Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 May 5;68(Pt 6):o1654. doi: 10.1107/S160053681201971X

3-Methyl­piperidinium bromide

Qian Xu a,*
PMCID: PMC3379253  PMID: 22719451

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title molecular salt, C6H14N+·Br, N—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds link the cations and anions to form a one-dimensional network.

Related literature  

For general background to ferroelectric organic frameworks, see: Ye et al. (2006); Zhang et al. (2008, 2010).graphic file with name e-68-o1654-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C6H14N+·Br

  • M r = 180.09

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 23.134 (5) Å

  • b = 9.997 (2) Å

  • c = 7.7214 (15) Å

  • β = 107.90 (3)°

  • V = 1699.3 (6) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.75 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.55 × 0.44 × 0.36 mm

Data collection  

  • Rigaku Mercury70 CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) T min = 0.134, T max = 0.223

  • 8544 measured reflections

  • 1946 independent reflections

  • 1327 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.057

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.043

  • wR(F 2) = 0.091

  • S = 1.09

  • 1946 reflections

  • 74 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.57 e Å−3

Data collection: SCXmini (Rigaku, 2006); cell refinement: SCXmini; data reduction: SCXmini; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681201971X/ds2192sup1.cif

e-68-o1654-sup1.cif (16.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681201971X/ds2192Isup2.hkl

e-68-o1654-Isup2.hkl (95.9KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681201971X/ds2192Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1D⋯Br1 0.90 2.38 3.273 (3) 175
N1—H1C⋯Br1i 0.90 2.36 3.255 (3) 173

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the starter fund of Southeast University for the purchase of the diffractometer.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Dielectric-ferroelectric constitute an interesting class of materials, comprising organic ligands,metal-organic coordination compounds and organic-inorganic hybrids.(Zhang et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2008;Ye et al., 2006). Unfortunately,the dielectric constant of the title compound as a function of temperature indicates that the permittivity is basically temperature-independent, below the melting point (428k-429k) of the compound, we have found that title compound has no dielectric disuniform from 80 K to 405 K. Herein we descibe the crystal structure of this compound.

Regarding its crystal structure,the asymmetric unit of the title compound consists of a 3-methylpiperidinium cation, a bromide anion (Fig. 1). The cations and anions were connected by hydrogen bonds involving N—H···Br which makes great contribution to the stability of the crystal structure,and these hydrogen bonds link the cations and anions into stable crystal structure (Fig. 2 and Tab. 1).

Experimental

The title compound was obtained by the addition of hydrobromic acid (0.8 g, 0.01 mol) to a solution of 3-methylpiperidine (0.97 g, 0.01 mol) in water, in the stoichiometric ratio 1: 1. Good quality single crystals were obtained by slow evaporation after two days(the chemical yield is 65%).

Refinement

Amino H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined isotropically. Other H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions nd constrained to ride on their parent atoms with C—H = 0.97–0.98 Å, Uiso(H) = 1.2Uiso(C, N) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Uiso(C) for the methyl.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound, with the atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. The dashed line indicate intramolecular hydrogen bond.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A view of the packing of the title compound, stacking along the a axis. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.

Crystal data

C6H14N+·Br F(000) = 736
Mr = 180.09 Dx = 1.408 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 1946 reflections
a = 23.134 (5) Å θ = 3.0–27.5°
b = 9.997 (2) Å µ = 4.75 mm1
c = 7.7214 (15) Å T = 293 K
β = 107.90 (3)° Block, colorless
V = 1699.3 (6) Å3 0.55 × 0.44 × 0.36 mm
Z = 8

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury70 CCD diffractometer 1946 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1327 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.057
ω scans θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) h = −30→30
Tmin = 0.134, Tmax = 0.223 k = −12→12
8544 measured reflections l = −10→10

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.091 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.035P)2 + 0.5231P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1946 reflections Δρmax = 0.37 e Å3
74 parameters Δρmin = −0.57 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 0.11379 (15) 0.3573 (3) 0.1464 (4) 0.0570 (9)
H1C 0.1188 0.4456 0.1332 0.068*
H1D 0.1141 0.3431 0.2618 0.068*
C1 0.16511 (17) 0.2840 (4) 0.1151 (5) 0.0513 (9)
H1A 0.2027 0.3117 0.2043 0.062*
H1B 0.1676 0.3057 −0.0048 0.062*
C2 0.15735 (16) 0.1344 (3) 0.1290 (5) 0.0468 (9)
H2 0.1575 0.1135 0.2531 0.056*
C3 0.09709 (15) 0.0903 (4) −0.0014 (5) 0.0523 (9)
H3A 0.0916 −0.0047 0.0134 0.063*
H3B 0.0969 0.1057 −0.1256 0.063*
C4 0.04502 (18) 0.1672 (4) 0.0339 (6) 0.0634 (11)
H4A 0.0070 0.1406 −0.0543 0.076*
H4B 0.0430 0.1456 0.1543 0.076*
C5 0.05371 (18) 0.3159 (4) 0.0204 (6) 0.0641 (11)
H5A 0.0514 0.3390 −0.1036 0.077*
H5B 0.0216 0.3632 0.0511 0.077*
C6 0.21027 (17) 0.0600 (4) 0.0926 (6) 0.0775 (13)
H6A 0.2043 −0.0346 0.0993 0.116*
H6B 0.2476 0.0854 0.1821 0.116*
H6C 0.2120 0.0827 −0.0265 0.116*
Br1 0.120008 (18) 0.32311 (4) 0.57328 (5) 0.05608 (17)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.091 (3) 0.0367 (17) 0.0462 (18) −0.0022 (16) 0.0255 (17) 0.0003 (15)
C1 0.054 (2) 0.049 (2) 0.047 (2) −0.0167 (18) 0.0104 (18) −0.0017 (18)
C2 0.053 (2) 0.0416 (19) 0.045 (2) −0.0015 (17) 0.0131 (17) 0.0016 (17)
C3 0.053 (2) 0.040 (2) 0.061 (2) −0.0077 (17) 0.0138 (19) −0.0038 (19)
C4 0.052 (2) 0.053 (2) 0.085 (3) −0.0089 (19) 0.020 (2) 0.004 (2)
C5 0.061 (3) 0.055 (2) 0.074 (3) 0.007 (2) 0.017 (2) 0.006 (2)
C6 0.059 (3) 0.080 (3) 0.090 (3) 0.002 (2) 0.017 (2) −0.009 (3)
Br1 0.0834 (3) 0.0399 (2) 0.0459 (2) −0.00318 (19) 0.0213 (2) −0.00200 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

N1—C1 1.477 (5) C3—H3A 0.9700
N1—C5 1.490 (5) C3—H3B 0.9700
N1—H1C 0.9000 C4—C5 1.507 (5)
N1—H1D 0.9000 C4—H4A 0.9700
C1—C2 1.514 (5) C4—H4B 0.9700
C1—H1A 0.9700 C5—H5A 0.9700
C1—H1B 0.9700 C5—H5B 0.9700
C2—C3 1.512 (5) C6—H6A 0.9600
C2—C6 1.530 (5) C6—H6B 0.9600
C2—H2 0.9800 C6—H6C 0.9600
C3—C4 1.523 (5)
C1—N1—C5 113.0 (3) C2—C3—H3B 109.5
C1—N1—H1C 109.3 C4—C3—H3B 109.5
C5—N1—H1C 109.0 H3A—C3—H3B 108.1
C1—N1—H1D 108.7 C5—C4—C3 110.8 (3)
C5—N1—H1D 109.0 C5—C4—H4A 109.5
H1C—N1—H1D 107.8 C3—C4—H4A 109.5
N1—C1—C2 111.1 (3) C5—C4—H4B 109.5
N1—C1—H1A 109.4 C3—C4—H4B 109.5
C2—C1—H1A 109.4 H4A—C4—H4B 108.1
N1—C1—H1B 109.4 N1—C5—C4 110.3 (3)
C2—C1—H1B 109.4 N1—C5—H5A 109.6
H1A—C1—H1B 108.0 C4—C5—H5A 109.6
C3—C2—C1 110.2 (3) N1—C5—H5B 109.6
C3—C2—C6 111.2 (3) C4—C5—H5B 109.6
C1—C2—C6 110.4 (3) H5A—C5—H5B 108.1
C3—C2—H2 108.3 C2—C6—H6A 109.5
C1—C2—H2 108.3 C2—C6—H6B 109.5
C6—C2—H2 108.3 H6A—C6—H6B 109.5
C2—C3—C4 110.6 (3) C2—C6—H6C 109.5
C2—C3—H3A 109.5 H6A—C6—H6C 109.5
C4—C3—H3A 109.5 H6B—C6—H6C 109.5
C5—N1—C1—C2 −56.3 (4) C6—C2—C3—C4 −178.8 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C3 55.7 (4) C2—C3—C4—C5 56.6 (5)
N1—C1—C2—C6 178.9 (3) C1—N1—C5—C4 56.1 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −56.1 (4) C3—C4—C5—N1 −55.5 (5)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1D···Br1 0.90 2.38 3.273 (3) 175
N1—H1C···Br1i 0.90 2.36 3.255 (3) 173

Symmetry code: (i) x, −y+1, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: DS2192).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Rigaku (2006). SCXmini Rigaku Americas Corporation, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Ye, Q., Song, Y.-M., Wang, G.-X., Chen, K. & Fu, D.-W. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6554–6555. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, W., Xiong, R.-G. & Huang, S.-P. D. (2008). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10468–10469. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, W., Ye, H.-Y., Cai, H.-L., Ge, J.-Z. & Xiong, R.-G. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7300–7302. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681201971X/ds2192sup1.cif

e-68-o1654-sup1.cif (16.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681201971X/ds2192Isup2.hkl

e-68-o1654-Isup2.hkl (95.9KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681201971X/ds2192Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES