
Pale yellow foam; 34mg (96%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.92 (s, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 14.1, 21.8, 1H), 6.85 – 6.60 (m, 4H), 6.48 – 6.27 (m, 2H), 4.16 (s, 2H), 3.91 (s, 1H), 2.97 – 2.69 (m, 2H), 2.69 – 2.40 (m, 4H), 2.37 – 2.20 (m, 1H), 2.17 – 0.92 (m, 18H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.6, 146.9, 141.2, 140.3, 129.6, 128.3, 124.9, 118.2, 114.8, 114.5, 110.5, 109.6, 60.5, 55.9, 48.1, 46.1, 43.4, 40.5, 37.0, 36.1, 33.3, 28.2, 27.9, 26.6, 26.2, 23.7, 22.0, 18.7; m.p.: 177–180°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H36N2O•2HCl•0.9H2O: C, 62.03; H, 7.58; N, 5.17. Found: C, 62.10; H, 7.62; N, 5.08.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-(4-hydroxybenzyl)morphinan-3-amine (4c)
Pale yellow foam (90 mg, 74%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.22 (d, J = 8.3, 2H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 8.4, 2H), 6.50 (m, 2H), 4.19 (s, 2H), 2.90 (m, J = 13.7, 2H), 2.55 (m, 5H), 2.14 (m, 4H), 1.72 (m, 7H), 1.26 (m, 8H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 156.5, 146.9, 140.7, 129.9, 129.1, 128.3, 126.0, 115.9, 110.9, 109.6, 61.1, 55.9, 48.4, 46.0, 44.1, 41.1, 37.3, 36.4, 34.1, 28.1, 26.7, 26.4, 23.8, 22.1, 18.7; m.p.: 165–168°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C28H36N2O•2HCl•1.3H2O: C, 65.56; H, 7.98; N, 5.46. Found: C, 65.41, H, 7.73; N, 5.50.
(−)-17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-N-(2-hydroxybenzyl)morphinan-3-amine (4d)
Pale yellow foam (68 mg. 90%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.18 (dd, J = 7.4, 14.6, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 6.87 (dd, J = 2.9, 7.7, 2H), 6.71 (d, J = 2.1, 1H), 6.64 (dd, J = 2.2, 8.1, 1H), 4.39 (s, 2H), 3.19 (s, 1H), 2.87 (d, J = 18.3, 1H), 2.80 (m, 1H), 2.64 (dd, J = 6.6, 19.4, 1H), 2.55 (m, 1H), 2.40 (dd, J = 6.8, 12.5, 1H), 2.22 (d, J = 13.0, 1H), 2.11 (m, 1H), 1.94 (d, J = 12.6, 1H), 1.84 (td, J = 4.3, 12.7, 1H), 1.62 (d, J = 9.3, 1H), 1.19 (m, 8H), 0.52 (m, 2H), 0.16 (q, J = 4.8, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 156.8, 145.7, 141.1, 128.9, 128.6, 128.4, 123.4, 119.7, 116.4, 113.5, 112.6, 59.6, 55.8, 48.7, 45.8, 44.4, 41.2, 37.5, 36.4, 26.7, 26.4, 23.9, 22.0, 8.8, 4.1, 3.8; m.p.: 170–173°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C27H34N2O•2HCl•1.4H2O: C, 64.77; H, 7.81; N, 5.59. Found: C, 64.50, H, 7.67; N, 5.46.
(−)-17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-N-(3-hydroxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (4e)
Pale yellow oil (65 mg, 84%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.16 (t, J = 7.9, 1H), 6.81-6.72 (m, 4H), 6.48 (s, 1H), 6.40 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 4.26 (s, 2H), 3.97 (s, 1H), 3.17 (s, 1H), 2.79 (d, J = 18.3, 1H), 2.61 (m, 1H), 2.41 (m, 2H), 2.25 (m, 2H), 1.97 (m, 2H), 1.67-1.06 (m, 10H), 0.88 (m, 1H), 0.47 (d, J = 7.6, 2H), 0.08 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 157.7, 146.8, 141.4, 140.7, 129.6, 128.3, 125.6, 118.0, 114.8, 114.3, 109.8, 109.7, 59.3, 55.5, 47.9, 45.7, 44.0, 41.2, 37.3, 36.3, 26.7, 26.3, 23.5, 22.1, 8.2, 4.1, 4.0; m.p.: 171–175°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C27H34N2O•2HCl•1.1H2O: C, 65.47; H, 7.77; N, 5.66. Found: C, 65.61, H, 7.67; N, 5.27.
(−)-17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-N-(4-hydroxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (4f)
Pale yellow oil (69 mg, 79%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.82 (m, 4H), 6.68 (d, J = 8.0, 1H), 6.47 (s, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 4.14 (s, 2H), 3.28 (m, 2H), 2.72-2.42 (m, 5H), 2.12-0.91 (m, 14H), 0.53 (d, J = 7.6, 2H), 0.16 (d, J = 4.0, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 156.4, 146.9, 140.7, 130.0, 129.1, 128.3, 126.0, 115.9, 111.0, 109.7, 59.5, 55.8, 48.4, 45.8, 44.2, 41.1, 37.5, 36.4, 26.8, 26.4, 23.8, 22.1, 8.5,4.2, 3.8; m.p.: 195°C (dec.) (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C27H34N2O•2HCl•1.6H2O: C, 64.30; H, 7.83; N, 5.55. Found: C, 64.23, H, 7.83; N, 5.28.
(−)-N-methyl-(3′-hydroxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (4g)
Pale yellow foam (55 mg, 78%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.66 (s, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.91 – 6.67 (m, 4H), 6.49 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (s, 2H), 4.11 (s, 1H), 2.99 – 2.76 (m, 2H), 2.64 (dd, J = 18.4, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 2.26 – 1.09 (m, 13H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.2, 147.2, 141.7, 140.7, 130.0, 128.6, 125.4, 118.1, 115.0, 114.4, 110.2, 110.1, 58.5, 48.0, 47.3, 44.3, 42.2, 41.4, 36.9, 36.4, 26.8, 26.5, 23.6, 22.3; m.p.: 166–169°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C24H30N2O•2HCl•3H2O: C, 58.89; H, 7.83; N, 5.72. Found: C, 59.02, H, 7.93; N, 5.40.
Representative Procedure for the Preparation of morphinans 5a–d
To a solution of N-cyclobutylmethyl-3-(4-methoxybenzyl)aminomorphinan 3c (210 mg, 0.487 mmol), paraformaldehyde (141 mg, 4.87 mmol), and NaBH4 (93 mg, 2.44 mmol) in anhydrous THF (5 mL) was added TFA dropwise (2.5 mL). The solution was stirred for 3 days at room temperature, then poured into a mixture of excess aqueous NaOH and ice chips, and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×20 mL). The combined organic layer were dried over Na2SO4, then filtered and concentrated to afford 212 mg of N-cyclobutylmethyl-3-(4-methoxybenzyl)-3-methylaminomorphinan 5c as a pale yellow oil, 98% yield. The oil (64 mg) was converted to the dihydrochloride salt as described above to afford 70 mg of a white solid. (mp = 146–148°C).
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-methyl-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (5a)
Pale yellow oil (102 mg, 82%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.20 – 7.10 (m, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.2, 1H), 6.88 – 6.76 (m, 3H), 6.50 (dd, J = 3.0, 11.3, 2H), 4.46 – 4.31 (dd, J = 18, 24, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.93 (s, 3H), 2.84 (d, J = 17.8, 1H), 2.71 (s, 1H), 2.43 (m, 5H), 2.15 (d, J = 10.1, 1H), 2.07 – 1.93 (m, 3H), 1.84 – 1.49 (m, 7H), 1.35 – 1.12 (m, 7H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 157.6, 149.0, 140.1, 128.2, 127.9, 127.9, 126.9, 125.2, 120.3, 111.2, 110.2, 109.5, 61.3, 56.2, 54.7, 52.2, 46.3, 44.9, 41.5, 38.5, 37.6, 36.8, 34.7, 28.2, 28.0, 27.1, 26.8, 23.7, 22.4, 18.7; m.p.: 133–135°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C30H40N2O•2HCl•1.1H2O: C, 67.05; H, 8.29; N, 5.21. Found: C, 66.79, H, 8.30; N, 5.03.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-methyl-N-(4-methyloxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (5c)
Pale yellow oil (212 mg, 98%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.09 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 6.78 – 6.69 (m, 2H), 6.58 – 6.45 (m, J = 2.5, 8.2, 2H), 4.30 (s, 2H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.88 – 2.75 (m, 4H), 2.69 (dd, J = 3.0, 5.4, 1H), 2.53 – 2.27 (m, 5H), 2.21 – 2.08 (m, 1H), 2.05 –0.93 (m, 17H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.4, 148.5, 140.9, 131.3, 128.1, 128,1, 128.0, 126.2, 113.7, 113.7, 110.8, 109.7, 61.5, 56.8, 56.0, 55.2, 46.0, 45.3, 42.0, 38.5, 37.6, 36.7, 35.0, 27.9, 27.8, 26.8, 26.6, 23.8, 22.2, 18.8; mp: 146–148°C (for HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C30H40N2O•2HCl•H2O: C, 67.28; H, 8.28; N, 5.23. Found: C, 67.38, H, 8.23; N, 5.19.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-methyl-N-(4-chlorobenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (5d)
Pale yellow oil (61 mg, 92%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.23 – 7.14 (m, 2H), 7.13 – 7.07 (m, 2H), 6.91 – 6.83 (m, 1H), 6.54 – 6.46 (m, 2H), 4.33 (s, 2H), 2.88 (s, 3H), 2.84 (d, J = 17.8 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (m, 1H), 2.52 – 2.31 (m, 5H), 2.11 (d, J = 12.8, 1H), 1.99 (m, 3H), 1.86 – 1.48 (m, 13H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 148.7, 140.2, 138.7, 132.4, 128.7, 128.7, 128.5, 128.5, 128.4, 126.0, 111.8, 110.1, 61.3, 56.7, 56.1, 46.2, 44.9, 41.5, 38.7, 37.6, 36.8, 34.7, 28.2, 28.0, 27.0, 26.7, 23.7, 22.3, 18.6; m.p.: 135–139°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C29H37ClN2•2HCl•1.3H2O: C, 63.86; H, 7.69; N, 5.14. Found: C, 63.69, H, 7.70; N, 5.02.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-methyl-N-(2-hydroxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (6a)
Pale yellow foam 34 mg (95%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.15 – 7.06 (m, 1H), 7.02 – 6.94 (m, 2H), 6.92 – 6.83 (m, 2H), 6.82 – 6.70 (m, 2H), 4.25 (s, 2H), 2.91 (m, 2H), 2.79 – 2.46 (m, 5H), 2.73 (s, 3H), 2.26 – 0.88 (m, 18H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.0, 149.4, 140.4, 128.7, 128.4, 128.3, 122.2, 119.5, 116.6, 116.1, 115.6, 60.5, 59.4, 56.2, 46.0, 43.5, 40.8, 40.5, 37.2, 36.0, 33.5, 27.85, 27.81, 26.4, 26.1, 24.2, 21.8, 18.7; m.p.: 155–157°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C29H38N2O•2HCl•1.4H2O: C, 66.10; H, 8.15; N, 5.32. Found: C, 65.84, H, 7.89; N, 5.24.
(−)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)-N-methyl-N-(4-hydroxybenzyl)-morphinan-3-amine (6c)
Pale yellow oil (107 mg, 74%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.08 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 6.53 (dt, J = 2.5, 8.2, 2H), 4.30 (s, 2H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.88 – 2.76 (m, 4H), 2.69 (dd, J = 3.0, 5.3, 1H), 2.43 (m, 4H), 2.33 (dd, J = 3.1, 11.9, 1H), 2.15 (d, J = 11.9, 1H), 1.99 (m, 3H), 1.84 – 1.48 (m, 7H), 1.35 – 1.01 (m, 7H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.1, 148.7, 140.2, 129.5, 128.2, 128.2, 128.1, 124.8, 115.9, 115.9, 110.9, 109.7, 60.9, 56.8, 56.0, 46.1, 43.9, 40.9, 38.5, 37.3, 36.3, 33.9, 28.1, 28.0, 26.6, 26.3, 23.7, 22.0, 18.7; m.p.: 174–178°C (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C29H38N2O•2HCl•0.8H2O: C, 67.25; H, 8.10; N, 5.41. Found: C, 67.14, H, 8.13; N, 5.39.
Morphine-3-(trifluoromethanesulfonate) (7)21
Morphine-3-(trifluomethanesulfonate) (7) was prepared according to the literature procedure (4.415 g, 90% yield). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.89 (d, J = 8.4, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.4, 1H), 5.69 (d, J = 9.9, 1H), 5.29 (d, J = 9.7, 1H), 5.02 (d, J = 6.3, 1H), 4.22 (s, 1H), 3.40 (s, 1H), 3.28 (s, 1H), 3.10 (d, J = 19.1, 1H), 2.72 (s, 1H), 2.63 (dd, J = 4.5, 12.2, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.33 (m, J = 6.1, 19.0, 2H), 2.12 (td, J = 4.8, 12.5, 1H), 1.88 (d, J = 12.5, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 149.4, 135.6, 133.6, 133.4, 130.4, 128.2, (124.9, 120.6, 116.4, 112.1, q), 120.8, 120.1, 93.5, 66.4, 58.3, 45.9, 43.2, 42.8, 40.3, 35.1, 20.8
Morphine-6-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)oxy-3-(trifluoromethanesulfonate) (8)14
Morphine-3-(trifluomethanesulfonate) (7) (2.02 g, 4.85 mmol), TBDPSCl (1.60 g, 5.82 mmol), and imidazole (792 mg, 11. 6 mmol) were stirred overnight in dichloromethane. Next, ethyl acetate (100 mL) was added to the solution, and it was washed sequentially with water (50 mL) and brine (10 mL), and the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. The organic layer was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified on silica gel (EtOAc:Et3N 200:1) to the title product 8 as a give white foam (2.94 g, 93%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.82 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.53 – 7.31 (m, 6H), 6.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.56 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (dt, J = 9.7, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (dd, J = 5.2, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (dd, J = 5.9, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (d, J = 19.1 Hz, 1H), 2.52 – 2.21 (m, 4H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.85 – 1.63 (m, 2H), 1.12 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 150.8, 135.9, 135.7, 135.3, 133.6, 133.5, 133.3, 130.5, 129.86, 129.76, 128.1, 127.68, 127.66, 121.5, 120.9, 119.1, 116.6, 94.0, 69.2, 58.3, 45.9, 43.9, 43.0, 40.8, 35.4, 26.7, 21.0, 19.2
3-Amino-6-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)oxymorphine (9)
Under nitrogen atmosphere, morphine-6-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)oxy-3-(trifluoromethanesulfonate) (8) (2.93 g, 4.47 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous THF (50 mL), and Pd(OAc)2 (50 mg, 0.224 mmol), rac-BINAP (279 mg, 0.448 mmol), and benzophenone imine (1.05g, 5.81 mmol) were added to the stirring solution. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 24h under N2. After the reaction was complete, THF was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was taken up in dichloromethane (200 mL), washed with water, and dried over Na2SO4. The organic layer was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure, and the crude product (orange oil) was used for the next step directly. The residue was dissolved in MeOH (30 mL) and NaOAc (880 mg, 10.7 mmol) and hydroxylamine hydrochloride (560 mg, 8.04 mmol) were added, and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 days. After completion, the methanol was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (200 mL), washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, then filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified on silica gel (eluted by EtOAc and EtOAc/Et3N 100/1) to afford 9 as a white solid (1.77 g, 76%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.88 – 7.79 (m, 2H), 7.75 – 7.66 (m, 2H), 7.42 (m, 6H), 6.47 (dd, J = 22.1, 7.9 Hz, 2H), 5.76 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 5.27 – 5.16 (m, 1H), 4.40 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 4.28 – 4.19 (m, 1H), 3.46 (s, 2H), 3.26 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (d, J = 18.5 Hz, 1H), 2.57 – 2.18 (m, 4H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 1.73 (s, 2H), 1.14 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 147.3, 135.8, 135.7, 134.0, 133.7, 133.1, 129.7. 129.6, 128.2, 127.6, 124.9, 118.6, 115.9, 91.6, 69.1, 58.8, 46.4, 43.3, 43.0, 41.0, 35.6, 26.8, 20.4, 19.3
(−)-3-N-(3′-methoxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-6-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (10a)
Pale yellow oil (920 mg, 95%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.78 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.49 – 7.19 (m, 7H), 6.98 (m, 2H), 6.80 (dd, J = 8.1, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.49 – 6.34 (m, 2H), 5.75 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.23 – 5.13 (m, 1H), 4.36 (2, 2H), 4.38-4.36 (m, 1H), 4.24-4.17 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.27 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (d, J = 18.5 Hz, 1H), 2.56 – 2.16 (m, 4H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 1.74 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.08 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 159.8, 147.0, 141.6, 135.8, 135.7, 133.9, 133.7, 133.2, 130.7, 129.7, 129.5, 128.9, 128.1, 127.6, 127.5, 123.5, 119.8, 118.7, 112.8, 112.6, 111.7, 91.7, 69.1, 59.0, 55.1, 48.7, 46.4, 43.4, 43.0, 40.9, 35.6, 26.8, 20.4, 19.4
(−)-3-N-(2′-methoxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-6-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (10b)
Pale yellow oil (610 mg, 100%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.44 – 7.28 (m, 7H), 7.26 – 7.17 (m, 1H), 6.95 – 6.82 (m, 2H), 6.47 – 6.35 (m, 2H), 5.75 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.22 – 5.13 (m, 1H), 4.48 – 4.33 (m, 3H), 4.20 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.24 (dd, J = 5.8, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (d, J = 18.5 Hz, 1H), 2.52 – 2.16 (m, 7H), 1.72 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 1.10 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 157.3, 147.2, 135.8, 135.7, 134.0, 133.7, 133.1, 130.8, 129.70, 129.67, 128.9, 128.8, 128.3, 127.9, 127.6, 127.5, 123.5, 120.5, 118.6, 112.0, 110.0, 91.7, 69.3, 58.9, 55.2, 46.4, 43.6, 43.5, 43.1, 41.1, 35.7, 26.8, 20.3, 19.3
(−)-3-N-(4′-methoxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-6-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (10c)
Pale yellow oil (540 mg, 97%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.81 – 7.73 (m, 2H), 7.70 – 7.61 (m, 2H), 7.46 – 7.25 (m, 8H), 6.97 – 6.80 (m, 2H), 6.44 (s, 2H), 5.74 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.25 – 5.06 (m, 1H), 4.36 (dd, J = 6.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (d, J = 24.0 Hz, 2H), 4.25 – 4.15 (m, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.25 (dd, J = 6.1, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.97 (d, J = 18.5 Hz, 1H), 2.50 – 2.17 (m, 4H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.78 – 1.66 (m, 2H), 1.08 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 158.7, 147.0, 135.81, 135.75, 134.0, 133.8, 133.1, 131.9, 130.8, 129.7, 129.0, 128.8, 128.2, 127.6, 123.7, 118.6, 113.9, 111.7, 91.7, 69.1, 59.0, 55.2, 48.2, 46.5, 43.4, 43.1, 41.1, 35.7, 26.9, 20.3, 19.4
Representative Procedure for the Preparation of 11a–c
TBAF (2.1 mL, 1M in THF) was added to a solution of 10a (910 mg, 1.42 mmol) in THF (5 mL). The solution was stirred at rt overnight. Next, 1M HCl (30 mL) was added to the solution, which was then washed with ethyl acetate (3×20 mL). The aqueous layer was basified with concentrated ammonium hydroxide (28%), and extracted with dichloromethane (3×20 mL). The combined organic extract was dried over Na2SO4, then filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified over silica gel (EtOAc/Et3N 10:1), and the product was dissolved in ethyl acetate (60 mL), washed with water (4×10 mL), brine, and dried over Na2SO4, then filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford the product as a yellow oil. The oil was dissolved in 10 mL of ethyl acetate, 1N ethereal HCl (3 mL) was added and concentrated. The resulting pale yellow solid was washed with minimal ethyl acetate and CH2Cl2 to afford 525 mg of pure 11a as a dihydrochloride 1.6 hydrate), 73% yield (mp = 195°C, dec.)
3-(2′-methoxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (11a)
Pale yellow solid (419 mg, 98%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.25 (dd, J = 14.7, 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.46 (s, 2H), 5.62 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (dd, J = 18.1, 9.0 Hz, 2H), 4.08 (s, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.31 m, 1H), 3.00 (d, J = 18.5 Hz, 1H), 2.62 – 2.17 (m, 4H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.02 (td, J = 12.2, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 1.85 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.30, 146.16, 133.06, 130.67, 129.10, 128.98, 128.29, 127.48, 123.91, 120.40, 119.47, 112.75, 110.18, 90.99, 66.34, 58.95, 55.25, 46.50, 44.17, 43.04, 42.86, 40.86, 35.74, 20.25. m.p.: 194°C (dec.) (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C25H28N2O3•2HCl•H2O: C, 60.61; H, 6.51; N, 5.65. Found: C, 60.50, H, 6.49; N, 5.44.
3-(3′-methoxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (11b)
White solid (525 mg, 83%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.25 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (dd, J = 19.3, 7.9 Hz, 2H), 5.67 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (s, 2H), 4.13 (s, 1H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.39 – 3.21 (m, 1H), 3.01 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 2H), 2.69 – 2.20 (m, 7H), 2.13 – 1.93 (m, 1H), 1.86 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.76, 145.73, 141.23, 133.03, 130.46, 129.55, 129.07, 128.47, 124.06, 119.78, 119.60, 113.07, 112.58, 112.27, 91.12, 66.41, 58.95, 55.14, 48.75, 46.51, 43.07, 42.95, 40.92, 35.83, 20.26; m.p.: 195°C (dec.) (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C25H28N2O3•2HCl•1.6H2O: C, 59.31; H, 6.61; N, 5.53. Found: C, 59.37, H, 6.29; N, 5.47.
3-(4′-methoxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (11c)
Pale yellow solid (380 mg, 100%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.26 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 5.31 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1H), 5.10 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (s, 2H), 4.35 (s, 1H), 4.18 (s, 1H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 3.31 (t, J = 18.5 Hz, 2H), 3.24 – 3.06 (m, 3H), 3.02 – 2.78 (m, 1H), 2.92 (s, 3H), 2.44 (t, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 2.04 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.78, 145.67, 133.06, 131.47, 130.59, 129.02, 128.89, 128.47, 123.96, 119.57, 113.92, 112.10, 91.08, 66.38, 58.96, 55.24, 48.20, 46.53, 43.10, 42.95, 40.94, 35.85, 20.25; m.p.: 198°C (dec.) (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C25H28N2O3•2HCl•H2O: C, 60.61; H, 6.51; N, 5.65. Found: C, 60.40, H, 6.64; N, 5.52.
Representative Procedure for the Preparation of 12a–c
To a solution of 11b (425 mg, 0.89 mmol) in dichloromethane (10 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere was added BBr3 (1M, 2 mL in dichloromethane) at RT, then stirred at room temperature for 3 days. After completion, the reaction was carefully quenched with methanol, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The product was then dissolved in 1M HCl (30 mL), washed with CH2Cl2 (2x), then the aqueous layer was basified with concentrated ammonium hydroxide (28%), extracted with CH2Cl2 (3x), and the combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4, then filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified over silica gel (EtOAc/Et3N 10:1, EtOAc/Et3N/MeOH 10:1:0.1, EtOAc/Et3N/MeOH 10:1:1) to give a purple foam. The foam was dissolved in a minimal amount of dichloromethane and stirred with excess 1N ethereal HCl. The mixture was concentrated and the resulting white solid was washed with CH2Cl2 and dried to afford 125 mg of the pure 12b as a dihydrochloride 1.6 hydrate, 30% yield (m.p.: 190°C, dec.).
3-(2′-hydroxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (12a)
Pale yellow solid (112 mg, 41%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.23 (m, 2H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.82 – 6.72 (m, 2H), 5.77 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (q, J = 12.6 Hz, 2H), 4.44 (s, 1H), 4.26 (s, 1H), 3.49 – 2.86 (m, 6H), 3.01 (s, 1H), 2.53 (t, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.10 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 0.10 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 157.68, 153.74, 135.67, 135.16, 133.10, 132.41, 132.01, 126.25, 124.92, 121.57, 120.62, 118.37, 116.84, 116.12, 94.16, 66.97, 61.68, 51.27, 42.91, 41.77, 39.48, 33.69, 22.91; m.p.: 190°C (dec.) (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C24H26N2O3•2HCl•1.6H2O: C, 58.56; H, 6.39; N, 5.69. Found: C, 58.46, H, 6.46; N, 5.33.
3-(3′-hydroxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (12b)
Pale yellow solid (125 mg, 30%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.20 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.95 – 6.76 (m, 4H), 5.79 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (m, 3H), 4.45 (s, 1H), 4.27 (s, 1H), 3.48 – 2.87 (m, 7H), 3.01 (s, 3H), 2.53 (t, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.14 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 1.42 – 1.25 (m, 1H), 0.07 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 159.03, 153.76, 135.65, 135.24, 133.36, 132.12, 131.12, 126.28, 124.87, 122.27, 121.74, 118.24, 117.54, 116.81, 94.26, 66.98, 61.70, 55.03, 42.95, 41.78, 39.54, 33.69, 22.93; m.p.: 190°C (dec.) (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C24H26N2O3•2HCl•1.6H2O: C, 58.56; H, 6.39; N, 5.69. Found: C, 58.58, H, 6.66; N, 5.75.
3-(4′-hydroxybenzyl)amino-7,8-didehydro-4,5-epoxy-17-methyl-(5α,6α)-morphinan-6-ol (12c)
Pale yellow solid (71 mg, 26%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.25 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (m, 3H), 5.78 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H), 5.40 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (s, 3H), 4.27 (s, 1H), 3.50 – 2.87 (m, 6H), 3.02 (s, 3H), 2.53 (m, 1H), 2.14 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1H), 0.10 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 159.05, 152.90, 134.66, 134.43, 132.19, 131.16, 125.28, 124.14, 121.40, 120.71, 115.63, 115.47, 93.26, 65.96, 60.70, 54.00, 41.93, 40.77, 38.56, 32.69, 21.93; m.p.: 198°C (dec.) (HCl salt); Anal. Calcd for C24H26N2O3•2HCl•1.6H2O: C, 54.57; H, 6.72; N, 5.30. Found: C, 54.76, H, 6.63; N, 5.52.
2-Nitro-3-trifluoromethylsulfonyloxy-N-cyclopropylmethylmorphinan (14)
2-Nitro-3-hydroxy-N-cyclopropylmethylmorphinan 139 (2.4 g, 6.7 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane (50 mL) and Et3N (3.2 mL, 19.3 mmol). The mixture was cooled to 0°C, and then Tf2O (1.8 mL, 9.6 mmol) was added. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. The solution was diluted with dichloromethane (60 mL), washed sequentially with saturated sodium carbonate solution and brine, and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The organic layer was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a crude product, which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (Hexanes : EtOAc: Et3N = 70:30:1 ) to give 2.8 g of 14 in 88% yield, as a slightly yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.27 (s, 1H), 3.23 – 3.12 (m, 1H), 3.05 (d, J = 19.1, 1H), 2.82 – 2.64 (m, 2H), 2.53 – 2.42 (m, 1H), 2.38 – 2.25 (m, 2H), 2.03 – 0.77 (m, 11H), 0.54 (d, J = 7.9, 2H), 0.12 (d, J = 4.7, 2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.91, 140.10, 139.91, 138.45, 125.56, 121.31, 59.85, 54.86, 44.98, 44.09, 41.28, 38.94, 36.40, 26.68, 26.09, 24.42, 21.79, 9.24, 4.09, 3.66.
Synthesis of 2-Nitro-N-cyclopropylmethylmorphinan (15)
Triflate 14 (142 mg, 0.3 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (7.8 mg, 0.03 mmol), and dppp (12.4 mg, 0.03 mmol) were dissolved in anhydrous DMF (0.8 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere. Next, Et3SiH (120 μL, 0.75 mmol) was added to the mixture and stirred at 60°C overnight. The cooled reaction mixture was directly purified over silica gel (Hexanes: EtOAc: Et3N = 70:30:1) to afford 52 mg of 15 as a yellow oil, 53% yield. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.00 (m, 2H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.5, 1H), 3.07 (m, 2H), 2.72 (m, 2H), 2.40 (m, 2H), 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.25 (m, 10H), 0.53 (m, 2H), 0.12 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.02, 145.67, 139.43, 126.54, 122.51, 121.27, 59.83, 55.22, 45.23, 44.55, 41.44, 38.51, 36.40, 26.78, 26.28, 24.94, 22.07, 9.18, 4.09, 3.68.
Synthesis of 2-amino-N-cyclopropylmethylmorphinan (16)
Compound 16 was prepared according to the published procedure.10a
Synthesis of 2-amino-N-cyclopropylmethyl-N′-m-hydroxybenzylmorphinan (17)
m-Anisaldehyde (99 μL, 0.85 mmol) and anhydrous Na2SO4 (10 mg) were added to the solution of 16 (50 mg, 0.17 mmol) in MeOH (2 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. NaBH4 (32.3 mg, 0.8 mmol) was then added and stirred at RT for 4 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in 10 mL 1N HCl and washed with ethyl acetate (2×10 mL), then basified with ammonium hydroxide until pH ~ 11 was reached. The aqueous solution was then extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×10 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified over silica gel (Hexane/EtOAc/Et3N=40/30/1) to afford 17 as a colorless oil (52 mg, 73%)
To a solution of 17 (52 mg, 0.12) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (2 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere was added BBr3 (2 mL, 1M in CH2Cl2) at 0°C, then stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction was carefully quenched with excess MeOH, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The resulting dark oil was dissolved in MeOH (3 mL), refluxed for 15 min. Next, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the product was dissolved in 10 mL 1M HCl, washed with ethyl acetate twice, then the aqueous layer was basified with ammonium hydroxide (28% aqueous solution), and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2x). The combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4, then filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified over silica gel (EtOAc/MeOH/Et3N = 50/1/1) to afford 17) as a white foam (37 mg, 78%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.23 (m, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 6.76 (m, 3H), 6.34 (m, 2H), 4.34 (s, 2H), 4.06 (s, 1H), 3.14 (s, 1H), 2.77 (d, J = 18.5, 1H), 2.58 (m, 1H), 2.41 (m, 1H), 2.12 (m, 4H), 1.62 (m, 2H), 1.21 (m, 8H), 0.76 (d, J = 12.8, 1H), 0.53 (m, 2H), 0.11 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.72, 145.56, 141.60, 137.87, 129.70, 128.80, 126.42, 117.31, 114.70, 113.26, 111.80, 109.73, 59.50, 55.47, 46.95, 45.58, 43.93, 41.54, 36.47, 36.05, 26.64, 26.39, 24.33, 21.95, 8.41, 4.18, 4.13. (HCl salt) m.p. 173–175°C. Anal. Calc. for C20H28N3 •2HCl•0.7H2O: C, 66.44; H, 7.72; N, 5.74. Found: C, 66.43, H, 7.87; N, 5.68
Opioid binding to the human κ, δ, and μ opioid receptors
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with the human κ opioid receptor (hKOR-CHO) were obtained from Dr. Liu-Yuan Liu-Chen (Temple University, Philadelphia, PA). CHO cells expressing the human δ-opioid receptor (hDOR-CHO) were obtained from Dr. Larry Toll (SRI International, Palo Alto, CA), and the μ-opioid receptor (hMOR-CHO) were obtained from Dr. George Uhl (NIDA Intramural Program, Baltimore, MD). The cells were grown in 100-mm dishes in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin–streptomycin (10,000 U/mL) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The affinity and selectivity of the compounds for the multiple opioid receptors were determined by incubating the membranes with radiolabeled ligands and 12 different concentrations of the compounds at 25 °C in a final volume of 1 mL of 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5. Incubation times of 60 min were used for the κ-selective peptide [3H]DAMGO and the mu-selective ligand [3H]U69,593. A 3-h incubation was used with the δ-selective antagonist [3H]naltrindole.
[35S]GTPγS binding studies to determine the pharmacological properties of the compounds
Membranes from CHO cells stably expressing either the human κ or μ opioid receptor were used in the experiments. Cells were scraped from tissue culture plates and then centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min at 4°C. The cells were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 0.04% EDTA. After centrifugation at 1000g for 10 min at 4 °C, the cell pellet was resuspended in membrane buffer, which consisted of 50 mM Tris–HCl, 3 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.4. The membranes were homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer, followed by centrifugation at 40,000g for 20 min at 4 °C. The membrane pellet was resuspended in membrane buffer, and those transfected with the centrifugation step was repeated. The membranes were then resuspended in assay buffer, which consisted of 50 mM Tris–HCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.2 mM EGTA, pH 7.4. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay using bovine serum albumin as the standard. The membranes were frozen at −80°C until used.
CHO cell membranes expressing either the human κ opioid receptor (15 μg of protein per tube) or μ opioid receptor (7.5 μg of protein per tube) were incubated with 12 different concentrations of the agonist in assay buffer for 60 min at 30 °C in a final volume of 0.5 mL. The reaction mixture contained 3 μM GDP and 80 pmol of [35S]GTPγS. Basal activity was determined in the presence of 3 μM GDP and in the absence of an agonist, and nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 μM unlabeled GTPγS. Then, the membranes were filtered onto glass fiber filters by vacuum filtration, followed by three washes with 3 mL of ice-cold 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5. Samples were counted in 2 mL of ScintiSafe 30% scintillation fluid. Data represent the percent of agonist-stimulation [35S]GTPγS binding over the basal activity, defined as [(specific binding/basal binding) × 100] − 100. All experiments were repeated at least three times and were performed in triplicate. To determine antagonist activity of a compound at the μ opioid receptors, CHO membranes expressing the μ opioid receptor were incubated with the compound in the presence of 200 nM of the agonist DAMGO. To determine antagonist activity of a compound at the κ opioid receptors, CHO membranes expressing the κ opioid receptor were incubated with the compound in the presence of 100 nM of the κ agonist U50,488.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grants R01-DA14251(J. L. N.) and K05-DA00360 (J. M. B.)
Abbreviations
- MOR
mu opioid receptor
- KOR
kappa opioid receptor
- DOR
delta opioid receptor
- BINAP
2,2′-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1′-binaphthyl
- TBDPS
tert-butyl(diphenyl)silyl
- TBAF
tetrabutylammonium fluoride
- TM
transmembrane domain
- TIPP
H-Tyr-Tic-Phe-Phe-OH
- Bcp
4-[N-((4′-phenyl)phenethyl)carboxamido]-phenylalanine
- Dbcp
2′,6,-dinaphthyl-4′-[N-((4′-phenyl)-phenethyl)carboxamido]-phenylalanine
References
- 1.Mercadante S, Villari P, Ferrera P, Casuccio A, Fulfaro F. Rapid Titration with Intravenous Morphine for Severe Cancer Pain and Immediate Oral Conversion. Cancer. 2002;95:203–208. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJ, Janssen PA, Van Ree JM. Narcotic Cueing Properties of Intraventricularly Administered Sufentanil, Fentanyl, Morphine, and met-Enkephalin. Eur J Pharmacol. 1978;47:115–119. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(78)90381-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Niemegeers CJ, Schellekens KH, Van Bever WF, Janssen P. A Sufentanil, a Very Potent and Extremely Safe Intravenous Morphine-like Compound in Mice, Rats, and Dogs. Arzneimittel forschung. 1976;26:1551–1556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen ZR, Irvine RJ, Somogyi AA, Bochner F. Mu Receptor Binding of Some Commonly Used Opioids and their Metabolites. Life Sciences. 1991;48:2165–2171. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(91)90150-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Riley J, Eisenberg E, Müller-Schwefe G, Drewes AM, Arendt-Nielsen L. Oxycodone: a Review of its Use in the Management of Pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:175–192. doi: 10.1185/030079908x253708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aldrich JV, Vigil-Cruz SC. Narcotic Analgesics. In: Abraham D, editor. Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery. 7. Vol. 6. John Wiley& Sons; New York: 2003. pp. 329–481. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Furst S, Hosztafi S, Friedmann T. Structure-Activity Relationships of Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioid Agonists and Antagonists. Curr Med Chem. 1995;1:423–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Aldrich JV. Analgesics. In: Wolff ME, editor. Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery. Vol. 3. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1996. pp. 321–441. [Google Scholar]; (c) Mascarella SW, Bai X, Williams W, Sine B, Bowen WD, Carroll FI. (−)-cis-N-(Para-, Meta-, and Ortho-substituted benzyl)-N-normetazocines: Synthesis and Binding Affinity at the [3H]-(+)-Pentazocine-Labeled (δ 1) Site and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Studies. J Med Chem. 1995;38:565–569. doi: 10.1021/jm00003a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Reden J, Reich MF, Rice KC, Jacobson AE, Brossi A. Deoxymorphines: Role of the Phenolic Hydroxyl in the Antinociception and Opiate Receptor Interactions. J Med Chem. 1979;22:256–259. doi: 10.1021/jm00189a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Hedberg MH, Johansson AM, Fowler CJ, Terenius L, Hacksell U. Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of C3-Substituted 3-Deoxymorphines. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1994;4:2527–2532. [Google Scholar]; (f) Kubota H, Rothman RB, Dersch C, McCullough K, Pinto J, Rice KC. Synthesis and Biological Activity of 3-Substituted 3-Deoxynaltrindole Derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1999;8:799–804. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00105-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berezowska I, Chung NN, Lemieux C, Wilkes BC, Schiller PW. Agonist vs. Antagonist Behavior of δ Opioid Petides Cotaining Novel Phenylalanine Analogues in Place of Tyr. J Med Chem. 2009;52:6941–6945. doi: 10.1021/jm9004913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Peng X, Knapp BI, Bidlack JM, Neumeyer JL. High-Affinity Carbamate Analogues of Morphinan at Opioid Receptors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;15:1508–1511. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Peng X, Knapp BI, Bidlack JM, Neumeyer JL. In-vitro Investigation of Oxazol and Urea Analogues of Morphinan at Opioid Receptors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15:4106–4112. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.03.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Zhang A, Xiong W, Hilbert JE, DeVita EK, Bidlack JM, Neumeyer JL. 2-Aminothiazole-Derived Opioids. Bioisosteric Replacement of Phenols. J Med Chem. 2004;47:1886–1888. doi: 10.1021/jm049978n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang A, Vliet SV, Neumeyer JL. Synthesis of aminothiazole derived morphinans. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:6459–6462. [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang T, Yan Z, Sromek A, Knapp BI, Scrimale T, Bidlack JM, Neumeyer JL. Aminothiazolomorphinans with Mixed κ and μ Opioid Activity. J Med Chem. 2011;54:1903–1913. doi: 10.1021/jm101542c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sagara T, Egashira H, Okamura M, Fujii I, Shimohigashi Y, Kanematsu K. Ligand Recognition in mu Opioid receptor: Experimentally Based Modeling of mu Opioid Receptor Binding Sites and Their Testing by Ligand Docking. Bioorg Med Chem. 1996;4:2151–2166. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(96)00219-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pogozheva ID, Lomize AL, Mosberg HI. Opioid Receptor Three-Dimensional Structures from Distance Geometry Calculations with Hydrogen Bonding Constraints. Biophys J. 1998;75:612–634. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wentland MP, Xu G, Cioffi CL, Ye Y, Duan W, Cohen DJ, Colasurdo AM, Bidlack JM. 8-Aminocyclazocine Analogues: Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationships. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2000;9:183–187. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(99)00670-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wentland MP, Duan W, Cohen DJ, Bidlack JM. Selective Protection and Functionalization of Morphine: Synthesis and Opioid Receptor Binding Properties of 3-Amino-3-desoxymorphine Derivatives. J Med Chem. 2000;43:3558–3565. doi: 10.1021/jm000119i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Decker M, Si YG, Knapp BI, Bidlack JM, Neumeyer JL. Synthesis and Opioid Receptor Binding Affinities of 2-Subtituted and 3-Aminomorphinans: Ligands for μ, κ, and δ Opioid Receptors. J Med Chem. 2010;53:402–418. doi: 10.1021/jm9013482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Neumeyer JL, Bidlack JM, Zong R, Bakthavachalam V, Gao P, Cohen DJ, Negus SS, Mello NK. Synthesis and Opioid Receptor Affinity of Morphinan and Benzomorphan Derivatives: Mixed κ Agonists and μ Agonists/Antagonists as Potential Pharmacotherapeutics for Cocaine Dependence. J Med Chem. 2000;43:114–122. doi: 10.1021/jm9903343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wolfe JP, Buchwald SL. Palladium-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Triflates. J Org Chem. 1997;62:1264–1267. doi: 10.1021/jo991699y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gribble GW, Nutaitis CF. Reactions of Sodium Borohydride in Acidic Media: N-Methylation of Amines with Paraformaldehyde/Trifluoroacetic Acid. Synthesis. 1987;1987:709–711. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang A, Xiong W, Bidlack JM, Hilbert JE, Knapp BI, Wentland MP, Neumeyer JL. 10-Ketomorphinan and 3-Substituted-3-desoxymorphinan Analogues as Mixed κ and μ Opioid Ligands: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Their Binding Affinity at Opioid Receptors. J Med Chem. 2004;47:165–174. doi: 10.1021/jm0304156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hupp CD, Neumeyer JL. Rapid Access to Morphinones: Removal of 4,5-Ether Bridge with Pd-catalyzed Triflate Reduction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:2359–2361. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.02.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Csutoras C, Zhang A, Zhang K, Kula NS, Baldessarini RJ, Neumeyer JL. Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of R(−)-N-alkyl-11-hydroxynoraporphines and Their Esters. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004;12:3553–3559. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]































































