Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2012 Jun 18;7(6):e38582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038582

Resource Quantity Affects Benthic Microbial Community Structure and Growth Efficiency in a Temperate Intertidal Mudflat

Daniel J Mayor 1,*, Barry Thornton 2, Alain F Zuur 3
Editor: Jack Anthony Gilbert4
PMCID: PMC3377660  PMID: 22723867

Abstract

Estuaries cover <1% of marine habitats, but the carbon dioxide (CO2) effluxes from these net heterotrophic systems contribute significantly to the global carbon cycle. Anthropogenic eutrophication of estuarine waterways increases the supply of labile substrates to the underlying sediments. How such changes affect the form and functioning of the resident microbial communities remains unclear. We employed a carbon-13 pulse-chase experiment to investigate how a temperate estuarine benthic microbial community at 6.5°C responded to additions of marine diatom-derived organic carbon equivalent to 4.16, 41.60 and 416.00 mmol C m−2. The quantities of carbon mineralized and incorporated into bacterial biomass both increased significantly, albeit differentially, with resource supply. This resulted in bacterial growth efficiency increasing from 0.40±0.02 to 0.55±0.04 as substrates became more available. The proportions of diatom-derived carbon incorporated into individual microbial membrane fatty acids also varied with resource supply. Future increases in labile organic substrate supply have the potential to increase both the proportion of organic carbon being retained within the benthic compartment of estuaries and also the absolute quantity of CO2 outgassing from these environments.

Introduction

Estuaries are net heterotrophic systems [1], [2] and represent a significant source of CO2 to the atmosphere: Regional-scale estimates suggest that European estuaries represent 5–10% of Western Europe’s anthropogenic CO2 emissions [3]. The exact contribution of estuaries to the global atmospheric CO2 emissions remains contentious, but estimates range between 0.25–0.45 Pg C y−1 [2], [4]. Bacteria play a pivotal role in the mineralization of organic matter along estuaries, with CO2 emissions from these ecosystems originating principally from bacterial respiration [2], [5]. They are also fundamental for mediating changes in the nitrogen cycle [6], and thereby influence the availability of key nutrients for primary producers. It follows that understanding the processes controlling microbial mineralization in estuarine waterways is a prerequisite for predicting the future role of this habitat in global elemental cycles and thus climate regulation. Estuarine sediments can efficiently bury organic matter, sequestering both carbon and nitrogen from the atmosphere [1], [7], [8]. A deeper appreciation of estuarine biogeochemistry is therefore also required if we are to forecast how the production and storage of organic matter in coastal ecosystems will be affected by further anthropogenic change.

Agricultural practices and human wastewaters both contribute significantly to the eutrophication of rivers and coastal systems [9], [10], resulting in a greater supply of labile organic substrates to the seabed. Work conducted on bacterioplankton communities has demonstrated that the rates and efficiencies with which they grow are both positively related to substrate availability [11][13]. A positive relationship between benthic estuarine mineralization rates and carbon input also exists when multiple locations are considered [1]. Far less is known about how increased organic matter supply affects benthic microbial community structure and function within a single estuary. Indeed, estimates of estuarine benthic bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) and the factors controlling it are scarce [14]. We used a carbon-13 (13C) tracer study to explore the hypothesis that substrate quantity affects the composition and short-term metabolic response of the benthic bacterial community in a temperate estuary. Increasing quantities of 13C-labelled diatoms were added to hand-collected sediment cores, allowing us to quantify the amounts of diatom-derived carbon that were mineralized and incorporated into benthic bacterial biomass during the experiment. Our results demonstrate that carbon mineralization, bacterial biomass production and BGE are all coupled to the supply of labile substrates, illustrating that resource quantity plays a key role in controlling the short-term fate of organic matter in temperate estuarine sediments.

Materials and Methods

Study Site and Sediment Collection

The experiment was conducted on natural whole-sediment communities retrieved from the tidal mudflats in the lower reach of the Ythan Estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland, UK (57°20.085′N, 02°0.206′W). All necessary permissions for work on the Ythan and Forvie National Nature Reserve were obtained from Scottish Natural Heritage. The sediments at the experimental location have a mean particle diameter of 50 µm [15] and contained 1.5% organic carbon by dry weight in the upper 1 cm. A total of 12 Perspex cores (10 cm ID×600 mm length) were inserted 12 cm into the sediments by hand at low tide and the resulting material retrieved. All sediment cores were transferred to a temperature controlled laboratory, set at the in situ temperature of 6.5°C, within 30 minutes of collection. Each core subsequently received 3.8 L of UV-sterilized, 10 µm filtered seawater previously collected from the estuary at high tide (∼33 psu).

Experimental Setup

The experiment consisted of four treatments, with three replicates of each: Control (no substrate addition), low-, medium-, and high-quantity of organic material. Sediments in the latter three treatments received the equivalent of 4.16, 41.60 and 416.00 mmol organic carbon m−2 respectively in the form of a 13C-labelled marine diatom, Chaetoceros radicans (49.4±0.3 atom % 13C). These quantities of carbon were chosen to fall below and above 11.42 mmol organic carbon m−2, the mean daily amount of phytoplankton estimated to be deposited on Ythan sediments [16]; the three levels of organic enrichment are representative of the mean daily quantities of carbon received by oligotrophic, mesotrophic and hypertrophic estuaries respectively [17]. The use of 13C-labelled C. radicans enabled us to trace the fate of the constituent carbon into dissolved inorganic carbon (DI13C) and bacterial biomass in a quantitative manner. Specific details of algal culture techniques and biochemistry of the C. radicans are presented elsewhere [18]. Immediately prior to experimentation, the algal substrates were suspended in 10 ml of seawater and gently pipetted directly onto the sediment surface to ensure homogenous distribution. All cores were subsequently sealed with lids to prevent gas exchange and incubated in darkness. Water samples from each core, collected via lid ports immediately after the introduction of substrates (t = 0) and every 4 hours thereafter, were analysed for concentrations of dissolved oxygen, DIC and DI13C, ammonium-nitrogen (NH4-N) and total oxidised nitrogen (TOx-N; NO2+NO3). Core lids were gently depressed into the cores as the water samples were drawn to avoid the production of a head space. Stirrer-bars that passed through the lids via an o-ring seal were rotated immediately prior to each sampling interval without disturbing the sediment surface to ensure that the water was well homogenized. Sediments were extruded at the end of the experiment and the upper 1 cm was retained and stored at −80°C for subsequent quantification of diatom carbon uptake into bacterial biomass.

Sample Processing

Samples for determination of oxygen concentrations were transferred into 10 ml Winkler bottles, fixed and subsequently analysed using an automated Winkler titration system (785 DMP Titrino, Metrohm U.K.). Concentrations of NH4-N and TOx-N were determined using an automated segmented flow analyser (Bran & Leubbe QuAAtro SFA, SEAL Analytical Ltd., U.K.). Aliquots of water for the analysis of DIC and DI13C were sterile filtered (0.2 µm) into Exetainers (Labco, U.K.), poisoned with 0.2% (vol) mercuric chloride and stored at 4°C until analysis. DIC samples were quantitatively converted to carbon dioxide before the concentrations and carbon isotope ratios were determined using a Gas-bench II connected to a DeltaPlus Advantage isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS; both Thermo Finnigan, Germany) [19]. The mean amplitude of five replicate sample peaks was used to calculate DIC concentration from a calibration curve derived from an appropriate range of sodium carbonate standard solutions.

Purified phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) extracted from freeze-dried sediment samples [20], [21] were derivitized to yield fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). The concentrations and carbon isotope ratios of individual FAMEs were measured using a GC Trace Ultra with combustion column attached via a GC Combustion III to a Delta V Advantage IRMS (all Thermo Finnigan, Germany). Individual PLFAs were quantified by combining the area of their mass peaks, m/z = 44, 45 & 46, after background subtraction, and comparison with a known internal standard (19:0) added to each sample [22]. Bacterial carbon uptake was calculated from label incorporation into the bacterial biomarker PLFAs i15:0, ai15:0 and i16:0 [23], assuming these represent 10% of total bacterial PLFAs and 0.056 gC PLFA/gC biomass [24]. All calculations relating to the uptake of 13C were made using well-established equations [23]. Data are expressed as the total uptake and mineralization of added diatom-derived carbon (12C +13C). Bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) was estimated as: IB/(IB+RB), where IB and RB are the quantities of diatom-derived carbon incorporated into bacterial biomass and respired over the duration of the experiment respectively. The resulting estimates are considered to be minimum estimates as a proportion of the quantified respiration may have been attributable to metazoan organisms (see Discussion).

Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were conducted in the ‘R’ programming environment [25] using the ‘nlme’ and ‘MASS’ packages [26], [27]. Repeated seawater sampling from each core necessitated that all of the resulting benthic flux data were analysed using linear mixed-effects (LME) models that included core identity as a random effect [28]. Variance covariate terms were also incorporated in the random structure of the models in instances of unequal variances. The fixed structures of the statistical models initially incorporated time and treatment and an interaction between these terms. Backwards model selection, based on the likelihood ratio test using maximum likelihood estimation, was employed to determine the fixed structures of the optimal models (OMs) [28], [29]. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation was used to generate model parameter estimates. All OMs were validated to check that the underlying assumptions were met: Normality of residuals was examined by plotting theoretical quantiles versus standardized residuals (Q-Q plots); homogeneity of variance was assessed by plotting residual versus fitted values; independence was verified by plotting residuals versus each covariate [28]. Estimated values±standard errors (se) are presented.

Bacterial carbon uptake and BGE data were box-cox transformed to attain homogeneity of variance prior to analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post-hoc multiple comparisons were achieved using Tukey’s honest significant difference tests. Treatment effects on the proportional uptake of diatom-derived carbon into individual PLFAs, a relative indication of the structure of the active microbial community [30], were examined using correlation-based principle components analysis [31]. The PLFAs 14:0, 16:1(n-7), 16:1(n-5), 16:0 and all C18s were excluded from this analysis owing to their prevalence in the diatoms [18].

Results

Benthic Fluxes

Concentrations of NH4-N and TOx-N were inversely related (Figs. 1A and 1B): NH4-N increased at a rate of 1.71 mmol ±0.11 m−2 d−1 (L.Ratio = 105.44, df1, p<0.001; Table S1) and TOx-N decreased at a rate of 1.27±0.15 mmol m−2 d−1 (L.Ratio = 50.90, df1, p<0.001; Table S2). These rates were not affected by the quantities of added diatoms (Time×Treatment interactions; L.Ratios<4.5, df3, p>0.21 in both cases). Oxygen concentrations declined significantly over time (Fig. 1C; L.Ratio = 146.91, df1, p<0.001; Table S3) but drawdown rates were not affected by the quantity of added diatoms (Time×Treatment interaction; L.Ratio = 5.09, df3, p = 0.165); oxygen was consumed at a rate of 33.45±1.43 mmol m−2 d−1. In contrast, the rate at which diatom-derived carbon was mineralized increased significantly with increasing quantities of added material (Fig. 1D; Time×Treatment interaction; L.Ratio = 146.73, df2, p<0.001; Table S4); mineralization rates in the low, medium and high treatments are presented in Table 1.

Figure 1. Resource-quantity effects on benthic fluxes.

Figure 1

Temporal trends in the concentrations of NH4-N (A), TOx-N (B), oxygen (C) and respired diatom-derived carbon (D). Data from the control, low-, medium- and high-treatments are represented by squares, triangles, vertical- and diagonal crosses respectively.

Table 1. The effect of resource-quantity on estuarine benthic carbon budgets.

Resource quantity
Low Medium High
Mineralization 0.143±0.05 (3.4) 1.149±0.06 (2.8) 6.589±0.50 (1.6)
Bacterial uptake 0.096±0.01 (2.3) 1.314±0.12 (3.2) 8.201±1.51 (2.0)
BGE 0.40±0.02 0.53±0.02 0.55±0.04

Mineralization and uptake units are mmol C m−2 d−1±SEM. Estimated bacterial growth efficiencies (BGE) are expressed as proportions±SEM. Values in parentheses represent the percentage of total carbon added.

Microbial Carbon Processing

The quantities of diatom-derived carbon incorporated into bacterial biomass at the end of the experiment increased significantly with the quantity of material added (Table 1; F = 436.45, df2,6, p<0.001). Treatment effects on BGE were also apparent (Table 1; F = 10.25, df2,6, p = 0.012). The proportional uptake of diatom-derived carbon into individual fatty acids differed by treatment (Fig. 2). The microbial community in the low treatment discriminated on the first principal component (PC1), with positive loadings of 10-Me18:0, i16:0 and i16:1 and negative loadings of 15:0, i15:0 and i17:0. Communities in the medium and high treatments discriminated on the second principal component (PC2); the former was characterised by increased carbon uptake into 17:1(n-8)c, 17:0, 19:1(n-8), ai17:0 and 12-Me16:0 and decreased uptake into 17:0cy and 19:1(n-6). The inverse pattern was observed in the high treatment.

Figure 2. Influence of resource availability on carbon uptake into individual phospholipid fatty acids.

Figure 2

Principle components analysis distance biplot visualising differences in the proportional uptake of 13C into the phospholipid fatty acids between the different treatments.

Discussion

Our measured fluxes of NH4-N, TOx-N and oxygen (Fig. 1A, B and C) are in good agreement with earlier observations from other temperate, intertidal mudflat sediments [32][36]. The null effect of resource supply on these fluxes (p>0.16 in all cases; Fig. 1) is consistent with previous benthic enrichment studies in which relatively small quantities of organic carbon have been added [23], [37], [38]. These data do not imply that oxygen and nitrogen cycle independently of the amount of organic carbon available; it is well known that the deposition of excessive quantities of organic material on the seabed impact upon benthic fluxes of oxygen and nitrogen [39]. Rather, they demonstrate that our substrate additions were sufficiently low to avoid driving a major change to the natural functioning of the benthos. It follows that the majority of the oxygen consumed during our incubations was used to catabolise substrates other than those introduced experimentally and/or for the reoxidation of reduced inorganic metabolites produced during anaerobic respiration [40]. Similarly, the observed nitrogen fluxes relate to the cycling of autochthonous substrates, and not necessarily to the activities of the microbial communities responding to the diatom additions.

Resource-availability had a significant, stepwise effect on the quantities of diatom-derived carbon that were mineralized (Fig.1D) and incorporated into bacterial biomass (Table 1). These data support the understanding that the catabolism of organic matter in marine sediment ecosystems, from tropical estuaries and Arctic shelf sediments to the deep-sea, is directly related to the quantity of labile respiratory substrates [38], [41][44]. Previous studies using two levels of 13C-enriched diatoms to investigate benthic carbon cycling also reported a similar, stepwise effect of substrate availability on mineralization rates in coastal and deep-sea sediment ecosystems [45], [46]. Our study illustrates the sensitivity of 13C tracer experiments relative to measuring bulk ecosystem parameters such as oxygen consumption. It also highlights the need for caution when attempting comparisons between different 13C tracer studies; the outcome of such experiments clearly depends upon the quantity and quality of the available substrates [38], [45], [46].

Estimated BGEs increased significantly with the supply of labile substrates (Table 1), despite the temperature being well below the seasonal maximum of ∼20°C. Our estimates of BGE fall within previously observed values in estuarine and deep-sea sediments [14], [37], [38] and agree closely with the value of 0.5 observed for a natural marine bacterioplankton community growing on diatom aggregates [47]; they also correspond with an apparent plateau in BGE of ∼0.5 observed across a range of eutrophic pelagic systems [48]. Benthic metazoans, particularly nematodes, contribute significantly to carbon mineralization in estuarine sediments [1], [49]. We did not quantify metazoan contributions to mineralization processes, therefore our values of BGE may be considered to be minimal estimates. However, a growing number of studies report negligible mineralization and uptake of diatom-derived carbon by nematodes during short-term tracer incubation studies [37], [50][52]. This suggests that they are not directly involved in the catabolism of detrital material, at least within the time-scale of the present study. Close agreement between the BGEs presented herein and previous estimates suggests that the metazoan contribution to carbon mineralization in our experiments was low. This interpretation is further supported by other work which indicates that estuarine detrital carbon cycling is predominated by bacteria whereas the constituent metazoans feed selectively on living, autocthonous microphytobenthos [53]. Our observations indicate that the growth of the bacterial community in our experimental sediments was directly regulated by resource availability, as previously reported for bacterioplankton communities [11][13]. The positive relationship between BGE and resource supply reflects a progressive uncoupling between bacterial biomass production and respiration. This finding is consistent with theory and previous observations; a greater proportion of assimilated resources must be allocated to meet basal demands for biomass maintenance (as opposed to growth) when resources are scarce [12], [13], [54].

The relative uptake of tracer carbon into the different PLFAs examined in our study changed between the low, medium and high substrate additions (Fig. 2), likely reflecting a range of complex and interacting processes. Previous work using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis found no effect of resource supply on the prokaryotic community composition of tidal creek sediments [55]. Similarly, there were no appreciable changes in the proportional uptake of 13C into different PLFAs in a deep-sea sediment community when exposed to two different quantities of 13C-enriched diatoms [46]. Differences in the relative distribution of 13C-labelling between the treatments in our experiment may therefore reflect a resource-dependent change in the balance between catabolism and anabolism of individual PLFAs within the active component of the bacterial community; the relative abundance of certain PLFAs are known to be affected by external stressors [56], [57] and can change in response to the substrates used for biosynthesis [58]. However, the most dominant factors discriminating between the low-, medium- and high-treatments, 10Me-18:0, 17:1(n-8) and 17:0cy respectively, are typical of sulfate-reducing bacteria [56], [59]. This group of organisms is responsible for approximately 50% of all carbon degradation in shallow water sediments [60]. They grow under anaerobic conditions but are capable of aerobic carbon mineralization [61], [62]. We therefore suggest that the observed changes in 13C uptake into individual PLFAs predominantly reflects a progressive shift towards a sulfate-reducing microbial community as substrate supply increased [56]. However, the present data do not allow us to conclusively differentiate between the suggested explanations. The isotope-based PLFA technique is a powerful and sensitive method for discerning carbon uptake in natural microbial communities. The effectiveness of this approach is, however, tempered by an inability to differentiate between a true shift in the microbial community structure and metabolic changes within the same community owing to the poor specificity of individual biomarker PLFAs. Irrespective of the underlying mechanism, substrate-induced shifts in the synthesis of individual compounds has implications for the energetic and nutritional value of estuarine sediments to the communities of deposit feeding animals that inhabit them.

In conclusion, resource quantity had a profound effect on the rates of carbon mineralization and uptake into specific PLFAs in a temperate estuarine sediment microbial community. Processes that increase the supply of labile resources to this environment will result in a greater proportion of the organic carbon being retained in the benthic food web due to increased bacterial growth efficiency. Nevertheless, the absolute quantities of CO2 resulting from microbial mineralization will increase with the input of labile organic matter, at least over the range investigated herein. More work is needed to refine our understanding of the longer-term impacts of resource availability on microbial community structure and functioning and the implications for stocks of previously sequestered carbon in estuarine sediments.

Supporting Information

Table S1
Model output from the NH4-N concentration data analysis. The optimal model (OM) was a LME model that incorporated core identity as a random effect (L. ratio = 14.230, df1, pcorr<0.001) and allowed the residual spread to increase exponentially over time (L. ratio = 44.507, df1, p<0.001):
graphic file with name pone.0038582.e001.jpg
where ai is a random intercept and the index i refers to the core identity (i = 1,…, 12), and j to the observations within each core (j = 1,…,7). Random effect (a), variance function (b), correlation coefficients of observations made within each variance grouping (intra-class correlation) and fixed effects (d). *Note the intercept (baseline) is the control treatment.

(DOC)

Table S2
Model output from the TOx-N concentration data analysis. The optimal model (OM) was a LME model that incorporated core identity as a random effect (L. ratio = 5.390, df1, pcorr = 0.010) and allowed the residual spread to increase exponentially over time (L. ratio = 15.366, df1, p<0.001):
graphic file with name pone.0038582.e002.jpg
where ai is a random intercept and the index i refers to the core identity (i = 1,…, 12), and j to the observations within each core (j = 1,…,7). Random effect (a), variance function (b), correlation coefficients of observations made within each variance grouping (intra-class correlation) and fixed effects (d). *Note the intercept (baseline) is the control treatment.

(DOC)

Table S3

Model output from the oxygen concentration data analysis. The optimal model (OM) was a LME model that incorporated core identity as a random effect (L. ratio = 19.467, df1, p<0.001): Inline graphic where ai is a random intercept and the index i refers to the core identity (i = 1,…, 12), and j to the observations within each core (j = 1,…,7). Random effect (a), correlation coefficients of observations made within each core [intra-class correlation] (b) and fixed effects (c). *Note the intercept (baseline) is the control treatment.

(DOC)

Table S4
Model output from the DIC concentration data analysis. The optimal model (OM) was a LME model that incorporated core identity as a random effect (L. ratio = 48.237, df1, pcorr<0.001) and allowed the residual spread to increase exponentially over time and to vary by treatment (L. ratio = 179.335, df3, p<0.001):
graphic file with name pone.0038582.e004.jpg
where ai is a random intercept and the index i refers to the core identity (i = 1,…, 9), j to the observations within each core (j = 1,…,6) and k to the treatment (k = 1,…, 3). Random effect (a), variance function (b), correlation coefficients of observations made within each variance grouping (intra-class correlation) and fixed effects (d). *Note the intercept (baseline) is the low diatom-addition treatment.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

M. Rose is gratefully acknowledged for assistance with nutrient analyses. We thank everyone that commented on this article prior to publication.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: DM and BT have declared that no competing interests exist. AZ is affiliated with Highland Statistics Ltd and can confirm there are no patents, products in development or marketed products related to this manuscript. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Funding: DM is funded by the United Kingdom’s Natural Environment Research Council (NE/G014744/1). BT received funding from the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Heip CHR, Goosen NK, Herman PMJ, Kromkamp J, Middelburg JJ, et al. Production and consumption of biological particles in temperate tidal estuaries. Oceanorg Mar Biol Annu Rev. 1995;33:1–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cai W-J. Estuarine and coastal ocean carbon paradox: CO2 sinks or sites of terrestrial carbon incineration? Annu Rev Marine Sci. 2011;3:123–145. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frankignoulle M, Abril G, Borges A, Bourge I, Canon C, et al. Carbon dioxide emissions from European estuaries. Science. 1998;282:434–436. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5388.434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Borges AV. Do we have enough pieces of the jigsaw to integrate CO2 fluxes in the coastal ocean? Estuaries. 2005;28:3–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cai W-J, Wang Y. The chemistry, fluxes and sources of carbon dioxide in the estuarine waters of the Satilla and Altamaha rivers, Georgia. Limnol Oceanogr. 1998;43:657–668. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fenchel T, King GM, Blackburn TH. London: Academic Press. 2000. Bacterial biogeochemistry, second ed.
  • 7.Kelley CA, Martens CS, Chanton JP. Variations in sedimentary carbon remineralization rates in the White Oak river estuary, North Carolina. Limnol Oceanogr. 1990;35:372–383. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Middelburg JJ, Klaver G, Nieuwenhuize J, Vlug T. Carbon and nitrogen cycling in intertidal sediments near Doel, Scheldt Estuary. Hydrobiol. 1995;311:57–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson P, et al. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl. 1997;7:737–750. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Howarth RW, Sharpley A, Walker D. Sources of nutrient pollution to coastal waters in the United States: Implications for achieving coastal water quality goals. Estuaries. 2002;25:656–676. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kirchman DL, Malmstrom RR, Cottrell MT. Control of bacterial growth by temperature and organic matter in the Western Arctic. Deep-Sea Res Pt II. 2005;52:3386–3395. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.López-Urrutia Á, Morán XAG. Resource limitation of bacterial production distorts the temperature dependence of oceanic carbon cycling. Ecology. 2007;88:817–822. doi: 10.1890/06-1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.del Giorgio PA, Newell REI Phosphorus and DOC availability influence the partitioning between bacterioplankton production and respiration in tidal marsh ecosystems. Env Microbiol. In press. doi. 10(1111/j.1462–2920.2012.02713):x. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02713.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hubas C, Artigas LF, Davoult D. Role of the bacterial community in the annual benthic metabolism of two contrasted temperate intertidal sites (Roscoff Aber Bay, France). Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007;344:39–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ieno EN, Solan M, Batty P, Pierce GJ. How biodiversity affects ecosystem functioning: roles of infaunal species richness, identity and density in the marine benthos. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006;311:263–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baird D, Milne H. Energy flow in the Ythan estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Est Coast Shelf Sci. 1981;13:455–472. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nixon SW. Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia. 1995;41:199–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mayor DJ, Cook K, Thornton B, Walsham P, Witte UFM, et al. Absorption efficiencies and basal turnover of C, N and fatty acids in a marine Calanoid copepod. Funct Ecol. 2011;25:509–518. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Midwood A, Gebbing T, Wendler R, Sommerkorn M, Hunt JE, et al. Collection and storage of CO2 for 13C analysis: an application to separate soil CO2 efflux into root and soil-derived components. Rapid Comm Mass Spec. 2006;20:3379–3384. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–917. doi: 10.1139/o59-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.White DC, Davis WM, Nickels JS, King JD, Bobbie RJ. Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate. Oecologia. 1979;40:51–62. doi: 10.1007/BF00388810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thornton B, Zhang Z, Mayes RW, Högberg MN, Midwood AJ. Can gas chromatography combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry be used to quantify organic compound abundance? Rapid Commun Mass Sp. 2011;25:2433–2438. doi: 10.1002/rcm.5148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moodley L, Middelburg JJ, Soetaert K, Boschker HTS, Herman PMJ, et al. Similar rapid response to phytodetritus deposition in shallow and deep-sea sediments. J Mar Res. 2005;63:457–469. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brinch-Iversen J, King GM. Effects of substrate concentration, growth state, and oxygen availability on relationships among bacterial carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990;74:345–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. 2010. Available: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 2012 May 14.
  • 26.Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D & the R Development Core Team 2010 nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–97. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 2012 May 14.
  • 27.Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edition. New York: Springer. 2002.
  • 28.Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. Mixed-Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York: Springer. 2009.
  • 29.Mayor DJ, Zuur AF, Solan M, Paton GI, Killham K. Factors affecting benthic impacts at Scottish fish farms. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:2079–2084. doi: 10.1021/es903073h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boschker HTS, Middelburg JJ. Stable isotopes and biomarkers in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002;40:85–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Smith GM. Analysing Ecological Data. New York: Springer. 2007.
  • 32.Cook PLM, Butler ECV, Eyre BD. Carbon and nitrogen cycling on intertidal mudflats of a temperate Australian estuary. I. Benthic metabolism. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004a;280:25–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cook PLM, Butler ECV, Eyre BD. Carbon and nitrogen cycling on intertidal mudflats of a temperate Australian estuary. II. Nitrogen cycling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004b;280:39–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gazeau F, Borges AV, Barrón C, Duarte CM, Iversen N, et al. Net ecosystem metabolism in a micro-tidal estuary (Randers Fjord, Denmark): Evaluation of methods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005;301:23–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gribsholt B, Kristensen E. Benthic metabolism and sulphur cycling along an inundation gradient in a tidal Spartina anglica salt marsh. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48:2151–2162. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Porubsky WP, Weston NB, Joye SB. Benthic metabolism and the fate of dissolved inorganic nitrogen in intertidal sediments. Estuarine Coast Shelf Sci. 2009;83:392–402. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gontikaki E, Mayor DJ, Thornton B, Black K, Witte U. Processing of 13C-labelled diatoms by a bathyal community at sub-zero temperatures. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2011a;421:39–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mayor DJ, Thornton B, Hay S, Zuur AF, Nicol GW, et al. Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments. ISME J. In press. doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Kelly JR, Nixon SW. Experimental studies of the effect of organic deposition on the metabolism of a coastal marine bottom community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1984;17:157–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Glud RN. Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments. Mar Biol Res. 2008;4:243–289. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Arnosti C, Jørgensen BB, Sagemann J, Thamdrup B. Temperature dependence of microbial degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: polysaccharide hydrolysis, oxygen consumption, and sulfate reduction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1998;165:59–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boetius A, Lochte K. Regulation of microbial enzymatic degradation of organic matter in deep-sea sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1994;104:299–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kostka JE, Thamdrup B, Glud RN, Canfield DE. Rates and pathways of carbon oxidation in permanently cold Arctic sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1999;180:7–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Eyre BD, Ferguson AJP. Benthic metabolism and nitrogen cycling in a subtropical east Australian estuary (Brunswick): Temporal variability and controlling factors. Limnol Oceanogr. 2005;50:81–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Van Nugteren P, Moodley L, Brummer G-J, Heip CHR, Herman PMJ, et al. Seafloor ecosystem functioning: the importance of organic matter priming. Mar Biol. 2009;156:2277–2287. doi: 10.1007/s00227-009-1255-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bühring SI, Lampadariou N, Moodley L, Tselepides A, Witte U. Benthic microbial and whole-community responses to different amounts of 13C-enriched algae: In situ experiments in the deep Cretan Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). Limnol Oceanogr. 2006;51:157–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Grossart H-P, Ploug H. Microbial degradation of organic carbon and nitrogen on diatom aggregates. Limnol Oceanorg. 2001;46:267–277. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.del Giorgio P, Cole JJ. Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1998;29:503–541. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Findlay S, Tenore KR. Effect of a free-living marine nematode (Diplolaimella chitwoodi) on detrital carbon mineralization. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1982;8:161–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Urban-Malinga B, Moens T. Fate of organic matter in Arctic intertidal sediments: Is utilisation by meiofauna important? J Sea Res. 2006;56:239–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Moens T, Vanhove S, De Mesel I, Kelemen B, Janssens T, et al. Carbon sources of Antarctic nematodes as revealed by natural carbon isotope ratios and a pulse-chase experiment. Polar Biol. 2007;31:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gontikaki E, Mayor DJ, Narayanaswamy BE, Witte U. Feeding strategies of deep-sea sub-Arctic macrofauna of the Faroe-Shetland Channel: Combining natural stable isotopes and enrichment techniques. Deep-Sea Res Pt I. 2011b;58:160–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.van Oevelen D, Soetaert K, Middelburg JJ, Herman PMJ, Moodley L, et al. Carbon flows through a benthic food web. Integrating biomass, isotope and tracer data. J Mar Res. 2006;64:453–482. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Anderson TR, Hessen DO, Elser JJ, Urabe J. Metabolic stoichiometry and the fate of excess carbon and nutrients in consumers. Am Nat. 2005;165:1–15. doi: 10.1086/426598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Edmonds JW, Weston NB, Joye SB, Moran MA. Variation in prokaryotic community composition as a function of resource availability in tidal creek sediments. App Env Microbiol. 2008;74:1836–1844. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00854-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Guckert JB, Antworth CP, Nichols PD, White DC. Phospholipid, ester-linked fatty acid profiles as reproducible assays for changes in prokaryotic community structure of estuarine sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1985;31:147–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Guckert JB, Hood MA, White DC. Phospholipid ester-linked fatty acid profile changes during nutrient deprivation of Vibrio cholerae: Increases in the trans/cis ratio and proportions of cyclopropyl fatty acids. App Env Microbiol. 1986;52:794–801. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.4.794-801.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Harvey HR, Dyda RY, Kirchman DL. Impact of DOM composition on bacterial lipids and community structure in estuaries. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2006;42:105–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Taylor J, Parkes RJ. The cellular fatty acids of the sulphate-reducing bacteria, Desulfobacter sp., Desulfobulbus sp. And Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. J Gen Microbiol. 1983;129:3303–3309. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jørgensen BB. Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed – the role of sulphate reduction. Nature. 1982;296:643–645. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cypionka H. Oxygen respiration by Desulfovibrio species. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:827–848. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jonkers HM, Koh I-O, Behrend P, Muyzer G, de Beer D. Aerobic organic carbon mineralization by sulfate-reducing bacteria in the oxygen-saturated photic zone of a hypersaline microbial mat. Microb Ecol. 2005;49:291–300. doi: 10.1007/s00248-004-0260-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1
Model output from the NH4-N concentration data analysis. The optimal model (OM) was a LME model that incorporated core identity as a random effect (L. ratio = 14.230, df1, pcorr<0.001) and allowed the residual spread to increase exponentially over time (L. ratio = 44.507, df1, p<0.001):
graphic file with name pone.0038582.e001.jpg
where ai is a random intercept and the index i refers to the core identity (i = 1,…, 12), and j to the observations within each core (j = 1,…,7). Random effect (a), variance function (b), correlation coefficients of observations made within each variance grouping (intra-class correlation) and fixed effects (d). *Note the intercept (baseline) is the control treatment.

(DOC)

Table S2
Model output from the TOx-N concentration data analysis. The optimal model (OM) was a LME model that incorporated core identity as a random effect (L. ratio = 5.390, df1, pcorr = 0.010) and allowed the residual spread to increase exponentially over time (L. ratio = 15.366, df1, p<0.001):
graphic file with name pone.0038582.e002.jpg
where ai is a random intercept and the index i refers to the core identity (i = 1,…, 12), and j to the observations within each core (j = 1,…,7). Random effect (a), variance function (b), correlation coefficients of observations made within each variance grouping (intra-class correlation) and fixed effects (d). *Note the intercept (baseline) is the control treatment.

(DOC)

Table S3

Model output from the oxygen concentration data analysis. The optimal model (OM) was a LME model that incorporated core identity as a random effect (L. ratio = 19.467, df1, p<0.001): Inline graphic where ai is a random intercept and the index i refers to the core identity (i = 1,…, 12), and j to the observations within each core (j = 1,…,7). Random effect (a), correlation coefficients of observations made within each core [intra-class correlation] (b) and fixed effects (c). *Note the intercept (baseline) is the control treatment.

(DOC)

Table S4
Model output from the DIC concentration data analysis. The optimal model (OM) was a LME model that incorporated core identity as a random effect (L. ratio = 48.237, df1, pcorr<0.001) and allowed the residual spread to increase exponentially over time and to vary by treatment (L. ratio = 179.335, df3, p<0.001):
graphic file with name pone.0038582.e004.jpg
where ai is a random intercept and the index i refers to the core identity (i = 1,…, 9), j to the observations within each core (j = 1,…,6) and k to the treatment (k = 1,…, 3). Random effect (a), variance function (b), correlation coefficients of observations made within each variance grouping (intra-class correlation) and fixed effects (d). *Note the intercept (baseline) is the low diatom-addition treatment.

(DOC)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES