Abstract
The hyperpolarization-activated cation current Ih is an important regulator of neuronal excitability and may contribute to the properties of the dentate gyrus granule (DGG) cells, which constitute the input site of the canonical hippocampal circuit. Here, we investigated changes in Ih in DGG cells in human temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and the rat pilocarpine model of TLE using the patch-clamp technique. Messenger-RNA (mRNA) expression of Ih-conducting HCN1, 2 and 4 isoforms was determined using semi-quantitative in-situ hybridization. Ih density was ~1.8-fold greater in DGG cells of TLE patients with Ammon’s horn sclerosis (AHS) as compared to patients without AHS. The magnitude of somatodendritic Ih was enhanced also in DGG cells in epileptic rats, most robustly during the latent phase after status epilepticus and prior to the occurrence of spontaneous epileptic seizures. During the chronic phase, Ih was increased ~1.7-fold. This increase of Ih was paralleled by an increase in HCN1 and HCN4 mRNA expression, whereas HCN2 expression was unchanged. Our data demonstrate an epilepsy-associated upregulation of Ih likely due to increased HCN1 and HCN4 expression, which indicate plasticity of Ih during epileptogenesis and which may contribute to a compensatory decrease in neuronal excitability of DGG cells.
Keywords: Hippocampus, Rat pilocarpine model, Patch-clamp, h-Current, Human, Temporal lobe epilepsy
1. Introduction
The hyperpolarization-activated current Ih is a slowly activating, non-inactivating depolarizing cationic current which is activated by hyperpolarization beyond −50 to −70 mV. These unique biophysical properties provide the basis for the diverse roles ascribed to this current, i.e. control of resting membrane potential, passive membrane properties, pacemaker activity, rebound burst firing in heart and brain, reduction of dendritic summation and the presence of certain types of resonance behavior in neurons [1-8].
The specific function of h-channels in each neuronal population depends strongly on the voltage- and time-dependent properties of Ih. An important molecular mechanism for generating functionally diverse Ih is the differential expression of the four underlying HCN1-4 subunits. Homomeric channels formed by these HCN subunits display very different kinetics, steady-state voltage dependence and sensitivity to modulation by cAMP in heterologous expression systems [2]. Thus, regulation of the relative abundance of HCN subunit protein is likely to represent a key mechanism for plasticity of Ih. Importantly, the functional properties of Ih and the expression of the corresponding subunits are differentially modulated during postnatal development as well as in both acquired and genetic forms of epilepsy in a region- and time-dependent manner in different in vitro and in vivo models [6,9-18]. An emerging “leitmotiv”, at least in CA1 hippocampal or neocortical neurons, seems to be the downregulation of the HCN1-subunit along with a decrease in somatodendritic Ih, followed, via an enhanced input resistance, by neuronal hyperexcitability in the chronic state.
Thus, a significant body of work has implicated alteration of HCN channels expression and altered magnitude and properties of Ih in epilepsy [reviewed in 8,19]. In temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), the large majority of existing studies has focused on animal models and on the hippocampal pyramidal cell layer [20]. Remarkably, an early study suggested that changes in HCN expression might arise also in the dentate gyrus [21]. Therefore, here, we focus on the DGG cells, and examine somatodendritic Ih currents and the HCN expression levels in DGG cells of people with TLE and underlying Ammon’s horn sclerosis (AHS) and in the rat pilocarpine-model of TLE.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Pre- and postsurgical assessment of epilepsy patients
All patients had conventional scalp EEG recordings or intracranial recordings and brain MRI prior to neurosurgery. The histological grading of human hippocampus was performed according to Wyler and colleagues [22]. Investigation of human cerebral tissue was approved by the local ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained from each patient.
2.2. Pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus (SE)
Procedures on animals were performed in accordance with local guidelines and experiments were approved by the local animal care and use committee. Pilocarpine treatment of rats was carried out and animals were monitored as described in Supplementary material.
2.3. Semi-quantitative in situ hybridization (ISH) in rat hippocampus
ISH was carried out as described previously [10,21,23,24] on specimens obtained 30-60 days after SE. For details see Supplementary material.
2.4. Electrophysiology
Electrophysiological recordings of DGG cells were performed in both human and rat hippocampal slices using conventional patch clamp technique and established experimental procedures. See Supplementary material for details.
2.5. Data analysis
Ih amplitudes in response to voltage steps were determined as the difference of the end of the instantaneous current component and the current amplitude in the steady-state. The reversal potential Vrev, was determined by analysis of tail currents and subsequent linear regression analysis (see Fig. 1C and Supplementary material). The conductance-voltage curves were fitted with a Boltzmann function of the form.
| (1) |
with V50 being the voltage of half-maximal activation.
Fig. 1.
Ih density is greater in DGG neurons of people with TLE due to AHS. Ih is elicited by voltage steps from −50 to −90 mV in both DGG neurons from the non-AHS (A1) and AHS-group (B1). Scaling 10 pA/0.5 s. The inward current is blocked by ZD7288 in both groups (A2, B2). Scaling 50 pA/0.1 s. (C) Reversal potential was around −39 mV in both conditions (upper panel, tail currents indicated with an asterisk, Scaling 100 pA/0.5 s; bottom panel; filled symbols: non-AHS group; open symbols: AHS-group). (D) Ih amplitudes (left panel) and current densities at −90 mV (right panel) were significantly greater in people with AHS.
The activation time course of Ih was fit with exponential functions of the form.
| (2) |
Unpaired student’s t-test was used for statistical analyses. P values <0.05 were considered as significant. All data are given as means ± SEM.
3. Results
3.1. Ih recordings in human TLE
Properties of Ih recorded in DGG cells from seven TLE patients with AHS (AHS-group) were compared to those from three patients without AHS (non-AHS). The clinical data of the patients are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. The intrinsic membrane properties of DGG cells were not significantly different between both groups (Supplementary Table 2). Gross morphology was not different between groups, as described previously [25]. However, upon a hyperpolarizing voltage step from −50 to −90 mV for 5 s, we observed slowly developing inward current which was more pronounced in the AHS-group (Fig. 1A1 and B1). These currents were blocked by the Ih-channel blocker ZD7288 (40 μM, n = 8) in neurons from both tissues (Fig. 1A2 and B2) and had similar reversal potentials (AHS: −38.1 mV, n = 7; non-AHS group: −39.4 mV, n = 6; Fig. 1C), consistent with reported reversal potentials of Ih [5,13]. Application of 2 mM Cs+ in two recordings also blocked this current component (data not shown). Taken together, these findings indicate that the recorded time-dependent inward currents were a result of activation of Ih channels.
The mean Ih amplitudes measured with hyperpolarizing voltage steps from −50 to −90 mV (p = 0.0056, n = 8 non-AHS; n = 7 AHS; Fig. 1D) and Ih current densities normalized to the cell capacitance were significantly higher in the AHS-group (p = 0.0077, n = 8 nonAHS; n = 7 AHS; Fig. 1D). The voltage-dependence of activation was significantly shifted to more depolarized potentials in the AHS-group (non-AHS group: V50 = −85.9 ± 2.3 mV; AHS-group: V50 = −78.2 ± 2.7 mV; p = 0.0001, Fig. 2A and D). The kinetics of Ih activation contained a fast and a slow component, and was examined by fitting with a bi-exponential function. The time constants of activation did not differ between groups (Fig. 2B). Likewise, the relative contribution of the fast current component to the total current amplitude varied between 66% and 73% in a voltage range between −90 and −120 mV in both groups and was not significantly different (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 2.

Activation properties of Ih in human DGG neurons. (A) A family of current traces was elicited by stepping the voltage from −50 mV to more hyperpolarized potentials in 10 mV-steps (from −60 to −120 mV) in the non-AHS (upper panel) and AHS-group (lower panel). Scaling 100 pA/1 s. (B) Fast and slow time constants were not different in both conditions at different command potentials (filled symbols: non-AHS group; open symbols: AHS-group). (C) The amplitudes from the fast (the upper data points under each condition) and the slow time component (the lower data points under each condition) were derived from the bi-exponential fitting paradigms. There was no significant difference in the relative contributions of the fast and slow current component between both conditions. Symbols as in (B). (D) The voltage-dependence of activation was significantly shifted to more depolarized potentials in the AHS-group. Symbols as in (B).
3.2. Ih recordings in rat pilocarpine model of TLE
Similar to the human, a slowly activating, non-inactivating inward conductance was seen upon voltage steps to −103 mV which was completely blocked by ZD7288 (60 μM) both in control (n = 22) and epileptic rats (n = 22, Fig. 3A, upper traces). Subtraction of the two traces allowed isolating Ih (Fig. 3A, lower trace).
Fig. 3.

Ih density is upregulated in DGG cells of rat hippocampal slices in the latent and chronic phase following pilocarpine-injection. (A) Inward currents elicited upon a voltage step from −63 to −103 mV in the absence and presence of ZD7288 (upper panel, indicated by an arrow). Lower trace obtained after subtraction of traces in the absence and presence of ZD7288. Recordings from a control animal. Scaling 10 pA/0.5 s. (B) Ih current densities during the latent and chronic phase (sham-control animals: black bars, SE-experienced animals: white bars). (C) Time constants at a potential of −103 mV were not different in controls and pilocarpine rats during latent (p = 0.49, n = 9 and 10 cells) and chronic phase (p = 0.96, n = 13 and 12 cells). Symbols as in (B).
We examined the magnitude of Ih in control and pilocarpine treated rats at two different time points: 7–9 days following SE (latent phase, no spontaneous generalized seizures) and in the chronic epileptic phase 35–63 days following SE (all spontaneous generalized seizures). Ih density was enhanced in both groups, but most pronouncedly in the latent period (Fig. 3B, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0041 for the latent and chronic group, respectively). This increase could not be explained by a change in driving force, as the reversal potential of Ih did not differ between groups (controls: −35.9 ± 2.3 mV, n = 8; pilocarpine-treated rats: −36.8 ± 2.3 mV, n = 8). The time course of activation was best fit with a mono-exponential equation with no significant differences between controls and pilocarpine-treated animals neither at early nor at late stages following SE (Fig. 3C).
To understand the neurobiological basis of the persistent increase in Ih in DGG cells of epileptic rats, we investigated the expression of the genes coding for the h-channels. We compared mRNA expression of HCN1, 2 and 4 channel isoforms in chronically epileptic, pilocarpine-treated rats versus the control group. Whereas HCN2 expression was not different in both groups (not shown), expression of HCN1 mRNA was significantly increased by 22% in the pilocarpine-treated (67.9 ± 4.0 nCi/gm) compared to control rats (55.4 ± 3.2 nCi/gm; p < 0.05, Fig. 4A). This effect was more pronounced for the HCN4 channel isoform. HCN4 mRNA level was enhanced by 52% in the granule cell layer of epileptic (70.75 ± 6.4 nCi/gm) relative to controls rats (46.75 ± 1.0 nCi/gm; p < 0.05; Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.

Expression of both HCN1 and HCN 4 subunits is increased in epileptic animals following pilocarpine-induced SE. As depicted in the photomicrographs (A and B lower panels), HCN1 and HCN4 subunit mRNA signals were significantly increased in the granule cell layer (GCL) of the pilocarpine-group (A and B upper panels), with relatively little change in expression over the pyramidal cell layer of CA3. Brains from 4-9 animals were used per group. Asterisk indicates p < 0.05.
4. Discussion
The principal findings of the current studies are that (1) Ih density is greater in granule cell of the dentate gyrus in TLE patients with AHS as compared to those without AHS. (2) Similar findings are observed in the rat pilocarpine-model of TLE, where Ih changes precede the onset of chronic epilepsy. (3) Voltage-dependence but not kinetics of Ih is altered in the epileptic state, which might result from augmented contribution of HCN1 and HCN4 to the total HCN channels pool that conducts Ih.
4.1. Molecular mechanism of Ih upregulation
The observed upregulation of Ih in both human and rat DGG cells is most likely due to an enhanced expression of HCN1 and, at least in rat hippocampus, HCN4 subunit, as shown in Fig. 4 and as found previously [21]. This is in line with the observed shift of voltage-dependence of Ih to more depolarized potentials in tissue from people with TLE due to AHS. In general, h-channels composed of HCN1 subunits display faster Ih activation than those composed of HCN2 and HCN4 subunits [13,26]. Strikingly, current kinetics was not faster in the AHS-group or in epileptic rats as compared to controls. This might be a result of the concomitant increase of HCN4 subunits. Furthermore, the properties of Ih in native hippocampus only partially overlap those of currents recorded in heterologous systems: in human and rat hippocampus, in addition to the intrinsic biophysical properties of each HCN isoform, a number of interacting molecules influence channel properties [18,27, reviewed in 28].
What are the molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in the upregulation of Ih and HCN channels in DGG cells? Although this question has not been directly addressed in the present work, a number of recent studies provide insights into regulation of HCN expression in association with seizures and epilepsy. In the kainic acid-induced SE model of TLE, downregulation of HCN1 expression in CA1 pyramidal region was caused by an upregulation of a repressing transcription factor, neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF) which suppresses transcription of a number of genes, amongst them the HCN1 gene [20]. In addition, a reduction of HCN1 expression has been shown to involve transient Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptor activation with subsequent activation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II during in-vitro experiments in hippocampal slices [29]. Little is known, however, about mechanisms of upregulation of HCN expression. Reduction of NRSF levels might take place, or the enhanced expression might result from a myriad of cellular mechanisms that influence ion channel expression [30].
4.2. Significance for the pathophysiology of TLE and potential clinical implications
In previous studies, Ih expression appears to be differentially modulated in acquired and genetically caused epilepsies in a region- and time-dependent manner. For instance, in rat models of genetically caused absence epilepsies, impaired Ih with a concomitant decrease of HCN1 expression was found in cortical neurons [12], whereas thalamocortical neurons showed an decrease in cAMP responsiveness, explained by an increase of HCN1 expression [31,32]. Both phenomena favor onset of absence seizures. In models of acquired TLE, Ih currents and expression of underlying HCN1 and HCN2 subunits were temporarily reduced in dendrites of the entorhinal cortex following kainate-induced SE [11]. A further study found sustained reduction in HCN1 and 2 expression following kainate-induced SE in the CA1 region [16]. Likewise, in the rat pilocarpine model of TLE, dendritic Ih of CA1 pyramidal cells was progressively reduced during epileptogenesis, because of permanent reduction of HCN1-subunit expression and a persistent alteration of Ih-modulating phosphorylation pathways [6,15,18]. The significance of HCN1 downregulation is further strengthened by the observation that a primary loss of the HCN1 subunit facilitates onset of seizures and of epilepsy [33,34]. In a model of seizure-inducing hypoxia, somatic Ih in rat CA1 pyramidal was decreased [14], and a complex region-specific regulation of HCN1 and 2 in an in vitro model of epilepsy has been described, with commensurate alteration of burst activity [17].
Taken together, downregulation of Ih seems to be a leitmotiv in the early phases of epileptogenesis and epilepsy. However, relatively few studies in animal models have explored potentially compensatory alterations in HCN isoform expression and Ih in the chronic and even ‘end stage’ of TLE. Even fewer yet are studies in human tissue. In human neocortical neurons of patients with TLE, Wierschke and co-workers reported on reduced Ih density in patients with higher seizure frequencies; these observations support the notion that Ih contributes importantly to the regulation of neuronal excitability [35].
Focusing on the dentate gyrus, a major gateway into the hippocampal formation, we report here a robust, epilepsy-associated upregulation of Ih in DGG of human and rat hippocampus. Our findings are in line with a recent study reporting enhanced Ih in DGG of people with TLE with severe AHS as compared to those with mild or moderate AHS [36]. Whereas the mechanisms leading to this increase of HCN1 expression and Ih density are not fully understood, the teleological purpose is intriguing: augmented Ih in the epileptic dentate gyrus might serve as an attempt to compensate for abnormal hyperexcitability in the circuit for example, by dampening dendritic summation [1]. Alternatively, in response to augmented inhibition (hyperpolarizing), the increase in Ih might promote rebound depolarization and contribute to hyperexcitability of epileptic tissue [5,9]. Whereas other ion channels are also altered in epileptic DGG cells [37,38], the changes in Ih reported here should contribute to neuronal firing behavior, and might provide a drug target to both existing and future medications (see below).
4.3. Temporal profile of Ih upregulation
In human tissue, it is not possible to time the onset of HCN expression and Ih changes, because tissue is only available from chronic epileptic tissue. Therefore, the current studies employed also tissue from animal models. In the rat pilocarpine model employed here, an Ih upregulation was already present in the latent stage preceding the onset of spontaneous seizures, and may thus contribute to their onset. This increased Ih was associated with, and hence is likely a result of, an upregulation of both HCN1 and HCN4 mRNA in neurons of the dentate gyrus. Given the importance of Ih in attenuating postsynaptic potentials at dendrites and limiting their spread in pyramidal neurons of CA1 region and layer five of the somatosensory cortex [39,40], our data suggest that upregulation of Ih might be a protective mechanism resulting in maintained dentate gyrus gating. Dendrites of DGG neurons in rats without epilepsy have no or little Ih [41]. In view of the considerable increase of Ih, it is tempting to speculate that somatodendritic Ih in DGG neurons plays a role in signal integration only under pathophysiological circumstances such as epileptogenesis and chronic epilepsy, but not under physiological conditions.
4.4. Implications for epilepsy therapy
Ih is a target for the anticonvulsants acetazolamide, gabapentin and lamotrigine, all of which increase Ih [42-44]. It is therefore also possible that the observed upregulation of Ih renders its modulation by these antiepileptic drugs more effective, thereby dampening excitability. Such a mechanism operating in DGG cells may be particularly relevant in chronic epilepsy, when granule cells are one of the major preserved cell populations after the profound loss of neurons in the CA1, CA3 and CA4 subfields. Therefore, defining and understanding the changes in Ih and in its ‘building blocks’, the HCN channels, both in humans and animal models is important. The knowledge is a prerequisite for using this important channel as target for epilepsy therapy and prevention in the future.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the German–Israel collaborative research program of the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), the Ministry of Science (MOS), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Projects SFB-TR3 (H.B., D.D.), DI 853/3 and DI 853/4 (D.D.), the BONFOR Program of the University of Bonn, and NIH Grant NS35439. The sponsors had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in the writing of the report. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Author contributions: R.S. has contributed to the design of the experiments, data analysis and has written the manuscript. M.K. has performed the recordings in human hippocampus and contributed to data analysis. A.B. has done the in-situ immunhistochemistry, T.B.Z. has contributed to the design of the experiments, data analysis and writing of the manuscript. C.R. has performed the recordings in the rat pilocarpine model, respective data analysis and written a prior version of the manuscript. J.S. has provided neurosurgical specimen including informed consent. H.B. and D.D. have contributed to the design of the experiments, data analysis and writing of the manuscript.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.02.133.
References
- [1].Magee JC. Dendritic hyperpolarization-activated currents modify the integrative properties of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:7613–7624. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07613.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Robinson RB, Siegelbaum SA. Hyperpolarization-activated cation currents: from molecules to physiological function. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2003;65:453–480. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Santoro B, Baram TZ. The multiple personalities of h-channels. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:550–554. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2003.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Surges R, Freiman TM, Feuerstein TJ. Input resistance is voltage dependent due to activation of Ih channels in rat CA1 pyramidal cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 2004;76:475–480. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Surges R, Sarvari M, Steffens M, Els T. Characterization of rebound depolarization in hippocampal neurons. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006;348:1343–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Marcelin B, Chauvière L, Becker A, et al. H channel-dependent deficit of theta oscillation resonance and phase shift in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol. Dis. 2009;33:436–447. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Giocomo LM, Hussaini SA, Zheng F, et al. Grid cells use HCN1 channels for spatial scaling. Cell. 2011;147:1159–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Noam Y, Bernard C, Baram TZ. Towards an integrated view of HCN channel role in epilepsy. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2011;21:873–879. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Chen K, Aradi I, Thon N, et al. Persistently modified h-channels after complex febrile seizures convert the seizure-induced enhancement of inhibition to hyperexcitability. Nat. Med. 2001;7:331–337. doi: 10.1038/85480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Brewster A, Bender RA, Chen Y, et al. Developmental febrile seizures modulate hippocampal gene expression of hyperpolarization-activated channels in an isoform- and cell-specific manner. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:4591–4599. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-11-04591.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Shah MM, Anderson AE, Leung V, et al. Seizure-induced plasticity of h channels in entorhinal cortical layer III pyramidal neurons. Neuron. 2004;44:495–508. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Strauss U, Kole MH, Bräuer AU, et al. An impaired neocortical Ih is associated with enhanced excitability and absence epilepsy. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004;19:3048–3058. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Surges R, Brewster AL, Bender RA, et al. Regulated expression of HCN channels and cAMP levels shape the properties of the h current in developing rat hippocampus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006;24:94–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04880.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Zhang K, Peng BW, Sanchez RM. Decreased IH in hippocampal area CA1 pyramidal neurons after perinatal seizure-inducing hypoxia. Epilepsia. 2006;47:1023–1028. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Jung S, Jones TD, Lugo JN, Jr, et al. Progressive dendritic HCN channelopathy during epileptogenesis in the rat pilocarpine model of epilepsy. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:13012–13021. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3605-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Powell KL, Ng C, O’Brien TJ, et al. Decreases in HCN mRNA expression in the hippocampus after kindling and status epilepticus in adult rats. Epilepsia. 2008;49:1686–1695. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01593.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Adams BE, Reid CA, Myers D, et al. Excitotoxic-mediated transcriptional decreases in HCN2 channel function increase network excitability in CA1. Exp. Neurol. 2009;219:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Jung S, Bullis JB, Lau IH, et al. Downregulation of dendritic HCN channel gating in epilepsy is mediated by altered phosphorylation signaling. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:6678–6688. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1290-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Lewis AS, Chetkovich DM. HCN channels in behavior and neurological disease: too hyper or not active enough? Mol Cell. Neurosci. 2011;46:357–367. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].McClelland S, Flynn C, Dubé C, et al. Neuron-restrictive silencer factormediated hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated channelopathy in experimental temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann. Neurol. 2011;70:454–464. doi: 10.1002/ana.22479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Bender RA, Soleymani SV, Brewster AL, et al. Enhanced expression of a specific hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel (HCN) in surviving dentate gyrus granule cells of human and experimental epileptic hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:6826–6836. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-17-06826.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Wyler AR, Dohan FC, Schweitzer JB, Berry AD. A grading system for hippocampal sclerosis. J. Epilepsy. 1992;5:220–225. [Google Scholar]
- [23].Bender RA, Brewster A, Santoro B, et al. Differential and age-dependent expression of hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel isoforms 1–4 suggests evolving roles in the developing rat hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2001;106:689–698. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00314-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Brewster AL, Chen Y, Bender RA, et al. Quantitative analysis and subcellular distribution of mRNA and protein expression of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels throughout development in rat hippocampus. Cereb. Cortex. 2007;17:702–712. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhk021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Dietrich D, Clusmann H, Kral T, et al. Two electrophysiologically distinct types of granule cells in epileptic human hippocampus. Neuroscience. 1999;90:1197–1206. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00574-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Chen S, Wang J, Siegelbaum SA. Properties of hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker current defined by coassembly of HCN1 and HCN2 subunits and basal modulation by cyclic nucleotide. J. Gen. Physiol. 2001;117:491–504. doi: 10.1085/jgp.117.5.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Gravante B, Barbuti A, Milanesi R, et al. Interaction of the pacemaker channel HCN1 with filamin A. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:43847–43853. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401598200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Lewis AS, Estep CM, Chetkovich DM. The fast and slow ups and downs of HCN channel regulation. Channels (Austin) 2010;4:215–231. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.3.11630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Richichi C, Brewster AL, Bender RA, et al. Mechanisms of seizure-induced ‘transcriptional channelopathy’ of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated (HCN) channels. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008;29:297–305. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Schulz DJ, Goaillard JM, Marder E. Variable channel expression in identified single and electrically coupled neurons in different animals. Nat. Neurosci. 2006;9:356–362. doi: 10.1038/nn1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Budde T, Caputi L, Kanyshkova T, et al. Impaired regulation of thalamic pacemaker channels through an imbalance of subunit expression in absence epilepsy. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:9871–9882. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2590-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Kuisle M, Wanaverbecq N, Brewster AL, et al. Functional stabilization of weakened thalamic pacemaker channel regulation in rat absence epilepsy. J. Physiol. 2006;575:83–100. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.110486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Santoro B, Lee JY, Englot DJ, et al. Increased seizure severity and seizure-related death in mice lacking HCN1 channels. Epilepsia. 2010;51:1624–1627. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02554.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Huang Z, Walker MC, Shah MM. Loss of dendritic HCN1 subunits enhances cortical excitability and epileptogenesis. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:10979–10988. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1531-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Wierschke S, Lehmann TN, Dehnicke C, et al. Hyperpolarization-activated cation currents in human epileptogenic neocortex. Epilepsia. 2010;51:404–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02275.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Stegen M, Kirchheim F, Hanuschkin A, et al. Adaptive Intrinsic Plasticity in Human Dentate Gyrus Granule Cells during Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Cereb. Cortex. 2011 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr294. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Stegen M, Young CC, Haas CA, et al. Increased leak conductance in dentate gyrus granule cells of temporal lobe epilepsy patients with Ammon’s horn sclerosis. Epilepsia. 2009;50:646–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Young CC, Stegen M, Bernard R, et al. Upregulation of inward rectifier K+ (Kir2) channels in dentate gyrus granule cells in temporal lobe epilepsy. J. Physiol. 2009;587:4213–4233. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.170746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Stuart G, Spruston N. Determinants of voltage attenuation in neocortical pyramidal neuron dendrites. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:3501–3510. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03501.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Golding NL, Mickus TJ, Katz Y, et al. Factors mediating powerful voltage attenuation along CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites. J. Physiol. 2005;568:69–82. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.086793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Krueppel R, Remy S, Beck H. Dendritic integration in hippocampal dentate granule cells. Neuron. 2011;71:512–528. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Munsch T, Pape HC. Upregulation of the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in rat thalamic relay neurones by acetazolamide. J. Physiol. 1999;519:505–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0505m.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Poolos NP, Migliore M, Johnston D. Pharmacological upregulation of h-channels reduces the excitability of pyramidal neuron dendrites. Nat. Neurosci. 2002;5:767–774. doi: 10.1038/nn891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Surges R, Freiman TM, Feuerstein TJ. Gabapentin increases the hyperpolarization-activated cation current Ih in rat CA1 pyramidal cells. Epilepsia. 2003;44:150–156. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.36802.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

