Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2012 May 6;184(2):122–125. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.04.011

Importance of enolase in Giardia lamblia differentiation

Araceli Castillo-Romero 1, Barbara J Davids 1, Tineke Lauwaet 1, Frances D Gillin 1
PMCID: PMC3383385  NIHMSID: NIHMS379927  PMID: 22569588

Abstract

The ability of Giardia to differentiate into cysts which survive in the environment and release the virulent trophozoites after ingestion in the small intestine is essential for transmission and disease. We examined the role of enolase, a glycolytic enzyme, in Giardia differentiation. The sequence of Giardia lamblia enolase (gEno) is most similar to enolases in Homo sapiens and Leishmania mexicana, and shows the conserved catalytic and metal-binding residues. We used an integration vector to stably express wild type and mutant gEno. In trophozoites, wild type gEno localized to the cell membrane, caudal flagella and cytosol. gEno is present on the wall of mature cysts, but not in encystation secretory vesicles (ESV). The expression of gEno with a deletion of residues G167-K169, or mutations H389Q/R390S significantly inhibited excystation while mutation of residue D257K had no effect. These results suggest a role for enolase in regulation of Giardia excystation.

Keywords: Giardia lamblia, enolase, excystation, differentiation


After ingestion, giardial cysts release trophozoites that colonize the small intestine where they can cause disease. However, if they are carried downstream, trophozoites must differentiate into cysts to survive in the environment [1, 2]. In addition to major morphological changes, glycolytic metabolism decreases during encystation and increases during excystation [3]. Both differentiations are essential for transmission and disease, but the roles of metabolic enzymes are not completely understood.

Enolase (2-phosphoglycerate hydrolase) is a metal-ion-activated glycolytic enzyme that catalyzes the reversible elimination of water from 2-phosphoglycerate (2PGA) to form phosphoenolpyruvate. Enolase is one of the most abundantly expressed enzymes in the cytosol of a variety of organisms [4] and its mRNA transcript is highly expressed in Giardia trophozoites [5]. Recent evidence describes a role for enolase activity in the pathogenesis and cellular differentiation of several organisms [610]. Moreover, despite the absence of an N-terminal secretion signal, enolase has been located on the surface of a variety of parasites [1014]. Thus, enolase is suggested to be a new surface-associated virulence factor. In Giardia, enolase is specifically secreted from trophozoites in the presence of intestinal epithelial cells [15]. Although it is antigenic in natural human and experimental mouse infections [16, 17], it is not an effective vaccine target in mice [18].

Enolases are highly conserved, and gEno shares a high level of identity with enolase α and γ of Homo sapiens, and Leishmania mexicana (51%), and 49% and 46% with Trypanosoma brucei and Entamoeba histolytica, respectively. The alignment also reveals that gEno has the important residues for enolase activity (Fig. 1). In gEno, the five active site catalytic residues correspond to H170, E222, K361, H389 and K412 (marked as stars in Fig. 1). In other cells, mutation of any of these residues significantly reduces enolase activity [12, 1921]. During the 2PGA binding, enolase undergoes important conformational changes. The loops, V153-F169 and S250-G277 allow the protonation of 2PGA by H159 [4]. In gEno, the first loop is highly conserved. In addition, gEno contains the residues that can bind divalent metal ions (i.e. Mg2+, Zn2+, and Mn2+). Mg2+ is the strongest enolase activating metal [4, 22]. Binding of two Mg2+ ions is essential: the first Mg2+ (“Mg2+ (I)”) is required for the correct conformation of the active site and binds to E306, D257, and D336; the second Mg2+ (“Mg2+ (II)”) directly interacts with S41 and 2PGA [23]. Giardia is one of the few parasites that can be encysted and excysted in vitro and we tested the localization and role of HA-tagged gEno in both differentiations, using a recently developed integrated vector that introduces a C-terminal triple HA tag under the selection marker puromycin [24]. The localization of HA-tagged gEno (Fig. 2D–F) was identical to that of native gEno with a specific antibody (Fig. 2A–C) [15]. The introduction of the epitope tag did not affect the localization of enolase. Despite the absence of an N-terminal secretion signal, gEno localizes to the plasma membrane, as well as the cytoplasm, and caudal flagella of vegetative trophozoites (Fig. 2A, B, D and E). The presence of enolase on the plasma membrane has also been observed in other protozoan parasites, bacteria, helminths and fungi and is suggested to aid in completion of their life cycle and/or tissue invasion [614]. Similar to Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba invadens and Naegleria fowleri [68], gEno associates with the cyst wall in mature water-resistant cysts (Fig. 2G and H). In addition, the HA-tagged gEno expression was analyzed by Western blotting using a specific gEno antibody [15]. Two bands matching the predicted full-length native gEno (48 kDa) and HA-tagged gEno (54 kDa) show the preponderance of the wild-type protein (Fig. 1J).

Fig. 1. Sequence analyses of Giardia lamblia enolase (gEno).

Fig. 1

Giardia lamblia enolase (gEno, GL50803_11118; GenBank Accession No. XP_001709336.1) was aligned with the enolase genes of Entamoeba histolytica (Ehist) (GenBank Accession No. AAA80166.1), Leishmania mexicana (Lmex) (GenBank Accession No. DQ221745), Trypanosoma brucei (Tbru) (GenBank Accession No. AAF73201) and α and γ enolase of Homo sapiens (AHomo and GHomo) (GenBank Accession No. NP_001419.1 and GenBank Accession No. NP_001966.1). Active site residues are marked with a star and metal-binding residues are labeled with a black circle. The alignment was made using Vector NTI Advance software, version 9 (Life Technologies). Black arrows indicate the residues that were deleted or mutated in this study. The underline identifies the highly conserved first loop involved in the protonation of 2PGA by H159 [4].

Fig. 2. Immunolocalization of enolase in Giardia lamblia trophozoites and cysts.

Fig. 2

Using genomic Giardia DNA and the primer pairs Eno-pKS-F and Eno-pKS-R (supplementary Table 1), a 925 bp coding region of gEno was amplified by PCR and cloned into an integration vector (called “gEno-pKS”) that introduces a C-terminal triple HA tag under puromycin selection [24]. Plasmid gEno-pKS was linearized using ApaI (Promega), and introduced into Giardia lamblia WB (clone C6, ATCC 50803). Transfected cells were cultured [25] and encysted as described [26]. gEno localization was analyzed using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse E800). Vegetative trophozoites (A–F) and mature water-treated cysts (G–I) were stained with a specific gEno antibody (A, B) [15] and anti-HA-FITC antibody (green; Roche) (D and E, G and H). Mature cysts were also stained with an anti-CWP1-TRITC antibody (red; A300cy3R-1X, Waterborne) [27] (H). DIC images are shown on the right. Nucleic acid staining is shown in blue (DAPI). Arrows indicate trophozoite or cyst surface, and arrowheads show caudal flagella. Transfected cells were harvested and prepared for Western blotting using a specific gEno antibody (J) [15]. Black arrows indicate native and HA-tagged gEno. Bar = 10μm.

To identify a specific role of enolase, we used an integrated vector [24] to obtain four independent constructs that each expressed either wild type or one of three mutated forms of gEno and assessed the capacity of the mutant Giardia to encyst and excyst. Untransfected Giardia (C6) and trophozoites expressing wild type HA-tagged gEno (called “gEno-pKS”) were used as controls. The mutant cell lines are: gEno-del-pKS, a deletion of G167-K169 amino acids involved in 2PGA conversion; gEno-mutI-pKS, in which the first Mg2+ binding site D257 was mutated to K257; gEno-mutII-pKS, in which the active site residues H389 and R390 were mutated to Q389 and S390. Mutations of either H159 or H373 (corresponding to H170 and H389, respectively in the gEno sequence) resulted in significant decreases in yeast enolase activity [4, 20, 21]. These gEno mutations and deletion did not affect the growth or localization of HA-tagged enolase in vegetative trophozoites (data not shown). Trophozoites were induced to encyst and ESV were counted at 20 h and cysts at 48 h after induction. The total number of ESV in gEno-del-pKS and gEno-mutII-pKS encysting trophozoites was only slightly, but significantly reduced (Fig. 3A). No significant differences were observed in the number of mature cysts (data not shown). This was surprising since enolase is important in encystation of E. invadens and N. fowleri [6, 8]. Although the transgene only replaces one of the four copies of enolase genes, allowing for expression of the wild-type enzyme, the gEno-del-pKS and gEno-mutII-pKS mutations significantly impaired the ability of parasites to excyst (43 and 66%, respectively) compared to the controls (Fig. 3B). The fact that two separate mutations, that likely inactivate enolase, cause the same phenotype leads us to conclude that this enzyme has an important role in Giardia excystation. In contrast, mutation of D257, one of the Mg2+ (I) binding sites (gEno-mutI-pKS) does not have any apparent effect on excystation (Fig. 3B). Since only one of the three Mg2+ (I) sites was mutated, it is possible that the overall conformation of the active site pocket and Mg2+ binding are unaffected. Future studies will evaluate the enzymatic activities of these gEno mutants. Our finding that parasites expressing gEno mutants are impaired in excystation indicates that enolase might have crucial roles in cellular activation from dormancy. This opens the door for in depth investigations of the role of other metabolic enzymes in differentiation of Giardia and other protozoan parasites.

Fig. 3. Enolase participates in Giardia lamblia excystation.

Fig. 3

The overlapping-extension PCR was used to generate three mutant forms of gEno. We designed two flanking primers: Eno-pKS-F and Eno-pKS-R and three pairs of internal primers to generate the desired alterations: Eno-Del-F, Eno-Del-R, Eno-Mutl-F, Eno-MutI-R, Eno-MutII-F and Eno-MutII-R (Supplementary Table I). The first pair of internal primers was designed to produce a deletion of G167-K169, the second pair produced a single mutation D257K and the third pair produced a double mutation H389Q/R390S. Fragments were sequenced (EtonBio) using primers pKS-F and pKS-R, and cloned into the integration vector that introduces a C-terminal triple HA tag under puromycin selection [24]. The resulting plasmids, gEno-del-pKS, gEno-mutI-pKS or gEno-mutII-pKS, were linearized by ApaI digestion and introduced into Giardia trophozoites. Puromycin selected parasites were induced to encyst [26] and excyst [28]. Bars represent the average numbers of ESV/50 cells (A) and the % of inhibition of excyzoites (B). Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (StatPlus ® 2009) and P values of ≤ 0.05 were considered significantly different. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n=3; *p-value=0.02, **p-value=0.017, ***p-value=0.00011).

Supplementary Material

01

Highlights.

  • The glycolytic enzyme enolase localizes in the cyst wall of Giardia

  • Exploited gene integration technology to introduce deletions and mutations in Giardia

  • Deletion and mutation of important enolase sites impair excystation of Giardia

Acknowledgments

We thank Maya Millman-Gray and Cynthia Quindoza for technical support, and Zac Cande and Stephane Gourguechon for the giardial integration vector. This work was supported by NIH grants, AI42488 and UO1 AI75527. Araceli Castillo-Romero was a scholarship recipient from UCMEXUS-CONACYT and we are grateful for their support.

Abbreviations

gEno

Giardia lamblia enolase

CWP

cyst wall protein

ESV

encystation secretory vesicles

HA

hemagglutinin

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Adam RD. Biology of Giardia lamblia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:447–75. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.3.447-475.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carranza PG, Lujan HD. New insights regarding the biology of Giardia lamblia. Microbes Infect. 2010;12:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paget TA, Macechko PT, Jarroll EL. Metabolic changes in Giardia intestinalis during differentiation. J Parasitol. 1998;84:222–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pancholi V. Multifunctional alpha-enolase: its role in diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001;58:902–20. doi: 10.1007/PL00000910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Birkeland SR, Preheim SP, Davids BJ, Cipriano MJ, Palm D, Reiner DS, et al. Transcriptome analyses of the Giardia lamblia life cycle. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2010;174:62–5. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Segovia-Gamboa NC, Chavez-Munguia B, Medina-Flores Y, Cazares-Raga FE, Hernandez-Ramirez VI, Martinez-Palomo A, et al. Entamoeba invadens, encystation process and enolase. Exp Parasitol. 2010;125:63–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Segovia-Gamboa NC, Talamas-Rohana P, Angel-Martinez A, Cazares-Raga FE, Gonzalez-Robles A, Hernandez-Ramirez VI, et al. Differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica: a possible role for enolase. Exp Parasitol. 2011;129:65– 71. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chavez-Munguia B, Segovia-Gamboa N, Salazar-Villatoro L, Omana-Molina M, Espinosa-Cantellano M, Martinez-Palomo A. Naegleria fowleri: Enolase is Expressed During Cyst Differentiation. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2011;58:463–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Avilan L, Gualdron-Lopez M, Quinones W, Gonzalez-Gonzalez L, Hannaert V, Michels PA, et al. Enolase: a key player in the metabolism and a probable virulence factor of trypanosomatid parasites-perspectives for its use as a therapeutic target. Enzyme Res. 2011:932549. doi: 10.4061/2011/932549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Swenerton RK, Zhang S, Sajid M, Medzihradszky KF, Craik CS, Kelly BL, et al. The oligopeptidase B of Leishmania regulates parasite enolase and immune evasion. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:429–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.138313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vanegas G, Quinones W, Carrasco-Lopez C, Concepcion JL, Albericio F, Avilan L. Enolase as a plasminogen binding protein in Leishmania mexicana. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:1511–6. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0668-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sha J, Erova TE, Alyea RA, Wang S, Olano JP, Pancholi V, et al. Surface- expressed enolase contributes to the pathogenesis of clinical isolate SSU of Aeromonas hydrophila. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:3095–107. doi: 10.1128/JB.00005-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mundodi V, Kucknoor AS, Alderete JF. Immunogenic and plasminogen- binding surface-associated alpha-enolase of Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Immun. 2008;76:523–31. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01352-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ghosh AK, Jacobs-Lorena M. Surface-expressed enolases of Plasmodium and other pathogens. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106 (Suppl 1):85–90. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762011000900011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ringqvist E, Palm JE, Skarin H, Hehl AB, Weiland M, Davids BJ, et al. Release of metabolic enzymes by Giardia in response to interaction with intestinal epithelial cells. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2008;159:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davids BJ, Palm JE, Housley MP, Smith JR, Andersen YS, Martin MG, et al. Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor in intestinal immune defense against the lumen-dwelling protozoan parasite Giardia. J Immunol. 2006;177:6281–90. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Palm JE, Weiland ME, Griffiths WJ, Ljungstrom I, Svard SG. Identification of immunoreactive proteins during acute human giardiasis. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:1849–59. doi: 10.1086/375356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jenikova G, Hruz P, Andersson MK, Tejman-Yarden N, Ferreira PC, Andersen YS, et al. alpha1-giardin based live heterologous vaccine protects against Giardia lamblia infection in a murine model. Vaccine. 2011;29:9529–37. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reed GH, Poyner RR, Larsen TM, Wedekind JE, Rayment I. Structural and mechanistic studies of enolase. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996;6:736–43. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brewer JM, Holland MJ, Lebioda L. The H159A mutant of yeast enolase 1 has significant activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;276:1199–202. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brewer JM, Glover CV, Holland MJ, Lebioda L. Effect of site-directed mutagenesis of His373 of yeast enolase on some of its physical and enzymatic properties. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1340:88–96. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(97)00029-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carmieli R, Larsen TM, Reed GH, Zein S, Neese F, Goldfarb D. The catalytic Mn2+ sites in the enolase-inhibitor complex: crystallography, single-crystal EPR, and DFT calculations. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:4240–52. doi: 10.1021/ja066124e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schreier B, Hocker B. Engineering the enolase magnesium II binding site: implications for its evolution. Biochemistry. 2010;49:7582–9. doi: 10.1021/bi100954f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gourguechon S, Cande WZ. Rapid tagging and integration of genes in Giardia intestinalis. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10:142–5. doi: 10.1128/EC.00190-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Keister DB. Axenic culture of Giardia lamblia in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented with bile. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983;77:487–8. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(83)90120-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Davids BJ, Gilbert MA, Liu Q, Reiner DS, Smith AJ, Lauwaet T, et al. An atypical proprotein convertase in Giardia lamblia differentiation. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2011;175:169–80. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mowatt MR, Lujan HD, Cotten DB, Bowers B, Yee J, Nash TE, et al. Developmentally regulated expression of a Giardia lamblia cyst wall protein gene. Mol Microbiol. 1995;15:955–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Boucher SE, Gillin FD. Excystation of in vitro-derived Giardia lamblia cysts. Infect Immun. 1990;58:3516–22. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.11.3516-3522.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES