Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 May 12;68(Pt 6):m763–m764. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812020259

catena-Poly[[diaqua­nickel(II)]-bis­(μ-2-{[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]sulfan­yl}acetato)]

Ru-Qin Gao a,*, Chao-Hui Xia b, Guo-Ting Li a
PMCID: PMC3379099  PMID: 22719320

Abstract

In the title compound, [Ni(C9H6N3O3S)2(H2O)2]n, the NiII atom, located on an inversion center, is ligated in an octa­hedral geometry by two carboxyl­ate O atoms from two 2-{[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]sulfan­yl}acetate (L) ligands and two O atoms from water mol­ecules in the equatorial plane, and two pyridine N atoms from other two L ligands at the apical sites. Two L ligands bridge pairs of metal atoms in an anti­parallel manner, forming centrosymmetric dinuclear quasi-recta­ngular units which are linked into infinite double-stranded chains parallel to [100]. O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the coordinating water mol­ecules and the carboxyl­ate groups of the L ligand as well as interchain S⋯N inter­actions [2.726 (2)–3.363 (2) Å] lead to the formation of a layer structure parallel to (001).

Related literature  

For coordination polymers of 1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thione, see: Wu et al. (2010); Lundin et al. (2006); Wang et al. (2007). For coordination polymers of symmetric pyridyl-containing oxadiazole ligands, see: Ma et al. (2007); Du et al. (2006). For unsymmetric pyridyl-containing oxadiazole ligands, see: Wang & Li (2011). graphic file with name e-68-0m763-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [Ni(C9H6N3O3S)2(H2O)2]

  • M r = 567.20

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 11.8862 (18) Å

  • b = 5.6431 (9) Å

  • c = 15.500 (2) Å

  • β = 95.687 (2)°

  • V = 1034.5 (3) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.20 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.15 × 0.13 × 0.07 mm

Data collection  

  • Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer

  • 7195 measured reflections

  • 1822 independent reflections

  • 1488 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.034

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.028

  • wR(F 2) = 0.068

  • S = 1.03

  • 1822 reflections

  • 166 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1994); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812020259/zj2075sup1.cif

e-68-0m763-sup1.cif (15.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812020259/zj2075Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m763-Isup2.hkl (89.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Ni1—O2 2.0702 (16)
Ni1—O4 2.0781 (18)
Ni1—N1i 2.1157 (19)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O4—H4A⋯O3 0.82 (1) 1.83 (1) 2.633 (3) 167 (3)
O4—H4B⋯O2ii 0.82 (1) 2.11 (2) 2.857 (3) 153 (3)

Symmetry code: (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

There have been considerable interests in the coordination polymers of 1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thione because of their intriguing architectures (Wu, et al., 2010) and potential applications as functional materials (Lundin, et al., 2006; Wang, et al., 2007). In particular, pyridyl-containing oxadiazole ligands, such as symmetric 5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thione (Ma, et al., 2007) and 5-(4-pyridyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thione (Du, et al., 2006), have been extensively explored in the construction of porous coordination polymers. As our continuous work in this aspect (Wang & Li, 2011), we report that the reaction of NiCl2.6H2O and sodium(I) salt of 2-(5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio)acetic acid (HL) leads to a new complex [Ni(L)2(H2O)2]n (1) herein.

In (1) the NiII center is located at the inversion center ligated by two carboxylato O atoms from two deprotonated L and two O atoms from water molecules in the equatorial plane, and two pyridyl N atoms from other two deprotonated L at the apical sites. Thus the NiII ion is in a six-coordinated octahedral coordination geometry (Fig. 1). The bond distances of Ni—O and Ni—N range from 2.070 (2) to 2.116 (2) Å, while O—Ni—N angles range from 85.90 (7) to 94.10 (7) °, indicating a slight distortion from an ideal octahedron.

Complex (1) displays an extended infinite double-strand chain structure constructed of dinuclear quasi-rectangle units (Fig. 2). The dinuclear quasi-rectangle units are centrosymmetric and formed by two L anions antiparallelly bridging two metal centers in monodentate modes with two nickel atoms and two methylene carbon atoms of the L at the corners and the diagonal Ni···Ni distances of 11.886 (2) Å. As for L, the pyridyl group and the acetate group deviate from the center ring of oxadiazole-2-thione group, with the dihedral angels being 36.0 (7) and 88.5 (7) °, respectively. Notably, the conformation of L is apt to the dinuclear quasi-rectangle which is further stabilized by CH···π stacking interactions between antiparallel the pyridyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol groups of the L in the same rectangle unit with the distances of Hpyridyl to centroid of oxadiazol group being 3.320 (2) Å and 3.353 (2) Å. The chains of complex (1) are connected by O—H···O hydrogen bonds between the coordinated water molecules (as donors) and the carboxylate groups of L (as acceptors), leading to the formation of a two-dimensional network structure (Fig. 2, Table 3). Additionally, the interchain weak interactions between S and N of the oxadiazole-2-thione groups of L stabilize the layer structure (the distances of S···N being in a range of 2.726 (2) to 3.363 (2) Å).

Experimental

For the synthesis of sodium(I) salt of ligand 2-(5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio)acetic acid (HL), see: Wang & Li, (2011). The title compound (1).n(H2O) was prepared according to the following process. A mixture of NaL (51.8 mg, 0.2 mmol), NiCl2.6H2O (23.8 mg, 0.1 mmol) and deionized water (20 ml) was stirred for 30 minutes and then filtered. The filtrate was allowed to evaporate at room temperature for three days, and then green needle crystals were obtain in 72% yield. Selected IR (cm-1, KBr pellet): 3374(m), 3091(w), 2994(w), 1621(m), 1579(s), 1463(s), 1382(s), 1224(m), 1192(m), 1065(m), 958(w), 707(s), 586(w).

Refinement

The H atoms of water were located from difference Fourier maps and included in the final refinement by using geometrical restrains, while the other hydrogen atom positions were generated geometrically and these H atoms were allowed to ride on their parent atoms.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Coordination environment of the nickel atom in (1). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. Symmetry code: (i) -x + 1, -y, -z + 1; (ii) x + 1, y, z; (iii) -x, -y, -z + 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

View of the two-dimensional network structure in (1) formed by interchain S···N interactions and multiple O—H···O hydrogen-bonding interactions

Crystal data

[Ni(C9H6N3O3S)2(H2O)2] F(000) = 580
Mr = 567.20 Dx = 1.821 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -p 2ybc Cell parameters from 1733 reflections
a = 11.8862 (18) Å θ = 2.6–24.8°
b = 5.6431 (9) Å µ = 1.20 mm1
c = 15.500 (2) Å T = 293 K
β = 95.687 (2)° Needle, pale green
V = 1034.5 (3) Å3 0.15 × 0.13 × 0.07 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer 1488 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.034
Graphite monochromator θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6°
ω scan h = −14→13
7195 measured reflections k = −6→6
1822 independent reflections l = −18→18

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.068 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0266P)2 + 0.8247P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1822 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
166 parameters Δρmax = 0.25 e Å3
2 restraints Δρmin = −0.28 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ni1 0.5000 0.0000 0.5000 0.01764 (14)
S1 0.22867 (5) 0.52524 (11) 0.32025 (4) 0.02534 (17)
O1 0.03642 (14) 0.3493 (3) 0.36616 (11) 0.0251 (4)
N1 −0.33708 (16) 0.0597 (4) 0.46039 (13) 0.0214 (5)
C1 −0.3094 (2) 0.2565 (5) 0.41861 (17) 0.0267 (6)
H1 −0.3640 0.3791 0.4099 0.032*
O2 0.42671 (14) 0.2203 (3) 0.40344 (10) 0.0223 (4)
N2 0.04253 (19) −0.0307 (4) 0.33372 (17) 0.0349 (6)
C2 −0.2055 (2) 0.2898 (5) 0.38770 (18) 0.0285 (6)
H2 −0.1895 0.4322 0.3586 0.034*
O3 0.41911 (15) −0.0211 (3) 0.28832 (12) 0.0307 (4)
N3 0.14163 (18) 0.0782 (4) 0.30919 (16) 0.0329 (6)
C3 −0.1253 (2) 0.1121 (5) 0.39981 (16) 0.0227 (6)
O4 0.49432 (15) −0.2945 (3) 0.41919 (12) 0.0258 (4)
C4 −0.1526 (2) −0.0926 (5) 0.44222 (16) 0.0254 (6)
H4 −0.0996 −0.2183 0.4512 0.030*
C5 −0.2588 (2) −0.1107 (5) 0.47130 (16) 0.0229 (6)
H5 −0.2769 −0.2515 0.5005 0.027*
C6 −0.0151 (2) 0.1322 (5) 0.36561 (17) 0.0241 (6)
C7 0.13385 (19) 0.2981 (5) 0.32989 (16) 0.0233 (6)
C8 0.3334 (2) 0.3561 (5) 0.26933 (16) 0.0241 (6)
H8A 0.2953 0.2784 0.2171 0.029*
H8B 0.3895 0.4684 0.2495 0.029*
C9 0.39724 (19) 0.1663 (5) 0.32486 (16) 0.0210 (5)
H4B 0.459 (2) −0.417 (3) 0.4250 (18) 0.032*
H4A 0.470 (2) −0.229 (5) 0.3738 (11) 0.032*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ni1 0.0149 (2) 0.0173 (2) 0.0210 (2) 0.00045 (18) 0.00284 (17) 0.00042 (19)
S1 0.0185 (3) 0.0219 (3) 0.0362 (4) 0.0001 (3) 0.0056 (3) 0.0036 (3)
O1 0.0187 (9) 0.0241 (10) 0.0338 (10) 0.0013 (8) 0.0087 (8) −0.0002 (8)
N1 0.0174 (11) 0.0225 (11) 0.0245 (11) −0.0009 (9) 0.0030 (9) −0.0010 (9)
C1 0.0225 (14) 0.0194 (13) 0.0393 (16) 0.0029 (11) 0.0090 (12) 0.0014 (12)
O2 0.0231 (9) 0.0221 (9) 0.0215 (10) 0.0018 (7) 0.0011 (7) 0.0020 (7)
N2 0.0254 (12) 0.0278 (13) 0.0546 (16) −0.0049 (11) 0.0187 (11) −0.0056 (12)
C2 0.0277 (14) 0.0201 (14) 0.0388 (16) −0.0006 (11) 0.0095 (12) 0.0058 (12)
O3 0.0350 (11) 0.0293 (11) 0.0281 (10) 0.0086 (9) 0.0040 (8) −0.0047 (9)
N3 0.0207 (12) 0.0244 (13) 0.0563 (16) −0.0032 (10) 0.0178 (11) −0.0030 (11)
C3 0.0178 (12) 0.0250 (14) 0.0253 (14) −0.0019 (11) 0.0016 (10) −0.0022 (11)
O4 0.0288 (11) 0.0211 (10) 0.0271 (10) −0.0007 (8) 0.0013 (8) 0.0001 (8)
C4 0.0212 (13) 0.0262 (14) 0.0284 (14) 0.0043 (11) 0.0006 (11) 0.0016 (12)
C5 0.0213 (13) 0.0242 (14) 0.0236 (14) 0.0002 (11) 0.0038 (11) 0.0027 (11)
C6 0.0178 (13) 0.0255 (14) 0.0293 (14) −0.0020 (11) 0.0038 (11) 0.0020 (12)
C7 0.0144 (12) 0.0266 (15) 0.0291 (14) 0.0027 (11) 0.0036 (11) 0.0026 (12)
C8 0.0164 (13) 0.0307 (15) 0.0258 (14) 0.0006 (11) 0.0049 (11) 0.0050 (12)
C9 0.0121 (12) 0.0275 (14) 0.0244 (14) −0.0027 (11) 0.0063 (10) 0.0033 (12)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Ni1—O2i 2.0702 (16) N2—C6 1.275 (3)
Ni1—O2 2.0702 (16) N2—N3 1.414 (3)
Ni1—O4 2.0781 (18) C2—C3 1.384 (3)
Ni1—O4i 2.0781 (18) C2—H2 0.9500
Ni1—N1ii 2.1157 (19) O3—C9 1.239 (3)
Ni1—N1iii 2.1157 (19) N3—C7 1.287 (3)
S1—C7 1.723 (3) C3—C4 1.383 (4)
S1—C8 1.811 (2) C3—C6 1.465 (3)
O1—C7 1.367 (3) O4—H4B 0.816 (10)
O1—C6 1.369 (3) O4—H4A 0.819 (10)
N1—C5 1.337 (3) C4—C5 1.385 (3)
N1—C1 1.343 (3) C4—H4 0.9500
N1—Ni1iv 2.1157 (19) C5—H5 0.9500
C1—C2 1.380 (4) C8—C9 1.528 (3)
C1—H1 0.9500 C8—H8A 0.9900
O2—C9 1.271 (3) C8—H8B 0.9900
O2i—Ni1—O2 180.00 (6) C7—N3—N2 105.6 (2)
O2i—Ni1—O4 86.66 (7) C4—C3—C2 118.6 (2)
O2—Ni1—O4 93.34 (7) C4—C3—C6 119.8 (2)
O2i—Ni1—O4i 93.34 (7) C2—C3—C6 121.6 (2)
O2—Ni1—O4i 86.66 (7) Ni1—O4—H4B 127 (2)
O4—Ni1—O4i 180.0 Ni1—O4—H4A 98 (2)
O2i—Ni1—N1ii 88.50 (7) H4B—O4—H4A 110 (3)
O2—Ni1—N1ii 91.50 (7) C3—C4—C5 118.7 (2)
O4—Ni1—N1ii 85.90 (7) C3—C4—H4 120.6
O4i—Ni1—N1ii 94.10 (7) C5—C4—H4 120.6
O2i—Ni1—N1iii 91.50 (7) N1—C5—C4 123.4 (2)
O2—Ni1—N1iii 88.50 (7) N1—C5—H5 118.3
O4—Ni1—N1iii 94.10 (7) C4—C5—H5 118.3
O4i—Ni1—N1iii 85.90 (7) N2—C6—O1 113.0 (2)
N1ii—Ni1—N1iii 180.0 N2—C6—C3 128.2 (2)
C7—S1—C8 97.45 (12) O1—C6—C3 118.9 (2)
C7—O1—C6 101.82 (19) N3—C7—O1 113.0 (2)
C5—N1—C1 117.0 (2) N3—C7—S1 129.2 (2)
C5—N1—Ni1iv 119.62 (16) O1—C7—S1 117.79 (18)
C1—N1—Ni1iv 123.17 (17) C9—C8—S1 116.64 (17)
N1—C1—C2 123.4 (2) C9—C8—H8A 108.1
N1—C1—H1 118.3 S1—C8—H8A 108.1
C2—C1—H1 118.3 C9—C8—H8B 108.1
C9—O2—Ni1 127.26 (16) S1—C8—H8B 108.1
C6—N2—N3 106.5 (2) H8A—C8—H8B 107.3
C1—C2—C3 118.8 (2) O3—C9—O2 126.3 (2)
C1—C2—H2 120.6 O3—C9—C8 117.1 (2)
C3—C2—H2 120.6 O2—C9—C8 116.5 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) −x, −y, −z+1; (iv) x−1, y, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O4—H4A···O3 0.82 (1) 1.83 (1) 2.633 (3) 167 (3)
O4—H4B···O2v 0.82 (1) 2.11 (2) 2.857 (3) 153 (3)

Symmetry code: (v) x, y−1, z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: ZJ2075).

References

  1. Du, M., Zhang, Z. H., Zhao, X. J. & Xu, Q. (2006). Inorg. Chem. 45, 5785–5792. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Lundin, N. J., Blackman, A. G., Gordon, K. C. & Officer, D. L. (2006). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 2582–2584. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Ma, C., Tian, G. & Zhang, R. (2007). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360, 1762–1766.
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Siemens (1994). SAINT Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  6. Siemens (1996). SMART Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  7. Wang, H.-R. & Li, G.-T. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, m1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, Y. T., Tang, G. M. & Quang, Z. W. (2007). Polyhedron, 26, 4542–4550.
  9. Wu, B. L., Wang, R. Y., Ye, E., Zhang, H. Y. & Hou, H. W. (2010). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 13, 157–159.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812020259/zj2075sup1.cif

e-68-0m763-sup1.cif (15.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812020259/zj2075Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m763-Isup2.hkl (89.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES