Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 May 5;68(Pt 6):m724. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812019381

Diaqua­dichloridobis[quinazolin-4(1H)-one-κN 3]nickel(II)

Shirin Shomurotova a, Kambarali K Turgunov b,*, Nasir Mukhamedov b, Bakhodir Tashkhodjaev b
PMCID: PMC3379069  PMID: 22719290

Abstract

In the title complex, [NiCl2(C8H6N2O)2(H2O)2], the NiII ion is located on an inversion center and is six-coordinated by two N atoms of 1H-quinazolin-4-one ligands, two chloride ions and two water mol­ecules. The water mol­ecules are involved in intra- and inter­molecular O—H⋯O and O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonding. Inter­molecular N—H⋯O and N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds are formed between ligands. In addition, weak π–π inter­actions are observed between the benzene rings of the ligands [centroid–centroid distance = 3.580 (3) Å]. The inter­molecular hydrogen bonds and π–π inter­actions lead to the formation of a three-dimensional supra­molecular network.

Related literature  

For a Cd(II) coordination polymer with quinazolin-4(3H)-one, see: Turgunov & Englert (2010) and for a Cu(II) coordination compound with quinazolin-4(1H)-one, see: Turgunov et al. (2010).graphic file with name e-68-0m724-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [NiCl2(C8H6N2O)2(H2O)2]

  • M r = 457.94

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 6.7800 (5) Å

  • b = 18.741 (2) Å

  • c = 6.6106 (5) Å

  • β = 93.782 (8)°

  • V = 838.14 (13) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.92 mm−1

  • T = 295 K

  • 0.16 × 0.16 × 0.04 mm

Data collection  

  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) T min = 0.621, T max = 1.000

  • 3040 measured reflections

  • 1686 independent reflections

  • 1046 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.047

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.052

  • wR(F 2) = 0.139

  • S = 0.94

  • 1686 reflections

  • 132 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.75 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812019381/hg5221sup1.cif

e-68-0m724-sup1.cif (15.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812019381/hg5221Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m724-Isup2.hkl (83.1KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1W—H1W⋯Cl1i 0.85 (4) 2.56 (3) 3.371 (4) 160 (6)
O1W—H2W⋯O1ii 0.85 (5) 1.87 (6) 2.641 (5) 150 (11)
N1—H1A⋯O1iii 0.86 2.44 3.116 (5) 136
N1—H1A⋯Cl1iv 0.86 2.59 3.256 (4) 135
C2—H2A⋯O1W 0.93 2.42 2.958 (6) 117

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan for supporting this study (grant FA–F7–T185).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In the title compound NiII ion is located on the inversion center and has an octahedral coordination enviroment: two ligands coordinated via N atoms, two chloride ligands and two aqua ligands (Figure 1). The distances between Ni and coordination atoms are the following: d(Ni–N3)= 2.112 (4) Å, d(Ni–Cl)=2.445 (1) Å, d(Ni–Ow)=2.084 (3) Å. In the isostructural CuII complex Cu–Ow distance was longer (2.512 Å) because of the Jahn-Teller elongation effect (Turgunov et al., 2010).

The flat quinazolinone ligand is a little tilted in respect to metal–nitrogen vector and the dihedral angle between the least squares plane through the ligand and the metal–halide–water plane amounts to 84.33 (9)°.

Aqua ligands are involved in intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding. Intramolecular H-bonding is occurring with carbonyl group of the ligand. An intermolecular H-bonding of aqua and chloride ligands gives raise to chains along [001] (Figure 2). In addition, between ligand and water molecules are formed weak C—H···O hydrogen bonds. Intermolecular N—H···O and N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds formed between the organic and chloride ligands link molecular complexes into hydrogen-bonded chains along [100] (Figure 3; Table 1). Weak π-π ring interactions connect the molecular complexes along [010] and [001] directions. [Cg1···Cg1v]=3.580 Å, where Cg1=C4AC5C6C7C8C8A; v=x, 3/2 - y,1/2 + z].

Experimental

A solution of 23.77 mg (0.1 mmol) of nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate in 1 ml of water was added to a solution of 29.23 mg (0.2 mmol) of 3H-quinazolin-4-one in 3 ml of ethanol. The solution allowed to stand at 50° C temperature for one week, after which colourless crystals were obtained.

Refinement

Ligand H atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding on their C and N atoms, with C—H distances of 0.93 Å (aromatic), N—H distance of 0.86 Å and were refined with Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(C),Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(N). Coordinated water H atoms were found by difference Fourier synthesis and refined isotropically with distance restrains of 0.85 Å [O1w—H1w =0.85 (4) Å, O1w—H2w = 0.85 (5) Å].

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title complex with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Crystal packing of the title compound viewed along the a direction showing the formation a hydrogen-bonded chain along [001].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Part of the crystal structure of the title compound showing the formation a hydrogen-bonded chain along [100].

Crystal data

[NiCl2(C8H6N2O)2(H2O)2] F(000) = 468
Mr = 457.94 Dx = 1.815 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 792 reflections
a = 6.7800 (5) Å θ = 4.7–75.6°
b = 18.741 (2) Å µ = 4.92 mm1
c = 6.6106 (5) Å T = 295 K
β = 93.782 (8)° Rhombic plates, colourless
V = 838.14 (13) Å3 0.16 × 0.16 × 0.04 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby diffractometer 1686 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Cu) X-ray Source 1046 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.047
Detector resolution: 10.2576 pixels mm-1 θmax = 75.9°, θmin = 4.7°
ω scans h = −8→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) k = −23→13
Tmin = 0.621, Tmax = 1.000 l = −8→8
3040 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.139 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.94 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0729P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1686 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
132 parameters Δρmax = 0.75 e Å3
2 restraints Δρmin = −0.51 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ni1 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.0271 (3)
Cl1 0.30215 (17) 0.45677 (7) 0.27085 (17) 0.0340 (3)
O1 0.6109 (5) 0.66887 (19) 0.0800 (5) 0.0340 (8)
N1 0.0343 (5) 0.6502 (2) −0.0692 (6) 0.0301 (9)
H1A −0.0903 0.6434 −0.0945 0.036*
C2 0.1533 (6) 0.5947 (3) −0.0494 (6) 0.0285 (10)
H2A 0.0971 0.5498 −0.0684 0.034*
N3 0.3448 (5) 0.5977 (2) −0.0048 (5) 0.0272 (9)
C4 0.4314 (7) 0.6634 (3) 0.0282 (7) 0.0272 (10)
C4A 0.3084 (7) 0.7271 (3) −0.0011 (7) 0.0268 (10)
C5 0.3861 (7) 0.7962 (3) 0.0203 (7) 0.0299 (10)
H5A 0.5200 0.8025 0.0561 0.036*
C6 0.2672 (8) 0.8542 (3) −0.0110 (7) 0.0348 (12)
H6A 0.3205 0.8999 0.0004 0.042*
C7 0.0666 (8) 0.8454 (3) −0.0599 (7) 0.0368 (12)
H7A −0.0131 0.8855 −0.0793 0.044*
C8 −0.0178 (8) 0.7785 (3) −0.0805 (8) 0.0357 (12)
H8A −0.1525 0.7732 −0.1134 0.043*
C8A 0.1054 (7) 0.7188 (3) −0.0504 (7) 0.0283 (10)
O1W 0.2955 (5) 0.4596 (2) −0.2198 (5) 0.0303 (7)
H1W 0.328 (10) 0.463 (4) −0.342 (4) 0.08 (2)*
H2W 0.282 (18) 0.4160 (17) −0.189 (17) 0.20 (6)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ni1 0.0258 (5) 0.0247 (6) 0.0301 (6) −0.0004 (5) −0.0038 (4) −0.0003 (5)
Cl1 0.0330 (6) 0.0362 (7) 0.0327 (6) −0.0058 (5) 0.0008 (4) 0.0007 (5)
O1 0.0234 (15) 0.029 (2) 0.049 (2) −0.0023 (15) −0.0044 (14) −0.0022 (17)
N1 0.0206 (17) 0.035 (2) 0.034 (2) −0.0025 (17) −0.0034 (15) 0.0038 (19)
C2 0.029 (2) 0.031 (3) 0.026 (2) 0.001 (2) 0.0016 (18) 0.002 (2)
N3 0.0273 (19) 0.023 (2) 0.031 (2) −0.0022 (17) 0.0002 (15) 0.0001 (17)
C4 0.031 (2) 0.025 (3) 0.025 (2) 0.001 (2) 0.0043 (18) 0.000 (2)
C4A 0.028 (2) 0.026 (3) 0.026 (2) 0.002 (2) 0.0020 (18) 0.002 (2)
C5 0.036 (2) 0.026 (3) 0.027 (2) −0.001 (2) −0.0003 (19) 0.002 (2)
C6 0.048 (3) 0.028 (3) 0.029 (2) 0.001 (2) 0.000 (2) 0.000 (2)
C7 0.050 (3) 0.032 (3) 0.029 (2) 0.017 (3) 0.002 (2) 0.003 (2)
C8 0.032 (2) 0.040 (3) 0.034 (3) 0.011 (2) −0.002 (2) 0.001 (2)
C8A 0.029 (2) 0.029 (3) 0.027 (2) 0.005 (2) 0.0014 (18) 0.002 (2)
O1W 0.0299 (16) 0.031 (2) 0.0292 (17) −0.0041 (16) −0.0033 (13) −0.0022 (17)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Ni1—O1W 2.084 (3) C4—C4A 1.462 (7)
Ni1—O1Wi 2.084 (3) C4A—C8A 1.402 (6)
Ni1—N3i 2.112 (4) C4A—C5 1.403 (7)
Ni1—N3 2.112 (4) C5—C6 1.362 (7)
Ni1—Cl1 2.4451 (12) C5—H5A 0.9300
Ni1—Cl1i 2.4451 (12) C6—C7 1.387 (7)
O1—C4 1.246 (5) C6—H6A 0.9300
N1—C2 1.317 (6) C7—C8 1.381 (8)
N1—C8A 1.375 (6) C7—H7A 0.9300
N1—H1A 0.8600 C8—C8A 1.402 (7)
C2—N3 1.314 (5) C8—H8A 0.9300
C2—H2A 0.9300 O1W—H1W 0.85 (4)
N3—C4 1.374 (6) O1W—H2W 0.85 (5)
O1W—Ni1—O1Wi 180.0 (2) O1—C4—N3 121.1 (5)
O1W—Ni1—N3i 90.21 (15) O1—C4—C4A 120.5 (5)
O1Wi—Ni1—N3i 89.79 (15) N3—C4—C4A 118.4 (4)
O1W—Ni1—N3 89.79 (15) C8A—C4A—C5 118.8 (5)
O1Wi—Ni1—N3 90.21 (15) C8A—C4A—C4 119.0 (5)
N3i—Ni1—N3 180.0 (2) C5—C4A—C4 122.2 (4)
O1W—Ni1—Cl1 91.05 (11) C6—C5—C4A 120.5 (5)
O1Wi—Ni1—Cl1 88.95 (11) C6—C5—H5A 119.8
N3i—Ni1—Cl1 89.91 (11) C4A—C5—H5A 119.8
N3—Ni1—Cl1 90.09 (11) C5—C6—C7 120.1 (5)
O1W—Ni1—Cl1i 88.95 (11) C5—C6—H6A 119.9
O1Wi—Ni1—Cl1i 91.05 (11) C7—C6—H6A 119.9
N3i—Ni1—Cl1i 90.09 (11) C8—C7—C6 121.6 (5)
N3—Ni1—Cl1i 89.91 (11) C8—C7—H7A 119.2
Cl1—Ni1—Cl1i 180.00 (6) C6—C7—H7A 119.2
C2—N1—C8A 121.4 (4) C7—C8—C8A 118.1 (5)
C2—N1—H1A 119.3 C7—C8—H8A 120.9
C8A—N1—H1A 119.3 C8A—C8—H8A 120.9
N3—C2—N1 125.3 (5) N1—C8A—C8 122.1 (5)
N3—C2—H2A 117.3 N1—C8A—C4A 117.2 (4)
N1—C2—H2A 117.3 C8—C8A—C4A 120.8 (5)
C2—N3—C4 118.7 (4) Ni1—O1W—H1W 115 (5)
C2—N3—Ni1 116.8 (3) Ni1—O1W—H2W 105 (8)
C4—N3—Ni1 124.5 (3) H1W—O1W—H2W 110 (8)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1W—H1W···Cl1ii 0.85 (4) 2.56 (3) 3.371 (4) 160 (6)
O1W—H2W···O1i 0.85 (5) 1.87 (6) 2.641 (5) 150 (11)
N1—H1A···O1iii 0.86 2.44 3.116 (5) 136
N1—H1A···Cl1iv 0.86 2.59 3.256 (4) 135
C2—H2A···O1W 0.93 2.42 2.958 (6) 117

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (ii) x, y, z−1; (iii) x−1, y, z; (iv) −x, −y+1, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HG5221).

References

  1. Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.
  2. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Turgunov, K. & Englert, U. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Turgunov, K., Shomurotova, S., Mukhamedov, N. & Tashkhodjaev, B. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812019381/hg5221sup1.cif

e-68-0m724-sup1.cif (15.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812019381/hg5221Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m724-Isup2.hkl (83.1KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES