Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2012 Mar 26;159(1):47–51. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.196105

The Pitfalls of Transgenic Selection and New Roles of AtHXK1: A High Level of AtHXK1 Expression Uncouples Hexokinase1-Dependent Sugar Signaling from Exogenous Sugar1,[W]

Gilor Kelly 1, Rakefet David-Schwartz 1, Nir Sade 1, Menachem Moshelion 1, Asher Levi 1, Victor Alchanatis 1, David Granot 1,*
PMCID: PMC3375979  PMID: 22451715

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) hexokinase (AtHXK1) encodes a dual-function enzyme that mediates sugar sensing in addition to its involvement in hexose phosphorylation activity, thereby coordinating sugar availability with plant physiology and development (Moore et al., 2003; Rolland et al., 2006). Sugars such as Glc are essential metabolic nutrients and structural components and are important regulatory molecules that control gene expression, metabolism, physiology, the cell cycle, and development in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Hexokinase (HXK), which catalyzes the essential step of Glc phosphorylation, is an evolutionarily conserved Glc sensor (Wilson, 2003; Rolland et al., 2006; Karve et al., 2010). Most studies of HXK in plants have involved AtHXK1. The AtHXK1 loss-of-function mutant glucose-insensitive2 (gin2) was isolated through a mutant screen based on a high-Glc (6%) repression assay, in which wild-type plants display inhibited cotyledon expansion, chlorophyll accumulation, and shoot growth at the early stage of seedling development (Moore et al., 2003). gin2 mutants are insensitive to Glc, whereas overexpression of AtHXK1 accelerates the inhibition of cotyledon expansion, chlorophyll accumulation, and seedling development and reduces the expression of photosynthetic genes (Jang et al., 1997; Xiao et al., 2000). These effects have been observed only in the presence of 3% to 6% Glc, limiting the experiments to sterile synthetic medium, usually agar supplemented with one-half-strength Murashige and Skoog (1/2MS) nutrient additive (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) and 3% to 6% Glc. As a consequence, these experiments (Jang et al., 1997; Xiao et al., 2000) have mostly been limited to germinating seeds and seedlings.

The use of a high concentration of Glc has raised concerns about the physiological relevance of these assays (León and Sheen, 2003; Rook and Bevan, 2003). For this reason, Cho et al. (2010) eliminated nitrate from the medium in order to minimize the nonphysiological conditions imposed by a high concentration of Glc. Because Glc responses are antagonized by nitrate (Stitt, 1999; Stitt and Krapp, 1999; Moore et al., 2003), growing the plants on medium without nitrate (without Murashige and Skoog additive) allowed the Glc concentration to be reduced to 2% while still obtaining AtHXK1-dependent sugar signaling effects (Cho et al., 2010). However, the experiments were still limited to sterile medium and the early seedling developmental stages.

Unlike Arabidopsis, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants that overexpress AtHXK1 exhibit inhibited growth, reduced photosynthesis, and accelerated leaf senescence when grown in soil under regular growth conditions in the absence of exogenous Glc (Dai et al., 1999). Accordingly, studies with tomato plants that overexpress AtHXK1 have not been limited to the early developmental stages but have involved mature plants and both vegetative and reproductive tissues, including young and mature fruits (Dai et al., 1999; Menu et al., 2003; Roessner-Tunali et al., 2003; Moing et al., 2004).

Studies have also been conducted using potato (Solanum tuberosum) and rice (Oryza sativa) plants that overexpress HXK. Overexpression of StHK1, the potato homolog of AtHXK1, had no effect on the development of potato plants (Veramendi et al., 1999, 2002). Similarly, overexpression of the rice homologs OsHXK5 and OsHXK6 had no effect on the growth or photosynthetic gene expression of rice plants, except when they were grown on Glc (Cho et al., 2009). It seems that tomato is the only plant species tested so far in which a high level of AtHXK1 expression causes developmental, physiological, and molecular sugar-sensing effects in the absence of exogenous sugar (Dai et al., 1999).

We hypothesized that due to the inhibition effects of AtHXK1, transgenic plants were discriminated against high expression levels of AtHXK1 throughout the selection procedure, in favor of plants with low expression levels. To test this hypothesis, we retransformed Arabidopsis (Columbia ecotype) with AtHXK1 under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and searched for kanamycin-resistant individuals that exhibit poor growth on selective medium. Out of 50 resistant T1 plants, we isolated 16 plants that exhibited growth retardation in soil. Independent homozygous T2 lines were then identified, and the AtHXK1 effects of three lines were characterized. These lines exhibited growth inhibition and accelerated leaf senescence in soil under normal growing conditions (Fig. 1A). The AtHXK1 expression levels of these lines were about 12 times higher than those observed in wild-type plants (Fig. 2A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Overexpression of AtHXK1 inhibits growth and accelerates leaf senescence under normal growth conditions. A, Plants grown in soil under regular growth conditions in the absence of any exogenous sugar. B, Plants grown on 1/2MS agar medium without sugar. Two independent transgenic lines are shown. WT, Wild type.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Gene expression analysis and thermal imaging of wild-type (WT) and 35S::HXK plants. A, Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using RNA extracted from young nonsenescing leaves of the wild type and two independent transgenic lines (n = 5 each) grown in soil. The genes assayed were HXK1, CAB1, PC, CAA, SBPase, RAB18, and ABI5. TUB2 (β-tubulin) was used for normalization. Experiments were repeated twice with similar results. Data are means ± se; asterisks denote significant differences relative to the wild type (t test; P < 0.01). B, AtHXK1 increases leaf temperature. Images of plants growing in soil under normal conditions were captured using a thermal camera (ThermaCAM model SC655; FLIR Systems); warm colors represent high temperatures (scale is shown at right). C, Leaf temperatures of the wild type and three independent transgenic lines were determined using ThermaCAM researcher pro 2.10 software. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results. Data are means ± se from five biological repeats per line; four leaves were analyzed per plant. The asterisk denotes a significant difference relative to the wild type (t test; P < 0.01).

The new 35S::HXK transgenic plants were also tested on 1/2MS agar medium without sugar. Although nitrate antagonizes Glc and AtHXK1 responses (Stitt, 1999; Stitt and Krapp, 1999; Moore et al., 2003; Cho et al., 2010), inhibition of both shoot and root growth was clearly visible on 1/2MS medium (Fig. 1B). In comparison with wild-type leaves, 35S::HXK leaves were smaller and rounded (Figs. 1B and 2B). The roots of the 35S::HXK plants were shorter, with only secondary lateral roots, whereas wild-type plants developed secondary and tertiary lateral roots (Fig. 1B). Hence, in both soil and synthetic medium, the effects of AtHXK1 are clearly evident in the presence of nitrate and are independent of exogenous Glc.

To further explore the AtHXK1 effects in the transgenic lines, we analyzed chlorophyll accumulation and the expression of genes related to photosynthesis. The chlorophyll content of the AtHXK1 transgenic lines was significantly reduced (Table I). The expression levels of the photosynthesis-related genes CAB1 (for chlorophyll a/b-binding protein), PC (for plastocyanin), CAA (for carbonic anhydrase), and SBPase (for sedoheptulose-bisphosphatase) were significantly reduced as compared with the levels observed in the control plants. In contrast, the expression levels of RAB18, an abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive gene, and ABI5, an ABA-induced transcription factor (Lång and Palva, 1992; Lopez-Molina et al., 2001; Brocard et al., 2002), were higher in the transgenic plants. These results are in agreement with previous observations that the effects of AtHXK1 on seedling development and photosynthetic gene expression in response to exogenous Glc are dependent on ABA (Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000; Huijser et al., 2000; Laby et al., 2000; Cheng et al., 2002; Rook and Bevan, 2003). However, these results are in contrast to the observation that 2% Glc, in the absence of nitrate, represses cotyledon greening independent of ABA2/GIN1 (an ABA biosynthesis gene; Cho et al., 2010). This difference might reflect the different experimental conditions and plant developmental stages observed in the different experiments.

Table I. Chlorophyll and photosynthesis measurements.

The chlorophyll contents of mature nonsenescing leaves from wild-type plants and three independent transgenic lines (n = 10) were measured using the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter (Minolta). Two independent experiments were conducted with similar results. Stomatal conductance (gs), net photosynthesis (AN), substomatal CO2 concentrations (Ci), and transpiration (Tr) were assayed in wild-type plants and in two independent transgenic lines using a Li-6400 portable gas-exchange system (LI-COR), as described (Flexas et al., 2007). Data are means ± se from five biological repeats. Asterisks denote significant differences relative to the wild type (t test; P < 0.01).

Parameter Wild Type 35S::HXK
Chlorophyll content (SPAD units) 28.39 ± 1.13 25.16 ± 0.33*
gs (mol water m−2 s−1) 0.142 ± 0.009 0.069 ± 0.003*
AN (μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) 7.041 ± 0.386 3.635 ± 0.389*
Ci (μmol CO2 mol−1) 300.00 ± 3.352 300.17 ± 8.553
Tr (mmol water m−2 s−1) 2.201 ± 0.121 1.177 ± 0.051*

Photosynthesis measurement data had never been collected for Arabidopsis seedlings grown on Glc. In our study, however, the plants grown in soil were easily amenable to measurements of photosynthetic activity. Although there was no change in intercellular CO2 concentration in the transgenic plants, the net photosynthesis rate was diminished by half (Table I). Interestingly, stomatal conductivity and the transpiration rate were also reduced by half (Table I), indicating smaller stomatal apertures. Closed stomata and reduced transpiration increase leaf temperature (Merlot et al., 2002). Using infrared thermal imaging, we demonstrated that the leaf temperature of AtHXK1-expressing lines grown in soil was higher than that of the wild type (Fig. 2, B and C). These results indicate that AtHXK1 not only inhibits photosynthesis but also induces stomatal closure and reduction in transpiration, affecting whole-plant water balance as a consequence.

A main advantage of the new AtHXK1-expressing plants is the fact that we can examine their phenotype at advanced developmental stages. We noticed that AtHXK1-expressing plants lost apical dominance, allowing the emergence of lateral buds (Supplemental Fig. S1). This effect was not evident in the tomato lines expressing AtHXK1 (Dai et al., 1999), possibly because the tomato line used in that experiment (line MP1) generally exhibits a low level of apical dominance and persistent emergence of lateral buds. Because auxin is involved in apical dominance (Müller and Leyser, 2011), we analyzed the expression of the auxin-responsive genes TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1 (TIR1; an auxin receptor), PIN-FORMED1 (PIN1; an auxin transporter), and INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID INDUCIBLE5 (IAA5; an auxin-induced gene) in the 35S::HXK Arabidopsis plants. The expression levels of these genes were lower in the transgenic plants than in the control plants (Fig. 3), suggesting lower levels of auxin signaling, which may explain the loss of apical dominance. These effects of AtHXK1 on auxin-related genes differ from previously published results showing that an auxin response is essential for AtHXK1-mediated sugar inhibition of seedling growth on 6% Glc (Moore et al., 2003). They are also in contrast to results showing increased expression of PIN1 in whole seedlings kept in the dark and exposed to 3% Glc for 3 h (Mishra et al., 2009). However, the observed effects are in line with the observation of reduced expression of TIR1 in response to the same Glc treatment (Mishra et al., 2009). Hence, it appears that Glc and AtHXK1 interact with auxin in a complicated manner that depends on growth conditions, the tissue examined, and the developmental stage of the plant. We believe that plants overexpressing AtHXK1 under normal growth conditions might be a good system in which to dissect the interaction between AtHXK1 and auxin in different tissues and at different developmental stages.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

AtHXK1 suppresses auxin-response genes. Relative expression levels of TIR1, IAA5, and PIN1 were assayed as described in Figure 2A. Data are means ± se; asterisks denote significant differences relative to the wild type (WT; t test; P < 0.01).

Transformation of Arabidopsis, as well as other plants, involves the selection of viable seedlings grown on medium containing kanamycin or another selective agent. It is very likely that the most resistant viable seedlings are selected first. However, high levels of AtHXK1 expression have a counter growth inhibition effect, making us suspect that such transformants were most likely ignored. Being aware of this effect, we also selected poorly growing kanamycin-resistant transformants, which appear to be those with high levels of AtHXK1 expression. Such a bias in the selection of transgenic plants may be present in many other cases, as we previously observed in an investigation of antisense suppression of LeFRK2 (German et al., 2003). Therefore, care should be taken to avoid discrimination against the most interesting transformants. The development of both tomato and Arabidopsis plants with clear AtHXK1 signaling effects that are manifested under normal growth conditions suggests that it might be possible to obtain similar potato and rice plants (Veramendi et al., 1999, 2002; Cho et al., 2009).

The advantage of analyzing plants under normal growth conditions is obvious. First, the use of natural physiological conditions allows for discoveries with greater biological relevance. Second, the effects of interest can be studied at all developmental stages and in all plant parts and tissues. In our case, we discovered that AtHXK1 mediates stomatal closure, either directly via guard cells or indirectly through the effect of AtHXK1 on photosynthesis (Mott, 2009). Nonetheless, the interesting physiological consequence of this is reduced transpiration accompanied by increased leaf temperatures, suggesting that AtHXK1 might have a global effect on whole-plant water balance. Lastly, a new relationship between AtHXK1, shoot apical dominance, and auxin response has been observed. In light of these observations, we believe that these new transgenic lines will help us to broaden our understanding of the relationship between AtHXK1, sugar signaling, and plant physiology and development under regular physiological conditions.

Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries as described in Table S1.

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Glossary

HXK

hexokinase

1/2MS

one-half-strength Murashige and Skoog

ABA

abscisic acid

References

  1. Arenas-Huertero F, Arroyo A, Zhou L, Sheen J, León P. (2000) Analysis of Arabidopsis glucose insensitive mutants, gin5 and gin6, reveals a central role of the plant hormone ABA in the regulation of plant vegetative development by sugar. Genes Dev 14: 2085–2096 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brocard IM, Lynch TJ, Finkelstein RR. (2002) Regulation and role of the Arabidopsis abscisic acid-insensitive 5 gene in abscisic acid, sugar, and stress response. Plant Physiol 129: 1533–1543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng WH, Endo A, Zhou L, Penney J, Chen HC, Arroyo A, Leon P, Nambara E, Asami T, Seo M, et al. (2002) A unique short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase in Arabidopsis glucose signaling and abscisic acid biosynthesis and functions. Plant Cell 14: 2723–2743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cho JI, Ryoo N, Eom JS, Lee DW, Kim HB, Jeong SW, Lee YH, Kwon YK, Cho MH, Bhoo SH, et al. (2009) Role of the rice hexokinases OsHXK5 and OsHXK6 as glucose sensors. Plant Physiol 149: 745–759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cho YH, Sheen J, Yoo SD. (2010) Low glucose uncouples hexokinase1-dependent sugar signaling from stress and defense hormone abscisic acid and C2H4 responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 152: 1180–1182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dai N, Schaffer A, Petreikov M, Shahak Y, Giller Y, Ratner K, Levine A, Granot D. (1999) Overexpression of Arabidopsis hexokinase in tomato plants inhibits growth, reduces photosynthesis, and induces rapid senescence. Plant Cell 11: 1253–1266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Flexas J, Ortuño MF, Ribas-Carbo M, Diaz-Espejo A, Flórez-Sarasa ID, Medrano H. (2007) Mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 175: 501–511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. German MA, Dai N, Matsevitz T, Hanael R, Petreikov M, Bernstein N, Ioffe M, Shahak Y, Schaffer AA, Granot D. (2003) Suppression of fructokinase encoded by LeFRK2 in tomato stem inhibits growth and causes wilting of young leaves. Plant J 34: 837–846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huijser C, Kortstee A, Pego J, Weisbeek P, Wisman E, Smeekens S. (2000) The Arabidopsis SUCROSE UNCOUPLED-6 gene is identical to ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE-4: involvement of abscisic acid in sugar responses. Plant J 23: 577–585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jang JC, León P, Zhou L, Sheen J. (1997) Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. Plant Cell 9: 5–19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karve R, Lauria M, Virnig A, Xia X, Rauh BL, Moore BD. (2010) Evolutionary lineages and functional diversification of plant hexokinases. Mol Plant 3: 334–346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Laby RJ, Kincaid MS, Kim D, Gibson SI. (2000) The Arabidopsis sugar-insensitive mutants sis4 and sis5 are defective in abscisic acid synthesis and response. Plant J 23: 587–596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lång V, Palva ET. (1992) The expression of a rab-related gene, rab18, is induced by abscisic acid during the cold acclimation process of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Mol Biol 20: 951–962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. León P, Sheen J. (2003) Sugar and hormone connections. Trends Plant Sci 8: 110–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lopez-Molina L, Mongrand S, Chua NH. (2001) A postgermination developmental arrest checkpoint is mediated by abscisic acid and requires the ABI5 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 4782–4787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Menu T, Saglio P, Granot D, Dai N, Raymond P, Ricard B. (2003) High hexokinase activity in tomato fruit perturbs carbon and energy metabolism and reduces fruit and seed size. Plant Cell Environ 27: 89–98 [Google Scholar]
  17. Merlot S, Mustilli AC, Genty B, North H, Lefebvre V, Sotta B, Vavasseur A, Giraudat J. (2002) Use of infrared thermal imaging to isolate Arabidopsis mutants defective in stomatal regulation. Plant J 30: 601–609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mishra BS, Singh M, Aggrawal P, Laxmi A. (2009) Glucose and auxin signaling interaction in controlling Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings root growth and development. PLoS ONE 4: e4502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moing A, Maucourt M, Renaud C, Gaudillere M, Brouquisse R, Lebouteiller B, Gousset-Dupont A, Vidal J, Granot D, Denoyes-Rothan B, et al. (2004) Quantitative metabolic profiling by 1-dimensional H-1-NMR analyses: application to plant genetics and functional genomics. Funct Plant Biol 31: 889–902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moore B, Zhou L, Rolland F, Hall Q, Cheng WH, Liu YX, Hwang I, Jones T, Sheen J. (2003) Role of the Arabidopsis glucose sensor HXK1 in nutrient, light, and hormonal signaling. Science 300: 332–336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mott KA. (2009) Opinion: stomatal responses to light and CO(2) depend on the mesophyll. Plant Cell Environ 32: 1479–1486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Müller D, Leyser O. (2011) Auxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching. Ann Bot (Lond) 107: 1203–1212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Murashige T, Skoog F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol 15: 473–496 [Google Scholar]
  24. Roessner-Tunali U, Hegemann B, Lytovchenko A, Carrari F, Bruedigam C, Granot D, Fernie AR. (2003) Metabolic profiling of transgenic tomato plants overexpressing hexokinase reveals that the influence of hexose phosphorylation diminishes during fruit development. Plant Physiol 133: 84–99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rolland F, Baena-Gonzalez E, Sheen J. (2006) Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 675–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rook F, Bevan MW. (2003) Genetic approaches to understanding sugar-response pathways. J Exp Bot 54: 495–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stitt M. (1999) Nitrate regulation of metabolism and growth. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2: 178–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stitt M, Krapp A. (1999) The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: the physiological and molecular background. Plant Cell Environ 22: 553–621 [Google Scholar]
  29. Veramendi J, Fernie AR, Leisse A, Willmitzer L, Trethewey RN. (2002) Potato hexokinase 2 complements transgenic Arabidopsis plants deficient in hexokinase 1 but does not play a key role in tuber carbohydrate metabolism. Plant Mol Biol 49: 491–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Veramendi J, Roessner U, Renz A, Willmitzer L, Trethewey RN. (1999) Antisense repression of hexokinase 1 leads to an overaccumulation of starch in leaves of transgenic potato plants but not to significant changes in tuber carbohydrate metabolism. Plant Physiol 121: 123–134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilson JE. (2003) Isozymes of mammalian hexokinase: structure, subcellular localization and metabolic function. J Exp Biol 206: 2049–2057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xiao W, Sheen J, Jang JC. (2000) The role of hexokinase in plant sugar signal transduction and growth and development. Plant Mol Biol 44: 451–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES