Abstract
In the title compound, C3H5N2 +·C2HO4 −, the anions form centrosymmetric dimers through cyclic O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding associations [graph set R 2 2(10)]. These dimers are then linked through a cyclic R 4 2(10) N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding association involving two cations and the carboxyl O-atom acceptors of separate anions, giving chain structures extending across the (111) plane.
Related literature
For general background to ferroelectric organic frameworks, see: Fu et al. (2009 ▶); Ye et al. (2006 ▶); Zhang et al. (2008 ▶, 2010 ▶). For graph-set analysis, see: Etter et al. (1990 ▶).
Experimental
Crystal data
C3H5N2 +·C2HO4 −
M r = 158.12
Triclinic,
a = 3.7286 (7) Å
b = 9.836 (2) Å
c = 10.487 (2) Å
α = 117.35 (3)°
β = 97.01 (3)°
γ = 93.65 (3)°
V = 335.92 (14) Å3
Z = 2
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 0.14 mm−1
T = 293 K
0.26 × 0.22 × 0.14 mm
Data collection
Rigaku SCXmini CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.965, T max = 0.993
3484 measured reflections
1527 independent reflections
702 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R int = 0.063
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.095
wR(F 2) = 0.285
S = 1.07
1527 reflections
101 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supplementary Material
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209Isup2.hkl
Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209Isup3.cml
Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).
| D—H⋯A | D—H | H⋯A | D⋯A | D—H⋯A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1—H1A⋯O1i | 0.86 | 1.86 | 2.709 (5) | 170 |
| N2—H2A⋯O1ii | 0.86 | 1.92 | 2.715 (5) | 153 |
| O4—H4⋯O3iii | 0.82 | 1.95 | 2.679 (5) | 147 |
Symmetry codes: (i)
; (ii)
; (iii)
.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Southeast University.
supplementary crystallographic information
Comment
As a contribution to a search for new ferroelectric materials (Fu et al., 2009; Ye et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2008, 2010), we have synthesized the title salt, C3H5N2+. C2HO4- from a 1:1 stoichiometric reaction of pyrazole with oxalic acid and the structure is reported here.
In the structure of the title compound (Fig.1) the molecules are organized in a one-dimensional chain structure involving both inter-anionic and cation–anion hydrogen-bonding associations (Table 1). The anions form centrosymmetric dimers through cyclic O—H···O hydrogen-bonding associations [graph set R22(10) (Etter et al., 1990)]. These dimers are then linked through a cyclic R24(10) N—H···O hydrogen-bonding association involving two cations and the carboxyl O-atom acceptors of separate anions, giving one-dimensional chain structures extending across the (111) plane (Fig. 2).
Experimental
A mixture of pyrazole (0.68 g, 10 mmol) and oxalic acid (0.95 g, 10 mmol) in water was stirred for several days at ambient temperature. Colourless crystal plates of the title compound suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained.
Refinement
Hydrogen atom positions were calculated and allowed to ride on their parent atoms with aromatic C—H = 0.93 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å and O—H = 0.82 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C or N) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).
Figures
Fig. 1.
The molecular structure and atom-numbering scheme for the title compound, with the displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.
Fig. 2.
The packing of the title compound in the unit cell viewed down the a axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
Crystal data
| C3H5N2+·C2HO4− | Z = 2 |
| Mr = 158.12 | F(000) = 164 |
| Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.563 Mg m−3 |
| Hall symbol: -P 1 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| a = 3.7286 (7) Å | Cell parameters from 1527 reflections |
| b = 9.836 (2) Å | θ = 2.4–27.5° |
| c = 10.487 (2) Å | µ = 0.14 mm−1 |
| α = 117.35 (3)° | T = 293 K |
| β = 97.01 (3)° | Sheet, colourless |
| γ = 93.65 (3)° | 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.14 mm |
| V = 335.92 (14) Å3 |
Data collection
| Rigaku SCXmini CCD diffractometer | 1527 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 702 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.063 |
| CCD_Profile_fitting scans | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.9° |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) | h = −4→4 |
| Tmin = 0.965, Tmax = 0.993 | k = −12→12 |
| 3484 measured reflections | l = −13→13 |
Refinement
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.095 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| wR(F2) = 0.285 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| S = 1.07 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1349P)2 + 0.0952P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| 1527 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
| 101 parameters | Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3 |
| 0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 |
Special details
| Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
| Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| N1 | 1.0872 (11) | 0.0136 (5) | 0.3057 (4) | 0.0416 (11) | |
| H1A | 1.1595 | −0.0585 | 0.3230 | 0.050* | |
| N2 | 1.1523 (11) | 0.1643 (5) | 0.3992 (4) | 0.0412 (11) | |
| H2A | 1.2729 | 0.2054 | 0.4865 | 0.049* | |
| C1 | 0.9992 (15) | 0.2395 (6) | 0.3352 (6) | 0.0493 (15) | |
| H1 | 1.0047 | 0.3461 | 0.3773 | 0.059* | |
| C2 | 0.8307 (15) | 0.1355 (7) | 0.1967 (6) | 0.0505 (15) | |
| H2 | 0.7020 | 0.1567 | 0.1277 | 0.061* | |
| C3 | 0.8931 (15) | −0.0076 (7) | 0.1818 (6) | 0.0477 (14) | |
| H3 | 0.8131 | −0.1021 | 0.0993 | 0.057* | |
| O1 | 0.3997 (10) | 0.8001 (4) | 0.3600 (3) | 0.0475 (10) | |
| O2 | 0.6353 (11) | 0.5351 (4) | 0.3418 (4) | 0.0577 (12) | |
| O3 | 0.0807 (11) | 0.6588 (4) | 0.1355 (4) | 0.0581 (11) | |
| O4 | 0.3270 (11) | 0.4012 (4) | 0.1179 (4) | 0.0554 (11) | |
| H4 | 0.1905 | 0.4187 | 0.0612 | 0.083* | |
| C4 | 0.2907 (14) | 0.6762 (6) | 0.2446 (5) | 0.0402 (13) | |
| C5 | 0.4374 (14) | 0.5304 (6) | 0.2400 (5) | 0.0425 (13) |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| N1 | 0.049 (3) | 0.033 (2) | 0.041 (2) | 0.0045 (19) | −0.0029 (19) | 0.019 (2) |
| N2 | 0.048 (3) | 0.034 (2) | 0.031 (2) | 0.005 (2) | −0.0023 (19) | 0.0087 (19) |
| C1 | 0.053 (3) | 0.045 (3) | 0.056 (4) | 0.011 (3) | 0.006 (3) | 0.029 (3) |
| C2 | 0.053 (4) | 0.052 (4) | 0.048 (3) | 0.010 (3) | −0.002 (3) | 0.027 (3) |
| C3 | 0.047 (3) | 0.042 (3) | 0.041 (3) | 0.004 (2) | −0.006 (2) | 0.011 (3) |
| O1 | 0.062 (2) | 0.033 (2) | 0.037 (2) | 0.0087 (17) | −0.0074 (17) | 0.0110 (18) |
| O2 | 0.076 (3) | 0.043 (2) | 0.045 (2) | 0.0122 (19) | −0.0127 (19) | 0.018 (2) |
| O3 | 0.077 (3) | 0.042 (2) | 0.044 (2) | 0.0123 (19) | −0.0126 (19) | 0.0155 (19) |
| O4 | 0.075 (3) | 0.032 (2) | 0.045 (2) | 0.0098 (19) | −0.0082 (19) | 0.0113 (19) |
| C4 | 0.047 (3) | 0.032 (3) | 0.035 (3) | 0.005 (2) | 0.005 (2) | 0.011 (2) |
| C5 | 0.050 (3) | 0.033 (3) | 0.039 (3) | 0.003 (2) | 0.004 (3) | 0.013 (3) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
| N1—C3 | 1.325 (6) | C2—H2 | 0.9300 |
| N1—N2 | 1.333 (5) | C3—H3 | 0.9300 |
| N1—H1A | 0.8601 | O1—C4 | 1.256 (6) |
| N2—C1 | 1.319 (6) | O2—C5 | 1.202 (6) |
| N2—H2A | 0.8600 | O3—C4 | 1.239 (6) |
| C1—C2 | 1.372 (7) | O4—C5 | 1.317 (6) |
| C1—H1 | 0.9300 | O4—H4 | 0.8200 |
| C2—C3 | 1.380 (8) | C4—C5 | 1.549 (7) |
| C3—N1—N2 | 109.3 (4) | C3—C2—H2 | 127.4 |
| C3—N1—H1A | 125.3 | N1—C3—C2 | 108.0 (5) |
| N2—N1—H1A | 125.4 | N1—C3—H3 | 126.0 |
| C1—N2—N1 | 108.4 (4) | C2—C3—H3 | 126.0 |
| C1—N2—H2A | 125.8 | C5—O4—H4 | 109.5 |
| N1—N2—H2A | 125.8 | O3—C4—O1 | 127.0 (5) |
| N2—C1—C2 | 109.1 (5) | O3—C4—C5 | 117.3 (4) |
| N2—C1—H1 | 125.4 | O1—C4—C5 | 115.7 (4) |
| C2—C1—H1 | 125.4 | O2—C5—O4 | 122.4 (5) |
| C1—C2—C3 | 105.2 (5) | O2—C5—C4 | 122.1 (5) |
| C1—C2—H2 | 127.4 | O4—C5—C4 | 115.4 (4) |
| C3—N1—N2—C1 | 0.1 (6) | O3—C4—C5—O2 | −178.2 (5) |
| N1—N2—C1—C2 | 0.0 (6) | O1—C4—C5—O2 | 1.9 (8) |
| N2—C1—C2—C3 | 0.0 (6) | O3—C4—C5—O4 | 1.0 (7) |
| N2—N1—C3—C2 | −0.1 (6) | O1—C4—C5—O4 | −178.9 (4) |
| C1—C2—C3—N1 | 0.1 (6) |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| N1—H1A···O1i | 0.86 | 1.86 | 2.709 (5) | 170 |
| N2—H2A···O1ii | 0.86 | 1.92 | 2.715 (5) | 153 |
| O4—H4···O3iii | 0.82 | 1.95 | 2.679 (5) | 147 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y−1, z; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z.
Footnotes
Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: ZS2209).
References
- Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
- Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994–997.
- Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Ye, Q., Song, Y.-M., Wang, G.-X., Chen, K. & Fu, D.-W. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6554–6555. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Zhang, W., Xiong, R.-G. & Huang, S.-P. D. (2008). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10468–10469. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Zhang, W., Ye, H.-Y., Cai, H.-L., Ge, J.-Z. & Xiong, R.-G. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7300–7302. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209Isup2.hkl
Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209Isup3.cml
Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


