Abstract
The quality of life of ageing populations is increasingly determined by age-related changes to the mechanical properties of numerous biological tissues. Degradation and mechanical failure of these tissues has a profound effect on human morbidity and mortality. Soft tissues have complex and intricate structures and, similar to engineering materials, their mechanical properties are controlled by their microstructure. Thus age-relate changes in mechanical behavior are determined by changes in the properties and relative quantities of microstructural tissue components. This review focuses on the cardiovascular system; it discusses the techniques used both in vivo and ex vivo to determine the age-related changes in the mechanical properties of arteries.
In ageing populations, both life expectancy and quality of life are increasingly influenced by adverse changes in the mechanical properties of soft tissues. Within dynamic tissues such as blood vessels, the heart and lungs, the properties of tensile strength and passive elastic recoil are conferred primarily by collagen fibrils and elastic fibers respectively. In contrast to intracellular proteins which are continuously replaced1, extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins are remarkably long lived2,3. Elastic fibers in the cardiopulmonary system, may be required to undergo > 109 loading cycles during the average human lifetime4. The mechanical failure of these macromolecular assemblies and hence tissues, has a profound effect on human mortality and morbidity. This behavior has obvious parallels with the phenomena of fracture, fatigue and damage accumulation in engineering materials under static and dynamic loading.
In engineering materials mechanical properties are controlled by the microstructure. At the same structural scale in biological materials, the composition and architecture varies: (i) between tissue types, (ii) within individual tissues and crucially (iii) with chronological age and the development of disease. Specifically, in large blood vessels gross arterial stiffness, measured in vivo, increases (arteriosclerosis) both with age and with increased cardiovascular risk factors, including raised blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and end-stage renal failure5-9. As a consequence arteriosclerosis, as opposed to or often in conjunction with ‘atherosclerosis’ (referring to the lipid-core, pre-thrombotic, generally inflammatory process including underlying coronary or cerebral vessel occlusions), is thought to be closely linked to hypertension and hence to the development of heart and renal failure, stroke and aortic aneurysms10-13. Collectively these cardiovascular disorders have a profound effect on human well-being and are the main non-communicable cause of death worldwide (World Health Statistics 2009, World Health Organisation).
Age-related changes in the mechanical properties of other tissues such as the lungs14-16, may also be associated with increased mortality, however not all such changes are life threatening. The intervertebral disc for example, is a composite structure composed of an inner gelatinous core surrounded by aligned fibrillar sheets arranged in a plywood-like system17. Its degeneration is closely linked with the development of debilitating lower back pain17,18, which in turn is the most commonly reported musculoskeletal disorder in adults19. Despite the immense clinical and economic burdens that result from these disorders, the molecular mechanisms underpinning tissue stiffening and degeneration remain poorly understood. This is because it is difficult to directly correlate age-related changes in structural and molecular tissue components to local changes in mechanical properties20,21. We believe this is caused by the disparity between the length scale probed using traditional mechanical testing methods (10−3 – 10−1 m) and that at which key biological tissue components are organized (10−6 – 10−4 m). However, new techniques such as nanoindentation, AFM and ultra high frequency acoustic imaging, dramatically reduce the length scale at which mechanical information can be resolved, leading to exciting new areas of research into how the specific components of microstructures of biological tissues influence their mechanical behavior.
Here, we survey the techniques used to characterize the mechanical properties of tissues and using examples taken from the cardiovascular system, examine how they can be employed to assess the influence of ageing on mechanical behavior.
Tissue structure and ageing
The Young’s modulus, E, of a typical soft tissue is very low compared to engineering materials (E ≈ 1 MPa). In humans and mammals mechanical behavior is controlled by a small number of ECM proteins (mainly, but not limited to, fibrillar proteins such as type I collagen, fibrillin and elastin). With the exception of elastin, these proteins, in their fibrillar form, are thought to be much stiffer than the tissue. There is a general trend for the elastic stiffness of tissue components to decrease as the structural scale of the unit increases. As illustrated in Fig. 1, it is clear that the Young’s modulus of protein fibers is much greater than that of tissue component assemblies, which in turn are significantly stiffer than the elastic properties of bulk tissue samples. The size and elastic property regimes for cells are also shown in Fig. 1 for comparison. To obtain a complete understanding of how age-related changes in tissue microstructure influence tissue mechanical properties, it is necessary to use techniques to measure these properties across the appropriate length scales for tissue and its components, illustrated in Fig. 2. For example, osteoarthritis, a degenerative joint disease that is prevalent amongst the elderly, occurs as a result of degeneration of articular cartilage. Stolz et al.30 have demonstrated that in diseased tissue, the decline in cartilage structure begins at the molecular level and progresses to the higher levels of architecture, resulting in both structural and functional damage. However, the direct link between tissue degradation and mechanical property change for other types of tissues has not been made at each hierarchical level. It is likely that there are similar length scale related changes in other ageing tissues, however the nature and progression of these alterations remains to be determined.
The aorta (Fig. 3) is a good example of the multi-layered organization of soft tissues. This major blood vessel is a composite structure comprised of three main components: collagen fibrils, elastic fibers and vascular smooth muscle cells. In the elastic fiber system, fibrillin microfibrils both direct elastin deposition and subsequently surround the highly compliant elastin matrix where they may act as a stiffer reinforcing phase for this composite fibrous structure24. Collectively, these components are arranged into three concentric layers; intima, media and adventitia. The innermost layer, the intima, is composed of a thin layer of endothelial cells, with the outermost adventitial layer surrounded by loose connective tissue with thick collagen bundles. In terms of mechanical properties the central medial layer plays a crucial role32. In this region, the arterial wall components are organized into repeating medial lamellar units (MLU)33. Each MLU is composed of elastic fiber lamellae between which are sandwiched collagen fibrils and smooth muscle cells as well as finer, inter-connecting elastin fibers (Fig. 4). The MLUs within the medial layer, store elastic energy under physiological loads to drive recoil back to the resting state, thus allowing these vessels to not only to accommodate high blood pressures but continue to drive ‘smoothed’ blood flow during cardiac relaxation (diastole).
Large elastic arteries such as the aorta progressively stiffen throughout life, yet the underlying mechanisms that lead to this change at each length scale of the tissue architecture remain poorly understood. It has been reported that the elastic lamellae undergo fatigue and become fragmented and disrupted with time,32,34-36 although changes within the composition of the MLUs may also play a role33. However, there is no consensus in the literature as to whether the concentration of collagen and elastin increases or remains unchanged in the ageing aorta37,38. These conflicting observations are possibly related to the wide range of methodologies and tissue sources utilized by different groups4. For example, Cattell and co-workers37 state the importance of differentiating between changes in the absolute amount of a tissue component versus changes in its concentration. Both ECM organisation4 and relative composition have to be considered to fully understand mechanical property changes in ageing vascular tissues. Further, fundamental differences in the ageing process in distinct species may explain some of the apparent contradictions in the literature39.
Finally, the organization of the ECM4 is likely to play a key role in mediating the mechanical properties of tissues. In order therefore to relate structure to function in ageing tissues it is necessary to combine non-destructive ultrastructural imaging31 with the high spatial resolution mechanical testing methods that are discussed later. The importance of structure to biological function extends to the nanometer length scale, where molecular changes including aberrant glycation of collagen and elastin40,41, have been proposed as drivers for age-related macroscopic stiffening.
Characterizing the mechanical properties of tissue
In cardiovascular medicine, two techniques are commonly used to measure the elastic properties of blood vessels: pulse wave velocity (PWV), which is used to estimate large artery stiffness in vivo, and pressure or wire myography, which uses sections of small blood vessels obtained through biopsy and is therefore an ex vivo method.
From a clinical perspective it is desirable to make diagnostic measurements on the patient in vivo, hence PWV is widely used despite its limitations. However, ex vivo methods allow more detailed investigation of both the physiological and mechanical behaviors of tissue. Clearly any technique that requires large biopsy samples is impractical because it leads to significant discomfort to the patient; hence ex vivo methods are limited to very small samples. These techniques are invaluable tools for clinicians as they provide a single parameter indicative of cardiovascular health e.g. a measure of arterial stiffness with PWV. PWV is supported by myography which provides ex vivo measurements that better characterize the pathology of disease and ageing. These methods are therefore advantageous for clinical researchers despite grossly simplifying the actual mechanics. They do not provide detailed mechanical properties or allow the individual constitutive properties of the tissue components to be precisely determined, and thereby the constitutive laws that govern the overall biomechanical response of the tissue are not directly revealed. There are a number of papers which deal with this important topic. For example, Holzapfel et al.42 characterized the anisotropic and non-linear mechanical behavior of arteries using numerical calculation and an elegant constitutive approach. Such work has been particularly important in the study of aortic aneurysms43 but a detailed account is beyond the scope of this review.
In vivo measurements: pulse wave velocity
Although a number of techniques can be used to measure arterial stiffness non-invasively in humans44, the most widespread index of arterial stiffness is aortic PWV, the speed at which the elastic distortion of the blood vessel wall propagates in response to the pressure pulse from the beating heart (Fig. 5). PWV is recognized by clinicians as a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events45 and later mortality, independent of blood pressure and other risk factors. It is generally determined by recording the time (δt) taken for the wave to travel between two separate points (δx), thus PWV = δx/δt (Fig. 5).
PWV is related to vascular wall stiffness through the Moens-Korteweg equation, which in its simplest form is
1 |
where Ea and h are respectively the mean Young’s modulus and thickness of the arterial wall. The lumen radius is given by r and ρ is the blood density. Modified versions of this equation account for thick-walled tubes as well as blood velocity46. PWV measurements in humans are highly reproducible47,48. PWV rises progressively with age in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals and is negatively correlated with glucose tolerance8. PWV increases in the aorta49,50 between the ages of 10 and 50 from 6.5 ms−1 to 11 ms−1 and more rapidly after age 4551. A carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity > 12 ms−1 is considered an indicator of elevated cardiovascular risk52. Reference values for PWV as a function of age and blood pressure are shown in Fig. 6. Other techniques that measure arterial stiffness are not readily suitable for standard clinical use. However, PWV-based measurements are not only non-invasive but also simple and sufficiently repeatable to be considered as a routine diagnostic procedure45.
From a materials science perspective, PWV appears to be a very crude method for the measurement of arterial wall elastic properties because of the large number of assumptions inherent in the Moens-Korteweg equation. This is especially the case as the distance δx is maximized in order to allow easier measurement of the time interval. Clinicians prefer this approach for PWV measurement, because using a large value of δx samples a large length or artery and returns a better “clinical average”. Increased PWV is recognized by the European Society of Hypertension as being a factor that influences prognosis as an early index of large artery stiffening52.
Tensile testing of aorta samples
Measurements in vivo of increasing arterial stiffness with age are supported by ex vivo mechanical tests using bulk sections of aorta. Vande Geest et al.54 found a significant change in the biaxial biomechanical response of aged human abdominal aortic tissue (> 60 years) with loss of the high extensibility seen in youth (< 30 years). Using the same biaxial test setup, Haskett et al.55 investigated the relationship between the anisotropic mechanical behavior and the microstructure of the human aorta, finding that the aorta becomes more mechanically and structurally anisotropic after 60 years, with changes occurring preferentially in the abdominal aorta, which is more prone to diseases such as aortic aneurysms. This is in agreement with other studies which have demonstrated that the mechanical properties of the aorta vary along its length with the thoracic aorta being stiffer than the abdominal aorta. The region of the abdominal aorta close to the diaphragm is stiffest56,57 and a common site of aneurysms. Uniaxial tensile testing of aorta samples also found an increase in stiffness that correlates with changes to the ECM, for example due to diabetes28 as well as in vitro glycation58.
Mechanical testing of small arteries
PWV provides a clinical indication of large artery mechanical properties that may change with age or disease. However, even without large artery disease, restriction of blood flow at the microvascular level48 is associated with considerable increases in morbidity and mortality. There is debate as to whether the disease process begins in small or large vessels or occurs increasingly in both48. Small resistance arterioles with internal diameter < 1 mm can be excised from biopsy samples for diagnosis. Resistance vessels control their lumen diameter by pressure-dependent contraction or relaxation and contribute to precapillary resistance. Their role is to ensure that each capillary is provided with blood of the correct amount and pressure59. Mechanical property measurements on small resistance arteries are becoming increasingly important, with growing evidence that structural alterations at the microvascular level may be linked to overall prognosis in hypertension and related diseases60,61.
Techniques collectively termed myography have been applied to small resistance arteries over several decades and allow the contractility of these small blood vessels to be measured after agonist stimulation. An early method, wire myography, was developed by Bevan and Osher62 where rings of 200 μm diameter vessels were threaded on two fine wires, with wires on each end being clamped to ensure an isometric response. The wires are used to apply tensile loads to the small artery walls during testing. Myographic methods have become increasingly sophisticated since then59, including pressure myography where the intralumen pressure is controlled by cannulating the vessel, and thereby allowing pressure/lumen relationships to be determined (Fig. 7). Incremental distensibility is determined as the percentage change of the arterial internal diameter for each mmHg (133 Pa) change in intraluminal pressure63. The circumferential wall stress in the vessel is determined as shown in eq. 2.
2 |
where P is the intraluminal pressure, ri is the observed internal radius, for a given intravascular pressure both measured in calcium-free medium, and h is the wall thickness. The use of a calcium-free medium ensures that the radius and wall thickness of the arteries are determined in their relaxed state and therefore the passive characteristics of the vessels can be measured at a variety of intravascular pressures64.
Although pressure myography is carried out under more physiological conditions, less-sophisticated wire myography procedures can be advantageous in isometric conditions59. Pressure myography has been used on resistance arteries taken from rats, to show an increase in stiffness with age coupled with an increase in the proportion of collagen to elastin63,65. As with in vivo measures of large artery stiffness (such as PWV), myography only provide stiffness values for the entire vessel and not detailed structure-mechanical property data.
Point probe measurements of mechanical properties
New techniques capable of mapping mechanical properties with micrometre scale resolution can be used to identify the mechanical properties of discrete tissue components and thus probe how the effects of disease-related tissue remodeling influence tissue behavior and function. Nanoindentation, originally developed to characterize engineering materials66,67, is one such technique and has been used successfully with stiff, calcified tissues68-70. The technical difficulties in using this method with more compliant materials are challenging71. Calcified hard tissues can be polished to give a flat surface, which makes the use of nanoindentation relatively straightforward. The surface of soft biological tissue specimens cannot be prepared this way and the resulting high level of surface roughness, coupled with the inherent high compliance of soft tissues, leads to problems with surface detection and data interpretation when testing with a triangular Berkovich indenter. To accommodate this, flat punch and relatively large radius spherical indenters have been used72.
To measure the elastic properties of gelatine and agarose gels, Ebenstein and Pruitt72 found the most reproducible results using 100 μm radius conospherical indenters. However, as the contact radius of the indenter tip increases, the achievable spatial resolution of the measurement decreases. Large radius tips will tend to measure the average mechanical properties of tissues rather than the micromechanical properties of individual tissue components such as elastic fibers, which have a diameter of 2 – 3 μm (Fig. 3)73. This was acknowledged by Ebenstein and Pruitt74 in a recent review. However, nanoindentation testing instruments, protocols and analysis methods continue to be improved, hence the technique may become as powerful a tool for characterizing the micromechanical properties of soft tissues as it is already for hard tissues.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was originally developed as a topographic imaging technique. However, it was clear from the outset that the contrast in AFM images is related to the tip/substrate interaction and thus the elastic properties of both tip and substrate. A number of AFM imaging modes have been developed which exploit this mechanical contrast75. Extracting quantified (and reproducible) mechanical data from the tip/substrate interaction is, however, more challenging. Using an AFM to measure elastic properties follows an identical procedure to that used with nanoindentation; the force displacement curve is analyzed to deduce the contact stiffness. The elastic properties can then be determined, if the shape of the indenter is known and a displacement/contact area function available76. Despite these similarities, the mechanical design of an AFM is fundamentally different from that of a nanoindenter and AFM loading trains are substantially more compliant than those in a nanoindenter. For this reason, AFMs are better suited to measuring the properties of extremely compliant objects and there has been much work probing the mechanical behavior of cells and interpreting the biological significance of changes in their mechanical properties77. Cross et al. used AFM to show that metastasizing cancer cells were about five times more compliant than normal cells78. Lieber studied the properties of cardiomyocytes and reported an increase in cell stiffness with age79. Recent work on the stiffness of cardiomyocytes and the stiffness of tissue in a macaque animal model80 suggests that an increase in cell stiffness with age may also contribute to age-related aortic stiffening. Although AFM approaches have great potential, AFM-based indentation of cells is complex and the mechanical analysis used is often grossly simplified, e.g. with the application of Hertzian contact theory to the irregular topography and heterogeneity of cells. There are also limitations inherent in the technique which must be overcome, such as accurately determining the cantilever spring constant, as highlighted in a recent review81.
Nanoindentation and AFM-based nanoindentation provide new methods for probing the mechanical properties of ageing tissues. The techniques are able to work with unfixed tissue25: an important consideration as the use of fixing agents (chemical cross-linkers used to stabilize tissue samples are commonly used in the preparation of histological specimens) will severely impact upon the mechanical properties. An important issue that still needs to be resolved is the analysis of thin histological sections mounted on glass slides. Such samples have advantages because they can be used for transmission optical microscopy to characterize tissue components; however, the presence of a stiff substrate can result in significantly higher reported elastic modulus values25,76. Although the influence of such a substrate can be partially compensated by improved mechanical modeling, it can be difficult to measure the thickness of the thin tissue sample being tested, because this may vary significantly across a histological slice as a consequence of specimen preparation methods.
Acoustic analysis of mechanical properties
Scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) has attracted interest as a method for mapping the mechanical properties of both isolated cells and whole tissues82. SAM can provide both histological and elastic properties for soft tissue sections83 and even has potential to be used for intraoperative pathological examination because it does not require any special staining82. In the SAM, a pulse of high frequency acoustic waves (100 MHz – 1 GHz) is transmitted from an acoustic lens, through a coupling fluid (either water or a buffered saline solution) to the sample. The reflected signal is the result of interference between the reflected acoustic signal and any retransmission from surface acoustic waves. This generates contrast that varies periodically with defocus, from which the elastic constants can be calculated in elastically stiff materials84. The spatial resolution is a function of the wavelength of the acoustic radiation; with a 1 GHz acoustic signal resolution, the spatial resolution is approximately 1 μm. Although this method has been used to characterize the elastic properties of hard biological tissue, e.g. dentin and bone85,86, it is not suitable for use with soft tissue because of the attenuation of surface acoustic waves.
Jørgensen and Kundu have developed a frequency scanning method using SAM for thin tissue specimens mounted on glass slides; this exploits the interference that is generated from signals reflected at the fluid/sample and sample/substrate interfaces87,88. The phase relation can be controlled by varying the frequency (and hence wavelength) of the acoustic radiation, and the resulting periodic function, V(f), can be used to determine the acoustic wave speed in the sample, if the sample thickness is known. Because we are recording an interference pattern, the technique is sensitive to small changes in mechanical properties. However, analysis is not straightforward: V(f) is a non-linear function of specimen thickness, the acoustic attenuation through the sample as well as the relative reflection and transmission intensities at each interface. Kundu et al.89 addressed this problem by comparing the measured V(f) signal with a computed V(f) and then adjusted the variables of specimen thickness, attenuation and impedance, to optimize the fit between theoretical and experimental curves. Using this approach, relative measurements of tissue elasticity can be made on a microscopic scale without the need for any fixation or special sample preparations.
Recent developments and prospects for the future
Recently, progress has been made in the successful application of nanoindentation and AFM-based indentation methods to soft, biological tissues. New analytical approaches have been in part driven by the interest in characterizing hydrogel materials. Analysis methods developed by Oyen and co-workers determine the time-dependent properties accounting for both the viscoelastic and poroelastic properties of materials90. Currently in such work where the time-dependency of soft materials has been characterized, nanoindentation has tended to be conducted with large radius tips. Galli et al.90 used a 400 μm tip but spherical indenters > 3 mm have been used to determine time-dependent behavior of kidney tissue and costal cartilage91. Such methods should, in principle, be applicable to nanoindentation setups with small tip geometries and therefore provide higher spatial resolution measurements.
Lin and Horkay92 have reviewed the theories and analytical methods used to characterize the local elastic properties of polymer gels and biological materials. Although progress has been made in this area, they conclude that no hyperelastic model exists that is capable of serving as a universal constitutive law for soft elastic materials.
New experimental methods continue to be developed with AFM. Gavara and Chadwick93 have recently developed a frequency-modulated atomic force microscope (FM-AFM) that was used to assess the graded mechanical properties of guinea pig tectorial membrane. This non-contact method based on a hydrodynamic theory of thin gaps has a spatial resolution of less than 2 μm. This method appears to be relatively easy to implement on conventional AFM instruments and may prove to be particularly useful for characterizing vascular tissues.
We have been developing methods to determine the microstructural mechanical properties of histological specimens of vascular tissue25,94 and relate local mechanical property measurements with histological changes in the tissue. Using SAM at 1 GHz, we have mapped the elastic properties of aortic tissue sections for an ovine model of ageing95. The increase in stiffness (Fig. 8) correlates with increasing collagen content as determined from the same tissue sections.
As stated earlier, a key challenge when characterizing the biomechanical properties of soft tissues is to correlate information from conventional histological approaches with mechanical testing methods. Although SAM allows different histological layers to be visualized without the need for staining, the acoustic images can be difficult to interpret, particularly at higher frequencies (and therefore higher spatial resolutions). An exciting development appears to be the application of non-linear microscopy to soft tissue mechanics; such methods allow three-dimensional, non-invasive imaging of biological structures in response to mechanical strain96. This approach has recently been applied to study the structure and mechanical properties of lymphatic vessels96 (the lymphatic system is an important but poorly studied component of the circulatory system). The advantages of this technique arise from the fact that it can be applied to fresh, intact and unstained tissues thereby avoiding artifacts that may be introduced by conventional histology.
As well as the mechanical properties degrading at the microstructural scale, there is evidence that the molecular components of arteries are also compromised with pathology97. Using a technique called molecular combing24 individual fibrillin microfibrils, which have a beads-on-a-string appearance with a typical untensioned periodicity of 56 nm, can be stretched and extended. In turn, the degree of extension gives an indication of the mechanical strength of the microfibrils. Even in the absence of extrinsic factors such as UV radiation, which are known to induce profound ECM remodeling, Sherratt et al.21 have demonstrated that microfibrils extracted from photoprotected skin are weakened with age. We have recently shown that the morphology of these microfibrils is altered in a rodent model of type 1 diabetes97 and are exploring the mechanical properties of these molecular components with molecular combing (Fig. 9). To better understand age-related pathologies of soft tissues, further work is needed to relate the mechanical properties of tissues such as the aorta at the molecular and microscopic length scales with the macroscopic alterations widely reported.
This paper summarizes the various methodologies, both in vivo and ex vivo, that are used to determine the mechanical properties of soft tissues, with a particular focus on the vasculature. Further, some recent developments using materials science approaches are highlighted and this review demonstrates that a multi-faceted approach is required to better understand age-related pathologies. With inter-disciplinary approaches utilizing clinical, biomedical and materials expertise our understanding of age-related changes at the micro- and molecular level will continue to be advanced.
Instrument citation.
Bruker Multimode AFM with a Nanoscope IIIa controller, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Leica DM5000B microscope coupled to a fluorescence camera (DFC 350FX), Wetzlar, Germany.
PVA TePla SAM2000 Scanning acoustic microscope with a 1 GHz lens, Aalen, Germany
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the British Heart Foundation, The Wellcome Trust and AgeUK for funding. We would like to thank Dr Clare Austin for providing the myography schematic. Our collaborators must be thanked for providing the sheep aorta (Drs Andrew Trafford and Helen Graham) and rat aorta (Dr Natalie Gardiner) samples.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jennissen HP. Europ J Biochem. 1995;231:1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sivan SS, et al. Biochem J. 2006;399:29. doi: 10.1042/BJ20060579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shapiro SD, et al. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:1828. doi: 10.1172/JCI115204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sherratt MJ. Age. 2009;31:305. doi: 10.1007/s11357-009-9103-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Glasser AP, et al. Am J Hyper. 1997;10:1175. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aoun S, et al. J Hum Hyper. 2001;15:693. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boutouyrie P, et al. Hypertension. 2002;39:10. doi: 10.1161/hy0102.099031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cruickshank K, et al. Circulation. 2002;106:2085. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000033824.02722.f7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kimoto E, et al. J Am Sov Nephrol. 2006;17:2245. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lariviere R, Lebel M. Canadian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003;81:607. doi: 10.1139/y03-012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nilsson PM. Drug Aging. 2005;22:517. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522060-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mitchell GF. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105:1652. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90549.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lederle FA, et al. Brit Medical J. 2008;337:5. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lai-Fook SJ, Hyatt RE. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:163. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nanssens JP, et al. Europ Resp J. 1999;13:197. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meyer KC, et al. Mech Ageing Dev. 1998;104:169. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(98)00065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Freemont AJ, et al. J Pathology. 2002;196:374. doi: 10.1002/path.1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lawrence RC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26. doi: 10.1002/art.23176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miller JAA, et al. Spine. 1988;13:173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cattell MA, et al. Clin Chim Acta. 1996;245:73. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(95)06174-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sherratt MJ, et al. Brit J Derm. 2006;155:240. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang L, et al. J Biomed Res A. 2007;82:160. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gosline J, et al. Phil Trans R Soc Lon B Biol Sci. 2002;357:121. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sherratt MJ, et al. J Mol Biol. 2003;332:183. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00829-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Akhtar R, et al. J Mater Res. 2009;24:638. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2009.0130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gundiah N, et al. J Biomech. 2007;40:586. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Laurent S, et al. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1223. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.14.7.1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reddy GKS. Microvasc Res. 2004;68:132. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2004.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gozna ER, et al. Cardivasc Res. 1973;7:261. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stolz M, et al. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4:186. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Graham, et al. Matrix Biol. 2010;29:254. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Avolio A, et al. Hypertension. 1998;32:170. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.32.1.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.O’Connell MK, et al. Matrix Biol. 2008;27:171. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2007.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lévy BI. Dialogues Cardiovasc Med. 2001;6:104. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boumaza S, et al. Hypertension. 2001;37:1101. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.4.1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Osborne-Pellegrin M, et al. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:144. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00040.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cattell MA, et al. Clin Chim Acta. 1996;245:73. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(95)06174-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hosoda Y, et al. Angiology. 1984;35:615. doi: 10.1177/000331978403501001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ungvari Z, et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65A:1028. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sims TJ, et al. Diabetologia. 1996;39:946. doi: 10.1007/BF00403914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bailey AJ. Mech Ageing Dev. 2001;122:735. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00225-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Holzapfel GA, et al. Commun Numer Meth Engin. 1996;12:507. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Raghavan ML, Vorp DA. J Biomech. 2000;33:475. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00201-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lehmann ED. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1999;47:716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Laurent S, et al. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2588. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fukui T, et al. In: Future 9th international symposium on future medical engineering based on bionanotechnology. Esashi M, et al., editors. 2006. p. 919. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wilkinson IB, et al. J Hyper. 1998;16:2079. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816121-00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cameron JD, Cruickshank JK. Clin Exper Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;34:677. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Avolio AP, et al. Circulation. 1983;68:50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.68.1.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF. McDonald’s blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. 3rd Edition Hodder Arnold; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Monnier M. Experientia. 1987;43:378. doi: 10.1007/BF01940417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mancia G. J Hypertens. 2007;25:1105. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mattace-Raso FUS, et al. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2338. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vande Geest JP. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:815. doi: 10.1115/1.1824121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Haskett D, et al. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2010;9:725. doi: 10.1007/s10237-010-0209-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tanaka TT, Fung Y-C. J Biomech. 1974;7:357. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(74)90031-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Guo X, Kassab GS. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H2614. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00567.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Winlove CP, et al. Diabetologia. 1996;39:1131. doi: 10.1007/BF02658498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mulvany MJ, Aalkjaer C. Physiol Rev. 1990;70:921. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1990.70.4.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.De Ciuceis C, et al. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20:846. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Boari GE, et al. J Hypertens. 2010;28:1951. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833c2177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bevan JA, Osher JV. Agents Actions. 1972;2:257. doi: 10.1007/BF02087051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Briones AM, et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:696. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bund SJ. Clin Sci (Lond) 2001;101:385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Intengan HD, et al. Circulation. 1999;100:2267. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.22.2267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Oliver WC, Pharr GM. J Mater Res. 1992;7:64. [Google Scholar]
- 67.ISO 14577-4:2007 Metallic materials-Instrumented indentation tests for hardness and materials parameters, part 4: Test methods for metallic and non-metallic coatings. ISO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rho J-Y, et al. J Biomed Mater Res A. 1999;45:48. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199904)45:1<48::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bushby AJ, et al. J Mater Res. 2004;19:249. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bembey AK, et al. Philos Mag. 2006;86:5691. [Google Scholar]
- 71.VanLandingham MR, et al. Macromol Symp. 2001;167:15. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ebenstein DM, Pruitt LA. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69:22. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.20096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sherratt MJ, et al. Micron. 2001;32:185. doi: 10.1016/s0968-4328(99)00082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ebenstein DM, Pruitt LA. Nano Today. 2006;1:26. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Garcia R, Perez R. Surf Sci Rep. 2002;47:197. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Dimitriadis EK, et al. Biophys J. 2002;82:2798. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75620-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kuznetsova TG, et al. Micron. 2007;38:824. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2007.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cross SE, et al. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:780. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lieber SC, et al. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;287:H645. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00564.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Qiu HY, et al. Circul Res. 2010;107:615. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.221846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kirmizis D, Logothetidis S. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010;5:137. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s5787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Liang HD, Bromley MJK. Brit J Radiol. 2003;76:S140. doi: 10.1259/bjr/57063872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Jensen AS, et al. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:1943. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kushibiki J, Cubachi N. IEEE Trans. 1985;SU-32:189. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Gardner TN, et al. J Biomech. 1992;25:1265. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90282-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hein HJ, et al. Ann Anat. 1995;77:427. doi: 10.1016/S0940-9602(11)80149-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jørgensen CS, et al. Proc SPIE. 2001;4335:244. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Jensen AS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:1943. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kundu T, et al. Biophys J. 2000;78:2270. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76773-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Galli M, et al. J Mat Res. 2009;24:973. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Mattice JM, et al. J Mat Res. 2006;21:2003. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lin DC, Horkay F. Soft Matter. 2007;4:669. doi: 10.1039/b714637j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gavara N, Chadwick RS. Nat Methods. 2010;7:650. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Akhtar R, et al. Mat Res Soc Symp. 2010;1132:Z03. doi: 10.1557/PROC-1132-Z03-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Akhtar R, et al. Artery Res. 2009;3:125. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Arkill KP, et al. J Anatomy. 2010;216:547. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01215.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Akhtar R, et al. Mat Res Soc Symp. 2010;1274:QQ05. [Google Scholar]