Abstract
Two different oxygen-ligated cobalt porphyrins have been synthesized and the solid-state structures have been determined at several temperatures. The solid-state structures provide insight into the dynamics of Co–O2 rotation and correlation with protecting group disorder. [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] (TpivPP = picket fence porphyrin) is prepared by oxygenation of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)2] in benzene solution. The structure at room temperature has the oxygen ligand within the ligand binding pocket and disordered over four sites and the trans imidazole is disordered over two sites. The structure at 100 K, after the crystal has been carefully annealed to yield a reversible phase change, is almost completely ordered. The phase change is reversed upon warming the crystal to 200 K, whereupon the oxygen ligand is again disordered but with quite unequal populations. Further warming to 300 K leads to greater disorder of the oxygen ligands with nearly equal O2 occupancies at all four positions. The disorder of the t-butyl groups of the protecting pickets is correlated with rotation of the O2 around the Co–O(O2) bond. [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)] is synthesized by a solid-state oxygenation reaction from the five-coordinate precursor [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)]. Exposure to 1 atm of O2 leads to incomplete oxygenation, however, exposure at 5 atm yields complete oxygenation. Complete oxygenation leads to picket disorder whereas partial (40%) oxygenation does not. Crystallinity is retained on complete degassing of oxygen in the solid, and complete ordering of the pickets is restored. The results should provide basic information needed to better model M–O2 dynamics in protein environments.
Introduction
An understanding of the dynamics of the interactions of diatomics with hemes and heme proteins have long been considered fundamental to understanding function.1 Mössbauer spectroscopy results have shown that the dynamics of the dioxygen complexes of hemes and heme proteins are especially rich. The temperature dependence of the quadruple splitting of oxy-hemoglobin is an unusual and distinctive feature.2 The picket fence derivative [Fe(TpivPP)(1-MeIm)(O2)]3 also displayed anomalous line widths and quadrupole splittings in its Mössbauer spectra that was interpreted by Lang and co-workers as resulting from multiple configurations of the Fe–O2 unit because of rotation around the Fe–O bond.4 Later, Oldfield proposed a different model to explain the anomalous temperature-dependent line width behavior for the Mössbauer spectra; the model also required rotations around the Fe–O bond.5 The Co–O2 group in analogous cobalt complexes have similar dynamics that have been investigated by EPR.6a Rotation about Co–O bond was observed in both small molecule as well as in hemoglobin derivatives.7 Given these interesting ligand dynamics, we thought that a series of multiple-temperature X-ray studies could provide information on the ligand rotations, much like those we were able to map out for several six-coordinate nitrosyl iron porphyrinates.8, 9 In these cases, the lower temperature structures resolved disorder, even though the rotation about the the axial Fe–N bond is a very low barrier process.
Accordingly, we carried out temperature-dependent structural investigations for both iron and cobalt dioxygen-ligated derivatives of picket fence porphyrin. These have included analogs for both R- and T-state hemoglobin and cobaltohemoglobin. Although the low-temperature structure determinations have substantially improved the available structural details of oxygen complexes, the studies have only partially resolved the disorder/dynamic structural issues. The results from the cobalt derivatives are the most illuminating and provide new information on the interaction between the axial oxygen ligand and the protecting pickets of the porphyrin. We present results from two series, [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] and [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)], both of which illustrate distinct features of the interactions between O2 and the pickets. We will report results for three iron series members subsequently.10
Experimental Section
General Information
All reactions and manipulations were carried out under argon using a double-manifold vacuum line, Schlenkware and cannula techniques. Benzene, THF and heptane were distilled over sodium/benzophenone and ethanol over magnesium. Research grade oxygen (99.999%) was purchased from PRAXAIR and used as received. [H2(TpivPP)] and [Co(TpivPP)] were prepared according to a local modification of the reported syntheses;11 additional information is in the S.I. UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 19 UV/vis/near-IR spectrometer.
Synthesis of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]
A chemical struccture drawing is given in the SI. [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)] was prepared by the reaction of Co(TpivPP) (80 mg, 0.075 mmol) with excess 1-EtIm (0.06 mL, 0.60 mmol) in benzene.12 A red crystalline powder was obtained by slow introduction of heptane into the benzene solution over 2–3 hours. [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)] (21.3 mg, 0.018 mmol) was dried under vacuum in a 50-mL Schlenk for 30 min. Drops of 1-ethylimidazole and benzene (~5 mL) were then transferred into the Schlenk by cannula. This mixture was gently heated with stirring and cooled to room temperature to give a clear red solution. Oxygen was then bubbled into this solution for five minutes. X-ray quality crystals were obtained in 8 mm × 250 mm sealed glass tubes by liquid diffusion using heptane as non-solvent.
Synthesis of [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)]
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] was prepared as described previously.12 Moderate-size single crystals of [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] were exposed at room temperature to pure dioxygen gas saturated with ethanol vapor. Crystals were obtained from exposure to a) a ~1 atm dioxygen atmosphere for 3 days or b) to a ~5 atm dioxygen atmosphere for 5 days in a high pressure reaction cylinder (Parr Instrument; Model 4635). After the oxygenation, the adducts were rapidly moved into the low temperature (100 K) nitrogen stream for structural characterization.
X-ray Structure Determinations
Single-crystal experiments were carried out on a Bruker Apex II system with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and a 700 Series Oxford Cryostream. The structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXS13 and refined against F2 using SHELXL;13, 14 subsequent difference Fourier syntheses led to the location of most of the remaining non-hydrogen atoms. For the structure refinement all data were used including negative intensities. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically if not remarked otherwise below. Hydrogen atoms were idealized with the standard SHELXL idealization methods. The programs SADABS15 and TWINABS16 was used to apply absorption corrections. Solid-state analysis of crystal packing distances made use of the program MERCURY17 from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. Complete crystallographic details, atomic coordinates, anisotropic thermal parameters, and fixed hydrogen atom coordinates are given in the Supporting Information.
[Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]·C6H6
The complex displayed differing structural features depending on the thermal history and are thus described in some detail. A freshly isolated crystal with dimensions 0.39 × 0.26 × 0.19 mm3 was picked for the temperature-dependent structure analysis. The crystal was glued to the tip of a thin glass fiber and quickly moved into the 100 K N2 stream (flash cooling). The crystal was found to be in the monoclinic crystal system with C2/c as the space group. The asymmetric unit contains one-half a picket fence porphyrin complex, and one-half benzene solvent molecule. There is a crystallographic twofold axis passing through the coordinated oxygen (O1) and the cobalt (Co1) atoms and the axial 1-ethylimidazole ligand. The disordered, symmetry-related imidazoles were defined with a rigid group refinement with an ideal 1-ethylimidazole group.18 For each “picket”, the pivalamido methyl carbon atoms were found to be disordered into two sets of positions. An ideal tetrahedral rigid group19 was applied to constrain each tert-butyl group. The occupancies of the two independent pairs of tert-butyl groups refined to 0.543(13) (C20, C21, C22 and C23) and 0.457(13) (C20B, C21B, C22B and C23B); 0.555(5) (C24, C25, C26 and C27) and 0.445(5) (C24B, C25B, C26B and C27B). The terminal oxygen atom (O2) has a single crystallographically independent position and thus exhibits twofold positional disorder. The solvent benzene molecule has a twofold axis with an occupancy of a half molecule per asymmetric unit.
The crystal was then slowly warmed, in the N2 stream, to 188 K at a speed of 120 K/hr and was allowed to stand for 30 min at 188 K. The crystal was then cooled back to 100 K at a rate of 120 K/hr (ramp cooling). The crystal system was then observed to have changed to the lower symmetry of primitive triclinic. There are two twin domains with a rotation of 179.9° and TWINABS16 was used for the absorption correction. After data collection at 100 K, the structural analysis was carried out with the space group P1̄. The asymmetric unit of structure now contains one complete picket fence porphyrin complex, and one benzene solvent molecule. These molecules are ordered including completely ordered picket t-butyl groups. The only disorder observed was that of the terminal oxygen atom which occupies two crystallographically independent positions with very different refined occupancies of 0.816(6) (O2A) and 0.184(6) (O2B).
The (same) crystal was then warmed to 200 K, X-ray data for the structure determination collected, and then warmed to 300 K and diffraction data again collected. The same heating speed of 120 K/hr was used. At both temperatures, the monoclinic crystal system and the C2/c space group were found. Similar crystal structure models and refinement procedure as that used originally (C2/c, 100 K) were applied. Disorder models for the t-butyl pickets and axial imidazole ligand (twofold symmetry) were applied as before. There is one significant difference, the terminal oxygen atom now occupies two crystallographically independent positions and thus exhibits approximate fourfold positional disorder. The occupancy factors of the two unique oxygen positions were refined by means of “free variables” and the final site occupancy factors were found to be 0.41(1) (O2A) and 0.09(1) (O2B) (200 K) and 0.27(1) (O2A) and 0.23(1) (O2B) (300 K).
This unusual thermal behavior was verified with a second crystal with dimensions 0.34 × 0.26 × 0.18 mm3. When flash cooled to 100 K, the crystal again showed space group C2/c. After several annealing processes, the structure displayed the P1̄ space group. The detailed experimental process with crystallographic information and the thermal ellipsoid plot of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]·C6H6 (P1̄, measured at 80 K) are given in the Supporting Information.
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)]
The first experiment used a crystal (A) with dimensions 0.50 × 0.22 × 0.21 mm3 that had been reacted under a ~1 atm dioxygen atmosphere. After the oxygenation, the crystal was rapidly moved to diffractometer under a 100 K nitrogen stream and X-ray data was collected. This crystal sample was found to be incompletely oxygenated.
A second crystal (B) with the dimensions 0.37 × 0.21 × 0.16 mm3 was oxygenated under a ~5 atm dioxygen atmosphere. After oxygenation, which was complete, the crystal was rapidly moved to the diffractometer under a 100 K nitrogen stream and structural data collected. After the 100 K data collection, the crystal was slowly warmed to 300K at 120 K/hr under the N2 stream. Then the structural data was collected at 300 K.
The crystallographic data for all data sets was consistent with that of the monoclinic crystal system and space group C2/c; this is the same crystal system and space group as that of the five-coordinate precursor [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)]. There is a crystallographic twofold axis passing through the coordinated oxygen (O1) and the cobalt (Co1) atoms. The 2-methylimidazole ligand is disordered between two symmetry related sites. The terminal oxygen atom (O2) occupies one crystallographically independent position and thus it exhibits twofold positional disorder. The occupancy of the dioxygen ligand were carefully judged from the crystallographic results. First, the applied occupancy factor should give reasonable anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs) compared to other atoms in the same molecule. Second, the command of “FMAP –2” was applied to examine the resulting Fourier difference maps, especially the holes and peaks around the positions of dioxygen atoms. After careful refinement, the occupancies of dioxygen were set at 0.4 (crystal A), 1.0 (crystal B, 100 K) and 0.3 (crystal B, 300 K). Two ethanol solvent molecules are found and each is disordered around a twofold axis. In each structure, the first ethanol molecule is fully occupied; the second ethanol molecule occupancy was found to be 1, 0.8 and 0.8 respectively. Hence the three structures are [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)0.4(O2)]·2C2H5OH (100 K, crystal A), [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)]·1.8C2H5OH (100 K, crystal B), [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)0.3(O2)]·1.8C2H5OH (300 K, crystal B), respectively.
After the 300 K data collection, crystal B (characterized as [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)0.3(O2)]) was moved into an argon atmosphere that was saturated with ethanol vapor. Every 12 hours, the sample cylinder was pumped slightly and refilled for several cycles to keep a pure argon atmosphere. Two days later, the crystal was used for a final structural characterization. The crystal was rapidly moved to a 100 K nitrogen stream and structural data collected. In this structure, the asymmetric unit contains half picket fence porphyrin complex, and two half-ethanol solvent molecules. There is a crystallographic twofold axis passing through the cobalt atom. The 2-methylimidazole ligand was found to disorder between two twofold related sites. Each solvent ethanol molecule also possesses a twofold axis. The crystalline molecule has thus reverted to [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)]·1.8C2H5OH.
Results
The synthesis and molecular structure characterizations of two oxycobalt(II) picket fence porphyrin complexes are reported. The molecular structure determinations have been carried out at a variety of temperatures between 100–300 K. The first is six-coordinate [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)], which was synthesized and crystallized from solution. The second, [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)], utilizing sterically hindered 2-methylimidazole, was synthesized from the heterogeneous reaction of gaseous dioxygen and crystalline, five-coordinate [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)]. Difficulties with incomplete oxygenation are noted.
[Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]
The synthesis of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] is similar to that of [Fe(TpivPP)(1-MeIm)(O2)], but the precursor is five-coordinate [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)]12 instead of six-coordinate [Fe(TpivPP)(1-MeIm)2]. Crystals of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] containing the six-coordinate porphyrinate and benzene solvate, have been characterized at various temperatures and cooling regimes. Thermal ellipsoid diagrams of the molecular structure at different temperatures and thermal history are given in Figure 1. A brief summary of the crystallographic data is given in Table 1 and complete crystallographic details, atomic coordinates, bond distances, bond angles of the structure are given in Tables S1–S24 of the Supporting Information.
Table 1.
sample treatment | flash cooled | after annealing | warm to 200 K | warm to 300 K |
---|---|---|---|---|
chemical formula | C75H78CoN10O6 | C75H78CoN10O6 | C75H78CoN10O6 | C75H78CoN10O6 |
FW | 1274.40 | 1274.40 | 1274.40 | 1274.40 |
a, Å | 18.586(4) | 13.0971(9) | 18.5681(7) | 18.711(2) |
b, Å | 19.170(4) | 13.5557(9) | 19.2564(8) | 19.566(3) |
c, Å | 18.316(4) | 18.2431(12) | 18.4497(7) | 18.725(3) |
α, deg | 90 | 89.216(4) | 90 | 90 |
β, deg | 90.25(3) | 88.444(3) | 90.169(2) | 90.824(5) |
γ, deg | 90 | 88.190(3) | 90 | 90 |
V, Å3 | 6526(2) | 3235.8(4) | 6596.7(4) | 6854.6(17) |
V, Å3/molecule | 1632 | 1617.9 | 1649.2 | 1713.8 |
space group | C2/c | P1̄ | C2/c | C2/c |
Z | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
temp, K | 100 | 100 | 200 | 300 |
Dcalcd, g cm−3 | 1.297 | 1.308 | 1.283 | 1.235 |
μ, mm−1 | 0.326 | 0.328 | 0.322 | 0.310 |
final R indices | R1 = 0.0477 | R1 = 0.0496 | R1 = 0.0486 | R1 = 0.0606 |
[I > 2σ(I)] | wR2 = 0.1139 | wR2 = 0.1276 | wR2 = 0.1266 | wR2 = 0.1755 |
final R indices | R1 = 0.0783 | R1 = 0.0744 | R1 = 0.0911 | R1 = 0.1091 |
(all data) | wR2 = 0.1226 | wR2 = 0.1466 | wR2 =0.1498 | wR2 =0.2052 |
In the process of the structural characterization of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)], we observed that the low-temperature structure (100 K) is different depending on the cooling process for the specimen. When a fresh crystal is quickly cooled to 100 K in the N2 stream (flash cooling) the crystals are found in the monoclinic crystal system, whereas when the crystal was annealed and then slowly cooled to 100 K, the crystal displayed triclinic diffraction symmetry (Figure 1). This behavior appears to be both reversible and reproducible. The monoclinic crystal form is found in the centrosymmetric space group C2/c with required twofold symmetry for the molecule, and as will be discussed subsequently, the molecule has disordered axial ligands and disordered pickets. In contrast, the triclinic crystal form has no required crystallographic symmetry, completely ordered pickets and axial imidazole, and only minor disorder of the axial O2 ligand. The terminal oxygen atom occupies two crystallographically independent positions with occupancies refined to be 0.816(6) (O2A) and 0.184 (O2B).
When the same crystal was warmed to 200 K and then to 300K (120 K/hr), the crystal was again found in the monoclinic crystal system in space group C2/c. The axial imidazole, dioxygen ligand and the pickets display increasingly serious disorder as the temperature is increased as displayed in Figure 1; the occupancy ratios of the fourfold disordered dioxygen ligands are 0.41:0.09 (200K) and 0.27:0.23 (300K).
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2]
When crystalline [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] is exposed to oxygen at 1 atmosphere, the five-coordinate complex becomes partially oxygenated. The crystal structure analysis suggests that the oxygenation reaction is about 40% complete. Oxygenation at 5 atm. leads to complete oxygenation, [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)], that retains all oxygen at 100 K, but molecular oxygen is slowly lost from the single crystal at temperatures above ~200 K. The structure determined at 300 K showed about 30% occupancy of the remaining coordinated O2. The complex can be completely deoxygenated and the structure of such a crystal shows no apparent degradation. A brief summary of the crystallographic data of the 2-MeHIm structures is given in Table 2 and complete crystallographic details, atomic coordinates, bond distances, and bond angles of these four structures are given in Tables S25–S48 of the Supporting Information.
Table 2.
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm) 0.4(O2)]·2C2H5OH | [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm) (O2)]·1.8C2H5OH | [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm) 0.3(O2)]·1.8C2H5OH | [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm) ·1.8C2H5OH | |
---|---|---|---|---|
chemical formula | C72H82CoN10O6.8 | C71.6H80.8CoN10O7.8 | C71.6H80.8CoN10O6.4 | C71.6H82CoN10O5.8 |
FW | 1255.21 | 1265.19 | 1242.79 | 1234.40 |
a, Å | 18.5678(7) | 18.7514(3) | 18.9063(5) | 18.6326(3) |
b, Å | 19.5594(8) | 19.5309(3) | 19.6633(5) | 19.6158(3) |
c, Å | 17.8219(6) | 17.8719(3) | 18.3473(5) | 17.9050(3) |
α, deg | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
β, deg | 90.954(2) | 91.065(1) | 91.666(1) | 90.879(1) |
γ, deg | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
V, Å3 | 6471.6(4) | 6544.13(18) | 6817.9(3) | 6543.39(18) |
space group | C2/c | C2/c | C2/c | C2/c |
Z | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
temp, K | 100 | 100 | 300 | 100 |
Dcalcd, g cm−3 | 1.288 | 1.284 | 1.211 | 1.253 |
μ, mm−1 | 0.328 | 0.326 | 0.310 | 0.322 |
final R indices | R1 = 0.0509 | R1 = 0.0559 | R1 = 0.0758 | R1 = 0.0572 |
[I > 2σ(I)] | wR2 = 0.1399 | wR2 = 0.1591 | wR2 = 0.2301 | wR2 = 0.1633 |
final R indices | R1 = 0.0593 | R1 = 0.0676 | R1 = 0.1219 | R1 = 0.0733 |
(all data) | wR2 = 0.1512 | wR2 = 0.1703 | wR2 = 0.2646 | wR2 = 0.1776 |
Discussion
The picket fence dioxygen complexes have crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry leading to disorder of the bent dioxygen ligand and the trans imidazole ligand. In addition, a second crystallographically independent position of the dioxygen is found. Thus the coordinated dioxygen displays fourfold disorder and the trans imidazole twofold disorder. Interestingly, the disorder of the pickets, found in the dioxygen picket fence complexes, is not a common phenomenon with pocket ligands other than dioxygen, suggesting that the pickets are not “inert” with respect to the dioxygen ligand.
Even though an individual single-crystal X-ray analysis cannot discriminate between crystalline disorder caused by static phenomena or by dynamic processes occurring in the solid state, the use of multiple-temperature structure determinations on the same single-crystal specimen can yield substantial insight into the nature of possible dynamic processes. A series of iron(II) nitrosyl complexes showed how multiple-temperature X-ray structures could provide significant information into the pathways of NO ligand motion.8, 9 The striking success of the NO studies led us to carry out multiple-temperature studies of picket fence dioxygen complexes at a variety of temperatures from ambient down to 80–100 K. We have examined the structures of the cobalt(II) species on the expectation that useful information concerning the solid-state dynamics of the O2 complexes would be obtained.
Structure of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]
The structure of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] has been independently determined four times with differing temperatures and thermal treatments, but all on the same crystal specimen. As shown in Table 3, the coordination group geometry parameters do not vary largely. Most of the differences are likely the consequence of the disorder issues described below, which do vary widely; values are given in Table 3. As will be discussed subsequently, some aspects of the thermal behavior were further studied on a second crystalline specimen that confirmed the general behavior.
Table 3.
compound | Cryst. Form | T, K | Co–Oa | Co–Npa,b | Co–NIma | O–Oa | Co–O–Oc | O–Co–NImc | Picket Config.d | No. Imid. Orient.e | No. O2 Orient.f |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Related to [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
[Co(TPP)(1-MeIm)]g | – | 295 | – | 1.977(6) | 2.157(3) | – | – | – | – | 1 | – |
[Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] | P1̄ form | 100 | 1.9029(19) | 1.978(3) | 2.017(2) | 1.239(3) 1.048(12) |
120.3(2) 131.7(8) |
178.20(11) | 4Ord | 1 | 2 |
[Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] | C2/c form | 100 | 1.899(2) | 1.9895(6) | 2.032(2) | 1.116(4) | 127.5(2) | 173.44(11)h | 4Dis | 2 | 2 |
[Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] | C2/c form | 200 | 1.899(2) | 1.9739(2) | 2.0293(18) | 1.131(5) 1.13(2) |
127.4(3) 128.7(14) |
173.71(8)h | 4Dis | 2 | 4 |
[Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] | C2/c form | 300 | 1.942(4) | 1.980(2) | 2.046(2) | 1.129(9) 1.16(2) |
128.0(6) 135.3(17) |
180h,i | 4Dis | 2 | 4 |
[Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]#2 | P1̄ form | 80 | 1.929(6) | 1.982(9) | 2.029(6) | 1.233(13) 1.02(4) |
122.0(8) 131(2) |
179.2(4) – |
4Ord | 1 | 2 |
| |||||||||||
B. Related to [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)] | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)]j | C2/c form | 100 | – | 1.979(3) | 2.145(3) | – | – | – | 4Ord | 2 | – |
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)0.4(O2)] | C2/c form | 100 | 1.934(6) | 1.9751(12) | 2.108(3) | 1.100(9) | 128.8(6) | 173.81(15)h | 4Ord | 2 | 2 |
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)] | C2/c form | 100 | 1.902(2) | 1.9850(16) | 2.078(2) | 1.110(4) | 128.8(2) | 173.93(8)h | 4Dis | 2 | 2 |
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)0.3(O2)] | C2/c form | 300 | 1.993(9) | 1.986(3) | 2.153(5) | 0.98(2) | 139.3(16) | 173.10(16)h | 4Ord? | 2 | 2 |
[Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] | C2/c form | 100 | – | 1.983(4) | 2.158(3) | – | – | – | 4Ord | 2 | – |
[Co(TPP)(1,2-Me2Im)]k | – | 295 | – | 1.985(3) | 2.216(2) | – | – | – | – | 1 | – |
Values in Å.
Averaged value.
Values in degrees.
Number of pickets ordered (Ord) and/or disordered (Dis).
Number of imidazole orientations.
Number of O2 orientations.
Values from Ref. 54
The differences between 180° and the observed angle represents the off-axis tilt of the imidazole.
Not resolved.
Values from Ref. 12.
Values from Ref. 55.
When a freshly prepared crystal of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] is subjected to X-ray structure analysis using what are now routine, modern-day techniques, i.e., flash cooling the crystal to low temperature (typically 100 K) and then commencing the diffraction study, the crystals are observed in the space group C2/c. This space group leads to crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry and leading to twofold disorder in both axial ligands. However, unlike prior iron results,20,21 the terminal oxygen is found only in the pair of positions related by the molecular twofold axis and not in another set of positions that led to effectively fourfold disorder. Apparently, the relatively small differences between the M–O2 bonding of the cobalt dioxygen species and the analogous iron species leads to a significant difference in the disorder (dynamics) of the complexes.
A top down view of the cobalt complex is given in the left panel of Figure 2; additional thermal ellipsoid plots are given in Figures S2 and S3. As can be seen in the left panel, even though the O2 only exhibits twofold disorder, all pickets are disordered with each having two distinct orientations of the t-butyl group; none of the picket disorder is a consequence of the crystallographic symmetry. Moreover, although there is no necessary crystallographic correlation between the orientational disorder of the pickets and the coordinated O2, calculations suggested that picket behavior is intrinsically related to the oxygen ligand dynamics.22 A close examination of Figure 2, or better Figure S2, shows details of the orientations of the t-butyl groups. The disordered t-butyl groups pointing towards the oxygen have two methyl groups oriented inward to the pocket cavity whereas the picket at the other site has only one methyl group inward to the pocket cavity. Each of the independent t-butyl groups has two distinct but similar orientations, but the two pickets show distinct patterns. We will represent the orientation of the t-butyl groups with the symbol “<o” for those with the two methyl groups inward and bracketing the oxygen and those with the single inward methyl group as “>.”
The two sets of orientations of the two inward methyl groups (<o) interact almost equally with the terminal oxygen atom, effectively on each side of the oxygen. The contacts are O2· · ·C27 = 3.26 Å and O2 · · ·C25 = 4.41 Å for the first picket orientation and O2 · · ·C25b = 3.33 Å and O2 · · ·C27b = 4.02 Å for the second picket orientation. There is an equivalent set of such interactions 180° away as required by the twofold symmetry. The short O· · ·C distances are very near the van der Waals radii sum of 3.22 Å.23 The second set of disordered pickets have a single inward methyl group (>) and their positions are not directly affected by the presence of the oxygen ligand. Note that additional details of the picket interactions are given in the Supporting Information Figures as appropriate.
The <o orientation has been commonly observed when the pocket ligand is not linear, for example, N-coordinated nitrite. In a number of iron(II) and -(III) nitrite picket fence derivatives,24 the terminal nitrite oxygen atoms are bracketed by two methyl groups, but the pickets are completely ordered with a single orientation. One possible explanation for the two orientations of the picket bracketing the terminal oxygen of the coordinated O2 is that any rotation of O2 around the Co–O bond must be correlated with picket motion. That such an O2 rotation must be occurring in the solid state is shown by the experiments described below.
The disorder of the pickets, the O2 and even the trans imidazole ligand is shown to be variable by the structures obtained at different temperatures and cooling conditions. As described in Figure 1 and the Experimental, when the crystal was annealed after cooling to 100 K, warming to 188 K, and then slowly recooling to 100 K, substantial structural change occurred. The crystallographic space group changed to P1̄, leading to no required symmetry on the molecule, and the molecule itself is almost completely ordered. The four pickets all have a single orientation, the imidazole has a single orientation and not the two previously required. The coordinated oxygen molecule still has two orientations, but the terminal atom occupancies are decidedly asymmetric with occupancies of the major (O2a) atom at 0.816 (7) and the minor (O2b) at 0.184. The two Co–O–O planes are not quite coplanar. These features are all clearly seen in Figure 2 (right panel) and Figures S4 and S5. The picket orientation follows the same pattern as noted before (<o towards oxygen and > for the other pair), with comparable short C· · ·O contacts (for O2a = 3.34 Å and O2b = 3.21 Å). In both 100 K structures, the Co–O–O planes have a near-perpendicular conformation with respect to the imidazole plane suggesting that this orientation is the most favored one. Clearly both the O2 and imidazole groups have rotated around their coordinating bond during the annealing process. The rotation around the Co–O bond (in either direction) requires that the picket methyl groups must also move to lower the barrier. Thus the dynamics and energetics of O2 rotation depends on two distinct molecular features: the barrier to rotation around the Co–O bond and energy required for the necessary movement of the pickets. It is likely that the picket disorder, which is seen as alternate orientations of the t-butyl groups, is the likely “residue” from the Co–O2 rotation. Correlated motion of the pickets and O2 in a geared fashion are required in order to avoid impossible atom · · · atom contacts; the differing positions of the t-butyl groups must be nearly energetically equivalent. However, the energetics of the picket orientation will depend on whether or not there is an O2 ligand in proximity.
Additional interesting structural features are observed when the crystal is warmed to 200 K, which was accomplished without removal from the diffractometer. The space group reverts back to C2/c, with required twofold symmetry for the molecule, and the complex is again disordered. Indeed, additional disorder is observed with four terminal oxygen positions with the unique occupancy factors of 0.412 (11) and 0.088. The major occupancy Co–O–O planes remain nearly perpendicular to the imidazole plane. The features are illustrated in Figures 1, S6, and S7. The pickets associated with the major occupancy terminal oxygen again display a pair of <o conformations with the closest O· · ·C contacts of 3.31 and 3.26 Å. Picket conformations associated with the minor occupancy oxygen atom are more complex, with both a <o and a > conformation. The nonbonded contact with the terminal oxygen and the closest carbon of the <o conformation is 3.14 Å, whereas the apparent O· · ·C contact with the > picket conformation is an impossible 2.50 Å. It is be noted that the apparent thermal motion of the minor occupancy oxygen atom is much more diffuse than the major occupancy oxygen atom. It is not clear whether this is a real phenomenon or an artifact of the least-squares refinement. We prefer the first explanation.
Further warming to 300 K continues the trend to increasing disorder. Figures 1, S8, and S9 display two views of the molecule. The terminal oxygen atoms again occupy four sites, but now have nearly equal populations of 0.27 (2):0.23:0.27:0.23. The orientation of the pickets is also more diffuse. The orientations of the pickets for the (marginally) major orientation O2a are now less clear, one is clearly <o but the other orientation verges on >; the close O· · ·C contacts are 3.58 and 3.79 Å for the first picket orientation and 2.70 Å for the second. The picket orientations associated the second oxygen atom (O2b) are both close to the > conformation and with a calculated shortest contacts of 2.59 and 2.98 Å. Although the thermal parameters (or more precisely the anisotropic displacement parameters) for all atoms have increased over the temperature range, those of the picket methyl groups have especially increased. As can be seen in Figure S8, the appearance of these thermal parameters suggests a near continuum of varying methyl group positions about the Ct–butyl–Camide bond and effectively appears close to free rotation at 300 K. The apparent easy movement of the pickets may be the reason that the oxygen atom occupancies are now near a statistical 0.25.
We have studied the reproducibility and other variations of the crystal annealing process on a second, independently prepared crystal of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]. The sequence of conditions used to explore this temperature variability is given in Figure S10. The basic observations that were described above were found again. Flash cooling gave a crystal in space group C2/c with, as before, two orientations of the terminal oxygen atom. Annealing again gave a phase change and space group P1̄, with two asymmetrically occupied oxygen positions; however, disorder in all the pickets and a disordered imidazole was observed. Further annealing cycles, as shown in Figure S10, were followed by a final structure determination at 80 K. This result was nearly identical to the 100 K structure noted earlier, with ordered pickets, imidazole and asymmetric oxygen atom occupancies of 0.77(2) and 0.23, the O2 occupancies are within two standard deviations of the first determination. An illustration of this independently determined structure is given in Figure S11.
We conclude that, in the absence of external constraints, the bent Co-O-O group would be equally populated in all four of the quadrants of the porphyrin core with jumps between each quadrant.25 The temperature-dependent crystallographic studies of the picket fence derivatives clearly demonstrate that the location of the dioxygen ligand is the result of the constraints of the intramolecular interactions between the dioxygen and pickets. These constraints must control the oxygen motion and populations, with the constraints relaxing as the temperature increases. Although the lowest temperature structure after annealing is almost completely ordered, it is possible that more elaborate temperature cycling than we have been able to employ would lead to a single ordered Co-O2 orientation.
Despite the variation of differing interactions in the ligand binding pocket in the four structures determined, the complex displays the same core conformation that indeed are almost quantitatively identical for all four structures. This is true even for the pair at 100 K that have undergone the phase change. Formal diagrams illustrating the atomic displacements, in units of 0.01 Å, from the mean 24-atom plane of the porphyrin are given in Figure S12. One interesting feature is that the cobalt atom is always slightly displaced from the mean plane towards the imidazole ligand and not the dioxygen ligand. Also shown are the averaged values of bond distances and angles in each of the four observed structures along with the value of the estimated standard deviation, calculated on the assumption that all averaged values are drawn from the same population.
Values of coordination group parameters, those for coordinated O2, and picket configuration are summarized in Table 3. Figure S12 gives values for core distances and angles and also displays the relative orientation of the axial ligands. The coordination group values compare well with those from earlier structure determinations of dioxygen cobalt complexes. The first X-ray characterized monomeric oxygen-carrying cobalt complex is the six-coordinate [Co(beacen)(Py)(O2)], reported at 1972 as a model for oxygenated hemoglobin.26 The Co–O2 distance and Co–O2 angle were determined as 1.86 Å and 126°. Since then a number of cobalt-O2 (1:1) structures are published, most of which are also ligated to a Schiff base.27–32 In these cobalt dioxygen structures, the O2 group is frequently disordered.29 In the relatively accurate low-temperature structures by Schaefer et al., the Co–O2 distance and Co–O2 angle are in the ranges of 1.870(6) ~ 1.889(2) Å and 116.4(5) ~ 120.0(2)°.29–32 The dioxygen group is positioned between the Co–O and Co–N bonds,30 or bisects the N–Co–N angle of the Schiff base ligand.26 Either arrangement allows for good overlap between π* orbitals on the dioxygen group and dπ orbitals on the cobalt atom. There is a single oxycobalt porphyrin structure, also based on picket fence, but with a trans thiolate ligand has limited precision with a twofold disordered oxygen ligand.33 Agreement between the differing oxycobalt structures is satisfactory.
The nearly complete ordering of the dioxygen ligand allows, for the first time to our knowledge, the possibility of looking for subtle asymmetry, caused by the O2 ligand, in the structure of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]. Such asymmetry (an off-axis tilt of the diatomic ligand and unequal equatorial bond distances) had been observed in both five-coordinate34, 35 and six-coordinate iron nitrosyls8, 9 and five-coordinate cobalt nitrosyls.36 An off-axis tilt of 8° in oxyCoMb has been deduced from EPR measurements,37 but possibly in a different sense than that seen here. The Co–O2 bond is tilted off the normal to the porphyrin plane by 2.7°. The two Co–Np bonds in the direction of the tilt are 1.9752 (20) and 1.9756 (21) Å (average 1.9754 (3) Å), whereas the two Co–Np bonds opposite the tilt are 1.9784 (20) and 1.9814 (21) Å (average = 1.9802 (18) A). The differences, while only marginally statistically significant, are strongly suggestive given the clear evidence of the phenomenon observed in the NO complexes. It is to be recognized that the similarities of O2 and NO as ligands has long been noted.38, 39
The top portion of Scheme 1 pictorially summarizes the coordination group geometry of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] determined at differing conditions. The scheme also provides a comparison of the cobalt oxygen structures with that reported previously for the analogous iron derivative (determined at 297 K).40 The lower portion of Scheme 1 illustrates the relative orientations of the imidazole and the bent M–O2 ligand with respect to the orientation of the M–Np directions of the porphyrin core. Bisecting oxygen orientations are found for both cobalt and iron, but significant ordering of the O2 position can be observed only in the cobalt systems. It can be noted that the orientation of the axial ligands shows small systematic shifts as this cobalt system is warmed (left to right, first four panels). The favored orientation of the axial O2 ligand appears to approach that of exactly bisecting the bracketing Co–Np bonds, whereas the imidazole orientation tends towards eclipsing a Co–Np bond. The orientation of the major Co-O–O plane is approximately perpendicular to the imidazole plane with dihedral angles between 71 and 80°. This favored orientation may reflect modest π donation from the trans imidazole. The iron system shows a similar preference for the relative orientation of the Fe–O–O plane and the imidazole plane.
The bonding between the metal and the dioxygen ligand is expected to be qualitatively similar in the iron and cobalt derivatives. With the bent, end on (Pauling model) structure, bonding involves the two π* orbitals on O2 with the dz2 and one of the metal dπ orbitals. Overlap of dz2 and one π* orbital leads to the σ bond and overlap of the other π* orbital with a metal dπ leads to the M–O2 π bond. The singly occupied dz2 orbital in cobalt leads to significant charge donation to O2 and the formulation of a superoxide species. This is clearly supported by the EPR spectra41, 42 that indicates that the unpaired electron resides in a π* antibonding molecular orbital predominantly localized on dioxygen.43 The possible formulation of the oxyiron complexes as has been more contentious starting from the Pauling/Weiss debate44, 45 and continuing to the present time.43b,46, 47
The bond between iron and oxygen is a stronger bond than that in the cobalt system (M–O2 is 0.15 Å shorter in iron) and reflects a significantly stronger π bond in the iron systems. This is clearly shown not only by the distance but by the M–O2 stretching frequencies. The Co–O stretch (ν(Co–O)) observed in both oxyCoMb (538 cm−1) and [Co(TpivPP)(1-MeIm)(O2)] (516 cm−1) can be compared to ν(Fe–O) in oxyFeMb (570 cm−1) and [Fe(TpivPP)(1-MeIm)(O2)] (568 cm−1).46, 48 Both the lower ν(M–O) and ν(O–O)49 in oxyCoMb and small molecule analogs compared to iron suggests that the net negative charge on the coordinated dioxygen is smaller in the iron species than in the cobalt species.50 In addition DFT calculation indicated that the interaction between the distal histidine and the oxygen ligand in oxyCoMb and oxyMb is stronger for the cobalt complex than for the iron one, consistent with larger superoxide ion character of the bound O2 in cobalt.25 Thus it can be expected that the higher negative charge on “Co(III)–O2−” would induce larger dipole-dipole interactions between the terminal oxygen atom and the picket amides, and result in less ligand oscillation and picket orientational disorder. This has been observed in a series of iron and cobalt oxygen basket handle derivatives where the the cobalt derivatives are more sensitive to changes in the basket sizes.51 It is most clearly observed in a porphyrin system where EPR showed much reduced mobility of the Co–O2 when a single amide group, similar to those in picket fence porphyrin, was present.6a Although hydrogen bonding was suggested, the geometry is much more in line with a dipole-dipole interaction.6a
In situ reversible oxygenation reactions of [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)]
We have previously reported the synthesis and structural characterization of five-coordinate [Co(TpivPP)-(2-MeHIm)],12 the precursor to the six-coordinate oxygen derivative. However, the reaction of [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] with O2 in benzene in the presence of a small amount of ethanol unexpectedly gave two different crystalline forms of a cobalt(III) product and not the desired dioxygen adduct. The photocatalyzed reaction leads to [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(2-MeIm−)] with the deprotonation of one imidazole providing charge balance. More surprising is the atropisomerization of the α, α, α, α isomer to yield [Co(III)(α, α,β,β-TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(2-MeIm−)]. This change in conformation of the porphyrin allows for a hydrogen bonding chain in the axial ligands.12
Solid-state oxygenation reactions with single-crystal [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] were then carried out. The reaction with ethanol-saturated O2 at 1 atmosphere, conditions similar to the reaction conditions for the preparation of [Fe(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)],21 gave a crystalline product, but only with a partial O2 occupancy. The structure determination suggested that the occupancy of coordinated dioxygen in the product was about 0.4. This is similar to the solid-state oxygenation of the B12 derivative cob(II)alamin, which was about 70% oxygenated under similar conditions.52 These results are consistent with the known, lower, oxygen affinity of CoMb and the cobalt picket fence derivative compared to the iron analogues.11,53 A fully occupied oxygen ligand and a satisfactory crystallographic refinement for [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)] can be obtained by exposure of the crystals to 5 atmospheres of oxygen for 5 days.
Further information on the dynamics of the system is provided by warming the crystal to 300 K under an N2 stream after the 100 K data collection. A significant amount of the dioxygen is lost as the oxygen occupancy decreases to 0.3 as the temperature increased. Large thermal motion for the pickets and the dioxygen ligand are seen for the refined crystal structure. The large apparent thermal motion of the dioxygen ligands is almost certainly hiding fourfold disorder. The large thermal motion of picket atoms is also probably obscuring significant disorder of the pickets. The same crystal was then kept in a pure argon atmosphere with EtOH vapor preventing the loss of solvent. After several cycles of moderate pump and refill with solvent saturated argon, the crystal characterization showed that oxygen was totally removed and the five-coordinate [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] precursor was recovered. The packing diagrams of Figure S13 illustrate the observations.
There are interesting differences in the pickets in these crystalline species. The five-coordinate precursor, in two independent determinations, has completely ordered pickets; this ordering is retained in the first partially oxygenated species. Full oxygenation, however, leads to all pickets now disordered with all pickets displaying two differing orientations. When part of the O2 is lost at 300 K, the situation is ambiguous. Large thermal motion is probably hiding disordered pickets and almost certainly a fourfold disordered dioxygen. Complete loss of the dioxygen leads to a fully ordered five-coordinate derivative. This can be clearly seen in the thermal ellipsoid plots given in Figure 3, where the reaction sequences are shown and all thermal ellipsoids are scaled to the 50% probability level. Additional thermal ellipsoid plots are given in Figures S14 to S21.
Structure of [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] and its oxygen adducts
A summary of structural results for [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] and its oxygen adducts under various conditions is given in Table 3 (Part B). All of these species are low spin S = 1/2. The first entry in Part B gives the structural parameters for the five-coordinate complex before any oxygenation reaction. The next to final entry give the structural parameters for a second five-coordinate crystalline sample after it had been oxygenated and then deoxygenated. We conclude that [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] can be oxygenated/deoxygenated without significant change in crystallinity, circumstances that are not always the case.
The structure of the five-coordinate precursor is typical of previously characterized five-coordinate imidazole-ligated cobalt porphyrinates.54–57 The sterically hindered 2-methylimidazole ligand had been expected to cause a modest increase in the value of the axial bond as had been observed and discussed55 in [Co(TPP)(1,2-Me2Im)] (observed 2.216 (2) Å). However, as noted previously,12 in the picket fence derivative the axial bond length does not show such an elongation. The observed distances of (2.145(3) and 2.1593(3) Å falls in the range observed for sterically nonhindered imidazoles; the out-of-plane displacement is also within the range previously seen.
The changes in structure upon oxygenation are shown in the top line of Scheme 2 and in Table 3. The out-of-plane cobalt displacement decreases but does not decrease to zero; the cobalt remains on the imidazole side of the porphyrin plane. The axial Co–N(Im) bond decreases to 2.078 Å, consistent with expectations of a formulation, but does not decrease to the 2.02 to 2.03 Å-value seen in the 1-EtIm derivatives (Table 3, Part A). The values of the Co–O and other O2 parameters are seen to be very similar to those observed for the 1-EtIm derivative and, as discussed previously, other oxycobalt complexes as well. The limiting structures of the 1-EtIm and 2-MeHIm complexes both show one Co–O2 orientation which is aligned nearly perpendicular to imidazole plane. The differences in structure between [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)] and its oxy derivative are very similar to the differences found for deoxyCoMb and its oxy form.58 Both the differences in the out-of-plane displacement and the change in the axial bond distance are slightly smaller in the picket fence derivatives.
The second line of Scheme 2 gives the structural parameters for the oxygenation product when the oxygenation was carried out at 1 atm of O2 and only partial oxygenation resulted. Two significant features resulted. At this level of oxygenation, the twofold axis of symmetry remains and requires two positions for the terminal oxygen and two orientations of the axial 2-MeHIm ligand. Moreover, the relative orientations of the axial ligands are the same as in the fully oxygenated derivative. However, the pickets remain completely ordered. Further oxygenation does lead to disorder in all pickets. These include the pickets that are directly pointing to the terminal oxygen atom as well as the pair of pickets that are orthogonal to the Co–O2 plane. See Figures S14–S17 for detailed views. This clearly suggests that the influence of the oxygen ligand on the pickets is, at least in part, nondirectional. The interaction must be dipole–dipole in character as the distances to the picket amides is beyond that expected for hydrogen bonding. The O· · ·N distances are in the range of 4.0 – 4.1 Å and the O · · ·H(N) distances are in the range of >~3.2 Å. Calculations by Rovira and Parrinello22 have indicated that the pickets provide substantial energetic stabilization for the binding of O2. However, the energetics of the varying Co–O–O orientations and the picket orientations must be very similar.
Scheme 2 also illustrates the probable effect on the experimentally derived structural parameters when the crystalline sample is a mixture of the six-coordinate species and the five-coordinate precursor. The apparent metal ion displacement is between the two limiting values and the apparent values of both axial bond distances are longer than the true values. The effects are substantial and the observations for the cobalt system can be expected to be the general result.
Comparison of R- and T-state oxy models
The movement of iron toward the porphyrin plane upon oxygenation, along with the motion of proximal histidine, has been cited as the driving force in the mechanism of cooperative oxygen binding in the human hemoglobin.59, 60 The movements of iron and the proximal histidine lead to changes in protein quaternary structure of hemoglobin that leads to the cooperativity of oxygen binding. Cooperativity is retained, but diminished, in human hemoglobin when the iron is replaced with cobalt; the Hill coefficient decreases from 2.8 to 2.2.61 The difference is attributed to the fact that the Co out-of-plane displacement and subsequent movement upon oxygenation will be much smaller than that for iron since cobalt does not undergo a spin state change.62 However, it is essential to note that the binding of dioxygen does lead to significant different changes in model R- and T-state cobalt systems on the change from a five-coordinate to a six-coordinate species. In both [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] and [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)] the change in the out-of-plane displacement of cobalt is about 0.08 Å with the cobalt remaining further out-of-plane in the 2-MeHIm system. But, the change in the the axial Co–N(Im) bond distance is almost twice as large in [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)]. The total change leads to half again as much motion of the axial imidazole relative to the porphyrin plane in this R-state model (0.23 Å change in the R-state system vs. 0.16 Å in T-state system).
Summary
Two different O2 complexes of picket fence cobalt porphyrin, [Co(TpivPP)(R-Im)(O2)] where R-Im is either 1-ethylimidazole or the sterically hindered 2-methylimidazole, have been synthesized. The solid-state structures of the two species have been determined at a number of temperatures. Under most conditions, both axial ligands and the pickets of the porphyrin are disordered. However, crystal annealing leads to an unusual reversible phase change for [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)] that provides an ordered structure and excellent structural parameters. The studies have provided distinct information on the interactions between the coordinated O2 and pickets that lead to apparent mutual disorder in the solid state. The disordered pickets apparently result from the movement required to allow rotation of the O2 ligand about the Co–O bond. The results also reveal the subtle effects on structural parameters from an incomplete oxygenation reaction in the single crystal.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Institutes of Health for support of this research under Grant GM-38401 to W.R.S..
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available. Figure S1, line drawing of [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)-(O2)], Figures S2 to S22 give thermal ellipsoid plots and mean plane diagrams for all structures. Brief description of synthesis of PF porphyrin. Tables S1–S24 give complete structural details for [Co(TpivPP)(1-EtIm)(O2)], Tables S25–S42 give complete structural details for [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)(O2)] and Tables S43–S48 give complete structural details for [Co(TpivPP)(2-MeHIm)]. Crystallographic information files (CIF) are also available. Ordering information is given on any current masthead page. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References and Notes
- 1.Ghosh A, editor. The Smallest Biomolecules: Diatomics and Their Interactions with Heme Proteins. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Debrunner PG. In: Iron Porphyrins, part 3. Lever ABP, Gray HB, editors. VCH Publishers; New York: 1989. pp. 177–181. [Google Scholar]; (b) Boso B, Debrunner PG, Wagner GC, Inubushi T. Biochim Biophys. 1984;791:244. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(84)90015-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Winkler H. Hyperfine Int. 2002;199/200:199. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abbreviations: Np, porphyrinato nitrogen; NAx, nitrogen of axial ligands; M: center metal atom; Nim, nitrogen of imidazole ligands; Δ24: displacement of metal atom from the 24-atom mean plane; EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance. Mb, Myoglobin; TpivPP, dianion of α, α, α, α-tetrakis(o-pivalamidophenyl)porphyrin; 1-MeIm, 1-methylimidazole; 1-EtIm, 1-ethylimidazole; 2-MeHIm, 2-methylimidazole; R-Im, generalized imidazole; Py, pyridine; Mb, myoglobin; Hb, hemoglobin; CoMb, cobalt substituted myoglobin; CoHb, cobalt substituted hemoglobin.
- 4.Spartalian K, Lang G, Collman JP, Gagne RR, Reed CA. J Chem Phys. 1975;63:5375. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Godbout N, Sanders LK, Salzmann R, Havlin RH, Wojdelski M, Oldfield E. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:3829. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Walker FA, Bowen J. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:7632. [Google Scholar]; (b) Odo J, Imai H, Kyuno E, Nakamoto K. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:742. [Google Scholar]; (c) Dube H, Kasumaj B, Calle C, Saito M, Jeschke G, Diederich F. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:2600. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bowen JH, Shokhirev NV, Raitsimring AM, Buttlaire DH, Walker FA. J Chem Phys B. 1997;101:8683. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Silvernail NJ, Pavlik JW, Noll BC, Schulz CE, Scheidt WR. Inorg Chem. 2008;47:912–920. doi: 10.1021/ic701700p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Silvernail NJ, Barabanschikov A, Sage JT, Noll BC, Scheidt WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2131–2140. doi: 10.1021/ja8055613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li J, Noll BC, Oliver AG, Schulz CE, Scheidt WR. manuscripts in preparation.. Structural data for three [Fe(TpivPP)(R-Im)(O2)] derivatives (R-Im = 1- MeIm, 1-EtIm and 2-MeHIm) at temperatures between 100 and 300 K have been obtained. At 100K, all structures are in C2/c and show fourfold positional disorder at the terminal oxygen (O2). Systematically temperature-dependent Mössbauer spectroscopy have been conducted on [Fe(TpivPP)(R-Im)(O2)] (R-Im =1-MeIm, 1-EtIm and 2-MeHIm).
- 11.Collman JP, Brauman JI, Doxsee KM, Halbert TR, Hayes SE, Suslick KS. J Am Chem Soc. 1978;100:2761. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li J, Noll BC, Oliver AG, Ferraudi G, Lappin AG, Scheidt WR. Inorg Chem. 2010;49:2398. doi: 10.1021/ic902309f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sheldrick GM. Acta Cryst. 2008;A64:112. [Google Scholar]
- 14.R1 = Σ||Fo| − |Fc ||/Σ|Fo| and wR2 ={Σ[w(Fo 2 − Fc2)2]/Σ[wFo4]}1/2. The conventional R-factors R1 are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The criterion of F2 > 2σ(F2) was used only for calculating R1. R-factors based on F2(wR2) are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
- 15.Sheldrick GM. Program for empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data. Universität Göttingen; Germany: 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sheldrick GM. twinabs. Universität Göttingen; Germany: 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Macrae CF, Edgington PR, McCabe P, Pidcock E, Shields GP, Taylor R, Towler M, van de Streek J. J Appl Cryst. 2006;39:453. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bruno IJ, Cole JC, Edgington PR, Kessler MK, Macrae CF, McCabe P, Pearson J, Taylor R. Acta Crystallogr. 2002;B58:389. doi: 10.1107/s0108768102003324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Taylor R, Macrae CF. Acta Crystallogr. 2001;B57:815. doi: 10.1107/S010876810101360X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hu C, Roth A, Ellison MK, An J, Ellis CM, Schulz CE, Scheidt WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:5675. doi: 10.1021/ja044077p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kitazawa T, Nishikiori S-I, Kuroda R, Iwamoto T. J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans. 1994;1994:1029. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jameson GB, Rodley GA, Robinson WT, Gagne RR, Reed CA, Collman JP. Inorg Chem. 1978;17:850. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jameson GB, Molinaro FS, Ibers JA, Collman JP, Brauman JI, Rose E, Suslick KS. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102:3224. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rovira C, Parrinello M. Chem Eur J. 1999;5:250. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bondi A. J Phys Chem. 1964;68:441. [Google Scholar]
- 24.(a) Nasri H, Goodwin JA, Scheidt WR. Inorg Chem. 1990;29:185. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nasri H, Wang Y, Huynh BH, Scheidt WR. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:717. [Google Scholar]; (c) Nasri H, Wang Y, Huynh BH, Walker FA, Scheidt WR. Inorg Chem. 1991;30:1483. [Google Scholar]; (d) Nasri H, Haller KJ, Wang Y, Huynh BH, Scheidt WR. Inorg Chem. 1992;31:3459. [Google Scholar]; (e) Nasri H, Ellison MK, Chen S, Huynh BH, Scheidt WR. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:6274. [Google Scholar]; (f) Nasri H, Ellison MK, Krebs C, Huynh BH, Scheidt WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:10795. [Google Scholar]; (g) Nasri H, Ellison MK, Shang M, Schulz CE, Scheidt WR. Inorg Chem. 2004;43:2932. doi: 10.1021/ic035119y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Degtyarenko I, Nieminen RM, Rovira C. Biophys J. 2006;91:2024. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.083048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rodley GA, Robinson WT. Nature. 1972;235:438. doi: 10.1038/235438a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Calligaris M, Nardin G, Randaccio L. J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans. 1973:419. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jameson GB, Robinson WT, Rodley GA. J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans. 1978:191. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gall RS, Rogers JF, Schaefer WP, Christoph GG. J Am Chem Soc. 1976;98:5135. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gall RS, Rogers JF, Schaefer WP, Christoph GG. Inorg Chem. 1980;19:340. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Avdeef A, Schaefer WP. J Am Chem Soc. 1976;98:5153. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gall RS, Schaefer WP. Inorg Chem. 1976;15:2758. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Doppelt P, Fischer J, Richard L, Weiss R. Nouv J Chim. 1987;11:357. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ellison MK, Scheidt WR. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:7404. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Scheidt WR, Duval HF, Neal TJ, Ellison MK. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:4651. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ellison MK, Scheidt WR. Inorg Chem. 1998;37:382. doi: 10.1021/ic971109j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hori H, Ikeda-Saiton M, Yonetai T. Nature. 1980;288:501. doi: 10.1038/288501a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Scheidt WR, Hoard JL. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:8281. doi: 10.1021/ja00806a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schenk G, Pau MYM, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:505. doi: 10.1021/ja036715u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.We have carried out a number of multiple-temperature structure determinations for [Fe(TpivPP)(R-Im)(O2)] derivatives.10 In most cases, the O2 ligand is disordered over four positions.
- 41.Walker FA. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92:4235. [Google Scholar]
- 42.(a) Hoffman BM, Diemente DL, Basolo F. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92:61. [Google Scholar]; (b) Getz D, Melemud E, Silver BC, Dori Z. J Am Chem Soc. 1975;97:3846. [Google Scholar]
- 43.(a) Wayland BB, Minkiewixz JV, Abd-Elmageed ME. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:2795. [Google Scholar]; (b) Dedieu A, Rohmer MM, Veillard A. J Am Chem Soc. 1976;98:5789. doi: 10.1021/ja00428a060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Reed CA, Cheung SK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:1780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.5.1780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pauling L. Nature. 1964;203:182. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Weiss JJ. Nature. 1964;202:84. doi: 10.1038/202083b0. ibid. 1964, 203, 183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Burke JM, Kincaid JR, Peters S, Gagne RR, Collman JP, Spiro TG. J Am Chem Soc. 1978;100:6083. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen H, Ikeda-Saito M, Shaik S. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14778. doi: 10.1021/ja805434m. This reference details additional information on the debate. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.(a) Tsubaki M, Yu NT. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:3581. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mackin HC, Tsubaki M, Yu NT. Biophys J. 1983;41:349. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84446-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Collman JP, Brauman JI, Halbert TR, Suslick KS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1976;73:3333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.10.3333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nakamoto K, Paeng IR, Kuroi T, Isobe T, Oshio H. J Mol Struct. 1988;189:293. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Collman JP, Zhang X, Wong K, Braumkna JL. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:6245. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hohenester E, Kratky C, Krautler B. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:4523. [Google Scholar]
- 53.(a) Hoffman BM, Petering DH. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1970;67:637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.2.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chien JCW, Dickinson LC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1972;69:2783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.10.2783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Scheidt WR. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:90–94. doi: 10.1021/ja00808a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dwyer PN, Madura P, Scheidt WR. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:4815. doi: 10.1021/ja00822a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Little RG, Ibers JA. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:4452. doi: 10.1021/ja00821a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jene PG, Ibers JA. Inorg Chem. 2000;39:5796. doi: 10.1021/ic0006753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Brucker EA, Olson JS, Phillips GN, Jr, Dou Y, Ikeda-Saito M. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:25419. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.41.25419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.(a) Perutz MF. Nature. 1970;228:726. doi: 10.1038/228726a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Perutz MF. Br Med Bull. 1976;32:195. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Perutz MF, Wilkinson AJ, Paoli M, Dodson GG. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1998;27:1. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.The R- and T-states of hemoglobin in both the five- and six-coordinate forms have been modeled by changing the axial imidazole from an unhindered to a hindered imidazole.
- 61.Yonetani T, Yamamoto H, Woodrow GV., III J Biol Chem. 1974;249:682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hoard JL, Scheidt WR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70:3919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.