Abstract
A highly stereoselective synthesis of the C(22)-C(36) fragment 2 of reidispongiolide A is described. This synthesis features the highly stereoselective mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration reaction of the aldehyde derived from 5 and the new chiral reagent (S)-(E)-7 that provides 12 with >15:1 d.r. Subsequent coupling of the derived vinyl iodide 3 with aldehyde 16 provided allylic alcohol 17, that was elaborated by three steps into the targeted reidispongiolide fragment 2.
Keywords: Studies on the synthesis of reidispongiolide A, Mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration, Stereoselective synthesis of the anti, anti stereotriad
1. Introduction
The reidispongiolides and sphinxolides are structurally related, biologically active families of marine natural products isolated from the New Caledonian sponges Reidispongia coerulea and Neosiphonia superstes.1–4 According to previous research, these compounds inhibit actin filament assembly assembling and induce F-actin depolymerization.5 These compounds also have the ability to circumvent multi-drug resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein in cell-based assays.5 Reidispongiolide A, the most active member of reidispongiolide family, exhibits potent cytotoxicity against various human cancer cell lines (IC50 0.01 to 0.16 μg/ml).3
The relative configuration of the C(7), C(10–15), C(24–28) and C(32–33) subunits of sphinxolide B were first assigned by J-based NMR methods.6 The relative and absolute stereochemistry of the C(17–22)7, C(22–35)8 and C(5–16)9 subunits of reidispongiolide A were assigned via asymmetric synthesis. The absolute configuration of this family of natural products was determined from the actin-bound X-ray crystal structure of reidispongiolide A.10
The structure complexity and biological properties of reidispongiolide A have stimulated interest in its synthesis. The total synthesis of reidispongiolide A was reported by Paterson and co-workers in 2007.11,9,12 More recently, Suenaga and co-workers reported the synthesis of the C(11–22) and C(23–35) fragments of 1.13 Because recent research suggests that the C(24)–C(36) side chain plays a very important role in the binding of the reisipongiolides to the actin target,14,15 we have focused our current efforts on this segment of the natural product.
We report here a highly stereoselective synthesis of the reidispongiolide A C(22)–C(36) subunit 2 that proceeds along the general outline of the retrosynthetic analysis that is presented in Scheme 1. The synthetic target 2 possesses seven stereocenters, including the C(26)–C(28) anti-anti stereotriad that represents a historically difficult challenge for synthesis via asymmetric aldol or crotylmetalation reactions,16 as this bond construction is stereochemically mismatched. However, synthesis of the anti, anti stereotriad with exceptional stereochemical control is now possible by virtue of the remarkable enantioselectivity of the new α-stannyl crotylborane 7 that is accessible via enantioselective hydroboration of racemic allene 8 with diisopinocampheylborane [(Ipc)2BH].17,18 Thus, by application of this new crotylboration technology we anticipated that vinyl iodide intermediate 3 could be assembled via α-stannylcrotylboration of the aldehyde deriving from 5 with the chiral reagent (S)-(E)-7. Similarly, we anticipated that vinyl iodide fragment 4 would be accessible via α-stannylallylboration of the aldehyde deriving from 6 with the a-stannylallylborane (R)-9 that is readily accessible via the hydroboration of allenylstannane 10 with [(lIpc)2BH].19
Scheme 1.
Retrosynthetic Analysis of 2
2. Results and Discussion
The synthesis of fragment 3 (Scheme 2) starts from the primary alcohol 6 which is prepared in two steps from commercially available precuresors.20 Alcohol 6 was oxidized to the corresponding aldehyde using a Swern procedure21 and then the aldehyde was treated with the diisopropyl (R,R)-tartrate (E)-crotylboronate reagent22 to give the known homoallylic alcohol 11 in 88% yield with 14:1 diastereoselectivity.23 Protection of the hydroxyl group of 11 as a TBS ether followed by PMB ether deprotection with DDQ24 provided primary alcohol 5 in 69% yield over the two steps. Alcohol 5 was then oxidized to the corresponding aldehyde and then added to a solution of α-stannylcrotylborane (S)-(E)-7 that was generated, as previously described, via the hydroboration of racemic allene 8 with (dIpc)2BH.17 This reaction proceeded overnight at ambient temperature and provided the vinylstannane product 12, with the requisite anti-anti stereochemistry at C(26–28), in 66% yield with >15:1 d.r. The stereochemistry of 12 was assigned by analogy to related mismatched double asymmetric reactions described elsewhere.18 Treatment of 12 with I2 in Et2O effected tin-iodine exchange and afforded vinyl iodide 13 in 73% yield. O-Methylation of the hindered hydroxyl group of 13 proved challenging. Attempted use of NaH and MeI for this step caused partial migration of the TBS unit between two hydroxyl groups, while use of Me3OBF4 and Proton Sponge® led to partial deprotection of TBS ether. Fortunately, use of MeOTf and 2,6-di-tbutylpyridine resulted in a very clean reaction that provided 3 in 85% yield.25
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of Vinyl Iodide 3
Alcohol 6 also served as the starting material for synthesis of vinyl iodide fragment 4. The aldehyde generated by Swern oxidation of 6 was added to a −78 °C solution the α-stannylallylborane reagent (R)-9, generated by the hydroboration of allenylstannane 10 with (lIpc)2BH as previously described,19 to give 14 in 67% yield and with >50:1 d.r. The (R)-stereochemistry of the hydroxyl group of 14 was assigned by using the Mosher ester method. Treatment of 14 with I2 followed by alcohol O-methylation gave vinyl iodide 4 in 80% yield. Deprotection of PMB ether of 4 gave the primary alcohol 15 in 76% yield, which was then oxidized under Dess-Martin oxidation26 conditions to give aldehyde 16. Aldehyde 16 is not stable for long-term storage and was usually freshly prepared before immediately before use in subsequent chemistry.
Treatment of vinyl iodide 3 with t-BuLi at −78 °C generated the corresponding the vinyllithium intermediate which was then treated with aldehyde 16, also at − 78 °C. This reaction gave alcohol 17 in 50% yield as a ca. 2: 1 mixture of diastereomers (Scheme 4). This mixture was of no consequence, as both alcohols smoothly were oxidized in the next step upon treatment with the Dess-Martin periodinane reagent. The resulting enone was then treated with Stryker’s copper hydride reagent27 to give ketone 18 in 60% yield from 17. It was anticipated that 18 would be a suitable substrate for introduction of the N-methylformamide unit, by application of Porco’s procedure.28–31 While this proved to be the case, a small amount of epimerization occurred at C(32) in the conversion of 18 to 2 owing to the basicity of these reaction conditions. Unfortunately, the epimerization at C(32) could not be avoided, and the best result that we obtained was a 13:1 mixture of 2 and its (C32)-eipmer.
Scheme 4.
Initial Studies on the Coupling of Vinyl Iodide 3 and Aldehyde 16
Fortunately, this epimerization process could be avoided by introducing the N-methyl formamide unit prior to oxidation of the C(31)-alcohols (Scheme 5). Thus, the N-methyl formamide was introduced at the stage of alcohol 17 to give 19 in 72% yield.30,31 Subsequent oxidation of 19 with the Dess-Martin periodinane reagent, followed by reduction of the enone using Stryker’s copper hydride reagent afforded 2 in 50% over the final two steps. The 1H NMR spectrum of 2 showed no evidence of epimerization of the C32 stereocenter.
Scheme 5.

Completion of the Synthesis of 2
3. Conclusion
In summary, we have developed a highly stereoselective synthesis of C(22)-C(36) fragment 2 of reidispongiolide A that features the highly stereoselective mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration reaction of the aldehyde derived from 5 and the new chiral reagent (S)-(E)-7 that provides 12 with >15:1 d.r. Subsequent coupling of the derived vinyl iodide 3 with aldehyde 16 provided allylic alcohol 17, that was elaborated by three steps into the targeted reidispongiolide fragment 2. This work sets the stage for further studies on the chemistry and biology of reidispongiolide A, that will be reported in due course.
4. Experimental
General Experimental Details
All reaction solvents were purified before use. Tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane, diethyl ether, and toluene were purified by passing through a solvent column composed of activated A-1 alumina. Unless indicated otherwise, all reactions were conducted under an atmosphere of argon using flame-dried or oven-dried (170 °C) glassware. 4A molecular sieves were activated under high vacuum with at 180 °C for 12 h and re-activated through flame-drying immediately prior to use.
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectra were recorded on commercial instruments at 400 or 500 MHz. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR) spectra were recorded at 100 MHz. The proton signal for residual non-deuterated solvent (δ 7.26 for CHCl3) was used as an internal reference for 1H NMR spectra. For 13C NMR spectra, chemical shifts are reported relative to the δ 77.16 resonance of CHCl3. Coupling constants are reported in Hz. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded as films on an FTIR instrument. Mass spectra were recorded on a commercial spectrometer. Optical rotations were measured on a polarimeter using a 10-cm, 1-mL quartz cell.
(2S,3S,4S)-1-((4-methoxybenzyl)oxy)-2,4-dimethylhex-5-en-3-ol (11)
A solution of the oxalyl chloride (1 mL, 11.4 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added DMSO (1.86 mL, 26 mmol) dropwise at −78°C. This mixture was stirred for 15 min, then a solution of alcohol 6 (2.10 g, 10 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78°C for 30 min. Diisopropylethylamine (9.2 mL, 52.8 mmol) was then added and the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. The mixture was diluted with Et2O (100 mL). The organic phase was separated and washed with 1N HCl, sat aq NaHCO3 solution and brine, and then dried over MgSO4. Filtration and concentration of this solution under reduced pressure provided the aldehyde as colorless oil, which was used immediately in the next step without further purification.
A 1.0 M solution of diisopropyl (R,R)-tartrate (E)-crotylboronate in toluene (20 mL, 20 mmol) was added to a slurry of powdered 4Å molecular sieves (0.4 g) in toluene (10 mL) at ambient temperature. The mixture was stirred for 20 min, then was cooled to −78°C and a solution of the aldehyde in toluene (10 mL) was added dropwise. After being stirred for 8 h at −78°C, the reaction mixture was quenched by 1 M NaOH (40 mL). The resulting two-phase mixture was stirred vigorously for 30 min, and extracted with Et2O (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (4:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the known alcohol 11 (2.32 g, 88% for two steps) as colorless oil.23
(2S,3S,4S)-3-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-2,4-dimethylhex-5-en-1-ol (5)
A solution of the alcohol 11 (1.79 g, 6.8 mmol) and 2,6-lutidine (1.6 mL, 13.6 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (60 mL) at −78 °C was treated with TBSOTf (1.85 mL, 10.2 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h and warmed to 0 °C over 30 min. The reaction was quenched by addition of saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (30 mL). The resulting mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (9:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the known TBS ether (2.29 g, 89%) as a colorless oil.23
To a 0 °C stirred CH2Cl2 solution (40 mL) of the above TBS ether (2.29 g, 6.06 mmol) was added a small amount of pH 7 buffer (5% relative to CH2Cl2) followed by DDQ (1.66 g, 7.3 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 0°C for 30 min, then was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for another 30 min. The mixture was then diluted with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (50 mL) and was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were treated with NaBH4 (500 mg, 12.5 mmol) and then washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, and brine. The extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (4:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the known alcohol 5 (1.23 g, 78%) as a colorless oil.32
(3S,4S,5S,6S,7S,E)-6-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-3,5,7-trimethyl-1-(tributylstannyl)nona-1,8-dien-4-ol (12)
To a solution of oxalyl chloride (0.19 mL, 2.32 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added DMSO (0.36 mL, 5.1 mmol) dropwise at −78°C. This mixture was stirred for 15 min, then a solution of alcohol 5 (500 mg, 1.93 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added dropwise and the reaction left at −78°C for 30 min. Diisopropylethylamine (1.77 mL, 10.2 mmol) was then added and the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. Et2O (50 mL) was added to dilute the mixture. The organic layer was separated and washed with 1N HCl, saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine, and then dried over MgSO4. After being filtered, this solution was concentrated under vacuum to give the aldehyde as colorless oil, which was used immediately in the next step without further purification.
Generation of α-stannylcrotylborane (S)-(E)-7 was performed as follows.17 Finely powdered (dIpc)2BH (1.05, 3.86 mmol) was weighed into a round bottom flask containing a stir bar in a glove box. Et2O (10 mL) was added to the flask and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C. Racemic allenylstannane 8 (1.33 g, 3.86 mmol) was added dropwise. This mixture was stirred for 5 h at 0 °C, during which time the solid (dIpc)2BH dissolved to leave a colorless solution of the reagent, (S)-(E)-7.
A solution of the aldehyde (theoretically 1.93 mmol) in 3 mL of Et2O was added at 0 °C dropwise to the freshly prepared solution of (S)-(E)-7. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 0 °C, then saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (6 mL) was added followed by slow addition of 30% H2O2 (3 mL). This mixture was stirred vigorously for 4 h at room temperature. After separation, the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 filtered and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (silica gel neutralized with 1% Et3N in hexanes; 50:1 hexanes-Et2O) providing alcohol 8 (766 mg, 66% yield over 2 steps) as a colorless oil: [α]D= −5.2°(c=1.03, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.06 – 5.97 (m, 2H), 5.91 (d, J = 19.2 Hz, 1H), 5.01 (m, 2H), 3.75 (dd, J = 4.1, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (dt, J = 10.0, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.33 (s, 1H), 2.52 – 2.44 (m, 1H), 2.33 – 2.25 (m, 1H), 1.77 (ddd, J = 10.0, 7.1, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.53 – 1.42 (m, 6H), 1.36 – 1.24 (m, 6H), 1.09 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.03 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.94 – 0.83 (m, 25H), 0.80 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.07 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.7, 141.7, 128.8, 114.5, 80.2, 76.5, 44.9, 41.4, 41.0, 29.3, 27.4, 26.2, 19.6, 18.3, 18.1, 13.9, 12.9, 9.6, −3.9, −4.3.. IR (neat) 3503, 2957, 2927, 1641, 1596, 1464, 1252 cm−1; HRMS m/z for C30H62O2SiSnH [M+H]+ calcd 603.3619, found 603.3645.
(3S,4S,5S,6S,7S,E)-6-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-1-iodo-3,5,7-trimethylnona-1,8-dien-4-ol (13)
To a solution of vinylstannane 12 (766 mg, 1.27 mmol) in Et2O (20 mL) was added iodine (381 mg, 1.5 mmol) at room temperature. After being stirred for 1 h, the reaction was diluted with saturated aqueous Na2S2O3. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were treated with KF/Celite (700 mg per mmol of 12). This solution was stirred vigorously for at least 2 h and then filtered through Celite. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (9:1 hexanes-Et2O) provided the vinyl iodide 13 (406 mg, 73%) as a colorless oil: [α]D= −17.6°(c=0.98, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.63 (dd, J = 14.6, 9.4 Hz, 1H), 6.07 – 5.97 (m, 2H), 5.09 – 4.98 (m, 2H), 4.01 (s, 1H), 3.70 (t, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (dt, J = 10.3, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.56 – 2.47 (m, 1H), 2.33 – 2.24 (m, 1H), 1.85 – 1.75 (m, 1H), 1.10 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.05 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.79 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.13 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 147.8, 141.2, 114.7, 81.4, 76.4, 74.7, 43.9, 41.2, 40.3, 26.1, 20.3, 18.3, 17.7, 13.7, −3.9, −4.5. IR (neat) 3480, 2959, 2930, 1640, 1602, 1463, 1254 cm−1; HRMS m/z for C18H35O2SiIH [M+H]+ calcd 439.1529 found 439.1525.
tert-butyl(((3S,4S,5S,6S,7S,E)-9-iodo-6-methoxy-3,5,7-trimethylnona-1,8-dien-4-yl)oxy)dimethylsilane (3)
To a stirred solution of freshly distilled MeOTf (0.52 mL, 4.7 mmol) in 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine (2.06 mL, 9 mmol) was added alcohol 13 (110 mg, 0.25 mmol) in CHCl3 (6 mL). The reaction mixture was then heated to reflux for 15 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature and NH4OH (2 mL, aqueous) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred for 2h at room temperature and then was poured into 30 mL of water. Once the organic layer separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL) and the combined organic layers was washed with 1N HCl, brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (100:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the vinyl iodide 3 (96 mg, 81%) as a colorless oil: [α]D= −6.8°(c=1.04, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.58 (dd, J = 14.6, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.00 (dd, J = 14.6, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 5.88 – 5.78 (m, 1H), 5.05 – 4.98 (m, 2H), 3.82 (dd, J = 4.5, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (s, 3H), 2.90 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 2.51 – 2.41 (m, 1H), 2.34 – 2.23 (m, 1H), 1.74 – 1.65 (m, 1H), 1.10 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 0.77 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 148.3, 141.5, 114.5, 87.2, 74.9, 74.8, 60.8, 44.8, 42.9, 39.3, 26.3, 18.7, 18.2, 16.7, 11.9, −3.4, −3.5. IR (neat) 2959, 2929, 1640, 1602, 1462, 1252, 1093 cm−1; HRMS m/z for C19H37O2SiIH [M+H]+ calcd 453.1686 found 453.1693.
(2S,3R,E)-1-((4-methoxybenzyl)oxy)-2-methyl-6-(tributylstannyl)hex-5-en-3-ol (14)
To a −78 °C solution of oxalyl chloride (0.25 mL, 2.85 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added DMSO (0.47 mL, 6.5 mmol) dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 15 min, then a solution of alcohol 6 (525 mg, 2.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was left at −78°C for 30 min. Diisopropylethylamine (2.3 mL, 13.2 mmol) was then added and the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. Et2O (50 mL) was added and the organic layer was washed with 1N HCl, saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine and dried over MgSO4. The solution was filtered and then concentration under vacuum to provide the crude aldehyde as colorless oil, which was used immediately in the next step without further purification.
Generation of α-stannylallylborane (R)-9 was performed following the literature procedure.19 Finely powdered (lIpc)2BH (950 mg, 3.5 mmol) was weighed into a round bottom flask containing a stir bar in a glove box. Toluene (10 mL) was added to the flask and the mixture was cooled to −40 °C. Allenylstannane 10 (1.65 g, 5 mmol) was added dropwise. This mixture was allowed to warm to −20 °C over 5 h, during which time the solid (lIpc)2BH dissolved to leave a colorless solution of the reagent (R)-9.
A −78 °C solution of the aldehyde (theoretically 2.5 mmol) in 3 mL toluene was added dropwise to the freshly prepared solution of α-stannylallylborane (R)-9 in toluene. The mixture was stirred overnight at −78 °C. The reaction was then allowed to warm to 0 °C. To this mixture was added saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (6 mL) followed by slow addition of 30% H2O2 (3 mL). This mixture was stirred vigorously for 4 h at room temperature. After separation of the two phases, the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (silica gel neutralized with 1% Et3N in hexanes; 85:15 hexanes-Et2O) provided alcohol 14 (900 mg, 67% yield over two steps) as a colorless oil: [α]D= +2.2°(c=1.15, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.27 – 7.23 (m, 2H), 6.91 – 6.84 (m, 2H), 6.10 – 5.96 (m, 2H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.63 – 3.56 (m, 1H), 3.55 (dd, J = 9.2, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 3.47 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 2.48 – 2.40 (m, 1H), 2.30 – 2.21 (m, 1H), 1.92 – 1.81 (m, 1H), 1.53 – 1.44 (m, 6H), 1.33 – 1.26 (m, 6H), 0.92 – 0.85 (m, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.4, 145.7, 131.6, 130.3, 129.4, 114.0, 74.8, 74.4, 73.2, 55.4, 43.8, 38.0, 29.3, 27.4, 14.0, 13.9, 9.6. IR (neat) 3479, 2924, 1613, 1512, 1247 cm−1; HRMS m/z for C27H48O3SnH [M+H]+ calcd 541.2704 found 541.2711.
1-((((2S,3R,E)-6-iodo-3-methoxy-2-methylhex-5-en-1-yl)oxy)methyl)-4-methoxybenzene (4)
To a solution of vinylstannane 14 (900 mg, 1.67 mmol) in Et2O (30 mL) was added iodine (460 mg, 1.8 mmol) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred for 1 h, then saturated aqueous Na2S2O3 was added to reduce remaining iodine. The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were treated with KF/Celite (700 mg per mmol of 14). This mixture was stirred vigorously for at least 2 h and then filtered through Celite. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (4:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the vinyl iodide product (618 mg, 1.64 mmol) as a colorless oil.
To a mixture of the above vinyl iodide (618 mg, 1.64 mmol) and MeI (1.05 mL, 16.4 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was added 60% NaH in mineral oil (140 mg, 3.5 mmol). The reaction was stirred overnight at room temperature. The mixture wasp poured into 50 mL water, then the aqueous layer was separated and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (4:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the product 4 (524 mg, 80% yield over two steps) as a colorless oil: [α]D= −28.6° (c=1.07, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.26 – 7.22 (m, 2H), 6.92 – 6.84 (m, 2H), 6.56 (dt, J = 14.6, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (dt, J = 14.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (s, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.38 (qd, J = 9.1, 5.8 Hz, 2H), 3.32 (s, 3H), 3.24 – 3.18 (m, 1H), 2.26 (dddd, J = 14.8, 7.1, 4.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 2.20 – 2.11 (m, 1H), 2.07 – 1.96 (m, 1H), 0.90 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.3, 143.2, 130.8, 129.3, 113.9, 81.3, 76.7, 72.9, 72.0, 57.8, 55.4, 36.7, 36.4, 13.1. IR (neat) 2904, 1612, 1512, 1244, 1086 cm−1; HRMS m/z for C16H23O3INa [M+Na]+ calcd 413.0590 found 413.0592.
(2S,3R,E)-6-iodo-3-methoxy-2-methylhex-5-en-1-ol (15)
To a stirred 0° C solution of 4 (548 mg, 1.41 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) containing a small amount of pH 7 buffer (5% relative to CH2Cl2) was added DDQ (522 g, 2.3 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 0°C for 30 min, then was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for another 30 min. Saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (20 mL) was added, then the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography provided the primary alcohol 15 (290 mg, 76%) as a colorless oil: [α]D= −41.4° (c=1.15, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.55 (ddd, J = 14.7, 8.1, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (dt, J = 14.4, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.67 – 3.54 (m, 2H), 3.39 (s, 3H), 3.19 (dt, J = 7.4, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (dd, J = 7.0, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (dddd, J = 15.1, 6.5, 4.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.30 – 2.21 (m, 1H), 1.89 – 1.80 (m, 1H), 0.91 – 0.86 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 141.9, 85.1, 77.0, 66.9, 57.8, 38.0, 36.9, 13.9. IR (neat) 3405, 2928, 1606, 1083 cm−1; HRMS m/z for C8H15O2IH [M+H]+ calcd 271.0195 found 271.0204.
(1E,4R,5S,7E,9S,10S,11S,12S,13S)-12-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-1-iodo-4,10-dimethoxy-5,9,11,13-tetramethylpentadeca-1,7,14-trien-6-ol (17)
To a solution of Dess Martin periodinane (154 mg, 0.35 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added alcohol 15 (81 mg, 0.3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL). Once the reaction was complete (TLC monitoring), Et2O (10 mL), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (5 mL) and Na2S2O3 (1 mL) were added. The organic layer was separated and aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The crude aldehyde 16 was used immediately without purification in the next step.
t-BuLi (0.4 mmol, 0.25 mL, 1.6 M in pentane) was added dropwise to a −78 °C solution of vinyl iodide 3 (91 mg, 0.2 mmol) in THF (2 mL). The mixture was stirred for 30 min, then a solution of aldehyde 16 (prepared from 0.3 mmol of alcohol 15) in THF (1 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at −78°C for additional 1.5 h, then the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to 0°C. Saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution was then added to terminate the reaction. The organic layer was separated and aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (9:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the alcohol 17 (58 mg, 50%) as a colorless oil, as a mixture of two isomers (2:1 ratio). This mixture was carried to next step without separation. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.63 – 6.48 (1H), 6.16 – 6.05 (1H), 5.90 – 5.59 (2H), 5.48 – 5.33 (1H), 5.03 – 4.92 (2H), 4.26 (1H), 3.86 (1H), 3.51 – 3.43 (3H), 3.39 – 3.33 (3H), 3.30 – 3.22 (1H), 2.91 (2H), 2.52 – 2.37 (2H), 2.33 – 2.17 (2H), 1.86 – 1.74 (1H), 1.74 – 1.64 (1H), 1.15 – 1.09 (3H), 1.01 – 0.96 (m, 3H), 0.90 (9H), 0.88 – 0.82 (m, 3H), 0.79 – 0.73 (m, 3H), 0.11 – 0.07 (m, 6H).
(4R,5R,9S,10S,11S,12S,13S,E)-12-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-1-iodo-4,10-dimethoxy-5,9,11,13-tetramethylpentadeca-1,14-dien-6-one (18)
To a solution of Dess–Martin periodinane (44 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was added alcohol 17 (46 mg, 0.078 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL). Once the reaction was complete (TLC monitoring), Et2O (5 mL), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2 mL) and Na2S2O3 (0.5 mL) were added. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated to give crude product ketone (42 mg). This crude product was used directly in the next step without purification.
To a solution of Stryker’s copper hydride reagent ([PPh3CuH]6; 78mg, 0.04 mmol) in 2 mL of degassed toluene was added the above enone as a solution in toluene (1 mL, degassed) and 1 drop of water via syringe. The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature, then was diluted with 20 mL of CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution, brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (9:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the ketone 18 (28 mg, 60% over two steps) as a colorless oil: [α]D= −30.7° (c=1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.56 (ddd, J = 14.7, 8.4, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (dt, J = 14.5, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 5.92 – 5.79 (m, 1H), 5.06 – 4.96 (m, 2H), 3.84 (dd, J = 4.5, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 3.45 – 3.41 (m, 4H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 2.88 (dd, J = 8.3, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.76 – 2.67 (m, 1H), 2.55 (ddd, J = 17.5, 9.2, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 2.49 – 2.37 (m, 2H), 2.34 – 2.26 (m, 1H), 2.19 – 2.08 (m, 1H), 1.83 – 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.65 (ddd, J = 13.5, 6.8, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 1.44 – 1.33 (m, 1H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 0.81 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.09 (s, 2H), 0.08 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 213.6, 141.8, 141.7, 114.3, 88.8, 81.5, 77.1, 75.0, 60.9, 57.9, 49.1, 45.0, 41.6, 38.9, 36.4, 34.5, 26.3, 24.2, 18.7, 17.7, 16.7, 12.8, 12.3, −3.4, −3.5. IR (neat) 2959, 2931, 1716, 1462, 1253, 1095 cm−1; HRMS m/z for C27H51O4SiIH [M+H]+ calcd 595.2680 found 595.2678.
N-((4R,5R,9S,10S,11S,12S,13S,E)-12-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-4,10-dimethoxy-5,9,11,13-tetramethyl-6-oxopentadeca-1,14-dien-1-yl)-N-methylformamide (2)
N-Methyl formamide (0.1 mL), Cs2CO3 (26 mg, 0.08 mmol), CuTC (9 mg, 0.045 mmol), and 1,10-phenanthroline (16 mg, 0.09 mmol) were placed in a flame-dried 10 mL Schlenk tube with a stir bar. Vinyl iodide 18 (27 mg, 0.045mmol) in 1 mL of anhydrous DMA was added and the system was degassed under vacuum until gas evolution ceased. The mixture was heated to 45°C for 18 h. The reaction mixture was then diluted with Et2O and pH 7 buffer. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic layers was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (1:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the product 2 (12 mg, 50%, 75% based on recovered starting material) as a colorless oil. The product contains two amide rotamers at room temperature, and was a 12:1 mixture of epimers at C(32): [α]D= −25.1° (c=0.75, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.28 – 8.06 (1H, 8.28 (s, 0.7H), 8.06 (s, 0.3H)), 7.18 – 6.51 (1H, 7.18 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 0.3H), 6.51 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 0.7H)), 5.94 – 5.76 (m, 1H), 5.17 – 4.95 (m, 3H), 3.84 (dd, J = 4.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.49 – 3.39 (m, 4H), 3.29 – 3.28 (3H, 3.29 (s, 2H), 3.28 (s, 1H)), 3.06 – 3.03 (3H, 3.06 (s, 1H), 3.03 (s, 2H)), 2.88 (dd, J = 8.3, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 2.78 – 2.67 (m, 1H), 2.60 – 2.39 (m, 3H), 2.35 – 2.25 (m, 1H), 2.22 – 2.08 (m, 1H), 1.83 – 1.70 (m, 2H), 1.70 – 1.62 (m, 1H), 1.37 (m, 1H), 0.98 (m, 9H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 0.81 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 213.8, 162.3(160.9), 141.8, 130.5(126.5), 114.3, 105.7(107.3), 88.8, 82.5, 75.0, 60.9, 57.9(57.7), 49.0(49.2), 45.0, 41.5(41.3), 38.9, 34.5, 30.6(30.5), 27.7(33.2), 26.3, 24.2, 18.7, 17.8(17.7), 16.7, 12.8(13.0), 12.3, −3.4, −3.5. IR (neat) 2958, 2930, 1696, 1659, 1462, 1252, 1078 cm−1; HRMS m/z for C29H55O5SiH [M+H]+ calcd 526.3928 found 526.3925.
N-((1E,4R,5S,7E,9S,10S,11S,12S,13S)-12-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-6-hydroxy-4,10-dimethoxy-5,9,11,13-tetramethylpentadeca-1,7,14-trien-1-yl)-N-methylformamide (19)
N-Methyl formamide (0.2 mL), Cs2CO3 (49 mg, 0.15 mmol), CuTC (19 mg, 0.1 mmol), 1,10-phenanthroline (36 mg, 0.2 mmol) were placed in a flame-dried 10 mL Schlenk tube with a stir bar. A solution of vinyl iodide 17 (58 mg, 0.098 mmol) in 1 mL of anhydrous DMA was added and the system was degassed under vacuum until gas evolution ceased. The mixture was heated to 45°C for 18 h. The reaction was then diluted with Et2O and pH 7 buffer. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (1:4 hexanes-EtOAc) provided the product 19 (37 mg, 72%) as a colorless oil. This compound contains two isomers (alcohol epimers, deriving from 17) and there are two rotamers for each isomer. The product was used directly in the next step. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.33 – 8.01 (1H), 7.21 – 6.45 (1H), 5.90 – 5.59 (2H), 5.50 – 5.32 (1H), 5.19 – 4.91 (3H), 4.29 (s, 1H), 3.86 (1H), 3.49 – 3.44 (3H), 3.41 – 3.37 (3H), 3.31 – 3.22 (1H), 3.07 – 3.00 (3H), 3.00 – 2.81 (2H), 2.55 – 2.39 (2H), 2.33 – 2.17 (2H), 1.88 – 1.78 (1H), 1.73 – 1.65 (1H), 1.12 (3H), 1.02 – 0.95 (3H), 0.93 – 0.88 (9H), 0.88 – 0.81 (3H), 0.80 – 0.74 (3H), 0.10 – 0.04 (6H).
N-((4R,5R,9S,10S,11S,12S,13S,E)-12-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-4,10-dimethoxy-5,9,11,13-tetramethyl-6-oxopentadeca-1,14-dien-1-yl)-N-methylformamide (2)
To a solution of Dess–Martin periodinane (44 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was added alcohol 19 (37 mg, 0.07 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL). Once the reaction was complete (TLC monitoring), Et2O (5 mL), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2 mL) and Na2S2O3 (0.5 mL) were added. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated to give crude product ketone (36 mg) that was used directly in the next step without purification.
To a solution of Stryker’s copper hydride reagent ([PPh3CuH]6; 69 mg, 0.035 mmol) in 2 mL of degassed toluene was added a solution of the above ketone in toluene (1 mL, degassed) and 1 drop of water via syringe. This mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature, then was diluted with 20 mL of CH2Cl2. The organic layer was washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution, and brine, then dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Purification of the crude product by column chromatography (1:1 hexanes-EtOAc) provided product 2 (18 mg, 50% over 2 steps) as a colorless oil. This material was showed no evidence of C(32) epimerization, but was a mixture of formamide rotamers. Otherwise, the spectroscopic properties of this material was the same as described above.
Figure 1.
Structures of selected members of the reidispongiolide-sphinxolide natural products
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of Vinyl Iodide 4 and Elaboration to Aldehyde 16
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Institutes of Health (GM038436) for support of this research. We also thank Mr. Ming Chen for his contributions to the early stages of this project, specifically his pioneering studies of the mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration reaction leading to 12.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Guella G, Mancini I, Chiasera G, Pietra F. Helv Chim Acta. 1989;72:237–246. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dauria MV, Paloma LG, Minale L, Zampella A, Verbist JF, Roussakis C, Debitus C. Tetrahedron. 1993;49:8657–8664. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dauria MV, Paloma LG, Minale L, Zampella A, Verbist JF, Roussakis C, Debitus C, Patissou J. Tetrahedron. 1994;50:4829–4834. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carbonelli S, Zampella A, Randazzo A, Debitus C, Gomez-Paloma L. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:14665–14674. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang XQ, Minale L, Zampella A, Smith CD. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3751–3758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bassarello C, Bifulco G, Zampella A, D’Auria MV, Riccio R, Gomez-Paloma L. Eur J Org Chem. 2001:39–44. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zampella A, Bassarello C, Bifulco G, Gomez-Paloma L, D’Auria MV. Eur J Org Chem. 2002:785–790. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zampella A, Sepe V, D’Orsi R, Bifulco G, Bassarello C, D’Auria MV. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2003;14:1787–1798. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paterson I, Britton R, Ashton K, Knust H, Stafford J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:11986–11991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401548101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Allingham JS, Zampella A, D’Auria MV, Rayment I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:14527–14532. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502089102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Paterson I, Ashton K, Britton R, Knust H. Org Lett. 2003;5:1963–1966. doi: 10.1021/ol034558y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Paterson I, Ashton K, Britton R, Cecere G, Chouraqui G, Florence GJ, Stafford J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:6167–6171. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Akiyama S, Toriihara E, Suzuki K, Teruya T, Suenaga K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:5012–5014. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Perrins RD, Cecere G, Paterson I, Marriott G. Chem Biol. 2008;15:287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tanaka J, Craig Blain J, Allingham JS. Chem Biol. 2008;15:205–207. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Hoffmann RW. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1987;26:489. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hoffmann RW, Dahmann G, Andersen MW. Synthesis. 1994:629. [Google Scholar]; (c) Chemler SR, Roush WR. J Org Chem. 1998;63:3800. doi: 10.1021/jo0267908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chemler SR, Roush WR. J Org Chem. 2003;83:1319. doi: 10.1021/jo0267908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:5744–5747. doi: 10.1021/ja2010187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133 doi: 10.1021/ja2010187. submitted for publication. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen M, Ess DH, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:7881–7883. doi: 10.1021/ja103041u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smith AB, Beauchamp TJ, LaMarche MJ, Kaufman MD, Qiu Y, Arimoto H, Jones DR, Kobayashi K. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:8654–8664. [Google Scholar]
- 21.(a) Omura K, Swern D. Tetrahedron. 1978;34:1651–1660. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tidwell TT. Org React. 1990;39:297. [Google Scholar]
- 22.(a) Roush WR, Halterman RL. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:294–296. [Google Scholar]; (b) Roush WR, Ando K, Powers DB, Palkowitz AD, Halterman RL. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:6339–6348. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jung WH, Harrison C, Shin Y, Fournier JH, Balachandran R, Raccor BS, Sikorski RP, Vogt A, Curran DP, Day BW. J Med Chem. 2007;50:2951–2966. doi: 10.1021/jm061385k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Horita K, Yoshioka T, Tanaka T, Oikawa Y, Yonemitsu O. Tetrahedron. 1986;42:3021–3028. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Evans DA, Hoveyda AH. J Org Chem. 1990;55:5190–5192. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dess DB, Martin JC. J Org Chem. 1983;48:4155–4156. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mahoney WS, Brestensky DM, Stryker JM. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:291–293. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shen R, Lin CT, Bowman EJ, Bowman BJ, Porco JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:7889–7901. doi: 10.1021/ja0352350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shen R, Porco JA. Org Lett. 2000;2:1333–1336. doi: 10.1021/ol005800t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Han C, Shen R, Su S, Porco JA. Org Lett. 2003;6:27–30. doi: 10.1021/ol0360041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shen R, Lin CT, Porco JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:5650–5651. doi: 10.1021/ja026025a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Minguez JM, Kim SY, Giuliano KA, Balachandran R, Madiraju C, Day BW, Curran DP. Bioorg Med Chem. 2003;11:3335–3357. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(03)00186-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





