Abstract
The effects of acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) and four combinations of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the reproduction of a tobacco cyst nematode, Globodera tabacum solanacearum, and growth of Nicotiana tabacum (cv. K326 and Xanthi) were tested under greenhouse and field conditions. The PGPR included combinations of Bacillus subtilis A13 with B. pumilis INR7, B. pumilis SE34, B. licheniformis IN937b, or B. amyloliquefaciens IN937a, respectively. Among the four rhizobacterial combinations, IN937a + A13 exhibited the most consistent reduction in G. t. solanacearum cysts under greenhouse and field conditions. No undesirable effects of IN937a + A13 were observed on tobacco growth under greenhouse and field conditions. Use of INR7 + A13 reduced G. t. solanacearum reproduction on flue-cured tobacco cv. K326 but not on oriental tobacco cv. Xanthi. Application of ASM reduced final numbers of G. t. solanacearum cysts, but also resulted in phytotoxicity mainly under the greenhouse conditions. When oriental tobacco seedlings were pre-grown in a IN937a + A13-treated soil-less medium, a single application of ASM at 200 mg/L one week after transplanting significantly reduced G. t. solanacearum reproduction in the field.
Keywords: biological control, induced resistance, management, oriental tobacco
Production of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) in Virginia is significantly affected by Globodera tabacum solanacearum (Miller and Gray, 1972) Behrens, 1975 (Miller and Gray, 1972; Johnson, 1998), the tobacco cyst nematode. Approximately 37% of Virginia's flue-cured tobacco fields are in counties commonly infested with G. t. solanacearum (C.S. Johnson, unpub. data). G. t. solanacearum is also reported to occur in North Carolina and Maryland in the USA, and in Japan, Argentina, Mexico, France, Morocco, and Spain (Johnson et al., 2005; Sumiya et al., 2002). Symptoms caused by G. t. solanacearum include cysts attached to the root surface, and stunting of roots and shoots. Severe infestation can cause significant crop loss by reducing leaf weight and quality (LaMondia, 1988; Johnson et al., 2005). Flue-cured tobacco yield reduction and pesticide expenses due to G. t. solanacearum were approximately 2 million dollars in Virginia alone during the year 2007 (C. S. Johnson, unpub. data). Current G. t. solanacearum management practices include nematicide application, resistant cultivars, and cultural practices. Preplant soil fumigation with expensive and toxic fumigant nematicides such as chloropicrin, metam sodium and 1,3-dichloropropene, or application of the non-fumigant nematicide, aldicarb, are recommended to tobacco growers to reduce the nematode populations to below the damage threshold (Johnson, 2008). However, most fumigant and non-fumigant nematicides pose severe health and environmental risks due to their hazardous active ingredients, and fumigant use has declined due to costs and regulatory requirements (LaMondia, 2008; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008). Cultural practices, such as crop rotation, destruction of tobacco roots after harvest, and deep plowing, help to reduce nematode inoculum level for the next cropping season (LaMondia, 2008). Economic and agronomic considerations frequently limit effective use of cultural practices and resistant cultivars in G. t. solanacearum management, so that tobacco producers routinely apply nematicides in G. t. solanacearum -infested fields. Therefore, more environmentally friendly, durable, and effective management is desirable.
Plants defend themselves against fungi, bacteria, viruses, nematodes, and insects through metabolic, biochemical, and molecular defenses, as well as physical and structural barriers (Hammerschmidt, 2007). Plant defense mechanisms can be either preformed (passive or basal) or induced (active) (Huang, 1998). Constitutive resistance includes naturally occurring secondary plant metabolites or physical barriers. In contrast, induced resistance occurs when a plant recognizes invading pathogens and initiates defense reactions (Zacheo et al., 1997). Application of biotic or abiotic elicitors triggers induced resistance in plants, and such resistance may be categorized as systemic acquired (SAR) or induced systemic (ISR) resistance (Pieterse and Van Loon, 2007). Some soil-inhabiting, non-necrotizing, and non-pathogenic bacteria indigenous to the plant rhizosphere are capable of improving plant growth and vigor (Ryu et al., 2004). Collectively referred to as plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), they are often comprised of gram-negative Pseudomonas spp. or gram-positive Bacillus spp. Successful root colonization by a number of PGPR strains not only improve plant growth and vigor, but also trigger host defense mechanisms (Ryu et al., 2004). Several strains of PGPR have been shown to induce systemic resistance (ISR) to foliar diseases in cucumber, tobacco, arabidopsis, radish, and tomato (Park and Kloepper, 2000; Van Loon et al., 1998). This systemic resistance depends on the host genotype (Van Loon et al., 1998) and does not have any known toxic side effects.
Acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM), commercially available as ACTIGARD (Syngenta Crop Protection, Greensboro, NC) in the USA, is a novel SAR elicitor released in 2000 that belongs to the benzothiadiazole group (Syngenta Crop Protection, 2001). ASM is a synthetic functional analogue of salicylic acid that induces SAR within 4-5 d in many crops, including tobacco (Mandal et al., 2008). The SAR induced by ASM confers broad-spectrum resistance to fungi, bacteria, and viruses (Mandal et al., 2008; Syngenta Crop Protection, 2001). The product is registered in the United States for control of tomato spotted wilt (Tomato spotted wilt virus) and blue mold (Peronospora tabacina Adam.) of tobacco, downy mildew (Peronospora spp.) of leafy vegetables, and bacterial leaf spot (Xanthomonas vesicatoria (Doidge) Dowson) and leaf speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato (Okabe) Young, Dye & Wilkie) of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) (Syngenta Crop Protection, 2001). Our research objectives were to evaluate the potential influence of an SAR inducer (ASM) and four mixtures of PGPR (Bacillus spp.) on G. t. solanacearum reproduction and plant growth.
Materials and Methods
Greenhouse experiments: Greenhouse experiments were conducted in 2005 and 2006 at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, VA. Independent experiments were conducted for G. t. solanacearum-susceptible cultivars of oriental (cv. Xanthi) and flue-cured (cv. K326) tobacco. Each experiment was repeated once. A randomized complete block experimental design was used in each experiment with six replications of the following six treatments: untreated control, ASM, and the following four mixtures of PGPR strains: combinations of Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn A13 with B. pumilus Meyer and Gottheil INR-7, B. pumilus SE34, B. licheniformis (Weigmann) Chester IN937b, or B. amyloliquifaciens (ex Fukumoto) Priest et al. IN937a, respectively.
Seedling preparation and transplanting: Seeds of Xanthi were germinated in a soil-less plant growth medium (Carolina Choice Tobacco Mix, Carolina Soil Company, Kinston, NC, USA) and maintained by applying a 150 ppm N liquid nutrient solution prepared from a 16:5:16 NPK water-soluble fertilizer (ULTRASOL, SQM North America, Atlanta, GA, USA). Four weeks after seeding, individual equal-sized plants were transplanted into 15.2-cm-diam. clay pots filled with a mixture of 666 cm3 steam-sterilized topsoil and 333 cm3 PROFILE porous ceramic, greens grade, soil conditioner (Profile Products LLC, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Media in each pot was fertilized every 10 d with 150 ml of a 200 ppm nitrogen, 62.5 ppm phosphorus, 200 ppm potassium solution prepared using a 16:5:16 NPK water-soluble fertilizer. Five grams of slow release fertilizer (OSMOCOTE 14:14:14 NPK) was also applied to each pot just after transplanting. Plants were watered uniformly from above as needed to maintain moisture content.
Source and application methods of inducers: PGPR mixtures were obtained from Gustafson LLC and Bayer CropScience (Research Triangle Park, NC). Bacteria were formulated on a dry flake carrier to achieve a bacterial concentration of 3x109cfu/g. Prior to filling pots, each of the PGPR formulations was mixed separately with a topsoil:Profile mixture at a rate of 593.5 g per cubic meter of mixture, to obtain 0.6 g of product per pot (1000 cm3 soil) or 1.8x109 cfu/pot. ASM was applied as a foliar spray of 200 mg/L water to run-off, every 10 d, for 11 weeks after transplanting, for a total of seven sprays. The average quantity of ASM applied in each of the seven sprays was 0.5, 2, 4, 4, 10, 10, and 10 mg/plant respectively, equivalent to 20.25 g a.i./1,000 plants.
Nematode inoculum preparation and infestation: Stock populations of G. t. solanacearum were maintained continuously on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Rutgers) in greenhouse culture. The G. t. solanacearum population was transferred to new plants approximately every 90 d. Cysts were extracted using a modified Fenwick can and crushed in a blender for one minute to release eggs (Shepherd, 1986). Contents of the blender were passed through a 150 μm sieve nested over a 25 μm sieve. Eggs retained on the 25 μm sieve were diluted to 500 eggs/ml with tap water. Ten milliliters of the nematode egg suspension, containing approximately 5,000 eggs, were added to each pot one week after transplanting. Each pot was infested by adding inoculum to three 1-cm wide by 2.5-cm deep holes spaced 3-cm apart at the base of the plant stem. Holes were filled with soil immediately after infestation and watered lightly from above.
Nematode extraction and plant morphological data: Mature cysts were extracted from a 250 cm3 sub-sample of soil from each pot 10 wks after infestation using a modified semi-automatic elutriator and sucrose centrifugation technique (Byrd et al., 1976). Cysts from 250 cm3 soil were counted under 40x, then crushed in a blender to release eggs, which were then stained with acid fuchsin (Byrd et al., 1983). Stained eggs were counted at 40x in two 10 ml aliquots sub-sampled from a 250 ml suspension in tap water. Reproductive index was calculated by dividing the egg population at the end of the experiment (Pf /1000 cm3 soil) by the initial egg inoculum level (Pi = 5,000). Additionally, plant height, fresh stalk and leaf weight, fresh and dry root weight, and leaf numbers were measured, and fresh shoot to root weight ratio was calculated, at the end of the experiments. The dry root weight of each plant was obtained by drying the roots in a hot air oven for 5 d at 65°C.
Statistical analysis: Analyses of variance (PROC GLM) were conducted using SAS 9.1v software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) to evaluate treatment effects. All nematode data were log-transformed (log10 x+1) prior to statistical analysis. Treatment means were compared using the Waller-Duncan t-test (k-ratio = 100).
Field experiments: Separate field experiments were conducted using G. t. solanacearum-susceptible oriental tobacco cv. Xanthi and flue-cured tobacco cv. K326 in 2006 and 2007 at the Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Blackstone, Virginia. The oriental tobacco experiment was conducted in both years, while the flue-cured tobacco test was conducted only in 2007. Each experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Plots were 12.2 m long and 1.2 m wide, with two border rows on either side of a single data row. Plants were spaced 0.3 m apart. Based on the initial greenhouse trials, treatments included in the oriental tobacco experiments were 1) an untreated control; 2) seedlings grown in medium amended with IN937a + A13 at the rate of 593.5 g per cubic meter of mixture; 3) hand application of approximately 1 g of IN937a + A13 per plant 7 d after transplanting (DAT); 4) seedlings grown in IN937a + A13-amended medium sprayed 7 DAT with 200 mg/L ASM at the rate of 7.57 g a.i./7,000 plants; 5) 200 mg/L ASM sprayed 21 DAT at the rate of 7.55 g a.i./7,000 plants; 6) ASM sprayed 42 DAT at the rate of 7.58 g a.i./7,000 plants; and 7) 200 mg/L ASM sprayed every 10 d at the rate of 7.66 g a.i./7,000 plants on an average, from 7 DAT until harvest at 63 DAT. The three treatments in the flue-cured tobacco experiment included an untreated control; seedlings grown in IN937a + A13-amended medium; and ASM applied every 10 d, from seven DAT until harvest. Cultivation practices in both experiments followed recommendations of Virginia Cooperative Extension (Reed et al., 2007).
Nematode soil sampling, extraction, and counting: Soil samples were collected the day before transplanting and at harvest. Twenty-five soil cores, 0.30-m deep and 0.05-m wide, were collected from each data row. Core samples were bulked and stored at room temperature until processing (Byrd et al., 1983). Soil samples were processed in batches over a two-day period. Soil from each bag was first passed through a 2,800 μm sieve and a 250 cm3 sub-sample was placed into a modified Fenwick can. Cysts were floated from soil in water for five minutes, washed through a 710 μm sieve, and collected on a 250 μm sieve. Material retained in the 250 μm sieve was stored in a glass vial until cysts were counted under a stereomicroscope at 40x. Cysts were subsequently crushed in a blender for one minute to release eggs, which were stained with acid-fuchsin. Two 10 ml aliquots of eggs suspended in tap water were then counted at 40x and the average recorded (Caswell et al., 1985; Byrd et al., 1983).
Nematode root sampling, staining, and counting: Root samples were collected between 14 and 18 DAT, and later at 63 DAT. On each date, two plants were randomly selected and carefully removed from the data row in each plot, cleaned with tap water, and blotted dry. After fresh whole and feeder root weights were recorded, a 1 g feeder root sub-sample was collected randomly from each plant. Feeder root subsamples were cut into sections approximately 0.5-cm long and soaked in a 1.6% sodium hypochlorite solution for five minutes for surface sterilization and to remove any soil adhering to root surfaces. Root pieces were then rinsed thoroughly with tap water on a 25 μm sieve and transferred back to 100 ml of tap water. Ten milliliters of acid-fuchsin stain was added and root pieces were microwaved for 70 sec at medium power level (Byrd et al., 1983). The stained roots were transferred to a 25 μm sieve and rinsed under tap water. Roots were microwaved for 70 sec at medium power level after being transferred to a flask and addition of 50 mL acidified glycerin. Stained roots were examined under a stereomicroscope at 40x to count G. t. solanacearum, which were categorized into vermiform (second-stage juveniles successfully penetrated into the root without any obvious feeding), swollen (a distinct sausage-shaped juvenile), flask-shaped or pyriform, and saccate adult females bearing eggs. Vermiform juveniles were considered “preparasitic”, while swollen, pyriform, and saccate G. t. solanacearum were classified as “parasitic” stages.
Plant morphological data: Plant morphological data were obtained from the two plants collected on each sample date. Plant height, fresh weight of stalks, leaves, whole roots and fibrous feeder roots, and number of leaves, were recorded. Dry weight of whole roots was also recorded after drying at 60°C for seven days.
Statistical analysis: Analyses of variance (PROC GLM) were conducted using SAS 9.1v software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) to evaluate treatment effects. All nematode data were log-transformed (log10 x+1) prior to statistical analysis. Combined analyses of variance were conducted and combined results are presented where interactions between treatments and experiments were not statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). Treatments means were compared using the Waller-Duncan t-test (k-ratio = 100).
Results
Greenhouse experiments
Effects of PGPR and ASM on nematode reproduction: ASM and IN937a + A13 significantly (k-ratio = 100) reduced final numbers of cysts per 250 cm3 of soil, and per gram dry root weight, compared to the untreated control in both 2005 tests on oriental tobacco (Table 1). Final numbers of cysts per gram dry root weight were also lower for the other three PGPR combined with A13 compared to the untreated control in the fall 2005 study, but final numbers of cysts per 250 cm3 soil were actually higher for SE34 + A13 than for the untreated control in the spring 2005 trial. Reproductive indices for SE34 + A13 and IN937b + A13 were also higher than for the untreated control in the spring 2005 experiment. No PGPR combined with A13 reduced nematode reproductive index in either trial. Only ASM reduced reproductive index significantly (k-ratio = 100) compared to the untreated control, and that only in the fall 2005 oriental tobacco test (Table 1).
Table 1.
Influence of acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) and four combinations of plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria on reproduction of Globodera tabacum solanacearum on oriental (cv. Xanthi) and flue-cured (cv. K326) tobacco. Results were obtained under greenhouse conditions at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, VA.*
ASM and all of the PGPR combinations significantly (k-ratio = 100) reduced final numbers of cysts per 250 cm3 of soil in the fall 2006 test on flue-cured tobacco, but differences with the untreated control were not statistically significant in the spring 2006 test (Table 1). Final numbers of cysts per 250 cm3 soil were higher for IN937b + A13 and SE34 + A13 than when ASM had been applied in the spring 2006 experiment. Mixtures of INR7, SE34, and IN937b with A13 significantly (k-ratio = 100) reduced cysts per gram dry root weight compared to the untreated control and ASM in the fall 2006 test (Table 1). However, only INR7 + A13 reduced cysts/gram dry root weight compared to the untreated control in the spring 2006 test (Table 1). The only significant difference (k-ratio = 100) in nematode reproductive index in the spring 2006 trial was between IN937b + A13 and ASM; all other differences were not statistically significant. However, ASM and all of the PGPR treatments except IN937b + A13 significantly (k-ratio = 100) reduced reproductive index compared to the untreated control in the fall 2006 test (Table 1).
Effects of PGPR and acibenzolar-S-methyl on tobacco growth: There were no differences (k-ratio =100) between the untreated control and any of the PGPR combinations with respect to plant height, fresh weight of stalks and leaves, or number of leaves, for either oriental or flue-cured tobacco (Table 2). Application of ASM was associated with reduced height (k-ratio =100) of flue-cured, but not oriental, tobacco (Table 2). Use of ASM also reduced fresh stalk and leaf weight compared to the untreated control in the oriental tobacco trials and in the spring 2006 flue-cured tobacco experiment, and was associated with lower fresh weight of above ground plant parts in the fall 2006 test compared to IN937b + A13. Fewer leaves were also associated with ASM versus the untreated control in the oriental tobacco experiments and in the spring 2006 trial.
Table 2.
Influence of acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) and plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria on oriental (cv. Xanthi) and flue-cured (cv. K326) tobacco growth under greenhouse conditions at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, VA.*
Fresh root weights were similar between the PGPR treatments and the untreated control in the oriental tobacco tests and in the fall 2006 flue-cured tobacco study (Table 2). In the spring 2006 flue-cured tobacco experiment, fresh root weight was higher (k-ratio = 100) for INR7 + A13 than for the untreated control. All PGPR combinations except IN937a + A13 increased dry root weight of oriental tobacco versus the untreated control in the spring 2005 test, but an increase was only noted for INR7 + A13 in the fall 2005 experiment (Table 2), and dry weights of flue-cured tobacco roots were similar among PGPR treatments and the untreated control in all experiments (Table 2). ASM reduced root fresh weight of flue-cured and oriental tobacco compared to all other treatments in all experiments, but reductions in dry root weight versus the untreated control only occurred in the flue-cured tobacco tests (Table 2).
Field experiments
Effects of IN937a + A13 and ASM on G. t. solanacearum penetration, development, and reproduction: Growing seedlings in media amended with IN937a + A13 did not reduce numbers of G. t. solanacearum vermiform juveniles in roots 14-18d after transplanting (DAT) for either flue-cured or oriental tobacco in any of the three field experiments (Table 3). In 2007, treatment with IN937a + A13 alone reduced (k-ratio = 100) the number of G. t. solanacearum swollen juveniles in flue-cured tobacco roots and the number of adult G. t. solanacearum in roots of oriental tobacco, but otherwise the number of G. t. solanacearum juveniles in tobacco roots 14-18 DAT was similar to that in untreated roots. One ASM application 7 DAT did not reduce nematode parasitism of oriental tobacco 7-11d later in 2006 or 2007, but did reduce (k-ratio = 100) G. t. solanacearum numbers in flue-cured tobacco roots in 2007 (Table 3). However, in both field experiments, ASM application 7 DAT to transplants grown in IN937a + A13-amended media generally reduced (k-ratio = 100) the number of G. t. solanacearum juveniles of all life stages in oriental tobacco roots 14-18 DAT (Table 3).
Table 3.
Effects of acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens IN937a + Bacillus subtilis A13 (IN937a+A13) on Globodera tabacum solanacearum root development 14-18 d after transplanting oriental (cv. Xanthi) and flue-cured tobacco (cv. K326) in the field at the Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Blackstone, VA.*
The only treatment differences among nematode numbers 63 DAT were in the number of G. t. solanacearum swollen juveniles in oriental tobacco roots (Table 4). Plants originally produced in IN937a + A13-amended media contained fewer (k-ratio = 100) G. t. solanacearum swollen juveniles 63 DAT compared to untreated plants in 2007 (Table 4). In 2006, fewer (k-ratio = 100) G. t. solanacearum swollen juveniles were found in roots of plants treated with IN937a + A13 at seeding compared to those sprayed with ASM 42 DAT. In 2007, fewer (k-ratio = 100) G. t. solanacearum swollen juveniles were noted in plants treated with IN937a + A13, or sprayed with ASM 21 DAT, compared to plants treated with ASM five times on a 10d interval. No statistically significant treatment differences were observed in nematode numbers 63 DAT in flue-cured tobacco (Table 4).
Table 4.
Effects of acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens IN937a + Bacillus subtilis A13 (IN937a+A13) on Globodera tabacum solanacearum root development 63 d after transplanting and reproductive index (Pf/Pi) in oriental (cv. Xanthi) and flue-cured tobacco (cv. K326) in the field at the Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Blackstone, VA.
Nematode reproductive index data were combined across 2006 and 2007 oriental tobacco experiments because an analysis of variance combined across field experiments in those years found no significant interactions (P ≤ 0.05) between treatments and experiments. Spraying an average of 7.66 g a.i. ASM /7,000 plants on foliage every 10 d, or one 7.57 g a.i./7,000 plants ASM spray 7 DAT to plants grown on IN937a + A13-amended medium, significantly reduced (k-ratio = 100) nematode reproductive index on oriental tobacco (Table 4). Nematode reproduction was similar to the untreated control in all other treatments. Nematode reproductive index was also similar among the three treatments in the 2007 flue-cured tobacco test (Table 4).
Effects of IN937a + A13 and ASM on tobacco growth: All IN937a + A13 treatments increased (k-ratio =100) stalk and leaf weight in the 2006 oriental tobacco test compared to the untreated control, as did a single ASM application 42 DAT, but trends among treatments in fresh stalk and leaf weight were not significant (k-ratio =100) in the 2007 oriental tobacco test (Table 5). Apparent treatment differences in fresh and dry root weights were not statistically significant in 2006, but incorporating IN937a + A13 into seedling-growth media was associated (k-ratio =100) with increased fresh root weights of oriental tobacco in 2007, and with increased dry root weight when ASM was not also applied (Table 5). Five applications of ASM every 10 d reduced oriental tobacco dry root weight and fresh feeder root weight compared to the untreated control (Table 5). The only treatment difference in plant growth characteristics in the 2007 flue-cured tobacco field experiment was a lower (k-ratio =100) dry root weight (k-ratio = 100) when plants had been sprayed every 10 d with ASM compared to plants that grew in IN937a + A13-amended medium in the greenhouse prior to transplanting (Table 5).
Table 5.
Influence of acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens IN937a + B. subtilis A13 (IN937a+A13) on tobacco growth 63-70 d after transplanting in the field at the Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Blackstone, VA.*
Discussion
Application of ASM or IN937a + A13 consistently reduced G. t. solanacearum parasitism in our greenhouse experiments, particularly on oriental tobacco, and a combination of the two treatments reduced parasitism in the field. Effects on G. t. solanacearum parasitism by combinations of A13 with INR7, SE34, or IN937b were less consistent. Increases in G. t. solanacearum reproduction were associated with the SE34 + A13 and IN937b + A13 mixtures in our greenhouse tests. Some PGPR have been shown to alter root architecture by enhancing lateral root growth (Mantelin et al., 2006), which could influence the nematode infection process, most likely by increasing the number of penetration sites available to second stage G. t. solanacearum juveniles. Although our results did not indicate the mechanisms involved in the suppression of nematode parasitism by ASM and IN937a + A13, but ASM, IN937a, and IN937a + A13 have been previously reported to induce resistance to various pathogens of tobacco and other crops (Cole, 1999; Park and Kloepper, 2000; Csinos et al., 2001; Johnson, 2004; Perez et al., 2003; Mandal et al, 2008; Kokalis-Burelle et al, 2002). Our results agree with reports from other crops demonstrating possible induced resistance effects to nematodes through either SAR or ISR mechanisms (Chinnasri and Sipes, 2005; Hasky-Günther et al., 1998; Hoffmann-Hergarten et al., 1998; Kempster et al., 2001; Oka and Cohen, 2001; Reitz et al., 2000).
The application methods for ASM and IN937a + A13 were altered in our field trials to accommodate practical considerations of tobacco production, making it difficult to identify factors responsible for the differing results between greenhouse and field trials. The more promising field trial results obtained from root samples collected early in the growing season (versus harvest) suggest that some re-application of inducers may be necessary in the field to extend induced resistance throughout the entire growing season (Anderson et al., 2006; Leadbeater and Staub, 2007). In tobacco, such follow-up applications might be possible and practical because the crop is normally cultivated two to three times during the first month after transplanting (Hawks and Collins, 1983). Various formulations of bacteria or PGPR could also be tested for their suitability and performance in extending suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes throughout the growing season.
However, combining production of tobacco transplants in IN937a + A13-amended medium with a single application of ASM shortly after transplanting resulted in reduced G. t. solanacearum parasitism and reproduction on oriental tobacco. Although application of ASM alone every 10 d was consistently associated with reduced G. t. solanacearum parasitism, phytotoxicity and reductions in plant growth were observed in some circumstances. Mandal et al. (2008) noted phytotoxicity from a single application of 4.0 g ASM/7,000 plants to flue-cured tobacco seedlings. Their greenhouse research applied ASM in a foliar spray that was followed by a subsequent water spray that moved ASM to the root zone. We also observed phytotoxic symptoms in our greenhouse work, although our foliar ASM applications did not involve subsequent “wash-off” sprays that could reduce foliar absorbance of the compound, but increase the chances of possible root uptake. Our field ASM applications were not followed by wash-off sprays. In addition, the spray volume applied in our field tests, based on product label specifications, did not completely cover all foliage. A spray volume in our field experiments sufficient to provide complete coverage “to run-off”, as in our greenhouse tests, would have significantly increased the amount of ASM available for foliar absorbance from each ASM application, perhaps resulting in more phytotoxic symptoms. However, as applied in the experiments reported here, a single application of ASM at 7.57 g a.i. ASM/7,000 plants, combined with PGPR, consistently reduced G. t. solanacearum in our field testing, without any phytotoxicity.
In summary, application of ASM reduced G. t. solanacearum parasitism in flue-cured and oriental tobacco, but also often induced undesirable effects on plant growth. Application of a combination of the PGPR IN937a and A13 suppressed G. t. solanacearum reproduction without undesirable effects on plant growth. Further research is necessary to confirm the principle mechanisms behind the observed suppression of nematode parasitism by ASM and IN937a + A13, respectively, and to improve the consistency and extent of nematode suppression. Exploring alternative application methods, such as timing, number of applications, and product formulation, may be important in identifying practical systems to optimize disease control from induced resistance.
Footnotes
Authors would like to thank Philip Morris USA for their financial support, and faculty and staff at the Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Blackstone, VA.
This paper was edited by Isgouhi Kaloshian.
Literature Cited
- Anderson AJ, Blee KA, Yang KY. Commercialization of plant systemic defense activation: Theory, problems and successes. In: Tuzun S, Bent E, editors. Multigenic and induced systemic resistance in plants. New York: Springer; 2006. pp. 386–414. [Google Scholar]
- Byrd DW, Jr, Barker KR, Ferris H, Nusbaum CJ, Griffin WE, Small RH, Stone CA. Two semi-automatic elutriators for extracting nematodes and certain fungi from soil. Journal of Nematology. 1976;8:206–212. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byrd DW, Kirkpatrick T, Barker KR. An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes. Journal of Nematology. 1983;15:142–143. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caswell EP, Thomason IJ, McKinney HE. Extraction of cysts and eggs of Heterodera schachtii from soil with an assessment of extraction efficiency. Journal of Nematology. 1985;17:337–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chinnasri B, Sipes B. Effect of a systemic acquired resistance inducer on nematodes infecting pineapple. Acta Horticulturae. 2005;666:213–222. [Google Scholar]
- Cole DL. The efficacy of acibenzolar- S-methyl, an inducer of systemic acquired resistance, against bacterial and fungal diseases of tobacco. Crop Protection. 1999;18:267–273. [Google Scholar]
- Csinos AS, Pappu HR, McPherson RM, Stephenson MG. Management of Tomato spotted wilt virus in flue-cured tobacco with ASM and imidacloprid. Plant Disease. 2001;85:292–296. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.3.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasky-Günther K, Hoffmann-Hergarten S, Sikora RA. Resistance against the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida systemically induced by the rhizobacteria Agrobacterium radiobacter (G12) and Bacillus sphaericus (B43) Fundamental and Applied Nematology. 1998;21:511–517. [Google Scholar]
- Hammerschmidt R. Introduction: Definition and some history. In: Walters D, Newton A, Lyon G, editors. Induced resistance for plant defense: A sustainable approach to crop protection. UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Hawks SN, Collins WK. Cultivation and weed control. In: Hawks SN, Collins WK, editors. Principles of flue-cured tobacco production. Raleigh: NC State University; 1983. pp. 199–220. [Google Scholar]
- Hoffmann-Hergarten S, Gulati MK, Sikora RA. Yield response and biological control of Meloidogyne incognita on lettuce and tomato with rhizobacteria. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 1998;105:349–358. [Google Scholar]
- Huang JS. Mechanism of resistance. In: Sharma SB, editor. The Cyst Nematodes. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. pp. 353–368. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson CS. Fungicide Nematicide Tests 60:FC106; 2004. Fungicides and induced resistance for control of target spot on flue-cured tobacco in Virginia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson CS. Tobacco. In: Barker KR, Pederson GA, Windham GL, editors. Plant Nematode Interactions. Agronomy Monograph 36. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomists; 1998. pp. 487–522. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson CS. Blacksburg, USA: Virginia cooperative extension; 2008. Flue-cured tobacco production guide publication No. 436-048. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson CS, Way JA, Barker KR. Nematode parasites of tobacco. In: Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge J, editors. Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture. Oxford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2005. pp. 675–708. [Google Scholar]
- Kempster VN, Davies KA, Scott ES. Chemical and biological induction of resistance to the clover cyst nematode (Heterodera trifolii) in white clover (Trifolium repens) Nematology. 2001;3:35–43. [Google Scholar]
- Kokalis-Burelle N, Vavrina CS, Rossskopf EN, Shelby RA. Field evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria amended transplant mixes and soil solarization for tomato and pepper production in Florida. Plant and Soil. 2002;238:257–266. [Google Scholar]
- Leadbeater A, Staub T. Exploitation of Induced Resistance: A Commercial Perspective. In: Walters D, Newton A, Lyon G, editors. Induced resistance for plant defense: A sustainable approach to crop protection. UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. pp. 229–242. [Google Scholar]
- LaMondia JA. Tobacco resistance to Globodera tabacum. Annals of Applied Nematology. 1988;2:77–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LaMondia JA. Early crop root destruction for management of tobacco cyst nematodes. Journal of Nematology. 2008;40:26–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mandal B, Mandal S, Csinos AS, Martinez N, Culbreath AK, Pappu HR. Biological and molecular analyses of the acibenzolar-S-methyl-induced systemic acquired resistance in flue-cured tobacco against Tomato spotted wilt virus. Phytopathology. 2008;98:196–204. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-2-0196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mantelin S, Desbrosses G, Larcher M, Tranbarger TJ, Cleyet-Marel JC, Touraine B. Nitrate-dependent control of root architecture and N nutrition are altered by a plant growth-promoting Phyllobacterium sp. Planta. 2006;223:591–603. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-0106-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller LI, Gray BJ. Heterodera solanacearum n. sp., a parasite of solanaceous plants. Nematologica. 1972;18:404–413. [Google Scholar]
- Oka Y, Cohen Y. Induced Resistance to Cyst and Root-knot Nematodes in Cereals by DL β-amino-n-butyric Acid. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2001;107:219–227. [Google Scholar]
- Park KS, Kloepper JW. Activation of PR-1a promoter by rhizobacteria which induce systemic resistance in tobacco against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci. Biological Control. 2000;18:2–9. [Google Scholar]
- Perez L, Rodriguez ME, Rodriguez F, Roson C. Efficacy of acibenzolar-S-methyl, an inducer of systemic acquired resistance against tobacco blue mold caused by Peronospora hyoscyami f. sp. tabacina. Crop Protection. 2003;22:405–413. [Google Scholar]
- Pieterse CMJ, Van Loon LC. Signaling cascades involved in induced resistance. In: Walters D, Newton A, Lyon G, editors. Induced resistance for plant defense: A sustainable approach to crop protection. UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. pp. 65–88. [Google Scholar]
- Reed TD, Johnson CS, Semtner PJ, Wilkinson CA. Blacksburg, USA: Virginia cooperative extension publication; 2007. Flue-cured tobacco production guide publication No. 436-048. [Google Scholar]
- Reitz M, Rudolph K, Schröder I, Hoffmann-Hergarten S, Hallmann J, Sikora RA. Lipopolysaccharides of Rhizobium etli Strain G12 Act in potato roots as an inducing agent of systemic resistance to infection by the cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66:3515–3518. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.8.3515-3518.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryu CM, Mohamed AF, Chia-Hui H, Munagala SR, Joseph WK, Paul WP. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2004;134:1017–26. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.026583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd AM. Extraction and estimation of cyst nematodes. In: Southey JF, editor. Laboratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes. London: Her Majesty Stationery Office; 1986. pp. 31–49. [Google Scholar]
- Sumiya T, Hirata K, Yaegashi T. Identification of three Globodera species in Japan by using isoelectric focusing method. Research bulletin plant protection service. Japan. 2002;38:49–51. [Google Scholar]
- Syngenta Crop Protection. Revolutionary product now available to prevent disease in California leafy vegetables. Plant Health Progress Report. 2001. ( http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/php/news/blockade/ Accessed on 09/08/2006).
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Implementation of risk mitigation measures for soil fumigant pesticides. 2008. ( http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/ Accessed on 04/25/2009).
- Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ. Systemic Resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1998;36:453–483. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zacheo G, Bleve-Zacheo T, Melillo MT. Biochemistry of plant defense responses to nematode infection. In: Fenoll C, Grundler FMW, Ohl SA, editors. Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Plant-Nematode Interactions. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997. pp. 201–216. [Google Scholar]





