Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth logoLink to BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
. 2012 Mar 29;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-20

Community involvement in obstetric emergency management in rural areas: a case of Rukungiri district, Western Uganda

Simon Ogwang 1,✉, Robinah Najjemba 2, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye 3, Christopher Garimoi Orach 2
PMCID: PMC3378461  PMID: 22455614

Abstract

Background

Maternal mortality is a major public health problem worldwide especially in low income countries. Most causes of maternal deaths are due to direct obstetric complications. Maternal mortality ratio remains high in Rukungiri district, western Uganda estimated at 475 per 100,000 live births. The objectives were to identify types of community involvement and examine factors influencing the level of community involvement in the management of obstetric emergencies.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive study during 2nd to 28th February 2009 in rural Rukungiri district, western Uganda. A total of 448 heads of households, randomly selected from 6/11 (54.5%) of sub-counties, 21/42 (50.0%) parishes and 32/212 (15.1%) villages (clusters), were interviewed. Data were analysed using STATA version 10.0.

Results

Community pre-emergency support interventions available included community awareness creation (sensitization) while interventions undertaken when emergency had occurred included transportation and referring women to health facility. Community support programmes towards health care (obstetric emergencies) included establishment of community savings and credit schemes, and insurance schemes. The factors associated with community involvement in obstetric emergency management were community members being employed (AOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.02 - 3.54) and rating the quality of maternal health care as good (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.19 - 4.14).

Conclusions

Types of community involvement in obstetric emergency management include practices and support programmes. Community involvement in obstetric emergency management is influenced by employment status and perceived quality of health care services. Policies to promote community networks and resource mobilization strategies for health care should be implemented. There is need for promotion of community support initiatives including health insurance schemes and self help associations; further community sensitization by empowered community based resource persons rather than health workers and improvement in quality of health care can contribute towards effective management of obstetric complications.

Keywords: Obstetric emergency management, Maternal deaths, Community involvement, Uganda

Background

Maternal mortality remains a major public health problem worldwide especially in low income countries [1,2]. The reduction of maternal deaths by three-quarters, between 1990 and 2015, is a global concern, articulated as the fifth millennium development goal. Direct causes including haemorrhage, unsafe abortion, pregnancy induced hypertension, obstructed labour and sepsis contribute to 70% of maternal deaths, [1,2] while indirect causes include malaria, anaemia hepatitis, rheumatic heart disease or HIV and AIDS and factors related to health systems.

Uganda has high maternal mortality ratio estimated at 435/100,000 live births [3]. This is mainly attributed to direct causes of maternal deaths. Several factors including delay in seeking care, reaching health facilities, low socio-economic status, negative cultural beliefs and practices, and poor geographical access influence the high maternal mortality in the country [1,4-6].

Emergency Obstetric Care refers to a proven set of essential interventions geared towards reducing maternal deaths [4,7]. The core elements of emergency obstetric care include availability of essential drugs and supplies, patient referrals and the availability of skilled personnel to carry out effective interventions. Skilled health professionals working in favourable environment should be available and able to attend to every pregnancy and delivery [1,8].

Community involvement in health systems has been defined variably [9-13]. In this study, community involvement in obstetric emergencies' management are supportive measures/activities that influence/include making decisions towards seeking care; referring women; provision of essential physical and financial support, provision of transport and awareness creation by discussing issues on obstetric emergencies, communicating to health facilities/ambulance using available means like a telephone, bell, drum and or to community members regarding obstetric emergencies management so as to mobilize support for action.

The World Health Organization recognizes the importance of community involvement in health systems for several reasons [9,10]. First community involvement in health programs nurtures the aspect of ownership and individual self worthiness. Second, community resources can be leveraged to complement the available resources. Third, community involvement can expand the coverage of health interventions. Furthermore, community involvement promotes the identification of needs and delivery of health services including for obstetric emergencies' management for the beneficiary populations. Community involvement has been shown to enhance obstetric health outcomes [10,14] and improve utilization of emergency obstetric care, health seeking behaviour for obstetric care services and decision making process. Community involvement in health programs for obstetric emergencies strengthens health systems that promote utilization of services by women with obstetric emergencies [15].

Strengthening community involvement in health programme implementation has been identified as a key link towards improving maternal health through addressing the delays in seeking health care and reaching health facilities [1,4,16-19]. Thus community interventions including provision of men and women with information on sexuality and maternal health issues so that they may adopt and practice healthy sexual life style, empower women to recognize danger signs of obstetric complications.

Despite poor maternal health indices in low income countries, evidence indicates low community involvement in their management [6,8]. Knowledge about symptoms and or signs of obstetric emergencies [8,16,20], involvement and influence of men [15,20], lack of money and demographic characteristics [20], limited women autonomy in decision making to seek health care [8,21], level of women's education [8,17,18,22], perceptions on quality of health care [8], community support activities and programmes [6,16,23-28] are possible explanations in various settings. Successful community groups in facilitating access to emergency obstetric care have established funding schemes [6,29].

Evidence in Uganda, indicates that community organizations play an important role in health programmes [30]. Such institutions include burial groups, clans, insurance groups and Engozi groups (local name for community initiated and based groups for responding to a specific need of transporting the sick to a health facility using a locally made stretcher). In the Engozi groups for example membership of every household is compulsory. Members contribute cash for the purchase of a stretcher that is kept in the community for use in transporting the sick to a health facility [30].

Despite these, Uganda has inadequate comprehensive emergency obstetric care services at both primary and tertiary levels [31]. In response, the government of Uganda put in place a framework for accelerating the measures towards attainment of fifth millennium development goal target by 2015 [32]. Rukungiri district has limited health facilities that provide basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric care with two level IV health centres and two hospitals. Nearly, three quarters (77%) of the population lives within 5 km of a health facility [33]. The health indices in the district were poor, with doctor: population ratio of 1:18,513; nurse: population ratio of 1:895; midwife: child-bearing women ratio of 1:987 [34], while only 44.3% mothers deliver at health facilities [35]. So without information on how the community was involved in the management of obstetric emergencies including prevailing types of community involvement and factors influencing level of community involvement in the management of obstetric emergencies, the Rukungiri District Health Team could not design appropriate, effective and cost-efficient strategies for its improvement in efforts to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. The study aim was to investigate community involvement in obstetric emergency management so as to inform strategies for improving maternal health status in the district. The objectives of this study were: to identify types of community involvement available/undertaken; and examine factors influencing level of community involvement in obstetric emergency management in the district.

Methods

Study setting

The study was conducted in Rukungiri District, western Uganda. Rukungiri district had a total population of 300,800 inhabitants; over 90% live in rural areas and engaged in subsistence agriculture [33]. The district was composed of two counties namely Rubabo (peri-urban) and Rujumbura (urban), 11 sub-counties, 77 parishes and 825 villages. Rukungiri District had two hospitals, two level IV health centres and 16 level III health centres and 42 level II health centres [36]. In 2008, the district had a total of 12 doctors, 117 nurses/midwives and 137 health staff of other categories providing health services. The district was selected based on its rural location far away (about 400 km) from Kampala capital city of Uganda, population distribution mainly in rural areas and relies on subsistence agriculture, poor maternal health status as indicated by a high maternal mortality ratio, low base of skilled health worker availability and poor nature of road network which is typical of most disadvantaged Ugandan districts.

Study design, participants and sampling procedure

This was a descriptive study. Participants were heads of households who had lived in the district for at least two years and had children born within 24 months prior to the study. Both Rubabo and Rujumbura Counties were included in the study. The sample size was estimated using the modified Kish Leslie (1965) sampling formula with a 95% confidence interval, a precision of 5%, an estimated proportion of heads of households who make decisions to seek care for obstetric complications of 50% and a non-response rate of 10%. The sample size was calculated to be 428 heads of households but 448 were interviewed. Multistage sampling method was used to select study participants. We used simple random sampling to select six sub-counties namely Nyarushanje, Kebisoni, Rukungiri Town Council, Kagunga, Nyakagyeme and Bugangari. There were 42 parishes in the six sub-counties. From the 42 parishes, 32 villages (15.1%) were randomly selected. From each village 14 households were randomly selected, hence a total of 448 households were selected. The head of household from each selected household was interviewed.

To select the household in each village the interviewer moved to its centre. To determine the initial direction of movement a bottle was spun. The starting household was selected randomly from the number of the households in the pre-determined direction. The heads of households in the selected households were interviewed. From the first household, the subsequent nearest household was selected. However, if in any of the selected household there was no eligible respondent, the interviewer moved to the next immediate household and interviewed the head of the household, and then continued till the required number of respondents in that village (cluster) was obtained. We interviewed a total of 108 (24.1%) women and 340 (75.9%) men which corresponds to the district's sex distribution of heads of household [3].

Data collection

Data were collected using standardized semi-structured questionnaires. The questions covered several aspects including individual characteristics, community and health services variables. Individual characteristics included sex, age, highest level of education, religion, current marital status, current employment status, tribe, number of wives/co-wives, number of pregnancies had, ever heard of a birth plan, ever/partner used a birth plan, types of messages a birth plan contained, payment for health care and saving funds to use in case of life threatening conditions during pregnancy, delivery or within 42 days after termination of pregnancy. Knowledge about symptoms of obstetric emergencies, actions to take in case obstetric emergency occurs, consequences of life threatening conditions and what communities do when obstetric emergencies develop among women in their communities were also included. Types of community involvement available/undertaken and factors influencing community involvement in the management of obstetric emergencies including health service and community factors and individual characteristics also constituted the questions.

Quality control

The interviews were conducted in the local language Rukiga. Pre-tested semi-structured questionnaires were administered by locally-trained interviewers who were supervised by the first author. Six locally-trained interviewers (all health workers) were employed for one month. The interviewers' training was conducted for over a five days period prior to the data collection. It covered mainly objectives of the study, sampling, procedures of data collection including dos and don'ts of interviewing and getting informed consent

Data analysis

The data were entered into EPIDATA version 3.1 and analysed using STATA version 10.0. First we carried out factor analysis to compute for the community involvement index. Prior to factor analysis the strength of inter-variable relationship including scale of reliability coefficient was assessed using Cronbach's alpha statistic test. The variable obtained after predict was changed into 3 quantiles i.e. high, medium and low.

The variables were further categorized into binary outcome (dependent variable), one value for high and the other for low community involvement. Associations between dependent variable and independent variables were tested. Independent variables were categorized into individual, community and health service factors. Individual characteristics included respondent's sex, age, employment status, whether saved money to use in the event of an obstetric emergency, perceived rating of general health facility care, rating of maternity health care, decision maker at household for health care seeking, number of wives and use of birth plans and knowledge about symptoms/signs of obstetric emergencies. Symptoms/signs of obstetric emergencies included vaginal bleeding, fits during pregnancies, high temperature within 42 days after termination of pregnancy, labour lasting more than 8 hours and swelling of the feet during pregnancy. In this study setting labour lasting more than 8 hours was considered start of prolonged labour indicating a stage when a medical doctor is expected to take action to accelerate or deliver the mother to avert adverse outcomes. Swelling of the feet though can be a normal haemodynamic physiological change, it was included to highlight the fact that not all swelling of the feet can be indicative of normal body changes but could be of progressive high blood pressure or actual severe pre-eclampsia if consistent with high blood pressure and/or protein found in urine and thus the need for women to seek health care provider's attention where the distinction is made to avoid missing a pathological state. Community factors included sensitization of the community members by their local leaders, distance to nearest health facility, distance to the nearest maternity unit (level III and IV health centres or at hospital), conditions of the roads leading to health facilities, beliefs, community actions that members undertake in the event of obstetric emergencies and availability of community social support programmes. Distance to health facility was considered a plausibly important variable. Health service factors included health education of communities about obstetric emergencies by health workers, availability of communication facility, availability of ambulance for transportation of women, perceived availability of skilled health workers at health units. Odds ratio tests were used to determine the associations between the dependent and independent variables. Multi-variable analysis was then applied to variables that were significant at P-value < 0.05 after bivariate analysis plus those with p < 0.2 but are known to be plausibly important or confounders even though they were not significant at bivariate analysis. Logistic regression was performed in order to identify independent predictors for community involvement in obstetric emergency management.

Factor analysis involving 13 variables was carried out to generate the community involvement score which was later converted into a binary variable. Four factor loadings were retained as they contributed 56.1% of the total eigen values. The community involvement index was categorized into tertiles for ease of analysis using cross-tabulations.

Analysis was carried out to identify variables that affect the level of community involvement in obstetric emergency management. Variables that were important in the model for community involvement in obstetric emergencies' management and had a p value ≤ 0.2 were included. They included saving money for use, rating of quality of general health care, rating of quality of maternal health care, sensitization of communities on signs of obstetric complications by local leaders, belief about lack of money and conducting health education by health workers. The plausibly important variables and confounders were also included: distance to nearest health facility, distance to maternity unit, sex and age even though they were not statistically significant at bivariate analysis.

Ethical issues

Institutional consent for the study was obtained from the Makerere University School of Public Health Higher Degrees Research and Ethics Committee, Uganda National Council of Science and Technology and permission from the District Health Officer Rukungiri District. Informed verbal consent was obtained from all respondents. Research Assistants explained the purpose of the study to the respondents. Confidentiality was maintained throughout the study and thereafter. No name was indicated in the data collection tools instead unique identification numbers were used.

Results

Most respondents 85.4% were aged 25-54 years, 95.5% were married, 81.3% had attended primary and/or secondary level, 92.9% of respondents were Christians (52.9% protestant and 40.0% catholic) while 69.5% were employed (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

Characteristics Frequency % of 448
Age in years
15-19 9 2.0
20-24 56 12.5
25-29 101 22.5
30-34 99 22.1
35-39 101 22.5
40-54 82 18.3
Mean age (sd) 32.5 (7.6)
Age range 16 - 54
Marital status
Single 6 1.3
Married 428 95.5
Separated/divorced 7 1.6
Widow/widower 7 1.6
Level of education
None 54 12.1
Primary 274 61.2
Secondary 90 20.1
Tertiary 30 6.7
Religion
Protestant 237 52.9
Catholic 179 40.0
Moslem 17 3.8
Others 15 3.4
Employment status
Self-employed 265 59.2
Unemployed 130 29.0
Formal employment 46 10.3
Student 7 1.6
Tribe
Mukiga 222 49.6
Munyankole 124 27.7
Omuhororo 99 22.1
Others 3 0.7
Open in a new tab

Table 2 shows that the respondents were more knowledgeable about vaginal bleeding as a sign of obstetric complication compared to other signs of obstetric emergencies. Generally, females were more knowledgeable about most signs of obstetric emergencies than males. The level of knowledge about signs of obstetric emergencies significantly changed by employment status including vaginal bleeding (p < 0.01), swelling of feet (p < 0.001) and fits during pregnancy (p < 0.05).

Table 2.

Respondents' knowledge about the signs of obstetric emergencies

Respondents' characteristics Vaginal bleeding Swelling
of feet		 Fits
during pregnancy		 Labour lasting more
than
8 hrs		 High temp within 42
days after pregnancy termination
n % % % % %
Sex
Male 340 66.2 23.2 7.7 23.8 24.4
Female 108 74.1 24.1 11.1 22.2 28.7
Age in years
15 - 24 65 66.2 21.5 7.7 24.6 23.1
25-29 101 66.3 21.8 9.9 17.8 29.7
30-34 99 72.7 27.3 10.1 29.3 30.3
35-39 101 73.3 28.7 9.9 20.8 20.8
40-54 82 59.8 15.9 3.7 25.6 22.0
Marital status
Married 428 67.8 23.4 8.9 23.6 25.9
Single/separated/widow(er) 20 75.0 25.0 0.0 20.0 15.0
Level of education
None 54 59.3 11.1 0.0 24.1 16.7
Primary 274 67.2 24.5 10.6 24.1 27.7
Secondary 90 72.2 24.4 6.7 22.2 25.6
Tertiary 30 80.0 33.3 10.0 20.0 20.0
Religion
Catholic 179 70.4 27.9 10.6 24.0 25.1
Protestant 237 64.6 19.0 6.3 21.1 23.6
Moslem 17 88.2 29.4 11.8 35.3 35.3
Others 15 73.3 33.3 13.3 40.0 46.7
Employment status‡
Unemployed/Student 137 56.9 30.0 8.5 28.5 24.6
Formal employment 46 84.8 41.3 19.6 26.1 17.4
Self-employed 265 70.9 17.0 6.8 20.8 27.6
Tribe
Mukiga 222 72.1 26.1 10.4 25.7 26.0
Munyankole 124 63.7 19.4 6.5 23.4 27.4
Omuhororo/other 102 64.7 22.6 6.9 18.6 19.6
Number of wives
One 303 66.3 23.1 8.6 22.8 24.8
More than one 37 64.9 24.3 0.0 32.4 21.6
Number of pregnancies
One 22 72.7 31.8 4.6 31.8 22.7
Two to Four 58 75.9 24.1 10.3 24.1 29.3
≥ Five 28 71.4 17.9 17.9 10.7 32.1
Open in a new tab

Key: Significance is at p-value < 0.05;

‡ implies significance for vaginal bleeding p < 0.01, swelling of feet p < 0.001 and fits during pregnancy p < 0.05

The main support activities undertaken by community members before women developed obstetric emergencies were identification of transportation means and sensitization of communities (Table 3). The main activities undertaken when a woman developed an obstetric emergency were transportation of women and referring women to health facilities. There were significantly higher proportions of referral of women (p = 0.047) and use of ambulance at health facility (p = 0.037) in Rubabo County than in Rujumbura County (Table 3). The overall mean distance to the nearest maternity health facility where basic emergency obstetric care take place was 5.0 (range: 0.5-30.0) kilometres (km). However, mean distance to the nearest maternity was 4.2 (range: 0.5-22.0) km for Rujumbura County and 5.9 (range: 0.5-30.0) km for Rubabo County (Table 3).

Table 3.

Community practices and support towards obstetric emergency management by County

Community practices County Significance (z-
test p-value)
Rujumbura Rubabo
n = 238 n = 210
% %
Interventions before women develop obstetric emergencies
Conducting planning for support to give women 7.1 6.7 0.843
Identification of transportation means to be used
for women		 19.8 25.4 0.164
Sensitization of women on those conditions 5.0 4.8 0.891
Intervention when woman develops obstetric emergency
Taking her to health facility using stretcher 61.3 61.4 0.985
Taking her to the traditional healer 11.8 11.9 0.963
Referring her to health facility 32.4 41.4 0.047*
Mobilizing money to support her 14.3 18.1 0.273
Contacting the ambulance at health facility 1.7 5.2 0.030*
Support programmes Rujumbura Rubabo Total
n % n %
Community health insurance 7 9.3 8 10.1 15
Women development associations 11 14.7 6 7.6 17
Community zone saving and credit schemes 41 54.7 46 58.2 87
Community associations 12 16.0 10 12.7 22
Zone/Engozi/burial groups 4 5.3 9 11.4 13
Distance Rujumbura Rubabo Overall
Distance to nearest health facility
Mean distance in km 1.8 2.2 2.0
Standard deviation 1.0 2.4 1.8
Range for distance 0.5-10.0 0.2-30.0 0.2-30.0
Distance to nearest maternity health facility§
Mean distance in km 4.2 5.9 5.0
Standard deviation 3.8 6.4 5.2
Range for distance 0.5-22.0 0.5-30.0 0.5-30.0
Open in a new tab

Key:*statistically significant at p < 0.05

§Maternity health facility includes a level III and IV health centres and hospital

Table 4 shows that community members were two times more likely to be highly involved in obstetric emergencies' management if they: were employed (AOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.02-3.54, p < 0.05), rated quality of maternal health care as good (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.19-4.14, p < 0.05) or were not health educated by health facility workers (AOR = 2.22, 95%CI: 1.18-4.19, p < 0.05). Low community involvement in obstetric emergencies' management was exhibited by 52% of community members who did not save money for use when obstetric emergencies developed (AOR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.94, p < 0.05) and 88% of the community members if their local leaders' did not sensitize them on the signs of obstetric emergencies AOR = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.03-0.47, p < 0.01).

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with community involvement in obstetric emergency management

Variable Community involvement Unadjusted OR 95% CI Adjusted
OR 		95% CI
High Low
Sex
Male 151 82 1.00
Female 42 30 1.32 0.77 - 2.26 1.04 0.56 - 1.94
Age in years
15 - 24 23 18 1.00
25 - 54 170 94 0.71 0.36 -1.38 0.67 0.31 - 1.45
Employment status
Unemployed/student 70 25 1.00
Employed (formal/self) 123 87 1.98 1.16 - 3.37* 1.91 1.02 - 3.54*
Saving money for use when obstetric emergency develops
Yes 139 95 1.00
No 54 17 0.46 0.25 - 0.84* 0.48 0.25 - 0.94*
Rating of quality of general health care
Poor/Fair 129 62 1.00
Good 64 50 1.63 1.01 - 2.62* 0.91 0.48 - 1.71
Rating quality of maternal health care
Poor/Fair 118 45 1.00
Good 75 67 2.34 1.46 - 3.77*** 2.22 1.19 - 4.14*
Sensitizing communities on signs of obstetric emergencies by local leaders
Yes 3 14 1.00
No 190 98 0.11 0.03 - 0.39** 0.12 0.03 - 0.47**
Distance to the nearest health unit
≥ 5 km 3 5 1.00
< 5 km 190 107 0.34 1.17 - 3.53 0.23 0.05 - 1.08
Distance to the maternity unit
≥ 5 km 82 39 1.00
< 5 km 111 73 1.38 0.85 - 2.24 1.72 0.97 - 3.04
Conducting community health education by health workers
Yes 64 22 1.00
No 129 90 2.03 1.17 - 3.53* 2.22 1.18 - 4.19*
Open in a new tab

Key: significance is at p < 0.05:

Whereby we get * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001

Discussion

Our study showed that communities carry out several activities prior to and when women develop obstetric complications. The community interventions undertaken prior to women developing obstetric emergencies included planning for support to give women, sensitizing communities and identifying transportation means to use. This is similar to the findings in a study by Hossain and Ross which reported awareness creation on danger signs and or symptoms of obstetric complications and support for transportation of women who develop obstetric complications as key community support system interventions undertaken [37]. However, our study showed a higher level of community involvement in conducting planning for support to give women and identification of transportation means in Rubabo than in Rujumbura County. This is despite the fact that the mean distance to any nearest health facility or maternity unit is longer in Rubabo than in Rujumbura County. This can be attributed to level of need of these activities in Rubabo County.

The study revealed that the activities carried out after an obstetric emergency has developed include referral of women, using a stretcher to transport women to health facility, contacting an ambulance, mobilizing money to support women and taking women to traditional healers and were all more performed in Rubabo than Rujumbura County. However, these activities were performed more in communities least served by health services. This can partly be due to level of need of those activities in Rubabo County. We can also attribute this active community involvement to more effective community leaders/networks/groups in Rubabo County whose members conduct community mobilization or health education as part of the support activities linked to community health insurance scheme. In the study area there are community managed health insurance schemes for those members who voluntarily join. It may also be a recognition by the community of the lack of effective health services and hence the need to help themselves out in the face of adversaries or emergencies (ill health). Effort by government to support community initiatives such as through insurance schemes is very much a step in the right direction and should be scaled up.

Our study showed that several factors affect level of community involvement in obstetric emergency management including employment status and the perception of quality of maternal health care, offered by the health facilities. The finding that community members who are employed are twice more likely to be involved in obstetric emergency management may be explained by the fact that the employed members of community have the financial resources to pay for health care services and related costs. The cost of health care is a known hindrance to seeking care by women [38]. Studies in West Nile region of Uganda found financial limitations to maternal health care to be important [39]. This is expected as women would not be able to meet costs involved in accessing obstetric emergencies' services including transportation and purchase of medications. However, it is noteworthy that the only two hospitals and some lower level health facilities in the district are owned and governed as religious institutes (private not-for profit health facilities/non-governmental organisations [NGO]). These NGO partners in health to the district also support community managed insurance schemes linked to the two hospitals in Rubabo and Rujumbura Counties.

On the other hand, the finding that perceived high quality maternal health care by community members promotes high community involvement in obstetric emergency management is not surprising. This is consistent with results of a study done elsewhere in Uganda indicating that quality of health care affects its use [40]. Similarly other studies have shown that good quality of health care for obstetric emergencies can contribute to reduction of maternal mortality [5,41]. The need for good quality of health care reported in this study is consistent with findings of other studies [37,42].

We found that lack of community sensitization by local leaders on signs and symptoms of obstetric complications was negatively associated with high community involvement in obstetric emergencies' management. This is an important finding that implies the need for community mobilization for health care for obstetric emergencies by local leaders. Similar efforts by communities have been demonstrated to work in other settings [6,37]. Community mobilization is critical for planning and supporting women who develop obstetric complications. It helps in reducing delay in decision making to seek and reach health facility.

Surprisingly, our study found that when health education of community members on obstetric emergencies is done by health workers, there would be low involvement in obstetric emergencies' management. As noted above, the community members in this setting seem to respond positively to their local leaders. This may be due to community being used to taking proactive initiatives that are beneficial to them. In fact the high number of available social support programs for women who develop obstetric emergencies in this community may explain this. For example there are established community groups that use a locally made stretcher to carry women to health facilities who develop obstetric emergencies. This finding could also suggest that the health workers are actually not conducting health education [37] or if they do it does not influence knowledge and thus the desired behaviour change among community members. A study in Bangladesh, lends support to our study findings, in that, the behaviour change messages that were provided through government health interventions meant to improve knowledge and hence preparedness of community members about signs of obstetric emergencies never yielded the desired change [37]. A re-design of the communication messages with inherent use of several media and involving community members in the dissemination through community support mechanisms led to improved changes in behaviour and knowledge about signs and symptoms of obstetric emergencies. Thus community networks/groups in this study setting highlight the importance of communities in providing effective, acceptable and collective contribution to obstetric emergencies' management. It is also true that community networks can influence the individual behaviour towards seeking care for obstetric emergencies. Targeted interventions addressing community key networks and supporting resource saving/mobilization initiatives that are beneficial to the community for health care is fundamental in contributing to improved community involvement in obstetric emergencies' management. However, in the study setting, health workers conduct health education mainly at health facilities to mothers who visit antenatal clinics. The main messages delivered include general danger signs that can occur during pregnancy, nutrition during pregnancy, importance of antenatal care, services available and importance of health facility delivery. Messages with little focus on symptoms and signs of obstetric emergencies as an important subject were frequently delivered. This may also explain why there is low community involvement in obstetric emergencies management when health educated by health workers.

Our study had limitations. Taking only heads of households who had children within the last 24 months prior to the study could have excluded those who had a child but died or an abortion/foetal loss. However, these were considered and households were randomly selected into the study. The sampling of households was done by spin-the-bottle and proximity method. This has implications of less cost-effectiveness, time-consuming, and bias in the selection of households towards the middle of the village and probably those with similar socio-economic status. Elsewhere it is implied that it is not a true probability-based sampling method due to the higher probability for selection of the centrally-located households [43]. However, this holds true if the households in the centre of the village and those at its edge are different in terms of socio-economic status. This could not be established by this investigation. Evidence shows that using the global positioning system (GPS) to select a point on the edge of map and using the approach of selecting a reference on a generated grid map of the village are alternatives to spin-the-bottle and proximity procedure [43].

Conclusions

Types of community involvement in this setting include community practices and support programmes for obstetric emergencies' management. Community involvement in obstetric emergencies is influenced by employment status and perceived quality of health care services. Policies to promote community networks and their resource mobilization strategies towards obstetric emergencies' management should be implemented. The findings suggest the need to empower community own resource persons to educate community members rather than by health workers, improve quality of health care and promote income gainful initiatives for community members in order to empower them to use health services that can contribute to averting maternal deaths.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SO initiated the concept for the study, participated in designing the study, supervised fieldwork and data collection, performed data analysis and interpretation and drafted the manuscript and coordinated its writing. RN participated in designing the study. NMT participated in designing the study, data analysis and interpretation. CGO participated in designing the study, data analysis and interpretation. All authors participated in revising and approved the final manuscript.

Authors' information

Simon Ogwang MB ChB, MSc, MPH, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda

Robinah Najjemba MB ChB, MPH. Department of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye Bstat, MA Demo, MSc, PhD Senior Lecturer at the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Christopher Garimoi Orach, MB ChB, DPH, MMed, MPH, PhD is Senior Lecturer at the Department of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/20/prepub

Contributor Information

Simon Ogwang, Email: ogwangsp@yahoo.com.

Robinah Najjemba, Email: robinahnajjemba@yahoo.co.uk.

Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Email: naz@musph.ac.ug.

Christopher Garimoi Orach, Email: cgorach@musph.ac.ug.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Zepher Karyabakabo, District Health Officer and his team members for providing the required field logistical support throughout the data collection period. We thank the team of research assistants for the data collection including Ms Agnes Mutabanura, Ms Allen Tusasirwe, Sr Gloria Twinonomuhangi, Ms Sharon Kiconco, Mr Charles Barasa and Mr Moses Byaruhanga for their dedication in data collection and tools translation process. Special thanks to Magdalene Amujal of Kulika Uganda for funding this study. Many thanks to study participants for the data that generated information and their time that enabled us to gain better insight into community involvement in obstetric emergencies' management in rural settings in the low income country.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Reduction of maternal mortality. A joint WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Statement. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999. pp. 9–36. [Google Scholar]
  2. United Nations Fund for Population Activities. Distance learning system on population issues. course 6-reducing maternal deaths: selecting priorities, tracking progress. In Assessment Booklet: Student Copy. 2001;6:1–48. [Google Scholar]
  3. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and Macro International Inc 2007. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey. Calverton Maryland, USA: UBOS and Macro International Inc, Report. 2006;162:181. [Google Scholar]
  4. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium. Safe Motherhood. Report. 2005. pp. 1–2.
  5. Orach GC, De Brouwere V. Postemergency health services for refugee and host populations in Uganda, 1999-2002. Lancet. 2004;364:611–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16854-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmid T, Kanenda O, Ahluwalia I, Kouletio M. Transportation for maternal emergencies in Tanzania: empowering communities through participatory problem solving. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(10):1589–1590. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.10.1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Osungbade K, Oginni S, Olumide A. Content of antenatal care services in secondary health care facilities in Nigeria: implications for quality of maternal health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20(5):346–351. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. African Population and Health Research Centre and The World Bank. Averting preventable maternal mortality: delays and barriers to the utilisation of emergency obstetric care in Nairobi's informal settlements. Nairobi, Kenya: APHRC and The World Bank; 2006. 13, 21, 30, 36-37, 40, 47-48. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rifkin SB, Muller F, Bichman W. Health planning and community participation. World Health Forum. 1986;7:156–162. [Google Scholar]
  10. World Health Organization. Community involvement in health development: an overview. In: Oakley P, Kahssay HM, editor. Chapter 1 in Book on Public Health Action. Vol. 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999. pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kahssay HM, Oakley P, editor. World Health Organization. Community Involvement in Health Development: a review of the concept and practice. 5. Geneva: World Health Organization in Action; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  12. Oakley P, editor. World Health Organization. Community involvement in health development: An Examination of Critical Issues. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  13. World Health Organization. Community involvement in health development: Challenging health services. report of the world health organization study group; World Health Organization Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991. No 809. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Khan T. Reducing maternal mortality: emergency obstetric services for afghan refugee women in Pakistan. Power Point Presentation at International Rescue Committee Conference. 2008;19 [Google Scholar]
  15. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium. Emergency Obstetric Care Project. In: Luwei Pearson, Sandra Krause, Susan Purdin, Diana Quick, editor. Impact Report. Vol. 1. United States of America; 2006. pp. 1–3. 5, 7, 11, 14, 28 - 29, 31. [Google Scholar]
  16. Themmen E. Essential obstetric care: community awareness, involvement and support. Popline document no 116841, Abstract of Report in http://www.popline.org/docs/1162/116841.html accessed on 9th October 2008:1.
  17. Bank W. Health nutrition and population. Human Development Network Report. 2006;1-3:6–7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Levine R. "Millions saved" proven successes in global health. Global Health Link, Magazine of The Global Health Council. 2005;134:7. [Google Scholar]
  19. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1091–110. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Odimegwu C. Men's role in emergency obstetric care in Nigeria. Report to the Takemi Program in International Health. Boston: Harvard School of Public Health; 2001. pp. 2–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pembe A, Urasa D, Darj E, Carlotedt A, Olsson P. Qualitative study on maternal referrals in rural Tanzania: decision making and acceptance of referral advice. Reproductive Health in Emergencies Conference Abstract Book. 2008;1:71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Abrejo G, Farina S, Babar T, Saleem S. International conference on population and development and millennium development goals: missing links and common grounds. Reproductive Health. 2008;5(4):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-5-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nour NM. An introduction to global women's health. Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2008;1(1):3–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Amado RP. Increasing access to reproductive health services in emergencies through partnerships in Philippines. Reproductive Health in Emergencies Conference Abstract Book. 2008;1:69. [Google Scholar]
  25. Orach GC. Access to sexual and reproductive health services by internally displaced persons in Kitgum and Pader Districts, Northen Uganda. Reproductive Health in Emergencies Conference Abstract Book. 2008;1:68. [Google Scholar]
  26. Post M. Preventing maternal mortality through emergency obstetric care. in http://www.popline.org/docs/1234/131099.html accessed on 9th October 2008: 1.
  27. Reproductive health response in conflict consortium. Safe motherhood. Report. 2007. pp. 1–2.
  28. Kayongo M, Esquiche E, Luna MR, Frias G, Vega-centeno L, Bailey P. Strengthening emergency obstetric care in Ayacucho, Peru. Averting maternal deaths and disability. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;92:299–3076. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chiwuzie J, Okojie O, Okolocha C, Omorogbe S, Orosanye A, Akpala W, Ande B, Onogwe B, Oikeh E. Emergency loan funds to improve access to obstetric care in Ekpoma, Nigeria. Abstract of the Report. 2008. p. 1. [DOI] [PubMed]
  30. Kisubi M, Mugaju J. Rural Health Providers in South-West Uganda. European Development Fund/Rural Health Programme. Book. First. Fountain Publishers Limited, Kampala, Uganda; 1999. pp. 78–94. [Google Scholar]
  31. Republic of Uganda. A national needs assessment of emergency obstetric care process indicators. Status of Emergency Obstetric Care in Uganda Report. 2004;1:3–12. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ministry of Health. Road Map for Accelerating the Reduction of Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality in Uganda 2006-2015. Vol. 1. Kampala, Uganda; 2009. pp. 26–27. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rukungiri District Local Government. District Health Sector Strategic Plan II 2005/06 - 2009/10. Strategic Plan Manual. 2005;2:4–11. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rukungiri District Local Government. District Statistical Abstract. Health Department Statistics, Rukungiri, Uganda. 2007;1:3. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ogwang S, Halage A, Karyabakabo Z, Rutebemberwa E. Assessment of emergency obstetric care interventions in Rukungiri District, Uganda. Field Report and Makerere University College of Health Sciences 4th Scientific Conference Abstract book. Makerere University School of Public Health, Uganda. 2008;15 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rukungiri District Local Government. Rukungiri district three year development plan. Manual. 2007;1:1–3. [Google Scholar]
  37. Atuyambe L, Mirembe F, Mbona TN, Anika J, Kirumira KE, Faxelid E. Adolescent and adult first time mothers' health seeking practices during pregnancy and early motherhood in Wakiso District, Central Uganda. Reproductive Health, Biomedical Central, Open Access. 2008;5:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-5-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Orach GC, Dubourg D, De Brouwere V. Costs and coverage of reproductive health interventions in three refugee-affected districts, Uganda. Journal of Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2007;12(3):459–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kiguli J, Kiracho-Ekirapa E, Okui-Olico, Mutebi A, MacGregor H, Pariyo GW. Increasing access to quality healthcare for the poor: Community perceptions on quality care in Uganda. Open Access, Dove Medical Press Limited. 2009;3:77–85. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s4091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Orach GC, De Brouwere V. Integrating refugee and host health services in West Nile districts, Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21:53–64. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czj007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kyomuhendo BG. Low use of rural maternity services in uganda: impact of women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources. Reprod Health Matters. 2003;21:16–26. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(03)02176-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hossain J, Ross RS. The effect of addressing demand for as well as supply of emergency obstetric care in Dinajpur, Bangladesh. International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Published by Elsevier Ireland Limited. 2006;92:320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rebecca Grais F, Angela Rose MC, Jean-Paul Guthmann. Don't spin the pen: two alternative methods for second-stage sampling in urban cluster surveys. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology. 2007;4(8):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-4-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES