Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 May 26;68(Pt 6):o1911. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812023136

1H-Pyrazol-2-ium hydrogen oxalate

Chun-Hua Yu a,*, Run-Qiang Zhu a
PMCID: PMC3379467  PMID: 22719665

Abstract

In the title compound, C3H5N2 +·C2HO4 , the anions form centrosymmetric dimers through cyclic O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding associations [graph set R 2 2(10)]. These dimers are then linked through a cyclic R 4 2(10) N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding association involving two cations and the carboxyl O-atom acceptors of separate anions, giving chain structures extending across the (111) plane.

Related literature  

For general background to ferroelectric organic frameworks, see: Fu et al. (2009); Ye et al. (2006); Zhang et al. (2008, 2010). For graph-set analysis, see: Etter et al. (1990).graphic file with name e-68-o1911-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C3H5N2 +·C2HO4

  • M r = 158.12

  • Triclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 3.7286 (7) Å

  • b = 9.836 (2) Å

  • c = 10.487 (2) Å

  • α = 117.35 (3)°

  • β = 97.01 (3)°

  • γ = 93.65 (3)°

  • V = 335.92 (14) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.14 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.14 mm

Data collection  

  • Rigaku SCXmini CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) T min = 0.965, T max = 0.993

  • 3484 measured reflections

  • 1527 independent reflections

  • 702 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.063

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.095

  • wR(F 2) = 0.285

  • S = 1.07

  • 1527 reflections

  • 101 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209sup1.cif

e-68-o1911-sup1.cif (15.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209Isup2.hkl

e-68-o1911-Isup2.hkl (75.3KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i 0.86 1.86 2.709 (5) 170
N2—H2A⋯O1ii 0.86 1.92 2.715 (5) 153
O4—H4⋯O3iii 0.82 1.95 2.679 (5) 147

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Southeast University.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

As a contribution to a search for new ferroelectric materials (Fu et al., 2009; Ye et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2008, 2010), we have synthesized the title salt, C3H5N2+. C2HO4- from a 1:1 stoichiometric reaction of pyrazole with oxalic acid and the structure is reported here.

In the structure of the title compound (Fig.1) the molecules are organized in a one-dimensional chain structure involving both inter-anionic and cation–anion hydrogen-bonding associations (Table 1). The anions form centrosymmetric dimers through cyclic O—H···O hydrogen-bonding associations [graph set R22(10) (Etter et al., 1990)]. These dimers are then linked through a cyclic R24(10) N—H···O hydrogen-bonding association involving two cations and the carboxyl O-atom acceptors of separate anions, giving one-dimensional chain structures extending across the (111) plane (Fig. 2).

Experimental

A mixture of pyrazole (0.68 g, 10 mmol) and oxalic acid (0.95 g, 10 mmol) in water was stirred for several days at ambient temperature. Colourless crystal plates of the title compound suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained.

Refinement

Hydrogen atom positions were calculated and allowed to ride on their parent atoms with aromatic C—H = 0.93 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å and O—H = 0.82 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C or N) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure and atom-numbering scheme for the title compound, with the displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The packing of the title compound in the unit cell viewed down the a axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Crystal data

C3H5N2+·C2HO4 Z = 2
Mr = 158.12 F(000) = 164
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.563 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 3.7286 (7) Å Cell parameters from 1527 reflections
b = 9.836 (2) Å θ = 2.4–27.5°
c = 10.487 (2) Å µ = 0.14 mm1
α = 117.35 (3)° T = 293 K
β = 97.01 (3)° Sheet, colourless
γ = 93.65 (3)° 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.14 mm
V = 335.92 (14) Å3

Data collection

Rigaku SCXmini CCD diffractometer 1527 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 702 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.063
CCD_Profile_fitting scans θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) h = −4→4
Tmin = 0.965, Tmax = 0.993 k = −12→12
3484 measured reflections l = −13→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.095 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.285 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1349P)2 + 0.0952P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1527 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
101 parameters Δρmax = 0.48 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.29 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 1.0872 (11) 0.0136 (5) 0.3057 (4) 0.0416 (11)
H1A 1.1595 −0.0585 0.3230 0.050*
N2 1.1523 (11) 0.1643 (5) 0.3992 (4) 0.0412 (11)
H2A 1.2729 0.2054 0.4865 0.049*
C1 0.9992 (15) 0.2395 (6) 0.3352 (6) 0.0493 (15)
H1 1.0047 0.3461 0.3773 0.059*
C2 0.8307 (15) 0.1355 (7) 0.1967 (6) 0.0505 (15)
H2 0.7020 0.1567 0.1277 0.061*
C3 0.8931 (15) −0.0076 (7) 0.1818 (6) 0.0477 (14)
H3 0.8131 −0.1021 0.0993 0.057*
O1 0.3997 (10) 0.8001 (4) 0.3600 (3) 0.0475 (10)
O2 0.6353 (11) 0.5351 (4) 0.3418 (4) 0.0577 (12)
O3 0.0807 (11) 0.6588 (4) 0.1355 (4) 0.0581 (11)
O4 0.3270 (11) 0.4012 (4) 0.1179 (4) 0.0554 (11)
H4 0.1905 0.4187 0.0612 0.083*
C4 0.2907 (14) 0.6762 (6) 0.2446 (5) 0.0402 (13)
C5 0.4374 (14) 0.5304 (6) 0.2400 (5) 0.0425 (13)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.049 (3) 0.033 (2) 0.041 (2) 0.0045 (19) −0.0029 (19) 0.019 (2)
N2 0.048 (3) 0.034 (2) 0.031 (2) 0.005 (2) −0.0023 (19) 0.0087 (19)
C1 0.053 (3) 0.045 (3) 0.056 (4) 0.011 (3) 0.006 (3) 0.029 (3)
C2 0.053 (4) 0.052 (4) 0.048 (3) 0.010 (3) −0.002 (3) 0.027 (3)
C3 0.047 (3) 0.042 (3) 0.041 (3) 0.004 (2) −0.006 (2) 0.011 (3)
O1 0.062 (2) 0.033 (2) 0.037 (2) 0.0087 (17) −0.0074 (17) 0.0110 (18)
O2 0.076 (3) 0.043 (2) 0.045 (2) 0.0122 (19) −0.0127 (19) 0.018 (2)
O3 0.077 (3) 0.042 (2) 0.044 (2) 0.0123 (19) −0.0126 (19) 0.0155 (19)
O4 0.075 (3) 0.032 (2) 0.045 (2) 0.0098 (19) −0.0082 (19) 0.0113 (19)
C4 0.047 (3) 0.032 (3) 0.035 (3) 0.005 (2) 0.005 (2) 0.011 (2)
C5 0.050 (3) 0.033 (3) 0.039 (3) 0.003 (2) 0.004 (3) 0.013 (3)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

N1—C3 1.325 (6) C2—H2 0.9300
N1—N2 1.333 (5) C3—H3 0.9300
N1—H1A 0.8601 O1—C4 1.256 (6)
N2—C1 1.319 (6) O2—C5 1.202 (6)
N2—H2A 0.8600 O3—C4 1.239 (6)
C1—C2 1.372 (7) O4—C5 1.317 (6)
C1—H1 0.9300 O4—H4 0.8200
C2—C3 1.380 (8) C4—C5 1.549 (7)
C3—N1—N2 109.3 (4) C3—C2—H2 127.4
C3—N1—H1A 125.3 N1—C3—C2 108.0 (5)
N2—N1—H1A 125.4 N1—C3—H3 126.0
C1—N2—N1 108.4 (4) C2—C3—H3 126.0
C1—N2—H2A 125.8 C5—O4—H4 109.5
N1—N2—H2A 125.8 O3—C4—O1 127.0 (5)
N2—C1—C2 109.1 (5) O3—C4—C5 117.3 (4)
N2—C1—H1 125.4 O1—C4—C5 115.7 (4)
C2—C1—H1 125.4 O2—C5—O4 122.4 (5)
C1—C2—C3 105.2 (5) O2—C5—C4 122.1 (5)
C1—C2—H2 127.4 O4—C5—C4 115.4 (4)
C3—N1—N2—C1 0.1 (6) O3—C4—C5—O2 −178.2 (5)
N1—N2—C1—C2 0.0 (6) O1—C4—C5—O2 1.9 (8)
N2—C1—C2—C3 0.0 (6) O3—C4—C5—O4 1.0 (7)
N2—N1—C3—C2 −0.1 (6) O1—C4—C5—O4 −178.9 (4)
C1—C2—C3—N1 0.1 (6)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i 0.86 1.86 2.709 (5) 170
N2—H2A···O1ii 0.86 1.92 2.715 (5) 153
O4—H4···O3iii 0.82 1.95 2.679 (5) 147

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y−1, z; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: ZS2209).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994–997.
  4. Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Ye, Q., Song, Y.-M., Wang, G.-X., Chen, K. & Fu, D.-W. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6554–6555. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, W., Xiong, R.-G. & Huang, S.-P. D. (2008). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10468–10469. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, W., Ye, H.-Y., Cai, H.-L., Ge, J.-Z. & Xiong, R.-G. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7300–7302. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209sup1.cif

e-68-o1911-sup1.cif (15.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209Isup2.hkl

e-68-o1911-Isup2.hkl (75.3KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023136/zs2209Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES